Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2017 Apr 12;8:14829. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14829

Classical synchronization indicates persistent entanglement in isolated quantum systems

Dirk Witthaut 1,2,3,a, Sandro Wimberger 4,5, Raffaella Burioni 4,5, Marc Timme 3,6,7
PMCID: PMC5394286  PMID: 28401881

Abstract

Synchronization and entanglement constitute fundamental collective phenomena in multi-unit classical and quantum systems, respectively, both equally implying coordinated system states. Here, we present a direct link for a class of isolated quantum many-body systems, demonstrating that synchronization emerges as an intrinsic system feature. Intriguingly, quantum coherence and entanglement arise persistently through the same transition as synchronization. This direct link between classical and quantum cooperative phenomena may further our understanding of strongly correlated quantum systems and can be readily observed in state-of-the-art experiments, for example, with ultracold atoms.


Collective phenomena in many-body systems include synchronization in classical and entanglement in quantum systems. Here the authors study isolated many-body quantum systems and demonstrate that synchronization emerges intrinsically, accompanied by the onset of quantum coherence and persistent entanglement.


Understanding collective dynamical phenomena constitutes a topical challenge across physics and beyond, with distinct implications for the classical and quantum realms. How collective phenomena in classical and quantum worlds are linked is largely unknown. Synchronization constitutes one of the most basic cooperative dynamics in classical systems. It indicates the locking of states of coupled classical units and governs the dynamics of physical, chemical, and biological systems1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8. Entanglement constitutes the most fundamental phenomenon in many-body quantum systems and indicates correlations that are genuinely quantum mechanical. Two quantum particles are entangled if they cannot be described by independent single-particle states. Such entanglement thereby determines the quantum systems' inherent complexity9,10 and unique computational power11,12.

In this article, we present a direct link between classical synchronization and quantum entanglement. We investigate a paradigmatic class of isolated nonlinearly coupled quantum systems combining the classical theory of synchronization with simulations of quantum dynamics and mean-field as well as higher-order analysis. We reveal that and how synchronization phenomena impact entanglement. Intriguingly, transient squeezing and number fluctuations indicating genuine entanglement emerge through and exactly at the transition to classical synchronization. Moreover, the dynamics of classical phase locking quantitatively predicts the growth of quantum number fluctuations, and for large system sizes becomes an exact indicator of the growth. As the quantum system is isolated, synchronization is not externally induced but emerges through self-organized dynamics. We demonstrate how this quantum-classical link on the level of collective phenomena may be experimentally verified, for example with ultracold atoms13,14,15,16,17. For a paradigmatic and experimentally relevant class of systems, these results thus indicate that the substantial parts of the emergence of entanglement—a genuine quantum feature—can be traced back to a classical synchronization process.

Results

Signatures of synchronization

Consider the dynamics of a quantum many-body system described by Schrödinger's equation Inline graphic with the Hamiltonian

graphic file with name ncomms14829-m2.jpg

describing L spatially localized modes j∈{1, …, L} (ref. 18) with on-site two-body interactions of energy scale U. Inline graphic denotes the annihilation and Inline graphic the creation operator for the jth mode and Inline graphic is the number operator.

The quantum many-body system (1) exhibits a sharp transition from a weakly to a strongly correlated regime. When the coupling strengths Inline graphic exceed a critical value, correlations emerge dynamically and persist independent of the initial state. This transition (Fig. 1) becomes apparent already for systems with just two modes, which arise in the longitudinal Lipkin-Meshkow-Glick model (see Supplementary Note 1). Figure 1a,b illustrate the different dynamical regimes for a coherent initial state |Ψ(0)〉=|z, Δφ〉, that is, a state which is maximally localized in phase space (see Methods section).

Figure 1. From short-term quantum squeezing to long-term phase coherence and number entanglement.

Figure 1

Quantum dynamics of two coupled oscillators or modes; the initial state being a two-mode coherent state |z, Δφ〉=|0, π/2〉. (a) For sufficiently small coupling strengths (here K=0.1ω) the two modes simply dephase. The Husimi density Q(z, Δφ; t)≡|〈z, Δφ|Ψ(t)〉|2 (ref. 43) spreads out along the phase direction. (b) Squeezing and number entanglement emerge for a sufficiently large coupling strength (here K=0.8ω). At intermediate times, the Husimi density is Q(z, Δφ; t) is compressed in the phase direction. For long times, the quantum state is trapped in the right half of phase space implying preservation of phase coherence. The grey lines in (a,b) show trajectories of the classical mean-field system (2) bearing the Kuramoto model. (ce) Evolution of (c), the squeezing parameter ξ2 (refs 13, 19), (d) the phase coherence α12 and (e) the number entanglement W12 for K=0.8ω (blue line) and K=0.1ω (red line). Short-term quantum squeezing, long-term phase coherence, and number entanglement are observed for a strong coupling K=0.8ω. Parameters for all panels are N=40, U=0.4/N, T=2π/ω and Inline graphic. The initial state is a two-mode coherent state |z, Δφ〉=|0, π/2〉.

For small coupling strengths Inline graphic, correlations remain negligible and the modes gradually dephase, so the phase coherence α12(t) defined by Inline graphic decays rapidly. The Husimi function Q(t), representing the quantum phase space density (see Methods section), spreads in the phase direction, such that the relative phase of the two modes becomes undefined.

In contrast, for sufficiently large coupling strengths Inline graphic, we observe transient squeezing of the quantum state (Fig. 1c): The phase space density Q(t) is compressed in the phase direction and the uncertainty of the relative phase decreases below the standard uncertainty limit, indicating many-body entanglement13,19. Moreover, a strong phase coherence prevails in the long term (Fig. 1d). The reduction of phase fluctuations is accompanied by the emergence of number entanglement: The number fluctuations exceed the maximum possible for any separable (non-entangled) quantum state, indicated by the entanglement parameter W12>0 in Fig. 1e (see Methods section). Strikingly, this type of entanglement is persistent.

Squeezing and entanglement systematically emerge for coupling strengths above some critical value, whereas they are absent below, see Fig. 2. The observed transition indicates a quantum analogue of the classical synchronization transition1,2,3,4. To see this, consider the mean-field limit and derive the equations of motion for the amplitudes Inline graphic from Heisenberg's equation, neglecting quantum fluctuations and approximating Inline graphic. We obtain

Figure 2. Classical synchronization indicates quantum squeezing and number entanglement.

Figure 2

We consider two coupled oscillators, respectively, two quantum modes with variable coupling strength K. (a) The fixed points of the Kuramoto model (4). A stable (solid) and an unstable (dashed) fixed point emerge in a saddle node bifurcation at Kc=|ω|/2. (b) The temporal minimum of the squeezing parameter Inline graphic (refs 13, 19) as a function of the coupling strength K. For U=0 (solid line) the transition to quantum squeezing is located at the critical coupling for classical synchronization, Kc=ω/2. The on-site interaction term ∼U suppresses squeezing such that the transition occurs at a higher value of K for U=0.4/N (dashed line). (c) Long-time average of the entanglement parameter W12 as a function of the coupling strength K. Persistent entanglement W12>0 (see ref. 50 and Methods) emerges with classical synchronization at K>Kc=ω/2, independent of U. The initial quantum state is a two-mode coherent state |z, Δφ〉=|0, π/2〉 with N=100 and ω=1 in all cases.

graphic file with name ncomms14829-m12.jpg

(see Supplementary Note 3 for more details). Given a total number N of excitations, the manifold of the phase space Inline graphic defined by Inline graphic for all Inline graphic is invariant under the dynamics such that Inline graphic in time (see Supplementary Note 3 and ref. 20). With initial conditions on this manifold denoted by Inline graphic the dynamics (2) reduces to

graphic file with name ncomms14829-m18.jpg

The intrinsic frequencies and rescaled coupling strengths become Inline graphic and Inline graphic, respectively.

This mean field limit constitutes a system of Kuramoto oscillators2—a paradigmatic model of classical nonlinear dynamics characterizing synchronization and other collective phenomena3,4. For two modes, the dynamics is fully characterized by the phase difference Δφ=φ2φ1 and the population imbalance z=(|c2|2−|c1|2)/(|c2|2+|c1|2) as the total number of excitations is conserved. The phase dynamics on the invariant manifold z=0 becomes

graphic file with name ncomms14829-m21.jpg

with ω=ω2ω1. This Kuramoto system bifurcates at Kc=|ω|/2, precisely indicating the quantum transition point, see Fig. 2. Below Kc no steady states exist and the phases are unlocked. For K>Kc phase locking emerges such that Δφ(t) tends to the fixed point Δφ*=arcsin(ω/2K), which shapes the corresponding quantum dynamics (Fig. 1a versus b): The Husimi function is contracted at the fixed point such that phase squeezing emerges. Simultaneously, the dynamics is unstable in the z-direction, indicating the growth of number fluctuations. The classical Kuramoto dynamics can thus be seen as a skeleton of the full quantum dynamics21 and the onset of classical synchronization as a skeleton for the emergence of quantum correlations.

The correspondence of classical phase locking and the growth of quantum fluctuations becomes analytically exact for large populations of globally coupled oscillators, that is, Inline graphic with large Inline graphic (Fig. 3a–d). We define the Kuramoto order parameter1,3,4

Figure 3. Classical phase locking indicates growth of quantum number fluctuations.

Figure 3

(a) The classical synchronization order parameter r measures the degree of locking emerging for K>Kc. (b) Synchronization implies an exponential growth of quantum fluctuations. The maximum growth rate Inline graphic in the limit of large systems becomes proportional to the classical synchronization order parameter r as predicted by equation (11). (c) The average phase velocity Inline graphic in the Kuramoto model as a function of natural frequency Inline graphic. Oscillators in the grey region are phase locked, that is, the average phase velocity is identical. (d) Quantum number fluctuations grow rapidly for the oscillators in the the region of classical phase locking (grey), indicated by non-zero values of the growth rate Inline graphic. Results are shown for globally coupled oscillators, that is, Inline graphic in the limit L→∞. Natural frequencies are drawn from a Lorentzian distribution g(ω), for which r(K)=Inline graphic near Kc=2/(πg(0)) (refs 2, 3). Parameters are U=0 and K=2Kc in c,d.

graphic file with name ncomms14829-m24.jpg

In the generic case, the magnitude r relaxes to a fixed value measuring the degree of phase order and γ oscillates with the mean frequency Inline graphic+, ν=N/L being the density of atoms or excitations per mode. Transforming to a co-rotating frame of reference, γ becomes constant and the classical equations of motion (3) simplify to

graphic file with name ncomms14829-m26.jpg

A bifurcation occurs when the coupling K increases: For KKc all oscillators drift independently such that r=0. For K>Kc the oscillators with Inline graphic get phase-locked, Inline graphic such that r>0.

To describe quantum fluctuations beyond mean-field, we decompose the annihilation operators into the condensate mode Inline graphic and the quantum fluctuations Inline graphic, Inline graphic and insert this ansatz into the Heisenberg equations of motion (see Supplementary Note 4 and Supplementary Fig. 4 for more details). To linear order in Inline graphic this yields the Bogoliubov-de Gennes equations22

graphic file with name ncomms14829-m33.jpg

On the Kuramoto manifold the Bogoliubov-de Gennes operator is given by

graphic file with name ncomms14829-m34.jpg

where the coefficients are given by

graphic file with name ncomms14829-m35.jpg

in the rotating frame. In the limit N, L→∞ with fixed ν = N/L, all terms with Inline graphic vanish as L−1 such that the operator Inline graphic describes whether quantum fluctuations grow. For r=0 all eigenvalues Inline graphic of Inline graphic are real, implying that fluctuations do not grow. Once synchronization sets in and r>0, the eigenvalues of the phase-locked oscillators are purely imaginary,

graphic file with name ncomms14829-m40.jpg

such that quantum fluctuations grow exponentially as Inline graphic. The maximum growth rate becomes

graphic file with name ncomms14829-m42.jpg

This growth rate scales as the classical synchronization order parameter (Fig. 3b). Drifting oscillators typically have real eigenvalues, except for the ones in the immediate vicinity of the phase-locked region (compare Fig. 3c versus d). Hence the classical synchronization transition1,2,3,4,5 has a direct quantum counterpart.

Potential experimental realizations

Our predictions are observable in experiments, for example, with Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs) in optical lattices13,14,15,16,17 or modulated photonic lattices23,24. In a tilted or accelerated lattice, the eigenmodes are localized (Fig. 4a) and the energies are arranged in a ladder, Inline graphic (ref. 25). The atomic interactions induce the nonlinear coupling Inline graphic of the neighbouring modes with Inline graphic and Inline graphic otherwise. A detailed discussion of how these parameters depend on the experimental setting is provided in the Supplementary Note 2 and the Supplementary Figs 1–3.

Figure 4. Quantum synchronization manifests in momentum space localization for ultracold atoms.

Figure 4

(a) In a tilted or accelerated optical lattice, the single-particle eigenstates (blue lines) are localized in a few wells of the lattice potential (bold black line). The overlap with other wells induces a nonlinear coupling between the states described by Inline graphic (b,c) Without coupling Inline graphic, the modes dephase due to the on-site interaction ∼U. The coherences αj,j+1 decay to zero and the momentum density distribution ρ(k, t) spreads over the entire Brillouin zone. (d) For Inline graphic there is no entanglement, W2,3=0. (e,f) For Inline graphic, the nonlinear coupling leads to phase locking at φj+1φjπ/2 at intermediate values of the coherence αj,j+1. This leads to a localization of the momentum space density ρ(k, t) around k=0, which can be readily detected in a time-of-flight image. (g) Synchronization implies strong persistent many-body entanglement quantified by the entanglement parameter W2,3>0 (see ref. 50 and Methods). Parameters are L=4, N=12 and U=1.2/2π in units of ωB=2π/TB. The initial state Inline graphic is a pure Bose-Einstein Condensate (BEC) with zero momentum.

Synchronization is detected from the momentum density ρ(k, t) measured in a time-of-flight image (Fig. 4b). For weak coupling Inline graphic, the modes dephase15 such that the coherences Inline graphic vanish. No relative phase is defined and ρ(k, t) delocalizes over the Brillouin zone (Fig. 4b,c). Strong coupling induces synchronization such that the coherences are partly preserved and ρ(k, t) shows a localized peak which does not blur (Fig. 4e,f). The peak remains steady in the center of the Brillouin zone as the phases are locked at a constant value (Fig. 4d). Momentum space localization thus provides a robust experimental quantum signature of synchronization. Synchronization implies number fluctuations signalling entanglement (Fig. 4g), as above for two modes. This entanglement is persistent and emerges for all pure BECs and Fock states with homogeneous density.

Another possibility to experimentally realize our predictions is given by Floquet engineered optical lattices16,17.

Robustness to dissipation

In many models studied so far, quantum signatures of synchronization are induced externally, via dissipation or a common driving26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35. In contrast, the coupling to the environment is not the cause of synchronization in the quantum many-body system (1), which directly bears the Kuramoto model in the mean-field limit. Indeed, this classical synchronization model qualitatively predicts that the quantum system relaxes to different states depending on the coupling strength. The phase coherence Inline graphic, which is most easily accessible in experiments, converges to a non-zero value up to some small residual fluctuations (Figs 1 and 4). But how robust is this intrinsic form of quantum synchronization to perturbations from the environment?

We are reporting a particular destructive case of quantum dissipation, where independent phase noise couples to all modes of the system. Such a noise source arises in experiments with ultracold atoms in optical lattices due to incoherent scattering of photons from the lattice beams36 or collisions with the background gas37. The noisy dynamics can be well captured using a quantum master equation in Lindblad form

graphic file with name ncomms14829-m50.jpg

where Inline graphic is the density operator and κ the noise rate. Numerical simulations of the master equation (12) for two modes indicate the influence of phase noise on the evolution of phase coherence. Without the synchronization coupling (for K=0), already weak noise completely destroys the phase coherence α12(t) within a few periods T as shown in Fig. 5. In contrast, the decay of α12(t) is slower by orders of magnitude in the presence of the coupling (for K>0). Hence, the effects described in the present paper should be experimentally observable also in the presence of noise.

Figure 5. Synchronization-induced phase coherence is robust to noise.

Figure 5

(a) Without coupling (K=0, thin black line), the coherence α12(t) of two coupled modes decays rapidly in the presence of phase noise. The synchronisation coupling Inline graphic slows down this decay by orders of magnitude (K=0.8 dash-dotted blue line, K=0.4 solid turquois line). For a weak but non-zero coupling, the phase coherence becomes almost constant in time at a value of α12(t)≈10−1 after a transient decrease (K=0.1 dashed red line). The noise strength is κ=0.02. (b) Phase coherence is remarkably robust especially in the subcritical regime 0<KKc. For K=0.1 the coherence α12(t) at time t=20 T is almost independent of the noise strength κ. The remaining parameters are as in Fig. 1.

The robustness of the phase coherence depends crucially on the coupling strength K. For supercritical coupling K>Kc the quantum state tends to a highly entangled superposition of atoms being localized in one of the wells, making it more susceptible to noise. Phase coherence decays in time, but the decay is still much slower than without coupling. The mode-coupling through the Hamiltonian Inline graphic induces phase coherence also for 0<KKc, but without strong number fluctuations. This form of coherence is remarkably robust. After an initial drop, the phase coherence α12(t) remains almost constant in time for the subcritical coupling K=0.1 (Fig. 5a) and the final value of α12(t) is almost independent of the noise strength κ (Fig. 5b). For different sources of noise or dissipation (less uncorrelated for instance) we expect an even better robustness in all mentioned regimes.

Discussion

In summary, we have unearthed the manifestation of classical synchronization in a class of quantum many-body systems, providing a direct link between collective classical and quantum dynamics. So far, synchronization and entanglement have been mostly studied as two separate phenomena in the classical and quantum worlds, respectively. Recent previous works considered aspects of synchronization in open quantum model systems, where the coupling to the environment is crucial. The interaction with a common thermal bath can incude synchronization of qubits26 or harmonic oscillators27, as well as a common classical driving field28. Synchronization has also been studied for quantum van der Pol oscillators29,30,31,32 and other driven dissipative oscillators33,34. In all these cases, dissipation and external driving play a crucial role, for instance the self-sustained oscillations of the van der Pol oscillators are entirely driven by the exchange of excitations with the bath. It has also been shown that quantum effects can prevent the occurrence of synchronization of coupled spins38. The Kuramoto model itself has been recovered in the semiclassical limit of different quantum system, in particular particles moving in tilted washboard potential35, coupled optomechanical oscillators39 or Josephson junction arrays40. In contrast, we here analysed a class of isolated quantum systems, demonstrating that synchronization emerges as an intrinsic system feature. We recover the celebrated Kuramoto model in the mean-field limit, which can be seen as a skeleton for the full-quantum many-body dynamics.

Indeed, the transition to synchronization clearly indicates squeezing, long-term coherence and persistent entanglement. Moreover, the dynamics of phase locking in the synchronization process indicates the growth of number fluctuations, becoming exact in the limit of large system sizes. Our findings can be directly verified by state-of-the-art experiments, for instance with ultracold atoms in accelerated or driven optical lattices13,14,15,16,17 or modulated photonic lattices23,24. These experiments are facilitated by the observed robustness with respect to dissipation. They offer a unique control over the system parameters such that various distributions of natural frequencies can be realized which can give rise to different types of synchronization phase transitions41,42. Advanced imaging techniques allow to observe the global phase coherence as well as number distributions with single site resolution. These results thus offer a novel perspective on a correspondence between classical and quantum dynamics, on the level of collective phenomena.

Methods

Coherent states

Spin coherent states are defined as Inline graphic. They are maximally localized in phase space and thus provide a natural link to the classical mean-field dynamics18. The projection of a quantum state on a coherent states defines the Husimi function Q(z, Δφ; t)≡|〈z, Δφ|Ψ(t)〉|2. It carries all information about the quantum state and shares properties of a classical phase space density43.

Squeezing

To quantify squeezing one defines the collective operators Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic which form an angular momentum algebra. The squeezing parameter is then defined as Inline graphic where Inline graphic is a rotation of the vector operator Inline graphic. Spectroscopic squeezing with ξ2<1 is only possible for entangled states and enables high-precision quantum metrology13,19.

Number entanglement

The variance of the number difference between two modes Inline graphic is bounded for every pure separable state as Inline graphic (ref. 44). If the entanglement parameter Inline graphic exceeds zero for a pure state, this unambiguously proves the entanglement of the modes. States with large Wjk are used in precision quantum metrology45,46,47.

Tilted optical lattices

To study the quantum dynamics in tilted or accelerated optical lattices, we expand the bosonic field operator in the single-particle eigenmodes Inline graphic assuming that tunneling to excited Bloch bands is negligible. The eigenmodes Inline graphic are arranged in ladders with equidistant eigenenergies Inline graphic, where ωB is the Bloch frequency25. Depending on the tilting, the eigenmodes are strongly localized in real space (Fig. 4a), such that they couple only to the nearest neighbours. The momentum space density is given by

graphic file with name ncomms14829-m66.jpg

In the non-interacting case U=K=0 the coherences are constant in magnitude and the phases evolve according to Inline graphic. The atoms show a periodic dynamics, referred to a Bloch oscillations, with the Bloch period TB=2π/ωB (refs 25, 48). Pure on-site interactions lead to dephasing such that the coherences vanish, Inline graphic→0 for Inline graphic and the momentum density reads Inline graphic, which is extended over the entire first Brillouin zone15,49.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study (in particular simulation source code and figure raw data) are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Witthaut, D. et al. Classical synchronization indicates persistent entanglement in isolated quantum systems. Nat. Commun. 8, 14829 doi: 10.1038/ncomms14829 (2017).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures, Supplementary Notes and Supplementary References.

ncomms14829-s1.pdf (143.6KB, pdf)
Peer Review File
ncomms14829-s2.pdf (548.6KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We thank Matteo di Volo and Alessandro Vezzani for helpful discussions and gratefully acknowledge support from the Helmholtz association (grant no. VH-NG-1025 to D.W.), the FIL 2014 program of Parma University, and the Max Planck Society (grant to M.T).

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Author contributions D.W. and M.T. designed and conceived the research. D.W. worked out the theory and carried out the numerical experiments. D.W. and S.W. worked out the possible experimental realizations. All authors contributed ideas, analysis tools and to the writing of the manuscript.

References

  1. Pikovsky A., Rosenblum M. & Kurths J. Synchronization: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences Cambridge Univ. Press (2003). [Google Scholar]
  2. Kuramoto Y. in International Symposium on Mathematical Problems in Theoretical Physics, Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 39 (ed. Araki, H.) 420 (Springer, 1975).
  3. Strogatz S. H. From Kuramoto to Crawford: exploring the onset of synchronization in populations of coupled oscillators. Phys. D Nonlin. Phenomen. 143, 1–20 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  4. Acebrón J. A., Bonilla L. L., Pérez Vicente C. J., Ritort F. & Spigler R. The Kuramoto model: A simple paradigm for synchronization phenomena. Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 137–185 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  5. Arenas A., Diaz-Guilera A., Kurths J., Moreno Y. & Zhou C. Synchronization in complex networks. Phys. Rep. 469, 93–153 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  6. Campa A., Dauxois T. & Ruffo S. Statistical mechanics and dynamics of solvable models with long-range interactions. Phys. Rep. 480, 57–159 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  7. Nixon M. et al. Controlling synchronization in large laser networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 214101 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Schöll E., Klapp S. H. L., Hövel P. (eds). Control of self-organizing nonlinear systems Springer (2016). [Google Scholar]
  9. Vidal G. Efficient classical simulation of slightly entangled quantum computations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 147902 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cirac J. I. & Zoller P. Goals and opportunities in quantum simulation. Nat. Phys. 8, 264–266 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  11. Bennett C. H. & DiVincenzo D. P. Quantum information and computation. Nature 404, 247–255 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Howard M., Wallman J., Veitch V. & Emerson J. Contextuality supplies the magic for quantum computation. Nature 510, 351–355 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Esteve J., Gross C., Weller A., Giovanazzi S. & Oberthaler M. K. Squeezing and entanglement in a Bose-Einstein condensate. Nature 455, 1216–1219 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bloch I. Quantum coherence and entanglement with ultracold atoms in optical lattices. Nature 453, 1016–1022 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Meinert F. et al. Interaction-induced quantum phase revivals and evidence for the transition to the quantum chaotic regime in 1D atomic Bloch oscillations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 193003 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rapp A., Deng X. & Santos L. Ultracold lattice gases with periodically modulated interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 203005 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Meinert F., Mark M. J., Lauber K., Daley A. J. & Nägerl H.-C. Floquet engineering of correlated tunneling in the Bose-Hubbard model with ultracold atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 205301 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhang W.-M., Feng D. H. & Gilmore R. Coherent states: Theory and some applications. Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 867–927 (1990). [Google Scholar]
  19. Sørenson A., Duan L.-M., Cirac J. I. & Zoller P. Many-particle entanglement with Bose-Einstein condensates. Nature 409, 63–66 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Witthaut D. & Timme M. Kuramoto dynamics in hamiltonian systems. Phys. Rev. E 90, 032917 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Berry M. V. & Mount K. Semiclassical approximations in wave mechanics. Rep. Prog. Phys 35, 315–397 (1972). [Google Scholar]
  22. Castin Y. & Dum R. Instability and depletion of an excited Bose-Einstein condensate in a trap. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3553–3556 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  23. Bromberg Y., Lahini Y., Morandotti R. & Silberberg Y. Quantum and classical correlations in waveguide lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 253904 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Garanovich I. L., Longhi S., Sukhorukov A. A. & Kivshar Y. S. Light propagation and localization in modulated photonic lattices and waveguides. Phys. Rep. 518, 1–79 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  25. Glück M., Kolovsky A. R. & Korsch H. J. Wannier-Stark resonances in optical and semiconductor superlattices. Phys. Rep. 366, 103–182 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  26. Giorgi G. L., Plastina F., Francica G. & Zambrini R. Spontaneous synchronization and quantum correlation dynamics of open spin systems. Phys. Rev. A 88, 042115 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  27. Manzano G., Galve F., Giorgi G. L., Hernandez-Garcia E. & Zambrini R. Synchronization, quantum correlations and entanglement in oscillator networks. Sci. Rep. 3, 1439 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhirov O. V. & Shepelyansky D. L. Quantum synchronization and entanglement of two qubits coupled to a driven dissipative resonator. Phys. Rev. B 80, 014519 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  29. Lee T. E. & Sadeghpour H. R. Quantum synchronization of quantum van der Pol oscillators with trapped ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 234101 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lee T. E., Chan C.-K. & Wang S. Entanglement tongue and quantum synchronization of disordered oscillators. Phys. Rev. E 89, 022913 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Walter S., Nunnenkamp A. & Bruder C. Quantum synchronization of a driven self-sustained oscillator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 094102 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Bastidas V. M., Omelchenko I., Zakharova A., Schöll E. & Brandes T. Quantum signatures of chimera states. Phys. Rev. E 92, 062924 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Holmes C. A., Meaney C. P. & Milburn G. J. Synchronization of many nanomechanical resonators coupled via a common cavity field. Phys. Rev. E 85, 066203 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Mari A., Farace A., Didier N., Giovannetti V. & Fazio R. Measures of quantum synchronization in continuous variable systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 103605 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hermoso de Mendoza I., Pachón L. A., Gómez-Gardeñes J. & Zueco D. Synchronization in a semiclassical Kuramoto model. Phys. Rev. E 90, 052904 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Pichler H., Daley A. J. & Zoller P. Nonequilibrium dynamics of bosonic atoms in optical lattices: Decoherence of many-body states due to spontaneous emission. Phys. Rev. A 82, 063605 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  37. Anglin J. Cold, dilute, trapped bosons as an open quantum system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 6–9 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  38. Liu Y., Piechon F. & Fuchs J. N. Quantum loss of synchronization in the dynamics of two spins. Europhys. Lett. 103, 17007 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  39. Heinrich G., Ludwig M., Qian J., Kubala B. & Marquardt F. Collective dynamics in optomechanical arrays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 043603 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wiesenfeld K., Colet P. & Strogatz S. H. Frequency locking in Josephson arrays: Connection with the Kuramoto model. Phys. Rev. E 57, 1563–1569 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  41. Pazó D. Thermodynamic limit of the first-order phase transition in the Kuramoto model. Phys. Rev. E 72, 046211 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Gupta S., Campa A. & Ruffo S. Kuramoto model of synchronization: Equilibrium and nonequilibrium aspects. J. Stat. Mech. 2014, R08001 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  43. Schleich W. P. Quantum Optics in Phase Space Wiley-VCH (2001). [Google Scholar]
  44. Tóth G., Knapp C., Gühne O. & Briegel H. J. Optimal spin squeezing inequalities detect bound entanglement in spin models. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 250405 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Bollinger J. J., Itano W. M., Wineland D. J. & Heinzen D. J. Optimal frequency measurements with maximally correlated states. Phys. Rev. A 54, R4649 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Giovannetti V., Lloyd S. & Maccone L. Quantum-enhanced measurements: Beating the standard quantum limit. Science 306, 1330–1336 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Giovannetti V., Lloyd S. & Maccone L. Advances in quantum metrology. Nat. Photon. 5, 222–229 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  48. Dahan M. B., Peik E., Reichel J., Castin Y. & Salomon C. Bloch oscillations of atoms in an optical potential. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4508–4511 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Buchleitner A. & Kolovsky A. R. Interaction-induced decoherence of atomic Bloch oscillations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 253002 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Kordas G., Wimberger S. & Witthaut D. Dissipation induced macroscopic entanglement in an open optical lattice. Europhys. Lett. 100, 30007 (2012). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures, Supplementary Notes and Supplementary References.

ncomms14829-s1.pdf (143.6KB, pdf)
Peer Review File
ncomms14829-s2.pdf (548.6KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study (in particular simulation source code and figure raw data) are available from the corresponding author upon request.


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES