Skip to main content
Biopreservation and Biobanking logoLink to Biopreservation and Biobanking
. 2017 Apr 1;15(2):93–94. doi: 10.1089/bio.2017.0007

Genes for Life: Biobanking for Genetic Research in Africa

Elizabeth Sarah Mayne 1,, Talishiea Croxton 2,,3, Alash'le Abimiku 2,,3, Moses Joloba 4, Samuel Kyobe 4, Christine M Beiswanger 5, Louise Wideroff 6, Mark Guyer 6, Jennifer Troyer 6, Mukthar Kader 7
PMCID: PMC5397245

Biobanks are organized collections of biospecimens and associated data from large number of individuals for the purpose of health research. The number of biobanks has expanded in the genomics era to facilitate analysis of high-quality biospecimens with associated phenotypic data. Biobanks support biomarker identification, therapeutic development, and evidence-based decision making that ultimately benefit public health.1

Biobanking in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is less developed, with most biobanks in these settings focusing on specific diseases or populations.2 Human disease is under-researched in LMICs that carry 90% of the global disease burden and produce only 10% of the global research output.3 Only 2% of authors publishing in biobanking are based in Africa.4 Many African biobanks only store material temporarily for shipment to higher income countries.5,6

Human Health and Heredity in Africa (H3Africa) was established as a pan-African Consortium to study the genetic basis of diseases with African (and international) relevance. A mandate of the consortium is capacity development in genetic research,7,8 and storage of high-quality DNA and other biological samples is central to accomplishing this mandate.5

Although established biobanks exist outside Africa, reasons exist for establishing African biobanks for African research.9,10 African populations are genetically diverse. Fully understanding the genetic basis of disease among the different populations, geographically and ethnically, is central to improving healthcare by identifying new targets for diagnosis and therapy. This population-based genetic research requires resources. Of these, high-quality stored DNA with associated phenotypic data is one of the most important. In addition, cultural, ethical, and legal requirements insist that samples collected from African populations contribute to those populations' health needs.11 Certain African countries have regulations prohibiting storage of biospecimens for unspecified research, others require separate consent for storage of samples. Approval may also be required for reuse or export of samples.12 These requirements mean that clinical researchers must be empowered to design protocols that will accurately reflect both the planned usage of stored material and the local understanding and regulations concerning consent. Custodianship of samples and phenotypic data often rests with the participant rather than the researcher. It is easier to align with national policies when samples remain on the continent. The H3Africa biorepositories are integrally involved in the design of storage guidelines and material transfer agreements in consultation with institutional review boards, national experts, and community leaders.13

Biobanks in Africa also face some challenges, including logistical problems, infrastructure requirements, and training needs. A number of African countries have become adept at working within these constraints, but, in alignment with the goals of H3Africa, there has been significant progress in establishing facilities that meet international standards. These adapt technologies for storage of genetic material for the H3Africa project. It often becomes necessary to develop local solutions, for example, hybrid solutions for H3Africa shipment problems. These include consortium-wide negotiations to ensure that couriers provide cost-efficient shipping with effective local service, consideration of alternatives to using dry ice, and communication modalities to maintain and monitor sample chain-of-custody. These solutions may inform future development of biorepositories on the continent and in other LMICs. Spare capacity could facilitate collaboration with other stakeholders for current and future genetic research with high-quality genetic specimens for the African scientists trained within the H3Africa consortium.14

Finally, it is important that African health needs are addressed. This is best done with local access to the samples and local research protocols. Local ownership of samples and biobanks is key to ensuring sustainability of the biorepositories. Ownership of the research generated will ensure that findings translate into healthcare practices in the local community, health policies, and regulations.10 Storage of biological material from patients with rare diseases, found only in African populations, in addition to large stores of material from patients with common conditions, which pose a significant public health risk, and from healthy controls5,15 will enable Africans to participate in global initiatives to counter health threats.

Biobanks are a significant resource for any research initiative. They will be fundamental pillars underpinning the development of world-class research on the African continent. As the importance of storing genetic material is highlighted by the outputs already flowing from the clinical projects in H3Africa, it is hoped that the potential applications of stored material from basic research to quality assurance to informing health policy are recognized by the stakeholders. Biorepositories must store inclusively, representing the widely diverse ethnic populations in Africa, and provide inclusive outputs with long-term benefits for African and international health. Quality specimens stored in the H3Africa biorepositories will be a vital resource for future research to strengthen health systems. The vision of the H3Africa biorepository flagship project is to map the path for African biorepositories so that Africans possess the tools to research and take ownership of their own health.

Contributor Information

Collaborators: H3Africa Biorepository Working Group

Acknowledgments

The H3Africa Consortium Biorepositories are funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health grants UH3HG007008, UH3HG007051, UH3HG007438, UH2HG007092 of the H3Africa Common Fund Initiative.

Author Disclosure Statement

No conflicting financial interests exist.

References

  • 1.Fransson MN, et al. Toward a common language for biobanking. Eur J Hum Genet 2015;23:22–28 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gasmelseed N, et al. Sub-Saharan centralized biorepository for genetic and genomic research. Sci Total Environ 2012;423:210–213 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gupta S, et al. Challenges and prospects for biomarker research: A current perspective from the developing world. Biochim Biophys Acta 2014;1844:899–908 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Astrin JJ, Betsou F. Trends in biobanking: A bibliometric overview. Biopreserv Biobank 2016;14:65–74 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vaught J. Biobanking and biosecurity initiatives in Africa. Biopreserv Biobank 2016;14:355–356 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mduluza T, et al. Maintaining respect and fairness in the usage of stored shared specimens. BMC Med Ethics 2013;14(Suppl 1):S7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Consortium HA, et al. Research capacity. Enabling the genomic revolution in Africa. Science 2014;344:1346–1348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gurdasani D, et al. The African Genome Variation Project shapes medical genetics in Africa. Nature 2015;517:327–332 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Abayomi A, et al. Challenges of biobanking in South Africa to facilitate indigenous research in an environment burdened with human immunodeficiency virus, tuberculosis, and emerging noncommunicable diseases. Biopreserv Biobank 2013;11:347–354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mendy M, et al. Infrastructure and facilities for human biobanking in low- and middle-income countries: A situation analysis. Pathobiology 2014;81:252–260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Igbe MA, Adebamowo CA. Qualitative study of knowledge and attitudes to biobanking among lay persons in Nigeria. BMC Med Ethics 2012;13:27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Staunton C, Moodley K. Challenges in biobank governance in Sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Med Ethics 2013;14:35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Munung NS, et al. Obtaining informed consent for genomics research in Africa: Analysis of H3Africa consent documents. J Med Ethics 2016;42:132–137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.de Vries J, et al. The H3Africa policy framework: Negotiating fairness in genomics. Trends Genet 2015;31:117–119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hewitt RE. Biobanking: The foundation of personalized medicine. Curr Opin Oncol 2011;23:112–119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biopreservation and Biobanking are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES