Abstract
Introduction
Osteoprotegerin (OPG) is a member of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor family. It has recently been demonstrated that OPG is produced by a variety of tissues, including the cardiovascular system (heart, arteries, veins), lung, kidney, immune tissues, and bone. The OPG–RANKL signaling pathway is strongly related to vascular calcification. We determined the association of this biomarker with subclinical atherosclerosis in SLE.
Methods
We measured OPG and markers of subclinical atherosclerosis (coronary artery calcium CAC, carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) carotid plaque) in 166 SLE patients (91% female, 64% Caucasian, 31% African-American, 5% others, mean age 45 yrs). Subgroups of patients with different levels of OPG level were compared with respect to average levels of CAC, cIMT, and with respect to presence of carotid plaque. Age was adjusted for using multiple regression.
Results
OPG was highly correlated with age (p<.0001). Those with higher levels of OPG tended to have higher measures of CAC, cIMT, and more carotid plaque. However, after adjustment for age, these associations, while still positive, were no longer statistically significant.
Conclusion
In our study much of the association observed was due to confounding by age, and after adjusting for age, our findings do not rule out the possibility of a null association.
Keywords: Systemic lupus erythematosus, inflammation, atherosclerosis, OPG, CT
Introduction
Osteoprotegerin (OPG), a member of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor family, has been identified as a regulator of bone resorption (5). OPG is produced by a variety of organs and tissues, including the cardiovascular system (heart, arteries, veins), lung, kidney, and immune tissues, and bone (5,6). The expression and production of OPG is complex and is regulated by various cytokines and hormones (7). Human microvascular endothelial cells (HMVEC) express transcripts for OPG, and tumor necrosis factor- and interleukin-1 increase OPG expression 5–40-fold in HMVEC (8). Increased plasma levels of OPG have been found in patients with diabetes mellitus (9,10,11) and have also been associated with diabetic microvascular manifestations (11). Increased OPG levels have been seen in various autoimmune conditions including rheumatoid arthritis, Kawasaki’s disease and Crohn’s disease (12,13,14). We have previously shown OPG to be associated with measures of lupus nephritis (15).
Serum OPG has been implicated in the development of atherosclerosis in the general population. High levels were not only associated with overall cardiovascular mortality but were a novel marker for stroke in women (9). Other studies have shown high levels of OPG to be associated with cardiovascular disease (16,17). In a study of 201 patients who underwent coronary angiography due to stable chest pain, serum OPG levels were greater in patients with significant stenosis versus those without. There is also one study showing and independent association of OPG with subclinical atherosclerosis in SLE, but that study was restricted to premenopausal women (18). In another study plasma levels of OPG were significantly higher in patients with coronary and inflammatory rheumatic disease than in patients with coronary artery disease alone (19).
To further investigate the association of OPG with atherosclerosis in a general SLE population we investigated whether serum OPG was associated with subclinical measures of atherosclerosis, including coronary artery calcium (CAC) score, the occurrence of carotid plaque and carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) at the baseline visit of patients participating in a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of atorvastatin 40 mg versus matching placebo (20).
Methods
In this study, we analyzed baseline data from LAPS (a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of atorvastatin 40 mg versus matching placebo), described elsewhere (20).
Study Participants
Study participants were members of the Hopkins Lupus Cohort who chose to participate in a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of atorvastatin 40 mg versus matching placebo (20). Patients with a history of an atherosclerotic event (such as angina or myocardial infarction), were excluded. Of the two hundred patients enrolled in this trial, complete baseline data (including coronary artery calcium, cIMT, OPG levels) were available for 166 patients. All patients gave informed consent and the study was approved by the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board (NCT 00120887).
Coronary artery calcium was assessed by multidetector computerized tomography and cIMT and carotid plaque were assessed by carotid duplex ultrasound.
Measurement of Coronary Artery Calcification
Coronary artery calcification scores were calculated using Agatston scoring. Coronary artery calcification was assessed by multidetector computerized tomography with a Siemens Volume Zoom Scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions Malvern, Pa) using a 2.5 mm collimation and a slice width of 3 mm, with both scans done on the same machine. Data were reloaded into Siemens Leonardo workstation, using the Siemens calcium scoring software. Coronary artery calcification was quantified using a standard scoring system, available as part of the scanner software package (21). There is excellent reproducibility of coronary artery calcification using computed tomography (22).
Measurement of Carotid intima-media thickness and Carotid plaque
cIMT was measured using high resolution B-mode ultrasound to image the right and left common carotid arteries using a single ultrasound machine (Philips Medical Systems Sonos 5500) with a linear array 8-MHz scan head with standardized image settings, including resolution mode, depth of field, gain, and transmit focus. Digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) images from a diastolic frame of the cine-loop recording were electronically stored and transferred via optical disk to an off-line work station for analysis. cIMT thickness was measured between the lumen intima and media-adventitia interfaces of the far wall of the common carotid artery (the 1 cm segment proximal to the bifurcation) by a single reader using an automated edge detection system. The mean intima-media thickness of this one cm segment was measured on two separate images of the left and the right common carotid artery at the peak of the R wave on a simultaneous electrocardiogram tracing. The mean of these four measurements was used as the intima-media thickness. We chose this location because of its demonstrated reproducibility compared with measurements of cIMT thickness at other sites (23,24). Both patients and providers were blinded to the intima-media thickness results until the 2-year follow-up examination was completed and each examination was considered as an independent study. Provider did not know the previous intima-media thickness results.
Carotid plaque was defined as focal protrusion into the lumen with a thickness at least 50% greater than the surrounding intima-media thickness (25,26).
Measurement of Osteoprotegrin
OPG was measured by EIA on stored serum sera. OPG was measured by EIA (R&D systems, Stillwater, MN) on stored serum sera (−80C, <3 freeze thaw cycles) as previously described and validated (27).
Statistical Methods
To assess the association between patient characteristics and OPG levels, we log-transformed the OPG measures (due to the skewness of the distribution) and compared patient subgroups with respect to mean log-transformed OPG. Statistical significance was based on an F-test from an ANOVA model. To assess the association between OPG and atherosclerosis, we divided the patients into subgroups based on tertials of OPG and compared these groups with respect to mean log-transformed coronary plaque score, mean intima-media thickness, and proportion with carotid plaque. To assess these associations, adjusting for age, we used multiple linear regression or logistic regression as appropriate. In these models, age was included as a continuous variable. In the analysis of coronary plaque score we transformed the score as log(score+1) so that those with a score of 0 were included in the analysis with a value of 0.
Results
The SLE patients were 91% female, 64% Caucasian, 31% African-American, and 5% other ethnicity. The mean age was 45 ± 11.3 years. The cumulative revised American College of Rheumatology classification criteria included: malar rash 62%, discoid rash 23%, photosensitivity 63%, oral ulcers 58%, arthritis 82%, serositis 52%, renal disorder 44%, neurologic disorder 10%, immunologic disorder 87% and ANA positivity 98%.
Values of OPG ranged from 309 to 6709 pmol/L. The mean OPG was 1656 (SD=928). The median was 1402. The distribution was skewed to the right.
Table 1 shows the association between OPG and the patient characteristics based on log-transformed values of osteoprotegin. OPG was highly correlated with age (p<.0001). OPG was also associated with hs-CRP (p=0.0007). African-Americans had higher OPG compared to Caucasians. However this difference as not statistically significant (p=0.09) (Table 1).
Table 1.
Characteristic | n | Mean (SD) log OPG | P-value |
---|---|---|---|
| |||
Age | |||
<40 | 49 | 7.10 (0.48) | <0.0001 |
40–49 | 59 | 7.27 (0.37) | |
50+ | 58 | 7.48 (0.49) | |
| |||
Sex | |||
Female | 151 | 7.30 (0.49) | 0.77 |
Male | 15 | 7.26 (0.19) | |
| |||
Race | |||
Caucasian-American | 106 | 7.25 (0.48) | 0.09 |
African American | 51 | 7.41 (0.45) | |
Other | 9 | 7.16 (0.41) | |
| |||
BMI | |||
<18 | 3 | 6.97 (0.25) | 0.241 |
18–25 | 52 | 7.26 (0.46) | |
25–30 | 55 | 7.25 (0.47) | |
30+ | 56 | 7.38 (0.49) | |
| |||
Total Cholesterol (mg/dl) | |||
<200 | 111 | 7.25 (0.48) | 0.11 |
200+ | 55 | 7.38 (0.46) | |
| |||
LDL (mg/dl) | |||
<100 | 85 | 7.25 (0.49) | 0.28 |
100–129 | 45 | 7.39 (0.49) | |
130+ | 36 | 7.28 (0.40) | |
| |||
HDL (mg/dl) | |||
<40 | 20 | 7.23 (0.49) | 0.38 |
40–59 | 75 | 7.26 (0.49) | |
60+ | 71 | 7.35 (0.45) | |
| |||
High Sensitivity CRP (mg/L) | |||
<1 | 43 | 7.14 (0.44) | 0.0007 |
1–2.9 | 44 | 7.18 (0.47) | |
3+ | 79 | 7.44 (0.45) | |
| |||
SLEDAI | |||
0 | 81 | 7.32 (0.42) | 0.46 |
1–3 | 46 | 7.22 (0.51) | |
4+ | 39 | 7.33 (0.53) |
P=0.054 for increasing log-opg by increasing BMI (body mass index),
OPG. Osteoprotegrin
SD. Standard deviation
Table 2 shows the mean of the log-transformed coronary calcium score in subgroups defined by tertials of the OPG measure. It is evident that the mean coronary plaque score increases with higher levels of OPG, and these differences are statistically significant. Since both coronary plaque and OPG increase with age, this association is due, in part, to confounding by age. The right two columns of the table show the association between OPG and coronary plaque score after adjustment for age in a linear regression model. After adjustment for age, those with medium or high levels of OPG still had higher levels of coronary calcium, however, these differences did not reach statistical significance at the 0.05-level.
Table 2.
OPG Levels | Unadjusted for Age | Adjusted for Age | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean log-transformed coronary plaque score | Mean Difference relative to low (95% Confidence Interval) | P-value | Mean Difference relative to low (95% Confidence Interval) | P-value | |
Low (n=55) | 0.56 | 0.0 (Ref. Group) | 0.0 (Ref. Group) | ||
Medium (n=55) | 1.29 | 0.73 (0.03, 1.43) | 0.042 | 0.51 (−0.16, 1.18) | 0.14 |
High (n56) | 1.81 | 1.25 (0.55, 1.94) | 0.0005 | 0.66 (−0.05, 1.37) | 0.069 |
OPG. Osteoprotegrin
Table 3 shows the unadjusted and adjusted association between OPG and the mean cIMT. Similar to what was seen for the coronary calcium score, there was a significant association between OPG and intima-media thickness, but after adjustment for age, this association was strongly attenuated and no longer significant.
Table 3.
OPG Levels | Unadjusted for Age | Adjusted for Age | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean carotid intima-media thickness | Mean Difference relative to low (95% Confidence Interval) | P-value | Mean Difference relative to low (95% Confidence Interval) | P-value | |
Low (n=55) | 0.54 | 0.0 (Ref. Group) | |||
Medium (n=55) | 0.57 | 0.04 (−0.00, 0.02) | 0.069 | 0.02 (−0.01, 0.05) | 0.26 |
High (n56) | 0.60 | 0.06 (0.03, 0.10) | 0.0011 | 0.02 (−0.01, 0.06) | 0.24 |
OPG. Osteoprotegrin
Table 4 shows the unadjusted and adjusted association between OPG and presence of carotid plaque. Among those with low OPG levels, only 3 (6%) had carotid plaque. However, among those with high levels of OPG, 16 (29%) had carotid plaque. After adjustment for age, there is still an estimated increased odds of carotid plaque among those with medium or high levels of OPG (OR=3.1 and 3.2 respectively). However these increases are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level (p=0.11 and 0.10 for medium and high levels respectively).
Table 4.
OPG Levels | Unadjusted for Age | Adjusted for Age | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number (%) with carotid plaque | Odds Ratio (95% confidence interval) | P-value | Odds Ratio (95% confidence interval) | P-value | |
Low (n=54) | 3 (6%) | 1.0 (Ref. Group) | 1.0 (Ref Group) | ||
Medium (n=55) | 10 (18%) | 3.8 (1.0, 14.) | 0.054 | 3.1 (0.8, 12.4) | 0.11 |
High (n=55) | 16 (29%) | 7.0 (1.9, 25.6) | 0.0035 | 3.2 (0.8, 12.8) | 0.10 |
OPG. Osteoprotegrin
Discussion
In this novel study of SLE patients, OPG was related to subclinical markers of atherosclerosis in terms of CAC, cIMT and c-plaque. However, these relationships were no longer significant after adjustments for age. Hence, the apparent association between OPG and the subclinical atherosclerosis markers appear to be confounded by its relationship to age, which is also positively related to cardiovascular risk. Thus, our study does not support the notion that OPG is an independent marker of cardiovascular risk in SLE: it might rather be a marker of aging. Indeed, also previous studies in the general population and in SLE patients demonstrated a positive relationship between OPG levels and age (10,28,29,30). Though, a real association between OPG and atherosclerosis cannot be definitely ruled out by our study, e.g. due to a relatively low sample size.
Previous studies indicated that the OPG/RANKL/RANK axis is implicated in atherogenesis (31). High OPG levels have been reported to be associated with a higher prevalence and severity of coronary artery disease (9,12,32). In a study of 490 white women greater than 65 years of age, serum OPG levels were greater among women with diabetes versus those without. These levels were also associated with all cause mortality not confounded by diabetes (OR 1.4, 95% C.I 1.2–1.8) (9).
OPG plays an important role in plaque stability. It binds with TRAIL, which is a potent activator of apoptosis. It therefore inhibits TRAIL induced apoptosis in vascular cells leading to plaque instability. In one study, OPG levels were significantly higher in patients with unstable angina compared to healthy controls (32).
OPG levels have been shown to be higher in patients with SLE. In a study of seventy-nine SLE patients with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome and ninety-two healthy controls, OPG levels were higher in SLE patients with APS and their levels correlated with APS antibodies titers (28). Serum OPG levels positively correlated with both anticardiolipin (aCL-IgG) and ant-beta 2 (αβ2GP1-IgG) (p=0.026, p<0.001). The mechanism of origin and association of OPG with antiphospholipid antibodies is uncertain but it is hypothesized that since antiphospholipid antibodies are associated with myocardial infarction and cardiac death. Therefore, OPG might be associated with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome.
In a study of 68 rheumatoid arthritis patients with no history of cardiovascular disease vs. controls, serum OPG levels were increased and correlated with cIMT thickness compared to controls (33). In line with hypothesis that ongoing inflammation within plaque and vascular insult may lead to increased OPG levels, our study showed a positive association between hs-CRP and serum OPG. Similar association between serum OPG and hs-CRP has been seen in diabetic patients (34).
This study has several potential limitations. First, due to relatively small sample size could be one of the reasons why our results differ from other studies, the lack of some associations might be due to a Type-2 error. Second, corticosteroids increase RANKL expression and thus decrease OPG levels, we did not look at this association (35). An advantage of our study is the opportunity to examine the relationship between OPG and several markers of atherosclerosis. In our study much of the association observed was due to confounding by age, and after adjusting for age, our findings do not rule out the possibility of a null association.
Key Message.
OPG was associated with subclinical measures of atherosclerosis.
This is the first study to look at three measures of subclinical atherosclerosis including coronary artery calcium, carotid plaque and carotid intima-media thickness.
Acknowledgments
The Hopkins Lupus Cohort is supported by a grant from the National Institute of Health (NIH AR 43727).
Footnotes
There are no relevant financial disclosures.
Literature Cited
- 1.Austin HA, Boumpas DT, Vaughan EM, Balow JE. High-risk features of lupus nephritis: importance of race and clinical and histological factors in 166 patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1995;10:1620–1628. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dooley MA, Hogan S, Jennette C, Falk R. Cyclophosphamide therapy for lupus nephritis: poor renal survival in black Americans. Glomerular Disease Collaborative Network. Kidney Int. 1997;51:1188–95. doi: 10.1038/ki.1997.162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bastian HM, Alarcon GS, Roseman JM, McGwin G, Jr, Vila LM, Fessler BJ, Reveille JD. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in a multi-ethnic US cohort (LUMINA) XLII: factors predictive of new or worsening proteinuria. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007;46:683–9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kel347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Singh RR, Saxena V, Zang S, Li L, Finkelman FD, Witte DP. Differential contribution of IL-4 and STAT6 vs STAT4 to the development of lupus nephritis. J Immunol. 2003;170(9):4818–25. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.9.4818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Simonet WS, Lacey DL, Dunstan CR. Osteoprotegerin: a novel secreted protein involved in the regulation of bone density. Cell. 1997;89:309–319. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80209-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yun TJ, Chaudhary PM, Shu GL. OPG/FDCR-1, a TNF receptor family member, is expressed in lymphoid cells and is up-regulated by ligating CD40. J Immunol. 1998;161:6113–6121. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hofbauer LC, Khosla S, Dunstan CR. The roles of osteoprotegerin and osteoprotegerin ligand in the paracrine regulation of bone resorption. J Bone Miner Res. 2000;15:2–12. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.1.2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Collin-Osdoby P, Rothe L, Anderson F. Receptor activator of NF-κB and osteoprotegerin expression by human microvascular endothelial cells, regulation by inflammatory cytokines, and role in human osteoclastogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:20659–20672. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M010153200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Browner WS, Lui LY, Cummings SR. Associations of serum osteoprotegrin levels with diabetes, stroke, bone density, fractures and mortality in elderly women. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2001;86:631–37. doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.2.7192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Schoppet M, Sattler AM, Schaefer JR, Herzum M, Maisch B, Hofbauer LC. Increased osteoprotegrin serum levels in men with coronary artery disease. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2003;88:1024–28. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-020775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Knudsen ST, Foss CH, Poulsen PL, Andersen NH, Mogensen CE, Rasmussen LM. Increased plasma concentrations of OPG in type 2 diabetic patients with microvascular complications. European Journal of Endocrinology. 2003;149:39–42. doi: 10.1530/eje.0.1490039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Skoumal M, Kolarz G, Haberhauer G, Woloszczuk W, Hawa G, Klingler A. Osteoprotegerin and the receptor activator of NF-kappa B ligand in the serum and synovial fluid. A comparison of patients with longstanding rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2005;26:63–69. doi: 10.1007/s00296-004-0579-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Simonini G, Masi L, Giani T, et al. Osteoprotegerin serum levels in Kawasaki disease: an additional potential marker in predicting children with coronary artery involvement. J Rheumatol. 2005;32:2233–2238. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bernstein CN, Sargent M, Leslie WD. Serum osteoprotegerin is increased in crohn’s disease: a population-based case control study. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2005;11:325–330. doi: 10.1097/01.mib.0000164015.60795.ca. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kiani AN, Johnson K, Chen C, Diehl E, Hu H, Vasudevan G, Singh S, Magder LS, Knechtle SJ, Petri M. Urine Osteoprotegrin (OPG) and Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 (MCP-1) in Lupus Nephritis (LN) Journal of Rheumatology. 2009;36:2224–2230. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.081112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jono S, Ikari Y, Shioi A, et al. Serum osteoprotegerin levels are associated with the presence and severity of coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2002;106:1192–1194. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000031524.49139.29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Schoppet M, Sattler AM, Schaefer JR, Herzum M, Maisch B, Hofbauer LC. Increased osteoprotegerin serum levels in men with coronary artery disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:1024–1028. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-020775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Park YJ, Shin YJ, Kim WU, Cho CS. Prediction of subclinical atherosclerosis by serum osteoprotegerin in premenopausal women with systemic lupus erythematous: correlation of osteoprotegerin with monocyte chemotactic protein-1. Lupus. 2014;23:236–44. doi: 10.1177/0961203313517151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Breland UM, Hollan I, Saatvedt K, Almdahl SM, Damås JK, Yndestad A, Mikkelsen K, Førre OT, Aukrust P, Ueland T. Inflammatory markers in patients with coronary artery disease with and without inflammatory rheumatic disease. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2010;49:1118–27. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Petri M, Kiani AN, Post W, Christopher-Stine L, Magder LS. Lupus Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (LAPS) Annals of Rheumatic Diseases. 2011;70:760–5. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.136762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Budoff MJ, Georgiou D, Brody A, Agatston AS, Kennedy J, Wolfkiel C. Ultrafast computed tomography as a diagnostic modality in the detection of coronary artery disease: a multicenter disease: a multicenter study. Circulation. 1996;93:898–904. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.93.5.898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kopp AF, Ohnesorge B, Becker C, Schroder S, Heuschmid M, Kuttner A, Kuzo R, Claussen CD. Reproducibility and accuracy of coronary calcium measurements with multidetector row versus electron-beam CT. Radiology. 2002;225:113–119. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2251010173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bots ML, Mulder PG, Hofman A. Reproducibility of carotid vessel wall thickness easurements: the Rotterdam study. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47:921–930. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90196-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Smilde TJ, Wollersheim H, Van Langen H. Reproducibility of ultrasonographic measurements of different carotid and femoral artery segments in healthy subjects and in patients with increased intima-media thickness. Clin Sci. 1997;93:317–324. doi: 10.1042/cs0930317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Roman MJ, Crow MK, Lockshin MD, Paget SA, Levine DM, Davis A, Salmon JE. Rate and determinants of progression of atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56:3412–9. doi: 10.1002/art.22924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Thompson T, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Wildman RP, Kao A, Fitzgerald SG, Shook B, Tracy RP, Kuller LH, Brockwell S, Manzi S. Progression of carotid intima-media thickness and plaque in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:835–42. doi: 10.1002/art.23196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ueland T, Aukrust P, Dahl CP, Husebye T. Osteoprotegrin levels predict mortality in patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. J Intern Med. 2011;270:452–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2011.02393.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kwok SK, Shin YJ, Kim HJ, Kim HS, Kim JY, Yoo SA, Choi JJ, Kim WU, Cho CS. Circulating osteoprotegerin levels are elevated and correlated with antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2009;18:133–8. doi: 10.1177/0961203308094819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Szulc P, Hofbauer LC, Heufelder AE, Roth S, Delmas PD. Osteoprotegerin serum levels in men: correlation with age, estrogen, and testosterone status. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:3162–3165. doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.7.7657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Khosla S, Arrighi HM, Melton LJ, 3rd, et al. Correlates of osteoprotegerin levels in women and men. Osteoporos Int. 2002;13:394–399. doi: 10.1007/s001980200045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Van Campenhout A, Golledge J. Osteoprotegerin, vascular calcification and atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 2009;204:321–9. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2008.09.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sandberg WJ, Yndestad A, Oie E, et al. Enhanced T-cell expression of RANK ligand in acute coronary syndrome: possible role in plaque destabilization. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26:857–63. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000204334.48195.6a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Beyazal MS, Erdoğan T, Devrimsel G, Türkyılmaz AK, Cüre MC, Beyazal M, Sahin I. Relationship of osteoprotegerin to pulse wave velocity and carotid intima-media thickness in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Z Rheumatol. 2016;75:723–8. doi: 10.1007/s00393-015-1675-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kim SM, Lee J, Ryu OH, Lee KW, Kim HY, Seo JA, Kim SG, Kim NH, Baik SH, Choi DS, Choi KM. Serum osteoprotegerin levels are associated with inflammation and pulse wave velocity. Clin Endocrinol. 2005;63:594–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2005.02390.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Summey BT, Yosipovitch G. Glucocorticoid induced bone loss in dermatologic patients: an update. Arch Dermatol. 2006;142:82–90. doi: 10.1001/archderm.142.1.82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]