Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2017 Apr 20;7:46579. doi: 10.1038/srep46579

Molecular differentiation of five Cinnamomum camphora chemotypes using desorption atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry of raw leaves

Xiali Guo 1,2,*, Meng Cui 1,2,*, Min Deng 1,2, Xingxing Liu 1,2, Xueyong Huang 1,2, Xinglei Zhang 3, Liping Luo 1,2,a
PMCID: PMC5397862  PMID: 28425482

Abstract

Five chemotypes, the isoborneol-type, camphora-type, cineole-type, linalool-type and borneol-type of Cinnamomum camphora (L.) Presl have been identified at the molecular level based on the multivariate analysis of mass spectral fingerprints recorded from a total of 750 raw leaf samples (i.e., 150 leaves equally collected for each chemotype) using desorption atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry (DAPCI-MS). Both volatile and semi-volatile metabolites of the fresh leaves of C. camphora were simultaneously detected by DAPCI-MS without any sample pretreatment, reducing the analysis time from half a day using conventional methods (e.g., GC-MS) down to 30 s. The pattern recognition results obtained using principal component analysis (PCA) was cross-checked by cluster analysis (CA), showing that the difference visualized by the DAPCI-MS spectral fingerprints was validated with 100% accuracy. The study demonstrates that DAPCI-MS meets the challenging requirements for accurate differentiation of all the five chemotypes of C. camphora leaves, motivating more advanced application of DAPCI-MS in plant science and forestry studies.

Chemotypes are organisms categorized under the same species, subspecies or varieties, with differences in the composition of secondary metabolites1. Minor genetic and epigenetic changes with little or no effect on morphology or anatomy may produce large changes in the chemical phenotype. It is a widespread phenomenon that chemotypes are diverse in medicinal plants2,3,4,5,6,7. For example, the chemotypes which produce highly qualified essential oil products have been discovered in numerous species of plants5,7,8,9,10 including mint, elsholtzia, camphor, basil, houttuynia and patchouli etc. Therefore, classification of natural plants according to the chemotypes is essentially important for both industrial production and academic research.

Cinnamomum camphora (L.) Presl is native to the south of the Yangtze River in China, and has been introduced to many other countries11,12. C. camphora has long been prescribed in traditional Chinese herb medicines for the treatment of inflammation-related diseases such as rheumatism, sprains, bronchitis, asthma, indigestion, muscle pains and lasioderma serricorne11,13. Roots, stems, leaves and wood of C. camphora are all rich in essential oil which contains chemicals such as camphor, linalool, safrole and cineole as the major valuable ingredients14,15. Accordingly, C. camphora is of increasing importance as a source of essential oil in recent years, especially for the production of natural linalool which is still preferred over the synthetic form for fragrant applications16. Significant phytochemical variation has been found in the main constituents of essential oil originating from C. camphora trees of varied chemotypes such as the isoborneol-type, camphora-type, cineole-type, linalool-type and borneol-type17,18. However, there is no significant difference in morphology among all the five chemotypes. This makes it extremely difficult for accurately classifing C. camphora chemotypes with sensory methods accordingly.

In traditional processes, the typical extraction processes such as hydrodistillation, soxhlet, steam distillation, simultaneous distillation and extraction (SDE)19,20,21 are required before optical spectroscopy22, gas chromatography (GC)23, gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS)19 or Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy24 can be employed to detect the volatile and phenolic compounds from plants prior to the recognition of their chemotypes. Clearly, adding pretreatment processes increases cost of the analytical time, consumption of the sample and uncertainty of the results.

Requiring no tedious sample pretreatment, desorption atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry (DAPCI-MS) has been used for the direct analysis of various samples without separating the complex matrices25,26,27. For example, the application of DAPCI-MS for trace detection of melamine in milk, eggs and kidney stone samples28,29,30, discovery of sinapine in radish root31, differentiation of tea products32, fruits of Fructus schisandrae33 and raw propolis34 have been documented in the literature with dramatically improved analytical throughput. In the previous work12, products such as combs made of materials containing no camphor chemicals were successfully differentiated from the genuine ones by DAPCI-MS, inspiring attempts to utilize DAPCI-MS for classification of C. camphora chemotypes with raw leaves. To the best of our knowledge, no similar studies have been reported on the direct discrimination of chemotypes of plants, including C. camphora by either DAPCI-MS or other techniques based on ambient mass spectrometry.

In this study, DAPCI-MS was used to rapidly fingerprint the chemotypes of C. camphora leaves. The principal component analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis (CA) of the DAPCI-MS spectral fingerprint data were carried out to draw the 3-dimensional (3D) score plots, which visualized the differentiation of the five chemotypes of C. camphora leaf samples.

Results and Discussion

Desorption atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry analysis of C. camphora leaves

In order to maintain a stable signal at the maximal level, the DAPCI working parameters (Fig. 1) were experimentally optimized as described in methods, including the distance and angle between the sample and the tip in DAPCI source, voltage, and the temperature. Under the optimized experimental conditions, the DAPCI mass spectra for all camphor fresh leaves were recorded. The acceptable stability and reproducibility were observed based on repeatable mass spectra of different samples. For example, for given signals at m/z 135, 137, and 153, the signal intensity levels were varied within a reasonably narrow range, giving relative standard deviation (RSD) values of 3.8∼6.2% for every 10 measurements. The RSD values were also found to be increased from 3.8∼6.2% to about 8∼12% for the same leaf sample but measured in 3 days, which was still reasonable for measuring the untreated raw leaf samples with DAPCI-MS. For a large amount of sample analysis, the analysis time for the whole sample set might last for several weeks. For such a long time, it could be helpful to correct the baseline drift or any other notable variation of the instruments using a standard amino acid solution (ca 10 ppb).

Figure 1. Schematic illustration of DAPCI setup for mass spectrometry analysis of raw fresh leaf samples.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Chemical profiling of C. camphora raw leaves by DAPCI-MS

The DAPCI-MS fingerprints of 5 chemotypes of C. camphora leaves were shown in Fig. 2. Obviously, the spectra of the linalool-type (Fig. 2a), isoborneol-type (Fig. 2d), cineole-type (Fig. 2e), and camphora-type (Fig. 2c) leaves showed quite a broad diversity, while the borneol-type (Fig. 2b) and camphora-type (Fig. 2c) showed high similarity in the chemical fingerprints. Cineole-type displayed the lowest number of signals (four major peaks). Isoborneol-type displayed the largest number of signals (18 major peaks). For the most spectra, the molecules of relatively low molecular weight were detected as the protonated molecules between m/z 100 and 280. For instance, the main peaks were m/z 135, 137, 153, 172, 188, 230 in the spectra of linalool-type leaves. In the spectrum of the borneol-type, the main peaks were m/z 170, 155, 172, 102, 119 while abundant peaks at m/z 170, 153 and small peaks at m/z 137, 188 etc. were detected in the camphora-type leaves. In the cineole-type spectral fingerprints, the signal intensity of the peak at m/z 155 was the strongest, reflecting that cineole (MW 154) naturally was of the highest content in the cineole-type essential oil15,18. It is widely known that the different medicinal properties of these 5 C. camphora chemotypes arise from the diversity of their chemical composition. In the results mentioned above, detailed chemical differences in their leaves were acquired with DAPCI-MS, providing an explicit statistic base for traditional usage of C. camphora chemotypes previously identified mainly by sensor methods with low precision and accuracy. On the other hand, major MS peaks can be selected as specific markers for the identification of each C. camphora chemotype. Given the high cost of MS analysis, selection of several characteristic compounds out of a large set of spectrum data as identification markers is obviously highly practical. To address this issue, our studies on C. camphora chemotypes using DAPCI-MS could provide a novel insight in terms of feasibility, efficiency and accuracy.

Figure 2. DAPCI-MS spectral fingerprints of fresh C. camphora leaves obtained from 5 chemotypes.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a) linalool-type; (b) borneol-type; (c) camphora-type; (d) isoborneol-type; (e) cineole-type.

The MS2 spectrum of the ions at m/z 137 was shown in Fig. 3a, which was tentatively assigned to protonated pinene. The major fragment ions at m/z 109, 95 and m/z 81 were generated from ions of m/z 137, probably by the loss of neutral fragments of C2H4, C3H6 and C4H8, respectively. Further fragmentation for the ions of m/z 109 produced the ionic fragments of m/z 95, 81 and 67, probably due to the loss of neutral fragments of CH2, C2H4, C3H6, respectively. These fragments fully matched the data obtained using a proton transfer reaction ion trap mass spectrometry by other groups35 and the data of authentic pinene compound using DAPCI-MS by our group (Figure S1), confirming the successful detection of pinene from the fresh leaf samples.

Figure 3. DAPCI tandem mass spectra of analyte ions of interest.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

DAPCI-MS3 spectrum of (a) pinene (m/z 137); (b) [M + NH4]+ (m/z 170); (c) camphor (m/z 153); (d) linalool (m/z 155); (e) cineole (m/z 155); (f) borneol (m/z 155).

Camphor (MW152, m/z 153) was the highest content reaching more than 30% in the camphora-type essential oil, and up to 10% in the borneol-type. Under the open air corona discharge conditions, camphor molecule forms adducts with ambient ammonia easily. For example, the abundant peak at m/z 170 present from the camphora-type samples was identified as the protonated ammonia adduct with camphor [M + NH4]+. Upon the collision-induced dissociation (CID) process, the precursor ions of m/z 170 yielded the protonated camphor at m/z 153 (Fig. 3b). Such daughter ions (m/z 153) produced the characteristic fragmentation pattern (inset of Fig. 3b), which was identical to that generated by the protonated camphor (Fig. 3c). For example, as shown in Fig. 3c, the protonated camphor (m/z 153) produced major fragment ions at m/z 135, 109, and 95 by loss of H2O, C2H4O, and C3H6O, respectively. The fragmentation pattern was consistent with the results of electron impact (EI) ionization12,36. Furthermore, the fragmentation pattern has been validated using authentic compound of Camphora, and the fragmentation pattern of protonated camphora (m/z 153) was shown in Figure S2.

The 3 isomer compounds of linalool, cineole and borneol are the most characteristic volatile components18 in the linalool-type, cineole-type and borneol-type C. camphora leaves, respectively. In the positive ion mode, these compounds (MW 154) were detectable as the protonated molecules [M + H]+ at m/z 155. According to Shu et al.37, linalool generated major peaks at m/z 155 [M + H]+, and 137 [M + H-H2O]+, accompanied by small peaks at m/z 111, 109, and 95, by the loss of C2H2, C2H4, and C3H6 from the fragment of m/z 137, respectively. In this study, these ion peaks were also observed in the DAPCI-MS spectrum, as shown in Fig. 3d. These fragments were also detected from the authentic linalool, as shown in Figure S3, indicating the successful detection of linalool from the fresh leaves. Under the experimental conditions, the product ion spectrum of protonated cineole were similar to those observed in the linalool case (Fig. 3e), and the featured ionic fragments of cineole observed in MS3 spectrum were detected at m/z 81, 95, 108, 109 and 119 as shown in the inset of Fig. 3e. The major fragment ions were also detected with a similar pattern using authentic cineole (Figure S4). Similarly, the detection of borneol was also validated with authentic compound to match the CID fragments detected in the raw sample. Figure 3f showed the CID paths of the compound detected from the leaf sample, which matched the featured fragment ions of standard borneol as shown in Figure S5. These results were also in good agreement with those obtained with VAE-DLLME-GC-MS method38.

Principle component analysis of leaves of 5 C. camphora chemotypes

To visualize the molecular differences among the chemotypes of C. camphora, principal component analysis was performed for the DAPCI-MS spectral data with Matlab software. The 3D PCA score plot matrix was shown in Fig. 4. Three PCs (PC1 eigenvalue 31.3%, PC2 eigenvalue 23.1%, PC3 eigenvalue 21.9%) representing about 76.3% of the total variance, were selected for modeling. A total of 750 data points of samples from 5 C. camphora chemotypes were clustered tightly in the PCA plots (Fig. 4). However, the camphora-type and borneol-type occupied adjacent area, indicating that camphor leaves of the two chemotypes contained relatively similar volatile components. Furthermore, the blind samples of 5 leaves were tested using the same method, which indicated that all the 5 leaves belonged to the linalool-type. More interestingly, the GC-MS experiments performed on the 5 blind samples confirmed the results obtained using the method established here (data not shown), showing that DAPCI-MS combined with PCA could be used conveniently to differentiate C. camphora and could be a promising method to rapidly identify plant chemotypes.

Figure 4. Principal component analysis results of DAPCI-MS data from leaves of 5 C. camphora chemotypes.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(a) 3D plot of PCA score results; (b) PCA loading results for the PCs.

Cluster analysis of leaves of 5 C. camphora chemotypes

Cluster analysis (CA), an alternative data processing method to cluster abstract objects based on their similarities, was commonly used for classification of unknown samples32,39. In this study, CA was used to cross check the results of PCA for method validation since the results of CA are simple and intuitive40 in comparison with those obtained by PCA. Accordingly, a total of 750 DAPCI mass spectra recorded from 5 chemotypes of C. camphora samples were processed by CA using Matlab software. The Euclidean distance between each sample was 0–1.8 × 107 and the aggregation process was expressed in the diagram as shown in Fig. 5, in which 5 categories of the isoborneol-type, borneol-type, linalool-type, cineole-type and camphora-type generally were clearly classified. These results were in good agreement with those of PCA. Both in PCA and CA, the distances between borneol-type and camphora-type were the closest thus the differentiation between them was compromised to a certain degree. This could possibly reflect the similarities in their chemical properties. This point was also supported by a former study on volatile chemical compositions in leaves of different C. camphora chemotypes conducted with static headspace-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (SHS-GC-MS) that combined with multivariate analyses revealed a very close analogy of 6 volatile components (12 in total selected for mapping) in these two chemotypes18.

Figure 5. Dendrogram of the cluster analysis to validate the principal component analysis results.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

(A1-A5) linalool-type; (B1-B5) borneol-type; (C1-C5) camphora-type; (D1-D5) isoborneol-type; (E1-E5) cineole-type.

The capability of DAPCI-MS for many types of application including screening camphor wood products12 has been investigated by our group in recent years. However, the previously published work12 focused on differentiation of camphor wood products from other types of materials containing no camphor-wood-related chemicals. The current study further developed the method of DAPCI-MS for classification of C. camphora chemotypes. As already partially presented in this paper, the major work of this study is quite different from the previously published one12. Technically speaking, the difficulty of the current work is also much more challenging than the previous work12. Therefore, the previous work brings no hurt to the current manuscript in any degree.

Requiring no dedicated sample pretreatment, DAPCI-MS is fast to profile the chemical fingerprints of samples. This feature makes it suitable for high throughput applications such as differentiation of plant chemotypes. However, limited by the mass analyzer used in this work, it was not able to resolve many compounds, resulting in difficulties in identification of certain types of analytes. In comparison with either GC-MS or LC-MS, the matrix effect still plays a significant role in ambient ionization mass spectrometry such as DAPCI-MS, although in many cases enough information has been confidently obtained by DAPCI-MS with molecular specificity. This study demonstrated that DAPCI-MS in combination with PCA and CA was a feasible technique for high-throughput differentiation of raw leaves from various chemotypes of C. camphora. The technique was in the ambient environment without any sample pretreatment. Compared to traditional techniques, this technique detected the plant in stiu without any extraction of volatile and phenolic compounds. For headspace extraction method developed in recent years41,42, half an hour at least is needed for heating and equilibration, without regard for the subsequent GC-MS analysis. Furthermore, under field work conditions, especially for medical plants such as camphor trees harboring diverse chemotypes with highly morphological similarity, rapid and accurate identification of each chemotype should be of great help to researchers. The rapid method established here could provide a theoretical basis for a portable apparatus being produced in the future as the technology develops further.

Mass spectrometry has been increasingly employed for analysis of the same plant species. Fragni et al.43 investigated forty-one processed tomato samples coming from three different countries by Inductively Coupled Plasma orthogonal acceleration Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer (ICP-oa-TOF-MS), exploiting the characteristic of simultaneity of the measurements that is distinctive of this type of instrument. But the objects detected with this method were only metallic elements in plants. Kim et al. conducted direct analysis in real time–time of flight–mass spectrometry (DART–TOF–MS) fingerprinting on Dang-gui from Korean and Chinese markets for discriminating geographical origin of raw herbal medicine44. Each sample was ground to fine powder and passed through a sieve tube prior to analysis. However, our experiments were done in situ of the samples.

Conclusion

Conclusively, DAPCI is a “green” analytical tool requiring no toxic chemical reagent, with high sensitivity for detection of trace analytes in complex matrices and with high throughput due to no need of any sample pretreatment. As the sheath gas is not required in DAPCI-MS, it is of convenience to implement DAPCI-MS for in situ analysis, especially when a portable mass spectrometer installed with a miniaturized DAPCI source is used. Such a DAPCI-MS-based instrument has long been expected for wide application in plant science research, especially for classification the chemotypes of plants, as well as identification of secondary metabolites when the tandem mass spectrometry capability has been implemented in the instrument. As demonstrated in this work, DAPCI-MS would become a powerful analytical tool in many fields of plant science including identification and/or screening of plant chemotypes at the molecular level, showing promising applications on studies of traditional Chinese medicines and in situ analysis of Chinese herbs.

Materials and Methods

Materials

Fresh leaves of five chemotypes of C. camphora trees including the isoborneol-type, camphora-type, cineole-type, linalool-type and borneol-type were picked up at the same time from trees cultured at a trial field authorized by Camphor Engineering Technology Research Center of China National Forestry Administration, on July 28, 2014. The trees of six or seven years old were selected, with 2–4 m height, 21–26 cm diameter at breast height, and 2–3 m canopy. The chemotypes of each C. camphora tree has been identified prior to sample collection by Professor Xiangmei Jiang, the Center Director using a standard GC-MS method and transcriptome analysis17,18, and their chemotypes were confidently determined. Each chemotype was randomly picked from five trees with identified chemotypes, and each individual tree included five orientations, i.e. the east, south, west, north and middle branches. The branches were inserted into water to remain fresh and analyzed after no more than 24 hr.

Instruments and Working Conditions

All the experiments were carried out using a linear ion trap mass spectrometer (LTQ-XL, Thermo Scientific San Jose, CA) coupled with a homemade DAPCI source for ion generation. The Xcalibur® software was directly used for instrument control and mass spectral raw data display. The DAPCI ion source was placed 10 mm in front of the MS inlet capillary and set at 45° to the sample surface. The gap distance between the needle tip and the sample surface was set to be 1–3 mm, as shown in Fig. 1.

The DAPCI source and LTQ mass spectrometer were both set to run in the positive ion detection mode. The operational parameters such as the capillary voltage, the temperature of the heated capillary, and the tube lens voltage were set to be 15 V, 150 °C, and 65 V, respectively. A high voltage (+3.5 kV, with a discharge current of no more than 0.1 mA) was directly applied to the needle to generate a corona discharge, which produced plenty of primary radical cations and secondary cluster ions to impact the sample surface for desorption/ionization, resulting in analyte ions created under ambient conditions for post mass analysis. The analyte ions are then transferred into the LTQ mass analyzer for mass analysis via the ion guide system of the instrument. The analytical time for each sample was only 30 s. However, the CID mass spectra were averaged over a recording period of 1.6 min to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio of the CID data, followed by background subtraction. For CID experiments, up to MS3, the parent ions were selectively isolated with mass-to-charge window width of 1.5 units, and subjected to CID process by applying the collision energy (CE) of 10–30%.

The third expanded fresh leaves of the upper part of each branch in five chemotypes of C. camphora were detected in this experiment. The fresh leaves were torn into two pieces parallel with main veins, and the distance between the tear and the main vein was about 1 cm. The tears were placed under DAPCI ion source, as shown in Fig. 1, with manual injection, and the analysis of every sample was repeated three times.

Data analysis

PCA

PCA was performed using Matlab software (version 7.0, Mathworks, Inc., Natick, MA) to recognize the pattern of the raw mass spectral fingerprints. Each mass spectrum was exported to Microsoft Excel and saved as a file for further utilization. The m/z values were treated as independent variables and the relative intensities of the full-scan mass spectra (MS1) as the dependent variables in the Excel files. To ensure the quality of the statistical analysis, 25 pieces for each chemotype sample of C. camphora were collected, and every piece leaf was sampled for 6 times. Hence, there were a total of 750 mass spectra in the data set, which were assembled into an N × 750 matrix. The matrix could be directly used in Matlab software for PCA analysis, where N represents the total number of m/z values collected in the mass spectrum. The principal components for the output were automatically determined by Matlab software with the “princomp” function, and the accuracy for PCA (i.e., the factor indicating the accuracy of PCA results; the smaller the factor, the more reliable the results.) was set at a high level (1 × 10−8). The scores and loadings of the first three principal components (PCs) were 3D plotted in Matlab.

CA

The same data set used for PCA was directly processed with Matlab software (version 7.0, Mathworks, Inc., Natick, MA) for CA, which calculated the Euclidean distance between samples and conducted hierarchical clustering analysis to recognize the pattern based on the mass spectral raw data.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Guo, X. et al. Molecular differentiation of five Cinnamomum camphora chemotypes using desorption atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry of raw leaves. Sci. Rep. 7, 46579; doi: 10.1038/srep46579 (2017).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information
srep46579-s1.doc (522.5KB, doc)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the 12th Five-rural Areas of the National Science and Technology Plan Project (No. 2012BDA29B01), and the Research Program of State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Nanchang University (SKLF-ZZB-201516).

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Author Contributions L.L., X.G and X.L. designed the research; X.G, X.L. and M.C. analysed the experimental data and wrote the manuscript; L.L. and M.D. contributed significantly to the discussion of results; M.C., X.Z. and X.H. contributed to the manuscript refinement.

References

  1. Desjardins A. E. Natural product chemistry meets genetics: when is a genotype a chemotype? J. Agric. Food Chem. 56, 7587–7592 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Jalaei Z., Fattahi M. & Aramideh S. Allelopathic and insecticidal activities of essential oil of Dracocephalum kotschyi Boiss. from Iran: A new chemotype with highest limonene-10-al and limonene. Ind. Crops Prod. 73, 109–117 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  3. Sifi I., Gourine N., Gaydou E. M. & Yousfi M. Chemotypes of essential oil of unripe galls of Pistacia atlantica Desf. from Algeria. Nat. Prod. Res. 29, 1945–1949 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen J. J. et al. Chemotypic and genetic diversity in Epimedium sagittatum from different geographical regions of China. Phytochemistry 116, 180–187 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Usano-Alemany J., Palá-Paúl J. & Herráiz-Peñalver D. Comprehensive phenological description of essential-oil chemotypes of Salvia lavandulifolia VAHL grown under the same environmental conditions. Chem. Biodivers. 11, 1963–1977 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Guo D. D. et al. Expression patterns of three UGT genes in different chemotype safflower lines and under MeJA stimulus revealed their potential role in flavonoid biosynthesis. Plos One 11, e0158159; 10.1371/journal.pone.0158159 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hefendeh F. W. & Murray M. J. Monoterpene composition of a chemotype of Mentha piperita having high limonene. Planta Med. 23, 101–109 (1973). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Keefover-Ring K., Thompson J. D. & Linhart Y. B. Beyond six scents: defining a seventh Thymus vulgaris chemotype new to southern France by ethanol extraction. Flavour Frag. J. 24, 117–122 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  9. Guo Z. Q. et al. Elsholtzia: phytochemistry and biological activities. Chem. Cent. J. 6, 147 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Grayer R. J. et al. Infraspecific taxonomy and essential oil chemotypes in sweet basil, Ocimum basilicum. Phytochemistry 43, 1033–1039 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lee H. J. et al. In vitro anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative effects of Cinnamomum Camphora extracts. J. Ethnopharmacol. 103, 208–216 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhu L. et al. Differential analysis of camphor wood products by desorption atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 61, 547–552 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen H. P. et al. Chemical constituents and insecticidal activities of the essential oil of Cinnamomum camphora leaves against Lasioderma serricorne. J. Chem. 44, 1–5 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  14. Yang F. et al. Linalool, derived from Cinnamomum camphora (L.) Presl leaf extracts, possesses molluscicidal activity against Oncomelania hupensis and inhibits infection of Schistosoma japonicum. Parasite. Vector. 7, 445–457 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Singh R. & Jawaid T. Cinnamomum camphora (Kapur): Review. Pharmacogn. Mag. 4, 1–5 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  16. Orwa C., Mutua A. & Kindt R. Cinnamomum camphora. Agroforestry Database 40, 1–5 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  17. Jiang X. M., Wu Y. F., Xiao F. M., Xiong Z. Y. & Xu H. N. Transcriptome analysis for leaves of five chemical types in Cinnamomum camphora. Chin. J. Yi Chuan 36, 58–68 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Liu X. X. et al. Multivariate analyses of volatile chemical composition in leaves of different Cinnamomum camphora chemotypes. Chin. Bull Bot 49, 161–166 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  19. Rodríguez-Solana R., Salgado J. M., Domínguez J. M. & Cortés-Diégueza S. Comparison of soxhlet, accelerated solvent and supercritical fluid extraction techniques for volatile (GC–MS and GC/FID) and phenolic compounds (HPLC–ESI/MS/MS) from Lamiaceae Species. Phytochem. Anal. 26, 61–71 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Cai Z. et al. Conventional, ultrasound-assisted, and accelerated-solvent extractions of anthocyanins from purple sweet potatoes. Food Chem. 197, 266–272 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Cirlini M. et al. Phenolic and volatile composition of a dry spearmint (Mentha spicata L.) extract. Molecules 21, 1007; 10.3390/molecules21081007 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Julinai H. R. et al. Application of near-infrared spectroscopy in quality control and determination of adulteration of African essential oils. Phytochem. Anal. 17, 121–128 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Shi W. Y., Wen G. Y., Guo D. X., Long G. Y. & Liu Y. G. Study on chemical constituents of the essential oil and classification of types from Cinnamomum camphora. Acta Bot. Sin. 31, 209–214 (1989). [Google Scholar]
  24. Gudi G., Krähmer A., Krüger H., Hennig L. & Schulz H. Discrimination of fennel chemotypes applying IR and Raman spectroscopy: discovery of a new γ-asarone chemotype. J. Agric. Food Chem. 62, 3537–3547 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Chen H. W. et al. Surface desorption atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry for direct ambient sample analysis without toxic chemical contamination. J. Mass Spectrom. 42, 1045–1056 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Liang J. C., Hang Y. P., Chingin K., Hu L. H. & Chen H. W. Rapid differentiation of microbial cultures based on the analysis of headspace volatiles by atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry. RSC Adv. 4, 25326–25329 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhang X. L. et al. Tracing origins of complex pharmaceutical preparations using surface desorption atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 82, 8060–8070 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Yang S. P. et al. Detection of melamine in milk products by surface desorption atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 81, 2426–2436 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Yang S. P. et al. Imaging melamine in egg samples by surface desorption atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry. Chin. J. Anal. Chem. 37, 315–318 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Li J. Q. et al. Surface desorption atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry for detection of melamine in kidney stone samples. Chin. J. Anal. Chem. 38, 1325–1328 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  31. Huang D. J. et al. Sinapine detection in radish taproot using surface desorption atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 59, 2148–2156 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Chen H. W. et al. Rapid differentiation of tea products by surface desorption atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 55, 10093–10010 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Pi Z. F. et al. Differentiation of various kinds of Fructus schisandrae by surface desorption atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry combined with Principal Component Analysis. Anal. Chim. Acta 706, 285–290 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Huang X. Y. et al. Fast differential analysis of propolis using surface desorption atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry. Int. J. Anal. Chem. 176475, 10.1155/2015/176475 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Müller M., Mielke L. H., Breitenlechner M. & McLuckey S. A. MS/MS studies for the selective detection of isomeric biogenic VOCs using a Townsend Discharge Triple Quadrupole Tandem MS and a PTR-Linear Ion Trap MS. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2, 703–712 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  36. Teso Vilar E., García Fraile A., de la Moya Cerero S., Martínez-Ruiz P. & Moreno Jiménez F. Electron ionization mass spectral studies of bridgehead-substituted norbornan-2-ones: camphor derivatives. Rapid Commun. Mass Sp. 25, 395–409 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Shu Y. H., Kwok E. S. C., Tuazon E. C., Atkinson R. & Arey J. Products of the Gas-Phase reactions of linalool with OH radicals, NO3 radicals, and O3. Environ. Sci. Technol. 31, 896–904 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  38. Sereshti H., Ghiasi A., Naderloo M., Taghizadeh M. & Astaneh S. D. A. Vortex-assisted extraction in tandem with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction followed by GC-MS for determination of Achillea wilhelmsii essential oil. Anal. Methods 17, 6695–6701 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  39. Yi T. et al. Comparison of ten major constituents in seven types of processed tea using HPLC-DAD-MS followed by principal component and hierarchical cluster analysis. LWT - Food Sci. Technol 62, 194–201 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  40. Tan P. N., Steinbach M. & Kumar V. Introduction to Data Mining 487–568 (Pearson Addison Wesley, 2006). [Google Scholar]
  41. San Román I., Alonso M. L., Bartolomé L., Alonso R. M. & Fañanás R. Analytical strategies based on multiple headspace extraction for the quantitative analysis of aroma components in mushrooms. Talanta 123, 207–217 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhang C. Y. & Chai X. S. A novel multiple headspace extraction gas chromatographic method for measuring the diffusion coefficient of methanol in water and in olive oil. J. Chromatogr A 1385, 124–128 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Fragni R., Trifirò A. & Nucci A. Towards the development of a multi-element analysis by ICP-oa-TOF-MS for tracing the geographical origin of processed tomato products. Food Control 48, 96–101 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  44. Kim H. J. et al. DART–TOF–MS based metabolomics study for the discrimination analysis of geographical origin of Angelica gigas roots collected from Korea and China. Metabolomics 11, 64–70 (2015). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information
srep46579-s1.doc (522.5KB, doc)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES