Abstract
Premise of the study:
Transcriptome-derived simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers were developed in Asparagus cochinchinensis (Asparagaceae). Due to its application in traditional medicine, its wild populations are threatened by over-collection even in protected areas, requiring immediate conservation efforts.
Methods and Results:
Based on transcriptome data of A. cochinchinensis, 96 primer pairs with two to seven alleles per locus were selected for initial validation; of those, 27 primer pairs amplified across all samples, resulting in 15 polymorphic and 12 monomorphic microsatellite markers. The usefulness of these markers was assessed in 60 individuals representing three populations of A. cochinchinensis. Observed and expected heterozygosity values ranged from 0.050 to 0.950 and 0.049 to 0.626, respectively. Cross-species amplification of the 27 markers was tested in the related species A. rigidulus and A. schoberioides.
Conclusions:
These polymorphic, transcriptome-derived SSR markers can be used as molecular markers to study population genetics and ecological conservation in A. cochinchinensis and related taxa.
Keywords: Asparagaceae, Asparagus cochinchinensis, EST-SSR markers, genetic diversity, medicinal plant
The genus Asparagus L. (Asparagaceae) comprises approximately 200 species distributed worldwide. The genus includes highly valuable plant species that have therapeutic properties and are also consumed as food (Shasnay et al., 2003). Asparagus cochinchinensis (Lour.) Merr. is distributed in northeastern Asia (Xiong et al., 2011) and has been used in traditional medicine in Korea and China (Lee et al., 2009). The tuberous roots of this plant have various medicinal properties including anti-inflammatory (Lee et al., 2015), antibacterial, and antipyretic qualities (Samad et al., 2013). In addition, previous research has also demonstrated that A. cochinchinensis has antitumor properties, particularly targeting lung cancer (Zhang and Jin, 2016). Such uses have led to a great demand for this plant, increasing the risk of extinction in this species due to over-collection of its wild populations (Jiang et al., 2010). Asparagus cochinchinensis is recorded in several protected areas in China (Information Center for the Environment, 2013), but information about its population size in the existing protected areas remains insufficient (International Union for the Conservation of Nature, 2016). Therefore, the genetic diversity and population structure of A. cochinchinensis requires immediate investigation to establish a conservation strategy.
Despite the ecological and medical importance of A. cochinchinensis, the genetic diversity in wild populations of this species is yet to be evaluated. Accordingly, polymorphic microsatellite markers in A. cochinchinensis were developed based on expressed sequence tag (EST) data obtained from Illumina paired-end sequencing. Simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers derived from ESTs are a powerful molecular tool for exploring genetic diversity and high level of transferability (Xu et al., 2014; Zhou et al., 2016). To the best of our knowledge, the current study is the first to profile the leaf transcriptome of A. cochinchinensis to generate EST-SSR markers. The usefulness of these markers was assessed in 60 individuals from three populations of A. cochinchinensis in Korea, Taiwan, and Japan. Cross-amplification of polymorphic microsatellite markers was performed in two related species (n = 8, for each species), A. rigidulus Nakai and A. schoberioides Kunth.
METHODS AND RESULTS
Sixty individuals of A. cochinchinensis were collected from wild populations in three countries (Korea, Taiwan, and Japan). Voucher specimens were deposited in the Herbarium of the National Institute of Biological Resources (KB) and the Herbarium of Hallym University (HHU), Republic of Korea (Appendix 1). To test cross-species amplification of the markers, we sampled eight individuals of each A. rigidulus and A. schoberioides (Appendix 1).
For RNA library construction, total RNA was extracted from a leaf of a single plant collected from Korea (voucher no: NIBRVP0000556138; Appendix 1). We constructed Illumina-compatible transcriptome libraries using a TruSeq RNA Library Preparation Kit version 2 (Illumina, San Diego, California, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, mRNA was purified from total RNA by polyA selection, then chemically fragmented and converted to single-stranded cDNA by random hexamer-priming. A second cDNA strand was generated to create a double-stranded cDNA for TruSeq library construction. The short double-stranded cDNA fragments were then connected using sequencing adapters. Finally, the RNA libraries were quantified using real-time PCR (qPCR), according to the qPCR Quantification Protocol Guide (Illumina), and validated using an Agilent 2200 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, California, USA).
The cDNA library was sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform. All raw reads have been deposited to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (SRA; accession no. SRP100733). The de novo transcriptome assembly of these reads was performed using the short read assembling program Trinity r20140717 (Haas et al., 2013) with the default parameters. To detect SSR motifs containing two to six nucleotides, the Perl script MicroSAtellite Identification Tool (MISA) version 1.0.0 (Thiel et al., 2003) was applied with thresholds of 10 repeat units for dinucleotides, and five repeat units for tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexanucleotides. MISA identified 20,104 microsatellite sequences, of which 96 loci were selected depending on the number of SSR repeats and primer depths for further testing of A. cochinchinensis. The primer sets were designed to flank the microsatellite-rich regions with a minimum of six repeats using Primer3 (Rozen and Skaletsky, 1999).
Whole genomic DNA was extracted from leaves of 60 individuals from three populations of A. cochinchinensis (including the specimen used to generate the transcriptome) and 16 individuals from two other Asparagus species (A. rigidulus and A. schoberioides) using a DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, California, USA). Three individuals from each population were selected to amplify the 96 markers. To test polymorphism of microsatellite markers, PCR amplifications were performed using 2.5 μL of 10× Ex Taq buffer (TaKaRa Bio, Otsu, Japan), 2 μL of 2.5 mM dNTPs, 0.01 μM of each forward and reverse primers, 0.1 μL of Ex Taq DNA polymerase (5 units/μL) (TaKaRa Bio), 5–10 ng template DNA, and distilled water (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, Missouri, USA) in a final volume of 25 μL. PCR was carried out in a GeneAmp PCR System 9700 thermocycler (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, California, USA) using the following program: initial denaturation step at 98°C for 5 min; followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 1 min, annealing at 55–57°C for 1 min (Table 1), and extension at 72°C for 1.5 min; and a final extension step at 72°C for 10 min. Fluorescently labeled (HEX, FAM) PCR products were analyzed by an automated sequencer (ABI 3730XL) with GeneScan 500 LIZ Size Standard (Applied Biosystems), genotyping was performed using GeneMapper version 3.7 (Applied Biosystems), and peaks were scored manually by visual inspection. The genetic diversity parameters of polymorphic loci, namely the number of alleles, observed heterozygosity, expected heterozygosity, and Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, were calculated using GenAlEx 6.5 (Peakall and Smouse, 2012).
Table 1.
Characteristics of 15 polymorphic microsatellite loci developed for Asparagus cochinchinensis and tested for this study.
| Locus | Primer sequences (5′–3′) | Repeat motif | Allele size range (bp) | Fluorescent dye | Ta (°C) | GenBank accession no. | Putative function [Organism] | E-value |
| AC008 | F: GAAGCGAGGGGAGATTCTGG | (TC)6 | 205–213 | HEX | 55 | Pr032824981 | Predicted: uncharacterized protein LOC102705341 [Oryza brachyantha] | 2E-35 |
| R: AACTGGTGAAGGTCGTGGAC | ||||||||
| AC011 | F: TGTGCGGTCGACTGAATTGA | (TA)7 | 170–222 | FAM | 57 | Pr032824995 | Not found | — |
| R: GAGGCTACACACTCCCAAGG | ||||||||
| AC014 | F: CACGTTGTGAGTGGGTCTGA | (GT)7 | 216–250 | FAM | 55 | Pr032824986 | Not found | — |
| R: CTCAGGATGCTCTCGATGCA | ||||||||
| AC017 | F: CAAAAACCCAGCTGGCAGAC | (GA)8 | 235–239 | HEX | 57 | Pr032824988 | DEA(D/H)-box RNA helicase family protein isoform 3 [Theobroma cacao] | 9E-132 |
| R: CCGCAAGTGAGGAGAGGTTT | ||||||||
| AC020 | F: AATTATGAGACGCGCCGCTA | (GA)10 | 154–176 | HEX | 57 | Pr032824993 | Hypothetical protein OsI_20242 [Oryza sativa Indica Group] | 2E-37 |
| R: AGCAGAACGAGCGTCAGAAA | ||||||||
| AC041 | F: GAGAGACAGCGTGTGTGTGA | (AG)8 | 238–278 | FAM | 55 | Pr032824994 | Not found | — |
| R: ACCAGGGCACAAGACACAAT | ||||||||
| AC050 | F: CCTCACCTCAAAGGCCATGT | (TTC)7 | 184–196 | FAM | 57 | Pr032824971 | Predicted: homeobox protein BEL1 homolog isoform X3 [Glycine max] | 8E-120 |
| R: TCCGGCATTCTGAAAAGCCT | ||||||||
| AC053 | F: GGTGATGGTTCTGCTGGACA | (TGC)6 | 336–339 | FAM | 55 | Pr032824989 | Predicted: uncharacterized protein LOC103340883 [Prunus mume] | 0.0 |
| R: TCGCGCAACTGTTTCACAAG | ||||||||
| AC065 | F: CGCGATGATCATTTGCAGCA | (GCA)7 | 201–216 | HEX | 55 | Pr032824972 | Predicted: myb-related protein Zm1-like [Brachypodium distachyon] | 1E-33 |
| R: GAGCAAGGTCGAGATACCCG | ||||||||
| AC069 | F: AGGGCTAGGGTTTTGGTTCG | (GAC)6 | 215–236 | FAM | 55 | Pr032824975 | Not found | — |
| R: TCCTTCTCTTCGCTCATGGC | ||||||||
| AC079 | F: GCTTTCGGAGGGGGAAGAAA | (CCG)6 | 222–237 | FAM | 55 | Pr032824980 | Predicted: 3-isopropylmalate dehydrogenase, chloroplastic-like [Setaria italica] | 0.0 |
| R: GAAGCGGCGAGAGAGAGTAC | ||||||||
| AC082 | F: TGCCAAAGGAGAAGCTGGTT | (CAG)6 | 357–363 | HEX | 55 | Pr032824990 | Putative adenosine kinase family protein [Populus trichocarpa] | 2E-111 |
| R: GGATGGAGGCCTAGACTTGC | ||||||||
| AC084 | F: GACACATGTCCTCCAGCACA | (CAA)7 | 244–259 | HEX | 57 | Pr032824969 | Predicted: IST1-like protein-like [Brachypodium distachyon] | 2E-48 |
| R: TACTCATTTCATCCCCCGCG | ||||||||
| AC085 | F: CCTGAAGGCGAAGTTACCGA | (ATT)7 | 225–228 | HEX | 55 | Pr032824991 | Not found | — |
| R: CTCAACGTCAGGAGCGAAGA | ||||||||
| AC086 | F: GCAACCTCTCCTTTGACGGA | (ATC)7 | 234–243 | HEX | 55 | Pr032824970 | Hypothetical protein POPTR_0015s00560g, partial [Populus trichocarpa] | 3E-122 |
| R: CGAGTCTCGTTGGGGCTAAA |
Note: Ta = annealing temperature.
The results showed that 27 markers could be successfully amplified (Table 1, Appendix 2), and size polymorphism in A. cochinchinensis was detected in 15 markers (Tables 1, 2). Functional annotations for these 27 markers were performed to a subset of ESTs with BLASTX score (E-value < 1 × 10−10) using the GO database (www.geneontology.org). Fifteen microsatellite markers were polymorphic in A. cochinchinensis, with the number of alleles per locus ranging from two to seven. The observed heterozygosity and expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.050 to 0.950 and 0.049 to 0.626, respectively (Table 3). Of these polymorphic loci, seven loci significantly deviated from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium within the populations (Table 3). Transferability of microsatellite loci was tested in eight individuals each of A. rigidulus and A. schoberioides (Table 2). Of the 12 markers that were monomorphic in A. cochinchinensis, four loci (AC016, AC032, AC047, and AC093) were polymorphic in A. rigidulus and A. schoberioides, with the remaining loci amplifying consistently across both related taxa (Appendix 2).
Table 2.
Genetic diversity data of 15 polymorphic microsatellite loci developed for Asparagus cochinchinensis in A. rigidulus and A. schoberioides populations.a
| Asparagus rigidulus (N = 8) | Asparagus schoberioides (N = 8) | |||
| Locus | A | Allele size range (bp) | A | Allele size range (bp) |
| AC008 | — | — | — | — |
| AC011 | 1 | 170 | 3 | 170–220 |
| AC014 | 1 | 250 | 1 | 250 |
| AC017 | 3 | 235–239 | 2 | 235–237 |
| AC020 | 2 | 156–176 | 2 | 154–176 |
| AC041 | — | — | 1 | 240 |
| AC050 | 2 | 184–193 | 1 | 193 |
| AC053 | 1 | 339 | 1 | 339 |
| AC065 | 1 | 201 | 2 | 201–213 |
| AC069 | 2 | 224–227 | 2 | 224–230 |
| AC079 | 2 | 222–225 | 4 | 222–234 |
| AC082 | 3 | 357–363 | 2 | 357–360 |
| AC084 | 1 | 247 | 2 | 247–256 |
| AC085 | 1 | 228 | 1 | 228 |
| AC086 | 3 | 234–240 | 2 | 234–237 |
Note: A = number of alleles; He = expected heterozygosity; Ho = observed heterozygosity; N = number of individuals.
Voucher and locality information are provided in Appendix 1.
Table 3.
Genetic diversity in three Asparagus cochinchinensis populationsa based on the 15 polymorphic microsatellite markers.
| Korea (N = 20) | Taiwan (N = 20) | Japan (N = 20) | |||||||
| Locus | A | Ho | Heb | A | Ho | Heb | A | Ho | Heb |
| AC008 | 3 | 0.100 | 0.486** | 4 | 0.200 | 0.588** | 2 | 0.000 | 0.095** |
| AC011 | 3 | 0.950 | 0.564** | 3 | 0.950 | 0.599** | 2 | 0.737 | 0.499* |
| AC014 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 2 | 0.105 | 0.100 | 2 | 0.800 | 0.480** |
| AC017 | 2 | 0.300 | 0.375 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 2 | 0.900 | 0.495** |
| AC020 | 2 | 0.250 | 0.219 | 2 | 0.150 | 0.139 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| AC041 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 7 | 0.650 | 0.524 | 3 | 0.947 | 0.605** |
| AC050 | 2 | 0.053 | 0.145** | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| AC053 | 2 | 0.050 | 0.049 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| AC065 | 3 | 0.200 | 0.184 | 3 | 0.400 | 0.331 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| AC069 | 2 | 0.313 | 0.498 | 4 | 0.357 | 0.605** | 2 | 0.000 | 0.391** |
| AC079 | 3 | 0.400 | 0.339 | 4 | 0.750 | 0.626 | 3 | 0.579 | 0.589 |
| AC082 | 2 | 0.278 | 0.424 | 2 | 0.125 | 0.117 | 2 | 0.200 | 0.180 |
| AC084 | 2 | 0.500 | 0.480 | 2 | 0.100 | 0.095 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| AC085 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 2 | 0.150 | 0.139 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| AC086 | 2 | 0.211 | 0.188 | 3 | 0.250 | 0.224 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Mean | 1.842 | 0.190 | 0.208 | 2.368 | 0.220 | 0.215 | 1.526 | 0.219 | 0.175 |
Note: A = number of alleles; He = expected heterozygosity; Ho = observed heterozygosity; N = number of individuals.
Voucher and locality information are provided in Appendix 1.
Significant deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium after Bonferroni correction for multiple tests (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS
Cross-species amplification of microsatellite markers is a time-saving as well as cost-effective approach for developing locus-specific markers for new species. In this study, a total of 27 markers were developed, of which 15 novel polymorphic markers were used for the medicinal plant A. cochinchinensis. These markers were successfully used for cross-amplification in A. rigidulus and A. schoberioides. These markers are an important tool for the development of effective strategies that can be used to study genetic diversity and genetic structure of A. cochinchinensis and related species.
Appendix 1.
Voucher information for Asparagus cochinchinensis, A. rigidulus, and A. schoberioides populations sampled in this study.
| Species | Country | Locality | n | Geographic coordinates | Voucher no. (Herbarium)a |
| A. cochinchinensis (Lour.) Merr. | Korea | Yeonggwang, Jeonnam | 20 | 35°23′29.7″N, 126°24′34.3″E | NIBRVP0000556138 (KB) |
| Taiwan | Ruifang, Keelung | 20 | 25°07′29.0″N, 121°55′17.4″E | NIBRVP0000556140 (KB) | |
| Japan | Kunigami, Okinawa | 20 | 26°30′16.9″N, 127°51′03.0″E | NIBRVP0000601493 (KB) | |
| A. rigidulus Nakai | Korea | Namhae, Gyeongnam | 8 | 34°43′43.7″N, 127°51′35.7″E | 2016ASP092 (HHU) |
| A. schoberioides Kunth | Korea | Goesan, Chungbuk | 8 | 36°47′45.2″N, 128°01′44.9″E | NIBRVP0000601489 (KB) |
Note: n = number of individuals sampled.
Voucher specimens were deposited in the Herbarium of the National Institute of Biological Resources (KB) and the Herbarium of Hallym University (HHU), Republic of Korea.
Appendix 2.
Characteristics of 12 monomorphic microsatellite loci developed for Asparagus cochinchinensis and tested in the related species A. rigidulus and A. schoberioides.
| Locus | Primer sequences (5′–3′) | Repeat motif | Allele size range (bp) | Fluorescent dye | Ta (°C) | GenBank accession no. | Putative function [Organism] | E-value |
| AC016a | F: GATCGATGTCTCCCGAACCC | (GA)9 | 254–266 | HEX | 55 | Pr032824977 | Hypothetical protein MTR_3g065210 [Medicago truncatula] | 3E-09 |
| R: GTCGCTTCTTGACCCACAGA | ||||||||
| AC029b | F: AAATGAGCTGCCACCTCACA | (CA)9 | 177 | FAM | 55 | Pr032824973 | Not found | — |
| R: AACGGTCCCCCACTTGAAAA | ||||||||
| AC030b | F: CCGGTGAATCTCTCCGACTG | (CA)7 | 245 | FAM | 55 | Pr032824987 | Unnamed protein product [Coffea canephora] | 3E-49 |
| R: CTCTCGGTCCAAAGATCCGG | ||||||||
| AC032a | F: TCCATGTGCTTGTGTTTGCG | (CA)6 | 262–266 | FAM | 55 | Pr032824976 | Unnamed protein product [Vitis vinifera] | 2E-155 |
| R: TTGCTCTGCTCTGTGTGTGT | ||||||||
| AC047a | F: AACGACGGCCACTCAAATCT | (AC)8 | 193–195 | HEX | 55 | Pr032824983 | Not found | — |
| R: GGATCGTGGAACTTGCATGC | ||||||||
| AC054b | F: ATCATGGGTCGAGCTTTCCC | (TGA)6 | 234 | FAM | 55 | Pr032824985 | Predicted: uncharacterized protein LOC100244334 [Vitis vinifera] | 5E-169 |
| R: TTCTGACCAGCCCATGTTCC | ||||||||
| AC057b | F: GTCGGCAGCTCATATCGACA | (TCC)7 | 172 | FAM | 55 | Pr032824979 | E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RING1 [Morus notabilis] | 6E-58 |
| R: GACCCAAGAGGATTTGGCCA | ||||||||
| AC058b | F: CCTTGTTGCCAGGTTTCAGC | (TCA)6 | 234 | HEX | 56 | Pr032824982 | Hypothetical protein VITISV_017318 [Vitis vinifera] | 4E-85 |
| R: TTCAGAGCGGCGGTAAGTTT | ||||||||
| AC083b | F: AAAGAGCGAGAACATGCCCA | (CAC)6 | 225 | FAM | 55 | Pr032824974 | Predicted: leucine–tRNA ligase, cytoplasmic-like [Setaria italica] | 0.0 |
| R: GCCTGGCAGTCAAGTACAGT | ||||||||
| AC088b | F: CTGAGAAGTGTTGGGGTCCC | (AGG)6 | 196 | FAM | 57 | Pr032824978 | Hypothetical protein POPTR_0005s17250g [Populus trichocarpa] | 3E-122 |
| R: TGACGGGTACTTCCAGGGAT | ||||||||
| AC090b | F: ACTCCTGAAGACGGCAAAGG | (AGA)6 | 173 | HEX | 55 | Pr032824992 | Predicted: RINT1-like protein [Prunus mume] | 0.0 |
| R: ACCGCTCGCTTCTTTCTTCA | ||||||||
| AC093a | F: GCAGCAGCAACAGATTCGAG | (AAT)6 | 204–210 | FAM | 55 | Pr032824984 | Hypothetical protein CISIN_1g0056332mg [Citrus sinensis] | 1E-144 |
| R: TGCTGTCGTAACAACGTCGA |
Note: Ta = annealing temperature.
Only observed as polymorphic in A. rigidulus and A. schoberioides.
Monomorphic microsatellite loci.
LITERATURE CITED
- Haas B. J., Papanicolaou A., Yassour M., Grabherr M., Blood P. D., Bowden J., Couger M. B. 2013. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nature Protocols 8: 1494–1512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Information Center for the Environment. 2013. Biological inventories of the world’s protected areas. Website http://www.ice.ucdavis.edu/bioinventory/bioinventory.html [accessed 15 January 2013].
- International Union for the Conservation of Nature. 2016. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016-3. Website http://www.iucnredlist.org [accessed 7 December 2016].
- Jiang X. H., Zeng G. P., Jun O. L., She C. W. 2010. An efficient system for the production of the medicinally important plant: Asparagus cochinchinensis (Lour.) Merr. African Journal of Biotechnology 9: 6207–6212. [Google Scholar]
- Lee D. Y., Choo B. K., Yoon T., Cheon M. S., Lee H. W., Lee A. Y., Kim H. K. 2009. Anti-inflammatory effects of Asparagus cochinchinensis extract in acute and chronic cutaneous inflammation. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 121: 28–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee J. H., Lim H. J., Lee C. W., Son K. H., Son J. K., Lee S. K., Kim H. P. 2015. Methyl protodioscin from the roots of Asparagus cochinchinensis attenuates airway inflammation by inhibiting cytokine production. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2015: 640846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peakall R., Smouse P. E. 2012. GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—An update. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 28: 2537–2539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rozen S., Skaletsky H. 1999. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In S. Misener and S. A. Krawetz [eds.], Methods in molecular biology, vol. 132: Bioinformatics: Methods and protocols, 365–386. Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey, USA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Samad N. B., Debnath T., Hasnat M. A., Pervin M., Kim D. H., Jo J. E., Park S. R., Lim B. O. 2013. Phenolic contents, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of Asparagus cochinchinensis (Loureiro) Merrill. Journal of Food Biochemistry 38: 83–91. [Google Scholar]
- Shasnay A. K., Darokar M. P., Sakia D., Rajkumar S., Sundaresan V., Khanuja S. P. S. 2003. Genetic diversity and species relationship in Asparagus spp. using RAPD analysis. Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plant Science 25: 698–704. [Google Scholar]
- Thiel T., Michalek W., Varshney R. K., Graner A. 2003. Exploiting EST databases for the development and characterization of gene-derived SSR-markers in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 106: 411–422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xiong D. L. X. Yu., Yan X., Guo C., Xiong Y. 2011. Effects of root and stem extracts of Asparagus cochinchinensis on biochemical indicators related to aging in the brain and liver of mice. American Journal of Chinese Medicine 39: 719–726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu S., Wang G., Mao W., Hu Q., Liu N., Ye L., Gong Y. 2014. Genetic diversity and population structure of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) landraces from China revealed by a new set of EST-SSR markers. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 57: 250–256. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang W., Jin L. H. 2016. Asparagus cochinchinensis extract alleviates metal ion-induced gut injury in Drosophila: An in silico analysis of potential active constituents. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2016: 7603746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou Q., Luo D., Ma L., Xie W., Wang Y., Wang Y., Liu Z. 2016. Development and cross-species transferability of EST-SSR markers in Siberian wildrye (Elymus sibiricus L.) using Illumina sequencing. Scientific Reports 6: 20549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]