Skip to main content
Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London logoLink to Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London
. 1994 Jul-Aug;28(4):318–321.

Does Audit Improve DNR Decision Making?

Kevin Stewart 1, Adrian Wagg 2, Mark Kinirons 3
PMCID: PMC5401050  PMID: 7965969

Abstract

The use of 'do not resuscitate' (DNR) orders in hospitals has been the subject of considerable comment in both the medical and the lay press. Guidelines have been produced to help make DNR decisions but, as yet, there have been no published accounts of these in practice. We have used audit to develop DNR policy in our hospital, and have reviewed practice after the introduction of guidelines. This led to early consultant involvement in making decisions in 55 of 80 patients (69%) who were assessed as DNR at the time of death or discharge, documentation of reasons for DNR in all 55 of these and documentation of discussion with nurses in 49 (89%). Consultants agreed with DNR decisions made by their juniors in 31 of 34 cases (91%) and changed 'for CPR' decisions to DNR in 24 of 108 (22%). We have demonstrated that audit is an appropriate way to change and develop practice in sensitive areas such as this.

Full text

PDF
318

Contributor Information

Kevin Stewart, Consultant Physician, Department of Geriatric Medicine, Newham General Hospital, London.

Adrian Wagg, Medical Registrar, Newham General Hospital, London.

Mark Kinirons, Research Fellow, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville.


Articles from Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London are provided here courtesy of Royal College of Physicians

RESOURCES