Abstract
Mosquitoes are exposed to oxidative challenges throughout their life cycle. The primary challenge comes from a blood meal. The blood digestion turns the midgut into an oxidative environment, which imposes pressure not only on mosquito fecundity and other physiological traits but also on the microbiota in the midgut. During evolution, mosquitoes have developed numerous oxidative defense mechanisms to maintain redox homeostasis in the midgut. In addition to antioxidants, SOD, catalase, and glutathione system, sufficient supply of the reducing agent, NADPH, is vital for a successful defense against oxidative stress. Increasing evidence indicates that in response to oxidative stress, cells reconfigure metabolic pathways to increase the generation of NADPH through NADP-reducing networks including the pentose phosphate pathway and others. The microbial homeostasis is critical for the functional contributions to various host phenotypes. The symbiotic microbiota is regulated largely by the Duox-ROS pathway in Drosophila. In mosquitoes, Duox-ROS pathway, heme-mediated signaling, antimicrobial peptide production and C-type lectins work in concert to maintain the dynamic microbial community in the midgut. Microbial mechanisms against oxidative stress in this context are not well understood. Emerging evidence that microbial metabolites trigger host oxidative response warrants further study on the metagenomic interplay in an oxidative environment like mosquito gut ecosystem. Besides the classical Drosophila model, hematophagous insects like mosquitoes provide an alternative model system to study redox homeostasis in a symbiotic metagenomic context.
Introduction
Hematophagy is the feeding habit of some animals that involves the ingestion of blood. Hematophagous arthropods include Diptera (mosquitoes, flies, and biting midges), Hemiptera (bed bugs and assassin bugs), Phthiraptera (sucking lice), and Siphonaptera (fleas). Most hematophagous insects possess piercing-and-sucking mouthparts and prey on much larger animals. This blood feeding behavior provides a point of pathogen transmission between host and insect. Among these hematophagous insects, vector mosquitoes are responsible for the transmission of human and animal diseases, such as Zika, Dengue fever, West Nile fever, Chikungunya, yellow fever, Eastern equine encephalitis, St. Louis encephalitis, malaria, and filariasis.
Mosquito females require a blood meal for egg production. Blood contains proteins and lipids, which are needed for oogenesis. The hemoglobin digestion releases a significant amount of heme. As a pro-oxidant, heme can induce oxidative stress by generating hydroxyl radicals through the Fenton reaction [1]. Mosquitoes also employ reactive oxygen species (ROS) to fight against various pathogens [2, 3]. For example, in a malaria-refractory mosquito strain, elevated levels of ROS are one of the factors that limit malaria parasite development [4]. As such, there is a selective pressure for adaptive strategies to mitigate the massive pulse of oxidative stress accompanied by the blood feeding and simultaneously retain the ability to combat infection through oxidative bursts [5].
The mosquito midgut harbors a dynamic microbiota. Symbiotic associations are ubiquitous in nature. Cross-kingdom interactions throughout the co-evolution have shaped the structure and functions of the microbiome; this process occurs largely in oxidative environments [6]. The shift of microbial structure after a blood meal [7] may represent an adaptive response to altered oxidative conditions in the blood-fed midgut. In the ecological niche in the midgut, both partners work in concert to maintain a redox homeostasis by launching multiple mechanisms to cope with elevated ROS levels. In this review, we summarize recent advances regarding the complex interplay of host and microbiota in maintaining redox homeostasis.
Heme signaling in transcriptional response in mosquitoes
Blood meal is the principal source of iron for egg production in mosquitoes. In a blood meal, iron is present in two forms, hemoglobin in erythrocytes and ferric-transferrin. According to Zhou et al. [8], 98% of iron in the eggs is obtained from hemoglobin, and 2% is from ferric-transferrin. However, only 7% of ingested heme iron is utilized in eggs; the remainder is discharged in excrement [8]. Heme is a pro-oxidant. The Fenton reaction using the iron from heme promotes hydroxyl radical formation, which in essence amplifies the magnitude of internal sources of ROS, and if not controlled, may lead to cell damage [9–11]. Adaptive response to the large quantity of heme in a blood meal is therefore of considerable importance to host physiology.
Heme has been shown to be a signaling molecule that is involved in the activation of steroid hormone 20-hydroxyecdysone (20E)-driven gene expression [12]. In an Aedes cell line based transcriptome interrogation, heme itself appears to signal the transcription of a wide range of genes that are involved in redox, energy metabolism and immune responses [13]. This transcriptional profile induced by heme in the cell line is similar to the transcriptional patterns induced in blood-fed mosquitoes [14], suggesting heme in vivo is one of the regulators that direct the transcriptional responses to a blood meal. Several key observations from the microarray analysis of the heme exposed cell line include: (i) heme upregulates expression of the genes encoding antioxidants such as ferritin, glutathione S-transferase X2 (GSTX2), cytochrome P450 and heat shock proteins; (ii) heme induces more transcripts than the ROS inducer paraquat (PQ) does, suggesting that heme and PQ may induce distinct signaling pathways, and heme signaling has a broader transcriptional impact; (iii) genes in several metabolic pathways are induced, including genes in glycolysis and pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), which would favor the regeneration of NADPH, an important reducing equivalent in redox reactions. These transcriptional responses to heme implicate a well-organized systemic coordination to control ROS elevation, which is consistent with the heme mediated decrease of net ROS observed in the midgut epithelial cells post blood meal [15]; (iv) heme down-regulates the transcription of immune genes, such as peptidoglycan recognition receptor protein LB, TEP20, a set of genes encoding CLIP serine proteases, and antimicrobial peptide genes defensing and cecropins, after heme supplementation in the cell line. In vivo, heme ingestion suppresses the expression of antimicrobial peptide genes cecropin D, cecropin G and attacin upon oral infection with Serratia marcescens. Heme supplementation in sugar meal also results in the increase of midgut microbiota [14]. These data indicate that heme derived from a blood meal help regulate ROS levels and local immunity that affect the midgut microbial community.
Nrf2 signaling in oxidative stress response
The nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2)-antioxidant response element (ARE) is a critical regulatory circuit for defense against oxidative stress in various organisms [16]. The Keap1/Nrf2 signaling is conserved in Drosophila [17–22], and oxidant induced Nrf2 activation regulates antioxidant and detoxification responses [23]. Relevant genes in the pathway are present in the genome of mosquitoes as well [24]. The metabolites of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), in particular, electrophilic lipid oxidation and nitration products, can induce Nrf2 activation [25]. Recently, a linoleic acid derivative, 10-Oxo-trans-11-octadecenoic acid (KetoC) generated by Lactobacillus plantarum, a bacterial resident in the human gut, has been shown to be an activator of Nrf2-ARE signaling in response to oxidative stress [26]. Interestingly, taxa in genus Lactobacillus have been identified in mosquito microbiota [7, 27]. The possibility of bacteria-derived metabolites in mosquito redox homeostasis is open to investigation.
Heme sequestration, storage, and transport
The peritrophic matrix (PM) is a semi-permeable, extracellular structure that separates the blood bolus from gut epithelial cells [28]. The PM has a large capacity for heme sequestration [29]. Heme aggregates are present within or near the PM [30]. AeIMUC1, a PM protein with chitin-binding domains and mucin-like domains, is a heme binding protein [31]. Xanthurenic acid (XA) is a metabolite in the kynurenine pathway of tryptophan degradation. XA is produced in large quantities in the midgut of Aedes aegypti after a blood meal. XA is an iron chelator that binds to heme and iron, therefore reducing the amount of free heme for use in the Fenton reaction [32]. Interestingly, certain Pseudomonas bacteria produce quinolobactin, an efficient iron scavenger derived from XA in the tryptophan-kynurenine-xanthurenic acid pathway [33, 34]. This suggests there may be a contribution of bacteria-derived heme scavengers involved in maintaining midgut redox homeostasis.
Ferritin is a primary iron storage and transport protein in mosquitoes [8, 35–37]. In Ae. aegypti ferritin transcription is induced by blood feeding, H2O2, and heme feeding [36, 38]. In Anopheles gambiae, ferritin gene is responsive to a blood meal as well [39, 40]. Iron in vertebrate host blood is present in two forms, hemoglobin and ferric-transferrin. In Ae. aegypti, ferritin is present in the midgut, fat body, ovaries, and eggs. Iron from both ferric-transferrin and heme is loaded into ferritin and is then secreted into the hemolymph [8, 35]. The ferritin likely serves a dual function, to transfer iron to eggs and to sequester excessive free iron from being used in the Fenton reaction [8]. Interestingly, in Ae. aegypti GSTX2 has an affinity for hematin [41], and this gene is transcriptionally responsive to heme [13]. GSTX2 belongs to the GST class that is associated with hematophagous insects [41], the transcriptional response to heme and affinity for hematin suggest that GSTX2 may play a protective role in coping with heme toxicity during blood digestion. Enzymatic degradation of heme is another detoxification method. In Ae. aegypti, heme oxygenase catalyzes heme degradation [42]. Apparently, multilayer protective mechanisms have evolved in mosquitoes to cope with the massive heme load from a blood meal.
Host antioxidant defense systems
Antioxidant systems are well developed during evolution. Cu, Zn and Mn superoxide dismutases (SOD) catalyze the conversion of superoxide anion into hydrogen peroxide, and catalase is responsible for detoxifying hydrogen peroxide to oxygen and water. Based on a gene expression dataset of An. gambiae [43], catalase gene is constitutively expressed at a moderate level in unfed mosquitoes and shows an early two-fold upregulation at 3 hours after blood feeding in the whole body. At 24 hours after feeding, the expression level in the whole body subsides to a level similar to that in the unfed mosquitoes, but the expression in the midgut is approximately four times higher than that in the fat body, the tissue that plays various roles in metabolism and immunity [44]. This expression pattern suggests that blood feeding triggers an early production of catalase systemically, which prepares mosquitoes for the elevation of ROS associated with the following blood digestion. Higher expression in the midgut only at 24 hours when blood digestion is at a peak indicates the local need of defense against ROS. Consistently, in Ae. aegypti, catalase is inducible by a blood meal [45] as well as a chemically defined artificial diet including hemoglobin [46]. Silencing catalase and sulfhydryl oxidase increased the mortality of An. gambiae after a blood meal [47], which highlights the role of the catalase pathway in mitigation of oxidative stress after blood feeding.
In the redox metabolism of most aerobic organisms, glutathione is an essential agent [48, 49]. Glutathione exists in both reduced (GSH) and oxidized (GSSG) states. GSH reduces H2O2 or other peroxides catalyzed by the glutathione peroxidase (GP) resulting in GSSG. GSSG can be regenerated by glutathione reductase (GR) using NADPH as a reducing agent. GR is absent in both Drosophila and mosquitoes, thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) takes the place of GR instead [50–52]. In a Walbachia infected Ae. albopictus cell line, antioxidant proteins SOD, peroxiredoxin (Prx) and GP is upregulated [53]. In An. stephensi, gene encoding 2-Cys peroxiredoxin is induced for self-protection when mosquitoes launch an oxidative and nitrosative defense against malaria parasite infection [54].
Oxidative stress-induced metabolic reconfiguration
The glutathione system and the thioredoxin system both require NADPH as reducing equivalents [49]. To maintain a functional GSH/GSSG couple buffer, it is critical to have a sufficient NADPH supply. The pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) is a major pathway to reduce NADP to NADPH. In yeast, nematodes, and humans it has been shown that upon oxidative stress induction, glucose catabolism is routed from glycolysis to the PPP [55, 56]. This metabolic reconfiguration increases the flux of NADPH generation, therefore providing sufficient reducing power for combating oxidative challenges [57, 58]. In the migratory locust, Locusta migratoria, a genome-wide transcription analysis revealed that under hypobaric hypoxia-induced oxidative stress, glycolysis was suppressed, and PPP was enhanced [59]. In a Drosophila model, a knockdown of the gene encoding ribose-5-phosphate isomerase (RPI) increases glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) activity, which results in an elevated level of both NADPH and GSH. The manipulated flies exhibit increased resistance to oxidative stress and prolonged lifespan [60]. In addition to the enzymes G6PD and 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (6PGD) in PPP, cytosolic isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) and cytosolic malic enzyme (MEN) are two other enzymatic players in a concerted metabolic network for the reduction of NADP+ to NADPH. This network coordinates metabolic responses to various environmental stress, such as oxidative stress, starvation, and desiccation [61]. In Aedes mosquitoes, metabolic genes are responsive to blood intake. The gene encoding pyruvate kinase is downregulated and genes encoding 6PGD, catalase, hexokinase, thioredoxin, and heat shock proteins are upregulated [45]. In summary, a sufficient production of reducing power is necessary to ensure a successful oxidative defense. Any disturbance in the NADP-reducing network would make an organism more susceptible to stress conditions. Further studies are needed to understand the metabolic responses to stress associated phenotypes in mosquitoes, which may reveal new molecular targets for intervention. These attributes may be used to develop novel mosquito control strategies.
Community structure in mosquito-associated microbiota
The mosquito gut ecosystem is inhabited by a complex and dynamic microbial community along the mosquito life cycle. In recent years, gut-associated microbiota has been characterized for Anopheles, Aedes and Culex mosquitoes in various habitats in different geographic regions around the world. The advances in microbiota structure, as well as their impact in different mosquito traits in physiology and immunity, have been reviewed [62–65]. Structurally, dominant taxa have been identified to belong to three phyla: Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Firmicutes. The alpha-proteobacteria are represented by genera Asaia, acetobacter in family Acetobacteriaceae; the gamma-proteobacteria are represented by genera Serratia, Enterobacter, Pantoea, etc. in family Enterobacteriaceae, genus Pseudomonas in family Pseudomonadaceae, genus Acinetobcter in family Morexellaceae and genus Aeromonas in family Aeromonadaceae; the Bacteroidetes are represented by genera Elizabethkingia and Chryseobacterium in family Flavobacteriaceae; and the Firmicutes are represented by genus Bacillus in family Bacillaceae. The genomes of several bacterial isolates derived from mosquitoes have been sequenced, including Asaia sp., Elizabethkingia anophelis, Enterobacter sp., Pseudomonas sp., Serratia sp., Stenotrophomonas maltophila, and Staphylococcus hominis [66–72]. Overall, the microbial diversity is high in mosquito-associated microbiota. At an individual level, variation can also be high [73]. The community structure is significantly influenced by the sources where mosquitoes acquire microbes in the environment, i.e., aquatic larval habitats and terrestrial habitats during adulthood [74]. In general, the gut community in larval stage is different from that in the adult stage; larval gut bacteria are largely expelled in meconium through the intestine remodeling during metamorphosis. Newly emerged mosquitoes acquire new bacteria from nectar or other natural sugar sources from plants. For example, Pseudomonas, Asaia, and Acetobacter are often associated with nectar [17, 75], and Acinetobacter and many enteric bacteria are prevalent in the plant rhizosphere and soil [76]. Nectar may become contaminated with these soil bacteria due to proximity. A significant impact on the microbial structure in the female mosquito gut occurs when a blood meal is taken. The bacterial abundance increases while diversity decreases. Bacteria in Enterobacteriaceae proliferate favorably in the blood-fed midgut, but bacteria in Sphingomonadaceae and Xanthomonadaceae are not well adapted to the altered environment and become less abundant or undetectable [7, 77]. It is an open question that how the drastic structural shift happens, which involves an interplay between the mosquito host and microbes. One of the possible drivers of this shift may be the change of nutrient provision from carbohydrate-rich diet to protein-rich diet and a corresponding alteration of metabolic architecture in the midgut. Oligotrophic bacteria may not be well fit in the nutrient enriched metabolic architecture in the blood-fed midgut. Besides, the fluctuation of oxidative states in the gut niche before and after a blood meal may play a critical role in shifting the microbial structure (see next section).
Duox mediated ROS and gut microbial homeostasis
Gut bacteria contribute significantly to the host fitness in many ways. The maintenance of microbial homeostasis is a research area that has attracted much attention recently [78, 79]. In the gut of fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, the Dual oxidase (Duox) dependent ROS generation system is essential for maintaining gut microbial homeostasis. Duox belongs to the NADPH oxidase family proteins with a function dedicated to the production of ROS. The NADPH oxidase domain of the Duox catalyzes the transfer of one electron from NADPH to O2 to form superoxide and subsequent H2O2; then the peroxidase domain converts H2O2 into hypochlorous acid (HOCl) in the presence of a chloride ion [80]. In the Drosophila model, autochthonous gut microbiota is largely monitored by Duox-ROS pathway [81–85]. IMD-AMP pathway likely acts as an immune mechanism complementary to the Duxo pathway, which remains inactive unless pathogens proliferate in the gut. The activity of the Duox system is tightly controlled at two different levels. MAPK p38/ATF2 transcription controls Duox gene expression, and the enzymatic activity of Duox is controlled by intracellular calcium concentration, which is modulated by signaling endosomes that require at least Cadherin 99C, phospholipase C-β (PLCβ) and protein kinase C (PKC) [81, 83]. Pathogen-secreted uracil has been shown to be able to fully activate the Duox-ROS system by inducing duox transcription as well as enhancing Duox enzyme activity [86]. The uracil is assumed to be recognized by a yet-unidentified receptor [83]. Usually, commensal bacteria do not release uracil, which may be an evolutionary outcome that adaptive symbionts modify the uracil secretion mechanism to avoid an induction of host ROS production [82]. Interestingly, uracil can modulate Drosophila defecation [87]. This process requires both Duox pathway and transient receptor potential (TRP) channel TRPA1. TRPA1 is a HOCl receptor and promotes defecation. Pathogen-derived uracil activates Duox system to generate ROS and HOCl, the latter triggers TRPA1 to promote defecation, resulting in the expulsion of pathogens in parallel to the microbicidal effects of ROS and HOCl [87].
The microbial composition in the Drosophila gut is simple. Commonly found bacteria are aerotolerant taxa in genera Acetobacter and Lactobacillus [88–90]. Oriental fruit fly Bactricera dorsalis harbors a more complex gut microbiota, dominated by taxa in family Enterobacteriaceae, such as Klebsiella, Enteorbacter, Pectobacterium and Serratia [91]. The diverse microbiota in the fly makes it a better model to study the role of the Duox system in microbial homeostasis. Indeed, the Duox-ROS system is functional as well in the fly [92]. The BdDuox gene is inducible upon ingestion of non-gut resident bacteria and the minor gut resident Bacillus cereus. However, the gene is not responsive to the dominant symbionts. RNAi-mediated knockdown of BdDuox led to a bacterial expansion with altered taxonomic composition in the gut microbial community. The disturbed community structure restored when the Duox RNAi effect subsided [92]. Apparently, the host gut Duox-ROS system is forbearing to the autochthonous microbial structure, but sensitive to the compositional change. Such an effective surveillance mechanism maintains the stability and resilience of the microbiota.
As mentioned above, the mosquito gut accommodates a much more diverse community [7, 27, 93, 94]. After blood feeding the microbial abundance increases and the taxonomic composition changes. Taxa in family Enterobacteriaceae are greatly enriched. The bacterial expansion is allowed due to several adaptive mechanisms. First, the proliferated bacteria are encased inside the blood bolus surrounding by the PM. Second, as shown in An. gambiae, the peroxidase/Duox system mediates protein cross-linking to form a dityrosine network (DTN) on the luminal surface of epithelial cells of the midgut. This extracellular network reduces the permeability to soluble molecules in the blood bolus. Thus, microbial immune elicitors are separated from direct contact with epithelial cells, which avoids immune activation [95]. Similarly, the DTN in ticks prevents the invasion of the pathogen Borrelia burgdorferi [96]. Third, heme mediates a reduction of ROS in the gut epithelial cells. In Aedes aegypti, a certain level of ROS is present in the epithelial cells of the sugar-fed midgut. This ROS generation is Duox dependent. Knockdown of duox resulted in the reduction of ROS levels and the increase of bacterial abundance in the sugar-fed midgut. However, in the blood-fed gut, the ROS level is significantly reduced, and heme is responsible for the ROS reduction [15]. Fourth, heme also downregulates anti-bacterial activity, as shown in a heme-treated Aedes Aag2 cell line [13], which was corroborated by a reduced abundance of immune gene transcripts [15]. Collectively, these adaptive mechanisms restrain the proliferation of bacteria in the blood bolus.
In summary, the Duox-ROS system plays multiple roles in shaping a dynamic microbiota in the mosquito gut. In the sugar-fed gut, Duox mediated ROS is critical for modulating the gut community; once a blood meal is taken, peroxidase/Duox mediated DTN acts as a physical shield to block microbial electors from interacting directly with epithelial cells, which avoids an overactivation of immune responses to the symbiotic residents. In the meantime, expanding microbes are restrained in the PM wrapped bolus, and will be excreted with digested blood waste via defecation, which involves Duox/TRPA1 as well.
Microbial capabilities to harmonize oxidative stress appear to be a critical factor in shaping symbiosis in insects. A genomic comparison of symbiotic strains of Acetobacter in Drosophila revealed a gene cluster involved in oxidative stress detoxification [97]. Some alpha-proteobacteria appear to have specific responses to heme. Louse-borne pathogenic bacteria Bartonella quintana experiences a host transition from a heme restricted niche in the bloodstream of the human host to a heme-rich niche in the gut of body louse. It is essential for Bartonella to have a survival strategy to adapt to the niche switch. Bartonella produces a family of hemin binding proteins (Hbp) that are responsive to the temperature switch from human to louse, changed hemin concentration, and oxidative stress [98–100]. It has been demonstrated that B. quintana sigma factor rpoE, a member of the sigma factor group ECF15, is involved in the adaptation to conditions in lice [98]. The ECF15 family consists of master regulators of the general stress response in alpha-proteobacteria to combat various environmental stresses, see recent reviews [101–104]. Similar studies are needed for understanding adaptation mechanisms that mosquito symbionts use to thrive in the heme-enriched blood-fed gut environment. The availability of mosquito derived bacterial strains and their genomes [66–72] enables such studies in bacterial ecology in the mosquito gut microbiome.
Mosquito C-type lectins and microbial homeostasis
C-type lectins, a family of carbohydrate binding proteins, mediate various cross-kingdom interactions in the host-microbiota interface [105–107]. In the gut of Ae. aegypti and Culex pipiens pallens, certain mosquito C-type lectins bind to bacterial glycans, which provides a protective shield to interfere with the deposition of antimicrobial peptides onto commensal bacteria [108]. It has recently been shown that O-antigen, a glycan polymer at the outermost domain of bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), is involved in the stable inhabitation of Enterobacter sp. in the midgut of Anopheles mosquitoes [109]. The O-antigen may participate in the interplay with host lectins in the gut. The interaction of microbial glycan and mosquito lectins is an understudied area; more investigations should be encouraged in this direction.
Plant derived polyphenols and microbiota
Nectar is an essential energy and nutrient source for mosquitoes. Nectar is composed of various ratios of hexoses such as glucose, fructose, and sucrose with minor constituents such as amino acids, lipids, phenolic content, and esters [110, 111]. Nectar harbors a microbial community as well [112, 113]. Mosquitoes have a preference to certain plants as their energy source. Ricinus communis is one of the plants An. gambiae prefers to take nectar from [114–116]. The extracts containing phenolics from Ricinus communis showed significant free radical scavenging activity [117]. Plant derived dietary polyphenolics are able to modulate the gut microbiota in mammals [118], and gut microbes make significant contributions to the biotransformation of dietary polyphenols to bioactive derivatives, some of which have strong antimicrobial and antiparasitic activities [119]. Resveratrol, a polyphenolic compound, has a broad range of biological activities including antioxidative capacity and ability to activate signaling molecules adenosine monophosphate-dependent protein kinase (AMPK) and sirtuins (reviewed in [120]). It has been shown that resveratrol is able to extend lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans and Dr. melanogaster by activating Sir2, a member of the sirtuin family of NAD+-dependent deacetylases, likely through a mechanism related to caloric restriction [121]. Recently, it has been shown that polyphenol-rich diets (including resveratrol) enhanced longevity of Ae. aegypti, which was mediated by activating AMPK. Besides, resveratrol feeding led to a reduced bacterial load in the mosquitoes. Consistent with this, AMPK inhibition resulted in increased bacterial proliferation. The AMPK mediated midgut autophagy was involved in the microbial modulation [122]. Interestingly, resveratrol feeding had inconsistent effects on lifespan of An. stephensi [123]. Likely, effects of polyphenols on mosquito phenotypes depend on the complex interactions of all parties in the gut environment. Since plant sugar based diets are the daily source for mosquito energy and nutrient requirements, nectar composition, nectar microbiota, and phytochemicals may play a critical role in the metagenomic homeostasis in the gut ecosystem. This direction remains to be explored in the future.
Conclusion and perspectives
In this review, we summarize recent advances in the impact of metagenomic interactions in the redox homeostasis in the mosquito gut. In the responses to the oxidative stress during blood digestion, heme plays an essential role as a signaling molecule. Heme-induced transcriptional responses coordinate systemic responses to harness oxidative stress. To ensure a sustainable redox balance, metabolic reprogramming to maintain the generation of reducing agent NADPH is behind the oxidative defense mechanisms. Increasing evidence suggests the oxidative environment is a driving force for guiding a symbiotic relationship. The host Duox-ROS system plays a vital role in maintaining a dynamic symbiotic microbiota, and the microbiome-derived metabolites contribute to the redox homeostasis as well. At the emerging stage of characterizing microbial genetic repertoire, many areas are open to exploration to gain a better understanding of metagenomic interplay in the mosquito gut ecosystem.
Highlights.
Blood digestion leads to oxidative stress in mosquitoes.
The redox homeostasis is maintained by oxidative defense mechanisms.
Mosquito Duox-ROS pathway contributes to shaping the symbiotic microbiota.
Microbial metabolites may participate in redox homeostasis.
Acknowledgments
We thank anonymous reviewers for their invaluable suggestions for improving the manuscript. The author JX was supported by the National Institutes of Health under Award Numbers SC2GM092789 and SC1AI112786. CJC was supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. 1144468. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Sadrzadeh SM, Graf E, Panter SS, Hallaway PE, Eaton JW. Hemoglobin. A biologic fenton reagent. J Biol Chem. 1984;259(23):14354–14356. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Andrews ES, Crain PR, Fu Y, Howe DK, Dobson SL. Reactive oxygen species production and Brugia pahangi survivorship in Aedes polynesiensis with artificial Wolbachia infection types. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(12):e1003075. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pan X, Zhou G, Wu J, Bian G, Lu P, Raikhel AS, Xi Z. Wolbachia induces reactive oxygen species (ROS)-dependent activation of the Toll pathway to control dengue virus in the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(1):E23–E31. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1116932108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kumar S, Christophides GK, Cantera R, Charles B, Han YS, Meister S, Dimopoulos G, Kafatos FC, Barillas-Mury C. The role of reactive oxygen species on Plasmodium melanotic encapsulation in Anopheles gambiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(24):14139–14144. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2036262100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Graca-Souza AV, Maya-Monteiro C, Paiva-Silva GO, Braz GR, Paes MC, Sorgine MH, Oliveira MF, Oliveira PL. Adaptations against heme toxicity in blood-feeding arthropods. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2006;36(4):322–335. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2006.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mone Y, Monnin D, Kremer N. The oxidative environment: a mediator of interspecies communication that drives symbiosis evolution. Proc Biol Sci. 2014;281(1785):20133112. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.3112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wang Y, Gilbreath TM, 3rd, Kukutla P, Yan G, Xu J. Dynamic gut microbiome across life history of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae in Kenya. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zhou G, Kohlhepp P, Geiser D, Frasquillo Mdel C, Vazquez-Moreno L, Winzerling JJ. Fate of blood meal iron in mosquitoes. J Insect Physiol. 2007;53(11):1169–1178. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2007.06.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jeney V, Balla J, Yachie A, Varga Z, Vercellotti GM, Eaton JW, Balla G. Pro-oxidant and cytotoxic effects of circulating heme. Blood. 2002;100(3):879–887. doi: 10.1182/blood.v100.3.879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ryter SW, Alam J, Choi AM. Heme oxygenase-1/carbon monoxide: from basic science to therapeutic applications. Physiol Rev. 2006;86(2):583–650. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00011.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Schmitt TH, Frezzatti WA, Jr, Schreier S. Hemin-induced lipid membrane disorder and increased permeability: a molecular model for the mechanism of cell lysis. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1993;307(1):96–103. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1993.1566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cruz J, Mane-Padros D, Zou Z, Raikhel AS. Distinct roles of isoforms of the heme-liganded nuclear receptor E75, an insect ortholog of the vertebrate Rev-erb, in mosquito reproduction. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2012;349(2):262–271. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2011.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bottino-Rojas V, Talyuli OA, Jupatanakul N, Sim S, Dimopoulos G, Venancio TM, Bahia AC, Sorgine MH, Oliveira PL, Paiva-Silva GO. Heme Signaling Impacts Global Gene Expression, Immunity and Dengue Virus Infectivity in Aedes aegypti. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0135985. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bonizzoni M, Dunn WA, Campbell CL, Olson KE, Dimon MT, Marinotti O, James AA. RNA-seq analyses of blood-induced changes in gene expression in the mosquito vector species Aedes aegypti. BMC Genomics. 2011;12:82. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Oliveira JH, Goncalves RL, Lara FA, Dias FA, Gandara AC, Menna-Barreto RF, Edwards MC, Laurindo FR, Silva-Neto MA, Sorgine MH, Oliveira PL. Blood meal-derived heme decreases ROS levels in the midgut of Aedes aegypti and allows proliferation of intestinal microbiota. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7(3):e1001320. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ma Q. Role of nrf2 in oxidative stress and toxicity. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2013;53:401–426. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-011112-140320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Adedara IA, Klimaczewski CV, Barbosa NB, Farombi EO, Souza DO, Rocha JB. Influence of diphenyl diselenide on chlorpyrifos-induced toxicity in Drosophila melanogaster. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2015;32:52–59. doi: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2015.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Barone MC, Sykiotis GP, Bohmann D. Genetic activation of Nrf2 signaling is sufficient to ameliorate neurodegenerative phenotypes in a Drosophila model of Parkinson's disease. Dis Model Mech. 2011;4(5):701–707. doi: 10.1242/dmm.007575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Misra JR, Lam G, Thummel CS. Constitutive activation of the Nrf2/Keap1 pathway in insecticide-resistant strains of Drosophila. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2013;43(12):1116–1124. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2013.09.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lacher SE, Lee JS, Wang X, Campbell MR, Bell DA, Slattery M. Beyond antioxidant genes in the ancient Nrf2 regulatory network. Free Radic Biol Med. 2015;88(Pt B):452–465. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.06.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pitoniak A, Bohmann D. Mechanisms and functions of Nrf2 signaling in Drosophila. Free Radic Biol Med. 2015;88(Pt B):302–313. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.06.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Deng H. Multiple roles of Nrf2-Keap1 signaling: regulation of development and xenobiotic response using distinct mechanisms. Fly (Austin) 2014;8(1):7–12. doi: 10.4161/fly.27007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sykiotis GP, Bohmann D. Keap1/Nrf2 signaling regulates oxidative stress tolerance and lifespan in Drosophila. Dev Cell. 2008;14(1):76–85. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sharakhova MV, Hammond MP, Lobo NF, Krzywinski J, Unger MF, Hillenmeyer ME, Bruggner RV, Birney E, Collins FH. Update of the Anopheles gambiae PEST genome assembly. Genome Biol. 2007;8(1):R5. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-1-r5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kansanen E, Jyrkkanen HK, Levonen AL. Activation of stress signaling pathways by electrophilic oxidized and nitrated lipids. Free Radic Biol Med. 2012;52(6):973–982. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.11.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Furumoto H, Nanthirudjanar T, Kume T, Izumi Y, Park SB, Kitamura N, Kishino S, Ogawa J, Hirata T, Sugawara T. 10-Oxo-trans-11-octadecenoic acid generated from linoleic acid by a gut lactic acid bacterium Lactobacillus plantarum is cytoprotective against oxidative stress. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2016;296:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2016.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rani A, Sharma A, Rajagopal R, Adak T, Bhatnagar RK. Bacterial diversity analysis of larvae and adult midgut microflora using culture-dependent and culture-independent methods in lab-reared and field-collected Anopheles stephensi-an Asian malarial vector. BMC Microbiol. 2009;9:96. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-9-96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shao L, Devenport M, Jacobs-Lorena M. The peritrophic matrix of hematophagous insects. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 2001;47(2):119–125. doi: 10.1002/arch.1042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pascoa V, Oliveira PL, Dansa-Petretski M, Silva JR, Alvarenga PH, Jacobs-Lorena M, Lemos FJ. Aedes aegypti peritrophic matrix and its interaction with heme during blood digestion. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2002;32(5):517–523. doi: 10.1016/s0965-1748(01)00130-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Magalhaes T. What is the association of heme aggregates with the peritrophic matrix of adult female mosquitoes? Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:362. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Devenport M, Alvarenga PH, Shao L, Fujioka H, Bianconi ML, Oliveira PL, Jacobs-Lorena M. Identification of the Aedes aegypti peritrophic matrix protein AeIMUCI as a heme-binding protein. Biochemistry. 2006;45(31):9540–9549. doi: 10.1021/bi0605991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lima VL, Dias F, Nunes RD, Pereira LO, Santos TS, Chiarini LB, Ramos TD, Silva-Mendes BJ, Perales J, Valente RH, Oliveira PL. The antioxidant role of xanthurenic acid in the Aedes aegypti midgut during digestion of a blood meal. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38349. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.du Dhardemare AM, Serratrice G, Pierre JL. Synthesis and iron-binding properties of quinolobactin, a siderophore from a pyoverdine-deficient Pseudomonas fluorescens. Biometals. 2004;17(6):691–697. doi: 10.1007/s10534-004-1205-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Matthijs S, Baysse C, Koedam N, Tehrani KA, Verheyden L, Budzikiewicz H, Schafer M, Hoorelbeke B, Meyer JM, De Greve H, Cornelis P. The Pseudomonas siderophore quinolobactin is synthesized from xanthurenic acid, an intermediate of the kynurenine pathway. Mol Microbiol. 2004;52(2):371–384. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.03999.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Dunkov BC, Georgieva T, Yoshiga T, Hall M, Law JH. Aedes aegypti ferritin heavy chain homologue: feeding of iron or blood influences message levels, lengths and subunit abundance. J Insect Sci. 2002;2:7. doi: 10.1093/jis/2.1.7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Geiser DL, Chavez CA, Flores-Munguia R, Winzerling JJ, Pham DQ. Aedes aegypti ferritin. Eur J Biochem. 2003;270(18):3667–3674. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03709.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Geiser DL, Conley ZR, Elliott JL, Mayo JJ, Winzerling JJ. Characterization of Anopheles gambiae (African Malaria Mosquito) Ferritin and the Effect of Iron on Intracellular Localization in Mosquito Cells. J Insect Sci. 2015;15 doi: 10.1093/jisesa/iev049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Saeaue L, Morales NP, Komalamisra N, Morales Vargas RE. Antioxidative systems defense against oxidative stress induced by blood meal in Aedes aegypti. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2011;42(3):542–549. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Marinotti O, Calvo E, Nguyen QK, Dissanayake S, Ribeiro JM, James AA. Genome-wide analysis of gene expression in adult Anopheles gambiae. Insect Mol Biol. 2006;15(1):1–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2006.00610.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Marinotti O, Nguyen QK, Calvo E, James AA, Ribeiro JM. Microarray analysis of genes showing variable expression following a blood meal in Anopheles gambiae. Insect Mol Biol. 2005;14(4):365–373. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2005.00567.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lumjuan N, Stevenson BJ, Prapanthadara LA, Somboon P, Brophy PM, Loftus BJ, Severson DW, Ranson H. The Aedes aegypti glutathione transferase family. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2007;37(10):1026–1035. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2007.05.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Pereira LO, Oliveira PL, Almeida IC, Paiva-Silva GO. Biglutaminyl-biliverdin IX alpha as a heme degradation product in the dengue fever insect-vector Aedes aegypti. Biochemistry. 2007;46(23):6822–6829. doi: 10.1021/bi700011d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Dissanayake SN, Marinotti O, Ribeiro JM, James AA. angaGEDUCI: Anopheles gambiae gene expression database with integrated comparative algorithms for identifying conserved DNA motifs in promoter sequences. BMC Genomics. 2006;7:116. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-7-116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Arrese EL, Soulages JL. Insect fat body: energy, metabolism, and regulation. Annu Rev Entomol. 2010;55:207–225. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-112408-085356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sanders HR, Evans AM, Ross LS, Gill SS. Blood meal induces global changes in midgut gene expression in the disease vector Aedes aegypti. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2003;33(11):1105–1122. doi: 10.1016/s0965-1748(03)00124-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Talyuli OA, Bottino-Rojas V, Taracena ML, Soares AL, Oliveira JH, Oliveira PL. The use of a chemically defined artificial diet as a tool to study Aedes aegypti physiology. J Insect Physiol. 2015;83:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2015.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Magalhaes T, Brackney DE, Beier JC, Foy BD. Silencing an Anopheles gambiae catalase and sulfhydryl oxidase increases mosquito mortality after a blood meal. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 2008;68(3):134–143. doi: 10.1002/arch.20238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Liu Y, Hyde AS, Simpson MA, Barycki JJ. Emerging regulatory paradigms in glutathione metabolism. Adv Cancer Res. 2014;122:69–101. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-420117-0.00002-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Deponte M. Glutathione catalysis and the reaction mechanisms of glutathione-dependent enzymes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1830(5):3217–3266. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2012.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Holt RA, Subramanian GM, Halpern A, Sutton GG, Charlab R, Nusskern DR, Wincker P, Clark AG, Ribeiro JM, Wides R, Salzberg SL, Loftus B, Yandell M, Majoros WH, Rusch DB, Lai Z, Kraft CL, Abril JF, Anthouard V, Arensburger P, Atkinson PW, Baden H, de Berardinis V, Baldwin D, Benes V, Biedler J, Blass C, Bolanos R, Boscus D, Barnstead M, Cai S, Center A, Chaturverdi K, Christophides GK, Chrystal MA, Clamp M, Cravchik A, Curwen V, Dana A, Delcher A, Dew I, Evans CA, Flanigan M, Grundschober-Freimoser A, Friedli L, Gu Z, Guan P, Guigo R, Hillenmeyer ME, Hladun SL, Hogan JR, Hong YS, Hoover J, Jaillon O, Ke Z, Kodira C, Kokoza E, Koutsos A, Letunic I, Levitsky A, Liang Y, Lin JJ, Lobo NF, Lopez JR, Malek JA, McIntosh TC, Meister S, Miller J, Mobarry C, Mongin E, Murphy SD, O'Brochta DA, Pfannkoch C, Qi R, Regier MA, Remington K, Shao H, Sharakhova MV, Sitter CD, Shetty J, Smith TJ, Strong R, Sun J, Thomasova D, Ton LQ, Topalis P, Tu Z, Unger MF, Walenz B, Wang A, Wang J, Wang M, Wang X, Woodford KJ, Wortman JR, Wu M, Yao A, Zdobnov EM, Zhang H, Zhao Q, Zhao S, Zhu SC, Zhimulev I, Coluzzi M, della Torre A, Roth CW, Louis C, Kalush F, Mural RJ, Myers EW, Adams MD, Smith HO, Broder S, Gardner MJ, Fraser CM, Birney E, Bork P, Brey PT, Venter JC, Weissenbach J, Kafatos FC, Collins FH, Hoffman SL. The genome sequence of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Science. 2002;298(5591):129–149. doi: 10.1126/science.1076181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kanzok SM, Fechner A, Bauer H, Ulschmid JK, Muller HM, Botella-Munoz J, Schneuwly S, Schirmer R, Becker K. Substitution of the thioredoxin system for glutathione reductase in Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 2001;291(5504):643–646. doi: 10.1126/science.291.5504.643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bauer H, Gromer S, Urbani A, Schnolzer M, Schirmer RH, Muller HM. Thioredoxin reductase from the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Eur J Biochem. 2003;270(21):4272–4281. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03812.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Brennan LJ, Keddie BA, Braig HR, Harris HL. The endosymbiont Wolbachia pipientis induces the expression of host antioxidant proteins in an Aedes albopictus cell line. PLoS One. 2008;3(5):e2083. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Peterson TM, Luckhart S. A mosquito 2-Cys peroxiredoxin protects against nitrosative and oxidative stresses associated with malaria parasite infection. Free Radic Biol Med. 2006;40(6):1067–1082. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2005.10.059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kuehne A, Emmert H, Soehle J, Winnefeld M, Fischer F, Wenck H, Gallinat S, Terstegen L, Lucius R, Hildebrand J, Zamboni N. Acute Activation of Oxidative Pentose Phosphate Pathway as First-Line Response to Oxidative Stress in Human Skin Cells. Mol Cell. 2015;59(3):359–371. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.06.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Ralser M, Wamelink MM, Kowald A, Gerisch B, Heeren G, Struys EA, Klipp E, Jakobs C, Breitenbach M, Lehrach H, Krobitsch S. Dynamic rerouting of the carbohydrate flux is key to counteracting oxidative stress. J Biol. 2007;6(4):10. doi: 10.1186/jbiol61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Dick TP, Ralser M. Metabolic Remodeling in Times of Stress: Who Shoots Faster than His Shadow? Mol Cell. 2015;59(4):519–521. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Grant CM. Metabolic reconfiguration is a regulated response to oxidative stress. J Biol. 2008;7(1):1. doi: 10.1186/jbiol63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Zhao de J, Zhang ZY, Harrison J, Kang L. Genome-wide analysis of transcriptional changes in the thoracic muscle of the migratory locust, Locusta migratoria, exposed to hypobaric hypoxia. J Insect Physiol. 2012;58(11):1424–1431. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2012.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wang CT, Chen YC, Wang YY, Huang MH, Yen TL, Li H, Liang CJ, Sang TK, Ciou SC, Yuh CH, Wang CY, Brummel TJ, Wang HD. Reduced neuronal expression of ribose-5-phosphate isomerase enhances tolerance to oxidative stress, extends lifespan, and attenuates polyglutamine toxicity in Drosophila. Aging Cell. 2012;11(1):93–103. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2011.00762.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Rzezniczak TZ, Merritt TJ. Interactions of NADP-reducing enzymes across varying environmental conditions: a model of biological complexity. G3 (Bethesda) 2012;2(12):1613–1623. doi: 10.1534/g3.112.003715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Villegas LM, Pimenta PF. Metagenomics, paratransgenesis and the Anopheles microbiome: a portrait of the geographical distribution of the anopheline microbiota based on a meta-analysis of reported taxa. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2014;109(5):672–684. doi: 10.1590/0074-0276140194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Minard G, Mavingui P, Moro CV. Diversity and function of bacterial microbiota in the mosquito holobiont. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:146. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-6-146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Dennison NJ, Jupatanakul N, Dimopoulos G. The mosquito microbiota influences vector competence for human pathogens. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2014;3:6–13. doi: 10.1016/j.cois.2014.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Jupatanakul N, Sim S, Dimopoulos G. The insect microbiome modulates vector competence for arboviruses. Viruses. 2014;6(11):4294–4313. doi: 10.3390/v6114294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Alvarez C, Kukutla P, Jiang J, Yu W, Xu J. Draft genome sequence of Pseudomonas sp. strain Ag1, isolated from the midgut of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae. J Bacteriol. 2012;194(19):5449. doi: 10.1128/JB.01173-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Kukutla P, Lindberg BG, Pei D, Rayl M, Yu W, Steritz M, Faye I, Xu J. Draft Genome Sequences of Elizabethkingia anophelis Strains R26T and Ag1 from the Midgut of the Malaria Mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Genome Announc. 2013;1(6) doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01030-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Jiang J, Alvarez C, Kukutla P, Yu W, Xu J. Draft genome sequences of Enterobacter sp. isolate Ag1 from the midgut of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae. J Bacteriol. 2012;194(19):5481. doi: 10.1128/JB.01275-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Pei D, Hill-Clemons C, Carissimo G, Yu W, Vernick KD, Xu J. Draft Genome Sequences of Two Strains of Serratia spp. from the Midgut of the Malaria Mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Genome Announc. 2015;3(2) doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00090-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Hughes GL, Raygoza Garay JA, Koundal V, Rasgon JL, Mwangi MM. Genome Sequence of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Strain SmAs1, Isolated From the Asian Malaria Mosquito Anopheles stephensi. Genome Announc. 2016;4(2) doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00086-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Hughes GL, Raygoza Garay JA, Koundal V, Rasgon JL, Mwangi MM. Genome Sequences of Staphylococcus hominis Strains ShAs1, ShAs2, and ShAs3, Isolated from the Asian Malaria Mosquito Anopheles stephensi. Genome Announc. 2016;4(2) doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00085-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Raygoza Garay JA, Hughes GL, Koundal V, Rasgon JL, Mwangi MM. Genome Sequence of Elizabethkingia anophelis Strain EaAs1, Isolated from the Asian Malaria Mosquito Anopheles stephensi. Genome Announc. 2016;4(2) doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00084-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Osei-Poku J, Mbogo CM, Palmer WJ, Jiggins FM. Deep sequencing reveals extensive variation in the gut microbiota of wild mosquitoes from Kenya. Mol Ecol. 2012;21(20):5138–5150. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05759.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Buck M, Nilsson LK, Brunius C, Dabire RK, Hopkins R, Terenius O. Bacterial associations reveal spatial population dynamics in Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes. Sci Rep. 2016;6:22806. doi: 10.1038/srep22806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Yamada Y, Yukphan P. Genera and species in acetic acid bacteria. Int J Food Microbiol. 2008;125(1):15–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.11.077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Mendes R, Garbeva P, Raaijmakers JM. The rhizosphere microbiome: significance of plant beneficial, plant pathogenic, and human pathogenic microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2013;37(5):634–663. doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Boissiere A, Tchioffo MT, Bachar D, Abate L, Marie A, Nsango SE, Shahbazkia HR, Awono-Ambene PH, Levashina EA, Christen R, Morlais I. Midgut microbiota of the malaria mosquito vector Anopheles gambiae and interactions with Plasmodium falciparum infection. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(5):e1002742. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Capo F, Charroux B, Royet J. Bacteria sensing mechanisms in Drosophila gut: Local and systemic consequences. Dev Comp Immunol. 2016;64:11–21. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2016.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Kuraishi T, Binggeli O, Opota O, Buchon N, Lemaitre B. Genetic evidence for a protective role of the peritrophic matrix against intestinal bacterial infection in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(38):15966–15971. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1105994108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Donko A, Peterfi Z, Sum A, Leto T, Geiszt M. Dual oxidases. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005;360(1464):2301–2308. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Ha EM, Lee KA, Seo YY, Kim SH, Lim JH, Oh BH, Kim J, Lee WJ. Coordination of multiple dual oxidase-regulatory pathways in responses to commensal and infectious microbes in drosophila gut. Nat Immunol. 2009;10(9):949–957. doi: 10.1038/ni.1765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Kim SH, Lee WJ. Role of DUOX in gut inflammation: lessons from Drosophila model of gut-microbiota interactions. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2014;3:116. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2013.00116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Lee KA, Kim B, You H, Lee WJ. Uracil-induced signaling pathways for DUOX-dependent gut immunity. Fly (Austin) 2015;9(3):115–120. doi: 10.1080/19336934.2015.1126011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Bae YS, Choi MK, Lee WJ. Dual oxidase in mucosal immunity and host-microbe homeostasis. Trends Immunol. 2010;31(7):278–287. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2010.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Ha EM, Oh CT, Bae YS, Lee WJ. A direct role for dual oxidase in Drosophila gut immunity. Science. 2005;310(5749):847–850. doi: 10.1126/science.1117311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Lee KA, Kim SH, Kim EK, Ha EM, You H, Kim B, Kim MJ, Kwon Y, Ryu JH, Lee WJ. Bacterial-derived uracil as a modulator of mucosal immunity and gut-microbe homeostasis in Drosophila. Cell. 2013;153(4):797–811. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Du EJ, Ahn TJ, Kwon I, Lee JH, Park JH, Park SH, Kang TM, Cho H, Kim TJ, Kim HW, Jun Y, Lee HJ, Lee YS, Kwon JY, Kang K. TrpA1 Regulates Defecation of Food-Borne Pathogens under the Control of the Duox Pathway. PLoS Genet. 2016;12(1):e1005773. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Staubach F, Baines JF, Kunzel S, Bik EM, Petrov DA. Host species and environmental effects on bacterial communities associated with Drosophila in the laboratory and in the natural environment. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e70749. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Wong CN, Ng P, Douglas AE. Low-diversity bacterial community in the gut of the fruitfly Drosophila melanogaster. Environ Microbiol. 2011;13(7):1889–1900. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02511.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Broderick NA, Lemaitre B. Gut-associated microbes of Drosophila melanogaster. Gut Microbes. 2012;3(4):307–321. doi: 10.4161/gmic.19896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Wang H, Jin L, Zhang H. Comparison of the diversity of the bacterial communities in the intestinal tract of adult Bactrocera dorsalis from three different populations. J Appl Microbiol. 2011;110(6):1390–1401. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05001.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Yao Z, Wang A, Li Y, Cai Z, Lemaitre B, Zhang H. The dual oxidase gene BdDuox regulates the intestinal bacterial community homeostasis of Bactrocera dorsalis. ISME J. 2016;10(5):1037–1050. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Terenius O, Lindh JM, Eriksson-Gonzales K, Bussiere L, Laugen AT, Bergquist H, Titanji K, Faye I. Midgut bacterial dynamics in Aedes aegypti. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2012;80(3):556–565. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01317.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Valiente Moro C, Tran FH, Raharimalala FN, Ravelonandro P, Mavingui P. Diversity of culturable bacteria including Pantoea in wild mosquito Aedes albopictus. BMC Microbiol. 2013;13:70. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-13-70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Kumar S, Molina-Cruz A, Gupta L, Rodrigues J, Barillas-Mury C. A peroxidase/dual oxidase system modulates midgut epithelial immunity in Anopheles gambiae. Science. 2010;327(5973):1644–1648. doi: 10.1126/science.1184008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Yang X, Smith AA, Williams MS, Pal U. A dityrosine network mediated by dual oxidase and peroxidase influences the persistence of Lyme disease pathogens within the vector. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(18):12813–12822. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.538272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Newell PD, Chaston JM, Wang Y, Winans NJ, Sannino DR, Wong AC, Dobson AJ, Kagle J, Douglas AE. In vivo function and comparative genomic analyses of the Drosophila gut microbiota identify candidate symbiosis factors. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:576. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Abromaitis S, Koehler JE. The Bartonella quintana extracytoplasmic function sigma factor RpoE has a role in bacterial adaptation to the arthropod vector environment. J Bacteriol. 2013;195(11):2662–2674. doi: 10.1128/JB.01972-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Battisti JM, Sappington KN, Smitherman LS, Parrow NL, Minnick MF. Environmental signals generate a differential and coordinated expression of the heme receptor gene family of Bartonella quintana. Infect Immun. 2006;74(6):3251–3261. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00245-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Liu M, Ferrandez Y, Bouhsira E, Monteil M, Franc M, Boulouis HJ, Biville F. Heme binding proteins of Bartonella henselae are required when undergoing oxidative stress during cell and flea invasion. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e48408. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Staron A, Sofia HJ, Dietrich S, Ulrich LE, Liesegang H, Mascher T. The third pillar of bacterial signal transduction: classification of the extracytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma factor protein family. Mol Microbiol. 2009;74(3):557–581. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06870.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Fiebig A, Herrou J, Willett J, Crosson S. General Stress Signaling in the Alphaproteobacteria. Annu Rev Genet. 2015;49:603–625. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-112414-054813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Francez-Charlot A, Kaczmarczyk A, Fischer HM, Vorholt JA. The general stress response in Alphaproteobacteria. Trends Microbiol. 2015;23(3):164–171. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2014.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Tu N, Lima A, Bandeali Z, Anderson B. Characterization of the general stress response in Bartonella henselae. Microb Pathog. 2016;92:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2015.12.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Dambuza IM, Brown GD. C-type lectins in immunity: recent developments. Curr Opin Immunol. 2015;32:21–27. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2014.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Giorgetti G, Brandimarte G, Fabiocchi F, Ricci S, Flamini P, Sandri G, Trotta MC, Elisei W, Penna A, Lecca PG, Picchio M, Tursi A. Interactions between Innate Immunity, Microbiota, and Probiotics. J Immunol Res. 2015;2015:501361. doi: 10.1155/2015/501361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Lightfoot YL, Selle K, Yang T, Goh YJ, Sahay B, Zadeh M, Owen JL, Colliou N, Li E, Johannssen T, Lepenies B, Klaenhammer TR, Mohamadzadeh M. SIGNR3-dependent immune regulation by Lactobacillus acidophilus surface layer protein A in colitis. EMBO J. 2015;34(7):881–895. doi: 10.15252/embj.201490296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Pang X, Xiao X, Liu Y, Zhang R, Liu J, Liu Q, Wang P, Cheng G. Mosquito C-type lectins maintain gut microbiome homeostasis. Nat Microbiol. 2016;1 doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Pei D, Jiang J, Yu W, Kukutla P, Uentillie A, Xu J. The waaL gene mutation compromised the inhabitation of Enterobacter sp. Ag1 in the mosquito gut environment. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:437. doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-1049-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Bernardello G, Galetto L, Forcone A. Floral nectar chemical composition of some species from Patagonia. II. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology. 1999;27(8):779–790. [Google Scholar]
- 111.Gonzalez-Teuber M, Heil M. Nectar chemistry is tailored for both attraction of mutualists and protection from exploiters. Plant Signal Behav. 2009;4(9):809–813. doi: 10.4161/psb.4.9.9393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Alvarez-Perez S, Herrera CM, de Vega C. Zooming-in on floral nectar: a first exploration of nectar-associated bacteria in wild plant communities. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2012;80(3):591–602. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01329.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Jacquemyn H, Lenaerts M, Tyteca D, Lievens B. Microbial diversity in the floral nectar of seven Epipactis (Orchidaceae) species. Microbiologyopen. 2013;2(4):644–658. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Gary RE, Jr, Foster WA. Anopheles gambiae feeding and survival on honeydew and extra-floral nectar of peridomestic plants. Med Vet Entomol. 2004;18(2):102–107. doi: 10.1111/j.0269-283X.2004.00483.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Kessler S, Vlimant M, Guerin PM. The sugar meal of the African malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae and how deterrent compounds interfere with it: a behavioural and neurophysiological study. J Exp Biol. 2013;216(Pt 7):1292–1306. doi: 10.1242/jeb.076588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Stone CM, Jackson BT, Foster WA. Effects of plant-community composition on the vectorial capacity and fitness of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012;87(4):727–736. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.12-0123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Iqbal J, Zaib S, Farooq U, Khan A, Bibi I, Suleman S. Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, and Free Radical Scavenging Potential of Aerial Parts of Periploca aphylla and Ricinus communis. ISRN Pharmacol. 2012;2012:563267. doi: 10.5402/2012/563267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Duenas M, Munoz-Gonzalez I, Cueva C, Jimenez-Giron A, Sanchez-Patan F, Santos-Buelga C, Moreno-Arribas MV, Bartolome B. A survey of modulation of gut microbiota by dietary polyphenols. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:850902. doi: 10.1155/2015/850902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Marin L, Miguelez EM, Villar CJ, Lombo F. Bioavailability of dietary polyphenols and gut microbiota metabolism: antimicrobial properties. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:905215. doi: 10.1155/2015/905215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Ramis MR, Esteban S, Miralles A, Tan DX, Reiter RJ. Caloric restriction, resveratrol and melatonin: Role of SIRT1 and implications for aging and related-diseases. Mech Ageing Dev. 2015;146–148:28–41. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2015.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Wood JG, Rogina B, Lavu S, Howitz K, Helfand SL, Tatar M, Sinclair D. Sirtuin activators mimic caloric restriction and delay ageing in metazoans. Nature. 2004;430(7000):686–689. doi: 10.1038/nature02789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Nunes RD, Ventura-Martins G, Moretti DM, Medeiros-Castro P, Rocha-Santos C, Daumas-Filho CR, Bittencourt-Cunha PR, Martins-Cardoso K, Cudischevitch CO, Menna-Barreto RF, Oliveira JH, Gusmao DS, Alves Lemos FJ, Alviano DS, Oliveira PL, Lowenberger C, Majerowicz D, Oliveira RM, Mesquita RD, Atella GC, Silva-Neto MA. Polyphenol-Rich Diets Exacerbate AMPK-Mediated Autophagy, Decreasing Proliferation of Mosquito Midgut Microbiota, and Extending Vector Lifespan. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(10):e0005034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Johnson AA, Riehle MA. Resveratrol Fails to Extend Life Span in the Mosquito Anopheles stephensi. Rejuvenation Res. 2015;18(5):473–478. doi: 10.1089/rej.2015.1670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]