Abstract
This study investigated the correlation between the body surface temperature (BST) and core body temperature of ewes and changes in BST during the prepartum stage in pregnant ewes. Four non-pregnant adult ewes were used in the first experiment. The BST of the upper neck, vaginal temperature (VT), and ambient temperature (AT) were measured every 10 min for seven days and analyzed for correlations. The mean (± SD) BST and VT of ewes during the study period were 35.4 ± 1.7°C and 39.1 ± 0.4°C, respectively, with a correlation of r = 0.62, P < 0.001. This finding suggested that the BST was associated with core body temperature in ewes. In the subsequent experiment, seven pregnant ewes in their third trimester were used to evaluate changes in BST measured at the upper neck 72 h before parturition. The mean BST at –24–0 h (0 h = time of parturition) was significantly lower than that at –72– –48 h and –48– –24 h (P < 0.05). The BST tended to decrease toward parturition; all BST measurements at –16– –3 h were significantly lower than those at –72 h (P < 0.05). A clear circadian rhythm in the BST was observed at two days and the day before parturition and an unclear circadian rhythm was observed on the day of parturition. Therefore, these findings indicate that the BST also decreases before parturition, as do vaginal and rectal temperatures.
Keywords: Body surface temperature, Ewe, Parturition
The occurrence of dystocia is associated with an increased mortality of newborn offspring, and it negatively affects the reproductive performance of their dams [1, 2]. The incidence of dystocia was approximately 6.8–13.7% in dairy cattle [3,4,5], 8.6% in beef cattle [6], and 9.7–16.8% in ewes [7]. Recently, there has been an increasing interest in intensive husbandry systems in cattle and sheep. However, a reduction in labor and supervision at intrapartum is likely to cause an initial increase in offspring and dam mortality [2]. Therefore, predicting the onset of parturition would facilitate the ability to supervise parturition and potentially reduce losses of both offspring and dams as a result of dystocia [8, 9].
It has long been known that body temperature drops prior to parturition in cattle [10,11,12,13,14] and ewes [15]. Several studies have provided evidence that a decrease in body temperature occurs before the onset of parturition [12,13,14]. It is suggested that this decrease in body temperature before parturition is associated with the maternal plasma progesterone concentration [12].
The monitoring of the core body temperature is used in many physiological studies, including the study of disease and reproduction. Several methods exist for measuring the core body temperature, including the use of ruminal [16], rectal [17], and vaginal [18] temperature devices. However, many of the devices used to measure the core body temperature are invasive and not always practical in a research setting.
The potential of a noninvasive technique to measure body surface temperature (BST) of dairy cattle using infrared thermography has been suggested for applications such as the study of various health disorders [19, 20] and the detection of estrus [21]. At present, however, the usefulness of infrared scanning for routine work under commercial conditions appears limited.
In this study, we also aimed to realize the utilization of cattle in the future; therefore, we evaluated the potential of BST measurements as a noninvasive measure to predict the time of parturition by examining 1) the correlation between the BST and the core body temperature of ewes, measured continuously with a temperature sensor and a data logger, and 2) prepartum change in the BST of pregnant ewes.
Materials and Methods
The animal experimentation protocol was approved by the president of Kitasato University with a judgment of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Kitasato University.
BST was measured as follows: a temperature sensor with a data logger (Kestrel DROP D1; Kestrel Meters, Sylvan Lake, MI, USA) was placed in close contact with the skin on the upper neck of each test ewe, fixed by tying it with the ewe’s fur, and covered with fur so that the sensor was not exposed to ambient air (Fig. 1). BST was recorded every 10 min. After completion of the measurement, the data were retrieved and used for analysis. Hoffmann et al. [22] showed that this method has potential as a monitoring system for BST in cattle by infrared thermography temperature collection at different body locations (i.e., the eye, back of the ear, shoulder, and vulva). However, when the temperature sensor was used to measure BST, it was necessary to attach the sensor on the outside of the ewe’s body in a place from which an ewe could not remove the sensor. Therefore, the skin on the upper neck was used in this study.
Fig. 1.
The body surface temperature sensor (A) was placed in close contact with the skin on the upper neck of the ewe (B), fixed by tying it with the ewe’s fur, and covered with fur so that the sensor was not exposed to the ambient air (C). The arrow indicates the temperature sensor’s attachment area. A small temperature sensor with a data logger for the measurement of vaginal temperature was embedded in a sponge (D, E).
Vaginal temperature (VT) was used to assess the core body temperature. A small temperature sensor with a data logger (Thermocron SL, KN Laboratories, Osaka, Japan) was embedded in a sponge, placed in the vagina of each test ewe, and set to record VT every 10 min. After the completion of the measurement, the sponge was removed from the vagina and the measurement data was retrieved in the same way as for BST.
Ambient temperature (AT) in the barn was also measured throughout the study period using a temperature sensor with a data logger (Kestrel DROP D1; Kestrel Meters). AT was recorded every 10 min and the atmospheric temperature of the height was the same as that of the ewes in the barn. The barn was naturally ventilated and lights were on from 0830 to 1730 h JST. To enable filming with light-sensitive cameras during the dark period, small lights were left on (Experiment 2). The animals did not receive direct sunlight.
Experimental design
Experiment 1: The measurement of BST and core body temperature. Four non-pregnant adult Corriedale ewes (25.2 ± 20.7 months old, 45.9 ± 1.5 kg BW) were used in this experiment in spring. The animals were housed individually in stainless steel cages 86 cm wide × 136 cm long with a raised wooden slatted floor (height: 30 cm) in the barn. The animals could lie down or stand up and move freely in the cage. This experiment was conducted over seven days. The animals were fed the necessary amount of roughage and concentrated feeds calculated on the basis of each test ewe’s body weight according to the Japanese Feeding Standard for Sheep [23]. The feed was divided into two doses: one in the morning (0830 h) and one in the late afternoon (1630 h). The animals had access to water and rock salt ad libitum. After seven days, the BST of the upper neck, VT, and AT were collected and analyzed.
Experiment 2: Prepartum changes in the BST of pregnant ewes. Seven pregnant Corriedale ewes (38.9 ± 0.3 months old, 52.0 ± 7.7 kg BW) in their third trimester were used in this experiment and housed individually in cages (86 cm wide × 136 cm long). Animals were fed according to the same protocol described above. The test ewes were continuously monitored by a web camera to accurately determine the time of parturition. BST was recorded every 10 min, starting three days before the expected date of parturition and continuing until the end of parturition, using the aforementioned procedure. At the end of the study, the measurement data were retrieved and analyzed to calculate the hourly averages of BST during the 72 h before parturition. None of the tested ewes had dystocia and all had a single birth.
Statistical analysis
Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to calculate BST, VT, and AT correlations. BST measurements several days before parturition were compared using Tukey-Kramer’s multiple comparison test. Using Dunnett’s test, prepartum hourly BST measurements were compared with measurements between 72 h and 69 h before parturition as the control. All statistical analyses were performed using JMP 8.0.1 software (JMP Version 8.01; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Differences were considered to be significant at P < 0.05.
Results
Experiment 1
The mean (± SD) AT during the study period was 16.5 ± 3.9°C (ranging from 9.0 to 26.4°C). The mean ewe’s BST and VT during the study period were 35.4 ± 1.7°C and 39.1 ± 0.4°C, respectively, with a correlation between BST and VT of r = 0.62 (P < 0.001; Fig. 2). The correlations between AT and BST and between AT and VT were r = 0.26 (P < 0.001) and r = 0.28 (P < 0.001), respectively.
Fig. 2.
The relationship between vaginal and body surface temperatures in ewes (n = 4).
Experiment 2
Table 1 shows the comparison of the mean BST measurements at –72– –48 h, –48– –24 h, and –24–0 h (0 h = time of parturition). The mean BST at –24–0 h was significantly lower than that at –48– –24 h (0.5°C) and –72– –48 h (0.7°C) (P < 0.05).
Table 1. Body surface temperature (mean ± SD) of ewes (n = 7) 72 h before lambing.
Time before lambing (h) | Body surface temperature (°C) |
–72– –48 | 35.4 ± 1.5 a |
–48– –24 | 35.2 ± 1.4 a |
–24– 0 | 34.7 ± 1.3 b |
a,b Denotes significantly different means (P < 0.05).
Figure 3 shows the change in BST measurements during the 72 h before parturition compared with the measurements at –72 h. The BST tended to decrease with measurements that were taken closer to parturition; a continuous decrease in BST was observed in –27– –3 h. In addition, measurements at –16– –3 h were significantly lower than those at –72 h (P < 0.05). The mean BST measurements at –16– –3 h was 1.1°C (ranging from –0.93 to –1.27°C) lower than those at –72 h. In contrast, the BST increased at –2–0 h.
Fig. 3.
Changes in body surface temperature (mean ± SD) in ewes (n = 7) during 72 h before parturition. Relative changes in body surface temperature when the temperature was –72 h (0 h = time of parturition) is set at 0. * indicates a significant difference compared to the value at –72 h (P < 0.05).
Figure 4 shows the difference between the BST at a particular time of the day and at the same time on the preceding day. A decrease in BST of 0.2 to 0.7°C between a particular time of day and the same time of the preceding day was observed at –33– –3 h.
Fig. 4.
The difference between the body surface temperature (mean ± SD) in ewes (n = 7) at a particular time of the day and at the same time on the preceding day.
Figure 5 shows the diurnal variation in BST between 0000 and 2300 h on day –2, day –1, and day 0 (day 0 = day of parturition). On day –2 and day –1, a clear circadian rhythm in BST was observed whereby the temperature was low in the morning and high in the late afternoon and during the night, and increased after feeding (0830, 1630 h), with a smaller magnitude of variation on day –1. On day 0, a clearly different pattern of diurnal variation than those observed during the two preceding days was observed, showing an unclear circadian rhythm.
Fig. 5.
A comparison of the diurnal rhythm of the body surface temperature in ewes (n = 7) for day –2, day –1, and day 0 (day 0 = day of parturition). The arrows indicate the time of feeding. Data for day –2, day –1 and day 0 body surface temperature are presented as the mean ± SD. SD ± 1.25, 1.29, and 1.40 for day –2, day –1, and day 0, respectively.
Discussion
Studies using Holstein cattle have shown a good correlation between vaginal and rectal temperatures [24, 25]. While it is difficult to place a short-term internal temperature-measuring device in the rectum, intravaginal placement is relatively easy. The usefulness of VT measurements has been demonstrated for continuous monitoring of the core body temperature [26, 27]. In this study, although the mean BST measured at the upper neck of ewes was lower than the mean VT by 3.7°C, a significant correlation was observed between the two parameters, suggesting that BST is associated with core body temperature. Berry et al. [28] also observed a significant positive correlation between udder surface temperature measured by infrared thermography and rectal temperature. Although BST is considered to be affected by changes in AT [29], the correlation between BST and AT was comparable to that of VT and AT in this study. This may be because the temperature sensor was closely attached to the body surface at the upper neck of ewes and covered by the ewes’ fur. This observation demonstrates the validity of the method for measuring BST at the upper neck. However, the present study was performed in mild weather conditions (AT ranged from 9.0 to 26.4°C). Hence, in severe hot or cold conditions, it is possible that the results would be different from those of this study. Thus, further studies will be needed under severe weather conditions.
The mean BST measurements at –24–0 h was significantly lower than those at –72– –48 h and –48– –24 h. Similar results were reported in previous studies that measured VT in prepartum beef cattle [14] or VT and rectal temperature in Holstein cattle [24]. In the assessment of hourly incremental changes in BST over 72 h before parturition, a continuous decrease in BST was observed at –27– –3 h. In addition, a decrease in BST of 0.2 to 0.7°C between a particular time of day and the same time of the preceding day was observed at –33– –3 h. Aoki et al. [14] continuously measured VT of prepartum beef cattle and observed a consistent decrease in VT of ≥ 0.5°C with respect to the temperature at the same time on the preceding day (29.7 h before parturition), which is consistent with our data. Pregnancy-related fluctuations in body temperature, such as increased body temperature during pregnancy [30] and a prepartum decrease in body temperature [31], have been associated with a change in the plasma concentration of progesterone secreted from the corpus luteum during pregnancy [32, 33]. The progesterone concentration decreases as the corpus luteum regresses [34]. Thus, the prepartum decrease in BST observed in this study was also likely to reflect corpus luteum regression and a subsequent decrease in progesterone concentration. In addition, the mean BST measurements at –16– –3 h were lower (1.1°C) than those at –72 h. It is possible to predict the time of parturition by detecting this decrease.
Simultaneously, a rise in BST was observed immediately before parturition. Such an elevation in body temperature immediately before parturition has been previously reported [13, 14, 25]. Although the precise cause of this phenomenon is unknown, it is likely associated with increased activity, such as frequent changes between standing and lying during the first stage of labor [35].
A circadian rhythm in body temperature, whereby temperature is low in the morning, high in the late afternoon until the night, and declines until the following morning, has been observed in cattle [30] and ewes [36]. In addition, Piccione et al. [37] confirmed that BST was lower than core body temperature, but exhibited significant daily rhythmicity in sheep. In this study, a clear circadian rhythm in the BST was observed on day –2 and day –1, although the magnitude of the diurnal variation was lesser on day –1. Moreover, a different pattern than those observed during the two preceding days was observed on day 0, showing an unclear circadian rhythm. The circadian rhythm of body temperature is affected by physiological status [38]. Lammoglia et al. [13] reported that the circadian rhythm of body temperature disappeared at 48 h before parturition in beef cattle. These observations support the results of this study.
In conclusion, this study showed that BST was continuously measured at the upper neck of ewes using a temperature sensor with a data logger was significantly correlated with VT, suggesting that BST is associated with core body temperature. We also observed a marked decrease in BST at the upper neck in the prepartum period. A number of previous studies have shown prepartum decreases in vaginal and rectal temperatures in cattle [13, 14, 25] and in ewes [15], measured using invasive techniques. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no previous reports on the prepartum decrease in BST. However, unshorn sheep have much more natural body insulation than cattle. Further studies will be needed to clarify whether the prepartum decrease in BST varies in a species-specific manner.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the member of the Laboratory of Animal Feeding and Management, Department of Animal Science, School of Veterinary Medicine, Kitasato University.
References
- 1.Tenhagen BA, Helmbold A, Heuwieser W. Effect of various degrees of dystocia in dairy cattle on calf viability, milk production, fertility and culling. J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med 2007; 54: 98–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dwyer CM, Bünger L. Factors affecting dystocia and offspring vigour in different sheep genotypes. Prev Vet Med 2012; 103: 257–264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sewalem A, Miglior F, Kistemaker GJ, Sullivan P, Van Doormaal BJ. Relationship between reproduction traits and functional longevity in canadian dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 2008; 91: 1660–1668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gevrekci Y, Akbas Y, Kizilkaya K. Comparison of different models in geneticanalysis of dystocia. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg 2011; 17: 387–392. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mee JF, Berry DP, Cromie AR. Risk factors for calving assistance and dystocia in pasture-based Holstein-Friesian heifers and cows in Ireland. Vet J 2011; 187: 189–194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Uematsu M, Sasaki Y, Kitahara G, Sameshima H, Osawa T. Risk factors for stillbirth and dystocia in Japanese Black cattle. Vet J 2013; 198: 212–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Leeds TD, Notter DR, Leymaster KA, Mousel MR, Lewis GS. Evaluation of Columbia, USMARC-Composite, Suffolk, and Texel rams as terminal sires in an extensive rangeland production system: I. Ewe productivity and crossbred lamb survival and preweaning growth. J Anim Sci 2012; 90: 2931–2940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mee JF. Prevalence and risk factors for dystocia in dairy cattle: a review. Vet J 2008; 176: 93–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shah KD, Nakao T, Kubota H. Plasma estrone sulphate (E1S) and estradiol-17β (E2β) profiles during pregnancy and their relationship with the relaxation of sacrosciatic ligament, and prediction of calving time in Holstein-Friesian cattle. Anim Reprod Sci 2006; 95: 38–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Graf GC, Petersen WE. Changes in respiration and heart rates, body temperatures, plasma lactic acid levels and plasma creatinine levels caused by stress in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 1953; 36: 1036–1048. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Porterfield ID, Olson NO. Vaginal temperature of dairy cows before and after calving. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1957; 131: 381–383. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Birgel EH, Jr, Grunert E, Soares JA. The preliminary stage of labor in cattle in relation to the clinical signs of labor and the course of progesterone secretion for the prediction of the calving time. Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr 1994; 101: 355–359 (In German). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lammoglia MA, Bellows RA, Short RE, Bellows SE, Bighorn EG, Stevenson JS, Randel RD. Body temperature and endocrine interactions before and after calving in beef cows. J Anim Sci 1997; 75: 2526–2534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Aoki M, Kimura K, Suzuki O. Predicting time of parturition from changing vaginal temperature measured by data-logging apparatus in beef cows with twin fetuses. Anim Reprod Sci 2005; 86: 1–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ewbank R. The fall in rectal temperature seen before parturition in sheep. J Reprod Fertil 1969; 19: 569–571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bewley JM, Einstein ME, Grott MW, Schutz MM. Comparison of reticular and rectal core body temperatures in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2008; 91: 4661–4672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Smith BI, Risco CA. Management of periparturient disorders in dairy cattle. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 2005; 21: 503–521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sakatani M, Takahashi M, Takenouchi N. The efficiency of vaginal temperature measurement for detection of estrus in Japanese Black cows. J Reprod Dev 2016; 62: 201–207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hurnik JF. BOER SD, Webster AB. Detection of health disorders in dairy cattle utilizing a thermal infrared scanning technique. Can J Anim Sci 1984; 64: 1071–1073. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Colak A, Polat B, Okumus Z, Kaya M, Yanmaz LE, Hayirli A. Short communication: early detection of mastitis using infrared thermography in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2008; 91: 4244–4248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hurnik JF, Webster AB, DeBoer S. An investigation of skin temperature differentials in relation to estrus in dairy cattle using a thermal infrared scanning technique. J Anim Sci 1985; 61: 1095–1102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hoffmann G, Schmidt M, Ammon C, Rose-Meierhöfer S, Burfeind O, Heuwieser W, Berg W. Monitoring the body temperature of cows and calves using video recordings from an infrared thermography camera. Vet Res Commun 2013; 37: 91–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Research Council Secretariat, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF). 2000. Japanese Feeding Standard for Sheep. Japan Livestock Industry Association, Tokyo. (In Japanese). [Google Scholar]
- 24.Vickers LA, Burfeind O, von Keyserlingk MAG, Veira DM, Weary DM, Heuwieser W. Technical note: Comparison of rectal and vaginal temperatures in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2010; 93: 5246–5251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Burfeind O, Suthar VS, Voigtsberger R, Bonk S, Heuwieser W. Validity of prepartum changes in vaginal and rectal temperature to predict calving in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2011; 94: 5053–5061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Nabenishi H, Ohta H, Nishimoto T, Morita T, Ashizawa K, Tsuzuki Y. Effect of the temperature-humidity index on body temperature and conception rate of lactating dairy cows in southwestern Japan. J Reprod Dev 2011; 57: 450–456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Burdick NC, Carroll JA, Dailey JW, Randel RD, Falkenberg SM, Schmidt TB. Development of a self-contained, indwelling vaginal temperature probe for use in cattle research. J Therm Biol 2012; 37: 339–343. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Berry RJ, Kennedy AD, Scott SL, Kyle BL, Schaefer AL. Daily variation in the udder surface temperature of dairy cows measured by infrared thermography: Potential for mastitis detection. Can J Anim Sci 2003; 83: 687–693. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Young BA. Temperature-induced changes in metabolism and body weight of cattle (Bos taurus). Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1975; 53: 947–953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kendall PE, Webster JR. Season and physiological status affects the circadian body temperature rhythm of dairy cows. Livest Sci 2009; 125: 155–160. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Burfeind O, Heuwieser W. Validity of prepartum temperature changes to predict parturition in dairy cows. Reprod Domest Anim 2011; 46(Suppl.1): 10. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kyle BL, Kennedy AD, Small JA. Measurement of vaginal temperature by radiotelemetry for the prediction of estrus in beef cows. Theriogenology 1998; 49: 1437–1449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Suthar VS, Burfeind O, Bonk S, Dhami AJ, Heuwieser W. Endogenous and exogenous progesterone influence body temperature in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2012; 95: 2381–2389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ginther OJ, Beg MA. Dynamics of circulating progesterone concentrations before and during luteolysis: a comparison between cattle and horses. Biol Reprod 2012; 86: 170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wehrend A, Hofmann E, Failing K, Bostedt H. Behaviour during the first stage of labour in cattle: Influence of parity and dystocia. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2006; 100: 164–170. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Laburn HP, Mitchell D, Goelst K. Fetal and maternal body temperatures measured by radiotelemetry in near-term sheep during thermal stress. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1992; 72: 894–900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Piccione G, Gianesella M, Morgante M, Refinetti R. Daily rhythmicity of core and surface temperatures of sheep kept under thermoneutrality or in the cold. Res Vet Sci 2013; 95: 261–265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Piccione G, Caola G, Refinetti R. Daily and estrous rhythmicity of body temperature in domestic cattle. BMC Physiol 2003; 3: 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]