Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2017 Apr 24;7:46764. doi: 10.1038/srep46764

Photon-phonon-photon transfer in optomechanics

Andrey A Rakhubovsky 1,a, Radim Filip 1
PMCID: PMC5402265  PMID: 28436461

Abstract

We consider transfer of a highly nonclassical quantum state through an optomechanical system. That is we investigate a protocol consisting of sequential upload, storage and reading out of the quantum state from a mechanical mode of an optomechanical system. We show that provided the input state is in a test-bed single-photon Fock state, the Wigner function of the recovered state can have negative values at the origin, which is a manifest of nonclassicality of the quantum state of the macroscopic mechanical mode and the overall transfer protocol itself. Moreover, we prove that the recovered state is quantum non-Gaussian for wide range of setup parameters. We verify that current electromechanical and optomechanical experiments can test this complete transfer of single photon.


Quantum optomechanics1,2 can reversibly interconnect radiation to mechanical oscillators at the level of individual quanta3,4,5,6. This connection has both fundamental and also practical consequences. At fundamental side, it controllably converts a single photon to single phonon and then, back to individual photons. It proves fundamental aspect that the information carried by the physical state of single quantum can be transferred between totally different physical systems. Also, it says message to quantum thermodynamics7, that minimal portion of energy can substantially change its form. At practical side, such the high-fidelity photon-phonon-photon transducers can be used to sense mechanical motion at levels of single phonon level. It can stimulate quantum metrology of mechanical motion8 beyond the current state of the art. Gaussian quantum entanglement9 and squeezed states10 between microwave radiation and mechanical oscillator have been experimentally generated and read out using resolved sideband regime. However, Gaussian states are not sufficient resources for advanced quantum technology. It requires non-Gaussian quantum states11 to open full space of the applications. Single photon state is basic non-Gaussian resource for optical technology, therefore the single phonon states are as well basic for non-Gaussian quantum optomechanics. A mutual interconversion between a photon and a phonon is thus an important proof of this fundamental correspondence. A single photon is simultaneously a very good test-bed to verify quantum nature of the physical interface between light and mechanics. Recently, nonclassical correlations of phonon with photon at optical frequencies have been unconditionally generated12. This opens future possibilities to exploit optomechanics operated at single phonon level. The transducers between optical, mechanical and microwave modes have been considered13,14,15,16,17 and realized in continuous-wave regime18,19,20,21. However, the continuous wave regime with steady states is not suitable when quantum processing and metrology runs in time slots. In this case, all operations are pulsed with optimized temporal shapes. Theory proposals of photon-to-phonon transfer in the pulsed22,23,24,25 and stroboscopic regime26 have been recently analyzed. Also squeezed light improved read-out of mechanical state has been separately investigated27.

In this paper, we analyze complete photon-phonon-photon coherent transfer for microwave and optical experiments in the pulsed and red side-band resolved regime. We investigate in detail possibility to transfer the negativity of Wigner function and more general quantum non-Gaussianity through an optomechanical system in contrast to studies of engineering of a nonclassical state of a mechanical mode28,29. Transfer of both negativity and non-Gaussianity is much more demanding than the transfer of Gaussian entanglement. We verify that the electromechanical platforms9,30 with microwave radiation are already feasible for such transduction preserving negativity of Wigner function. The optomechanical experiments require coupling higher than critical to reach this possibility. To preserve quantum non-Gaussianity of single photon, optical experiment12 is however already sufficient. Our analysis can be extended to other systems31. We numerically verify all the predictions using analysis beyond adiabatic elimination of intracavity field. We use single photon as a basic test bed for photon-phonon-photon channel, however, it verifies basic quality of coherent transfer for other non-Gaussian states. Our results therefore open path to use photon-phonon-photon transducer for many future experiments in quantum metrology, quantum nonlinear optomechanics and quantum thermodynamics.

Summary of the main results

It has been shown previously32 that in presence of a strong red-detuned coherent pulse, the quantum states of the mechanical mode of an optomechanical cavity and the resonant with the cavity pulse can in principle be swapped. That is, the quantum state of an incident pulse is transferred to the mechanical mode and the state of the latter is mapped to the reflected light. The scheme analyzed here uses this state swap twice: first time to upload a highly nonclassical (single-photon) quantum state to the mechanical mode and second time to read the evolved state out (see Fig. 1). We were inspired by the quality of state read out in experiment9.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) A coherent pulse with amplitude Inline graphic in the resonantly red-detuned pulse enhances the optomechanical coupling and allows to swap the thermal state of mechanical mode Inline graphic with the single-photon state Inline graphic of the resonant pulse converting the latter to a phonon in the optomechanical system (b). A consequent readout pulse with amplitude Inline graphic performs a reverse swap to convert the evolved phonon to a photon Inline graphic in a mode with exponentially decaying envelope. Examples of experimental systems include (c), electromechanical system9, (d), optomechanical crystal38.

First, the pulse in single-photon state in the optical mode described by annihilation operator Ain is shone upon the cavity at its resonance frequency Inline graphic. A strong classical coherent pulse with amplitude α1 at frequency Inline graphic enables the state swap, so that the mechanical state after the pulse reads27,32

graphic file with name srep46764-m3.jpg

where Inline graphic is the transmittivity associated with the partial state swap. Here κ is the cavity decay rate and g0 is the single-photon optomechanical coupling strength enhanced by the mean intracavity photon number Inline graphic. If the interaction time τ1 or optomechanical coupling Inline graphic is sufficient, the optical state is perfectly mapped to the mechanical mode. In practice, high optomechanical coupling may be inaccessible, or cause unwanted heating due to absorption in mirrors. The temporal duration τ1 of the pulse is as well limited by mechanical decoherence.

After the upload, the mechanical state is left to evolve for time τs. During this time the mechanical environment admixes thermal noise to the quantum state of the mechanical mode. This effect can be described by an effective transmittance Inline graphic, where γ is the mechanical damping rate. This admixture happens as well during the upload stage (and consequent readout), but we omit it for the state swap stages as this effect can be reduced by shortening the pulses durations.

Finally, another state swap is performed to read the mechanical state out. In a full analogy with Eq. (1) the state of the output optical mode reads

graphic file with name srep46764-m8.jpg

where Inline graphic describes a vacuum mode incident to the cavity, Inline graphic, Inline graphic and Inline graphic is the temporal duration of the readout pulse.

The complete channel from the input optical state with annihilation operator Ain to the output one with Aout will be degraded by optical losses caused by e.g. imperfect coupling to the optomechanical cavity. The optical loss performs admixture of vacuum to the signal mode and is characterized by transmittivity Inline graphic, where κ and κe are respectively total cavity decay rate and the cavity decay rate due to the coupling to the waveguide.

All the steps constituting the channel thus can be described by known transmittivities and therefore the quadratures of the output optical state can be expressed in terms of quadratures Qin of input state and quadratures of added noise QN

graphic file with name srep46764-m14.jpg
graphic file with name srep46764-m15.jpg

Here the transmittivity equals Inline graphic.

The noisy mode QN in the equation above comprises optical noises coming from imperfect coupling, thermal mechanical noise and the initial mechanical state. We assume all these modes to be zero-mean Gaussian noises with known variances. From the latter we construct the covariance matrix of QN which is a diagonal 2 × 2 matrix with the diagonal elements equal

graphic file with name srep46764-m17.jpg

Here we assumed that the mechanical mode and its environment are initially in thermal states with occupation Inline graphic and Inline graphic respectively and all the auxiliary optical modes are in vacuum.

In order to transfer negativity of the Wigner function of a single-photon state, the variance Eq. (5) should satisfy Inline graphic Our goal is thus to increase the transmittivity Inline graphic preserving moderate added noise variance Inline graphic. From the expression for Inline graphic it is evident that it can be increased by increasing either of Inline graphic and Inline graphic. However, increasing Inline graphic not only increases Inline graphic but decreases Inline graphic by diminishing the ratio of the initial thermal mechanical state in the output. Increase of Inline graphic is not so crucially important and it causes increase of both Inline graphic and Inline graphic. These simple considerations can be proven by calculating partial derivatives

graphic file with name srep46764-m32.jpg
graphic file with name srep46764-m33.jpg

The principal dependence of Inline graphic on Inline graphic is shown for different transmittances Inline graphic in Fig. 2(a). The mechanical mode is considered to be at equilibrium with the environment at Inline graphic. Even this low occupation creates a demand for a very efficient state upload, so that increasing Inline graphic with constant Inline graphic helps to suppress the added noise dramatically (dashed lines). It is worth noting that for certain values of Inline graphic the successful transfer of the negativity is impossible regardless of Inline graphic. Note, it is evident that is much easier to reach entanglement preserving channel than to transfer negative Wigner function. From the Fig. 2(b) that shows the analysis following the full solution (see Methods) we conclude that the current electromechanical setups9,30 are capable of the transfer of the negativity of the Wigner function provided there is a single-photon Fock state at input. The correspondence between Fig. 2(a) and (b) allows us to conclude that the simple model based on the effective transmittances provides qualitatively correct understanding of the physics of the transfer.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Added noise variance Inline graphic (in shot noise units) as a function of the optomechanical channel transmittivity Inline graphic for (a): the adiabatic regime (Equation (5)) and for (b) full solution (see Methods). Along solid [dashed] lines Inline graphic [Inline graphic] is constant, along the dotted line Inline graphic. Values in brackets show pairs Inline graphic at the corresponding points. Gray dashed lines show threshold variances that allow respectively transfer of negativity of a Wigner function (Inline graphic) and preservation of entanglement (Inline graphic)37. Vertical dashed lines in (b) show the maximum possible transmittance allowed by coupling efficiency Inline graphic. To justify validity of the Rotating Wave Approximation (RWA) used throughout the paper, we plot with solid cyan lines the solution obtained without using the RWA for one of the sets of parameters.

A major impediment to the successful photon-phonon-photon transfer preserving the negativity of Wigner function is the initial occupation of the mechanical mode. The influence of the mechanical bath during the state swap stages can in principle be suppressed by taking shorter pulses, however, the nonzero initial occupation has to be compensated for either by precooling of the mechanical mode or by a very efficient upload. In spite of our considered experimental scheme the precooling happens to be an additional resource that can relax the requirements to the upload of the quantum state stage. The considerations without the additional precooling therefore happen to be more conservative as such regime is more challenging experimentally and it requires the upload efficiencies close to unity. These efficiencies, however, are realistic at least in the domain of state-of-the-art electromechanics9, where the transmittances can reach level as high as Inline graphic. There is therefore an open way to experimentally test photon-phonon-photon channel preserving negativity of Wigner function.

We should note that in order to transmit negativity of the Wigner function, one should have Inline graphic which places restrictions on each of individual transmittances, particularly on the efficiency of the coupling, Inline graphic. That is, critically coupled systems with Inline graphic are incapable of transferring the negativity regardless of the effectiveness of state upload and readout. For these systems we consider another measure of nonclassicality, namely the quantum non-Gaussianity. A convenient criterion33,34 allows to determine whether a state can not be represented as a mixture of Gaussian states. The criterion establishes an upper boundary Inline graphic for the probability of the single photon state Inline graphic for a fixed probability of vacuum Inline graphic. That is if for a certain quantum state the condition Inline graphic is fulfilled, then this state is definitely non-Gaussian. This boundary can be parametrized as follows:

graphic file with name srep46764-m50.jpg

with r ∈ (0, +∞). To evaluate the non-Gaussian properties of the restored state of the field we therefore need to evaluate the probabilities Inline graphic and Inline graphic corresponding to this state and certify if they belong to the region accessible to Gaussian states. The latter is denoted as Inline graphic and shaded at Fig. 3. Experimentally both probabilities can be determined from homodyne detection scheme used to verify negativity of Wigner function33. Alternatively, single photon counters can be used35.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The probability of a multiphoton contribution Inline graphic versus the probability of a single-photon state Inline graphic in the read out state of electromechanical systems (a) and optomechanical system (b). The plots in (a) are made for parameters of electromechanical experiments9 (green lines) and ref. 30 (blue lines). The plots in (b) are made for the critically coupled Inline graphic (yellow line) and undercoupled Inline graphic (purple line) optomechanical cavity12. In brackets are pairs of transmittances Inline graphic that mark the corresponding line entering non-Gaussianity area.

In order to evaluate Inline graphic and Inline graphic, we use our estimates for the transmittance Inline graphic and added noise Inline graphic to calculate the Wigner function of the recovered state, from which we find the needed probabilities. Results of this calculation are visualized for recent electro- and optomechanical experiments at Fig. 3. Example Wigner functions are demonstrated in Fig. 4. The demonstration of quantum non-Gaussianity transferred by a photon-phonon-photon channel is feasible with both platforms. The required efficiencies, particularly ones of the readout, are significantly lower for the electromechanics than that needed for the transfer of negativity of Wigner function. Note that for the weakly coupled optomechanical system, the transfer of negativity is impossible regardless of the efficiencies of the state swap. Due to the initial occupation of the mechanical modes a very efficient state upload is required.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Wigner functions of the restored state for the points before (A) and after (B) crossing the threshold Inline graphic (Fig. 2), and outside (C) and inside (D) the non-Gaussianity area Inline graphic (Fig. 3). All plots are made for the parameters of the experiment reported in ref. 30.

Methods

For a rigorous analysis that accounts for the imperfections properly, we start with the linearised Heisenberg-Langevin equations for the optomechanical system with a strong resonantly red-detuned pump. In terms of annihilation operators Inline graphic and Inline graphic of optical and mechanical modes respectively the equations read27:

graphic file with name srep46764-m60.jpg
graphic file with name srep46764-m61.jpg

Here Inline graphic is the mechanical mode frequency, Inline graphic is mechanical viscous damping coefficient, Inline graphic and Inline graphic are the input and auxiliary vacuum optical modes respectively, and Inline graphic describes the Markovian noises from the mechanical environment. The coupling equals Inline graphic for Inline graphic-th pulse and Inline graphic during the storage between the pulses. Usually the condition of resolved sideband Inline graphic holds and therefore the rotating wave approximation (RWA) can be applied thus eliminating the rapid terms proportional to Inline graphic in the equations above. To prove validity of our results obtained with help of RWA, on Fig. 2 we present a solution that takes into account the rapid terms by the perturbation method. The fact that this complete solution coincides with the solution taking advantage of RWA justifies use of the latter for the rest of the paper.

With help of the input-output relation

graphic file with name srep46764-m72.jpg

we are able to construct the relation connecting the bosonic operator of the input optical mode Inline graphic with the output Inline graphic in analogy with Eq. (3).

The bosonic operators are defined as

graphic file with name srep46764-m75.jpg

The pulse shapes Inline graphic and Inline graphic are determined from the Eqs (9) and (10). Generally expressions for these functions are quite complicated hence we do not write those explicitly here. In the limit of high Inline graphic, where the cavity mode can be approximately eliminated32,

graphic file with name srep46764-m79.jpg
graphic file with name srep46764-m80.jpg

Knowing the statistics of each individual constituent of the noisy mode Inline graphic, we can evaluate the variance of the added noise: Inline graphic e.g., following the steps outlined in ref. 36, Appendix B. It is visualized as a function of the transmittivity Inline graphic in Fig. 2(b).

The negativity- and entanglement-preserving thresholds Inline graphic and Inline graphic can be easily derived as follows. The value of Inline graphic is naturally obtained from the value of the Wigner function in the origin of the single-photon that passed the beamsplitter. The Inline graphic is derived from taking the maximum over the two-mode squeezed vacuum in a thermal channel. These boundaries are derived carefully in ref. 37.

The effective transmittivities Inline graphic and Inline graphic associated with respectively upload and readout stages present a convenient way to parametrize this dependence. Each of these transmittivities can be increased via increase of either corresponding pump power (intracavity photon number) or pulse duration. The latter way is accompanied by increase of the mechanical environment impact. In the Fig. 2(b) we assume the coupling close to the highest reported and change Inline graphic to produce change of Inline graphic. We use the following dimensionless parameters to produce the plots: for the green lines (as reported in ref. 9): Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic. For the blue lines (following30) Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic.

Evaluation of the transfer of quantum nongaussianity requires computation of the probability of vacuum and of single photon. If the restored optical quantum state is Inline graphic, these probabilities equal Inline graphic and Inline graphic and can be determined by homodyne tomography33. The quantum state Inline graphic is found as a result of a single photon |1〉 passing a virtual beamsplitter with transmittance Inline graphic that adds noise with variance Inline graphic. The curves in Fig. 3a are produced for same numerical parameters as Fig. 2(b). To produce Fig. 3(b) we use parameters reported in ref. 12, Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic and Inline graphic respectively for yellow and purple lines.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Rakhubovsky, A. A. and Filip, R. Photon-phonon-photon transfer in optomechanics. Sci. Rep. 7, 46764; doi: 10.1038/srep46764 (2017).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge financial support from Grant No. GB14-36681G of the Czech Science Foundation. A.R. acknowledges institutional support of the Faculty of Science, Palacký University.

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Author Contributions Both A.R. and R.F. contributed jointly to theory. R.F. proposed the theoretical concept. A.R. carried out the detailed calculations. Both authors contributed to the interpretation of the work and the writing of the manuscript.

References

  1. Aspelmeyer M., Kippenberg T. J. & Marquardt F. Cavity optomechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics 86, 1391–1452, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.86.1391 (2014). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Khalili F. Y. & Danilishin S. L. Quantum Optomechanics. In Visser T. D. (ed.) Progress in Optics, vol. 61, 113–236 (Elsevier, 2016). [Google Scholar]
  3. Thompson J. D. et al. Strong dispersive coupling of a high-finesse cavity to a micromechanical membrane. Nature 452, 72–75, doi: 10.1038/nature06715 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gröblacher S., Hammerer K., Vanner M. R. & Aspelmeyer M. Observation of strong coupling between a micromechanical resonator and an optical cavity field. Nature 460, 724–727, doi: 10.1038/nature08171 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Verhagen E., Deléglise S., Weis S., Schliesser A. & Kippenberg T. J. Quantum-coherent coupling of a mechanical oscillator to an optical cavity mode. Nature 482, 63–67, doi: 10.1038/nature10787 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cohen J. D. et al. Phonon counting and intensity interferometry of a nanomechanical resonator. Nature 520, 522–525, doi: 10.1038/nature14349. ArXiv: 1410.1047 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Vinjanampathy S. & Anders J. Quantum Thermodynamics. Contemporary Physics 57, 545–579 ArXiv: 1508.06099 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  8. Schnabel R. Squeezed states of light and their applications in laser interferometers. arXiv:1611.03986 [quant-ph] ArXiv: 1611.03986 ( 2016. ). [Google Scholar]
  9. Palomaki T. A., Teufel J. D., Simmonds R. W. & Lehnert K. W. Entangling Mechanical Motion with Microwave Fields. Science 342, 710–713, doi: 10.1126/science.1244563 (2013) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pirkkalainen J.-M., Damskägg E., Brandt M., Massel F. & Sillanpää M. A. Squeezing of Quantum Noise of Motion in a Micromechanical Resonator. Physical Review Letters 115, 243601, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.243601. ArXiv: 1507.04209 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mari A. & Eisert J. Positive Wigner Functions Render Classical Simulation of Quantum Computation Efficient. Physical Review Letters 109, 230503, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.230503. ArXiv: 1208.3660 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Riedinger R. et al. Non-classical correlations between single photons and phonons from a mechanical oscillator. Nature 530, 313–316, doi: 10.1038/nature16536. ArXiv: 1512.05360 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Safavi-Naeini A. H. & Painter O. Proposal for an optomechanical traveling wave phonon–photon translator. New Journal of Physics 13, 013017 ArXiv: 1009.3529 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang Y.-D. & Clerk A. A. Using Interference for High Fidelity Quantum State Transfer in Optomechanics. Physical Review Letters 108, 153603, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.153603. ArXiv: 1110.5074 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tian L. Adiabatic State Conversion and Pulse Transmission in Optomechanical Systems. Physical Review Letters 108, 153604, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.153604 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Tian L. Optoelectromechanical transducer: reversible conversion between microwave and optical photons. Annalen der Physik 527, 1–14, doi: 10.1002/andp.201400116. ArXiv: 1407.3035 (2015). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhang H., Song X.-K., Ai Q., Zhang M. & Deng F.-G. Transitionless intra-cavity quantum state transfer in optomechanical systems. arXiv:1610.09938 [quant-ph] ArXiv: 1610.09938 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  18. Hill J. T., Safavi-Naeini A. H., Chan J. & Painter O. Coherent optical wavelength conversion via cavity optomechanics. Nature Communications 3, 1196, doi: 10.1038/ncomms2201. ArXiv: 1206.0704 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Andrews R. W. et al. Bidirectional and efficient conversion between microwave and optical light. Nature Physics 10, 321–326, doi: 10.1038/nphys2911. ArXiv: 1310.5276 (2014). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Andrews R. W., Reed A. P., Cicak K., Teufel J. D. & Lehnert K. W. Quantum-enabled temporal and spectral mode conversion of microwave signals. Nature Communications 6, 10021, doi: 10.1038/ncomms10021. ArXiv: 1506.02296 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lecocq F., Clark J., Simmonds R., Aumentado J. & Teufel J. Mechanically Mediated Microwave Frequency Conversion in the Quantum Regime. Physical Review Letters 116, 043601, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.043601. ArXiv: 1512.00078 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Khalili F. et al. Preparing a Mechanical Oscillator in Non-Gaussian Quantum States. Physical Review Letters 105, 070403, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.070403 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. McGee S. A., Meiser D., Regal C. A., Lehnert K. W. & Holland M. J. Mechanical resonators for storage and transfer of electrical and optical quantum states. Physical Review A 87, 053818, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.87.053818. ArXiv: 1305.6962 (2013). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rakhubovsky A. A., Vostrosablin N. & Filip R. Squeezer-based pulsed optomechanical interface. Physical Review A 93, 033813, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.033813. ArXiv: 1511.08611 (2016). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Bennett J. S. et al. A quantum optomechanical interface beyond the resolved sideband limit. New Journal of Physics 18, 053030 ArXiv: 1510.05368 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  26. Hoff U. B., Kollath-Bönig J., Neergaard-Nielsen J. S. & Andersen U. L. Measurement-Induced Macroscopic Superposition States in Cavity Optomechanics. Physical Review Letters 117, 143601, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.143601. ArXiv: 1601.01663 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Filip R. & Rakhubovsky A. A. Transfer of non-Gaussian quantum states of mechanical oscillator to light. Physical Review A 92, 053804, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.92.053804 (2015). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rogers B., Gullo N. L., De Chiara G., Palma G. M. & Paternostro M. Hybrid optomechanics for Quantum Technologies. Quantum Measurements and Quantum Metrology 2, 11–43, doi: 10.2478/qmetro-2014-0002. ArXiv: 1402.1195 (2014). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Teklu B., Ferraro A., Paternostro M. & Paris M. G. A. Nonlinearity and nonclassicality in a nanomechanical resonator. EPJ Quantum Technology 2, 16, doi: 10.1140/epjqt/s40507-015-0029-x. ArXiv: 1501.03767 (2015). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ockeloen-Korppi C. F. et al. Low-noise amplification and frequency conversion with a multiport microwave optomechanical device. arXiv:1602.05779 [cond-mat, physics:quant-ph]. ArXiv: 1602.05779 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  31. Xia K., Vanner M. R. & Twamley J. An opto-magneto-mechanical quantum interface between distant superconducting qubits. Scientific Reports 4, 5571, doi: 10.1038/srep05571 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hofer S. G., Wieczorek W., Aspelmeyer M. & Hammerer K. Quantum entanglement and teleportation in pulsed cavity optomechanics. Physical Review A 84, 052327, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.052327 (2011). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Filip R. & Mišta L. Detecting Quantum States with a Positive Wigner Function beyond Mixtures of Gaussian States. Physical Review Letters 106, 200401, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.200401 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ježek M. et al. Experimental test of the strongly nonclassical character of a noisy squeezed single-photon state. Physical Review A 86, 043813, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.043813. ArXiv: 1206.7057 (2012). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Straka I. et al. Quantum non-Gaussian Depth of Single-Photon States. Physical Review Letters 113, 223603, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.223603. ArXiv: 1403.4194 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Vostrosablin N., Rakhubovsky A. A. & Filip R. Pulsed quantum interaction between two distant mechanical oscillators. Physical Review A 94, 063801, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.94.063801. ArXiv: 1605.05932 (2016). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Serafini A., Paris M. G. A., Illuminati F. & Siena S. D. Quantifying decoherence in continuous variable systems. Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics 7, R19–R36, doi: 10.1088/1464-4266/7/4/R01. Arxiv:quant-ph/0501173 (2005). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Chan J. et al. Laser cooling of a nanomechanical oscillator into its quantum ground state. Nature 478, 89–92, doi: 10.1038/nature10461. ArXiv:1106.3614 [quant-ph] (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES