Abstract
MicroRNA (miRNA) are endogenous non-coding RNAs that suppress gene expression at the transcriptional, post-transcriptional or translational level by targeting the 3′-UTRs of specific mRNAs. miR-10a has been frequently reported to be aberrantly overexpressed in human tumors. In gastric cancer (GC), miR-10a has an important role in the metastasis from primary GC to lymph nodes. However, the role and relevant pathways of miR-10a in GC metastasis remain largely unknown. The present study was performed using 41 GC and 20 normal gastric mucosa tissues. Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis demonstrated that MAPK8IP1 was significant downregulated in GC tissue. A statistically significant inverse correlation was detected between miR-10a and MAPK8IP1 mRNA expression levels in GC specimens. Luciferase reporter assay and qPCR results suggested that MAPK8IP1 was a direct target of miR-10a in GC cells. Matrigel invasion assay and wound-healing assay results showed that MAPK8IP1 overexpression rescued the increased migration ability of miR-10a effectors in MKN45 cells. Furthermore, the underlying mechanism of miR-10a functions in GC was explored. The findings indicated that miR-10a-5p directly targets MAPK8IP1, as a major mechanism for gastric cancer metastasis. The results of the present study suggested that miR-10a may be a potential target for the treatment of GC in the future.
Keywords: mitogen-activated protein kinase 8IP1, miR-10a-5p, gastric cancer, metastasis, mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling
Introduction
Gastric cancer (GC) ranks as the second leading cause of cancer-associated mortality worldwide, accounting for ~1,000,000 deaths worldwide per year and ~10% of newly diagnosed cancer incidence (1). Common features of GC include invasive progression and a high frequency of metastasis to lymph nodes (2–4). The malignant potential of cancer is manifested in the ability of tumor cells to form metastases in distant organs (5). Various steps in the complex metastatic process are associated with the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways, which are activated by mitogens and have been found to be upregulated in human GC (6,7). MAPK8IP1 is able to interact with dual leucine zipper-bearing kinase/mixed-lineage kinases, MKK7 and c-Jun N-terminal kinases MAPKs, act as a negative regulator of MAPK activity (8,9).
Data from several studies have shown that various genetic alterations induce tumorigenesis and the progression of GC (10). MicroRNA (miRNA) are endogenous non-coding RNAs that suppress gene expression at the transcriptional, post-transcriptional or translational level by targeting the 3′-UTRs of specific mRNAs (11,12). Aberrant miRNA expression has frequently been reported in various tumors, including lung cancer (13,14), breast cancer (15), colon cancer (16) and leukemia (17), indicating that they have emerged as important regulators of human malignancy.
miR-10a has been reported to be aberrantly overexpressed in human tumors (18,19). For example, miR-10a is overexpressed in human pancreatic cancer and is associated with its invasiveness, which occurs, in part, via the suppression of the HOXA1 gene (20). Retinoic acid receptor antagonists inhibit miR-10a expression and block metastatic behavior of pancreatic cancer (21). Moreover, therapeutic silencing of miR-10b has been shown to inhibit metastasis in a mouse mammary tumor model (22). In GC, miR-10a has an important role in metastasis from primary GC to the lymph nodes (23). However, the role and relevant pathways of miR-10a in GC metastasis remain unknown.
The present study was performed using 41 GC and 20 normal gastric mucosa tissues. Reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis was used to assess the expression levels of MAPK8IP1 in GC tissue, the results revealed significantly downregulated MAPK8IP1 in GC tissue. Furthermore, a statistically significant inverse correlation was observed between miR-10a and MAPK8IP1 mRNA expression levels in GC specimens. Luciferase reporter assay and qPCR results suggested that MAPK8IP1 was a direct target of miR-10a in GC cells. Matrigel invasion assay and wound-healing assay findings showed that MAPK8IP1 overexpression rescued the increased migration ability of miR-10a effectors in MKN45 cells. Finally, the underlying mechanism of miR-10a functions in GC were explored.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
For the use of these clinical materials for research purposes, prior written informed consent was obtained from all of the patients and ethical approval was granted by the Ethics Committees of Gaozhou People's Hospital (Gaozhou, China).
Cell culture and tissue collection
MKN45 and HNE-1 human GC cell lines (Cancer Research Institute, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China) were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (both from Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator. In total, 41 GC specimens and 20 non-cancerous control normal gastric mucosa tissues were obtained at the time of diagnosis before any therapy was administered at Gaozhou People's Hospital. In 41 cases, there were 33 males and 8 females with ages ranging from 38 to 78 years (mean age, 56.7 years). All specimens had a confirmed pathological diagnosis and were staged according to the 2009 UICC-TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors (24).
RNA extraction and RT-qPCR
Total RNA was extracted from MKN45 cells with TRIzol reagent (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). DNase (1 U/µg RNA) was applied with thermal denaturation at 75°C for 5 min to remove genomic DNA. RNA (3 µg) was reverse transcribed into cDNA using a High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The RT mixture contained 2X RT Master Mix in a final volume of 10 µl, including 2.0 µl 10X RT Buffer, 0.8 µl 25X dNTP Mix (100 mM), 2.0 µl 10X RT Random Primers, 1.0 µl MultiScribe™ Reverse Transcriptase, 1.0 µl RNase inhibitor and 3.2 µl nuclease-free H2O. Total RNA was added to the 2X RT Master Mix to create a 1X mix, and RT was performed in a thermal cycler (25°C for 10 min, 37°C for 120 min, and 85°C for 5 min). RT-qPCR analysis of mRNAs of MAPK8IP1, β-catenin, Snail, fibronectin, vimentin, phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), Akt, N-cadherin, E-cadherin and GAPDH (internal standard) were performed on a StepOne™ Real-time PCR system using Power SYBR® Green PCR Master mix (both Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) in a final volume of 20 µl, comprising 100 ng cDNA, 10 µl master mix, 1 µl ROX and 0.4 pmol/µl of each primer. Thermal cycling conditions included an initial denaturation for 1 min at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles consisting of an annealing step at 95°C for 5 sec and an extension step at 60°C for 20 sec. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate. The primer sequences used for PCR are shown in Table I. The relative expression levels of the genes were calculated according to the 2−ΔΔCq method. Results were analyzed using Applied Biosystems 7500 system software v1.4.0.
Table I.
Gene | Forward primer (5′-3′) | Reverse primer (5′-3′) |
---|---|---|
MAPK8IP1 | ATCGCTTCGCCTCCCAATTT | ATCTCCGAGAGGTCTTCATCC |
β-catenin | AAAGCGGCTGTTAGTCACTGG | CGAGTCATTGCATACTGTCCAT |
Snail | TCGGAAGCCTAACTACAGCGA | AGATGAGCATTGGCAGCGAG |
Fibronectin | CGGTGGCTGTCAGTCAAAG | AAACCTCGGCTTCCTCCATAA |
Vimentin | GACGCCATCAACACCGAGTT | CTTTGTCGTTGGTTAGCTGGT |
PTEN | TGGATTCGACTTAGACTTGACCT | GGTGGGTTATGGTCTTCAAAAGG |
Akt | AGCGACGTGGCTATTGTGAAG | GCCATCATTCTTGAGGAGGAAGT |
N-cadherin | AGCCAACCTTAACTGAGGAGT | GGCAAGTTGATTGGAGGGATG |
E-cadherin | CGAGAGCTACACGTTCACGG | GGGTGTCGAGGGAAAAATAGG |
GAPDH | GGAGCGAGATCCCTCCAAAAT | GGCTGTTGTCATACTTCTCATGG |
MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; PTEN, phosphatase and tensin homolog.
Wound-healing assay
Cell migration was assessed using scratch-healing assays. Briefly, MKN45 cells stably transfected with miR10a-5p and NC were cultured in 6-well plates (5×105 per well). When the cells grew to 90% confluence, three scratch wounds across each well were formed using a P-200 pipette tip. Fresh DMEM supplemented with reduced (5%) fetal bovine serum (FBS) was added, and the wound-closing procedure was observed for 24 h. Images were captured at 0, 12 and 24 h, respectively.
Invasion assay
For the invasion assay, 1×105 cells were seeded in 100 ml DMEM on the top of polyethylene terephthalate membranes coated with Matrigel (1.5 mg/ml; BD Biosciences Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) within Transwell cell culture inserts (24-well inserts; pore size, 8 mm; Corning Life Sciences, Corning, NY, USA). The bottom chamber was filled with 600 ml DMEM supplemented with 20% FBS. Cells were incubated for 12 h at 37°C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Subsequently, the cells were fixed in 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde and stained with crystal violet. The invasive cells on the gel bottom were visualized under a microscope and quantified by counting the number of cells in three randomly chosen fields at 200-fold magnification.
Vector construction and lentivirus production
Lentiviral (GV209; H1-MCS-CMV-EGFP) particles carrying a miR-10a-5p precursor and its franking control sequence were constructed by GeneChem Co., Ltd., (Shanghai, China). Lentiviral vector for cDNA delivery of MAPK8IP1 was amplified from human cDNA library and cloned into pLVTHM-GFP lentiviral vector (genome.ucsc.edu/). The packaged lentiviruses were named LVmiR10a and LV-MAPK8IP1, respectively. The empty lentiviral vector LV-con was used as a control.
Statistical analysis
SPSS 20.0 software (IBM SPSS., Armonk NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Data were presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean of at least three independent experiments. Two-tailed Student's t-test was used for comparisons of two independent groups. The relationship between MAPK8IP1 and miR-10a expression was explored using Spearman's correlation analysis. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
MAPK8IP1 was downregulated in GC specimens and inversely correlated with miR-10a levels
mRNA levels of MAPK8IP1 in GC specimens and normal gastric mucosa tissues were analyzed by qPCR. The results showed that the mean expression levels of MAPK8IP1 were significantly higher in normal gastric mucosa tissues than in GC specimens (Fig. 1A; P<0.05). Subsequently, MAPK8IP1 was found to correlate with miR-10a expression in the same GC specimens. As shown in Fig. 1B, a significant inverse correlation was observed (2-tailed Spearman's correlation, r=−0.4959; P=0.0053).
MAPK8IP1 is a direct target of miR-10a in GC cells
In GC, miR-10a has an important role in metastasis from primary GC to lymph nodes (23). However, the role and relevant pathways of miR-10a in GC metastasis remain largely unknown. To explore the mechanism of GC cells metastasis induced by miR-10a, whether miR-10a was able to regulate MAPK8IP1 expression in GC cells was investigated. Firstly, a luciferase reporter assay was performed to determine whether miR-10a was able to directly target the 3′ UTR of MAPK8IP1 in GC cells. The target sequence of MAPK8IP1 3′-UTR [wild type (wt) 3′-UTR] or the mutant sequence [mutant (mt) 3′-UTR] was cloned into a luciferase reporter vector (Fig. 2A). MKN45 cells were subsequently transfected with wt or mt 3′-UTR vector and miR-10a mimic. The results showed a significant decrease of luciferase activity when compared with miR control (Fig. 2B, lanes 2 and 3; P<0.01). Cotransfection with anti-miR-10a and wt 3′-UTR vector in MKN45 cells led to a 2.2-fold increase in luciferase activity (Fig. 2B, lanes 4 and 5; P<0.01). Moreover, the activity of mt 3′-UTR vector was unaffected by a simultaneous transfection with miR-10a (Fig. 2B, lanes 7 and 8).
Following this, MKN45 cells were transduced with LV-miR10a at four different multiplicity of infections (MOIs) of 0, 10, 50, and 100 and the MAPK8IP1 mRNA expression levels were examined. As shown in Fig. 2C, exogenic expression of miR-10a led to a dose-dependent decrease in MAPK8IP1 mRNA expression levels. At MOI 100, the mRNA expression level of MAPK8IP1 decreased by 60–70%. Moreover, inhibition of endogenous miR-10a by anti-miR-10a resulted in upregulated expression of MAPK8IP1 in MKN45 cells (Fig. 2D). These results suggested that MAPK8IP1 was a direct target of miR-10a in GC cells.
Targeting of MAPK8IP1 by miR-10a is a major mechanism for gastric cancer metastasis
In 41 patients with GC, a positive correlation between MAPK8IP1 expression and the degree of spread to regional lymph nodes (N stage) of GC was observed (Fig. 3A), suggesting the relevance of MAPK8IP1 to GC metastasis. Subsequently, MKN45 cells were transduced with LV-miR10a at four different MOIs (0, 10, 50, and 100) and a Matrigel invasion assay was used to examine the invasion ability. As shown in Fig. 3B, exogenic expression of miR-10a led to increased invasion ability in MKN45 cells. Furthermore, MAPK8IP1 overexpression rescued the increased invasion of miR-10a effectors in MKN45 cells.
In a wound-healing assay, overexpression of miR-10a markedly accelerated cell migration at the edges of the scratch wound of MKN45 cells (Fig. 3C). Quantitative analyses at 24 h indicated a significant increment in wound closure in miR-10a overexpressing cells compared with control cells (Fig. 3D; P<0.001). However, MAPK8IP1 overexpression rescued the increased migration ability of miR-10a effectors in MKN45 cells. These results suggested that targeting of MAPK8IP1 by miR-10a may be a major mechanism for gastric cancer metastasis.
Cell migration regulators contribute to the metastasis effect induced by miR-10a
Cell-cell junction and PI3K/Akt pathways are involved in the regulation of cell migration progression and are frequently over activated in GC (25,26). To elucidate whether these regulators were involved in the metastasis effect of miR-10a, the mRNA levels of eight cell migration regulators were anayzed in MKN45 cells by qPCR, including β-catenin, Snail, fibronectin, Vimentin, PTEN, Akt, N-cadherin and E-cadherin. The results demonstrated that the levels of β-catenin, Snail, fibronectin, vimentin and N-cadherin were increased by >2.5-fold, whereas the mRNA levels of PTEN and E-cadherin were decreased after miR-10a overexpression. By contrast, anti-miR-10a treatment produced contrasting results (Fig. 4).
Discussion
As demonstrated in previous studies, miRNA are associated with numerous cellular processes, including proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis, and they have an important role in the pathogenesis of cancer (27,28). For example, a previous study by our group demonstrated that EBV-miRBART7-3p was a viral oncomir that is highly overexpressed in NPC tissues, which promotes NPC tumorigenesis (29). Gastric cancer is caused by the interaction of environmental and genetic factors (30). It has been reported that miR-10a is overexpressed in human pancreatic cancer and involved in its invasiveness; retinoic acid receptor antagonists inhibit miR-10a expression and block metastatic behavior of pancreatic cancer (20,21). In a mouse mammary tumor model, therapeutic silencing of miR-10b inhibited metastasis (22). In GC, miR-10a has an important role in metastasis from primary GC to lymph nodes (23). However, the role and relevant pathways of miR-10a in GC metastasis remain largely unknown.
MAPK signaling pathway activation correlates with human cancer progression and metastasis (7). MAPK8IP1 acts as a negative regulator of MAPK activity (31). To explore the mechanism of GC cells metastasis induced by miR-10a, the present study investigated whether miR-10a was able to regulate MAPK8IP1 expression in GC cells. The present findings found that the mean expression level of MAPK8IP1 was significantly elevated in normal gastric mucosa tissues, as compared with GC specimens. Furthermore, it was determined that MAPK8IP1 correlated with miR-10a expression levels in the same GC specimens. Inverse correlation was observed between MAPK8IP1 and miR-10a mRNA expression levels. These results suggested that miR-10a may regulate MAPK8IP1 expression in GC cells.
Luciferase reporter assay and qPCR results suggested that MAPK8IP1 was a direct target of miR-10a in GC cells. In 41 patients with GC, a positive correlation was observed between MAPK8IP1 expression and the degree of spread to regional lymph nodes (N stage) of GC, suggesting the relevance of MAPK8IP1 to GC metastasis. Exogenic expression of miR-10a led to increased invasion ability of MKN45 cells. The present results also showed that MAPK8IP1 overexpression rescued the increased invasion ability of miR-10a effectors in MKN45 cells. In a wound-healing assay, overexpression of miR-10a markedly accelerated cell migration at the edges of the scratch wound of MKN45 cells. However, MAPK8IP1 overexpression rescued the increased migration ability of miR-10a effectors in MKN45 cells. Taken together, these results suggested that targeting of MAPK8IP1 by miR-10a may be a major mechanism for gastric cancer metastasis.
It is well known that a typical miRNA has ~100 target sites and forms a regulatory network (32). PTEN loss and MAPK activation cooperate to promote epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and metastasis in prostate cancer stem cells (7). Cell-cell junction and PI3K/Akt pathways are involved in the regulation of cell migration progression, and are frequently overactivated in GC (33–35). To elucidate whether these regulators were associated with the metastasis effect of miR-10a, the mRNA levels of eight cell migration regulators were examined in MKN45 cells. The present results demonstrated that the levels of β-catenin, Snail, fibronectin, vimentin and N-cadherin were increased by >2.5-fold, whereas the mRNA expression levels of PTEN and E-cadherin were decreased after miR-10a overexpression. By contrast, anti-miR-10a treatment produced contrasting results.
In conclusion, the present study indicated that miR-10a-5p directly targets MAPK8IP1, which is a negative regulator of MAPK activity, and thus may be a major mechanism for gastric cancer metastasis. These findings suggested that miR-10a may be a potential target for the treatment of GC in the future.
References
- 1.Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wakamatsu Y, Sakamoto N, Oo HZ, Naito Y, Uraoka N, Anami K, Sentani K, Oue N, Yasui W. Expression of cancer stem cell markers ALDH1, CD44 and CD133 in primary tumor and lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer. Pathol Int. 2012;62:112–119. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2011.02760.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hsu KW, Hsieh RH, Huang KH, Fen-Yau Li A, Chi CW, Wang TY, Tseng MJ, Wu KJ, Yeh TS. Activation of the Notch1/STAT3/Twist signaling axis promotes gastric cancer progression. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33:1459–1467. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgs165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Takano Y, Kato Y, Masuda M, Ohshima Y, Okayasu I. Cyclin D2, but not cyclin D1, overexpression closely correlates with gastric cancer progression and prognosis. J Pathol. 1999;189:194–200. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199910)189:2<194::AID-PATH426>3.3.CO;2-G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Maruyama K, Gunvén P, Okabayashi K, Sasako M, Kinoshita T. Lymph node metastases of gastric cancer. General pattern in 1931 patients. Ann Surg. 1989;210:596–602. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198911000-00005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Qu JL, Qu XJ, Zhao MF, Teng YE, Zhang Y, Hou KZ, Jiang YH, Yang XH, Liu YP. Gastric cancer exosomes promote tumour cell proliferation through PI3K/Akt and MAPK/ERK activation. Dig Liver Dis. 2009;41:875–880. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2009.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mulholland DJ, Kobayashi N, Ruscetti M, Zhi A, Tran LM, Huang J, Gleave M, Wu H. Pten loss and RAS/MAPK activation cooperate to promote EMT and metastasis initiated from prostate cancer stem/progenitor cells. Cancer Res. 2012;72:1878–1889. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Davis RJ. Signal transduction by the JNK group of MAP kinases. Cell. 2000;103:239–252. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00116-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Thompson NA, Haefliger JA, Senn A, Tawadros T, Magara F, Ledermann B, Nicod P, Waeber G. Islet-brain1/JNK-interacting protein-1 is required for early embryogenesis in mice. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:27745–27748. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C100222200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Crew KD, Neugut AI. Epidemiology of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:354–362. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i3.354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: Target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell. 2009;136:215–233. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Esquela-Kerscher A, Slack FJ. Oncomirs-microRNAs with a role in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:259–269. doi: 10.1038/nrc1840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cao M, Seike M, Soeno C, Mizutani H, Kitamura K, Minegishi Y, Noro R, Yoshimura A, Cai L, Gemma A. MiR-23a regulates TGF-β-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition by targeting E-cadherin in lung cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 2012;41:869–875. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2012.1535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pacurari M, Addison JB, Bondalapati N, Wan YW, Luo D, Qian Y, Castranova V, Ivanov AV, Guo NL. The microRNA-200 family targets multiple non-small cell lung cancer prognostic markers in H1299 cells and BEAS-2B cells. Int J Oncol. 2013;43:548–560. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2013.1963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Verdoodt B, Neid M, Vogt M, Kuhn V, Liffers ST, Palisaar RJ, Noldus J, Tannapfel A, Mirmohammadsadegh A. MicroRNA-205, a novel regulator of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl2, is downregulated in prostate cancer. Int J Oncol. 2013;43:307–314. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2013.1915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wang P, Zou F, Zhang X, Li H, Dulak A, Tomko RJ, Jr, Lazo JS, Wang Z, Zhang L, Yu J. microRNA-21 negatively regulates Cdc25A and cell cycle progression in colon cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2009;69:8157–8165. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Calin GA, Ferracin M, Cimmino A, Di Leva G, Shimizu M, Wojcik SE, Iorio MV, Visone R, Sever NI, Fabbri M, et al. A MicroRNA signature associated with prognosis and progression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1793–1801. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Veerla S, Lindgren D, Kvist A, Frigyesi A, Staaf J, Persson H, Liedberg F, Chebil G, Gudjonsson S, Borg A, et al. MiRNA expression in urothelial carcinomas: Important roles of miR-10a, miR-222, miR-125b, miR-7 and miR-452 for tumor stage and metastasis, and frequent homozygous losses of miR-31. Int J Cancer. 2009;124:2236–2242. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ujifuku K, Mitsutake N, Takakura S, Matsuse M, Saenko V, Suzuki K, Hayashi K, Matsuo T, Kamada K, Nagata I, Yamashita S. miR-195, miR-455-3p and miR-10a (*) are implicated in acquired temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma multiforme cells. Cancer Lett. 2010;296:241–248. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2010.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ohuchida K, Mizumoto K, Lin C, Yamaguchi H, Ohtsuka T, Sato N, Toma H, Nakamura M, Nagai E, Hashizume M, Tanaka M. MicroRNA-10a is overexpressed in human pancreatic cancer and involved in its invasiveness partially via suppression of the HOXA1 gene. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:2394–2402. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2252-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Weiss FU, Marques IJ, Woltering JM, Vlecken DH, Aghdassi A, Partecke LI, Heidecke CD, Lerch MM, Bagowski CP. Retinoic acid receptor antagonists inhibit miR-10a expression and block metastatic behavior of pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology. 2009;137:2136–2145.e1-7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.08.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ma L, Reinhardt F, Pan E, Soutschek J, Bhat B, Marcusson EG, Teruya-Feldstein J, Bell GW, Weinberg RA. Therapeutic silencing of miR-10b inhibits metastasis in a mouse mammary tumor model. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28:341–347. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chen W, Tang Z, Sun Y, Zhang Y, Wang X, Shen Z, Liu F, Qin X. miRNA expression profile in primary gastric cancers and paired lymph node metastases indicates that miR-10a plays a role in metastasis from primary gastric cancer to lymph nodes. Exp Ther Med. 2012;3:351–356. doi: 10.3892/etm.2011.411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Novák J, Fabian P. Comments on the TNM classification of malignant tumours - 7th edition. Klin Onkol. 2011;24:149–150. (In Czech) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Brabletz T, Jung A, Spaderna S, Hlubek F, Kirchner T. Opinion: migrating cancer stem cells - an integrated concept of malignant tumour progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5:744–749. doi: 10.1038/nrc1694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Liu J, Zhang Y, Xu R, Du J, Hu Z, Yang L, Chen Y, Zhu Y, Gu L. PI3K/Akt-dependent phosphorylation of GSK3β and activation of RhoA regulate Wnt5a-induced gastric cancer cell migration. Cell Signal. 2013;25:447–456. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2012.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhang Z, Liu S, Shi R, Zhao G. miR-27 promotes human gastric cancer cell metastasis by inducing epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Cancer Genet. 2011;204:486–491. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2011.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Li X, Zhang Y, Zhang H, Liu X, Gong T, Li M, Sun L, Ji G, Shi Y, Han Z, et al. miRNA-223 promotes gastric cancer invasion and metastasis by targeting tumor suppressor EPB41L3. Mol Cancer Res. 2011;9:824–833. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-10-0529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cai L, Li J, Zhang X, Lu Y, Wang J, Lyu X, Chen Y, Liu J, Cai H, Wang Y, Li X. Gold nano-particles (AuNPs) carrying anti-EBV-miR-BART7-3p inhibit growth of EBV-positive nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2015;6:7838–7850. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Doll R, Peto R. The causes of cancer: Quantitative estimates of avoidable risks of cancer in the United States today. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1981;66:1191–1308. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Harding TC, Xue L, Bienemann A, Haywood D, Dickens M, Tolkovsky AM, Uney JB. Inhibition of JNK by overexpression of the JNL binding domain of MAPK8IP1 prevents apoptosis in sympathetic neurons. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:4531–4534. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C000815200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Saunders MA, Liang H, Li WH. Human polymorphism at microRNAs and microRNA target sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:3300–3305. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611347104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Li D, Qu X, Hou K, Zhang Y, Dong Q, Teng Y, Zhang J, Liu Y. PI3K/Akt is involved in bufalin-induced apoptosis in gastric cancer cells. Anticancer Drugs. 2009;20:59–64. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0b013e3283160fd6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Xie X, Tang B, Zhou J, Gao Q, Zhang P. Inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway increases the chemosensitivity of gastric cancer to vincristine. Oncol Rep. 2013;30:773–782. doi: 10.3892/or.2013.2520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Liu J, Liu Q, Wan Y, Zhao Z, Yu H, Luo H, Tang Z. Osteopontin promotes the progression of gastric cancer through the NF-κB pathway regulated by the MAPK and PI3K. Int J Oncol. 2014;45:282–290. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2014.2393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]