ABSTRACT
Aspergillus flavus has been frequently reported as the leading cause of invasive aspergillosis in certain tropical and subtropical countries. Two hundred A. flavus strains originating from clinical and environmental sources and collected between 2008 and 2015 were phylogenetically identified at the species level by analyzing partial β-tubulin and calmodulin genes. In vitro antifungal susceptibility testing was performed against antifungals using the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) broth microdilution method. In addition, genotyping was performed using a short-tandem-repeat (STR) assay of a panel of six microsatellite markers (A. flavus 2A, 2B, 2C, 3A, 3B, and 3C), in order to determine the genetic variation and the potential relationship between clinical and environmental isolates. The geometric means of the minimum inhibitory concentrations/minimum effective concentrations (MICs/MECs) of the antifungals across all isolates were (in increasing order): posaconazole, 0.13 mg/liter; anidulafungin, 0.16 mg/liter; itraconazole, 0.29 mg/liter; caspofungin, 0.42 mg/liter; voriconazole, 0.64 mg/liter; isavuconazole, 1.10 mg/liter; amphotericin B, 3.35 mg/liter; and flucytosine, 62.97 mg/liter. All of the clinical isolates were genetically different. However, an identical microsatellite genotype was found between a clinical isolate and two environmental strains. In conclusion, posaconazole and anidulafungin showed the greatest in vitro activity among systemic azoles and echinocandins, respectively. However, the majority of the A. flavus isolates showed reduced susceptibility to amphotericin B. Antifungal susceptibility of A. flavus was not linked with the clinical or environmental source of isolation. Microsatellite genotyping may suggest an association between clinical and environmental strains, although this requires further investigation.
KEYWORDS: antifungal susceptibility, Aspergillus flavus, clinical, environmental, genotyping, Iran, molecular epidemiology
INTRODUCTION
Invasive aspergillosis is an important opportunistic fungal infection, particularly in immunocompromised patients (1–3). After Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus flavus (section Flavi) is the second most common opportunistic pathogen causing invasive and superficial infections in humans (4). The fungus is predominantly associated with infections of the respiratory tract, brain, sinuses, eye, and skin, particularly in hot and arid climates, such as North Africa, the Middle East, and India (4, 5). A. flavus is also known to produce aflatoxin in crops, resulting in significant economic damage globally (6, 7). Furthermore, experimental data suggest that A. flavus is significantly more virulent than A. fumigatus (8).
Irrespective of the causative agent, without adequate therapy, invasive aspergillosis is associated with high mortality rates (9). Triazoles are the preferred agents for treatment and prevention of infections caused by Aspergillus species in most patients (10). However, with the widespread use of azoles in clinical practice and agriculture, the emergence of triazole resistance in A. fumigatus has become a global public health concern. Moreover, mutations in A. flavus cyp51A (T788G) and cyp51C (Y319H), both associated with increased MICs to voriconazole, have also been reported recently (11).
Given the prominent role of azoles in the management of aspergillosis (12), it is important to determine the molecular epidemiology and resistance profiles of A. flavus isolates associated with Aspergillus disease (13). In the current study, we evaluated the genetic diversity and in vitro antifungal susceptibilities of a large collection of A. flavus strains obtained from clinical and environmental sources between 2008 and 2015, using PCR sequencing, microsatellite genotyping, and antifungal drug susceptibility profiles using the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) broth microdilution method.
(Parts of these results were presented at the 26th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 9 to 12 April 2016, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, poster no. 0378 [14].)
RESULTS
All isolates were identified as A. flavus by sequence analysis of β-tubulin and calmodulin genes.
Microsatellite genotyping of six short-tandem-repeat (STR) loci showed that all of the clinical isolates were genetically different from each other. However, identical STR genotypes were found between a clinical isolate and two hospital environmental strains. Of note, the patient with the clinical isolate stayed in the same hospital where the identical environmental strains were retrieved, which indicates similar phylogenetic origin and the possibility of the same source. Comparing the genetic relatedness by generating dendrograms of the STR profiles showed that all 200 A. flavus isolates clustered apart and were distinct from 10 A. flavus control strains isolated from patients in the Netherlands and Turkey.
The geometric mean (GM) MICs/MECs, the MIC/MEC ranges, the MIC50/MEC50, and MIC90/MEC90 distributions of the eight antifungals against 200 A. flavus strains are listed in Table 1. The MIC/MEC distributions of all tested antifungals are presented in Fig. 1. The overall results obtained from visual and spectrophotometric readings were not different for the MIC endpoints, and similar results were obtained in replicate experiments.
TABLE 1.
Geometric mean MIC/MEC, MIC/MEC ranges, MIC50/MEC50, and MIC90/MEC90 values of 200 clinical and environmental Aspergillus flavus strains to eight antifungal agents
| Origin of isolation (no. of strains) | Druga | MIC/MEC (mg/liter)b |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Range | MIC50/MEC50 | MIC90/MEC90 | Geometric mean | ||
| All strains (200) | AmB | 1–16 | 4 | 4 | 3.35 |
| ITC | 0.031–4 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.29 | |
| VRC | 0.063–2 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.64 | |
| POS | 0.031–1 | 0.125 | 0.25 | 0.13 | |
| ISA | 0.125–4 | 1 | 2 | 1.10 | |
| CAS | 0.125–2 | 0.25 | 1 | 0.42 | |
| AFG | 0.016–1 | 0.031 | 0.25 | 0.16 | |
| 5-FC | 4–64 | 64 | 64 | 62.97 | |
| Clinical (121) | AmB | 1–8 | 4 | 4 | 3.40 |
| ITC | 0.031–4 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.31 | |
| VRC | 0.25–2 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.69 | |
| POS | 0.031–1 | 0.125 | 0.25 | 0.13 | |
| ISA | 0.5–4 | 1 | 2 | 1.16 | |
| CAS | 0.125–2 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.36 | |
| AFG | 0.016–1 | 0.031 | 0.25 | 0.16 | |
| 5-FC | 8–64 | 64 | 64 | 63.54 | |
| Environmental (79) | AmB | 1–16 | 4 | 4 | 3.26 |
| ITC | 0.031–2 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.25 | |
| VRC | 0.063–2 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.55 | |
| POS | 0.031–0.5 | 0.125 | 0.25 | 0.13 | |
| ISA | 0.125–4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |
| CAS | 0.125–1 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.52 | |
| AFG | 0.016–0.5 | 0.063 | 0.5 | 0.16 | |
| 5-FC | 4–64 | 64 | 64 | 62.08 | |
AmB, amphotericin B; ITC, itraconazole; VRC, voriconazole; POS, posaconazole; ISA, isavuconazole; CAS, caspofungin; AFG, anidulafungin; 5-FC, flucytosine.
MECs were used for caspofungin and anidulafungin. MICs were used for all other drugs.
FIG 1.
MIC/MEC distributions for 200 Aspergillus flavus isolates from clinical and environmental origins. The x axis shows the MICs/MECs (in milligrams per liter), and the y axis shows the number of strains in the set with the given MIC/MEC. Arrow bars indicate epidemiological cutoff values proposed by EUCAST.
The geometric means of the MICs/MECs of the antifungals across all isolates were the following (in increasing order): posaconazole, 0.13 mg/liter; anidulafungin, 0.16 mg/liter; itraconazole, 0.29 mg/liter; caspofungin, 0.42 mg/liter; voriconazole, 0.64 mg/liter; isavuconazole, 1.10 mg/liter; amphotericin B, 3.35 mg/liter; and flucytosine, 62.97 mg/liter.
Overall, posaconazole and anidulafungin showed the greatest in vitro activity among antifungal azoles and echinocandins, respectively, independent of the source of isolation. The highest MIC90 value was 64 mg/liter for flucytosine, which was significantly different from those of the other seven antifungal agents (P < 0.01). Among azoles, the activity of posaconazole (GM MIC, 0.13 mg/liter; MIC range, 0.031 to 1 mg/liter) was at a level similar to that of itraconazole (GM MIC, 0.29 mg/liter; MIC range, 0.031 to 4 mg/liter), and this was followed by the activity of voriconazole (GM MIC, 0.64 mg/liter; MIC range, 0.63 to 2 mg/liter) and isavuconazole (GM MIC, 1.10 mg/liter; MIC range, 0.125 to 4 mg/liter).
No statistically significant differences in the susceptibility profiles of A. flavus were detected between the clinical and environmental sources investigated (Table 1).
DISCUSSION
This study investigated the genetic diversity and antifungal susceptibility profiles of a large collection of clinical and environmental strains of A. flavus. Importantly, the antifungal susceptibility of A. flavus was not linked with the clinical or environmental source of isolation. For all tested strains, antifungal triazoles and echinocandins had low MICs values, whereas flucytosine did not show inhibitory effects (GM MIC, 62.97 mg/liter). The efficacy of flucytosine against Aspergillus infection has long been controversial. Flucytosine was found to be active in vitro against Aspergillus isolates when the MIC was determined at pH 5.0 instead of pH 7.0 (15). In addition, the in vitro MIC at pH 5.0 corresponded to the in vivo efficacy of flucytosine monotherapy in a murine model of invasive aspergillosis (16, 17).
In our study, consistent with several previous reports (18–20), all tested azoles showed potent in vitro activity against all A. flavus isolates. Similarly, Shivaparkash et al. studied the antifungal susceptibility profiles of triazoles against a large collection of clinical (n = 178) and environmental (n = 10) strains of A. flavus originating from India, using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) method (21). Posaconazole had the highest activity (GM MIC, 0.123 mg/liter; MIC range, 0.062 to 0.25 mg/liter), followed by itraconazole (GM MIC, 0.177 mg/liter; MIC range, 0.062 to 0.5 mg/liter), isavuconazole (GM MIC, 0.697 mg/liter; MIC range, 0.125 to 2 mg/liter), and voriconazole (GM MIC, 1.167 mg/liter; MIC range, 0.05 to 4 mg/liter). It is worth mentioning that CLSI clinical breakpoints have not been established for Aspergillus species (22). However, epidemiological cutoff values are available for Aspergillus spp. versus the triazoles, caspofungin, and amphotericin B. The epidemiological cutoff values that captured 95% of the A. flavus wild-type population (organisms in a species-drug combination with no acquired resistance mechanisms) were as follows: posaconazole, 0.25 mg/liter; itraconazole, 1 mg/liter; voriconazole, 1 mg/liter (19, 23); isavuconazole, 1 mg/liter (24); caspofungin, 0.25 mg/liter (25); and amphotericin B, 2 mg/liter (26).
The clinical breakpoint for A. flavus has only been proposed for itraconazole, with ≤1 mg/liter as susceptible and >2 mg/liter as a resistant phenotype, using EUCAST guidelines (27). For other systemic antifungals, there is, however, insufficient evidence to recommend a clinical breakpoint. In the absence of clinical breakpoints, epidemiological cutoff values, although they do not predict therapy outcome as clinical breakpoints do, may aid to distinguish wild-type isolates of Aspergillus spp. with no acquired resistance mechanisms detectable from those that may harbor resistance mutations (19, 28).
The EUCAST epidemiologic cutoff values for triazoles against A. flavus have been proposed according to MIC distributions of wild-type strains of A. flavus, as follows: itraconazole, 1 mg/liter; posaconazole, 0.5 mg/liter (27); voriconazole (29) and isavuconazole (30), 2 mg/liter; and amphotericin B, 4 mg/liter (27). As a comparison, the proposed EUCAST epidemiologic cutoff values for A. flavus were one step higher than those from CLSI.
As shown in Fig. 1, our results demonstrated that wild-type MIC distributions based on the proposed epidemiologic cutoff values of A. flavus were as follows: itraconazole, 98.5%; posaconazole, 99.5%; voriconazole, 100%; isavuconazole, 98%; and amphotericin B, 96%. Of note, the vast majority of A. flavus isolates had MIC values at or below epidemiologic cutoff values for triazoles and amphotericin B, including those from patients who had received these agents.
According to the recent guidelines of Infectious Diseases Society of America, the triazole voriconazole is still the recommended primary therapy for disseminated infections caused by Aspergillus species (10). However, acquired resistance is an emerging concern in A. fumigatus, which is now reported globally (31). Environmental exposure to azole fungicides has been found to be an important route for resistance selection (32), as several azole fungicides have a molecule structure similar to that of medical triazoles (33). Although the exact process of environmental resistance selection in A. fumigatus in not fully understood, exposure of the fungus to azole residues in its natural habitat is thought to be a critical factor. Although one can postulate that similar conditions, i.e., exposure to azole residues, may be present for the habitat of A. flavus, widespread resistance selection in A. flavus has not found. Acquired azole resistance in A. flavus is very uncommon and to date has been reported in only two patients receiving long-term azole therapy. Our result indeed indicates that unlike A. fumigatus, an environmental route of resistance selection is not a concern in A. flavus. Furthermore, in a recent study, using an experimental murine model of disseminated A. flavus infection, voriconazole monotherapy was shown to be effective against both a wild-type isolate without a mutation in the cyp51C gene and a voriconazole-resistant isolate harboring the Y319H substitution in the cyp51C gene (MIC EUCAST, ≥2 mg/liter) (34). The efficacy of voriconazole was correlated with voriconazole exposure in a dose-dependent manner and with the voriconazole MIC of the isolates. Interestingly, even lower exposure was required for A. flavus isolates with higher MICs (34).
We also observed that the MEC values of anidulafungin and caspofungin were relatively low, with MEC ranges of 0.016 to 1 mg/liter and 0.125 to 2 mg/liter, respectively. In agreement with our finding, Pfaller et al. also reported that all three echinocandins (caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin) inhibited a collection of 64 A. flavus isolates (n = 64) at a concentration of ≤0.06 mg/liter using the CLSI method (35). In another study, the mean MIC90 values for anidulafungin, micafungin, and caspofungin were 0.002 mg/liter, 0.002 mg/liter, and 0.032 mg/liter, respectively (36). Lockhart et al. also determined the echinocandin MEC values against 28 A. flavus isolated from patients with transplant-associated infections (37). The MEC ranges for all isolates were as follows: caspofungin and micafungin, 0.008 to 0.03 mg/liter; and anidulafungin, 0.008 to 0.015 mg/liter. Similarly, in our study, anidulafungin (MIC range, 0.016 to 1 mg/liter) appeared to be more potent than caspofungin (MEC range, 0.125 to 2 mg/liter).
Of note, amphotericin B showed relatively high MICs (GM MIC, 3.3.5 mg/liter; MIC range, of 1 to 16 mg/liter) against all A. flavus strains tested, which is in agreement with previous reports from the United States, Europe (38, 39), and the Middle East (36, 40), which reported amphotericin B MICs of >2 mg/liter for clinical A. flavus strains. The in vitro data were also supported by experimental models of systemic aspergillosis against clinical isolates of A. flavus, with various susceptibilities to the polyene (41, 42). The in vivo efficacy studies of amphotericin B demonstrated that a clinical isolate showing an MIC of ≥2 mg/liter may be reasonably considered resistant in vivo to any dose/formulation of amphotericin B (42).
In our study, all the clinical isolates were concluded to be unrelated, as they had unique genotypes. The isolates were collected from different patients, from separate regions of Iran (Table 1), and were collected over an 8-year period. Similarly, the high genetic diversity in A. flavus was observed in clinical strains originating from humans (21) and animals (43). Furthermore, in a previous study, we also showed that clinical and environmental A. fumigatus strains from Iran clustered apart from each other (44). In the present study, however, microsatellite genotypes were matched between a clinical isolate and two environmental strains obtained from the same hospital environments, which may suggest that both clinical and environmental isolates belonged to the same origin and had the possibility of hospital-acquired colonization or infection. However, this requires further investigation. Understanding the correlation between the genotype of the isolates and the clinical disease (45), which may vary from country to country, and therapeutic modalities, including the antifungal susceptibility patterns of causative agents against a panel of available systemic antifungal compounds (46), is a valuable asset for clinicians, clinical mycology/microbiology laboratories, and health care professionals and may guide personalized therapy.
In conclusion, our data showed that triazoles and echinocandins had potent in vitro activity against both clinical and environmental A. flavus isolates. In contrast, 96% of the strains showed reduced susceptibility to amphotericin B, with MICs of ≥2 mg/liter.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Fungal isolates.
A collection of 200 A. flavus strains was investigated, including 121 clinical and 79 environmental samples, as shown in Table 2. The clinical isolates were collected from patients who resided in different parts of Iran and who were admitted to four university hospitals in Tehran, Sari, Hamedan, and Mashhad between 2008 and 2015. The 121 clinical isolates were obtained from patients with various underlying diseases, including hematological malignancies, lung cancer, breast cancer, organ transplantation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, sinusitis, pulmonary and respiratory disorders, tuberculosis with cavity, renal failure, chronic granulomatous disease, autoimmune diseases, diabetes mellitus, and dermatomycoses. All the patient-related data were processed anonymously, and the ethics committee waived informed consent.
TABLE 2.
Origin of 200 Aspergillus flavus isolates from clinical and environmental sources in Iran
| Origin by isolate type | No. (%) of samples |
|---|---|
| Clinical (n = 121) | |
| Bronchoalveolar lavage | 69 (34.5) |
| Nail scraping | 17 (8.5) |
| Sinus biopsy specimen | 14 (7) |
| Skin lesions | 10 (5) |
| Ear swabs | 5 (2.5) |
| Nasal mucosa | 4 (2) |
| Lung biopsy specimen | 2 (1) |
| Environmental (n = 79) | |
| Hospital environment | 56 (28) |
| Hospital's outdoor soil | 23 (11.5) |
| Total | 200 (100) |
The collection of 79 environmental isolates of A. flavus obtained from 23 soil samples of the hospitals (11.5%) and the environment of 56 hospitalization wards (28%) were analyzed. In addition, 10 clinical A. flavus strains originally isolated from patients in the Netherlands and Turkey were used as the control strains in all experiments. All isolates were stored in 10% glycerol broth at −80°C at the Invasive Fungi Research Center of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences in Sari. The isolates were subcultured on Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) supplemented with 0.02% chloramphenicol for 5 days at 35 to 37°C.
Strain identification and PCR sequencing.
The isolates were originally identified by experienced technicians on the basis of macroscopic colony morphology, microscopic morphology of conidia, and conidium-forming structures, and further confirmed by sequence-based analysis of parts of the β-tubulin and calmodulin genes, as described previously (47). To identify isolates to the species level and further analyze their phylogenetic relationships, the partial DNA sequence data from both genes were used as the BLAST query against two Web-accessible databases, those of the Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures (CBS-KNAW) Fungal Biodiversity Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands (http://www.cbs.knaw.nl), and the National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, MD (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).
DNA extraction.
DNA was isolated as described previously (48); in brief, the isolates were cultured on Sabouraud dextrose agar slants. Conidia were harvested and added to 200 μl of breaking buffer (100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8], 2% Triton X-100, 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 1 mM EDTA [pH 8]) with ∼0.1-g glass beads (diameter, 0.4 to 0.6 mm). After shaking by vortexing, conidia were incubated at 70°C for 30 min while shaking. Then, 200 μl of phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) saturated with aqueous buffer (pH 8.0) was added, and samples were incubated for 5 min while they were shaken. After centrifugation for 5 min, the upper phase containing the DNA was transferred to a new tube. One microliter of DNA was used per PCR.
Microsatellite genotyping.
Genotyping was performed on all A. flavus isolates, using a short-tandem-repeat (STR) A. flavus assay, as described previously (13). Briefly, six loci consisting of three dinucleotide-repeat units and three trinucleotide-repeat units (A. flavus 2A, 2B, 2C, 3A, 3B, and 3C) were amplified by using fluorescently labeled primers (6-carboxyfluorescein [FAM], HEX, and 6-carboxytetramethylrhodamine [TAMRA]) (32, 49, 50). The sizes of the fragments were determined by addition of the GeneScan 500 LIZ marker and subsequent analysis of the fragments on the Applied Biosystems 3730 DNA analyzer. Assignment of repeat numbers in each marker was determined from the GeneScan data by using the Peak Scanner version 1.0 software (Applied Biosystems). The sizes of the fragments were determined based on the 500 LIZ marker, and the repeat numbers of these isolates were compared to a collection of 20 A. flavus control isolates. Allele-sharing distance matrices were generated from the tandem-repeat numbers and were used as input to the Neighbor program of the PHYLIP version 3.6 software package to produce dendrograms (51–53).
In vitro antifungal susceptibility testing.
In vitro antifungal susceptibility testing was performed using a broth microdilution method, according to the EUCAST guidelines (54). The final concentrations of the following antifungal agents ranged from 0.016 to 16 mg/liter: amphotericin B, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, isavuconazole, caspofungin, and anidulafungin. Flucytosine was assessed over a 2-fold concentration range, from 0.064 to 64 mg/liter. The MICs of amphotericin B, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, isavuconazole, and flucytosine were determined visually: an inverted mirror was used for comparing the growth in wells containing the drugs with that in the drug-free control well. The MIC results were also read using a microtitration plate spectrophotometric reader (Anthos HTIII; Anthos Labtec Instruments, Salzburg, Austria). The MIC was defined as the lowest antifungal concentration that inhibited growth by 100% after 48 h compared with that of the drug-free well. The minimum effective concentrations (MECs) of caspofungin and anidulafungin were read using a plate microscope (Olympus SZX9; Olympus Nederland, Zoeterwoude, the Netherlands), at ×25 to ×50 magnification. The MECs were defined as the lowest concentration at which atypical, short, and branched hyphal clusters were observed instead of the long unbranched hyphal elements observed in the control well. The ranges and geometric means (GM) of the MICs and MECs were determined for each species and drug after 24 and 48 h of incubation. The MIC/MEC at which 50% (MIC50/MEC50) and 90% (MIC90/MEC90) of the isolates were inhibited were calculated using the aforementioned MIC determination criteria. The MIC50 and MIC90 values were calculated for species present in 10 or more isolates from the same geographic regions. If the MIC values of the replicates were distinct, the GM values of the replicates were used for comparison with other isolates. Paecilomyces variotii (ATCC 22319), Candida parapsilosis (ATCC 22019), and Candida krusei (ATCC 6258) were used for quality controls in all experiments. All experiments on each strain were performed using three independent replicates on different days.
Statistical analysis.
Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism, version 7.0, for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Genotyping diversity and MIC/MEC distributions between the isolates originating from different locations were compared using Student's t test and the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test; differences were considered statistically significant at a P value of ≤0.05 (two-tailed).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
S.S. has received a research grant from Astellas Pharma B.V. P.E.V. has received research grants from Gilead Sciences, Astellas, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), F2G, and Bio-Rad, is a speaker for Gilead Sciences and MSD, and is on the advisory boards for Pfizer, MSD, and F2G. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
This publication was prepared as a collaborative study between the Invasive Fungi Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran (research project fund no. 92180), and the Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
REFERENCES
- 1.Meersseman W, Vandecasteele SJ, Wilmer A, Verbeken E, Peetermans WE, Van Wijngaerden E. 2004. Invasive aspergillosis in critically ill patients without malignancy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 170:621–625. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200401-093OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Denning DW. 1996. Therapeutic outcome in invasive aspergillosis. Clin Infect Dis 23:608–615. doi: 10.1093/clinids/23.3.608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Marr KA, Patterson T, Denning D. 2002. Aspergillosis. Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and therapy. Infect Dis Clin North Am 16:875–894, vi. doi: 10.1016/S0891-5520(02)00035-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hedayati MT, Pasqualotto AC, Warn PA, Bowyer P, Denning DW. 2007. Aspergillus flavus: human pathogen, allergen and mycotoxin producer. Microbiology 153:1677–1692. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2007/007641-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pasqualotto AC. 2009. Differences in pathogenicity and clinical syndromes due to Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillus flavus. Med Mycol 47(Suppl 1):S261–S270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Abbas H, Zablotowicz R, Locke M. 2004. Spatial variability of Aspergillus flavus soil populations under different crops and corn grain colonization and aflatoxins. Can J Bot 82:1768–1775. doi: 10.1139/b04-131. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cotty PJ, Jaime-Garcia R. 2007. Influences of climate on aflatoxin producing fungi and aflatoxin contamination. Int J Food Microbiol 119:109–115. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.07.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ramírez-Camejo LA, Torres-Ocampo AP, Agosto-Rivera JL, Bayman P. 2014. An opportunistic human pathogen on the fly: strains of Aspergillus flavus vary in virulence in Drosophila melanogaster. Med Mycol 52:211–219. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myt008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Walsh TJ, Anaissie EJ, Denning DW, Herbrecht R, Kontoyiannis DP, Marr KA, Morrison VA, Segal BH, Steinbach WJ, Stevens DA, van Burik JA, Wingard JR, Patterson TF, Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2008. Treatment of aspergillosis: clinical practice guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 46:327–360. doi: 10.1086/525258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Patterson TF, Thompson GR III, Denning DW, Fishman JA, Hadley S, Herbrecht R, Kontoyiannis DP, Marr KA, Morrison VA, Nguyen MH, Segal BH, Steinbach WJ, Stevens DA, Walsh TJ, Wingard JR, Young JA, Bennett JE. 2016. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of aspergillosis: 2016 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 63:e1–e60. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Paul RA, Rudramurthy SM, Meis JF, Mouton JW, Chakrabarti A. 2015. A novel Y319H substitution in CYP51C associated with azole resistance in Aspergillus flavus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:6615–6619. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00637-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Seyedmousavi S, Mouton JW, Melchers WJ, Bruggemann RJ, Verweij PE. 2014. The role of azoles in the management of azole-resistant aspergillosis: from the bench to the bedside. Drug Resist Updat 17:37–50. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2014.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rudramurthy SM, de Valk HA, Chakrabarti A, Meis JF, Klaassen CH. 2011. High resolution genotyping of clinical Aspergillus flavus isolates from India using microsatellites. PLoS One 6:e16086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Taghizadeh-Armaki M, Hedayati MT, Melchers JG, Zoll J, Rafati H , Ansari S , Saber S , van der Lee H , Verweij PE , Seyedmousavi S. 2016. Microsatellite genotyping and antifungal susceptibility profile of clinical and environmental Aspergillus flavus strains from Iran, poster 0378. 26th Eur Congr Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 9 to 12 April 2016, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Te Dorsthorst DT, Mouton JW, van den Beukel CJ, van der Lee HA, Meis JF, Verweij PE. 2004. Effect of pH on the in vitro activities of amphotericin B, itraconazole, and flucytosine against Aspergillus isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:3147–3150. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.8.3147-3150.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Verweij PE, Te Dorsthorst DT, Janssen WH, Meis JF, Mouton JW. 2008. In vitro activities at pH 5.0 and pH 7.0 and in vivo efficacy of flucytosine against Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52:4483–4485. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00491-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.te Dorsthorst DT, Verweij PE, Meis JF, Mouton JW. 2005. Efficacy and pharmacodynamics of flucytosine monotherapy in a nonneutropenic murine model of invasive aspergillosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:4220–4226. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.10.4220-4226.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chryssanthou E, Cuenca-Estrella M. 2006. Comparison of the EUCAST-AFST broth dilution method with the CLSI reference broth dilution method (M38-A) for susceptibility testing of posaconazole and voriconazole against Aspergillus spp. Clin Microbiol Infect 12:901–904. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01419.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Espinel-Ingroff A, Diekema DJ, Fothergill A, Johnson E, Pelaez T, Pfaller MA, Rinaldi MG, Canton E, Turnidge J. 2010. Wild-type MIC distributions and epidemiological cutoff values for the triazoles and six Aspergillus spp. for the CLSI broth microdilution method (M38-A2 document). J Clin Microbiol 48:3251–3257. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00536-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pfaller MA, Hata K, Jones RN, Messer SA, Moet GJ, Castanheira M. 2011. In vitro activity of a novel broad-spectrum antifungal, E1210, tested against Candida spp. as determined by CLSI broth microdilution method. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 71:167–170. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2011.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Shivaprakash MR, Geertsen E, Chakrabarti A, Mouton JW, Meis JF. 2011. In vitro susceptibility of 188 clinical and environmental isolates of Aspergillus flavus for the new triazole isavuconazole and seven other antifungal drugs. Mycoses 54:e583–589. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2010.01996.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lass-Flörl C. 2014. Susceptibility testing in Aspergillus species complex. Clin Microbiol Infect 20(Suppl 6):S49–S53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, Ghannoum MA, Rex JH, Alexander BD, Andes D, Brown SD, Chaturvedi V, Espinel-Ingroff A, Fowler CL, Johnson EM, Knapp CC, Motyl MR, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Sheehan DJ, Walsh TJ, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Antifungal Testing Subcommittee. 2009. Wild-type MIC distribution and epidemiological cutoff values for Aspergillus fumigatus and three triazoles as determined by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution methods. J Clin Microbiol 47:3142–3146. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00940-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Espinel-Ingroff A, Chowdhary A, Gonzalez GM, Lass-Florl C, Martin-Mazuelos E, Meis J, Pelaez T, Pfaller MA, Turnidge J. 2013. Multicenter study of isavuconazole MIC distributions and epidemiological cutoff values for Aspergillus spp. for the CLSI M38-A2 broth microdilution method. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:3823–3828. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00636-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Espinel-Ingroff A, Fothergill A, Fuller J, Johnson E, Pelaez T, Turnidge J. 2011. Wild-type MIC distributions and epidemiological cutoff values for caspofungin and Aspergillus spp. for the CLSI broth microdilution method (M38-A2 document). Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:2855–2859. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01730-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Espinel-Ingroff A, Cuenca-Estrella M, Fothergill A, Fuller J, Ghannoum M, Johnson E, Pelaez T, Pfaller MA, Turnidge J. 2011. Wild-type MIC distributions and epidemiological cutoff values for amphotericin B and Aspergillus spp. for the CLSI broth microdilution method (M38-A2 document). Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:5150–5154. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00686-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Arendrup MC, Cuenca-Estrella M, Lass-Florl C, Hope WW, European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST-AFST). 2012. EUCAST technical note on Aspergillus and amphotericin B, itraconazole, and posaconazole. Clin Microbiol Infect 18:E248–E250. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03890.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pfaller M, Boyken L, Hollis R, Kroeger J, Messer S, Tendolkar S, Diekema D. 2011. Use of epidemiological cutoff values to examine 9-year trends in susceptibility of Aspergillus species to the triazoles. J Clin Microbiol 49:586–590. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02136-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hope WW, Cuenca-Estrella M, Lass-Florl C, Arendrup MC, European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing-Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST-AFST). 2013. EUCAST technical note on voriconazole and Aspergillus spp. Clin Microbiol Infect 19:E278–E280. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Arendrup MC, Meletiadis J, Mouton JW, Guinea J, Cuenca-Estrella M, Lagrou K, Howard SJ, Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing (AFST) of the ESCMID European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). 2016. EUCAST technical note on isavuconazole breakpoints for Aspergillus, itraconazole breakpoints for Candida and updates for the antifungal susceptibility testing method documents. Clin Microbiol Infect 22:571.e1–571.e4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Verweij PE, Lestrade PP, Melchers WJ, Meis JF. 2016. Azole resistance surveillance in Aspergillus fumigatus: beneficial or biased? J Antimicrob Chemother 71:2079–2082. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Snelders E, Huis In 't Veld RA, Rijs AJ, Kema GH, Melchers WJ, Verweij PE. 2009. Possible environmental origin of resistance of Aspergillus fumigatus to medical triazoles. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:4053–4057. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00231-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Snelders E, Camps SM, Karawajczyk A, Schaftenaar G, Kema GH, van der Lee HA, Klaassen CH, Melchers WJ, Verweij PE. 2012. Triazole fungicides can induce cross-resistance to medical triazoles in Aspergillus fumigatus. PLoS One 7:e31801. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Rudramurthy SM, Seyedmousavi S, Dhaliwal M, Chakrabarti A, Meis JF, Mouton JW. 2017. Pharmacodynamics of voriconazole against wild-type and azole-resistant Aspergillus flavus isolates in a nonneutropenic murine model of disseminated aspergillosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e01491-16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01491-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Pfaller MA, Boyken L, Hollis RJ, Kroeger J, Messer SA, Tendolkar S, Diekema DJ. 2009. In vitro susceptibility of clinical isolates of Aspergillus spp. to anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin: a head-to-head comparison using the CLSI M38-A2 broth microdilution method. J Clin Microbiol 47:3323–3325. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01155-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Al-Wathiqi F, Ahmad S, Khan Z. 2013. Molecular identification and antifungal susceptibility profile of Aspergillus flavus isolates recovered from clinical specimens in Kuwait. BMC Infect Dis 13:126. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lockhart SR, Zimbeck AJ, Baddley JW, Marr KA, Andes DR, Walsh TJ, Kauffman CA, Kontoyiannis DP, Ito JI, Pappas PG, Chiller T. 2011. In vitro echinocandin susceptibility of Aspergillus isolates from patients enrolled in the Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:3944–3946. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00428-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Colozza C, Posteraro B, Santilli S, De Carolis E, Sanguinetti M, Girmenia C. 2012. In vitro activities of amphotericin B and AmBisome against Aspergillus isolates recovered from Italian patients treated for haematological malignancies. Int J Antimicrob Agents 39:440–443. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2012.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gonçalves SS, Stchigel AM, Cano J, Guarro J, Colombo AL. 2013. In vitro antifungal susceptibility of clinically relevant species belonging to Aspergillus section Flavi. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:1944–1947. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01902-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Badiee P, Alborzi A, Moeini M, Haddadi P, Farshad S, Japoni A, Ziyaeyan M. 2012. Antifungal susceptibility of the aspergillus species by Etest and CLSI reference methods. Arch Iran Med 15:429–432. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Olson JA, Schwartz J, Hahka D, George A, Proffitt RT, Adler-Moore JP. 2012. Differences in efficacy and cytokine profiles following echinocandin or liposomal amphotericin B monotherapy or combination therapy for murine pulmonary or systemic Aspergillus flavus infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:218–230. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00607-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Barchiesi F, Spreghini E, Sanguinetti M, Giannini D, Manso E, Castelli P, Girmenia C. 2013. Effects of amphotericin B on Aspergillus flavus clinical isolates with variable susceptibilities to the polyene in an experimental model of systemic aspergillosis. J Antimicrob Chemother 68:2587–2591. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hadrich I, Drira I, Neji S, Mahfoud N, Ranque S, Makni F, Ayadi A. 2013. Microsatellite typing of Aspergillus flavus from clinical and environmental avian isolates. J Med Microbiol 62:121–125. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.047803-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Mohammadi F, Hashemi SJ, Zoll J, Melchers WJG, Rafati H, Dehghan P, Rezaie S, Tolooe A, Tamadon Y, van der Lee HA, Verweij PE, Seyedmousavi S. 2015. Quantitative analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphism for rapid detection of TR34/L98H- and TR46/Y121F/T289A-positive Aspergillus fumigatus isolates obtained from patients in Iran from 2010 to 2014. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:387–392. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02326-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hadrich I, Makni F, Neji S, Cheikhrouhou F, Sellami H, Ayadi A. 2011. A review molecular typing methods for Aspergillus flavus isolates. Mycopathologia 172:83–93. doi: 10.1007/s11046-011-9406-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Seyedmousavi S, Rafati H, Ilkit M, Tolooe A, Hedayati MT, Verweij P. 2017. Systemic antifungal agents: current status and projected future developments. Methods Mol Biol 1508:107–139. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6515-1_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Balajee SA, Borman AM, Brandt ME, Cano J, Cuenca-Estrella M, Dannaoui E, Guarro J, Haase G, Kibbler CC, Meyer W, O'Donnell K, Petti CA, Rodriguez-Tudela JL, Sutton D, Velegraki A, Wickes BL. 2009. Sequence-based identification of Aspergillus, Fusarium, and Mucorales species in the clinical mycology laboratory: where are we and where should we go from here? J Clin Microbiol 47:877–884. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01685-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Camps SM, van der Linden JW, Li Y, Kuijper EJ, van Dissel JT, Verweij PE, Melchers WJ. 2012. Rapid induction of multiple resistance mechanisms in Aspergillus fumigatus during azole therapy: a case study and review of the literature. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:10–16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05088-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.de Valk HA, Meis JF, Curfs IM, Muehlethaler K, Mouton JW, Klaassen CH. 2005. Use of a novel panel of nine short tandem repeats for exact and high-resolution fingerprinting of Aspergillus fumigatus isolates. J Clin Microbiol 43:4112–4120. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.8.4112-4120.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Snelders E, van der Lee HA, Kuijpers J, Rijs AJ, Varga J, Samson RA, Mellado E, Donders AR, Melchers WJ, Verweij PE. 2008. Emergence of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus and spread of a single resistance mechanism. PLoS Med 5:e219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Balajee SA, Tay ST, Lasker BA, Hurst SF, Rooney AP. 2007. Characterization of a novel gene for strain typing reveals substructuring of Aspergillus fumigatus across North America. Eukaryot Cell 6:1392–1399. doi: 10.1128/EC.00164-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Felsenstein J. 2005. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.6. Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Bowcock AM, Ruiz-Linares A, Tomfohrde J, Minch E, Kidd JR, Cavalli-Sforza LL. 1994. High resolution of human evolutionary trees with polymorphic microsatellites. Nature 368:455–457. doi: 10.1038/368455a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of the ESCMID European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 2008. EUCAST technical note on the method for the determination of broth dilution minimum inhibitory concentrations of antifungal agents for conidia-forming moulds. Clin Microbiol Infect 14:982–984. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02086.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

