Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2017 Apr 25;12(4):e0176067. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176067

A genomics approach identifies selective effects of trans-resveratrol in cerebral cortex neuron and glia gene expression

Gemma Navarro 1,2,3, Eva Martínez-Pinilla 4,*, Alejandro Sánchez-Melgar 5, Raquel Ortiz 3, Véronique Noé 6,7, Mairena Martín 5, Carlos Ciudad 6,7,#, Rafael Franco 1,2,3,#
Editor: Barbara Bardoni8
PMCID: PMC5404873  PMID: 28441400

Abstract

The mode of action of trans-resveratrol, a promising lead compound for the development of neuroprotective drugs, is unknown. Data from a functional genomics study were retrieved with the aim to find differentially expressed genes that may be involved in the benefits provided by trans-resveratrol. Genes that showed a significantly different expression (p<0.05, cut-off of a two-fold change) in mice fed with a control diet or a control diet containing trans-resveratrol were different in cortex, heart and skeletal muscle. In neocortex, we identified 4 up-regulated (Strap, Pkp4, Rab2a, Cpne3) and 22 down-regulated (Actn1, Arf3, Atp6v01, Atp1a3, Atp1b2, Cacng7, Crtc1, Dbn1, Dnm1, Epn1, Gfap, Hap, Mark41, Rab5b, Nrxn2, Ogt, Palm, Ptprn2, Ptprs, Syn2, Timp2, Vamp2) genes upon trans-resveratrol consumption. Network analysis of gene products provided evidence of plakophilin 4 up-regulation as a triggering factor for down-regulation of events related to synaptic vesicle transport and neurotransmitter release via underexpression of dynamin1 and Vamp2 (synaptobrevin 2) as node-gene drivers. Analysis by RT-qPCR of some of the selected genes in a glioma cell line showed that dynamin 1 mRNA was down-regulated even in acute trans-resveratrol treatments. Taken all together, these results give insight on the glial-neuronal networks involved in the neuroprotective role of trans-resveratrol.

Introduction

Phytochemicals are in the front line to combat oxidative stress, mainly in the central nervous system (CNS), which loses detoxification potential upon aging. In fact, aging is the main risk factor in the two most prevalent neurodegenerative diseases in Western societies with high life expectances: Parkinson’s (PD) and Alzheimer’s (AD) [1]. Unlike AD [2], PD patients have efficacious therapies that address symptoms but do not result in neuroprotection, i.e. they not impede disease progression [3,4]. 3, 5, 4′-trihydroxy-stilbene, commonly known as resveratrol, is among the most promising natural compounds with neuroprotective potential. Interest in resveratrol came from noticing that part of the benefits Mediterranean diet were due to consumption of wine, which is considered the main natural source of the compound. The natural molecule was first identified in 1939 by a Japanese researcher, Michio Takaoka, after extraction and purification from a medicinal herb, Veratrum album var grandiflorum [5,6]. Resveratrol naturally exists in cis- and trans-configurations although trans-resveratrol (RSV) seems to be the most biologically active isomer.

Two courses of action are designed to assess neuroprotection of RSV, one, epidemiologically based, consists on longitudinal studies of cohorts drinking wine in a daily basis. Nevertheless, RSV intake in “chronic” but moderate consumption of wine is probably not enough to boost innate antioxidant mechanisms. In this direction, a combination of different natural products in daily diets [up to 337 polyphenols are reported in a French population of circa 5000 participants with a total intake of approximately 1 g/day; cohort SUpplémentation en VItamines et Minéraux AntioXydants (SU.VI.MAX)], [7], may have an impact on reducing oxidative stress. The second approach is to assess the effect of RSV on nerve cells as a dietary supplement and at concentrations that are comparatively higher than those found in wine. Special care in such studies has to be taken in converting doses tested in rodents to doses in humans [8]. A placebo-controlled, double-blind trial has even showed that RSV administration to mild-to-moderate AD patients is safe and modifies some of the validated AD biomarkers [9].

The neuroprotective actions of RSV have been studied in both in vivo and in vitro models of AD [reviewed in [10]]. The results in animal models have been always promising despite the limited knowledge on how to afford neuroprotection and the limited knowledge of the molecular basis of RSV benefits. The antioxidant potential of RSV does not seem the cause of its beneficial effect as deduced from the trials on "antioxidant and Alzheimer’s" registered in ClinicalTrials.gov a US-National Institutes of Health-dependent office. With the exception of vitamin E, none of the tested compounds of this study (coenzyme Q, fish oil or an ultrafiltrate of animal blood that has to be intravenously administered) led to positive results. The potential benefit of vitamin E did not exceed the effect of the main drug prescribed to AD patients, memantine (an allosteric modulator of NMDA receptors). In fact, despite its “antioxidant” power, vitamin E may even be a pro-oxidant for plasma lipoproteins [11,12]. Results were unfortunately more deceiving on testing antioxidants to combat PD as 24 trials gave negative results. Parkinson’sUK (https://www.parkinsons.org.uk) indicates: “Excessive amounts of antioxidant vitamin supplements can adversely affect your health and wellbeing, and may interfere with your Parkinson's medication”. Based on the hypothesis of antioxidants as neuroprotective agents, a further issue is the need for these compounds to reach the CNS with fairly intact antioxidant capabilities. It is unlikely that RSV penetrates the brain with significant antioxidant power. The aim of the present study was to analyze genomic data from experiments with rodents taking RSV in their diet and to identify genes that may mediate the reported beneficial effects of RSV in the CNS.

Results

Effect of RSV in gene expression

The main objective of this work was to study whether RSV affects gene expression in the brain and how this can be related with neuroprotection in neurodegenerative diseases. A previous analysis was performed taking advantage of similar data available from experiments in two other tissues, skeletal muscle and heart [13]. Therefore, our first aim was to analyze whether the effect of RSV in gene expression impacted on the same genes in the three different tissues (neocortex, skeletal muscle and heart). The analysis was conducted using GEO2R with default settings (see Methods), which provided a list of 250 differentially expressed genes for each tissue. An example of raw data for four of the genes differentially expressed upon RSV intake is shown in Fig 1. Lists were compared and a Venn diagram was constructed, as shown in Fig 2. Using a cut-off of change in gene expression of two-fold no gene could be found in common as differentially expressed in all three tissues. The significance level of pairwise comparison was 0.05 according to the Fisher test. Therefore, it appears that RSV affects the expression of different genes in different tissues.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Raw data for four different genes: Atp1b2 (A), Dnm1 (B), Rab1 (C) and Vamp2 (D). Each red bar represents, in relative units (RU), the expression measurement from a sample. The five replicates correspond to five different animals (under control or under RSV-containing diets). (source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/geo2r/?acc=GSE11291).

Fig 2. Venn diagram constructed with lists of differentially expressed genes corresponding to the three tissues (neocortex, heart and muscle) as identified using the GEO2R tool.

Fig 2

The lists of genes were first curated as indicated in Material and Methods.

RSV and differential gene expression in the CNS

When comparing the expression in neocortex from mice taking or not RSV in their diet, we selected those genes that were up or down by two-fold and with a p<0.05 (adjusted, Benjamini & Hochberg -false discovery rate- test). Analysis of gene expression using GeneSpring provided a list of genes whose number varies according to the selected parameters (Table 1). The list of the 149 genes selected according to the criteria of two-fold cut-off and p<0.05 is provided as S1 Table. The list of the 250 genes selected by GEO2R according to default options, i.e. Benjamini & Hochberg false discovery rate adjustment to the p-values, auto-detect log transformation and NBCI-generated platform annotation to display results and to the criteria of higher statistical potency (lower p-values thus providing more confidence in the effect of RSV) is provided as S2 Table. The R script is provided in S2 Text. Fold-change values from the two lists are slightly different because list summarization by GeneSpring is performed combining intensity values from different probes of a given gene in the probe set, to get a simple intensity value for each gene. The default list obtained by GEO2R ranks gene expression according to the statistical significance (-increasing- P value) of the fold change calculated for each individual probe. Hence, fold-changes in GEO2R do not correspond to the expression of genes but to the expression of individual probes.

Table 1. Number of differentially expressed genes detected by GeneSpring depending on p-value and absolute fold change (FC) values.

Analysis of data, from control- and RSV-enriched diet both in quintuplicates, were performed using moderated T-test, the multiple testing correction of Benjamini-Hochberg and asymptotic p-value (adjusted) computation.

p all p < 0.05 p < 0.02 p < 0.01 p < 0.005 p < 0.001
FC all 45101 8684 6166 4729 3623 1782
FC > 1.1 19195 8684 6166 4729 3623 1782
FC > 1.5 1338 1275 1232 1192 1133 903
FC > 2.0 158 149 148 145 144 129
FC > 3.0 6 6 6 6 6 6

We used a Venn diagram to look for genes present in both lists (from GEO2R and GeneSpring analysis). Curating the list of coincident genes (see Methods), we selected 26 for further study. As shown in Table 2, most genes (22 out of 26) were down-regulated in the neocortex of animals treated with RSV. With these 26 candidates we used panther (www.pantherdb.org/) to draw Gene Ontology bar charts based on three different criteria: biological process, cell localization and molecular function (Fig 3). It should be noted that the percentage of down-regulated genes was even higher (91%) in the non-curated list.

Table 2. Selected differentially expressed genes.

Gene Symbol Gene Title FC-G2R* FC-GS* Expression
Strap Serine/threonine kinase receptor associated protein 1.653 3.105 Up
Pkp4 Plakophilin 4 1.579 2.166 Up
Rab2a Member RAS oncogene family 1.518 2.413 Up
Cpne3 Copine III 1.345a 2.167a Upa
Actn1 Actinin, alpha 1 0.422 0.496 Down
Arf3 ADP-ribosylation factor 3 0.418 0.456 Down
Atp6v01 ATPase, H+ transporting, lysosomal V0 subunit A1 0.512 0.489 Down
Atp1a3 ATPase, Na+/K+ transporting, alpha 3 polypeptide 0.213 0.210 Down
Atp1b2 ATPase, Na+/K+ transporting, beta 2 polypeptide 0.343 0.389 Down
Cacng7 Calcium channel, voltage-dependent, gamma subunit 7 0.365 0.409 Down
Crtc1 CREB regulated transcription coactivator 1 0.456 0.460 Down
Dbn1 Drebrin 1 0.296 0.355 Down
Dnm1 dynamin 1 0.305 0.344 Down
Epn1 Epsin 1 0.464 0.472 Down
Gfap Glial fibrillary acidic protein 0.475 0.472 Down
Hap1 Huntingtin-associated protein 1 0.490 0.475 Down
Mark4 MAP/microtubule affinity-regulating kinase 4 0.062 0.460 Down
Rab5b Member RAS oncogene family 1.518 0.484 Down
Nrxn2 Neurexin II 0.330 0.370 Down
Ogt O-linked N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) transferase (UDP-N-acetylglucosamine-polypeptide-N-acetylglucosaminyl transferase 0.377 0.370 Down
Palm Paralemmin 0.438 0.494 Down
Ptprn2 Protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type, N polypeptide 2 0.375 0.393 Down
Ptprs Protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type, S 0.359 0.450 Down
Syn2 Synapsin II 0.464 0.471 Down
Timp2 Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2 0.436 0.442 Down
Vamp2 Vesicle-associated membrane protein 2 0.336 0.343 Down

* Resveratrol-enriched versus control diet. FC-G2R: Fold Change according with GEO2R. FC-G2R: Fold Change according with GeneSpring.

a Despite different FC values from GEO2R and GeneSpring analysis, the gene is upregulated.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Gene Ontology bar charts for three different criteria: biological process (A), cell localization (B) and molecular function (C). The list of differentially expressed genes after RSV diet in neocortex were classified by Gene Ontology (GO) and drawn using Panther (www.pantherdb.org/)

Among molecular function, protein binding was the most represented group with 31% of the genes, followed by catalytic activity (26%) and structural function (15%). With respect to biological processes, cell communication (26%) was the most important biological process followed by metabolism (16%) and localization (18%). Finally, regarding cell localization, the majority of gene products were in intracellular organelles.

Noteworthy, further relevant information was obtained by using STRING (STRING CONSORTIUM 2016), a public available tool that allows the generation of functional protein association networks. The resulting network, taking into account all genes displayed in Table 2, is shown in Fig 4. Remarkably, the low protein-protein interaction enrichment p-value (2.27 e-29) indicated significantly more interactions than expected from a random set of proteins of similar size, drawn from the genome, meaning that the products of the identified genes are most likely biologically connected. The following genes did not display connections with other genes: Ptprs, Rab2a, Dbn1, Cpne3, Timp2, Palm, Cacng7, Strap and Gfap. Apart from a marginal but interesting connection between Mark4 and Crtc1, all other genes were connected via two main nodes, namely Dnm1 and Vamp2. These two genes were interrelated and, whereas Dnm1 establishes direct links with Pkp4, Rab5b and Epn1, and indirect links with Ogt, Actn1 and Arf3, Vamp2 establishes direct links with Atp1a3, Syn2, Ptprn2, and indirect ones with Atp1b2 and Hap 1. For comparison purposes a network constructed using the non-curated list is provided in S1 Fig. When the STRING analysis was performed using the non-curated list, we basically found the same main hubs, Dnm1 and Vamp2, although the number of non-connected genes was much higher and this fact reinforces the appropriateness of list curation. However, in the case of Dnm1 the connection through Epn1 was further enriched with Aes and Atp6v0a1; and in the case of Vamp2, the interaction with Syn2 was further connected with an additional hub, Dlg4. The PPI enrichment p-value for this list was higher than the one obtained with the curated list, 2.73 e-09, but still showing that this network has significantly more interactions than expected from random assignments using proteins of similar size drawn from the genome.

Fig 4. Network analysis using STRING.

Fig 4

The list of differentially expressed genes in neocortex after RSV diet was subjected to Network analysis using the STRING software as described in Methods. Square interaction score was set at medium confidence (0.4; scores range from highest, 0.9, to low, 0.15, confidence). Other selected parameters were: average node degree: 1.12, local clustering coefficient: 0.32 and active interaction sources including: text mining, experiments, databases, co-expression, neighborhood, gene fusion and co-occurrence. Moreover, no restrictions were forced in the number of interactions to show. Overexpressed genes are shown within red rectangles. The colors of the edges represent the different types of protein associations, either from known or predicted interactions: from curated databases (blue), experimentally determined (magenta), text mining (green) and co-expression (black).

Effects of acute RSV treatment in glioma C6 cells

Neocortex is composed of a variety of neuronal and glial cell types. Therefore, the differential expression of the 26 candidate genes may occur in different CNS cells. Based on the data of RSV effect in neocortex and as neuronal cells of the adult mammal CNS are more refractory than glial cells to early changes in gene expression [1416] we treated a glial cell line, C6, either in the absence (control group) or in the presence of 100 μM RSV for 24 h. Specific mRNA expression for 5 genes selected from the list in Table 2, Atp1b2, Dnm1, Rab2a and Vamp2, was determined by Real-Time qRT-PCR (see Methods). Dnm1 and Vamp2 were selected because they were nodes having more edges in Fig 5. Atp1b2 was selected because genes related to energy-homeostasis are very relevant in glia-neuron interactions, and Rab2a was selected because it is similarly important for vesicular fusion and trafficking as Vamp2. The mRNA for Syn2 was also analyzed as a control for a gene not expressed in glia (its mRNA was not detectable in glioma C6 cells). As seen in Fig 5, acute RSV treatment did not induce changes in the expression of Rab2a or Vamp2, whereas it induced a non-statistically significant increase in Atp1b2 and, remarkably, led to a statistically significant down-regulation of Dnm1.

Fig 5. Gene expression evaluated by reverse transcription, quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) in control and in 100 μM RSV-treated C6 glioma cells.

Fig 5

mRNA samples isolated from cells incubated for 24 h were analyzed by RT-qPCR using specific probes for Atp1b2, Vamp2, Rab2a, and Dnm1. β-actin mRNA was used as control. Data are mean ± SEM of four independent experiments. * p < 0.05 according to Student’s t test.

Discussion

A first aim of this work was to compare the effect of RSV on gene expression in three different tissues. Tissues came from the same animals, C57BL/6xC3H/He mice, which received equally similar caging and environmental conditions. Moreover, the genomics methodology was identical and, therefore, the results are fully comparable. RSV affects gene expression in a different way in heart, neocortex and skeletal muscle, i.e. the effect was tissue-specific. Also of interest is highlighting that this differential effect in the three tissues does not cause major side effects and, in fact, RSV is a safe compound that may be taken at high doses without significant phenotypic alterations. Safety in animals agrees with the safety of the compound shown in a clinical trial involving mil-to-moderate AD patients [9].

The main objective of the present work was to take advantage of genomics data to understand how consumption of RSV is affecting CNS functionality. No gross alterations in gene expression were expected since RSV-consuming animals did not display any particular neural-related phenotype (peripheral or central) [13]. Indeed, the expression of several genes was affected but the fold change, i.e. the expression in RSV-taking animals versus the expression in animals taking the standard diet was relatively small. In this regard, 22 out of the 26 selected genes whose expression is significantly affected by the use of RSV are down-regulated. Therefore, it seems that the reported beneficial effect of RSV in CNS alterations [see [17] for review] correlates with simultaneous reduction of the expression of different genes. Network analysis showed that among interconnected genes (under moderate stringent parameters) all but Pkp4 were down-regulated. The three main nodes in the network constituted by 14 genes (Fig 4) were Pkp4 Dnm1 and Vamp2; pkp4 and Dnm1, and Dnm1 and Vamp2, which were connected in a direct way (Fig 4). Overall it seems that up-regulation of Pkp4 drives the down-regulation of Dnm1 and Vamp2, which in turn drives the down-regulation of the other 11 genes in the network. This hypothesis is further supported by the fact that Pkp4 is the only upregulated gene in the network, and by the finding that all genes directly connected to Pkp4 (Dnm1, Actn1 and Ogt) are down-regulated. The product of Pkp4, plakophilin 4 or p0071, an armadillo/catenin family member, is relevant for cytoskeletal organization [18] and seems to be expressed in both neurons [19] and glia [20]. Dnm gene products, dynamins, are large GTPases that polymerize and contribute to scission and fission of vesicles from membranes being their principal function related to endocytosis and vesicle transport. In particular, Dnm1 is heavily expressed in brain and also acts as microtubule-, and phospholipid-binding protein [21,22]. The product of Vamp2, synaptobrevin-2, a member of the vesicle-associated membrane protein (VAMP)/synaptobrevin family, is widely expressed in the CNS [23], interacts with synaptophysin and regulates inter alia pre-synaptic vesicle traffic [24] and neuronal morphogenesis and the branching of axons [25]. In summary, the protein product of up-regulated Pkp4 and most of the down-regulated genes in the network take part, directly or indirectly, in events related to the cytoskeleton and to the transport of subcellular components. Some of the functions of gene products in Table 2 focus on the synapse, specifically in the mobilization of the presynaptic vesicles and the fusion of those with the presynaptic membrane and the subsequent neurotransmitter release.

Regarding the potential benefits of RSV consumption in AD therapy, literature indicates that this phytochemical affects in a neuroprotective mode three pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease: it reduces i) the pathology caused by β-amyloid peptide [2630], ii) oxidative stress [31] and iii) neuroinflammation [3234]. It should be also noted that RSV modulates the expression of genes involved in cytoskeletal structure and vesicular traffic in soma, neuronal axon/ramifications and nerve terminals, including synaptic pruning, something that does not occur in heart or muscle [35]. Importantly, our results do not favor antioxidant actions due to RSV. It is unlikely that an antioxidant-behaving molecule mainly affects cytoskeleton structure and/or vesicular traffic and synaptic events.

Three of the four genes that were upregulated, Rab2a, Strap and Cpne3, and 6 down-regulated genes, Gfap, Ptprs, Dbn1, Timp2, Palm, Cacng7, do not appear interrelated in the constructed network. The lack of connections among these genes may reflect underscoring glial genes due to the higher qualitative and quantitative research focused on neuronal genes. In fact, the lack of interconnections in the case of Gfap, whose product is the glial fibrillary acidic protein, i.e. a glial protein, together with the finding that Dnm1 is differentially expressed in C6 cells treated with the phytochemical (Fig 5), suggest that glia could have a significant role in mediating the effect of RSV. Furthermore, exosomes, which appear as important in brain glial-neuronal networks [36] may be produced by glia in a process in which some of the differentially expressed genes found in this study are involved. An example is copine 3, a product of Cpn3, that in our opinion deserves attention in the CNS for being ubiquitous and for its role as a calcium-dependent phospholipid-binding protein [37,38]. To our knowledge there are no studies on Cpn3 expression and function in neurons or glia.

Our last aim was to identify any significant gene whose expression would vary after an acute treatment with RSV. We hypothesized that acute changes in neuronal cultures would not be as informative and significant as acute changes in glial cells. Neuronal plasticity resulting in neuroprotective or memory-enhancing properties requires time and involves a myriad of glial-neuronal interactions [39]. In addition, any region in the CNS has more diversity in neuronal than in glial cell types. Thus, the study of RSV-induced changes in a given neuronal cell type may not be correlated to other neuronal cell types present in the same CNS area. The less specialized function of glial cells could serve to find an early event that may help to understand how glia participates in the effects of RSV on CNS. Hence, we used a well-established C6 glioma cell line [40], which has characteristics of stem cells such as multi-lineage differentiation and self-renewal [41]. Upon treatment with RSV, the expression of Dynamin 1 (Dnm1) was changed but not for other genes (Fig 5) whose expression was determined in parallel. The direction of the change was similar to that obtained upon chronic treatment in mice, i.e. the treatment with RSV decreased Dnm1 mRNA levels. Since its discovery, cloning and release of expression data, the enrichment of Dnm1 in CNS was attributed to neuronal expression. In our control using a neuronal-specific gene we demonstrated that glioma cells express the Dnm1 gene and that its expression is affected by RSV, even in acute treatments. Of note is that another functional genomics study indicates that Dnm1 is expressed in glia-derived cell lines (NCBI-GEO, ref. GDS4296). In this sense, our RT-qPCR analyses indicate that glial Dnm1 should be also taken into account to understand the overall mode of action of RSV in the CNS. Recent studies in Drosophila melanogaster have taken advantage of temperature sensitive alleles of shibire, whose product is a dynamin [42,43], to show that this glial protein is required for programmed axon pruning and stabilization of motor neuron branches during metamorphosis [44,45]. Even if there are very few studies of dynamins in mammalian neural cells, the work of Sakai et al. (2013) is remarkable as it shows that Dnm1 is expressed in microglia and regulates the activity of voltage-gated ion channels [46]. Taken all these data together, it appears that the role of dynamin 1 as a central node in the network of differentially expressed genes (Fig 4) may be due to neuronal dynamin 1 even though the glial gene must also be taken into account.

Finally, our findings detect a decrease in the expression of CREB-regulated transcription coactivator 1 (Crtc1) upon RSV consumption. This result suggests that the benefits on this compound in diseases with cognition deficits might be by CREB-independent mechanisms. On the one hand, it is well established that activation of CREB by phosphorylation leads to synaptic plasticity and has memory-enhancing properties [47]. On the other hand, RSV may revert the cognition impairment in chronic unpredictable stress conditions [48]. Taken together, these results indicate that either memory-enhancer properties of CREB could be independent of Crtc1 levels or chronic consumption of RSV exerts memory-enhancing effects by a CREB/Crtc1-independent pathway. This latter hypothesis may fit with the beneficial effects of RSV intake in PD models; in which such benefits are not associated to CREB activation [4951]. As above mentioned our results do not favor, as reported elsewhere Lu et al. (2008), neuroprotection against dopamine denervation in PD models due to antioxidant or radical scavenging properties of the compound [52].

Despite limitations in this type of study, namely heterogeneity of cell type in neocortex, limited number of verified genes, usage of a glioma cell line that is different from real glial cells present in the brain, it is tempting to speculate that RSV achieves a modulation of gene expression in the CNS that positively affects the life span and the functionality of nerve cells by default mechanisms common to many of them. The products of the genes in Table 2 may serve as a good starting point for the study of neuroprotective effects of RSV and the role of neuron-glia interactions in different neurodegenerative diseases and to look for transversal mechanisms of neuroprotection.

Material and methods

Data retrieval

Data were searched within the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database under “GEO DataSets” (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gds/) using as keywords: resveratrol and neocortex, selecting the only hit, i.e. the report by Barger et al., [13] with reference ID “GSE11291” (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE11291) which refers to a study where the design consisted in feeding male (C57BL/6xC3H/He) F1 hybrid mice from 14 to 30 months of age with either a control diet, a RSV-containing diet or a calorie restricted diet [13]. In the present study, these data were analyzed using two different software tools: GEO2R and GeneSpring (see “Data analysis tools” section). Retrieved data resulted from gene expression determined using Affymetrix Mouse Genome 430 2.0 arrays, the specific platform used was GPL 1261, containing probes for 45,000 genes. The profiling was assayed in samples from heart, skeletal muscle and brain (neocortex) [13]. The control diet provided 84 kcal whereas the calorie restricted one provided 63 kcal per mouse and week. RSV supplement (4.9 mg/Kg and day) was given to animals taking the control diet. At 30 months of age, mice were sacrificed and tissues were collected, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°. Functional genomics experiments were performed with these samples. For each condition, five replicates were processed and the results for 4 genes are shown in Fig 1. Representative graphs show that the five replicates have small standard deviation in both conditions, either from animals taking control diet or from animals taking a RSV-containing diet.

Data analysis tools

GEO2R (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/info/geo2r.html) was used to perform comparisons on GSE11291 data using GEO query and limma (Linear Models for Microarray Analysis) R packages from the Bioconductor project (www.bioconductor.org). The approach for false positive detection is reported elsewhere [53]. It should be noted that GEO2R has a feature that checks the character of values and, if required, it automatically performs a base 2 log transformation. Raw results are shown in S1 Table, which lists 250 differentially expressed genes ranked by p-value.

For comparison purposes we also used GeneSpring, which is a commercially-available software package specially designed for analysis of microarray data [54]. By retrieving the genomics data from control- and RSV-enriched diet both in quintuplicates (10 data files in total), and by subsequent analysis using RMA (robust microarrays average) summarization algorithm, baseline to median of control samples, a fold change cut-off higher than 2, moderated T-test, the multiple testing correction of Benjamini-Hochberg and asymptotic <0.05 p-value (adjusted) computation, we obtained 149 differentially expressed genes (S2 Table and S1 Text).

The raw lists of differentially expressed genes were manually curated. Genes not selected for further studies were those whose physiological role is not known and/or whose cell/tissue function is not established. First of all, genes whose products are suspected due to homology to genes from other species (e.g. Drosophila) were discarded. Examples are: Ap2a1 (the gene product is: adaptor-related protein complex 2, alpha 1 subunit), Actl6b (the gene product, actin-like 6B, shares sequence homology with actin with no defined function) and Bicd2 (the gene product is: bicaudal D homolog 2 of Drosophila) or Cnih2 (the gene product is: cornichon homolog 2 of Drosophila).

Online tools for network construction

With a list of two-fold differentially expressed genes in samples from mice fed with/without RSV, it is possible to look for functional relationships among the gene products. Connections between gene products can be conceptualized as networks and the size and complexity of these networks present a unique opportunity to look the transcriptome as something more than just a static collection of data [55,56]. The “network view” of genes whose expression correlate in two given situations is increasingly being used in many areas of applied biology such as to increase the statistical power in human genetics, to aid in drug discovery, to close gaps in metabolic enzyme knowledge and to predict phenotypes and gene functions [55,56].

We took advantage of online resources to integrate both known and predicted interactions (Functional protein association networks). Interactions in STRING (Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes) are provided with confidence scores and this tool also offers accessory information such as protein domains and 3D structures (with link to databases) if available. The version of the program accessed via STRING DB website (http://string-db.org. [55]) included > 2000 organisms, ranging from Bacteria and Archaea to humans. Selected parameters were: average node degree: 1.12 and average local clustering coefficient: 0.32. Medium confidence (0.4) was selected as square interaction score (scores range from highest, 0.9, to low, 0.15, confidence) and active interaction sources included were: text mining, experiments, databases, co-expression, neighborhood, gene fusion and co-occurrence. No restrictions in the number of interactions to show.

Cell culture and RSV treatment

Rat C6 glioma cells were used to study gene expression as they have been previously used as cell model for the treatment of RSV and have showed to be able to uptake this polyphenol [56]. Rat C6 glioma cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, USA). The cell clone was originally developed from a N-nitrosomethylurea-induced rat glial tumor [57]. Cells were grown, as described elsewhere [58], in DMEM (Dulbecco´s modified Eagle´s medium) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1% non-essential amino acids and antibiotics, in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2 at 37°C. Cells in complete medium were incubated in the absence or in the presence of 100 μM RSV (Sigma Aldrich, Madrid, Spain) for 24 h as previously used by other authors using the same cell line [59]. At this concentration, RSV have previously showed neuroprotection against oxidative stress [60]. Dilutions from a concentrated RSV solution in ethanol were used. The final concentration of ethanol in the samples (both control and RSV-treated) was 0.4% v:v)

Total RNA isolation and preparation of cDNA

Total RNA was extracted from C6 glioma cells using ABI 6100 Nucleic Acid PrepStation and chemicals according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). RNA purity was assessed by the 260:280 nm absorbance ratio; it was in the range 1.9–2.1. RNA concentrations were determined from the absorbance at 260 nm. Total RNA was stored at -80°C. One microgram of total RNA was reverse transcribed using Applied Biosystems’ High-Capacity cDNA Archive Kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).

Quantitative real time PCR analysis

To assess relative gene expression in both control and RSV treated rat C6 glioma cells, quantitative real time-PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis was performed with an Applied Biosystems Prism 7500 Fast Sequence Detection System, using TaqMan universal PCR master mix according to the manufacturer’s specifications (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The TaqMan probes and primers for Atp1b2 (assay ID: Rn00569739-m1), Vamp2 (assay ID: Rn01465442_m1), Rab2a (assay ID: Rn00581858_m1), Dnm1 (assay ID: Rn00589865_m1) and β-actin (assay ID: Rn00578826_m1) were assay-on-demand gene expression products (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) as previously described [61]. β-actin was used as endogenous control for normalization.

Statistics and data analysis of PCR assays

Data are mean ± SEM of four independent experiments. Statistical data analysis was performed using Student t-test with the GraphPad Prism 6 program (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Differences between mean values were considered statistically significant at p<0.05.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Differential gene expression (resveratrol versus control diet) in neocortex by GeneSpring analysis.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Differential gene expression (resveratrol versus control diet) in neocortex by GEO2R analysis.

(DOCX)

S1 Text. Data analysis for S2 Table.

(DOCX)

S2 Text. R script provided by GEO2R analysis.

(DOCX)

S1 Fig. Network analysis using STRING and the non-curated list of differentially expressed genes in neocortex after RSV diet.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

In Memoriam: Prof. Adela Mazo, she was a brilliant Chemistry student and, later, a stunning colleague. This work was partially supported by SAF2014-51825-R from Plan Nacional de Investigación Científica” (Spanish Ministry of “Economía e Innovación”) and by grant PEII-2014-030-P from Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha, Spain. ASM was awarded a fellowship (PRE-8002/2014) from Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha, Spain.

Abbreviations

AD

Alzheimer’s disease

CNS

Central Nervous System

Crtc1

CREB-regulated transcription coactivator 1

GO

Gene Ontology

PD

Parkinson’s disease

RSV

trans-resveratrol

RT-qPCR

quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction after reverse transcription

STRING

Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was partially supported by SAF2014-51825-R from Plan Nacional de Investigación Científica” (Spanish Ministry of “Economía e Innovación”) and by grant PEII-2014-030-P from Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha, Spain. ASM was awarded a fellowship (PRE-8002/2014) from Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha, Spain.

References

  • 1.Kim GH, Kim JE, Rhie SJ, Yoon S. The Role of Oxidative Stress in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Exp Neurobiol. 2015;24: 325 doi: 10.5607/en.2015.24.4.325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Franco R, Cedazo-Minguez A. Successful therapies for Alzheimer’s disease: why so many in animal models and none in humans? Front Pharmacol. Frontiers Research Foundation; 2014;5: 146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hornykiewicz O. The discovery of dopamine deficiency in the parkinsonian brain. J Neural Transm Suppl. 2006; 9–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Prince M, Wimo A, Guerchet M, Gemma-Claire A, Wu Y-T, Prina M. World Alzheimer Report 2015: The Global Impact of Dementia—An analysis of prevalence, incidence, cost and trends. Alzheimer’s Dis Int. 2015; 84. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Takaoka M. Resveratrol, a new phenolic compound, from Veratrum grandiflorum. J Chem Soc Japan. 1939;60: 1090–1100. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Villaflores OB, Chen YJ, Chen CP, Yeh JM, Wu TY. Curcuminoids and resveratrol as anti-Alzheimer agents. Taiwan J Obs Gynecol. 2012;51: 515–525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pérez-Jiménez J, Fezeu L, Touvier M, Arnault N, Manach C, Hercberg S, et al. Dietary intake of 337 polyphenols in French adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;93: 1220–1228. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.110.007096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Reagan-Shaw S, Nihal M, Ahmad N. Dose translation from animal to human studies revisited. FASEB J. 2008;22: 659–661. doi: 10.1096/fj.07-9574LSF [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Turner RS, Thomas RG, Craft S, Van Dyck CH, Mintzer J, Reynolds BA, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of resveratrol for Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2015;85: 1383–91. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rege SD, Geetha T, Griffin GD, Broderick TL, Babu JR. Neuroprotective effects of resveratrol in Alzheimer disease pathology. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014;6: 218 doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kontush A, Finckh B, Karten B, Kohlschütter A, Beisiegel U. Antioxidant and prooxidant activity of alpha-tocopherol in human plasma and low density lipoprotein. J Lipid Res. 1996;37: 1436–48. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8827516 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bowry VW, Stocker R. Tocopherol-mediated peroxidation.The prooxidant effect of vitamin E on the radical-initiated oxidation of human low-density lipoprotein. J Am Chem Soc. 1993;115: 6029–6044. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Barger JL, Kayo T, Vann JM, Arias EB, Wang J, Hacker TA, et al. A low dose of dietary resveratrol partially mimics caloric restriction and retards aging parameters in mice. PLoS One. 2008;3: e2264 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002264 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Levitan IB, Kaczmarek LK. The Neuron: Cell and Molecular Biology. Oxford University Press; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Verkhratsky A, Butt A. Glial Neurobiology. Wiley; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Arendt T. Alzheimer’s disease as a loss of differentiation control in a subset of neurons that retain immature features in the adult brain. Neurobiol Aging. 21: 783–96. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11124422 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Foti Cuzzola V, Ciurleo R, Giacoppo S, Marino S, Bramanti P. Role of resveratrol and its analogues in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases: focus on recent discoveries. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2011;10: 849–62. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21999735 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Keil R, Schulz J, Hatzfeld M. P0071/PKP4, a multifunctional protein coordinating cell adhesion with cytoskeletal organization. Biological Chemistry. 2013. pp. 1005–1017. doi: 10.1515/hsz-2013-0114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nolze A, Schneider J, Keil R, Lederer M, Hüttelmaier S, Kessels MM, et al. FMRP regulates actin filament organization via the armadillo protein p0071. RNA. 2013;19: 1483–96. doi: 10.1261/rna.037945.112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Thomsen R, Lade Nielsen A. A Boyden chamber-based method for characterization of astrocyte protrusion localized RNA and protein. Glia. 2011;59: 1782–92. doi: 10.1002/glia.21223 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sontag JM, Fykse EM, Ushkaryov Y, Liu JP, Robinson PJ, Südhof TC. Differential expression and regulation of multiple dynamins. J Biol Chem. 1994;269: 4547–54. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8308025 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Romeu A, Arola L. Classical dynamin DNM1 and DNM3 genes attain maximum expression in the normal human central nervous system. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7: 188 doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-188 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Elferink LA, Trimble WS, Scheller RH. Two vesicle-associated membrane protein genes are differentially expressed in the rat central nervous system. J Biol Chem. 1989;264: 11061–4. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2472388 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Washbourne P, Schiavo G, Montecucco C. Vesicle-associated membrane protein-2 (synaptobrevin-2) forms a complex with synaptophysin. Biochem J. 1995; 721–4. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7848269 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Winkle CC, Hanlin CC, Gupton SL. Utilizing Combined Methodologies to Define the Role of Plasma Membrane Delivery During Axon Branching and Neuronal Morphogenesis. J Vis Exp. 2016; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ladiwala ARA, Lin JC, Bale SS, Marcelino-Cruz AM, Bhattacharya M, Dordick JS, et al. Resveratrol selectively remodels soluble oligomers and fibrils of amyloid A?? into off-pathway conformers. J Biol Chem. 2010;285: 24228–24237. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.133108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Marambaud P, Zhao H, Davies P. Resveratrol Promotes Clearance of Alzheimer’s Disease Amyloid- Peptides. J Biol Chem. 2005;280: 37377–37382. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M508246200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Savaskan E, Olivieri G, Meier F, Seifritz E, Wirz-Justice A, Müller-Spahn F. Red wine ingredient resveratrol protects from beta-amyloid neurotoxicity. Gerontology. 2003;49: 380–3. doi: 73766 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wang J, Ho L, Zhao Z, Seror I, Humala N, Dickstein DL, et al. Moderate consumption of Cabernet Sauvignon attenuates Abeta neuropathology in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. FASEB J. 2006;20: 2313–20. doi: 10.1096/fj.06-6281com [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Karuppagounder SS, Pinto JT, Xu H, Chen H- L, Beal MF, Gibson GE. Dietary supplementation with resveratrol reduces plaque pathology in a transgenic model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurochem Int. 2009;54: 111–8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2008.10.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.dos Santos AQ, Nardin P, Funchal C, de Almeida LM, Jacques-Silva MC, Wofchuk ST, Gonçalves CA GC. Resveratrol increases glutamate uptake and glutamine synthetase activity in C6 glioma cells. Arch Biochem Piophys. 2006;453: 161–167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Huang T-C, Lu K-T, Wo Y-YP, Wu Y-J, Yang Y-L. Resveratrol protects rats from Aβ-induced neurotoxicity by the reduction of iNOS expression and lipid peroxidation. PLoS One. 2011;6: e29102 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zhang F, Liu J, Shi J- S. Anti-inflammatory activities of resveratrol in the brain: role of resveratrol in microglial activation. Eur J Pharmacol. Elsevier B.V.; 2010;636: 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.03.043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lu X, Ma L, Ruan L, Kong Y, Mou H, Zhang Z, et al. Resveratrol differentially modulates inflammatory responses of microglia and astrocytes. J Neuroinflammation. 2010;7: 46 doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-7-46 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Karagiannis TC, Ververis K. Potential of chromatin modifying compounds for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Pathobiol Aging Age Relat Dis. 2012;2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Borroto-Escuela DO, Agnati LF, Bechter K, Jansson A, Tarakanov AO, Fuxe K. The role of transmitter diffusion and flow versus extracellular vesicles in volume transmission in the brain neural-glial networks. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015;370: 20140183-. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Creutz CE, Tomsig JL, Snyder SL, Gautier MC, Skouri F, Beisson J, et al. The copines, a novel class of C2 domain-containing, calcium-dependent, phospholipid-binding proteins conserved from Paramecium to humans. J Biol Chem. 1998;273: 1393–402. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9430674 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tomsig JL, Creutz CE. Copines: A ubiquitous family of Ca2+-dependent phospholipid-binding proteins. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2002. pp. 1467–1477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Salmina AB. Neuron-glia interactions as therapeutic targets in neurodegeneration. J Alzheimers Dis. 2009;16: 485–502. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2009-0988 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Barth RF, Kaur B. Rat brain tumor models in experimental neuro-oncology: the C6, 9L, T9, RG2, F98, BT4C, RT-2 and CNS-1 gliomas. J Neurooncol. 2009;94: 299–312. doi: 10.1007/s11060-009-9875-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Shen G, Shen F, Shi Z, Liu W, Hu W, Zheng X, et al. Identification of cancer stem-like cells in the C6 glioma cell line and the limitation of current identification methods. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2008;44: 280–9. doi: 10.1007/s11626-008-9115-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kitamoto T. Targeted expression of temperature-sensitive dynamin to study neural mechanisms of complex behavior in Drosophila. J Neurogenet. 2002; 205–228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Praefcke GJK, McMahon HT. The dynamin superfamily: universal membrane tubulation and fission molecules? Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004;5: 133–47. doi: 10.1038/nrm1313 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Awasaki T, Ito K. Engulfing action of glial cells is required for programmed axon pruning during Drosophila metamorphosis. Curr Biol. 2004;14: 668–677. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hebbar S, Fernandes JJ. Pruning of motor neuron branches establishes the DLM innervation pattern in Drosophila. J Neurobiol. 2004;60: 499–516. doi: 10.1002/neu.20031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sakai H, Li G, Hino Y, Moriura Y, Kawawaki J, Sawada M, et al. Increases in intracellular pH facilitate endocytosis and decrease availability of voltage-gated proton channels in osteoclasts and microglia. J Physiol. 2013;591: 5851–66. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.263558 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bito H, Takemoto-Kimura S. Ca2+/CREB/CBP-dependent gene regulation: A shared mechanism critical in long-term synaptic plasticity and neuronal survival. Cell Calcium. 2003. pp. 425–430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Liu D, Zhang Q, Gu J, Wang X, Xie K, Xian X, et al. Resveratrol prevents impaired cognition induced by chronic unpredictable mild stress in rats. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacology Biol Psychiatry. 2014;49: 21–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ferretta A, Gaballo A, Tanzarella P, Piccoli C, Capitanio N, Nico B, et al. Effect of resveratrol on mitochondrial function: Implications in parkin-associated familiar Parkinson’s disease. Biochim Biophys Acta—Mol Basis Dis. 2014;1842: 902–915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Jin F, Wu Q, Lu Y-F, Gong Q-H, Shi J-S. Neuroprotective effect of resveratrol on 6-OHDA-induced Parkinson’s disease in rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 2008;600: 78–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Khan MM, Ahmad A, Ishrat T, Khan MB, Hoda MN, Khuwaja G, et al. Resveratrol attenuates 6-hydroxydopamine-induced oxidative damage and dopamine depletion in rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Brain Res. 2010;1328: 139–151. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.02.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Lu K- T, Ko M- C, Chen B- Y, Huang J- C, Hsieh C- W, Lee M- C, et al. Neuroprotective effects of resveratrol on MPTP-induced neuron loss mediated by free radical scavenging. J Agric Food Chem. 2008;56: 6910–6913. doi: 10.1021/jf8007212 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hochberg Y, Benjamini Y. More powerful procedures for multiple significance testing. Stat Med. 1990;9: 811–8. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2218183 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Dresen IM, Husing J, Kruse E, Boes T, Jockel KH. Software packages for quantitative microarray-based gene expression analysis. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2003;4: 417–437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Szklarczyk D, Franceschini A, Wyder S, Forslund K, Heller D, Huerta-Cepas J, et al. STRING v10: protein-protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43: D447–52. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Szklarczyk D, Franceschini A, Kuhn M, Simonovic M, Roth A, Minguez P, et al. The STRING database in 2011: functional interaction networks of proteins, globally integrated and scored. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39: D561–8. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq973 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Benda P, Lightbody J, Sato G, Levine L, Sweet W. Differentiated rat glial cell strain in tissue culture. Science. 1968;161: 370–1. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4873531 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Castillo CA, Albasanz JL, Fernández M, Martín M. Endogenous expression of adenosine A1, A2 and A3 receptors in rat C6 glioma cells. Neurochem Res. 2007;32: 1056–70. doi: 10.1007/s11064-006-9273-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Michels G, Wätjen W, Weber N, Niering P, Chovolou Y, Kampkötter A, Proksch P KR. Resveratrol induces apoptotic cell death in rat H4IIE hepatoma cells but necrosis in C6 glioma cells. Toxicology. 2006;225: 173–82. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2006.05.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Quincozes-Santos A, Bobermin LD, Tramontina AC, Wartchow KM, Tagliari B, Souza DO, Wyse AT GC. Oxidative stress mediated by NMDA, AMPA/KA channels in acute hippocampal slices: neuroprotective effect of resveratrol. Toxicol Vitr. 2014;28: 544–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Giust D, Da Ros T, Martín M, Albasanz JL. Modulation of gene expression of adenosine and metabotropic glutamate receptors in rat’s neuronal cells exposed to L-glutamate and [60]fullerene. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2014;10: 1610–9. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25016660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Table. Differential gene expression (resveratrol versus control diet) in neocortex by GeneSpring analysis.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Differential gene expression (resveratrol versus control diet) in neocortex by GEO2R analysis.

(DOCX)

S1 Text. Data analysis for S2 Table.

(DOCX)

S2 Text. R script provided by GEO2R analysis.

(DOCX)

S1 Fig. Network analysis using STRING and the non-curated list of differentially expressed genes in neocortex after RSV diet.

(DOCX)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES