ABSTRACT
Exported proteins of bacterial pathogens function both in essential physiological processes and in virulence. Past efforts to identify exported proteins were limited by the use of bacteria growing under laboratory (in vitro) conditions. Thus, exported proteins that are exported only or preferentially in the context of infection may be overlooked. To solve this problem, we developed a genome-wide method, named EXIT (exported in vivo technology), to identify proteins that are exported by bacteria during infection and applied it to Mycobacterium tuberculosis during murine infection. Our studies validate the power of EXIT to identify proteins exported during infection on an unprecedented scale (593 proteins) and to reveal in vivo induced exported proteins (i.e., proteins exported significantly more during in vivo infection than in vitro). Our EXIT data also provide an unmatched resource for mapping the topology of M. tuberculosis membrane proteins. As a new approach for identifying exported proteins, EXIT has potential applicability to other pathogens and experimental conditions.
KEYWORDS: beta-lactamase reporter, EXIT, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, in vivo, membrane proteins, protein export, protein secretion, virulence
IMPORTANCE
There is long-standing interest in identifying exported proteins of bacteria as they play critical roles in physiology and virulence and are commonly immunogenic antigens and targets of antibiotics. While significant effort has been made to identify the bacterial proteins that are exported beyond the cytoplasm to the membrane, cell wall, or host environment, current methods to identify exported proteins are limited by their use of bacteria growing under laboratory (in vitro) conditions. Because in vitro conditions do not mimic the complexity of the host environment, critical exported proteins that are preferentially exported in the context of infection may be overlooked. We developed a novel method to identify proteins that are exported by bacteria during host infection and applied it to identify Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteins exported in a mouse model of tuberculosis.
INTRODUCTION
The bacterial exportome is the subset of proteins that are exported beyond the cytoplasm to the cytoplasmic membrane or the cell wall (CW) or are released (secreted) into the environment. There is long-standing interest in identifying exported proteins of bacteria as they play critical roles in physiology and virulence and are commonly immunogenic antigens and targets of antibiotics (1, 2). However, current approaches to identify exported proteins have limitations. Bioinformatic predictions of exported proteins are complicated by disagreement between prediction algorithms, which makes experimental validation critical. Mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics suffers from the intrinsic difficulty of isolating pure subcellular fractions, which can result in identification of contaminating proteins as false positives (3, 4). Genetic reporters (e.g., PhoA) of export nearly always require phenotypic screening of in-frame fusion proteins on a colony-by-colony basis, which limits the number of proteins identified, even in the most ambitious efforts (5–7). A further significant limitation of current methods is their use of bacteria grown in laboratory media (in vitro), which fails to recapitulate the complexity of the host environment (4). Thus, proteins that are preferentially or exclusively exported during infection are overlooked (8). The significance of studying pathogens in the context of the host is borne out by methods such as IVET (in vivo expression technology), STM (signature tagged mutagenesis), and TraSH (transposon site hybridization), which reveal virulence mechanisms overlooked by in vitro-based studies (9). Here, we report a novel genome-wide method that we refer to as EXIT (exported in vivo technology) that identifies proteins exported by a bacterial pathogen during in vivo infection.
EXIT utilizes the ‘BlaTEM β-lactamase reporter of export (10). Because ‘BlaTEM lacks its native signal peptide for export, it is exported only to the extracytoplasmic space when fused in-frame to an export signal (i.e., signal peptide or transmembrane domain). When exported, ‘BlaTEM cleaves β-lactams and confers β-lactam resistance to bacteria (10). Importantly, ‘BlaTEM is a selectable reporter and bacteria exporting ‘BlaTEM can be collected by virtue of their ability to survive β-lactam treatment. ‘BlaTEM reporter fusions can identify cell wall and fully secreted proteins, as well as exported domains of integral membrane proteins (10, 11) (Fig. 1a).
Here, we used EXIT to identify ‘BlaTEM fusions to proteins that are exported by the pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis during infection of β-lactam-treated mice. By combining a comprehensive library of in-frame ‘BlaTEM fusions with the ability to select bacteria exporting fusion proteins in vivo and next-generation sequencing en masse of the recovered fusions, EXIT identified 593 proteins as exported by M. tuberculosis during infection. This list of EXIT proteins is significant in demonstrating in vivo export for 54% of the 1,040 M. tuberculosis open reading frames (ORFs) computationally predicted to be exported (see Materials and Methods). Moreover, for 100 proteins, EXIT provided the first experimental evidence for their export. EXIT also identified 32 proteins lacking in silico predicted export signals, which speaks to the unbiased nature of the approach. For the 337 integral membrane proteins identified, the sites of exported fusions are significant in providing protein topology information, which is notoriously difficult to predict computationally (12) but critical for membrane protein studies. Finally, 38 of the proteins identified were in vivo induced exported proteins (i.e., proteins exported significantly more during in vivo infection than in vitro). We showed that M. tuberculosis mutants defective in four of these proteins, all of unknown function, have intracellular growth defects in macrophages. Our studies validate the power of EXIT to identify proteins exported during infection, to reveal new virulence factors, and to provide valuable resources for functional studies of uncharacterized proteins.
RESULTS
EXIT involves four steps (Fig. 1b; see Materials and Methods for details). In step 1, a comprehensive library of plasmids carrying random fragments of M. tuberculosis genomic DNA cloned in front of ‘blaTEM was constructed. On average, the M. tuberculosis EXIT library contained a fusion junction every 26 bp in the genome and each gene was represented by 16 in-frame fusions. Because M. tuberculosis has an endogenous β-lactamase BlaC (13), the EXIT library was constructed in a M. tuberculosis ΔblaC mutant to enable selection for β-lactam-resistant fusions. In step 2, mice were infected with the pooled EXIT library and, starting 1 day after infection, treated with β-lactam antibiotics to select for M. tuberculosis exporting ‘BlaTEM fusion proteins in vivo. The efficacy of the β-lactam treatment in selecting strains expressing exported ‘BlaTEM fusions from a mixed population was initially confirmed in proof-of-principle experiments (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). After 2 weeks of treatment, mice were sacrificed, and spleens and lungs were harvested. In step 3, organ homogenates were plated on 7H10 agar to recover M. tuberculosis clones that survived β-lactam treatment during infection. In step 4, library plasmids were isolated from the bacteria that survived in vivo β-lactam treatment, as well as from the input library, and the fusion junctions were sequenced using next-generation sequencing. A pipeline was built to analyze the sequencing data, and the abundance of individual fusions was determined by read count. Using statistical modeling, highly abundant fusions recovered from the mice following in vivo β-lactam treatment were identified.
EXIT in M. tuberculosis-infected mice.
EXIT experiments were performed in duplicate on two independent occasions, with the results from each experiment being highly correlated (Fig. S2A to C). As done before in genome-wide screens of M. tuberculosis in vivo (14–16), in order to achieve maximal library representation we infected mice with the EXIT library using intravenous (i.v.) injection (~106 CFU), which resulted in higher seeding of spleens versus lungs. Unless noted otherwise, the results described are from the more comprehensive spleen data set. On the basis of proof-of-principle experiments (Fig. S1), M. tuberculosis clones expressing in-frame ‘BlaTEM fusions to ORFs of exported proteins were expected to survive and replicate during in vivo β-lactam treatment and to be more abundant (assessed by sequenced read count) than strains not exporting the reporter in the output from treated mice. A Gaussian mixture model was constructed to describe the data as two populations of low-abundance and high-abundance genes (Fig. 2a). Using this statistical model, 593 genes were identified as highly abundant (in both of the replicate experiments) in the recovered population after in vivo β-lactam treatment and were thus predicted to encode exported proteins (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). For 82% of these 593 proteins, multiple unique fusion sites were enriched after passage through β-lactam-treated mice, providing confidence in the list of proteins identified as exported in vivo (Fig. 2b; Table S1). Note that there is no promoter sequence upstream of the reporter on the EXIT plasmid backbone (pDW31); therefore, an active ‘BlaTEM fusion requires in-frame fusion to a gene encoding an exported protein that is expressed from its native promoter.
Validation of EXIT-identified proteins.
We assessed the accuracy of EXIT to select for in vivo exported proteins by searching for in silico predicted export signals (signal peptides and transmembrane domains) in the proteins identified (Fig. 2c). A total of 95% of the 593 proteins had export signals compared to only 26% of in-frame fusions in the input library. EXIT proteins with predicted Sec signal peptides, Tat signal peptides, lipoprotein signal peptides, and transmembrane domains were identified (Table S1). We also compared the proteins in the EXIT list to proteins previously demonstrated to be exported by in vitro-grown bacteria using MS-based subcellular proteomics or genetic reporters of export (Table S1). A total of 83% of EXIT proteins were previously identified as exported, providing further validation. For the remaining 17% (100 proteins), the identification by EXIT is significant in providing the first experimental evidence of their export.
EXIT proteins lacking conventional signals for export.
A small number of EXIT proteins (32 proteins) lack predicted signal peptides or transmembrane domains. These proteins are candidates for being nonconventional exported proteins or for being overlooked by the in silico algorithms used (see Materials and Methods) (Fig. 2c) (Table S2). To validate proteins on this list of unpredicted exported proteins, we used the hsp60 promoter to constitutively express three of these proteins (Rv1728c, Rv3707c, and Rv3811) with a C-terminal hemagglutinin (HA) tag in M. tuberculosis. Subcellular fractions (cell wall, membrane, and soluble cytoplasm) prepared from these strains were then used to localize these proteins by immunoblotting. All three proteins were exported to the cell wall (CW) of M. tuberculosis (Fig. 3). These results confirm the ability of EXIT to identify exported proteins that are missed by heavily relied upon in silico prediction tools.
EXIT fusions in the lungs.
As a consequence of low seeding of M. tuberculosis to the lungs following i.v. injection (17), we were unable to develop a formal statistical model to analyze the lung data. However, using a threshold cutoff of 3.5-fold enrichment of a gene in the lungs in both experimental replicates versus the input abundance (a threshold which agreed with the statistically defined threshold determined in the spleens), we identified 282 proteins as strong candidates for being exported in the lungs (Table S1). Of these, 274 (97%) were also on the list of 593 EXIT proteins exported in the spleen (Table S1). We predict that bottleneck effects prevented us from identifying a higher proportion of the 593 proteins as being exported in the lungs.
Eight proteins predicted to be exported in the lung, but not identified by EXIT as exported in the spleen, represent a potentially interesting group of proteins that may be regulated by the lung environment in either expression or export (Table S3). Four of these proteins are PE_PGRS proteins, a poorly understood class of repeat-containing proteins unique to mycobacteria (18). One of these proteins is PE_PGRS33, which contributes to M. tuberculosis entry into macrophages (19) and may additionally modulate the host cytokine response (18, 20). However, further studies will be required to confirm that these eight proteins are lung specific.
EXIT-exported fusions provide topology information for membrane proteins.
Because ‘BlaTEM must be positioned in the extracytoplasmic space to produce β-lactam resistance, the behavior of individual EXIT fusions provides topological information. In the 593 EXIT proteins, there were 2,516 fusion sites that were enriched during β-lactam treatment (from a total of 10,711 in-frame fusions for these proteins in the input) (Table S1; Table S4). To validate the use of EXIT for topology mapping, we investigated fusion sites in the MmpL3 transporter protein. All 13 of the MmpL3 EXIT fusions enriched during β-lactam treatment in vivo mapped to two large domains, indicating an extracytoplasmic location, while other fusions in the input library, including many that mapped to the C-terminus, were not enriched (Table S1; Table S4). These data align with the TopPred (21) prediction of 12 transmembrane helices with two large extracytoplasmic domains and a cytoplasmic C-terminus for MmpL3 (Fig. 4), and they agree with results of recent MmpL3 structure and topology studies (22). Given that multiple topology models have been published for MmpL3 (23–32) (Fig. S3), this analysis is significant in demonstrating the ability of EXIT to distinguish between discordant models. Among 10 other MmpL proteins identified, there were 52 enriched EXIT fusion sites that mapped similarly to two large domains, suggesting that these extracytoplasmic domains are a conserved feature of MmpL transporters (Table S1; Table S4).
Identification of in vivo induced exported proteins.
EXIT provides an opportunity to identify M. tuberculosis proteins that are exported more during in vivo infection than during in vitro growth. Such proteins, which we refer to as in vivo induced exported proteins, could result from transcriptional/posttranscriptional induction in vivo or from in vivo upregulation of the responsible protein export system. In either case, the in vivo regulation is suggestive of important functions during infection. To identify in vivo induced exported proteins, the EXIT bacteria surviving β-lactam treatment in mice were plated in parallel on 7H10 agar and 7H10 agar containing β-lactam (Fig. 5a). The clones recovered on regular agar represent the fusion proteins exported during infection (i.e., the 593 in vivo exported proteins discussed above). Clones recovered on β-lactam agar express fusions that are additionally expressed and exported under in vitro conditions. There was high correlation in the abundances of individual EXIT fusions recovered from 7H10 agar with and without β-lactam, indicating that the majority of EXIT proteins were exported similarly in vivo and under these in vitro conditions (Fig. S2D). To identify proteins that are exported significantly more in vivo than in vitro, genes with significantly lower recovery from β-lactam agar (in vitro plus in vivo) versus regular agar (in vivo) were identified, a multiple-comparison correction was applied, and the false-discovery rate (FDR) was set at 5% (see Materials and Methods). In this way, 38 of the 593 EXIT proteins were identified as in vivo induced exported proteins (Table 1) (Fig. 5b). Of the 38 in vivo induced exported proteins, 14 were previously shown to be transcriptionally upregulated during infection, which helps validate this approach (Table 1). Proteins with functions in regulation (SenX3, PknH), host defense (MmcO, Rv3654c), and cell wall lipid transport (DrrC, MmpL8) were among those identified. However, the largest category of in vivo induced exported proteins (19 of 38 proteins) consisted of proteins of unknown function. Another notable category of in vivo induced exported proteins consists of proteins lacking in silico predicted export signals. Eight of the 38 in vivo induced exported proteins identified by EXIT lack predicted export signals, including Rv3707c, which we confirmed to have been exported to the cell wall (Fig. 3).
TABLE 1 .
ORF no. | Gene name(s) | Predicted or proven function | In silico export signala | Predicted or proven essential in vitro or during infection | Transcriptional upregulation in vivo | q value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rv0011c | Cell division | TM | 0.000 | |||
Rv0261c | narK3 | Nitrite extrusion protein | TM | 0.003 | ||
Rv0490 | senX3 | Two-component sensor histidine kinase | TM | In mice (14, 78, 79) | 0.028 | |
Rv0506 | mmpS2 | Unknown | SP, TM | 0.007 | ||
Rv0559c | Unknown | SP | 0.008 | |||
Rv0593 | lprL, mce2E | Mce family lipoprotein | Lipo, TM | In mice (80) | 0.006 | |
Rv0615 | Unknown | TM | 0.017 | |||
Rv0713 | Unknown | TM | 0.001 | |||
Rv0817c | Unknown | SP, TM | In vitro (81) | 0.005 | ||
Rv0846c | mmcO | Multicopper oxidase | SP, Tat SP, Lipo | 0.000 | ||
Rv0892 | Probable monooxygenase | TM | In macrophages (82) | 0.008 | ||
Rv1026 | ppx-2 | Polyphosphatase | In vitro (81), in mice (83) | 0.022 | ||
Rv1145 | mmpL13a | Unknown | TM | 0.000 | ||
Rv1266c | pknH | Serine/threonine-protein kinase | TM | In mice (84) | 0.029 | |
Rv1508c | Unknown | TM | In mice (85) | 0.007 | ||
Rv1517 | Unknown | Tat SP, TM | 0.015 | |||
Rv1639c | Unknown | TM | 0.007 | |||
Rv1737c | narK2 | Possible nitrate-nitrite transporter | TM | In mice (15) | In macrophages (82) | 0.000 |
Rv1739c | Sulfate transporter | TM | In macrophages (82) | 0.043 | ||
Rv1965 | yrbE3B | Permease component of Mce system | TM | In macaques (86), in mice (87, 88) | In macrophages (82) | 0.001 |
Rv1969 | mce3D | Mce family protein | SP, TM | In mice (87, 88) | 0.006 | |
Rv2138 | lppL | Probable conserved lipoprotein | SP, Lipo, TM | In mice (15), in vitro (81) | 0.006 | |
Rv2144c | Unknown | TM | In mice (85) | 0.001 | ||
Rv2273 | Unknown | TM | In macrophages (89) | 0.000 | ||
Rv2284 | lipM | Probable esterase | TM | In mice (90) | 0.024 | |
Rv2330c | lppP | Probable lipoprotein | SP, Lipo, TM | In macrophages (91) | In macrophages (82) | 0.007 |
Rv2380c | mbtE | Mycobactin synthesis | In mice (15), in vitro (81) | In macrophages (82) | 0.007 | |
Rv2536 | Unknown | TM | In mice (15) | 0.017 | ||
Rv2938 | drrC | Phthiocerol dimycocerosate transport | TM | In mice (15) | 0.017 | |
Rv3343c | PPE54 | PPE family protein | In vitro (81) | In humans (92) | 0.006 | |
Rv3478 | PPE60, mtb39c | PE family protein | 0.017 | |||
Rv3526 | kshA | Oxygenase component of 3-ketosteroid-9-alpha-hydroxylase | In mice (93) | In macrophages (82) | 0.005 | |
Rv3554 | fdxB | Possible electron transfer | TM | 0.001 | ||
Rv3596c | clpC1 | ATP-dependent protease ATP-binding subunit | In macrophages (57, 91), in vitro (81) | 0.006 | ||
Rv3654c | Unknown | In macrophages (34) | In humans (92) | 0.000 | ||
Rv3701c | Ergothioneine biosynthesis | In macrophages (91), in mice (14) | 0.039 | |||
Rv3707c | Unknown | 0.039 | ||||
Rv3823c | mmpL8 | Sulfolipid-1 (SL-1) transporter | TM | In mice (15), in vitro (81) | 0.027 |
Lipo, lipoprotein signal peptide; SP, Sec signal peptide; Tat, Tat signal peptide; TM, transmembrane domain.
In vivo induced exported proteins contribute to M. tuberculosis virulence.
Given the precedent for upregulation of virulence factors in the host (8), we predicted that the list of in vivo induced exported proteins would include proteins with roles in pathogenesis. In fact, 13 of the exported proteins on the list of those induced in vivo have demonstrated or predicted roles (based on TraSH/transposon sequencing [Tnseq] studies) in virulence (Table 1). To explore this possibility further, we obtained six M. tuberculosis mutants with transposon insertions in genes encoding in vivo exported proteins from the Biodefense and Emerging Infections Research Resources Repository (BEI Resources) (33) and tested them for intracellular growth in murine bone marrow macrophages. Intracellular growth of each mutant was compared to that of the parental M. tuberculosis CDC1551 strain by plating bacilli from macrophage lysates over time. Mutants carrying transposon insertions in lipM and narK3 had no intracellular growth defect in macrophages (Fig. 5d). However, four mutants carrying transposon insertions in genes encoding in vivo induced exported proteins of unknown function (rv3707c, rv1508c, rv0559c, and rv2536) demonstrated significant defects in intracellular growth compared to the parental strain (Fig. 5c). None of these mutants exhibited a general growth defect during growth in culture (in vitro) (data not shown). This mutant analysis demonstrates how the functional genomics information provided by EXIT can be harnessed to reveal uncharacterized virulence factors.
DISCUSSION
EXIT is a method for discovering bacterial proteins exported during in vivo infection. In applying this approach to M. tuberculosis, we identified an unprecedented total of 593 in vivo exported proteins and additionally identified in vivo induced exported proteins that include uncharacterized virulence factors. Moreover, the total number of EXIT proteins identified surpassed the number of exported proteins identified in past discovery efforts using genetic reporters with in vitro-grown bacteria (5–7, 11). EXIT increased the number of experimentally demonstrated M. tuberculosis exported proteins by 100, including examples lacking in silico predicted export signals, and it provided a database of enriched fusion sites for mapping protein topology. The broad effectiveness of EXIT can be attributed to the following factors: (i) the highly comprehensive library (99% of the genome represented with at least one in-frame fusion); (ii) the use of the ‘BlaTEM reporter as a selectable marker in vivo; and (iii) the use of next-generation sequencing and statistical analysis to identify exported fusions.
EXIT identified 32 proteins that lack export signals, with 8 being in vivo induced exported proteins. Although it remains possible that some of the EXIT protein identifications represent false positives, our validation of three of these proteins as exported (Fig. 3) argues for other proteins on this list being true exported proteins. EXIT identification of proteins lacking standard export signals may reflect the limitations of in silico algorithms or reflect the fact that these proteins are exported by unconventional pathways. For example, the in vivo induced exported Rv3654c protein lacks an obvious export signal but was previously suggested to be secreted during infection, on the basis of detection of Rv3654c in macrophage lysates (34). Our EXIT results provide important confirmation of Rv3654c being exported in vivo. Further, the rv3654c gene is located near genes for potential tight adherence (Tad) secretion system components (34), which could be responsible for Rv3654c export.
EXIT identified all types of exported proteins: cytoplasmic membrane proteins (e.g., MmpL3 [22], OmamA [35]), cell wall proteins (e.g., FbpA [36, 37], HbhA [38]), mycobacterial outer membrane proteins (e.g., OmpA [39], SpmT [40]), and fully secreted/extracellular proteins (SapM [41], Mpt63 [42]) (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). However, the small secreted ESAT-6/CFP-10-like proteins that are secreted by specialized ESX/type VII secretion systems (43), and SodA and PknG, which require the SecA2-dependent system for export, were not identified by EXIT (44–46), despite the presence of in-frame fusions in the input library. For any genetic reporter of export, some proteins may be missed due to incompatibility with specialized export systems; for example, ESAT-6/CFP-10 proteins are secreted as a dimer (43) and one possibility is that ‘BlaTEM fusions could disrupt ESAT-6/CFP-10 interactions. In addition, proteins may be missed due to the level of expression required for a positive export signal (β-lactam resistance), toxicity, or instability of certain fusion proteins. One of these factors is the likely explanation for the fact that no ESAT-6/CFP-10, SodA, or PknG proteins were identified by the ‘BlaTEM reporter in EXIT or in our past studies (11). Note that a study reporting the use of the ‘BlaTEM reporter with ESAT-6/CFP-10 secreted proteins was retracted (47, 48). However, EXIT was successful in identifying other examples of SecA2-dependent proteins (solute binding proteins and Mce proteins [45]), and it identified 10 PE, PPE, and PE_PGRS proteins representing another protein family exported by ESX/type VII secretion systems (49, 50). The YxxxD/E motif that exists in proteins exported by ESX/type VII secretion systems is present in 6 of the 10 EXIT-identified PE, PPE, and PE_PGRS proteins, although some of these proteins additionally have in silico predicted Sec signal peptides (Table S1; Table S3), which makes their route of export more difficult to predict.
As an unbiased genome-wide approach, EXIT has the potential to reveal unannotated/misannotated proteins. Along these lines, EXIT identified multiple enriched fusions in the same reading frame in six unannotated intragenic regions of the genome. We hypothesize that these fusions map to unannotated ORFs (Table S5). For example, a candidate unannotated ORF with a Sec signal peptide is in the region between Rv2304c and Rv2305 (labeled as downstream of Rv2307c). Future studies are warranted to confirm the existence of these putative proteins.
Although protein topology is critical information for understanding membrane protein function, limited experimental topology data exist on a genome-wide level and the in silico prediction algorithms used to design experiments often disagree (12). EXIT proved valuable in discriminating between topology predictions for MmpL3, a protein of interest for its essentiality in M. tuberculosis and its association with resistance mutations to several TB drug candidates (25–27, 32). We similarly investigated EXIT fusions to Rv1002c, which O-mannosylates exported proteins and contributes to virulence (51, 52). As with MmpL3, different prediction programs generate discordant models for Rv1002c (see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material). In this case, of the five models consulted, the HMMTOP prediction (53) was the best match as it positioned the enriched EXIT fusions in two extracytoplasmic domains and the C-terminus (Fig. 4; Fig. S3); this model was also the most similar to the topology of the homologous yeast O-mannosyltransferase (54). It should be noted that our analysis did not identify any one prediction program as being better than others overall, including TMHMM (55) which is used on Tuberculist (56); rather, it emphasized the value of the EXIT data to select the best model. For each of the 593 EXIT proteins, the site of enriched fusions to the reporter as well as all the in-frame EXIT fusions in the input library are provided (Table S1; Table S4). The list of total fusions will be useful for identifying nonenriched fusions to predict cytoplasmic domains. However, there are alternate explanations besides a cytoplasmic location for unenriched ‘BlaTEM fusions (e.g., unstable fusion proteins). To definitively assign cytoplasmic domains will require testing fusions to cytoplasmic reporters of protein topology.
For the 38 proteins identified as in vivo induced exported proteins (Table 1), the combination of an exported location and host regulation makes them compelling candidates for being virulence factors. Using bone marrow macrophages, we showed that mutants of four of the in vivo induced exported proteins of unknown function (Rv0559c, Rv1508c, Rv2536, and Rv3707c) are defective for intracellular growth in macrophages. For Rv0559c and Rv1508c, this is the first indication that they function in M. tuberculosis virulence. For Rv2536, the protein is predicted by Tnseq to play a role during murine infection (15); however, our data are the first to suggest a specific role promoting M. tuberculosis growth in macrophages. Lastly, while the Rv3707c homolog in Mycobacterium bovis BCG is known to promote growth in macrophages (57), the protein remains unstudied in M. tuberculosis. The specific functions of all four of these in vivo induced proteins in macrophages remain a mystery and warrant further study. Future studies should explore the other in vivo induced exported proteins for potential virulence functions.
The list of in vivo induced exported proteins also sheds light on conditions encountered during infection that are not recapitulated during in vitro growth. For example, the identification of SenX3, a sensor histidine kinase of the SenX3-RegX3 two-component system that responds to low phosphate levels (58, 59), suggests that M. tuberculosis encounters phosphate-limiting conditions during murine infection. The identification of MmcO, a multicopper oxidase that protects against copper toxicity (60, 61), is consistent with M. tuberculosis experiencing a high-copper environment during infection (62).
Past efforts to identify bacterial proteins exported during infection focused on direct testing of preselected proteins for secretion into cultured cells through microscopy or subcellular fractionation (63–65). In comparison, EXIT provides a tool for large-scale discovery of in vivo exported proteins. A recent MS-based proteomics approach for identifying labeled bacterial proteins secreted into cultured cells holds promise as a potential alternate discovery strategy (66). However, as with other proteomics studies of secreted proteins, a challenge facing this new methodology is that of avoiding identification of cytoplasmic proteins released by unintended bacterial lysis (67).
In summary, here we introduce EXIT as an effective and robust method to identify bacterial proteins exported in a whole-animal model of infection. For the M. tuberculosis research community, the data generated during the course of this work represent a valuable functional genomics resource for assigning function to uncharacterized proteins. For the larger microbiology community, EXIT provides a method that could be adapted to other bacterial pathogens. This study focused on application of EXIT during acute murine infection with M. tuberculosis. However, the ‘BlaTEM reporter and EXIT methodology are theoretically compatible with any bacterium that is either naturally β-lactam sensitive or can be made so genetically. In the future, EXIT could be used to study the in vivo exportome of other pathogens or different stages of infection.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains and growth.
Bacterial strains and plasmids are listed in Table S6 in the supplemental material. M. tuberculosis strains were grown with Middlebrook 7H9 broth or 7H10 agar (Difco) supplemented with 1× albumin dextrose saline (ADS), 0.5% glycerol, and 0.05% Tween 80 (7AGT) (68). As needed, growth medium was supplemented with 20 µg/ml kanamycin (Acros), 50 µg/ml hygromycin (Roche), or 50 µg/ml carbenicillin (Sigma). Escherichia coli strains were grown on Luria-Bertani medium (Fisher) supplemented as necessary with 40 μg/ml kanamycin, 150 μg/ml hygromycin, and 100 μg/ml carbenicillin.
EXIT library construction.
M. tuberculosis genomic DNA (gDNA) was prepared as previously described (69) from the M. tuberculosis ΔblaC mutant, named PM638 (13). Genomic DNA fragments between 500 bp and 5 kb in size were generated by partial digestion with AciI and HpaII and cloned into the multicopy, hygromycin-marked, EXIT library plasmid pDW31 (see Text S1 in the supplemental material for pDW31 construction) using the unique ClaI site located immediately upstream of the ‘blaTEM reporter. Ligated plasmids were transformed into MegaX DH10 electrocompetent cells (Invitrogen). E. coli transformants (5.6 × 106) were pooled, and plasmids were isolated using a QiaFilter Plasmid Giga kit (Qiagen). Plasmids isolated from E. coli were next transformed into PM638, M. tuberculosis H37Rv ΔblaC (13), as previously described (68). M. tuberculosis transformants (5.4 × 106) from 50 transformations were pooled to produce the input EXIT library used to infect mice. The input library was subjected to next-generation sequencing using a primer at the fusion junction to ‘blaTEM (Table S6, primers). On average, the library contained a fusion every 26 bp in the M. tuberculosis genome, with the largest nonrepresented region of the genome being only 110 nucleotides long. The complexity of the library was such that each gene was represented by an average of 16 in-frame fusions, and some genes contained more than 35 in-frame fusions. A total of 99% of the genes in the M. tuberculosis genome were represented by at least one in-frame fusion.
Mouse infection with the EXIT library.
For each experiment, 8-to-10-week-old female BALB/c mice were intravenously infected, as previously described (44), with 3 × 106 M. tuberculosis bacteria from the EXIT library, of which approximately 20% seeded the spleen and 1% seeded the lungs (data not shown), consistent with previous studies (17). For each experiment, 30 mice were infected. At 1 day after infection, organs from six mice were harvested to determine the initial dose and organ burden. At 1 day after infection, the remaining 24 mice began receiving treatment twice daily by oral gavage with 40 mg amoxicillin (MP Biomedicals 190145 or Sigma A8523) and 8 mg probenecid (Sigma P8761) administered in 0.25 M NaOH–phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Probenecid, a synergistic drug, is used in conjunction with amoxicillin to reduce drug efflux in the kidneys, increasing the serum concentration (70). The use of 24 animals per experiment was based on calculations performed to achieve a 99.5% probability that any individual clone in the EXIT library would establish infection in the spleen of at least one mouse in each replicate experiment (by calculations using the binomial equation 1 − P = [Q]n, where n represents the number of mice, Q represents the probability of failure in each individual mouse, and P represents the probability of overall success). At 14 days postinfection, mice were euthanized, and spleens and lungs were harvested to collect surviving bacteria. Organ homogenates were plated undiluted onto 7H10 agar. These recovered fusions were used to identify in vivo exported proteins. For determining fusions exported both in vivo and in vitro, organ homogenates were plated in parallel onto 7H10 agar containing carbenicillin (a β-lactam). Plates were incubated at 37°C for 3 weeks, after which colonies were pooled for plasmid DNA isolation (see Text S1). All mice were maintained under specific-pathogen-free conditions in a biosafety level 3 (BSL-3) facility. Mice were assigned randomly to experimental groups, and the mouse studies were not performed in a blind fashion. All procedures involving the use of animals were in compliance with protocols approved by the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and Biosafety Committee.
Next-generation sequencing, data analysis, and statistical modeling (see Text S1 for additional details).
Sample preparation and sequencing strategies for the ‘blaTEM fusion junction that includes upstream M. tuberculosis genomic DNA are provided in Text S1. Samples were sequenced using next-generation sequencing (Illumina HiSeq), generating paired-end multiplexed sequencing reads. To identify fusion sites, reads were trimmed of adapter sequences and aligned to the H37Rv genome. For statistical analysis, unique reads for each fusion site were counted using read counts that were first normalized to the total number of sequenced reads in each sample as follows. (i) To identify proteins exported in vivo, fusions recovered on standard 7H10 agar from β-lactam-treated mice (in vivo) were subjected to statistical analysis. The most abundant fusion position within each annotated gene was identified individually within the output for each of the two EXIT experiments. The lower of these two numbers from comparisons between replicates was used as the abundance value for the gene to require that any identified gene was highly abundant in both samples. Log10 values were used to generate a histogram, which was bimodal. A Gaussian mixture model was then used to identify the mean and variance for each population and to determine the probability that a fusion was in the higher-abundance or lower-abundance population (Fig. 2a). The abundance levels in the unselected input library were relatively uniform; thus, computation of enrichment ratios was not required and the statistical analysis was done on the distribution of abundances. (ii) To identify the in vivo induced exported proteins, fusions recovered on β-lactam-containing agar (in vitro) were subjected to statistical analysis and, in this case, the higher abundance value from comparisons between replicates was used as a representative abundance value for the gene, to identify the most stringent list of proteins that were not exported in vitro in either experiment. The log10 value of the ratio between the abundance seen following in vivo treatment and that seen following in vivo plus in vitro treatment was calculated. The top and bottom 5% were trimmed for robustness. These data fit a normal unimodal distribution, where genes of interest had high ratios of in vivo reads versus in vivo plus in vitro reads. A normal fit distribution was used to identify outliers, with higher ratios than would be predicted by chance. The Benjamini-Hochberg procedure was used to correct for multiple comparisons and identified genes with a P value of <0.0005 (false-discovery rate, <0.05). Corrected P values (q values) are reported (Table 1). (iii) To identify all individual enriched fusion junctions in an ORF for topology determination, the number of reads for each fusion site in the output from β-lactam-treated mice was divided by the number of sequenced reads in the corresponding input for each experiment. Log10 enrichment values were used to generate histograms, which produced a unimodal distribution with a right shoulder of enriched sites. A Gaussian mixture model was fitted to the distribution using Mclust in R (71). The resulting mixture models had two peaks, one representing the majority of the sites and a second, smaller peak representing points in the right shoulder representing the enriched fusions. Fusion sites that were statistically enriched in both experiments were considered to be exported.
Subcellular fractionation and immunoblotting.
M. tuberculosis cells were pelleted by centrifugation, sterilized by irradiation (JL Shepherd Mark I-137Cs irradiator), and removed from BSL-3 containment. Subcellular fractionation was performed by differential ultracentrifugation as previously described (35), generating clarified whole-cell lysates (WCL) and cell wall (CW), membrane (MEM), and soluble cytoplasmic (SOL) fractions. Fractions from equivalent original cell material were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Proteins were detected using the primary anti-HA antibody (Covance) (1:25,000), anti-SigA antibody (a gift from Murty Madiraju [72]) (1:20,000), 19kd (a gift from Douglas Young, Imperial College London, United Kingdom) (1:20,000), and HbhA (BEI Resources [38]) (1:5,000) and secondary anti-mouse- and anti-rabbit-conjugated horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (Bio-Rad). HRP signal was detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (PerkinElmer).
Identification of export signals.
Sequences were analyzed for transmembrane domains and signal peptides using TMHMM (55) and Signal P (73). Previous analyses of the M. tuberculosis genome performed with LipoP, TatP, TATFIND, and TigrFAM were used to identify proteins with lipoprotein or Tat signal peptides (74, 75). PE/PPE proteins were analyzed for YxxxD/E motifs (49).
Macrophage infections.
The following reagents were obtained through BEI Resources, NIAID, NIH: Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain CDC1551 transposon mutants (33) (Table S6). M. tuberculosis mutants were validated by PCR and Southern blotting (data not shown). Bone marrow-derived macrophages were isolated utilizing C57BL/6 mice as described previously (76). The macrophages were infected with M. tuberculosis strains at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1 for 4 h. After infection, the macrophages were washed three times to remove extracellular bacteria. At time points postinfection, the macrophages were lysed using 1% Triton X-100 (Sigma), and the lysates were diluted and plated for CFU determinations on 7H10 (Difco) or 7H11 (Sigma) plates supplemented with 0.05% Tween 80, 0.5% glycerol, 1× albumin dextrose saline (ADS), and 20 µg/ml kanamycin (Acros).
Data availability.
Raw sequencing data will be made available upon request.
Code availability.
The code developed for analyzing the sequencing data will be available through GitHub (http://github.com/gomezlab/exit), a publicly available repository, under an open source license.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Scott Deaton for assistance with statistical analyses, Marcia Sanders and the UNC Vironomics Core for assistance in sequencing for pilot studies, and Ellen Young for support in the animal experiments. We thank Bill Goldman, Inna Krieger, Dirk Dittmer, Chris Ford, and Sarah Fortune for helpful discussions. We thank Murty Madiraju for providing the SigA antibody, Douglas Young for providing the 19-kDa antibody, and Gyanu Lamichhane and BEI Resources for transposon mutants of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain CDC1551. The following reagent was obtained through the NIH Biodefense and Emerging Infections Research Resources Repository, NIAID, NIH: monoclonal anti-Mycobacterium tuberculosis HbhA (gene Rv0475), clone α-HbhA (produced in vitro) (NR-13804).
This work was supported by a Burroughs Wellcome Investigator in Pathogenesis of Infectious Disease award and NIH grants R01AI054540 and AI070928 (to M.B.) and the Welch Foundation (grant no. A-0015 to J.C.S.). E.F.P. was supported by a University of North Carolina Dissertation Completion Fellowship.
E.F.P. and M.B. designed experiments and wrote the manuscript. E.F.P. conducted all experiments except where noted below. D.W. constructed pDW31 and assisted with construction of the library. J.D.H. assisted in transformation of the EXIT library into M. tuberculosis and with murine experiments performed with the EXIT library. J.C.S. and T.R.I. carried out Illumina sequencing, and T.R.I. performed statistical analysis of the EXIT data set. D.O. and S.M.G. built the pipeline for analysis of the sequencing data. K.E.Z. performed macrophage infection experiments and immunoblot fraction control experiments.
Footnotes
Citation Perkowski EF, Zulauf KE, Weerakoon D, Hayden JD, Ioerger TR, Oreper D, Gomez SM, Sacchettini JC, Braunstein M. 2017. The EXIT strategy: an approach for identifying bacterial proteins exported during host infection. mBio 8:e00333-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00333-17.
REFERENCES
- 1.McCann JR, Kurtz S, Braunstein M. 2009. Secreted and exported proteins important to Mycobacterium tuberculosis pathogenesis, p 265–298. In Wooldridge K (ed), Bacterial secreted proteins: secretory mechanisms and role in pathogenesis. Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jackson M, McNeil MR, Brennan PJ. 2013. Progress in targeting cell envelope biogenesis in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Future Microbiol 8:855–875. doi: 10.2217/fmb.13.52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chandramouli K, Qian PY. 2009. Proteomics: challenges, techniques and possibilities to overcome biological sample complexity. Hum Genomics Proteomics 2009:239204. doi: 10.4061/2009/239204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.de Souza GA, Wiker HG. 2011. A proteomic view of mycobacteria. Proteomics 11:3118–3127. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201100043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Seo KS, Kim JW, Park JY, Viall AK, Minnich SS, Rohde HN, Schnider DR, Lim SY, Hong JB, Hinnebusch BJ, O’Loughlin JL, Deobald CF, Bohach GA, Hovde CJ, Minnich SA. 2012. Role of a new intimin/invasin-like protein in Yersinia pestis virulence. Infect Immun 80:3559–3569. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00294-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lewenza S, Gardy JL, Brinkman FS, Hancock RE. 2005. Genome-wide identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa exported proteins using a consensus computational strategy combined with a laboratory-based PhoA fusion screen. Genome Res 15:321–329. doi: 10.1101/gr.3257305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jacobs MA, Alwood A, Thaipisuttikul I, Spencer D, Haugen E, Ernst S, Will O, Kaul R, Raymond C, Levy R, Chun-Rong L, Guenthner D, Bovee D, Olson MV, Manoil C. 2003. Comprehensive transposon mutant library of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:14339–14344. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2036282100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mahan MJ, Heithoff DM, Sinsheimer RL, Low DA. 2000. Assessment of bacterial pathogenesis by analysis of gene expression in the host. Annu Rev Genet 34:139–164. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Darwin AJ. 2005. Genome-wide screens to identify genes of human pathogenic Yersinia species that are expressed during host infection. Curr Issues Mol Biol 7:135–149. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Broome-Smith JK, Spratt BG. 1986. A vector for the construction of translational fusions to TEM beta-lactamase and the analysis of protein export signals and membrane protein topology. Gene 49:341–349. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(86)90370-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.McCann JR, McDonough JA, Sullivan JT, Feltcher ME, Braunstein M. 2011. Genome-wide identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis exported proteins with roles in intracellular growth. J Bacteriol 193:854–861. doi: 10.1128/JB.01271-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Elofsson A, von Heijne G. 2007. Membrane protein structure: prediction versus reality. Annu Rev Biochem 76:125–140. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.76.052705.163539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Flores AR, Parsons LM, Pavelka MS Jr.. 2005. Genetic analysis of the beta-lactamases of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium smegmatis and susceptibility to beta-lactam antibiotics. Microbiology 151:521–532. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.27629-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sassetti CM, Rubin EJ. 2003. Genetic requirements for mycobacterial survival during infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:12989–12994. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2134250100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhang YJ, Reddy MC, Ioerger TR, Rothchild AC, Dartois V, Schuster BM, Trauner A, Wallis D, Galaviz S, Huttenhower C, Sacchettini JC, Behar SM, Rubin EJ. 2013. Tryptophan biosynthesis protects mycobacteria from CD4 T-cell-mediated killing. Cell 155:1296–1308. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lamichhane G, Tyagi S, Bishai WR. 2005. Designer arrays for defined mutant analysis to detect genes essential for survival of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in mouse lungs. Infect Immun 73:2533–2540. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.4.2533-2540.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Orme I, Gonzalez-Juarrero M. 2007. Animal models of M. tuberculosis infection. Curr Protoc Microbiol Chapter 10:Unit 10A.5. doi: 10.1002/9780471729259.mc10a05s7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Goldberg M, Saini NK, Porcelli SA. 2014. Evasion of innate and adaptive immunity by Mycobacteriumtuberculosis. ASM Press, Washington, DC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Palucci I, Camassa S, Cascioferro A, Sali M, Anoosheh S, Zumbo A, Minerva M, Iantomasi R, De Maio F, Di Sante G, Ria F, Sanguinetti M, Palu G, Brennan MJ, Manganelli R, Delogu G. 2016. PE_PGRS33 contributes to Mycobacterium tuberculosis entry in macrophages through interaction with TLR2. PLoS One 11:e0150800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bottai D, Stinear TP, Supply P, Brosch R. 2014, Mycobacterial pathogenomics and evolution. ASM Press, Washington, DC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Claros MG, von Heijne G. 1994. TopPred II: an improved software for membrane protein structure predictions. Comput Appl Biosci 10:685–686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Belardinelli JM, Yazidi A, Yang L, Fabre L, Li W, Jacques B, Angala SK, Rouiller I, Zgurskaya HI, Sygusch J, Jackson M. 2016. Structure-function profile of MmpL3, the essential mycolic acid transporter from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. ACS Infect Dis 2:702–713. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.6b00095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Li W, Obregón-Henao A, Wallach JB, North EJ, Lee RE, Gonzalez-Juarrero M, Schnappinger D, Jackson M. 2016. Therapeutic potential of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis mycolic acid transporter, MmpL3. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:5198–5207. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00826-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Li W, Upadhyay A, Fontes FL, North EJ, Wang Y, Crans DC, Grzegorzewicz AE, Jones V, Franzblau SG, Lee RE, Crick DC, Jackson M. 2014. Novel insights into the mechanism of inhibition of MmpL3, a target of multiple pharmacophores in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:6413–6423. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03229-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rayasam GV. 2014. MmpL3 a potential new target for development of novel anti-tuberculosis drugs. Expert Opin Ther Targets 18:247–256. doi: 10.1517/14728222.2014.859677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Remuiñán MJ, Pérez-Herrán E, Rullás J, Alemparte C, Martínez-Hoyos M, Dow DJ, Afari J, Mehta N, Esquivias J, Jiménez E, Ortega-Muro F, Fraile-Gabaldón MT, Spivey VL, Loman NJ, Pallen MJ, Constantinidou C, Minick DJ, Cacho M, Rebollo-López MJ, González C, Sousa V, Angulo-Barturen I, Mendoza-Losana A, Barros D, Besra GS, Ballell L, Cammack N. 2013. Tetrahydropyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine-3-carboxamide and N-benzyl-6′,7′-dihydrospiro[piperidine-4,4′-thieno[3,2-c]pyran] analogues with bactericidal efficacy against Mycobacterium tuberculosis targeting MmpL3. PLoS One 8:e60933. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Poce G, Bates RH, Alfonso S, Cocozza M, Porretta GC, Ballell L, Rullas J, Ortega F, De Logu A, Agus E, La Rosa V, Pasca MR, De Rossi E, Wae B, Franzblau SG, Manetti F, Botta M, Biava M. 2013. Improved BM212 MmpL3 inhibitor analogue shows efficacy in acute murine model of tuberculosis infection. PLoS One 8:e56980. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tahlan K, Wilson R, Kastrinsky DB, Arora K, Nair V, Fischer E, Barnes SW, Walker JR, Alland D, Barry CE III, Boshoff HI. 2012. SQ109 targets MmpL3, a membrane transporter of trehalose monomycolate involved in mycolic acid donation to the cell wall core of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:1797–1809. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05708-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.La Rosa V, Poce G, Canseco JO, Buroni S, Pasca MR, Biava MR, Raju RM, Porretta GC, Alfonso S, Battilocchio C, Javid B, Sorrentino F, Ioerger TR, Sacchettini JC, Manetti F, Botta M, De Logu A, Rubin EJ, De Rossi EJ. 2012. MmpL3 is the cellular target of the antitubercular pyrrole derivative BM212. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:324–331. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05270-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sandhu P, Akhter Y. 2015. The internal gene duplication and interrupted coding sequences in the MmpL genes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: towards understanding the multidrug transport in an evolutionary perspective. Int J Med Microbiol 305:413–423. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2015.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Varela C, Rittmann D, Singh A, Krumbach K, Bhatt K, Eggeling L, Besra GS, Bhatt A. 2012. MmpL genes are associated with mycolic acid metabolism in mycobacteria and corynebacteria. Chem Biol 19:498–506. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.03.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ioerger TR, O’Malley T, Liao R, Guinn KM, Hickey MJ, Mohaideen N, Murphy KC, Boshoff HI, Mizrahi V, Rubin EJ, Sassetti CM, Barry CE III, Sherman DR, Parish T, Sacchettini JC. 2013. Identification of new drug targets and resistance mechanisms in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PLoS One 8:e75245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lamichhane G, Zignol M, Blades NJ, Geiman DE, Dougherty A, Grosset J, Broman KW, Bishai WR. 2003. A postgenomic method for predicting essential genes at subsaturation levels of mutagenesis: application to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:7213–7218. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1231432100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Danelishvili L, Yamazaki Y, Selker J, Bermudez LE. 2010. Secreted Mycobacterium tuberculosis Rv3654c and Rv3655c proteins participate in the suppression of macrophage apoptosis. PLoS One 5:e10474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Perkowski EF, Miller BK, McCann JR, Sullivan JT, Malik S, Allen IC, Godfrey V, Hayden JD, Braunstein M. 2016. An orphaned Mce-associated membrane protein of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is a virulence factor that stabilizes Mce transporters. Mol Microbiol 100:90–107. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wolfe LM, Mahaffey SB, Kruh NA, Dobos KM. 2010. Proteomic definition of the cell wall of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Proteome Res 9:5816–5826. doi: 10.1021/pr1005873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Harth G, Lee BY, Wang J, Clemens DL, Horwitz MA. 1996. Novel insights into the genetics, biochemistry, and immunocytochemistry of the 30-kilodalton major extracellular protein of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect Immun 64:3038–3047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zhao S, Zhao Y, Mao F, Zhang C, Bai B, Zhang H, Shi C, Xu Z. 2012. Protective and therapeutic efficacy of Mycobacterium smegmatis expressing HBHA-hIL12 fusion protein against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in mice. PLoS One 7:e31908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Song H, Sandie R, Wang Y, Andrade-Navarro MA, Niederweis M. 2008. Identification of outer membrane proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Tuberculosis 88:526–544. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2008.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Speer A, Sun J, Danilchanka O, Meikle V, Rowland JL, Walter K, Buck BR, Pavlenok M, Hölscher C, Ehrt S, Niederweis M. 2015. Surface hydrolysis of sphingomyelin by the outer membrane protein Rv0888 supports replication of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in macrophages. Mol Microbiol 97:881–897. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Saleh MT, Belisle JT. 2000. Secretion of an acid phosphatase (SapM) by Mycobacterium tuberculosis that is similar to eukaryotic acid phosphatases. J Bacteriol 182:6850–6853. doi: 10.1128/JB.182.23.6850-6853.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Nagai S, Wiker HG, Harboe M, Kinomoto M. 1991. Isolation and partial characterization of major protein antigens in the culture fluid of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect Immun 59:372–382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Houben EN, Korotkov KV, Bitter W. 2014. Take five—type VII secretion systems of mycobacteria. Biochim Biophys Acta 1843:1707–1716. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Braunstein M, Espinosa B, Chan J, Belisle JT, Jacobs WR Jr.. 2003. SecA2 functions in the secretion of superoxide dismutase A and in the virulence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mol Microbiol 48:453–464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Feltcher ME, Gunawardena HP, Zulauf KE, Malik S, Griffin JE, Sassetti CM, Chen X, Braunstein M. 2015. Label-free quantitative proteomics reveals a role for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis SecA2 pathway in exporting solute binding proteins and Mce transporters to the cell wall. Mol Cell Proteomics 14:1501–1506. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M114.044685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.van der Woude AD, Stoop EJ, Stiess M, Wang S, Ummels R, van Stempvoort G, Piersma SR, Cascioferro A, Jiménez CR, Houben EN, Luirink J, Pieters J, van der Sar AM, Bitter W. 2014. Analysis of SecA2-dependent substrates in Mycobacterium marinum identifies protein kinase G (PknG) as a virulence effector. Cell Microbiol 16:280–295. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Rosenberger T, Brülle JK, Sander P. 2013. Retraction: a beta-lactamase based reporter system for ESX dependent protein translocation in mycobacteria. PLoS One doi: 10.1371/annotation/f03f7456-0e04-4c4b-a606-51f262900e8d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 48.Rosenberger T, Brülle JK, Sander P. 2012. A beta-lactamase based reporter system for ESX dependent protein translocation in mycobacteria. PLoS One 7:e35453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 49.Daleke MH, Ummels R, Bawono P, Heringa J, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM, Luirink J, Bitter W. 2012. General secretion signal for the mycobacterial type VII secretion pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:11342–11347. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1119453109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Abdallah AM, Verboom T, Weerdenburg EM, Gey van Pittius NC, Mahasha PW, Jiménez C, Parra M, Cadieux N, Brennan MJ, Appelmelk BJ, Bitter W. 2009. PPE and PE_PGRS proteins of Mycobacterium marinum are transported via the type VII secretion system ESX-5. Mol Microbiol 73:329–340. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06783.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.VanderVen BC, Harder JD, Crick DC, Belisle JT. 2005. Export-mediated assembly of mycobacterial glycoproteins parallels eukaryotic pathways. Science 309:941–943. doi: 10.1126/science.1114347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Liu CF, Tonini L, Malaga W, Beau M, Stella A, Bouyssié D, Jackson MC, Nigou J, Puzo G, Guilhot C, Burlet-Schiltz O, Rivière M. 2013. Bacterial protein-O-mannosylating enzyme is crucial for virulence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:6560–6565. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219704110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Tusnády GE, Simon I. 2001. The HMMTOP transmembrane topology prediction server. Bioinformatics 17:849–850. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.9.849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Girrbach V, Zeller T, Priesmeier M, Strahl-Bolsinger S. 2000. Structure-function analysis of the dolichyl phosphate-mannose: protein O-mannosyltransferase ScPmt1p. J Biol Chem 275:19288–19296. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M001771200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer ELL. 2001. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol 305:567–580. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Lew JM, Kapopoulou A, Jones LM, Cole ST. 2011. TubercuList—10 years after. Tuberculosis 91:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Stewart GR, Patel J, Robertson BD, Rae A, Young DB. 2005. Mycobacterial mutants with defective control of phagosomal acidification. PLoS Pathog 1:269–278. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0010033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Rifat D, Karakousis PC. 2014. Differential regulation of the two-component regulatory system senX3-regX3 in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microbiology 160:1125–1133. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.077180-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Glover RT, Kriakov J, Garforth SJ, Baughn AD, Jacobs WR Jr.. 2007. The two-component regulatory system senX3-regX3 regulates phosphate-dependent gene expression in Mycobacterium smegmatis. J Bacteriol 189:5495–5503. doi: 10.1128/JB.00190-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Rowland JL, Niederweis M. 2013. A multicopper oxidase is required for copper resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Bacteriol 195:3724–3733. doi: 10.1128/JB.00546-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Shi X, Festa RA, Ioerger TR, Butler-Wu S, Sacchettini JC, Darwin KH, Samanovic MI. 2014. The copper-responsive RicR regulon contributes to Mycobacterium tuberculosis virulence. mBio 5:e00876-13. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00876-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Shi X, Darwin KH. 2015. Copper homeostasis in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Metallomics 7:929–934. doi: 10.1039/c4mt00305e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Coombes BK, Lowden MJ, Bishop JL, Wickham ME, Brown NF, Duong N, Osborne S, Gal-Mor O, Finlay BB. 2007. SseL is a salmonella-specific translocated effector integrated into the SsrB-controlled salmonella pathogenicity island 2 type III secretion system. Infect Immun 75:574–580. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00985-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Marketon MM, DePaolo RW, DeBord KL, Jabri B, Schneewind O. 2005. Plague bacteria target immune cells during infection. Science 309:1739–1741. doi: 10.1126/science.1114580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Hersh D, Monack DM, Smith MR, Ghori N, Falkow S, Zychlinsky A. 1999. The Salmonella invasin SipB induces macrophage apoptosis by binding to caspase-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:2396–2401. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.5.2396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Mahdavi A, Szychowski J, Ngo JT, Sweredoski MJ, Graham RL, Hess S, Schneewind O, Mazmanian SK, Tirrell DA. 2014. Identification of secreted bacterial proteins by noncanonical amino acid tagging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:433–438. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1301740111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Chande AG, Siddiqui Z, Midha MK, Sirohi V, Ravichandran S, Rao KV. 2015. Selective enrichment of mycobacterial proteins from infected host macrophages. Sci Rep 5:13430. doi: 10.1038/srep13430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Braunstein M, Bardarov SS, Jacobs WR Jr.. 2002. Genetic methods for deciphering virulence determinants of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Methods Enzymol 358:67–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Pavelka MS Jr, Jacobs WR Jr.. 1999. Comparison of the construction of unmarked deletion mutations in Mycobacterium smegmatis, Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guerin, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv by allelic exchange. J Bacteriol 181:4780–4789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Robbins N, Koch SE, Tranter M, Rubinstein J. 2012. The history and future of probenecid. Cardiovasc Toxicol 12:1–9. doi: 10.1007/s12012-011-9145-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Fraley C, Raftery AE, Murphy TB, Scrucca L. 2012. MCLUST Version 4 for R: Normal mixture modeling for model-based clustering, classification, and density estimation, Technical Report no. 597, Department of Statistics, University of Washington. http://www.stat.washington.edu/mclust/. [Google Scholar]
- 72.Plocinska R, Purushotham G, Sarva K, Vadrevu IS, Pandeeti EV, Arora N, Plocinski P, Madiraju MV, Rajagopalan M. 2012. Septal localization of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis MtrB sensor kinase promotes MtrA regulon expression. J Biol Chem 287:23887–23899. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.346544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Petersen TN, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H. 2011. SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat Methods 8:785–786. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Sutcliffe IC, Harrington DJ. 2004. Lipoproteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: an abundant and functionally diverse class of cell envelope components. FEMS Microbiol Rev 28:645–659. doi: 10.1016/j.femsre.2004.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.McDonough JA, McCann JR, Tekippe EM, Silverman JS, Rigel NW, Braunstein M. 2008. Identification of functional Tat signal sequences in Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteins. J Bacteriol 190:6428–6438. doi: 10.1128/JB.00749-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Sullivan JT, Young EF, McCann JR, Braunstein M. 2012. The Mycobacterium tuberculosis SecA2 system subverts phagosome maturation to promote growth in macrophages. Infect Immun 80:996–1006. doi: 10.1128/IAI.05987-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Saleh MT, Fillon M, Brennan PJ, Belisle JT. 2001. Identification of putative exported/secreted proteins in prokaryotic proteomes. Gene 269:195–204. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(01)00436-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Rifat D, Belchis DA, Karakousis PC. 2014. senX3-independent contribution of regX3 to Mycobacterium tuberculosis virulence. BMC Microbiol 14:265. doi: 10.1186/s12866-014-0265-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Tischler AD, Leistikow RL, Kirksey MA, Voskuil MI, McKinney JD. 2013. Mycobacterium tuberculosis requires phosphate-responsive gene regulation to resist host immunity. Infect Immun 81:317–328. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01136-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Gioffré A, Infante E, Aguilar D, Santangelo MP, Klepp L, Amadio A, Meikle V, Etchechoury I, Romano MI, Cataldi A, Hernández RP, Bigi F. 2005. Mutation in mce operons attenuates Mycobacterium tuberculosis virulence. Microbes Infect 7:325–334. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2004.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Sassetti CM, Boyd DH, Rubin EJ. 2003. Genes required for mycobacterial growth defined by high density mutagenesis. Mol Microbiol 48:77–84. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03425.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Schnappinger D, Ehrt S, Voskuil MI, Liu Y, Mangan JA, Monahan IM, Dolganov G, Efron B, Butcher PD, Nathan C, Schoolnik GK. 2003. Transcriptional adaptation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis within macrophages: insights into the phagosomal environment. J Exp Med 198:693–704. doi: 10.1084/jem.20030846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Chuang YM, Bandyopadhyay N, Rifat D, Rubin H, Bader JS, Karakousis PC. 2015. Deficiency of the novel exopolyphosphatase Rv1026/PPX2 leads to metabolic downshift and altered cell wall permeability in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. mBio 6:e02428. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02428-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Papavinasasundaram KG, Chan B, Chung JH, Colston MJ, Davis EO, Av-Gay Y. 2005. Deletion of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis pknH gene confers a higher bacillary load during the chronic phase of infection in BALB/c mice. J Bacteriol 187:5751–5760. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.16.5751-5760.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Dubnau E, Chan J, Mohan VP, Smith I. 2005. Responses of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to growth in the mouse lung. Infect Immun 73:3754–3757. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.6.3754-3757.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Dutta NK, Mehra S, Didier PJ, Roy CJ, Doyle LA, Alvarez X, Ratterree M, Be NA, Lamichhane G, Jain SK, Lacey MR, Lackner AA, Kaushal D. 2010. Genetic requirements for the survival of tubercle bacilli in primates. J Infect Dis 201:1743–1752. doi: 10.1086/652497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Marjanovic O, Miyata T, Goodridge A, Kendall LV, Riley LW. 2010. Mce2 operon mutant strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is attenuated in C57BL/6 mice. Tuberculosis 90:50–56. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2009.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Senaratne RH, Sidders B, Sequeira P, Saunders G, Dunphy K, Marjanovic O, Reader JR, Lima P, Chan S, Kendall S, McFadden J, Riley LW. 2008. Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains disrupted in mce3 and mce4 operons are attenuated in mice. J Med Microbiol 57:164–170. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.47454-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Dubnau E, Fontán P, Manganelli R, Soares-Appel S, Smith I. 2002. Mycobacterium tuberculosis genes induced during infection of human macrophages. Infect Immun 70:2787–2795. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.6.2787-2795.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Talaat AM, Ward SK, Wu CW, Rondon E, Tavano C, Bannantine JP, Lyons R, Johnston SA. 2007. Mycobacterial bacilli are metabolically active during chronic tuberculosis in murine lungs: insights from genome-wide transcriptional profiling. J Bacteriol 189:4265–4274. doi: 10.1128/JB.00011-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Rengarajan J, Bloom BR, Rubin EJ. 2005. Genome-wide requirements for Mycobacterium tuberculosis adaptation and survival in macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:8327–8332. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0503272102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Rachman H, Strong M, Ulrichs T, Grode L, Schuchhardt J, Mollenkopf H, Kosmiadi GA, Eisenberg D, Kaufmann SH. 2006. Unique transcriptome signature of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in pulmonary tuberculosis. Infect Immun 74:1233–1242. doi: 10.1128/IAI.74.2.1233-1242.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Hu Y, van der Geize R, Besra GS, Gurcha SS, Liu A, Rohde M, Singh M, Coates A. 2010. 3-ketosteroid 9alpha-hydroxylase is an essential factor in the pathogenesis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mol Microbiol 75:107–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06957.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Raw sequencing data will be made available upon request.