Abstract
Exposure to organic dust from agricultural environments is associated with inflammatory respiratory conditions. The putative causal agents in organic dust include viral, microbial and fungal components, which are recognized by the family of toll-like receptors and drive host innate and adaptive responses. Our aim in this study was to determine whether responsiveness to organic dust among agricultural workers was dependent on polymorphisms in the TLR10-TLR1-TLR6 gene cluster. We stimulated whole blood from 509 agricultural workers with organic dust, triacyl lipopeptide N-palmitoyl-S-dipalmitoylglyceryl Cys-Ser-(Lys)4 (Pam3CSK4) and the diacyl- lipopeptide peptidoglycan. Several of the tagging polymorphisms and haplotypes conferred hyper-responsiveness to organic dust with an increase in IL-6 (p < 0.005), but not TNF-α, secretion. We conclude that genetic variation in the TLR10-TLR1-TLR6 gene cluster mediates responsiveness to organic dust, but indicates different signaling pathways for IL-6 and TNF-α. These studies provide new insight into the role of the TLR10-TLR1-TLR6 gene cluster and the innate immune response to organic dust.
Introduction
Inhalation of components from airborne microorganisms, as found in organic dust from agricultural environments, may lead to several inflammatory respiratory conditions including rhinosinusitis, asthma, chronic bronchitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and hypersensitivity pneumonitis (1–3). The putative inflammatory agents in organic dust include viral, microbial and fungal components (1, 4, 5). A challenge in defining mechanisms of organic dust-induced inflammatory responses is the complex nature of the dust. We and others have found a strong predominance of gram-positive bacteria in organic dust from swine confinement facilities (6, 7). Specifically, the anaerobes from the genera Clostridium, Lactobacillus, Ruminococcus, Eubacterium and Prevotella constituted the majority of bacteria in the swine dust (4). In a mass spectrometry analysis, swine dust was found to have high concentrations of muramic acid, a component of PGN, which originates from gram-positive bacteria (i.e. 85% of total cell wall) and to a lesser extent gram-negative bacteria (5% of cell wall) (5). The family of toll-like receptors (TLRs) recognizes these environmental components and drives the acute production of proinflammatory mediators, including cytokines, chemokines and cell- adhesion molecules, which are critical for an effective host defense and adaptive immune response (8).
Ten human TLRs have been identified to date and they differentially recognize restricted ligands (9, 10). In humans, the TLR10, TLR1 and TLR6 genes are tandemly arranged on chromosome 4p14 and are believed to have arisen from duplication events (11). Phylogeny supports the theory that TLR10 existed before the gene duplication event that generated TLR1 and TLR6 (12, 13). Although most TLRs signal as homodimers, TLR10, TLR1 and TLR6 require ligation with TLR2. The TLR1/2 and TLR6/2 heterodimers can discriminate between the acylation state of bacterial lipopeptides from microorganisms recognizing triacyl- and diacyl- lipopeptides, respectively (14–16). The synthetic triacyl lipopeptide N-palmitoyl-S-dipalmitoylglyceryl Cys-Ser-(Lys)4 (Pam3CSK4) has been shown to stimulate specifically via TLR1/2 (14, 17); whereas, TLR6/2 heterodimers recognize diacyl- lipopeptides, for example, peptidoglycan (PGN) (18). Despite extensive research on TLRs, the ligand(s) and function for human TLR10 has been uncertain. Recently, Guan et al showed that TLR10/2 senses triacylated lipopeptides (Pam3CSK4) and a wide variety of other microbial- derived agonists shared by TLR1, but not TLR6 (16). However, TLR10 alone or in cooperation with TLR2 fails to activate typical TLR downstream signaling pathways (19).
The ability of the host to respond to organic dust found in the environment is highly variable. Differences between individuals have been reported in the release and synthesis of cytokines from host cells stimulated with bacterial components and this variability has been attributed, in part, to genetic variation in the TLR genes (20–25). Much of the variation in response to TLR2 agonists is thought to be driven by polymorphisms in the TLR10-TLR1-TLR6 gene cluster [20]. Others have found that among individuals working in agriculture, some develop respiratory symptoms and disease while others remain healthy. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine whether individual differences among agricultural workers, in response to organic dust, are dependent upon single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the TLR10-TLR1-TLR6 gene cluster using a whole blood assay.
Results
TLR10-TLR1-TLR6 gene cluster
The location of tagging SNPs, linkage disequilibrium (LD) and minor allele frequencies (MAFs) in the TLR10-TLR1-TLR6 gene cluster are shown in Figure 1 and Table S1. The tagging SNPs in each gene had considerable LD within the TLR10-TLR1-TLR6 gene cluster (r2 > 0.8). Four of the chosen tagging SNPs had putative amino acid substitutions, one in the TLR10 gene, two in the TLR1 gene and one in the TLR6 gene. The MAFs for the tagging SNPs were consistent with frequencies reported from the HapMap Project in the Centre d’Etude du Polymorphisme Humain (CEPH) pedigrees (26).
Figure 1.
Schematic diagram of the TLR10-TLR1-TLR6 gene cluster on chromosome 4. Top: Each tagging polymorphism is indicated by an arrow. Black boxes represent coding region; grey boxes represent non-coding untranslated exonic regions; grey line represents intronic regions and parallel vertical lines represent intragenic regions. TLR, Toll-like receptor. Bottom: Linkage disequilibrium (LD) between tagging polymorphisms. LD values presented as r2 × 100.
Study Population
There were 681 veterans enrolled in the AgLUNG study (27). However for this study, only participants with genotyping data and organic dust- stimulated and Pam3CSK4- stimulated IL-6 and TNF-α levels were included in the analysis (n = 509). Study population characteristics stratified by organic dust- stimulated IL-6 and TNF-α level are presented in Table 1. Reflecting demographic trends of the VA population in the urban Midwest (28), the AgLUNG population was composed primarily of white men (97%) with a median age of 65 (interquartile range [IQR] = 60 – 71 years). The length of time participants worked on a farm was substantial, with a median of 22 years (IQR = 13 – 43 years). The prevalence of ever smokers and COPD was 79% and 37%, respectively. Lower organic dust- stimulated IL-6 and TNF-α levels were associated with individuals that were younger and never smokers.
Table 1.
Characteristics of Study Population
| ln IL-61 (pg/mL/lymphocytes) n=509 |
Ln TNF-α1 (pg/mL/lymphocytes) n=509 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Mean | (SD) | Mean | (SD) | |
| Age, years | |||||
| 39–50 | 31 | 8.854^ | (0.441) | 6.545^ | (0.604) |
| 51–60 | 104 | 8.981 | (0.716) | 6.788 | (0.764) |
| 61–70 | 238 | 9.152 | (0.647) | 7.058 | (0.740) |
| 71–80 | 136 | 9.244 | (0.593) | 7.122 | (0.855) |
| Sex | |||||
| Male | 496 | 9.132 | (0.647) | 6.994 | (0.788) |
| Female | 13 | 8.801 | (0.501) | 6.789 | (0.710) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | |||||
| <25 | 70 | 9.181 | (0.701) | 6.997 | (0.909) |
| 25–29.9 | 149 | 9.152 | (0.606) | 7.014 | (0.941) |
| ≥30 | 290 | 9.095 | (0.653) | 6.974 | (0.659) |
| Race2 | |||||
| White | 481 | 9.131 | (0.632) | 7.002 | (0.777) |
| Other | 22 | 8.973 | (0.901) | 6.721 | (0.924) |
| Education2 | |||||
| ≤ High School | 221 | 9.167 | (0.628) | 7.037 | (0.745) |
| > High School | 271 | 9.107 | (0.613) | 6.959 | (0.812) |
| Smoking Status2 | |||||
| Never | 108 | 8.898^ | (0.569) | 6.657^ | (0.750) |
| Former | 292 | 9.198 | (0.669) | 7.122 | (0.794) |
| Current | 104 | 9.159 | (0.589) | 6.972 | (0.677) |
| COPD2 | |||||
| No | 319 | 9.143 | (0.660) | 6.999 | (0.785) |
| Yes | 188 | 9.084 | (0.623) | 6.965 | (0.790) |
| Worked on a Farm, yrs2 | |||||
| <10 | 75 | 9.092 | (0.796) | 6.918 | (0.765) |
| 10–19.9 | 145 | 9.099 | (0.607) | 6.901 | (0.739) |
| 20+ | 281 | 9.153 | (0.608) | 7.057 | (0.812) |
Abbreviations and Definitions: BMI, body mass index; COPD, FEV1/FVC < 0.70.
Whole blood assay; organic dust- stimulated
Numbers don’t add up to 100% due to missing data
Significant difference between groups, overall test, p<0.05.
Organic dust- stimulated IL-6 and TNF-α levels and TLR10, TLR1 and TLR6 gene polymorphisms
Organic dust- stimulated IL-6 was associated with several TLR10, TLR1, and TLR6 polymorphisms assuming a dominant model (Table 2). TLR10 SNPs rs11466645, rs11466617, and rs11725309 showed increased organic dust- stimulated IL-6 levels in individuals carrying the minor allele compared to those homozygous for the dominant allele. Similarly, the minor allele at TLR1 rs4833095, rs5743595, and rs5743580, as well as TLR6 rs5743795 and rs5743788, was associated with increased IL-6 levels compared to individuals homozygous for the major allele. In contrast, one TLR6 SNP rs5743815 was associated with decreased levels of organic dust- stimulated IL-6 when comparing individuals carrying the minor allele to those homozygous for the major allele. All associations were strengthened after adjustment for covariates in a multivariable regression model (including age, BMI, education, sex, COPD/smoke status, race and years worked on a farm), and passed adjustment for a false discovery rate of either 1% or 5%. Interestingly, marginal associations were observed between TLR10, TLR1, and TLR6 polymorphisms and organic dust- stimulated TNF-α levels; however, statistical significance was lost after applying a false discovery rate adjustment.
Table 2.
Association of TLR10, TLR1, and TLR6 Polymorphisms with Organic Dust- Stimulated IL-6 and TNF-α
| Ln IL-6 (pg/mL/lymphocytes) |
Ln
TNF-α (pg/mL/lymphocytes) |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNP | Gene | 1βSNP | 1SESNP | P-value2 | Padj-value3 | 1βSNP | 1SESNP | P-value2 | Padj-value3 |
| rs11466657 | TLR10 | 0.143 | 0.129 | 0.27 | 0.37 | 0.284 | 0.159 | 0.08 | 0.07 |
| rs11466645 | 0.127 | 0.064 | 0.046 | 0.008^ | 0.149 | 0.078 | 0.058 | 0.03 | |
| rs11466617 | 0.132 | 0.062 | 0.04 | 0.006^ | 0.143 | 0.076 | 0.059 | 0.03 | |
| rs7660429 | −0.006 | 0.070 | 0.93 | 0.64 | 0.001 | 0.085 | 0.99 | 0.51 | |
| rs11725309 | 0.156 | 0.063 | 0.014^ | 0.0017* | 0.157 | 0.078 | 0.045 | 0.03 | |
| rs3923647 | TLR1 | 0.062 | 0.141 | 0.66 | 0.16 | −0.040 | 0.176 | 0.82 | 0.71 |
| rs4833095 | 0.105 | 0.058 | 0.07 | 0.026^ | 0.113 | 0.073 | 0.12 | 0.04 | |
| rs5743595 | 0.204 | 0.062 | 0.001* | 0.0005* | 0.177 | 0.077 | 0.02 | 0.02 | |
| rs5743594 | 0.011 | 0.061 | 0.85 | 0.66 | −0.053 | 0.075 | 0.48 | 0.20 | |
| rs5743582 | 0.007 | 0.074 | 0.93 | 0.78 | −0.077 | 0.090 | 0.39 | 0.56 | |
| rs5743580 | 0.202 | 0.062 | 0.0012* | 0.0006* | 0.181 | 0.077 | 0.02 | 0.02 | |
| rs5743827 | TLR6 | 0.076 | 0.057 | 0.18 | 0.13 | −0.063 | 0.070 | 0.37 | 0.40 |
| rs5743815 | −0.660 | 0.160 | <0.0001* | <0.0001* | −0.319 | 0.201 | 0.11 | 0.13 | |
| rs5743795 | 0.162 | 0.061 | 0.0084^ | 0.0006* | 0.104 | 0.076 | 0.17 | 0.11 | |
| rs5743788 | 0.134 | 0.064 | 0.04 | 0.019^ | 0.031 | 0.081 | 0.70 | 0.49 | |
SNP-estimates are based on a dominant model. β estimates represent a natural log increase or decrease in stimulated Ln IL-6 and Ln TNF-α (pg/mL/lymphocytes), with the dominant genotype as the reference
Univariate p-value results are from t-tests
Multivariable results (padj) are adjusted for age, body mass index, education, sex, race, COPD/smoke and years worked on a farm
Passed the FDR adjustment at 1% level;
passed the FDR adjustment at 5% level
Organic dust- stimulated IL-6 and TNF-α levels and TLR10, TLR1 and TLR6 haplotypes
Given the high degree of LD within the TLR10-TLR1-TLR6 gene cluster, haplotypes were determined using Haploview Tagger (29). Ten of the 15 tagging SNPs were included in the haplotypes defined as rs11466657, rs7660429, rs3923647, rs4833095, rs5743594, rs5743582, rs5743580, rs5743827, rs5743815, and rs5743788. One haplotype showed significant increased organic dust- stimulated IL-6 levels when compared to the most frequent haplotype in both univariate and multivariable analysis. None of the haplotypes were associated with organic dust- stimulated TNF-α (Table 3).
Table 3.
Association of TLR10, TLR1, and TLR6 Haplotypes with Organic Dust-Stimulated IL-6 and TNF-α Levels
|
TLR10-TLR1-TLR6 Haplotypes1 |
n2 | Ln
IL-6 (pg/mL/lymphocytes) β (SE)3 |
P-value4 | Padj-value5 | n2 | Ln
TNF-α (pg/mL/lymphocytes) β (SE)3 |
P-value4 | Padj-value5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCATCCGGTG | 232 | 0 | Ref6 | Ref6 | 232 | 0 | Ref6 | Ref6 |
| CCACCCAGTC | 13 | 0.209 (0.128) | 0.10 | 0.13 | 13 | 0.231 (0.155) | 0.14 | 0.12 |
| TCACCCAGTC | 67 | 0.205 (0.065) | 0.002 | <0.001 | 67 | 0.109 (0.078) | 0.16 | 0.12 |
| TCATTCGATC | 84 | 0.088 (0.058) | 0.13 | 0.20 | 84 | −0.019 (0.071) | 0.78 | 0.61 |
| TGATCTGATC | 36 | 0.034 (0.084) | 0.68 | 0.31 | 36 | −0.053 (0.102) | 0.61 | 0.98 |
| Other | 77 | −0.029 (0.059) | 0.62 | 0.98 | 77 | −0.116 (0.071) | 0.10 | 0.38 |
Haplotypes defined as rs11466657, rs7660429, rs3923647, rs4833095, rs5743594, rs5743582, rs5743580, rs5743827, rs5743815, and rs5743788.
Sample sizes estimated from haplotype frequency
β represents the change compared to the reference haplotype
Univariate p-value results
Multivariable results (padj) are adjusted for age, BMI, education, sex, COPD/smoke status, race and years worked on a farm
Pairwise comparison to the reference haplotype
Pam3CSK4- stimulated IL-6 levels and TLR10, TLR1 and TLR6 gene polymorphisms
Associations between Pam3CSK4- stimulated IL-6 levels and TLR10, TLR1 and TLR6 gene polymorphisms were examined using a dominant model (Table 4). Four out of five of the TLR10 tagging SNPs were significantly associated with stimulated IL-6 levels in both the univariate and multivariate models, including the missense mutation rs11466657. All four of the TLR10 SNPs showed increased responsiveness to Pam3CSK4 with higher levels of IL-6 among individuals carrying the minor allele compared to those homozygous for the major allele. These associations remained significant even after correction for a false discovery rate. Five out of six of the TLR1 tagging SNPs were associated with Pam3CSK4- stimulated IL-6 levels in both univariate and multivariate models. Of the significant TLR1 SNPs, rs3923647 and rs4833095 were missense mutations. All of these TLR1 SNPs passed adjustment for the false discovery rate. For four of the TLR1 SNPs, veterans with the minor allele showed increased responsiveness and higher levels of Pam3CSK4- stimulated IL-6 levels compared to individuals homozygous for the major allele. The opposite was observed for rs5743594, where we found decreased responsiveness to Pam3CSK4 and lower levels of IL-6 in those carrying the minor allele. Three of the four TLR6 tagging SNPs were significantly associated with Pam3CSK4- stimulated IL-6 levels in the univariate analysis and all remained significant after adjustment for age, body mass index, education, sex, race, COPD/smoke and a false discovery rate adjustment at the 1% level.
Table 4.
Association of TLR10, TLR1, and TLR6 Polymorphisms with Pam3CSK4- Stimulated IL-6 and TNF-α
| Ln IL-6 (pg/mL/lymphocytes) | Ln TNF-α (pg/mL/lymphocytes) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNP | Gene | 1βSNP | 1SESNP | P-value2 | Padj-value3 | 1βSNP | 1SESNP | P-value2 | Padj-value3 |
| rs11466657 | TLR10 | 0.537 | 0.186 | 0.0039* | 0.0077^ | 0.803 | 0.224 | 0.0004* | 0.0008* |
| rs11466645 | 0.610 | 0.089 | <0.0001* | <0.0001* | 0.822 | 0.104 | <0.0001* | <0.0001* | |
| rs11466617 | 0.614 | 0.086 | <0.0001* | <0.0001* | 0.823 | 0.103 | <0.0001* | <0.0001* | |
| rs7660429 | 0.150 | 0.100 | 0.14 | 0.14 | −0.066 | 0.121 | 0.58 | 0.46 | |
| rs11725309 | 0.614 | 0.088 | <0.0001* | <0.0001* | 0.848 | 0.103 | <0.0001* | <0.0001* | |
| rs3923647 | TLR1 | 0.412 | 0.208 | 0.049 | 0.022^ | 0.467 | 0.250 | 0.063 | 0.034^ |
| rs4833095 | 0.666 | 0.081 | <0.0001* | <0.0001* | 0.880 | 0.096 | <0.0001* | <0.0001* | |
| rs5743595 | 0.658 | 0.087 | <0.0001* | <0.0001* | 0.912 | 0.103 | <0.0001* | <0.0001* | |
| rs5743594 | −0.174 | 0.087 | 0.047 | 0.037^ | −0.260 | 0.106 | 0.015^ | 0.016^ | |
| rs5743582 | 0.023 | 0.107 | 0.83 | 0.96 | −0.302 | 0.138 | 0.018^ | 0.0094^ | |
| rs5743580 | 0.657 | 0.088 | <0.0001* | <0.0001* | 0.912 | 0.103 | <0.0001* | <0.0001* | |
| rs5743827 | TLR6 | −0.027 | 0.083 | 0.74 | 0.83 | −0.265 | 0.099 | 0.0076^ | 0.0078^ |
| rs5743815 | −0.728 | 0.234 | 0.0019* | 0.0010* | 0.080 | 0.287 | 0.78 | 0.94 | |
| rs5743795 | 0.571 | 0.086 | <0.0001* | <0.0001* | 0.756 | 0.103 | <0.0001* | <0.0001* | |
| rs5743788 | 0.416 | 0.094 | <0.0001* | <0.0001* | 0.294 | 0.114 | 0.010^ | 0.012^ | |
SNP-estimates are based on a dominant model. β estimates represent a natural log increase or decrease in stimulated Ln IL-6 and TNF-α (pg/mL/lymphocytes), with the dominant genotype as the reference
Univariate p-value results are from t-tests
Multivariable results (padj) are adjusted for age, body mass index, education, sex, race, COPD/smoke and years worked on a farm
Passed the FDR adjustment at 1% level;
passed the FDR adjustment at 5% level
Pam3CSK4- stimulated TNF-α levels and TLR10, TLR1 and TLR6 gene polymorphisms
Similar associations were observed between Pam3CSK4- stimulated TNF-α levels and each of the tagging SNPs in the TLR10, TLR1 and TLR6 genes (Table 4), except for TLR1/rs5743582, TLR6/rs5743827, and TLR6/rs5743815. The SNPs rs5743582 and rs5743827 were associated with stimulated levels of TNF-α, yet were not associated with IL-6. In contrast, the SNP rs5743815 was not associated with Pam3CSK4- stimulated TNF-α, yet associated with stimulated IL-6 levels. Most associations remained significant after adjustment for covariates and a false discovery rate at the 1% or 5% level.
Pam3CSK4- stimulated IL-6 and TNF-α levels and TLR10, TLR1 and TLR6 haplotypes
Two of the haplotypes from the TLR10- TLR1- TLR6- gene cluster, showed significant increases in Pam3CSK4- stimulated IL-6 levels when compared to the most frequent haplotype (Table 5). These associations were retained after adjusting for age, BMI, education, sex, COPD/smoke status, race and years worked on a farm in a multivariate model. Both of the haplotypes that were associated with increased Pam3CSK4- stimulated IL-6, were also associated with increased Pam3CSK4- stimulated TNF-α.
Table 5.
Association of TLR10, TLR1, and TLR6 Haplotypes with Pam3CSK4-Stimulated IL-6 and TNF-α Levels
|
TLR10-TLR1-TLR6 Haplotypes1 |
n2 | Ln
IL-6 (pg/mL/lymphocytes) β (SE)3 |
P-value4 | Padj-value5 | n2 | Ln
TNF-α (pg/mL/lymphocytes) β (SE)3 |
P-value4 | Padj-value5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCATCCGGTG | 232 | 0 | Ref6 | Ref6 | 232 | 0 | Ref6 | Ref6 |
| CCACCCAGTC | 13 | 0.730 (0.175) | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 13 | 0.764 (0.205) | <0.0001 | 0.001 |
| TCACCCAGTC | 67 | 0.609 (0.087) | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 67 | 0.669 (0.103) | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| TCATTCGATC | 84 | 0.028 (0.080 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 84 | −0.029 (0.089) | 0.74 | 0.78 |
| TGATCTGATC | 36 | 0.158 (0.115) | 0.17 | 0.13 | 36 | −0.128 (0.132) | 0.33 | 0.23 |
| Other | 77 | 0.257 (0.079) | 0.001 | 0.001 | 77 | 0.117 (0.093) | 0.21 | 0.23 |
Haplotypes defined as rs11466657, rs7660429, rs3923647, rs4833095, rs5743594, rs5743582, rs5743580, rs5743827, rs5743815, and rs5743788.
Sample sizes estimated from haplotype frequency
β represents the change compared to the reference haplotype
Univariate p-value results
Multivariable results (padj) are adjusted for age, BMI, education, sex, COPD/smoke status, race and years worked on a farm
Pairwise comparison to the reference haplotype
Peptidoglycan- stimulated cytokines, TLR10, TLR1 and TLR6 gene polymorphisms and haplotypes
In order to assess the ligand specificity of our results, we performed a whole blood assay using peptidoglycan, the ligand for the TLR6/2 heterodimer. Only two of the TLR6 tagging polymorphisms were associated with peptidoglycan- stimulated IL-6 levels after adjustment for the false discovery rate (Table 6). In contrast, two SNPs in the TLR1 gene and one in the TLR6 gene were associated with peptidoglycan- stimulated TNF-α. One of the haplotypes showed significant increases in PGN- stimulated IL-6 and TNF-α levels when compared to the most frequent haplotype (Table 7). These associations were retained after adjusting for age, BMI, education, sex, COPD/smoke status, race and years worked on a farm in a multivariate model.
Table 6.
Association of TLR10, TLR1, and TLR6 Polymorphisms with Peptidoglycan-Stimulated IL-6 and TNF-α
| Ln IL-6 (pg/mL/lymphocytes) | Ln TNF-α (pg/mL/lymphocytes) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNP | Gene | 1βSNP | 1SESNP | P-value2 | Padj-value3 | 1βSNP | 1SESNP | P-value2 | Padj-value3 |
| rs11466657 | TLR10 | 0.083 | 0.118 | 0.48 | 0.61 | 0.180 | 0.158 | 0.25 | 0.30 |
| rs11466645 | 0.059 | 0.055 | 0.28 | 0.24 | 0.157 | 0.075 | 0.037 | 0.052 | |
| rs11466617 | 0.074 | 0.055 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.168 | 0.074 | 0.024 | 0.037 | |
| rs7660429 | 0.070 | 0.062 | 0.25 | 0.095 | 0.005 | 0.083 | 0.95 | 0.53 | |
| rs11725309 | 0.084 | 0.088 | 0.13 | 0.093 | 0.169 | 0.075 | 0.026 | 0.034 | |
| rs3923647 | TLR1 | 0.240 | 0.129 | 0.064 | 0.039 | 0.106 | 0.176 | 0.55 | 0.43 |
| rs4833095 | 0.088 | 0.052 | 0.091 | 0.041 | 0.149 | 0.071 | 0.036 | 0.021 | |
| rs5743595 | 0.123 | 0.055 | 0.026 | 0.022 | 0.215 | 0.075 | 0.0042^ | 0.0058^ | |
| rs5743594 | 0.039 | 0.054 | 0.47 | 0.75 | 0.042 | 0.072 | 0.56 | 0.86 | |
| rs5743582 | 0.033 | 0.065 | 0.61 | 0.39 | −0.041 | 0.087 | 0.64 | 0.97 | |
| rs5743580 | 0.121 | 0.055 | 0.029 | 0.024 | 0.215 | 0.075 | 0.0043^ | 0.0062^ | |
| rs5743827 | TLR6 | 0.094 | 0.051 | 0.064 | 0.054 | 0.043 | 0.068 | 0.53 | 0.47 |
| rs5743815 | −0.472 | 0.142 | 0.0009^ | 0.0006* | −0.278 | 0.191 | 0.15 | 0.085 | |
| rs5743795 | 0.118 | 0.055 | 0.032 | 0.021 | 0.129 | 0.074 | 0.082 | 0.11 | |
| rs5743788 | 0.141 | 0.057 | 0.014 | 0.0065^ | 0.178 | 0.078 | 0.023 | 0.010^ | |
SNP-estimates are based on a dominant model. β estimates represent a natural log increase or decrease in Ln IL-6 or Ln TNF-α, with the dominant genotype as the reference
Univariate p-value results are from t-tests
Multivariable results (padj) are adjusted for age, body mass index, education, sex, race, COPD/smoke and years worked on a farm
Passed the FDR adjustment at 1% level;
passed the FDR adjustment at 5% level.
Table 7.
Association of TLR10, TLR1, and TLR6 Haplotypes with Peptidoglycan-Stimulated IL-6 and TNF-α
|
TLR10-TLR1-TLR6 Haplotypes1 |
n2 | Ln
IL-6 (pg/mL/lymphocytes) β (SE)3 |
P-value4 | Padj-value5 | n2 | Ln
TNF-α (pg/mL/lymphocytes) β (SE)3 |
P-value4 | Padj-value5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCATCCGGTG | 232 | 0 | Ref6 | Ref6 | 232 | 0 | Ref6 | Ref6 |
| CCACCCAGTC | 13 | 0.186 (0.116) | 0.11 | 0.18 | 13 | 0.245 (0.152) | 0.11 | 0.17 |
| TCACCCAGTC | 67 | 0.152 (0.059) | 0.010 | 0.003 | 67 | 0.187 (0.077) | 0.015 | 0.014 |
| TCATTCGATC | 84 | 0.079 (0.053) | 0.14 | 0.18 | 84 | 0.069 (0.070) | 0.32 | 0.46 |
| TGATCTGATC | 36 | 0.096 (0.076) | 0.21 | 0.095 | 36 | 0.041 (0.100) | 0.68 | 0.48 |
| Other | 77 | 0.042 (0.053) | 0.42 | 0.12 | 77 | −0.035 (0.069) | 0.61 | 0.97 |
Haplotypes defined as rs11466657, rs7660429, rs3923647, rs4833095, rs5743594, rs5743582, rs5743580, rs5743827, rs5743815, and rs5743788.
Sample sizes estimated from haplotype frequency
β represents the change compared to the reference haplotype
Univariate p-value results
Multivariable results (padj) are adjusted for age, BMI, education, sex, COPD/smoke status, race and years worked on a farm
Pairwise comparison to the reference haplotype
Discussion
Due to the diverse population of gram-positive bacteria in dust from agricultural environments and because the TLR1 and TLR6 genes recognize cell wall components of gram-positive bacteria, we focused on polymorphisms in the TLR10-TLR1-TLR6 gene cluster as a likely locus in modifying dust-induced inflammation. We demonstrate that responsiveness to organic-dust, in an assay using whole blood from agricultural workers, was highly dependent on nine polymorphisms in the TLR10, TLR1 and TLR6 genes. This dependence was demonstrated for all SNPs by an increase in IL-6 production in carriers of the minor allele compared to those homozygous for the major allele. However, organic dust-stimulated production of TNF-α was not affected by these polymorphisms, suggesting different inflammatory signaling pathways between these two cytokines. To our knowledge, this is the first report to demonstrate an ex vivo functional role for the TLR10-TLR1-TLR6 gene cluster in mediating inflammatory responses to complex organic dust from agricultural environments.
Three TLR10 polymorphisms (rs11466645, rs11466617 and rs11725309) were strongly associated with both organic dust- and Pam3CSK4- stimulated IL-6 levels. These results suggest that TLR10 may play a role in the production of organic dust-stimulated IL-6. The fact that we see very similar results with Pam3CSK4 stimulation suggests a role for triacylated lipopeptides in organic dust induced IL-6. In contrast, TLR10 SNPs did not alter PGN-stimulated IL-6 production, which implies that PGN does not signal through the TLR10 receptor. These three TLR10 SNPs share a high degree of LD (r2 > 0.8) and appear to represent a single association. Though the function of these SNPs in the intronic region of TLR10 is unknown, they are in high LD (based on a reference population) with the missense SNP rs4129009 (TLR10 Ile775Val). The rs4129009 SNP is known to cause an amino acid change in the TIR domain of the intracellular portion of the protein and this TIR domain is important for intracellular signaling in other TLR receptors (30). The ligand for TLR10 is unknown; however, an in vitro study by Guan et al showed that the extracellular portion of the TLR10 receptor recognizes Pam3CSK4 when coupled with TLR1, yet intracellular signaling does not occur (16). However, our data shows increased IL-6 response to organic dust and Pam3CSK4 for TLR10 SNPs, which may suggest that a SNP in TLR10 (rs4129009), results in a functionally active TLR10 receptor. Previous studies have shown that rs4129009 was associated with increased TLR10 mRNA levels and conferred hyper responsiveness to Pam3CSK4 (21, 31), an observation consistent with our findings. Our data do not show that TLR10 SNPs modulate organic dust-stimulated TNF-α production; yet several of the TLR10 SNPs were significantly associated with increased production of Pam3CSK4-stimulated TNF-α, suggesting a signaling pathway independent of TLR10 for the stimulation of TNF-α by organic dust. Future work will need to identify and dissect the functionality of TLR10 SNPs and its signaling pathways.
Next we found that TLR1 polymorphisms modulate innate immune responses to organic dust and Pam3CSK4 (a synthetic triacylated lipopeptide). Triacylated lipopeptides are found in gram-positive bacteria and are ligands for TLR1/2 heterodimers. Three SNPs in the TLR1 gene (rs4833095, rs5743595 and rs5743580) were associated with both organic dust- and Pam3CSK4- stimulated IL-6 production. This is consistent with the known composition of gram-positive bacteria in organic dust from swine confinements (4–7). In contrast to Pam3CSK4, PGN signals through TLR6/2 heterodimers, thus, as expected; we did not observe an association between TLR1 SNPs and PGN-stimulated IL-6 production. We found moderate LD (r2 > 0.6) among the TLR1 SNPs (rs4833095, rs5743595 and rs5743580) indicating that their association with organic dust-stimulated IL-6 production may be due to only one of these SNPs or possibly another SNP in LD at another location in the gene region. TLR1 rs4833095 (Asn248Ser) is a missense SNP located in the extracellular domain of the receptor and was previously found to increase innate immune responses to Pam3CSK4 (21, 31, 32). However, studies investigating the functionality of this SNP have been inconsistent (33, 34). Wurfel and coworkers found that this SNP did not alter responsiveness to Pam3CSK4 in cloning and transfection experiments. However, the SNP rs5743618 (Ser602Ile) in high LD with rs4833095, did increase responsiveness (22, 35, 36). Additional studies confirmed hyper responsiveness to Pam3CSK4 with rs5743618 and also found that carriers of the isoleucine allele demonstrated higher surface expression of the TLR1 on peripheral monocytes and higher NF-κB activation in response to Pam3CSK4 relative to the serine allele (35, 36). Taken together, rs5743618, found in the transmembrane domain of TLR1, may be the functional variant and that surface trafficking of TLR1 contributes to its function to regulate the innate immune inflammatory response.
We identified three SNPs in the TLR6 gene that modified innate immune responses to organic dust. Two of these SNPs (rs5743795 and rs5743788) were associated with hyper responsiveness to organic dust and increased IL-6 production. The SNP rs5743795 is located in the intronic region of the TLR6 gene and was in strong LD with several TLR1 and TLR10 SNPs, namely the TLR1 missense SNP rs4833095. Differential IL-6 secretion through TLR1, and not TLR6, is supported by our data showing that rs5743795 was associated with altered IL-6 production in response to stimulation with the TLR1 ligand Pam3CSK4, but not the TLR6 ligand PGN (Table 6). Furthermore, this SNP was shown recently to be associated with differential responses to Pam3CSK4 (22). Interestingly, rs5743815 had the opposite effect compared to rs5743795, where those with the minor allele had decreased organic dust-stimulated IL-6 production compared to individuals homozygous for the major allele. The SNP rs5743815 was not in LD with the other tagging SNPs studied in the TLR10-TLR1-TLR6 gene cluster. It is a missense SNP (Val427Ala) with unknown function located in the extracellular leucine-rich domain of TLR6. To further resolve the complex causal relationships, functional analyses should be undertaken. Only then will we be able to conclusively identify the contributions of single SNPs in this TLR cluster on the overall effects of organic dust- stimulated cytokine production.
Haplotypes were constructed using 10 of the 15 SNPs investigated in this study. Association analysis showed that one defined haplotype was associated with organic-dust stimulated IL-6 release. The same haplotype was also associated with Pam3CSK4- and PGN- stimulated IL-6. In the haplotype analysis, increased IL-6 was driven by the minor allele in three SNPs, rs4833095 (TLR1), rs5743580 (TLR1) and rs5743788 (TLR6), relative to the reference haplotype. These results are in concordance with our individual SNP analysis. It must be emphasized that these three polymorphisms studied in the haplotype analysis do not act in isolation because of their close proximity on chromosome 4p14 and the high LD among these genes.
In addition to these tagging SNPs, we must consider the possibility that other SNPs not genotyped in our study, but are in LD with these variants, are the functional polymorphisms responsible for increased IL-6 stimulation. Proving this will require in vitro and animal experiments using engineered TLR receptors. Furthermore, rare variants were not investigated in this study and future studies would require a larger population than the current for sufficient statistical power.
In conclusion, the present study demonstrates an important role of the TLR10-TLR1-TLR6 gene cluster to account for variability of IL-6 production in response to organic dust exposure in humans. Furthermore, the presence of genetic variation leads to upregulation of the innate immune response upon organic dust challenge of whole blood from agricultural workers. Polymorphisms within the TLR10-TLR1-TLR6 locus have been associated with altered susceptibility to diseases such as mycobacterial infections of leprosy (TLR1 Ser602Ile in high LD with TLR1 N248S), sepsis (TLR1 rs5743551 in LD with TLR1 N248S), prostate cancer (TLR1 N248S; TLR10 N241H in LD with TLR10 rs11466645), non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (TLR1 N248S), Crohn’s disease (TLR1 N248S), asthma (TLR10 Ile775Val in LD with TLR10 rs11466645; TLR1 N248S) and chronic sarcoidosis (TLR10 N241H in LD with TLR10 rs11466645) (22, 31, 35, 37–40). Possible future directions for study include the relevance of SNPs in this locus with acute and chronic disease in agricultural workers.
Methods
Study Population and Clinical Assessments
The Agricultural Lung (AgLUNG) study is a cross sectional study of veterans that have worked on a farm for > 2 years as an adult. The study was designed to assess the relationship between agricultural exposures and chronic respiratory disease in persons seeking care at the General Medicine clinics in the VA Nebraska Western Iowa Heath Care System. There were 681 veterans recruited from 2008 to 2013 that were between the ages of 40 and 80 years, however 509 participants are included in this analysis due to availability of genotyping data and organic dust- stimulated and Pam3CSK4- stimulated IL-6 and TNF-α levels. Veterans were excluded if they had a history of lung cancer, metastatic cancer to the lungs or interstitial lung disease such pulmonary fibrosis, asthma, sarcoidosis, hypersensitivity pneumonitis or if they had a history of an infection in the three weeks prior to study enrollment. Eligibility information was obtained by self-report and medical chart confirmation. Subject demographics, respiratory symptoms, smoking habits and agricultural exposures were obtained by in-person and telephone interviews. A participant was considered to be a smoker if they had smoked more than 100 cigarettes in their lifetime. All veterans underwent spirometry and if they had a FEV1/FVC < 0.70, then post-bronchodilator spirometry with 0.083% albuterol was performed. COPD status was ascertained for each participant using the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) definition of post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.70 (41). FEV1 and FVC were adjusted for height, weight, age, gender and ethnicity based on NHANESIII reference equations (42). All participants signed a written informed consent document at study enrollment. This study was approved by the VA Nebraska Western Iowa Healthcare Systems Institutional Review Board.
Whole Blood Assay
Heparinized blood was diluted with L-glutamine-RPMI 1640 medium (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) at a 1:1 ratio and stimulated with organic dust extract (1%), triacyl lipopeptide N-palmitoyl-S-dipalmitoylglyceryl Cys-Ser-(Lys)4 (Pam3CSK4, 1 ng/ml), peptidoglycan (PGN, 10 µg/ml) or phosphate buffered saline. Blood was incubated for 24 hr at 37°C with 5% CO2, and then centrifuged at 500 × g for 5 min. Cell-free supernates were stored at −80°C for later cytokine analysis. Blood samples were processed within 2 hr of collection.
Organic Dust Extract
Swine confinement animal feeding operation facility organic dust was collected and prepared as previously described (43). Briefly, settled surface dust samples from local swine confinement feeding operations were extracted in Hank’s balanced salt solution, centrifuged filter sterilized and stored at −20°C (100% dust extract). The extract prepared in this manner contains no particulate matter larger than 0.2 µm in diameter. The dust extract was diluted to a final concentration of 1% (vol/vol) for all experiments.
TNF-α and IL-6 ELISAs
For IL-6 and TNF-α measurement, a sandwich ELISA was employed (43). In brief, flat-bottomed polystyrene microtiter plates were coated with 200 µl/well of purified (goat) anti-human IL-6 or (mouse) anti-human TNF-α antibody (2 µg/mL) (both from R & D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) in carbonate buffer (pH 9.6) overnight at 4°C. After washing the plates three times in phosphate buffered saline/Tween 20 (PBS-T), cell-free whole blood assay supernates were dispensed in duplicate wells and incubated at room temperature for 2 hr. Plates were again washed three times with PBS-T and incubated with (rabbit) anti-human IL-6 antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) diluted 1:1000 or biotinylated (goat) anti-human TNF-α (1:250) (R & D Systems) in PBS-T/BLOTTO (0.2% instant nonfat milk, PBS-T/B) for 1 hr. After three plate washes, human serum-absorbed peroxidase conjugated (goat) anti-rabbit IgG (Rockland Immunochemicals, Limerick, PA) was added at 1:2000 (IL-6) or streptavidin-HRP (1:200, for TNF-α) (R & D Systems) in PBS-T/B for 1 hr. The plates were again washed three times and 200 µl/well of peroxidase substrate (10 ng/ml orthophenylenediamine containing 0.003% H2O2 (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to IL-6 plates, and 100 µL/well TMB substrate (R & D Systems) for the TNF-α plates. The reaction was terminated with 27.5 µl/well of 8M sulfuric acid, and plates were read at 490nm or 450nm using the VERSAmax microplate reader. Cytokine concentrations were interpolated from an integrated 8-point standard curve created using purified recombinant human proteins. The limits of detectability for the human cytokine assays were: IL-6, 60 pg/mL and TNF-α, 15 pg/mL.
Genetic analysis
As part of the HapMap Project and the Innate Immunity Program in Genomic Applications, the TLR10, TLR1, and TLR6 genes were resequenced from DNA obtained from 30 trios from Utah residents with Northern or Western European ancestry (the CEPH population). A haplotype tagging strategy using publicly available software (44) and SNPs identified in the intronic sequence, ∼ 6 kb of 5’ genomic DNA and 2 kb of 3’ genomic DNA was implemented to reduce the number of SNPs analyzed and to capture the polymorphic structure of the gene. The algorithm was based on polymorphic sites that exceeded a 10% minor allele frequency (MAF) and a within-bin linkage disequilibrium (LD) exceeding an r2 value of 0.7. Additional missense SNPs were included based on their MAF and functional significance.
QiaAMP DNA Blood and Tissue Mini Kit was used to isolate genomic DNA from whole blood (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). Genotype information was obtained using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (Agena Bioscience, San Diego, CA, USA). SpectroDesigner software (Agena Bioscience) was used to design the multiplex polymerase chain reaction assays and associated extension reactions. Primer extension products were loaded onto a 384-element chip with a nanoliter pipetting system (Agena Bioscience) and analyzed with a MassArray mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bremen, Germany). Mass spectra peak identification was obtained using SpectroTyperRT 4.0 software. Hardy-Weinberg calculations were done to determine genotyping quality control and whether each marker was in the expected allelic population equilibrium. The following SNPs were analyzed for this study, TLR10: rs11466657, rs11466645, rs11466617, rs7660429, rs11725309; TLR1: rs3923647, rs4833095, rs5743595, rs5743594, rs5743582, rs5743580; and TLR6: rs5743827, rs5743815, rs5743795, rs5743788. The polymorphism rs5743810 was excluded from the analysis, because it was not in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.
Statistical Analyses
In a post-hoc power calculation, a sample size of 509 achieves 90% power to detect a change in slope (β) from 0 to 0.25 when the standard deviation (SD) of the independent variable is 0.40, the SD of dependent variable is 0.60, and the two-sided α-level is 0.01, which is Bonferroni adjusted for multiple comparisons.
Due to the skewed nature of IL-6 and TNF-α level, all analyses were conducted on the natural logarithm scale, to meet the normality assumption. Stimulated IL-6 and TNF-α levels were compared by patient characteristics using t-test and ANOVA models. Associations between stimulated IL-6 and TNF-α levels and TLR10, TLR1 and TLR6 polymorphisms were examined utilizing t-tests, assuming a dominant model for the polymorphisms, variances were found to be similar between groups. A combination variable (COPD/smoke) was created to account for both COPD and smoking status in the multivariable models and contained three categories: 1) COPD, 2) no COPD, ever smoker, and 3) no COPD, never smoker. Multivariable linear regression models were used to examine TLR polymorphisms as predictors of IL-6 and TNF-α level, while adjusting for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), education level, race, COPD/smoke and years worked on a farm. Adjustments for multiple comparisons were made using Benjamini Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) methodology (45).
TLR haplotypes were constructed using Haploview software version 4.2 (29) and haplotype blocks were estimated using the confidence interval for r2 values. To select SNPs in the haplotype, we used Haploview Tagger analysis to reduce the number of SNPs included from 15 to 10 using an r2 threshold of 0.8. Considering an r2 threshold of 0.7 gave the same resulting SNPs included in the haplotype as that found for r2 = 0.8. SNPs rs5743580, rs5743595, rs5743580, rs11725309, rs5743795, rs11466617, rs11466645 are all highly correlated and the Tagger analysis indicated that rs5743580 could capture the information contained from the other six SNPs.
The association between IL-6 and TNF-α levels and TLR haplotypes was tested using the R function haplo.glm contained in the R package haplo.stats. Haplo.glm fit univariate and multivariable linear regression of stimulated IL-6 and TNF-α level on haplotype, which allowed for ambiguous haplotypes, interactions and covariates. The model is fit using an iterative two-step expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm, with the posterior probabilities as weights to update the regression coefficients, and the regression coefficients are used to update the posterior probabilities (46). Both multivariable adjusted models and univariate models were considered. Multivariable models were adjusted for age, gender, body mass index, education, race, COPD/smoke and years worked on a farm. Multivariable linear regression models considered an interaction between TLR haplotypes and the COPD/smoke variable; however, none were significant and thus excluded from the final model. All tests were two-sided. Models that do not include haplotype information were fit using SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge our VA Merit funding for this collaboration (VA Merit Awards to TDL (1I01CX000434-01) and DJR), the hard work by the study coordinators Robin Zotti-Pierce, Eric Chickris, Meghan Langel and Kelsey Palm.
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest
None of the authors have any competing financial interests in relation to the work described.
References
- 1.Poole JA, Romberger DJ. Immunological and inflammatory responses to organic dust in agriculture. Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology. 2012;12(2):126–132. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e3283511d0e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Linaker C, Smedley J. Respiratory illness in agricultural workers. Occup Med (Lond) 2002;52(8):451–459. doi: 10.1093/occmed/52.8.451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Von Essen S, Donham K. Illness and injury in animal confinement workers. Occupational Medicine. 1999;14(2):337–350. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Boissy RJ, Romberger DJ, Roughead WA, Weissenburger-Moser L, Poole JA, LeVan TD. Shotgun pyrosequencing metagenomic analyses of dusts from swine confinement and grain facilities. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e95578. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Poole JA, Dooley GP, Saito R, Burrell AM, Bailey KL, Romberger DJ, et al. Muramic acid, endotoxin, 3-hydroxy fatty acids, and ergosterol content explain monocyte and epithelial cell inflammatory responses to agricultural dusts. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 73(10):684–700. doi: 10.1080/15287390903578539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Poole JA, Alexis NE, Parks C, MacInnes AK, Gentry-Nielsen MJ, Fey PD, et al. Repetitive organic dust exposure in vitro impairs macrophage differentiation and function. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;122(2):375–382. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.05.023. 82 e1-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nehme B, Letourneau V, Forster RJ, Veillette M, Duchaine C. Culture-independent approach of the bacterial bioaerosol diversity in the standard swine confinement buildings, and assessment of the seasonal effect. Environmental microbiology. 2008;10(3):665–675. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01489.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.May S, Romberger DJ, Poole JA. Respiratory health effects of large animal farming environments. Journal of toxicology and environmental health Part B, Critical reviews. 2012;15(8):524–541. doi: 10.1080/10937404.2012.744288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lee CC, Avalos AM, Ploegh HL. Accessory molecules for Toll-like receptors and their function. Nature reviews Immunology. 2012;12(3):168–179. doi: 10.1038/nri3151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Akira S, Takeda K, Kaisho T. Toll-like receptors: critical proteins linking innate and acquired immunity. Nature immunology. 2001;2(8):675–680. doi: 10.1038/90609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Georgel P, Macquin C, Bahram S. The heterogeneous allelic repertoire of human toll-like receptor (TLR) genes. PLoS One. 2009;4(11):e7803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Roach JC, Glusman G, Rowen L, Kaur A, Purcell MK, Smith KD, et al. The evolution of vertebrate Toll-like receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(27):9577–9582. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0502272102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhou H, Gu J, Lamont SJ, Gu X. Evolutionary analysis for functional divergence of the toll-like receptor gene family and altered functional constraints. Journal of molecular evolution. 2007;65(2):119–123. doi: 10.1007/s00239-005-0008-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Takeuchi O, Sato S, Horiuchi T, Hoshino K, Takeda K, Dong Z, et al. Cutting edge: role of Toll-like receptor 1 in mediating immune response to microbial lipoproteins. J Immunol. 2002;169(1):10–14. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.1.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Takeuchi O, Kawai T, Muhlradt PF, Morr M, Radolf JD, Zychlinsky A, et al. Discrimination of bacterial lipoproteins by Toll-like receptor 6. International immunology. 2001;13(7):933–940. doi: 10.1093/intimm/13.7.933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Guan Y, Ranoa DR, Jiang S, Mutha SK, Li X, Baudry J, et al. Human TLRs 10 and 1 share common mechanisms of innate immune sensing but not signaling. J Immunol. 2010;184(9):5094–5103. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Okusawa T, Fujita M, Nakamura J, Into T, Yasuda M, Yoshimura A, et al. Relationship between structures and biological activities of mycoplasmal diacylated lipopeptides and their recognition by toll-like receptors 2 and 6. Infect Immun. 2004;72(3):1657–1665. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.3.1657-1665.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Takeuchi O, Hoshino K, Kawai T, Sanjo H, Takada H, Ogawa T, et al. Differential roles of TLR2 and TLR4 in recognition of gram-negative and gram-positive bacterial cell wall components. Immunity. 1999;11(4):443–451. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80119-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Oosting M, Cheng SC, Bolscher JM, Vestering-Stenger R, Plantinga TS, Verschueren IC, et al. Human TLR10 is an anti-inflammatory pattern-recognition receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(42):E4478–E4484. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1410293111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Arbour NC, Lorenz E, Schutte BC, Zabner J, Kline JN, Jones M, et al. TLR4 mutations are associated with endotoxin hyporesponsiveness in humans. Nature Genetics. 2000;25(2):187–191. doi: 10.1038/76048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mikacenic C, Reiner AP, Holden TD, Nickerson DA, Wurfel MM. Variation in the TLR10/TLR1/TLR6 locus is the major genetic determinant of interindividual difference in TLR1/2-mediated responses. Genes and immunity. 2013;14(1):52–57. doi: 10.1038/gene.2012.53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wurfel MM, Gordon AC, Holden TD, Radella F, Strout J, Kajikawa O, et al. Toll-like receptor 1 polymorphisms affect innate immune responses and outcomes in sepsis. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2008;178(7):710–720. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200803-462OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Niebuhr M, Langnickel J, Draing C, Renz H, Kapp A, Werfel T. Dysregulation of toll-like receptor-2 (TLR-2)-induced effects in monocytes from patients with atopic dermatitis: impact of the TLR-2 R753Q polymorphism. Allergy. 2008;63(6):728–734. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01721.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sales ML, Schreiber R, Ferreira-Sae MC, Fernandes MN, Piveta CS, Cipolli JA, et al. Toll-like receptor 6 Ser249Pro polymorphism is associated with lower left ventricular wall thickness and inflammatory response in hypertensive women. American journal of hypertension. 2010;23(6):649–654. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2010.24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Shey MS, Randhawa AK, Bowmaker M, Smith E, Scriba TJ, de Kock M, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in toll-like receptor 6 are associated with altered lipopeptide- and mycobacteria-induced interleukin-6 secretion. Genes and immunity. 2010;11(7):561–572. doi: 10.1038/gene.2010.14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sherry ST, Ward MH, Kholodov M, Baker J, Phan L, Smigielski EM, et al. dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation. Nucleic acids research. 2001;29(1):308–311. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.1.308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Weissenburger-Moser L, Meza J, Yu F, Shiyanbola O, Romberger DJ, LeVan TD. A principal factor analysis to characterize agricultural exposures among Nebraska veterans. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2016 doi: 10.1038/jes.2016.20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Affairs USDoV. National survey of veterans. 2010 Available from: http://wwwvirecresearchvagov.
- 29.Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ. Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(2):263–265. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Imler JL, Hoffmann JA. Toll signaling: the TIReless quest for specificity. Nature immunology. 2003;4(2):105–106. doi: 10.1038/ni0203-105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kormann MS, Depner M, Hartl D, Klopp N, Illig T, Adamski J, et al. Toll-like receptor heterodimer variants protect from childhood asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;122(1):86–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.04.039. e1-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yang CA, Chiang BL. Toll-like receptor 1 N248S polymorphism affects T helper 1 cytokine production and is associated with serum immunoglobulin E levels in Taiwanese allergic patients. Journal of microbiology, immunology, and infection = Wei mian yu gan ran za zhi. 2015 doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2015.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Barreiro LB, Ben-Ali M, Quach H, Laval G, Patin E, Pickrell JK, et al. Evolutionary dynamics of human Toll-like receptors and their different contributions to host defense. PLoS genetics. 2009;5(7):e1000562. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Omueti KO, Mazur DJ, Thompson KS, Lyle EA, Tapping RI. The polymorphism P315L of human toll-like receptor 1 impairs innate immune sensing of microbial cell wall components. J Immunol. 2007;178(10):6387–6394. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.10.6387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Johnson CM, Lyle EA, Omueti KO, Stepensky VA, Yegin O, Alpsoy E, et al. Cutting edge: A common polymorphism impairs cell surface trafficking and functional responses of TLR1 but protects against leprosy. J Immunol. 2007;178(12):7520–7524. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.12.7520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hawn TR, Misch EA, Dunstan SJ, Thwaites GE, Lan NT, Quy HT, et al. A common human TLR1 polymorphism regulates the innate immune response to lipopeptides. Eur J Immunol. 2007;37(8):2280–2289. doi: 10.1002/eji.200737034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Purdue MP, Lan Q, Wang SS, Kricker A, Menashe I, Zheng TZ, et al. A pooled investigation of Toll-like receptor gene variants and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30(2):275–281. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgn262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Veltkamp M, van Moorsel CH, Rijkers GT, Ruven HJ, Grutters JC. Genetic variation in the Toll-like receptor gene cluster (TLR10-TLR1-TLR6) influences disease course in sarcoidosis. Tissue antigens. 2012;79(1):25–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0039.2011.01808.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Stevens VL, Hsing AW, Talbot JT, Zheng SL, Sun J, Chen J, et al. Genetic variation in the toll-like receptor gene cluster (TLR10-TLR1-TLR6) and prostate cancer risk. International journal of cancer. 2008;123(11):2644–2650. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Bank S, Andersen PS, Burisch J, Pedersen N, Roug S, Galsgaard J, et al. Polymorphisms in the Toll-Like Receptor and the IL-23/IL-17 Pathways Were Associated with Susceptibility to Inflammatory Bowel Disease in a Danish Cohort. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0145302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Global Strategy for Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD. 2014 [Google Scholar]
- 42.Brazzale DJ, Hall GL, Pretto JJ. Effects of adopting the new global lung function initiative 2012 reference equations on the interpretation of spirometry. Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases. 2013;86(3):183–189. doi: 10.1159/000352046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Romberger DJ, Bodlak V, Von Essen SG, Mathisen T, Wyatt TA. Hog barn dust extract stimulates IL-8 and IL-6 release in human bronchial epithelial cells via PKC activation. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2002;93(1):289–296. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00815.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Server GV. http://snp.gs.washington.edu/SeattleSeqAnnotation147/HelpAbout.jsp.
- 45.Benjamini Y, Hochbery Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Royal Stat Soc Ser B. 1995;57:289–300. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lake SL, Lyon H, Tantisira K, Silverman EK, Weiss ST, Laird NM, et al. Estimation and tests of haplotype-environment interaction when linkage phase is ambiguous. Human heredity. 2003;55(1):56–65. doi: 10.1159/000071811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

