Abstract
Paenibacillus sp. 598K cycloisomaltooligosaccharide glucanotransferase (CITase), a member of glycoside hydrolase family 66 (GH66), catalyses the intramolecular transglucosylation of dextran to produce CIs with seven or more degrees of polymerization. To clarify the cyclization reaction and product specificity of the enzyme, we determined the crystal structure of PsCITase. The core structure of PsCITase consists of four structural domains: a catalytic (β/α)8-domain and three β-domains. A family 35 carbohydrate-binding module (first CBM35 region of Paenibacillus sp. 598K CITase, (PsCBM35-1)) is inserted into and protrudes from the catalytic domain. The ligand complex structure of PsCITase prepared by soaking the crystal with cycloisomaltoheptaose yielded bound sugars at three sites: in the catalytic cleft, at the joint of the PsCBM35-1 domain and at the loop region of PsCBM35-1. In the catalytic site, soaked cycloisomaltoheptaose was observed as a linear isomaltoheptaose, presumably a hydrolysed product from cycloisomaltoheptaose by the enzyme and occupied subsites –7 to –1. Beyond subsite –7, three glucose moieties of another isomaltooiligosaccharide were observed, and these positions are considered to be distal subsites –13 to –11. The third binding site is the canonical sugar-binding site at the loop region of PsCBM35-1, where the soaked cycloisomaltoheptaose is bound. The structure indicated that the concave surface between the catalytic domain and PsCBM35-1 plays a guiding route for the long-chained substrate at the cyclization reaction.
Keywords: carbohydrate binding modules, cycloisomaltooligosaccharide, crystallography, glycoside hydrolase
Introduction
Cycloisomaltooligosaccharides (CIs) are a cyclic sugar chain consisting of α-1,6-linked glucose molecules [1] and several bacteria have known to produce CIs. CIs with degrees of polymerization of 7–17 (CI-7–CI-17, CI-n: CI with n degrees of polymerization of glucose) were found in Paenibacillus sp. 598K cultures when this bacterium was grown with dextran [2,3]. CIs are strong inhibitors of streptococcal glucansucrases and are expected to be useful for cariostatic food additives [4]. Among CIs, CI-10 was found to show inclusion ability prominently when it was tested by the colour stabilization of Victoria Blue B, suggesting that CI-10 may be useful for stabilizing unstable substances [5].
CI-producing bacteria produce CI glucanotransferase (CITase; EC 2.4.1.248), which catalyses the production of CIs from dextran by intramolecular transglucosylation, and also catalyses disproportionation, coupling and hydrolytic reactions [6]. CITases and some dextranases (EC 3.2.1.11; displaying endo-dextranolytic activity) are classified into the glycoside hydrolase (GH) family 66 (GH66) based on their primary structures [7,8], according to the CAZy database. These enzymes share 20–30% of amino acid sequence identity. GH66 dextranases produce only isomaltooligosaccharides (IGs), whereas CITases produce mainly CIs and small amounts of IGs. Currently, three 3D structures of GH66 enzymes have been determined and the enzymes have a modular protein architecture with a (β/α)8 TIM-barrel as a GH66 catalytic domain and several other β-domains [9–11]. Three domains, the catalytic domain and two β-domains on the N- and C-terminal ends, are conserved in most GH66 enzymes, and all the known CITases have extra β-domains. The crystal structure of CITase from Paenibacillus agaridevorans T-3040 (CITase from P. agaridevorans T-3040 (PaCITase), which was previously known as BcCITase from Bacillus circulans T-3040) revealed that a β-jellyroll domain belonging to the carbohydrate-binding module (CBM) family 35 (CBM35) is inserted in the catalytic domain at the seventh loop of the (β/α)8 TIM-barrel, and this domain protrudes from the catalytic domain and possesses two sugar-binding sites [10]. The first sugar-binding site is located on the variable loop region and recognizes the mid-point glucose molecule of α-1,6-linked glucans. The second site is located at the edge of one β-sheet, recognizing the non-reducing end glucose of α-1,6-linked glucans. The amounts of the different CIs produced by PaCITase follow the order (most to least): CI-8, CI-7, CI-9 and the longer CIs. Crystal structure of PaCITase has revealed that the bound isomaltooctaose (IG-8, IG-n: IG with n degrees of polymerization of glucose) in the catalytic site extends to the second sugar-binding site of CBM35, which acts as subsite –8, representing the enzyme–substrate complex when the enzyme produces CI-8 (Protein Data Bank (PDB) ID: 3WNN). This structure indicates that CBM35 functions to determine the size of the product, causing the predominant production of CI-8 by the enzyme.
Among CI-producing bacteria, the Paenibacillus sp. 598K strain showed good CI production and high CITase activity that was as good as the P. agaridevorans T-3040 strain [2]. Paenibacillus sp. 598K uses CITase (CITase from Paenibacillus sp. 598K (PsCITase)) to synthesize CIs from dextran. When the bacterium produces CIs from starch, it uses another enzyme α-1,6-glucosyltransferase (EC 2.4.1.-) to produce α-1,6-glucosyl-α-glucosaccharides from starch, which are used as substrates for PsCITase [12]. PsCITase is composed of 972 amino acids, which were deduced from the DNA sequence of the cit gene [3]. A domain search indicates that PsCITase has a modular structure consisting of at least five structural domains including two CBM35 domains, first CBM35 region of Paenibacillus sp. 598K CITase (PsCBM35-1) and PsCBM35-2, and the domain arrangement is similar to that of PaCITase. Although these two enzymes show a high sequence identity of 65%, the CI produced in the highest amounts by PaCITase is CI-8, whereas PsCITase produces CI-7 in the highest amount. Since the high CI-8 productivity of PaCITase is attributed to the sugar-binding site in the CBM35-1 domain working as subsite –8, we hypothesize that the structure of PsCBM35-1 might provide clues that clarify the mechanism of product specificity for PsCITase.
In the present study, the crystal structure of PsCITase we determined in its apo- and CI-7 complex forms, and structural differences between the CBM35 domains of PaCITase and PsCITase explain the substrate recognition mechanism of these enzymes that yields different product specificities. The elucidated sugar-binding mechanism of CITases would help in creating the functional enzymes to produce CIs with different polymerization degrees for certain purposes in industrial and material applications.
Materials and methods
Protein expression and crystallization of PsCITase
The expression plasmids coding for the core domain of the cit gene (41-739; N-terminal 40 amino acids and the C-terminal 235 amino acids were truncated) and constructed from the pET15b system (Merck-Novagen, Darmstadt, Germany) was transformed into Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) cells [3]. The cells were grown in LB medium (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) containing 100 μM ampicillin at 37°C. Protein production was induced by the addition of isopropyl β-thiogalactoside to a final concentration of 1 mM followed by incubation of the cells at 25°C overnight. After E. coli cells were disrupted by sonication, PsCITase was purified to homogeneity by nickel-chelating chromatography using a His-Trap Fast Flow 5-ml column (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, U.K.). The purified sample was buffer exchanged and concentrated to 3.0 mg ml−1 by ultrafiltration using an Amicon Ultra-30000 MW membrane (Merck-Millipore, Billerica, MA, U.S.A.), and the concentration was checked during this process using the molar extinction coefficient (ε280 =1.62 × 105 M−1 cm−1).
The protein solution was filtered through a 0.1-µm membrane (Merck-Millipore). PsCITase was crystallized by the sitting-drop vapour diffusion method at 293 K using a precipitant solution consisting of 25% PEG3350 (Hampton Research, Aliso Viejo, CA, U.S.A.) and 12% Tacsimate (Hampton Research), pH 5.0. Rod-type crystals with maximum dimensions of 0.05 × 0.05 × 0.3 mm appeared within a month using 50 μl of the reservoir solution with a drop consisting of 1 μl of protein solution and 1 μl of reservoir solution.
Structure analysis of PsCITase
Diffraction experiments for protein crystals were conducted at the beamline BL-NW12 of the Photon Factory Advanced Ring (PF-AR), High Energy Accelerator Research Organization, Tsukuba, Japan [13]. The crystal was scooped in a nylon cryoloop (0.3 mm, Hampton Research) and then flash-cooled under a nitrogen stream at 95 K. Diffraction data by synchrotron radiation were collected at a wavelength of 1.0000 Å with a Quantum 270 CCD detector (Area Detector Systems Corp., Poway, CA, U.S.A.). The data were integrated and scaled using the programs DENZO and SCALEPACK in the HKL2000 program suite [14]. For the CI-7 complex data, 0.5 μl precipitant solution containing 5% CI-7 was added into the crystal drop for 3 min before data collection.
The crystal structure was determined by the molecular replacement method using the structure of PaCITase (PDB code: 3WNK, [9]) as the template structure using the program MolRep [15] incorporated in the CCP4 program suite [16]. Manual model building and molecular refinement were performed using COOT [17] and REFMAC5 [18]. Data collection and refinement statistics are shown in Table 1. Model stereochemistry was determined with the program RAMGAGE [19]. Structural illustrations were drawn with the program CueMol2 (http://cuemol.sourceforge.jp/en/).
Table 1.
Native PsCITase | PsCITase–CI-7 complex | |
---|---|---|
PDB code | 5X7G | 5X7H |
Data collection | ||
Space group | P3121 | P3121 |
Cell parameters (Å) | a =113.7, b =113.7, c =121.6 | a =112.8, b =112.8, c =122.3 |
X-ray source | PF-AR BL-NW12 | PF-AR BL-NW12 |
Wavelength (Å) | 1.00000 | 1.00000 |
Resolution (Å) | 100–2.2 (2.28–2.20)* | 100–2.6 (2.69–2.60)* |
Number of reflections | 1026298 | 581057 |
Unique reflections | 46942 (4611) | 28297 (2787) |
Completeness (%) | 100.0 (100.0) | 99.9 (100.0) |
Multiplicity | 22.1 (22.1) | 20.5 (19.4) |
R-merge | 0.096 (0.848) | 0.179 (0.922) |
Average I/σ | 32.1 (4.9) | 10.9 (3.3) |
Refinement | ||
Resolution (Å) | 98.5–2.2 (2.26–2.20) | 97.7–2.6 (2.66-2.60) |
R-factor | 0.174 (0.254) | 0.155 (0.255) |
R-free | 0.222 (0.334) | 0.215 (0.306) |
Number of water molecules | 289 | 266 |
Average B-value (Å2) | 45.4 | 44.4 |
r.m.s.d. from ideals | ||
Lengths (Å) | 0.011 | 0.013 |
Angles (°) | 1.43 | 1.64 |
Ramachandran plot (%) (favoured/allowed/disallowed) | 96.1/3.7/0.1 | 95.4/4.4/0.1 |
*Values in parentheses refer to the highest resolution shell; r.m.s.d., root mean square deviation.
Site-directed mutagenesis and enzyme assay of PsCITase
Site-directed mutagenesis was performed by polymerase chain reaction using KOD-plus DNA polymerases (TOYOBO, Osaka, Japan). The template was CITase-598K expression plasmid, which contains the N-terminal His6-tagged full-length cit gene without signal sequence cloned into pET-15b as described before [3]. The primer sets for each mutant are as follows: Y470A, 5′-GAGGGCGCCTATTCGCTTGTCTTCCGCTT-3′ (sense) and 5′-CGAATAGGCGCCCTCCTCCGGTACGGTG-3′ (antisense); W507A, 5′-CCGAGCGCGAGCGCCTGGTCGCACGAGA-3′ (sense) and 5′-CGCTCGCGCTCGGCTGATTTTGGAAC-3′ (antisense); W515A, 5′-AGACGGCGCATCAGGTGTATCTGACGCCAGGCA-3′ (sense) and 5′-CCTGATGCGCCGTCTCGTGCGACCAGG-3′ (antisense); Y519A, 5′-CAGGTGGCTCTGACGCCAGGCACGCAC-3′ (sense) and 5′-CGTCAGAGCCACCTGATGCCACGTCTC-3′ (antisense).
Wild-type and mutant PsCITase were expressed, purified and buffer exchanged as described above. CITase assays were performed by measuring the amounts of CIs produced from dextran as described previously [3]. Reactions were performed with appropriate amounts of enzyme and 2% dextran 40 (Amersham Biosciences) in 50 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.5) at 40°C, and produced CIs that were measured by HPLC system (LC Workstation Class-VP, Shimadzu, Co., Kyoto, Japan) equipped with an evaporative light-scattering detector (ELSD-LT, Shimadzu, Co.) using a TSKgel Amide-80 column (4.6 × 250 mm; Tosoh, Tokyo, Japan) as described recently [20]. The protein concentrations of the purified enzymes were determined by measuring the absorbance at 280 nm with BSA (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.) as the standard.
Results
Overall structure of PsCITase
The crystal structures of core PsCITase and its complex with CI-7 (PsCITase–CI-7 complex) were determined by the molecular replacement method at 2.20 and 2.60 Å resolutions respectively. The crystallographic parameters are shown in Table 1. The structural model includes one protein molecule in the crystallographic asymmetric unit. The N-terminal 20 residues, which are derived from the expression and purification tag originating from the pET-15b vector (Met21–Met40), were not identified because of the lack of electron density. Apart from the sugar and water molecules, one calcium ion and two sodium ions were observed. Some malonate ions were also observed, which were included in the crystallization conditions.
The PsCITase–CI-7 complex structure is shown in Figure 1. The core PsCITase structure is composed of four domains, the catalytic domain and three β-domains. Domain N (Ala41–Ser140) composed of seven β-strands forms an Ig fold. The catalytic domain (Domain A, Asp141–Ile420 and Thr548–Asp614) comprising the (β/α)8-barrel is well conserved in GH66 enzymes. In the catalytic domain, the PsCBM35-1 domain is inserted as domain B (Gly421–Gly547) at the seventh loop of the (β/α)8-barrel. Domain C, positioned at the C-terminal side of the catalytic domain (Pro615–Met738), comprises a β-sandwich structure and is composed of Greek key motifs. After the C-terminal of domain C, one CBM35 domain (CBM35-2) and an extra function – unknown peptide exist in the deduced sequence of the cit gene; however, they have been removed for the stable protein expression [3].
The overall structure is conserved with that of GH66 enzymes (Figures 2 and 3). The Cα-trace of PsCITase superimposed with that of PaCITase (PDB code: 3VMN, 65% amino acid identity [10]) gives an r.m.s.d. of 1.20 Å (Figure 2). When only the catalytic domains were superimposed, the r.m.s.d. resulted to be 0.49 Å, but the other three β-domains were rotated with their hinge region as an origin. In relation to the catalytic domain, the PsCBM35-1 domain was rotated ∼10° in a clockwise direction when compared with that of the CBM35 domain of PaCITase (first CBM35 region of Paenibacillus agaridevorans T-3040 CITase (PaCBM35-1), formerly BcCBM35-1) [10]. Domain rotations were also observed for the N- and C-domains with rotation values of ∼5°. The multivalent domain architecture of CITases appears to yield flexibility between domains, and the concave region between the catalytic domain and CBM35-1 can be used as the substrate-binding groove, as discussed later.
CI-7 complex structure of PsCITase
In the complex structure with CI-7, CI-7 and IGs were observed at three sites (Figures 1 and 4), in the catalytic cleft, at the joint of the PsCBM35-1, and at the loop region of PsCBM35-1.
At the catalytic site, the bound CI-7 was observed as the cleaved linear form like isomaltoheptaose (IG-7) in the catalytic cleft (Figure 4A). Electron density corresponding to seven glucose moieties was observed. The reducing end of the resultant IG-7 was located at subsite –1 and in close proximity to the catalytic residues of PsCITase, Asp309 and Glu381, and the sugar chain elongated into the gap between the catalytic domain and the CBM35-1 domain with a zigzag chain structure owing to the α-1,6 glucosidic linkages. According to the subsite nomenclature for GHs [21], the position of the reducing end glucose is designated as subsite –1, the position of the seven glucose moieties from the reducing end (Glc–1 to Glc–7) are designated as subsites –1 to –7. The four glucose moieties Glc–1 to Glc–4 were located along the catalytic cleft, and occupied four subsites –1 to –4, which is a common structural feature of other GH66-enzymes solved previously [9–11]. Subsites –4 to –7 were located between the catalytic and CBM35-1 domains. Glc–4 was in contact with both domains by polar interactions, whereas Glc–5 was loosely sandwiched by hydrophobic contacts. Glc–6 was stacked by the side chain of Trp515 and hydrogen-bonded by the main chain of the sixth β-strand of CBM35-1 domain. Glc–7 formed a hydrogen bond with the main chain of Phe208 of the catalytic domain. Glc–2 to Glc–7 had the normal 4C1 chair conformation, but the electron density for the Glc–1 was rather ambiguous and Glc–1 was refined to have an unusual E3 conformation [22].
A short IG was found between the catalytic and CBM35-1 domains, besides the aforementioned IG-7 (Figure 4B). Three glucose moieties were observed, but two of them from the non-reducing end had ambiguous electron density. The main interaction involved hydrogen bonds between the reducing-end glucose and Glu159, Glu573 Asp574 and Arg586 side chains of the catalytic domain and the side chain of Tyr470 of the CBM35-1 domain. The non-reducing end glucose was stacked on the side chain of Tyr519. This sugar chain may form part of the hydrolysed product of CI-7 by the active enzymes.
The third bound ligand was observed in the canonical sugar-binding site of the CBM35-1 domain (Figure 4C), as observed previously in the PaCITase–ligand complex [10]. The manner in which the sugar binds is mostly conserved between PsCITase and PaCITase. The bound sugar appeared to be soaked CI-7 with the cyclic sugar chain structure, but the electron density was partly ambiguous because the bound sugar ligand was located on the two-fold axis of the crystal. One CI-7 molecule was bound between the two-fold symmetry related two molecules and Trp507 from both molecules stacked two glucose moieties of the bound CI-7. However, the CI-7 molecule did not have two-fold symmetry in its structure; the bound structure took multimodal conformations. The electron density was averaged by the symmetry between the multimodal conformations and this resulted in indistinct density. The Trp507 side chain functioned as a platform for stacking interactions and the surrounding residues formed hydrogen-bonding interactions. These interactions provided the binding site specific to the mid-point glucose of the α-1,6-glucosyl linkage.
To investigate the role of the sugar-binding site of PsCITase, four mutants that changed the aromatic side chains at the sugar-binding sites of PsCBM35-1 were prepared. The mutants were W515A (subsite –6), Y470A, Y519A (these two residues were in the concave between the catalytic domain and CBM35-1) and W507A (canonical sugar-binding site of CBM35-1). As shown in Figure 5, the CI-production pattern by these mutants was measured using dextran 40 as a substrate. Overall CI production of the W507A and W515A mutants was reduced approximately by 25 and 65% comparing with the wild-type enzyme respectively, whilethat of Y470A and Y519A retained the activity. All the mutants mainly produced CI-7 and showed the same characteristics with wild-type enzyme.
Discussion
The obtained structure of the protein–sugar complex was prepared by soaking CI-7 into the crystal drop. The expected structure of the complex should have contained the docked cyclic IGs in the catalytic site. However, the hydrolysed linear IGs were present in the structure, enabling us to identify the subsites from the catalytic site to the CBM35-1. The identified subsites indicated that the concave region formed by the catalytic domain and CBM35-1 supply the substrate-binding site for dextran, the long chain substrate.
The PsCITase–CI-7 complex structure and the PaCITase–IG-8 complex structure [10] both showed that the sugar chains dock from the catalytic site to the CBM35-1 domain; however, the manner in which the sugar binds at the conserved tryptophan, Trp515 in PsCITase and Trp514 in PaCITase, in the CBM35-1 domain differed (Figure 6). In PsCITase, the Trp515 side chain provides the platform for parallel stacking on the glucose moiety as subsite −6 and recognizes the mid-point glucose moiety of the α-1,6-glucan. The C1-and C6-hydroxyl groups of the bound glucose moiety were positioned at both sides of the platform to form α-1,6-glucosyl bonds with the adjacent glucose moieties (Figure 6A). On the other hand, the PaCITase Trp514 side chain participates by forming the side wall of the binding pocket, which functions as subsite –8, along with the PaCITase Tyr499 and Phe501 residues, and the C6-hydroxyl group of the bound glucose moiety is buried at the bottom of the pocket, concomitantly expressing the terminal-binding mode (Figure 6B). The surface drawing of the binding sites demonstrates that the subsite –6 of PsCITase is shaped like a narrow cleft, whereas the subsite –8 of PaCITase is shaped like a shallow pocket. The non-conserved amino acids, Pro500, Gln502, Ile497 and His516, of PsCITase contribute to the glucose-binding mode.
Comparison of the IG structures docked in these two enzymes also showed that the subsite location from –1 to –4 are conserved in these enzymes, but the subsite positions from subsite –5 to −8 differ (Figure 6). The different positions at subsite –5 might be caused by substitution of the amino acid at Gln502. In PaCITase, the bulky Phe501 side chain in PaCITase forms the sugar-binding pocket and creates steric hindrance. Thus, the IG-8 sugar chain binds in a manner that circumvents Phe501. On the other hand, the Gln502 side chain of PsCITase adopts a conformation that enables a shortcut for the substrate to bind between the catalytic site and the binding site at Trp515. This different conformation of Gln502 means that the conserved Trp515 of PsCITase forms the proximal subsite −6, whereas PaCITase Trp514 is involved in subsite −8. Thus, the different product specificity of these two CITases could be attributed to the structural difference at the second sugar-binding site of CBM35-1. Since PsCITase does not have the terminal-binding subsite –8, PsCITase does not produce CI-8 predominantly, but produces CIs with degrees of polymerization of seven or higher, with the polymerization degree seven being the main product by PsCITase and higher polymerization degrees being produced at lower amounts as the polymerization length increases. The alanine mutation on Trp515 did not affect the product specificity of the enzyme but reduced the overall production of CIs, and Trp515 appeared to function as a component of substrate-binding cleft for the long substrate.
In the direction beyond the subsite −7, three glucose moieties, which appeared to be a part of IGs produced by hydrolysis of soaked CI-7, were observed. The α-anomeric hydroxyl group of the reducing-end glucose that is located at the inner position of the concave is directed towards Glc–7 of the docked IG-7. No electron density was observed between the two IG sugar chains, but the concave seemed wide enough for IGs to cover both docked sugar chains. The distance between the Glc–7-O6 atom and the reducing end O1 atom of the docked sugar chains was ∼12 Å, and at least three glucose molecules might be necessary to link the two docked sugar chains, indicating that the positions of the newly found three glucose moieties corresponded subsites –11 to –13. Although these sites did not affect CI productivity and size specificity of the enzyme, the concave region between the catalytic and PsCBM35-1 domains appears to be a good guide route for a substrate with a long sugar chain, such as dextran, to access the catalytic site.
In our previous study on PaCITase, we succeeded in producing engineered PaCITase mutants that produce large amount of CIs with higher degrees of polymerization by introducing mutations around the IG-binding subsites [20]. The success in this mutational study indicates that the mutations might enable us to change the degrees of polymerization of the CIs produced for particular purposes. CIs form inclusion complexes and this depends on the degrees of polymerization. Production of CIs of certain degrees of polymerization should facilitate formation of chemical-inclusion complexes and based on structural data of these enzymes, the required CIs may be produced by particular CITase mutants.
CBMs are usually small domains and more than 30 CBM families adopt a β-sandwich fold. In the CBMs comprising the β-sandwich structure, sugar-binding sites are located mainly at two sites: the major site is termed the variable loop site and is located on the tip of the β-turn, whereas the other binding site is located on the surface of the concave β-sheet and is termed the concaved face site [23]. CBM35s adopt a conserved β-sandwich structure with a β-jellyroll motif and one conserved calcium-binding site. However, CBM35s show variable ligand specificity and are classified into four major subfamilies I–IV based on their ligand specificities [24], and the representative sugar binding occurs at the variable loop site. PsCBM35-1 and PaCBM35-1 have conserved first sites that bind to the mid-point glucose of the α-1,6-glucan, and are grouped into the subfamily III, that recognizes glucosyl oligosaccharides. The role of the first site of PsCBM35-1 is substrate binding to increase catalytic efficiency. The W507A mutant showed a certain decrease in CI production. On the other hand, the second binding site of PsCBM35-1 was located at the side of two β-sheets and is not part of the concave face site. In this case, the second site in PsCBM35-1 could be considered a lateral edge site. At this second site, PsCITase recognizes the mid-point glucose of substrate, long substrate chains like dextran and supports the cyclizing reaction of the enzyme by guiding the substrate to the catalytic site.
We have determined the crystal structure of PsCITase, elucidating IG-binding mode at the catalytic site and PsCBM35-1. Two sugar-binding sites in PsCBM35-1 did not affect size specificity of the produced CIs, but enhanced the total CI production of the enzyme. The concave between the catalytic domain and PsCBM35-1 appeared to be a guiding route for the long-chained substrate. The information obtained here provides the structural basis for enzymatic improvement of PsCITase.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by the Scientific Technique Research Promotion Program for Agriculture, Forestry, Fisheries and Food Industry (Japan). We thank the beamline researchers and staff at the Photon Factory.
Abbreviations
- GH
glycoside hydrolase
- GH66
glycoside hydrolase family 66
- CBM
carbohydrate-binding module
- CBM35
carbohydrate-binding module family 35
- CI
cycloisomaltooligosaccharide
- CI-n
cycloisomaltooligosaccharide with n degrees of polymerization of glucose
- CITase
cycloisomaltooligosaccharide glucanotransferase
- IG
isomaltooligosaccharide
- IG-n
isomaltooligosaccharide with n degrees of polymerization of glucose
- PaCBM35-1
first CBM35 region of P. agaridevorans T-3040 CITase
- PaCITase
CITase from P. agaridevorans T-3040
- PDB
Protein Data Bank
- PsCBM35-1
first CBM35 region of Paenibacillus sp. 598K CITase
- PsCITase
CITase from Paenibacillus sp. 598K
- r.m.s.d.
root mean square deviation (difference)
Author contribution
Z.F. and K.F. conceived and designed the study. R.S., D.M., M.M., N.K. and K.F. performed the enzyme preparation and biochemical experiments. N.S., N.K., M.M. and Z.F. performed crystallization and structural analysis. K.K. provided critical comments for preparation of the paper. Z.F. and K.F. wrote the paper.
Funding
This work was supported by the Program for Promotion of Basic and Applied Researches for Innovations in Bio-oriented Industry [grant number 25001A]; and the Scientific Technique Research Promotion Program for Agriculture, Forestry, Fisheries and Food Industry [grant number 26062B].
Competing interests
The authors declare that there are no competing interests associated with the manuscript.
Footnotes
The atomic co-ordinates for the sugar-free PsCITase and its complexes with CI-7 have been deposited in the PDB (http://www.pdb.org/) under code 5X7G and 5X7H.
References
- 1.Oguma T., Horiuchi T. and Kobayashi M. (1993) Novel cyclic dextrans, cycloisomaltooligosaccharides, from Bacillus sp. T-3040 culture. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 57, 1225–1227 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Funane K., Terasawa K., Mizuno Y., Ono H., Gibu S., Tokashiki T. et al. (2008) Isolation of Bacillus and Paenibacillus bacterial strains that produce large molecules of cyclic isomaltooligosaccharides. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 72, 3277–3280 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Suzuki R., Terasawa K., Kimura K., Fujimoto Z., Momma M., Kobayashi M. et al. (2012) Biochemical characterization of a novel cycloisomaltooligosaccharide glucanotransferase from Paenibacillus sp. 598K. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1824, 919–924 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kobayashi M., Funane K. and Oguma T. (1995) Inhibition of dextran and mutan synthesis by cycloisomaltooligosaccharides. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 59, 1861–1865 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Funane K., Terasawa K., Mizuno Y., Ono H., Miyagi T., Gibu S. et al. (2007) A novel cyclic isomaltooligosaccharide (cycloisomaltodecaose, CI-10) produced by Bacillus circulans T-3040 displays remarkable inclusion ability compared with cyclodextrins. J. Biotechnol. 130, 188–192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Oguma T., Kurokawa T., Tobe K. and Kobayashi M. (1995) Cloning and sequence analysis of the cycloisomaltooligosaccharide glucanotransferase gene from Bacillus ciyculans T-3040 and expression in Escherichia coli cells. J. Appl. Glycosci. 42, 415–419 [Google Scholar]
- 7.Henrissat B. and Bairoch A. (1996) Updating the sequence-based classification of glycosyl hydrolases. Biochem. J. 316, 695–696 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cantarel B.L., Coutinho P.M., Rancurel C., Bernard T., Lombard V. and Henrissat B. (2009) The Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes database (CAZy): an expert resource for Glycogenomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D233–D238 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Suzuki N., Kim Y.-M., Fujimoto Z., Momma M., Okuyama M., Mori H. et al. (2012) Structural elucidation of dextran degradation mechanism by Streptococcus mutans dextranase belonging to glycoside hydrolase family 66. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 19916–19926 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Suzuki N., Fujimoto Z., Kim Y.M., Momma M., Kishine N., Suzuki R. et al. (2014) Structural elucidation of the cyclization mechanism of α-1,6-glucan by Bacillus circulans T-3040 cycloisomaltooligosaccharide glucanotransferase. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 12040–12051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Suzuki N., Kishine N., Fujimoto Z., Sakurai M., Momma M., Ko J.-A. et al. (2016) Crystal structure of thermophilic dextranase from Thermoanaerobacter pseudethanolicus. J. Biochem. 159, 331–339 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ichinose H., Suzuki R., Miyazaki T., Kimura K., Momma M., Suzuki N. et al. (2017) Paenibacillus sp. 598K 6-α-glucosyltransferase is essential for cycloisomaltooligosaccharide synthesis from α-(1→4)-glucan. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 10.1007/s00253-017-8174-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chavas L.M., Matsugaki N., Yamada Y., Hiraki M., Igarashi N., Suzuki M. et al. (2012) Beamline AR-NW12A: high-throughput beamline for macromolecular crystallography at the Photon Factory. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 19, 450–454 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Otwinowski Z. and Minor W. (1997) Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 276, 307–326 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Vagin A. and Teplyakov A. (2010) Molecular replacement with MOLREP. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 22–25 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Winn M.D., Ballard C.C., Cowtan K.D., Dodson E.J., Emsley P., Evans P.R. et al. (2011) Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 235–242 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Emsley P. and Cowtan K. (2004) Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126–2132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Murshudov G.N., Skubák P., Lebedev A.A., Pannu N.S., Steiner R.A., Nicholls R.A. et al. (2011) REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 355–367 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lovell S.C., Davis I.W., Arendall W.B. III, de Bakker P.I., Word J.M., Prisant M.G. et al. (2003) Structure validation by Cα geometry: φ, ψ and Cβ deviation. Proteins 50, 437–450 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Suzuki R., Suzuki N., Fujimoto Z., Momma M., Kimura K., Kitamura S. et al. (2015) Molecular engineering of cycloisomaltooligosaccharide glucanotransferase from Bacillus circulans T-3040: structural determinants for the reaction product size and reactivity. Biochem. J. 467, 259–270 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Davies G.J., Wilson K.S. and Henrissat B. (1997) Nomenclature for sugar-binding subsites in glycosyl hydrolases. Biochem. J. 321, 557–559 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cremer D. and Pople J.A. (1975) General definition of ring puckering coordinates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 97, 1354–1358 [Google Scholar]
- 23.Abbott D.W. and van Bueren A.L. (2014) Using structure to inform carbohydrate binding module function. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 28, 32–40 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Correia M.A., Abbott D.W., Gloster T.M., Fernandes V.O., Prates J.A., Montanier C. et al. (2010) Signature active site architectures illuminate the molecular basis for ligand specificity in family 35 carbohydrate binding module. Biochemistry 49, 6193–6205 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]