Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2017 Apr 10;77(4):224. doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4744-6

Search for massive long-lived particles decaying semileptonically in the LHCb detector

R Aaij 40, B Adeva 39, M Adinolfi 48, Z Ajaltouni 5, S Akar 6, J Albrecht 10, F Alessio 40, M Alexander 53, S Ali 43, G Alkhazov 31, P Alvarez Cartelle 55, A A Alves Jr 59, S Amato 2, S Amerio 23, Y Amhis 7, L An 41, L Anderlini 18, G Andreassi 41, M Andreotti 17, J E Andrews 60, R B Appleby 56, F Archilli 43, P d’Argent 12, J Arnau Romeu 6, A Artamonov 37, M Artuso 61, E Aslanides 6, G Auriemma 26, M Baalouch 5, I Babuschkin 56, S Bachmann 12, J J Back 50, A Badalov 38, C Baesso 62, S Baker 55, W Baldini 17, R J Barlow 56, C Barschel 40, S Barsuk 7, W Barter 40, M Baszczyk 27, V Batozskaya 29, B Batsukh 61, V Battista 41, A Bay 41, L Beaucourt 4, J Beddow 53, F Bedeschi 24, I Bediaga 1, L J Bel 43, V Bellee 41, N Belloli 21, K Belous 37, I Belyaev 32, E Ben-Haim 8, G Bencivenni 19, S Benson 43, J Benton 48, A Berezhnoy 33, R Bernet 42, A Bertolin 23, C Betancourt 42, F Betti 15, M-O Bettler 40, M van Beuzekom 43, Ia Bezshyiko 42, S Bifani 47, P Billoir 8, T Bird 56, A Birnkraut 10, A Bitadze 56, A Bizzeti 18, T Blake 50, F Blanc 41, J Blouw 11, S Blusk 61, V Bocci 26, T Boettcher 58, A Bondar 36, N Bondar 31,40, W Bonivento 16, I Bordyuzhin 32, A Borgheresi 21, S Borghi 56, M Borisyak 35, M Borsato 39, F Bossu 7, M Boubdir 9, T J V Bowcock 54, E Bowen 42, C Bozzi 17,40, S Braun 12, M Britsch 12, T Britton 61, J Brodzicka 56, E Buchanan 48, C Burr 56, A Bursche 2, J Buytaert 40, S Cadeddu 16, R Calabrese 17, M Calvi 21, M Calvo Gomez 38, A Camboni 38, P Campana 19, D H Campora Perez 40, L Capriotti 56, A Carbone 15, G Carboni 25, R Cardinale 20, A Cardini 16, P Carniti 21, L Carson 52, K Carvalho Akiba 2, G Casse 54, L Cassina 21, L Castillo Garcia 41, M Cattaneo 40, Ch Cauet 10, G Cavallero 20, R Cenci 24, D Chamont 7, M Charles 8, Ph Charpentier 40, G Chatzikonstantinidis 47, M Chefdeville 4, S Chen 56, S-F Cheung 57, V Chobanova 39, M Chrzaszcz 27,42, X Cid Vidal 39, G Ciezarek 43, P E L Clarke 52, M Clemencic 40, H V Cliff 49, J Closier 40, V Coco 59, J Cogan 6, E Cogneras 5, V Cogoni 16,40, L Cojocariu 30, G Collazuol 23, P Collins 40, A Comerma-Montells 12, A Contu 40, A Cook 48, G Coombs 40, S Coquereau 38, G Corti 40, M Corvo 17, C M Costa Sobral 50, B Couturier 40, G A Cowan 52, D C Craik 52, A Crocombe 50, M Cruz Torres 62, S Cunliffe 55, R Currie 55, C D’Ambrosio 40, F Da Cunha Marinho 2, E Dall’Occo 43, J Dalseno 48, P N Y David 43, A Davis 59, O De Aguiar Francisco 2, K De Bruyn 6, S De Capua 56, M De Cian 12, J M De Miranda 1, L De Paula 2, M De Serio 14, P De Simone 19, C-T Dean 53, D Decamp 4, M Deckenhoff 10, L Del Buono 8, M Demmer 10, A Dendek 28, D Derkach 35, O Deschamps 5, F Dettori 40, B Dey 22, A Di Canto 40, H Dijkstra 40, F Dordei 40, M Dorigo 41, A Dosil Suárez 39, A Dovbnya 45, K Dreimanis 54, L Dufour 43, G Dujany 56, K Dungs 40, P Durante 40, R Dzhelyadin 37, A Dziurda 40, A Dzyuba 31, N Déléage 4, S Easo 51, M Ebert 52, U Egede 55, V Egorychev 32, S Eidelman 36, S Eisenhardt 52, U Eitschberger 10, R Ekelhof 10, L Eklund 53, S Ely 61, S Esen 12, H M Evans 49, T Evans 57, A Falabella 15, N Farley 47, S Farry 54, R Fay 54, D Fazzini 21, D Ferguson 52, A Fernandez Prieto 39, F Ferrari 15,40, F Ferreira Rodrigues 2, M Ferro-Luzzi 40, S Filippov 34, R A Fini 14, M Fiore 17, M Fiorini 17, M Firlej 28, C Fitzpatrick 41, T Fiutowski 28, F Fleuret 7, K Fohl 40, M Fontana 16,40, F Fontanelli 20, D C Forshaw 61, R Forty 40, V Franco Lima 54, M Frank 40, C Frei 40, J Fu 22, W Funk 40, E Furfaro 25, C Färber 40, A Gallas Torreira 39, D Galli 15, S Gallorini 23, S Gambetta 52, M Gandelman 2, P Gandini 57, Y Gao 3, L M Garcia Martin 69, J García Pardiñas 39, J Garra Tico 49, L Garrido 38, P J Garsed 49, D Gascon 38, C Gaspar 40, L Gavardi 10, G Gazzoni 5, D Gerick 12, E Gersabeck 12, M Gersabeck 56, T Gershon 50, Ph Ghez 4, S Gianì 41, V Gibson 49, O G Girard 41, L Giubega 30, K Gizdov 52, V V Gligorov 8, D Golubkov 32, A Golutvin 40,55, A Gomes 1, I V Gorelov 33, C Gotti 21, M Grabalosa Gándara 5, R Graciani Diaz 38, L A Granado Cardoso 40, E Graugés 38, E Graverini 42, G Graziani 18, A Grecu 30, P Griffith 47, L Grillo 21,40, B R Gruberg Cazon 57, O Grünberg 67, E Gushchin 34, Yu Guz 37, T Gys 40, C Göbel 62, T Hadavizadeh 57, C Hadjivasiliou 5, G Haefeli 41, C Haen 40, S C Haines 49, S Hall 55, B Hamilton 60, X Han 12, S Hansmann-Menzemer 12, N Harnew 57, S T Harnew 48, J Harrison 56, M Hatch 40, J He 63, T Head 41, A Heister 9, K Hennessy 54, P Henrard 5, L Henry 8, E van Herwijnen 40, M Heß 67, A Hicheur 2, D Hill 57, C Hombach 56, H Hopchev 41, W Hulsbergen 43, T Humair 55, M Hushchyn 35, N Hussain 57, D Hutchcroft 54, M Idzik 28, P Ilten 58, R Jacobsson 40, A Jaeger 12, J Jalocha 57, E Jans 43, A Jawahery 60, F Jiang 3, M John 57, D Johnson 40, C R Jones 49, C Joram 40, B Jost 40, N Jurik 57, S Kandybei 45, W Kanso 6, M Karacson 40, J M Kariuki 48, S Karodia 53, M Kecke 12, M Kelsey 61, M Kenzie 49, T Ketel 44, E Khairullin 35, B Khanji 12, C Khurewathanakul 41, T Kirn 9, S Klaver 56, K Klimaszewski 29, S Koliiev 46, M Kolpin 12, I Komarov 41, R F Koopman 44, P Koppenburg 43, A Kosmyntseva 32, A Kozachuk 33, M Kozeiha 5, L Kravchuk 34, K Kreplin 12, M Kreps 50, P Krokovny 36, F Kruse 10, W Krzemien 29, W Kucewicz 27, M Kucharczyk 27, V Kudryavtsev 36, A K Kuonen 41, K Kurek 29, T Kvaratskheliya 32,40, D Lacarrere 40, G Lafferty 56, A Lai 16, G Lanfranchi 19, C Langenbruch 9, T Latham 50, C Lazzeroni 47, R Le Gac 6, J van Leerdam 43, A Leflat 33,40, J Lefrançois 7, R Lefèvre 5, F Lemaitre 40, E Lemos Cid 39, O Leroy 6, T Lesiak 27, B Leverington 12, T Li 3, Y Li 7, T Likhomanenko 35,68, R Lindner 40, C Linn 40, F Lionetto 42, X Liu 3, D Loh 50, I Longstaff 53, J H Lopes 2, D Lucchesi 23, M Lucio Martinez 39, H Luo 52, A Lupato 23, E Luppi 17, O Lupton 57, A Lusiani 24, X Lyu 63, F Machefert 7, F Maciuc 30, O Maev 31, K Maguire 56, S Malde 57, A Malinin 68, T Maltsev 36, G Manca 7, G Mancinelli 6, P Manning 61, J Maratas 5, J F Marchand 4, U Marconi 15, C Marin Benito 38, P Marino 24, J Marks 12, G Martellotti 26, M Martin 6, M Martinelli 41, D Martinez Santos 39, F Martinez Vidal 69, D Martins Tostes 2, L M Massacrier 7, A Massafferri 1, R Matev 40, A Mathad 50, Z Mathe 40, C Matteuzzi 21, A Mauri 42, B Maurin 41, A Mazurov 47, M McCann 55, J McCarthy 47, A McNab 56, R McNulty 13, B Meadows 59, F Meier 10, M Meissner 12, D Melnychuk 29, M Merk 43, A Merli 22, E Michielin 23, D A Milanes 66, M-N Minard 4, D S Mitzel 12, A Mogini 8, J Molina Rodriguez 1, I A Monroy 66, S Monteil 5, M Morandin 23, P Morawski 28, A Mordà 6, M J Morello 24, J Moron 28, A B Morris 52, R Mountain 61, F Muheim 52, M Mulder 43, M Mussini 15, B Muster 41, D Müller 56, J Müller 10, K Müller 42, V Müller 10, P Naik 48, T Nakada 41, R Nandakumar 51, A Nandi 57, I Nasteva 2, M Needham 52, N Neri 22, S Neubert 12, N Neufeld 40, M Neuner 12, T D Nguyen 41, C Nguyen-Mau 41, S Nieswand 9, R Niet 10, N Nikitin 33, T Nikodem 12, A Novoselov 37, D P O’Hanlon 50, A Oblakowska-Mucha 28, V Obraztsov 37, S Ogilvy 19, R Oldeman 16, C J G Onderwater 70, J M Otalora Goicochea 2, A Otto 40, P Owen 42, A Oyanguren 69, P R Pais 41, A Palano 14, F Palombo 22, M Palutan 19, J Panman 40, A Papanestis 51, M Pappagallo 14, L L Pappalardo 17, W Parker 60, C Parkes 56, G Passaleva 18, A Pastore 14, G D Patel 54, M Patel 55, C Patrignani 15, A Pearce 51,56, A Pellegrino 43, G Penso 26, M Pepe Altarelli 40, S Perazzini 40, P Perret 5, L Pescatore 47, K Petridis 48, A Petrolini 20, A Petrov 68, M Petruzzo 22, E Picatoste Olloqui 38, B Pietrzyk 4, M Pikies 27, D Pinci 26, A Pistone 20, A Piucci 12, S Playfer 52, M Plo Casasus 39, T Poikela 40, F Polci 8, A Poluektov 36,50, I Polyakov 61, E Polycarpo 2, G J Pomery 48, A Popov 37, D Popov 11,40, B Popovici 30, S Poslavskii 37, C Potterat 2, E Price 48, J D Price 54, J Prisciandaro 39,40, A Pritchard 54, C Prouve 48, V Pugatch 46, A Puig Navarro 42, G Punzi 24, W Qian 57, R Quagliani 7,48, B Rachwal 27, J H Rademacker 48, M Rama 24, M Ramos Pernas 39, M S Rangel 2, I Raniuk 45, F Ratnikov 35, G Raven 44, F Redi 55, S Reichert 10, A C dos Reis 1, C Remon Alepuz 69, V Renaudin 7, S Ricciardi 51, S Richards 48, M Rihl 40, K Rinnert 54, V Rives Molina 38, P Robbe 7,40, A B Rodrigues 1, E Rodrigues 59, J A Rodriguez Lopez 66, P Rodriguez Perez 56, A Rogozhnikov 35, S Roiser 40, A Rollings 57, V Romanovskiy 37, A Romero Vidal 39, J W Ronayne 13, M Rotondo 19, M S Rudolph 61, T Ruf 40, P Ruiz Valls 69, J J Saborido Silva 39, E Sadykhov 32, N Sagidova 31, B Saitta 16, V Salustino Guimaraes 1, C Sanchez Mayordomo 69, B Sanmartin Sedes 39, R Santacesaria 26, C Santamarina Rios 39, M Santimaria 19, E Santovetti 25, A Sarti 19, C Satriano 26, A Satta 25, D M Saunders 48, D Savrina 32,33, S Schael 9, M Schellenberg 10, M Schiller 53, H Schindler 40, M Schlupp 10, M Schmelling 11, T Schmelzer 10, B Schmidt 40, O Schneider 41, A Schopper 40, K Schubert 10, M Schubiger 41, M-H Schune 7, R Schwemmer 40, B Sciascia 19, A Sciubba 26, A Semennikov 32, A Sergi 47, N Serra 42, J Serrano 6, L Sestini 23, P Seyfert 21, M Shapkin 37, I Shapoval 45, Y Shcheglov 31, T Shears 54, L Shekhtman 36, V Shevchenko 68, B G Siddi 17,40, R Silva Coutinho 42, L Silva de Oliveira 2, G Simi 23, S Simone 14, M Sirendi 49, N Skidmore 48, T Skwarnicki 61, E Smith 55, I T Smith 52, J Smith 49, M Smith 55, H Snoek 43, l Soares Lavra 1, M D Sokoloff 59, F J P Soler 53, B Souza De Paula 2, B Spaan 10, P Spradlin 53, S Sridharan 40, F Stagni 40, M Stahl 12, S Stahl 40, P Stefko 41, S Stefkova 55, O Steinkamp 42, S Stemmle 12, O Stenyakin 37, S Stevenson 57, S Stoica 30, S Stone 61, B Storaci 42, S Stracka 24, M Straticiuc 30, U Straumann 42, L Sun 64, W Sutcliffe 55, K Swientek 28, V Syropoulos 44, M Szczekowski 29, T Szumlak 28, S T’Jampens 4, A Tayduganov 6, T Tekampe 10, M Teklishyn 7, G Tellarini 17, F Teubert 40, E Thomas 40, J van Tilburg 43, M J Tilley 55, V Tisserand 4, M Tobin 41, S Tolk 49, L Tomassetti 17, D Tonelli 40, S Topp-Joergensen 57, F Toriello 61, E Tournefier 4, S Tourneur 41, K Trabelsi 41, M Traill 53, M T Tran 41, M Tresch 42, A Trisovic 40, A Tsaregorodtsev 6, P Tsopelas 43, A Tully 49, N Tuning 43, A Ukleja 29, A Ustyuzhanin 35, U Uwer 12, C Vacca 16, V Vagnoni 15,40, A Valassi 40, S Valat 40, G Valenti 15, A Vallier 7, R Vazquez Gomez 19, P Vazquez Regueiro 39, S Vecchi 17, M van Veghel 43, J J Velthuis 48, M Veltri 18, G Veneziano 57, A Venkateswaran 61, M Vernet 5, M Vesterinen 12, B Viaud 7, D Vieira 1, M Vieites Diaz 39, H Viemann 67, X Vilasis-Cardona 38, M Vitti 49, V Volkov 33, A Vollhardt 42, B Voneki 40, A Vorobyev 31, V Vorobyev 36, C Voß 7, J A de Vries 43, C Vázquez Sierra 39, R Waldi 67, C Wallace 50, R Wallace 13, J Walsh 24, J Wang 61, D R Ward 49, H M Wark 54, N K Watson 47, D Websdale 55, A Weiden 42, M Whitehead 40, J Wicht 50, G Wilkinson 40,57, M Wilkinson 61, M Williams 40, M P Williams 47, M Williams 58, T Williams 47, F F Wilson 51, J Wimberley 60, J Wishahi 10, W Wislicki 29, M Witek 27, G Wormser 7, S A Wotton 49, K Wraight 53, K Wyllie 40, Y Xie 65, Z Xing 61, Z Xu 41, Z Yang 3, Y Yao 61, H Yin 65, J Yu 65, X Yuan 36, O Yushchenko 37, K A Zarebski 47, M Zavertyaev 11, L Zhang 3, Y Zhang 7, Y Zhang 63, A Zhelezov 12, Y Zheng 63, X Zhu 3, V Zhukov 9, S Zucchelli 15; LHCb Collaboration71
PMCID: PMC5408995  PMID: 28515664

Abstract

A search is presented for massive long-lived particles decaying into a muon and two quarks. The dataset consists of proton-proton interactions at centre-of-mass energies of 7 and 8 TeV, corresponding to integrated luminosities of 1 and 2fb-1, respectively. The analysis is performed assuming a set of production mechanisms with simple topologies, including the production of a Higgs-like particle decaying into two long-lived particles. The mass range from 20 to 80 GeV/c2 and lifetimes from 5 to 100ps are explored. Results are also interpreted in terms of neutralino production in different R-Parity violating supersymmetric models, with masses in the 23–198 GeV/c2 range. No excess above the background expectation is observed and upper limits are set on the production cross-section for various points in the parameter space of theoretical models.

Introduction

Supersymmetry (SUSY) is one of the most popular extensions of the Standard Model, which solves the hierarchy problem, can unify the gauge couplings and could provide dark matter candidates. The minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM) is the simplest phenomenologically viable realization of SUSY [1, 2]. The present study focuses on a subset of models featuring massive long-lived particles (LLP) with a measurable flight distance [3, 4]. LLP searches have been performed by Tevatron and LHC experiments [512], often using the Hidden Valley framework [4] as a benchmark model (see also the study of Ref. [13]). The LHCb detector probes the forward rapidity region which is only partially covered by the other LHC experiments, and triggers on particles with low transverse momenta, which allows the experiment to explore relatively small LLP masses.

In this paper a search for massive long-lived particles is presented, using proton-proton collision data collected by the LHCb detector at s=7 and 8 TeV, corresponding to integrated luminosities of 1 and 2 fb-1, respectively. The event topology considered in this study is a displaced vertex with several tracks including a high pT muon. This topology is found in the context of the minimal super-gravity (mSUGRA) realisation of the MSSM, with R-parity violation [14], in which the neutralino can decay into a muon and two jets. Neutralinos can be produced by a variety of processes. In this paper four simple production mechanisms with representative topologies and kinematics are considered, with the assumed LLP mass in the range 20–80 GeV/c2. The LLP lifetime range considered is 5–100ps, i.e. larger than the typical b-hadron lifetime. It corresponds to an average flight distance of up to 30cm, well inside the LHCb vertex detector. One of the production mechanisms considered in detail is the decay into two LLPs of a Higgs-like particle with an assumed mass between 50 and 130 GeV/c2, i.e. in a range which includes the mass of the scalar boson discovered by the ATLAS and CMS experiments [15, 16]. In addition, inclusive analyses are performed assuming the full set of neutralino production mechanisms available in Pythia  6 [17]. In this case the LLP mass explored is in the range 23–198 GeV/c2, inspired by Ref. [13], and different combinations of gluino and squark masses are studied.

Detector description

The LHCb detector [18, 19] is a single-arm forward spectrometer covering the pseudorapidity range 2<η<5, designed for the study of particles containing b or c quarks. The detector includes a high-precision tracking system consisting of a silicon-strip vertex detector surrounding the pp interaction region (VELO), a large-area silicon-strip detector located upstream of a dipole magnet with a bending power of about 4Tm, and three stations of silicon-strip detectors and straw drift tubes, placed downstream of the magnet. The tracking system provides a measurement of momentum, p, of charged particles with a relative uncertainty that varies from 0.5% at low momentum to 1.0% at 200GeV/c. The minimum distance of a track to a primary vertex (PV), the impact parameter dIP, is measured with a resolution of (15+29/pT)μm, where pT is the component of the momentum transverse to the beam axis, in GeV/c. Different types of charged hadrons are distinguished using information from two ring-imaging Cherenkov detectors. Photons, electrons and hadrons are identified by a calorimeter system consisting of scintillating-pad and preshower detectors, an electromagnetic calorimeter and a hadronic calorimeter. Muons are identified by a system composed of alternating layers of iron and multiwire proportional chambers. The online event selection is performed by a trigger [20], which consists of a hardware stage based on information from the calorimeter and muon systems, followed by a software stage which runs a simplified version of the offline event reconstruction.

Event generation and detector simulation

Several sets of simulated events are used to design and optimize the signal selection and to estimate the detection efficiency. Proton-proton collisions are generated in Pythia  6 with a specific LHCb configuration [21], and with parton density functions taken from CTEQ6L [22]. The LLP signal in this framework is represented by the lightest neutralino χ~10, with mass mLLP and lifetime τLLP. It is allowed to decay into two quarks and a muon. Decays to all quark pairs are assumed to have identical branching fractions except for those involving a top quark, which are neglected.

Two separate detector simulations are used to produce signal models: a full simulation, where the interaction of the generated particles with the detector is based on Geant4 [2325], and a fast simulation. In Geant4, the detector and its response are implemented as described in Ref. [26]. In the fast simulation, which is used to cover a broader parameter space of the theoretical models, the charged particles falling into the geometrical acceptance of the detector are processed by the vertex reconstruction algorithm. The simulation accounts for the effects of the material veto described in the next section. The program also provides parameterised particle momenta resolutions, but it is found that these resolutions have no significant impact on the LLP mass reconstruction, nor on the signal detection efficiency. The fast simulation is validated by comparison with the full simulation. The distributions for mass, momentum and transverse momentum of the reconstructed LLP and for the reconstructed decay vertex position are in excellent agreement, as well as the muon momentum and its impact parameter to the PV. The detection efficiencies predicted by the full and the fast simulation differ by less than 5%.

Two LLP production scenarios are considered. In the first, the signal samples are generated assuming the full set of neutralino production processes available in Pythia. In particular, nine models are fully simulated with the parameters given in the Appendix, Table 4. Other points in the parameter space of the theoretical models are studied with the fast simulation, covering the mLLP range 23–198 GeV/c2. These models are referred to as “LV” (for lepton number violation) followed by the LLP mass in  GeV/c2 and lifetime (e.g. LV98 10ps). For the second scenario, the four production mechanisms depicted in Fig. 1, labelled PA, PB, PC, and PD, are selected and studied independently with the fast simulation. The LLP, represented by the neutralino, subsequently decays into two quarks and a muon. The processes PA, PC, and PD have two LLPs in the final state. In processes PC and PD two LLPs are produced by the decay of a Higgs-like particle of mass mh0, and by the decay of squarks of mass mq~, respectively. In process PB a single LLP is produced recoiling against an object labelled as a “gluino”, of mass m``g~''. In order to control the kinematic conditions, the particles generated in these processes are constrained to be on-shell and the “gluino” of option PB is stable. Since LHCb is most sensitive to relatively low LLP masses, only mLLP values below 80 GeV/c2 are considered.

Table 4.

Parameters for the generation of the nine fully simulated signal models. The LLP is the lightest neutralino, χ~10 with mχ~10=mLLP; M1 and M2 are the Pythia parameters RMSS(1) and RMSS(2), mg~ is RMSS(3), μ is RMSS(4), tanβ  RMSS(5) and mq~ is RMSS(8-12). Samples with lifetime of 5, 10 and 50ps have been produced for each mass

Model M1 [GeV/c2] M2 [GeV/c2] mg~GeV/c2 ] tanβ μ mq~GeV/c2 ] mχ~10GeV/c2 ]
LV38 5/10/50ps 40 2000 2000 2.0 1200 1300 38
LV98 5/10/50ps 100 2000 2000 2.0 1200 1300 98
LV198 5/10/50ps 200 2000 2000 2.0 1200 1300 198

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Four topologies considered as representative LLP production mechanisms: PA non-resonant direct double LLP production, PB single LLP production, PC double LLP production from the decay of a Higgs-like boson, PD double LLP indirect production via squarks

The background from direct production of heavy quarks, as well as from W and Z boson decays, is studied using the full simulation. A sample of 9×106 inclusive cc¯ events with at least two c hadrons in 1.5<η<5.0, and another sample of about 5×105 tt¯ events with at least one muon in 1.5<η<5.0 and pT>10GeV/c were produced. Several million simulated events are available with production of W and Z bosons. The most relevant background in this analysis is from bb¯ events. The available simulated inclusive bb¯ events are not numerous enough to cover the high-pT muon kinematic region required in this analysis. To enhance the bb¯ background statistics, a dedicated sample of 2.14×105 simulated events has been produced with a minimum parton p^T of 20GeV/c and requiring a muon with pT>12GeV/c in 1.5<η<5.0. As a consequence of limitations in the available computing power, only bb¯ events with s=7TeV have been fully simulated. Despite the considerable increase of generation efficiency, all the simulated bb¯ events are rejected by the multivariate analysis presented in the next section. Therefore a data-driven approach is employed for the final background estimation.

Event selection

Signal events are selected by requiring a displaced high-multiplicity vertex with one associated isolated high-pT muon, since, due to the larger particle mass, muons from LLP decays are expected to have larger transverse momenta and to be more isolated than muons from hadron decays.

The events from pp collisions are selected online by a trigger requiring muons with pT>10GeV/c. Primary vertices and displaced vertices are reconstructed offline from charged particle tracks [27] with a minimum reconstructed pT of 100MeV/c. Genuine PVs are identified by a small radial distance from the beam axis, Rxy<0.3 mm. The offline analysis requires that the triggering muon has an impact parameter to all PVs of dIP>0.25mm and pT>12 GeV/c. To suppress the background due to kaons or pions punching through the calorimeters and being misidentified as muons, the corresponding energy deposit in the calorimeters must be less than 4% of the muon energy. To preserve enough background events in the signal-free region for the signal determination algorithm described in Sect. 5, no isolation requirement is applied at this stage. Secondary vertices are selected by requiring Rxy>0.55 mm, at least four tracks in the forward direction (i.e. in the direction of the spectrometer) including the muon and no tracks in the backward direction. The total invariant mass of the tracks coming from a selected vertex must be larger than 4.5 GeV/c2. Particles interacting with the detector material are an important source of background. A geometric veto is used to reject events with vertices in regions occupied by detector material [28].

The number of data events selected is 18 925 (53 331) in the 7TeV (8TeV) datasets. Less than 1% of the events have more than one candidate vertex, in which case the candidate with the highest-pT muon is chosen. According to the simulation, the background is largely dominated by bb¯ events, while the contribution from the decays of W and Z bosons is of the order of 10 events. All simulated cc¯ and tt¯ events are rejected. The bb¯ cross-section value measured by LHCb, 288±4±48 μb [2932], predicts (15±3)×103 events for the 7TeV dataset, after selection. The value for the 8TeV dataset is (52±10)×103. The extrapolation of the cross-section from 7 to 8TeV is obtained from POWHEG [3335], while Pythia is used to obtain the detection efficiency. The candidate yields for the two datasets are consistent with a dominant bb¯ composition of the background. This is confirmed by the study of the shapes of the distributions of the relevant observables. Figure 2 compares the distributions for the 7TeV dataset and for the 135 simulated bb¯ events surviving the selection. For illustration, the shapes of simulated LV38 10 ps signal events are superimposed on all the distributions, as well as the expected shape for LV38 50 ps on the Rxy distribution. The muon isolation variable is defined as the sum of the energy of tracks surrounding the muon direction, including the muon itself, in a cone of radius Rηϕ=0.3 in the pseudorapidity-azimuthal angle (η,ϕ) space, divided by the energy of the muon track. The corresponding distribution is shown in Fig. 2b. A muon isolation value of unity denotes a fully isolated muon. As expected, the muon from the signal is found to be more isolated than the hadronic background. Figure 2e presents the radial distribution of the displaced vertices; the drop in the number of candidates with a vertex above Rxy5mm is due to the material veto. From simulation, the veto introduces a loss of efficiency of 13% (42%) for the detection of LLPs with a 30GeV/c2 mass and a 10ps (100ps) lifetime. The radial (σR) and longitudinal (σz, parallel to the beam) uncertainties provided by the LLP vertex fit are shown in Fig. 2f, g. Larger uncertainties are expected from the vertex fits of candidates from bb¯ events compared to signal LLPs. The former are more boosted and produce more narrowly collimated tracks, while the relatively heavier signal LLPs decay into more divergent tracks. This effect decreases when mLLP approaches the mass of b-quark hadrons.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Distributions for the 7 TeV dataset (black histogram) compared to simulated bb¯ events (blue squares with error bars), showing a transverse momentum and b isolation of the muon, c number of tracks of the displaced vertex, d reconstructed mass, e radial position of the vertex, f, g vertex fit uncertainties in the radial and z direction. The fully simulated signal distributions for LV38 10 ps are shown (red dashed histograms), as well as LV38 50 ps (green dotted histogram) in (e). The distributions from simulation are normalised to the number of data entries

A multivariate analysis based on a multi-layer perceptron (MLP) [36, 37] is used to further purify the data sample. The MLP input variables are the muon pT and impact parameter, the number of charged particle tracks used to reconstruct the LLP, the vertex radial distance Rxy from the beam line, and the uncertainties σR and σz provided by the LLP vertex fit. The muon isolation value and the reconstructed mass of the long-lived particles are not used in the MLP classifier; the discrimination power of these two variables is subsequently exploited for the signal determination. The signal training and test samples are obtained from simulated signal events selected under the same conditions as data. A data-driven approach is used to provide the background training samples, based on the hypothesis that the amount of signal in the data is small. For this, a number of candidates equal to the number of candidates of the signal training set, which is of the order of 1000, is randomly chosen in the data. The same procedure provides the background test samples. The MLP training is performed independently for each fully simulated model and dataset. The optimal MLP requirement is subsequently determined by maximizing a figure of merit defined by ϵ/Nd+1, where ϵ is the signal efficiency from simulation for a given selection, and Nd the corresponding number of candidates found in the data.

The generalisation power of the MLP is assessed by verifying that the distributions of the classifier output for the training sample and the test sample agree. The uniformity over the dataset is controlled by the comparison of the MLP responses for several subsets of the data.

The MLP classifier can be biased by the presence of signal in the data events used as background training set. To quantify the potential bias, the MLP training is performed adding a fraction of simulated signal events (up to 5%) to the background set. This test, performed independently for all signal models, demonstrates a negligible variation of the performances quantified by the above figure of merit.

Determination of the signal yield

The signal yield is determined with an extended unbinned maximum likelihood fit to the distribution of the reconstructed LLP mass, with the shape of the signal component taken from the simulated models, plus the background component. After the MLP filter, no simulated background survives; therefore a data-driven method is adopted to determine the background template. The data candidates are separated into a signal region with muon isolation below 1.4 and a background region with isolation value from 1.4 to 2. The signal region contains more than 90% of the signal for all the models considered (see e.g. Fig. 2b). The reconstructed mass obtained from the background candidates is used to constrain an empirical probability density function (PDF) consisting of the sum of two negative slope exponential functions, for which the slope values and amplitudes are free parameters in the fit. The signal PDF is taken from the histogram of the mass distribution obtained from simulation. The fit is performed simultaneously on events from the background region and from the signal region. In the latter the numbers of signal and background events are left free in the fit, while the slope values and the relative strength of the two exponential functions are in common with the background region fit. Examples of fit results are given in Fig. 3, obtained from the 8TeV dataset for two signal hypotheses, LV38 5ps and LV98 10ps. The fitted signal yields, given in Table 1, for both datasets are compatible with the background-only hypothesis.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Reconstructed mass of the LLP candidate from the 8 TeV dataset. The top plots correspond to events with candidates selected from the background region of the muon isolation variable. They are fitted with the sum of two exponential functions. In the bottom row the candidates from the signal region are fitted including a specific signal shape, added to the background component. Subfigures a and c correspond to the analysis which assumes the LV38 5ps signal model, b and d are for LV98 10ps

Table 1.

Total signal detection efficiency ϵ, including the geometrical acceptance, and numbers of fitted signal and background events, Ns and Nb, for the different signal hypotheses. The last column gives the value of χ2/ndf from the fit. The signal models are from the full simulation. Uncertainties are explained in Sect. 6

Dataset Model ϵ % Nb Ns χ2/ndf
7TeV LV 38 5ps 0.52±0.03 140.2±15.5 3.8±10.0 0.64
LV 38 10ps 0.57±0.03 115.2±13.3 4.8±8.2 1.71
LV 38 50ps 0.43±0.02 112.9±13.3 9.0±8.6 1.50
LV 98 5ps 0.58±0.03 97.3±10.3 -3.3±2.4 0.88
LV 98 10ps 0.72±0.04 62.6±8.7 -5.6±2.8 1.06
LV 98 50ps 0.56±0.03 99.9±11.2 -3.9±4.5 0.33
LV198 5ps 0.60±0.04 143.8±12.5 -6.9±2.2 1.42
LV198 10ps 0.76±0.04 158.1±13.1 -6.1±2.7 1.63
LV198 50ps 0.66±0.04 118.8±11.3 -0.9±2.8 0.89
8TeV LV 38 5ps 0.54±0.04 120.3±15.6 2.9±9.5 0.74
LV 38 10ps 0.66±0.04 203.7±19.9 -1.6±13.3 0.81
LV 38 50ps 0.43±0.02 123.3±15.6 3.7±11.0 0.99
LV 98 5ps 0.77±0.05 121.0±11.2 1.0±2.2 1.26
LV 98 10ps 0.96±0.05 123.7±12.0 2.4±3.4 0.74
LV 98 50ps 0.69±0.04 103.8±10.5 2.2±2.8 0.94
LV198 5ps 0.79±0.06 196.3±14.2 -2.3±2.0 1.94
LV198 10ps 1.06±0.07 258.7±16.2 2.3±2.3 1.53
LV198 50ps 0.69±0.04 113.7±10.8 1.3±2.1 1.73

The validity of using events with isolation above 1.4 to model the background has been checked by comparing the relevant distributions from events in the background and in the signal regions, including the muon pT and impact parameter distributions, as well as the number of tracks, invariant mass, vertex Rxy and vertex uncertainties of the LLP candidate. This test is performed with the nominal MLP selection, and also with loosened requirements that result in a threefold increase in the number of background candidates. In both cases all distributions agree within statistical uncertainties, with the χ2/ndf of the comparison in the range 0.6–1.5.

The sensitivity of the procedure is studied by adding a small number of signal events to the data according to a given signal model. The fitted yields are consistent with the numbers of added events on average, and the pull distributions are close to Gaussian functions with mean values between -0.1 and 0.1 and standard deviations on the range from 0.9 to 1.2.

As a final check a two-dimensional sideband subtraction method (“ABCD method” [38]) has been considered. The LLP reconstructed mass and the muon isolation are used to separate the candidates in four regions. The results of this check are also consistent with zero signal for the two datasets.

Both the LLP mass fit and the ABCD methods are tested with W and Z/γ leptonic decays. Isolated high-pT muons are produced in such processes with kinematic properties similar to the signal. By removing the minimum Rxy requirement the candidates can be formed by collecting tracks from the primary vertex. As before, the background is taken from a region of muon isolation above 1.4, which contains a negligible amount of signal. For both datasets the number of events obtained from this study is compatible with the cross-sections measured by LHCb [3941].

Detection efficiency and systematic uncertainties

The total signal detection efficiency, estimated from fully simulated events, is shown in Table 1. It includes the geometrical acceptance, which for the detection of one χ~10 in LHCb is about 11% (12%) at s=7TeV (8 TeV). The efficiencies for the models where the fast simulation is used, including processes PA, PB, PC, and PD, vary from about 0.1% to about 2%. The efficiency increases with mLLP because more particles are produced in the decay of heavier LLPs. This effect is only partially counteracted by the loss of particles outside the spectrometer acceptance, which is especially likely when the LLP are produced from the decay of heavier states, such as the Higgs-like particles of process PC. Another competing phenomenon is that the lower boost of heavier LLPs results in a shorter average flight length, i.e. the requirement of a minimum Rxy disfavours heavy LLPs. The cut on Rxy is more efficient at selecting LLPs with large lifetimes, but for lifetimes larger than 50ps a considerable portion of the decays falls into the material region and is vetoed. Finally, a drop of sensitivity is expected for LLPs with a lifetime close to the b hadron lifetimes, where the contamination from bb¯ events becomes important, especially for low mass LLPs.

A breakdown of the relative systematic uncertainties for the analysis of the 8TeV dataset is shown in Table 2. The table does not account for the uncertainties associated with the fit procedure, which, as described below, require a specific treatment. The uncertainties on the integrated luminosity are 1.7% for 7TeV dataset and 1.2% for 8TeV data [42]. Several sources of systematic uncertainty coming from discrepancies between data and simulation have been considered.

Table 2.

Summary of the contributions to the relative systematic uncertainties, corresponding to the 8 TeV dataset, (the sub-total for the 7 TeV dataset is also given). The indicated ranges cover the fully simulated LV models. The detection efficiency is affected by the parton luminosity model and depends upon the production process, with a maximum uncertainty of 7% for the gluon-gluon fusion process PC. For the fast simulation based analysis there is an additional contribution of 5%. The systematic effects associated with the signal and background models used in the LLP mass fit are not shown in the table

Source Contribution (%)
Integrated luminosity 1.2
Muon detection 2.1–4.5
Muon pT scale 1.5
Muon dIP uncertainty 0.4–1.2
Vertex reconstruction 2.0
Beam line uncertainty 0.2–1.0
MLP training models 1.5–3.6
Muon isolation 2.2
LLP mass scale 0.8–1.5
Models statistics 1.7–2.5
Sub-total 8TeV dataset 4.9–6.5
(Sub-total 7TeV dataset 4.9–6.1)
Parton luminosity 3–7
Analysis with fast simulation 5

The muon detection efficiency, including trigger, tracking, and muon identification efficiencies, is studied by a tag-and-probe technique applied to muons from J/ψμ+μ- [43] and from Zμ+μ- decays [3941, 44]. The corresponding systematic effects due to differences between data and simulation are estimated to be between 2.1 and 4.5%, depending on the theoretical model considered.

A comparison of the simulated and observed pT distributions of muons from Zμ+μ- decays shows a maximum difference of 3% in the momentum scale; this difference is propagated to the LLP analysis by moving the muon pT threshold by the same amount. A corresponding systematic uncertainty of 1.5% is estimated for all models under consideration.

The dIP distribution shows a discrepancy between data and simulation of about 5μm in the mean value for muons from Z decays, with a maximum deviation of about 20μm close to the muon pT threshold. By changing the minimum dIP requirement by this amount, the change in the detection efficiency is in the range 0.4–1.2%, depending on the model.

The vertex reconstruction efficiency is affected by the tracking efficiency and has a complicated spatial structure due to the geometry of the VELO and the material veto. In the material-free region, Rxy<4.5mm, the efficiency to detect secondary vertices as a function of the flight distance has been studied in detail, in particular in the context of the b hadrons lifetime measurement [45]. The deviation of the efficiency in simulation with respect to the data is below 1%. For Rxy from 4.5mm to about 12mm a study performed with inclusive bb¯ events finds differences between data and simulation of less than 5%. The corresponding systematic uncertainties are determined by altering the efficiency in the simulation program as a function of the true vertex position. A maximum of 1% uncertainty is obtained for all the signal models. An alternative procedure to asses this uncertainty considers vertices from B0J/ψK0 decays with J/ψμ+μ- and K0K+π-. The detection efficiency in data and simulation is found to agree within 10%. This result, obtained from a four-particle final state, when propagated to LLP decays with on average more than 10 charged final-state particles for all modes, results in a discrepancy of at most 2% between the LLP efficiencies in data and simulation, which is the adopted value for the respective systematic uncertainty.

The uncertainty on the position of the beam line is less than 20μm [46]. It can affect the secondary vertex selection, mainly via the requirement on Rxy. By altering the PV position in simulated signal events, the maximum effect on the LLP selection efficiency is in the range 0.2–1%.

The imprecision of the models used for training the MLP propagates into a systematic difference of the detection efficiency between data and simulation. The bias on each input variable is determined by comparing simulated and experimental distributions for muons and LLP candidates from Z and W events, and from bb¯ events. The effect of the biases is subsequently estimated by testing the trained classifier on altered simulated signal events: each input variable is modified by a scale factor randomly drawn from a Gaussian distribution of width equal to the corresponding bias. The RMS variation of the signal efficiency distributions after the MLP range from 1.5 to 3.6% depending on the signal model. These values are taken as contributions to the systematic uncertainties.

The signal region is selected by the requirement of a muon isolation value lower than 1.4. By a comparison of data and simulated muons from Z decays, the uncertainty on this variable is estimated to be ±0.05. This uncertainty is propagated to a maximum 2.2% effect on the detection efficiency.

Comparing the mass distributions of bb¯ events selected with relaxed cuts, a maximum mass scale discrepancy between data and simulated events of 10% is estimated. The corresponding shift of the simulated signal mass distribution results in a variation of the detection efficiency between 0.8 and 1.5%.

The statistical precision of the efficiency value determined from the simulated events is in the range 1.7–2.5% for the different models.

The theoretical uncertainties are dominated by the uncertainty of the partonic luminosity. Their contribution to the detection efficiency uncertainty is estimated following the procedure explained in Ref. [44] and vary from 3% up to a maximum of 7%, which is found for the gluon-gluon fusion process PC.

For the analysis based on the fast simulation, a 5% uncertainty is added to account for the difference between the fast and the full simulation, as explained in Sect. 3.

The choice of the background and signal templates can affect the results of the LLP mass fit. The uncertainty due to the signal model accounts for the mass scale, the mass resolution and the finite number of events available to construct the model. Pseudoexperiments in which 10 signal events are added to the data are analysed with a modified signal template, and the resulting number of fitted candidates is compared to the result from the nominal fit model. Assuming as before a 10% uncertainty on the signal mass scale, a maximum absolute variation of 0.6 fitted signal candidates is obtained. No significant effects are obtained by modifying the signal mass resolution with an additional smearing. Changing the statistical precision by reducing the initial number N of signal events used to build the histogram PDF by 2N has no significant effect either.

The uncertainty induced by the choice of the background model is obtained by reweighting the candidates from the background region in such a way that the distribution of the number of tracks included in the LLP vertex fit exactly matches the distribution in the signal region. This test is motivated by the fact that the number of tracks has a significant correlation with the measured mass. The fits of the mass distribution of pseudoexperiments give absolute variations in the numbers of fitted signal events in the range 0.1–1.6, the largest value at low LLP mass. Reweighting the candidates in such a way as to match the pT distributions gives variations which are less than 0.5 events for all models. Moving the isolation threshold by ±0.1 leads to variations of the order of 0.01 events. In conclusion, the variation on the number of fitted candidates associated to the choice of the PDF models is in the range of 1–2 events. The calculation of the cross-section upper limits takes into account this uncertainty as an additional nuisance parameter on the fit procedure.

Results

The LLP candidates collected at s=7 and 8 TeVare analysed independently. The fast simulation is used to extend the MSSM/mSUGRA theoretical parameter space of the LV models, and for the analysis of processes PA, PB, PC, and PD. The results obtained are found to be compatible with the absence of signal for all signal model hypotheses considered. The 95% confidence level (CL) upper limit on the production cross-sections times branching fraction is computed for each model using the CLs approach [46]. The numerical results for the fully simulated LV models are given in Table 3.1 A graphical representation of selected results is given in Figs. 4, 5 and 6.

Table 3.

Upper limits (95% CL) on the production cross-section times branching fraction (pb) for the 7TeV and 8TeV datasets, based on the fully simulated LV signal samples

7TeV dataset 8TeV dataset
Model Expected Observed Expected Observed
LV 38 5ps 4.03-1.20+1.79 4.73 2.04-0.60+0.89 2.32
LV 38 10ps 2.95-0.89+1.36 3.76 2.24-0.65+0.95 2.13
LV 38 50ps 4.08-1.24+1.89 6.15 2.86-0.83+1.23 3.10
LV 98 5ps 1.78-0.60+0.97 1.21 0.62-0.22+0.36 0.57
LV 98 10ps 1.52-0.49+0.78 0.94 0.52-0.17+0.27 0.53
LV 98 50ps 2.21-0.70+1.10 1.83 0.70-0.25+0.41 0.77
LV198 5ps 1.50-0.52+0.86 0.95 0.59-0.21+0.34 0.40
LV198 10ps 1.18-0.41+0.68 0.85 0.27-0.11+0.20 0.42
LV198 50ps 0.92-0.38+0.67 1.07 0.52-0.21+0.35 0.58

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Expected (open dots with 1σ and 2σ bands) and observed (full dots) cross-section times branching fraction upper limits at 95% confidence level, as a function of the LLP mass from the 8 TeV dataset. The theoretical models assume the full set of SUSY production processes available in Pythia  6 with default parameter settings, unless otherwise specified. The gluino mass is 2000 GeV/c2

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Expected (open dots and 1σ and 2σ bands) and observed (full dots) cross-section times branching fraction upper limits (95% CL) for the processes indicated in the bottom left corner of each plot, τLLP is always 10ps. The results correspond to the 8 TeV dataset. a Upper limits as a function of the LLP mass for process PA; b as a function of the LLP mass for process PB, with m``g~''=100 GeV/c2; c as a function of mh0 for process PC for mLLP of 20, 40, and 60 GeV/c2, from top to bottom (the single point at 130 GeV/c2 with mLLP=60GeV/c2 has been shifted to the right for visualisation); d upper limits as a function of the LLP mass for process PD with mq~=60 GeV/c2

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Expected (open dots with 1σ and 2σ bands) and observed (full dots) cross-section times branching fraction upper limits (95% CL) for the processes PC as a function of the LLP mass; the LLP lifetime τLLP is indicated in each plot, mh0=125GeV/c2. The results correspond to the 8 TeV dataset

The MSSM/mSUGRA LV models are explored by changing the common squark mass and the gluino mass. Figure 4 gives examples of the cross-section times branching fraction upper limits as a function of mLLP for such models for two values of τLLP, and two values of the squark mass. The gluino mass is set to 2000 GeV/c2. Varying the gluino mass from 1500 to 2500 GeV/c2 has almost no effect on the results. The decrease of sensitivity for decreasing mLLP is explained by the above-mentioned effects on the detection efficiency.

A representation of selected results from the processes PA, PB, PC, and PD is given in Fig. 5. The single LLP production of PB has a lower detection probability compared to the double LLP production case, PA, which explains the reduced sensitivity. The PB plots correspond to m``g~''=100GeV/c2. Varying m``g~'' from 100 to 1000 GeV/c2 decreases the detection efficiency by a factor of two, while an increase by a factor of two is obtained reducing m``g~'' to 20 GeV/c2. The results for process PC are given as a function of the Higgs-like boson mass, for three values of mLLP. Again the sensitivity of the analysis drops with decreasing mLLP. The results shown for PD are for mq~=60GeV/c2, which limits the maximum mLLP value. In process PD some of scattering energy is absorbed by an additional jet during the LLP production, reducing the detection efficiency by a factor of two with respect to PA. Finally, Fig. 6 gives the cross-section upper limits times branching fraction as a function of mLLP, for the process PC with a mass of 125 GeV/c2 for the Higgs-like boson and LLP lifetime from 5 to 100ps. These results can be compared to the prediction of the Standard Model Higgs production cross-section of about 21pb at s=8TeV [46].

Conclusion

Long-lived massive particles decaying into a muon and two quarks have been searched for using proton-proton collision data collected by LHCb at s=7 and 8 TeV, corresponding to integrated luminosities of 1 and 2 fb-1, respectively. The background is dominated by bb¯ events and is reduced by tight selection requirements, including a dedicated multivariate classifier. The number of candidates is determined by a fit to the LLP reconstructed mass with a signal shape inferred from the theoretical models.

LHCb can study the forward region 2<η<5, and its low trigger pT threshold allows the experiment to explore relatively small LLP masses. The analysis has been performed assuming four LLP production mechanisms with the topologies shown in Fig. 1, covering LLP lifetimes from 5 ps up to 100ps and masses in the range 20–80  GeV/c2. One of the processes proceeds via the decay of a Higgs-like particle into two LLPs: the mass of the Higgs-like particle is varied between 50 and 130 GeV/c2, comprising the mass of the scalar boson discovered by the ATLAS and CMS experiments. In addition, the full set of neutralino production mechanisms available in Pythia in the context of MSSM/mSUGRA has been considered, with an LLP mass range 23–198  GeV/c2. The results for all theoretical models considered are compatible with the background-only hypothesis. Upper limits at 95% CL are set on the cross-section times branching fractions.

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to our colleagues in the CERN accelerator departments for the excellent performance of the LHC. We thank the technical and administrative staff at the LHCb institutes. We acknowledge support from CERN and from the national agencies: CAPES, CNPq, FAPERJ and FINEP (Brazil); NSFC (China); CNRS/IN2P3 (France); BMBF, DFG and MPG (Germany); INFN (Italy); FOM and NWO (The Netherlands); MNiSW and NCN (Poland); MEN/IFA (Romania); MinES and FASO (Russia); MinECo (Spain); SNSF and SER (Switzerland); NASU (Ukraine); STFC (United Kingdom); NSF (USA). We acknowledge the computing resources that are provided by CERN, IN2P3 (France), KIT and DESY (Germany), INFN (Italy), SURF (The Netherlands), PIC (Spain), GridPP (United Kingdom), RRCKI and Yandex LLC (Russia), CSCS (Switzerland), IFIN-HH (Romania), CBPF (Brazil), PL-GRID (Poland) and OSC (USA). We are indebted to the communities behind the multiple open source software packages on which we depend. Individual groups or members have received support from AvH Foundation (Germany), EPLANET, Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions and ERC (European Union), Conseil Général de Haute-Savoie, Labex ENIGMASS and OCEVU, Région Auvergne (France), RFBR and Yandex LLC (Russia), GVA, XuntaGal and GENCAT (Spain), Herchel Smith Fund, The Royal Society, Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851 and the Leverhulme Trust (UK).

Appendix

Parameters of the fully simulated signal models

The parameters used to generate nine fully simulated signal samples in the context of MSSM/mSUGRA are given in Table 4. Other MSSM parameters remain at their default Pythia values. The lightest neutralino, χ~10, decays via the lepton number violating mode LQD (for the definition see [3, 14]). As an approximation, equal branching fractions are assumed for all QD pairs, except for the pairs with a top quark, which are excluded.

Two sets of events have been produced with s =7 and 8 TeV. Only events with one muon and one χ~10 in the LHCb acceptance are processed in Geant4, corresponding to about 11% of the s =7 TeV generated events, 12% at 8 TeV.

Footnotes

1

The numerical results for all the other models are available as supplementary material.

References

  • 1.Dimopoulos S, Raby S, Wilczek F. Supersymmetry and the scale of unification. Phys. Rev. D. 1981;24:1681. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.24.1681. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.S.P. Martin, A supersymmetry primer. arXiv:hep-ph/9709356. doi:10.1142/9789812839657_0001
  • 3.Graham PW, Kaplan DE, Rajendran S, Saraswat P. Displaced supersymmetry. JHEP. 2012;07:149. doi: 10.1007/JHEP07(2012)149. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Strassler MJ, Zurek KM. Discovering the Higgs through highly-displaced vertices. Phys. Lett. B. 2008;661:263. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2008.02.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.D0 Collaboration, V.M. Abazov et al., Search for resonant pair production of neutral long-lived particles decaying to bb¯ in pp¯ collisions at s=1.96TeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 071801 (2009). arXiv:0906.1787 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 6.CDF Collaboration, T. Aaltonen et al., Search for heavy metastable particles decaying to jet pairs in pp collisions at s=1.96TeV. Phys. Rev. D 85, 012007 (2012). arXiv:1109.3136
  • 7.ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for pair-produced long-lived neutral particles decaying in the ATLAS hadronic calorimeter in pp collisions at s=8TeV. Phys. Lett. B 743, 15 (2015). arXiv:1501.04020
  • 8.ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for massive, long-lived particles using multitrack displaced vertices or displaced lepton pairs in pp collisions at s=8TeV with the ATLAS detector. Phys. Rev. D 92, 072004 (2015). arXiv:1504.05162
  • 9.CMS Collaboration, V. Khachatryan et al., Search for long-lived neutral particles decaying to quark–antiquark pairs in proton–proton collisions at s=8TeV. Phys. Rev. D 91, 012007 (2015). arXiv:1411.6530
  • 10.LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Search for long-lived particles decaying to jet pairs. Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 152 (2014). arXiv:1412.3021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 11.LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Search for Higgs-like boson decaying into pair of long-lived particles. Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 664 (2016). arXiv:1609.03124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 12.Graham PW, Rajendran S, Saraswat P. Supersymmetric crevices: missing signatures of R-parity violation at the LHC. Phys. Rev. D. 2014;90:075005. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.075005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Allanach BC, Dedes A, Dreiner HK. R parity violating minimal supergravity model. Phys. Rev. D. 2004;69:115002. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.115002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Phys. Lett. B 716, 1 (2012). arXiv:1207.7214
  • 15.CMS Collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC. Phys. Lett. B 716, 30 (2012). arXiv:1207.7235
  • 16.T. Sjo¨ostrand, S. Mrenna, P. Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual. JHEP 05, 026 (2006). arXiv:hep-ph/0603175
  • 17.LHCb Collaboration, A.A. Alves Jr. et al., The LHCb detector at the LHC. JINST 3, S08005 (2008)
  • 18.LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., LHCb detector performance. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 30, 1530022 (2015). arXiv:1412.6352
  • 19.Aaij R, et al. The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011. JINST. 2013;8:P04022. doi: 10.1088/1748-0221/8/04/P04022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Belyaev I, et al. Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss, the LHCb simulation framework. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2011;331:032047. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/331/3/032047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pumplin J, et al. New generation of parton distributions with uncertainties from global QCD analysis. JHEP. 2002;07:012. doi: 10.1088/1126-6708/2002/07/012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.GEANT4 Collaboration, J. Allison et al., Geant4 developments and applications. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53, 270 (2006)
  • 23.GEANT4 Collaboration, S. Agostinelli et al., GEANT4: a simulation toolkit. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 506, 250 (2003)
  • 24.Clemencic M, et al. The LHCb simulation application, Gauss: design, evolution and experience. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2011;331:032023. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/331/3/032023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.M. Kucharczyk, P. Morawski, M. Witek, Primary vertex reconstruction at LHCb. CERN-LHCb-PUB-2014-044, LHCb-PUB-2014-044
  • 26.LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Search for the rare decay KS0μ+μ-. JHEP 01, 090 (2013). arXiv:1209.4029
  • 27.LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Measurement of J/ψ production in pp collisions at s=7TeV. Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1645 (2011). arXiv:1103.0423
  • 28.LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Measurement of σ(ppbb¯X) at s=7TeV in the forward region. Phys. Lett. B 694, 209 (2010). arXiv:1009.2731
  • 29.Nason P. A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms. JHEP. 2004;11:040. doi: 10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Frixione S, Nason P, Oleari C. Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method. JHEP. 2007;2007(11):070. doi: 10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari et al., A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX. JHEP 2010(6), 43 (2010). arXiv:1002.2581
  • 32.McCulloch WS, Pitts W. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull. Math. Biophys. 1943;5(4):115. doi: 10.1007/BF02478259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hopfield JJ. Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1982;79:2554. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.8.2554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Measurement of the inclusive isolated prompt photon cross section in pp collisions at s=7TeV with the ATLAS detector. Phys. Rev. D 83, 052005 (2011). arXiv:1012.4389
  • 35.LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Measurement of forward W and Z boson production in pp collisions at s=8TeV. JHEP 01, 155 (2015). arXiv:1511.08039
  • 36.LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Measurement of the forward Z boson cross-section in pp collisions at s=7TeV. JHEP 08, 039 (2015). arXiv:1505.07024
  • 37.LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Measurement of the forward W boson production cross-section in pp collisions at s=7TeV. JHEP 12, 079 (2014). arXiv:1408.4354
  • 38.LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Precision luminosity measurements at LHCb. JINST 9, P12005 (2014). arXiv:1410.0149
  • 39.LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Measurement of the track reconstruction efficiency at LHCb. JINST 10, P02007 (2015). arXiv:1408.1251
  • 40.LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Inclusive W and Z production in the forward region at s=7TeV. JHEP 06, 058 (2012). arXiv:1204.1620
  • 41.LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Measurements of the B+,B0,Bs0 meson and Λb0 baryon lifetimes. JHEP 04, 114 (2014). arXiv:1402.2554
  • 42.Aaij R, et al. Performance of the LHCb vertex locator. JINST. 2014;9:P09007. doi: 10.1088/1748-0221/9/09/P09007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.M. Botje et al., The PDF4LHC working group interim recommendations. arXiv:1101.0538
  • 44.Read AL. Presentation of search results: the CLs technique. J. Phys. G. 2002;28:2693. doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/28/10/313. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group et al., Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 3. Higgs properties. CERN-2013-004 (2013). arXiv:1307.1347
  • 46.Read AL. Presentation of search results: the CL s technique. J. Phys. G. 2002;28:2693. doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/28/10/313. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The European Physical Journal. C, Particles and Fields are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES