Highlights
-
•
Cholangiolocellular carcinoma (CoCC) is a rare type of liver cancer.
-
•
We report a 79-year-old woman with CoCC detected following elevated C19-9 levels.
-
•
Uniquely, the hepatic artery was observed penetrating the >60 mm tumor on imaging.
-
•
Recurrence with multiple liver metastases occurred 6 months after surgery.
-
•
Tumor size and/or this unique growth pattern may be risk factors for recurrence.
Keywords: Cholangiolocellular carcinoma, Hepatectomy, Hepatic progenitor cell
Abstract
Introduction
Cholangiolocellular carcinoma (CoCC) is thought to originate from hepatic stem cells. Its clinical characteristics, including radiological and prognostic factors, remain unclear.
Presentation of case
A 79-year-old woman with hypertension was admitted to our hospital after abnormal tumor marker levels were detected during an annual physical examination. Her laboratory data results were within normal range, and she was classified as Child-Pugh A. Enhanced computed tomography revealed a tumor located on the left side of the liver, with a maximum size of 60 mm. The tumor showed heterogeneously enhancing edges in the arterial phase, while prolonged tumor enhancement was detected in the delayed phase. Tumor penetration by the left hepatic artery was evident, whereas the left portal vein was invaded by the tumor. The preoperative diagnosis was cholangiocellular carcinoma. Left hepatectomy and cholecystectomy were performed with no postoperative complications; the final diagnosis was CoCC. Multiple liver metastases appeared 6 months after surgery; the patient is now receiving systematic chemotherapy.
Discussion
While portal vein penetration into CoCCs has been reported, the same is not true of the hepatic artery; therefore, this case illustrates a unique tumor growth pattern.
Conclusion
A unique growth pattern as well as a large primary tumor may contribute to earlier recurrence.
1. Introduction
Cholangiolocellular carcinoma (CoCC) is a rare type of liver cancer [1], [2], and was first reported by Steiner and Higginson in 1959 [1]. CoCC is derived from the Canals of Hering, or cholangioles, where hepatic progenitor cells (HPCs) are located [3]. HPCs have the potential to differentiate into hepatocytes and cholangiocytes [4], and expression of the HPC markers CD56, CD13, and epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) are characteristic of CoCC [5].
It is difficult to diagnose CoCC preoperatively without histopathological anaysis; its radiological attributes are very similar to those of cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCC) and malignant lymphoma, which are characterized by tumor enhancement patterns and a specific shape on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) [6]. Vascular penetration into the tumor, with no capsule present, is one of the notable characteristics of CoCC [7]. The disease has a post-curative surgery prognosis that lies between hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and CCC, in terms of favorable outcomes [8], [9].
We present a patient with CoCC who underwent curative surgery, although multiple liver recurrences were observed 6 months later. We also conduct a literature review on CoCCs. This work has been reported in line with the SCARE criteria [10].
2. Presentation of case
The patient was a 79-year-old woman with hypertension; she had no relevant medical history and did not abuse alcohol. Elevated carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) was noted during an annual medical examination, and she was admitted to the Department of Surgery at our institution. Her physical examination was normal; however, her levels of tumor markers were as follows: CA19-9, 370 U/mL (normal, <37.0 U/mL); carcinoembryonic antigen, 1.6 ng/mL (normal, <5.5 ng/mL); alfa-fetoprotein, 2.2 ng/mL (normal, <10.0 ng/mL); and protein induced vitamin K absence or antagonists-II, 20 mAU/mL (normal, <40 mAU/mL). Hepatitis virus markers were all negative. Her laboratory data indicated a Child-Pugh A classification. Contrast-enhanced CT revealed a tumor located in segment 4 measuring 60 mm (at most) with an unclear border. In early-phase imaging, the tumor showed enhancement at the tumor periphery; this was prolonged on late-phase imaging (Fig. 1). With magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the tumor showed low and high intensities on T1-and T2-weighted images, respectively. This enhancement was washed out in the hepatocellular phase. Interestingly, the hepatic artery was observed penetrating the tumor on both CT and MRI. The patient’s preoperative diagnosis was CCC following which left hepatectomy and cholecystectomy were performed. The duration of the surgery was 262 min, and the bleeding volume was 200 mL. Macroscopically, the tumor in segment 4 of the liver was a 60 × 55 × 50 mm well-defined yellowish-white lesion. Histological examination revealed that the proliferating tumor cells replaced the surrounding normal tissue, and were composed of antler-like and anastomosing patterns with abundant fibrous stroma. There was no invasion into the vessels or lymph ducts. Immunohistochemical examination revealed positive expression of cytokeratin (CK) 7, CK19, and EpCAM (Fig. 2). Hence, the final diagnosis was CoCC.
Fig. 1.
Preoperative computed tomography. (A) The tumor in the left hepatic lobe showed enhancement from its periphery, with penetration of the hepatic artery and the dilatation of the peripheral biliary duct in the arterial phase (white arrow). Liver cysts were observed in segments 5 (black arrow). (B) Tumor enhancement was prolonged in the equilibrium phase.
Fig. 2.
Immunohistochemical findings of the tumor. (A) Hematoxylin and eosin staining: The tumor was composed of small glands showing antler-like and anastomosing patterns with abundant fibrous stroma. The tumor was positive for cytokeratin (CK) 7 (B), CK19 (C), and epithelial cell adhesion molecule (D).
The patient was discharged on postoperative day 12 without any complications, and she was administered adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1. However, follow-up CT 6 months after surgery showed multiple liver metastases; therefore, the patients is now receiving systematic chemotherapy with gemcitabine.
3. Discussion
CoCC comprises mixed HCC and CCC components, and is categorized as a subtype of CCC based on World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. The frequency of CoCC occurrence is 0.6–1% among primary liver tumors [1], [2]. Recent histological and immunohistochemical findings have indicated that CoCC are derived from HPCs, which are liver-specific stem cells that can differentiate into hepatocytes and cholangiocytes [3]. Previous studies also showed that most patients with CoCC were infected with hepatitis B or C viruses, or else abused alcohol; inflammation caused by the viral infection is thought to be a risk factor for CoCC [3], [8].
Characteristic radiological findings for CoCC are patchy enhancement patterns in the arterial phase; these enhanced effects are delayed in the equilibrium phase because of the abundant fibrous stroma of the tumor [6], [11], [12]. Some reports have described the imaging findings of CoCC to be very similar to those of CCC or HCC [2], [13]. HCCs commonly show rapid homogeneous enhancement of the tumor that quickly washes out in the late phase [14]. On the other hand, CCC is characterized by a thin and mild peripheral enhancement on early-phase images that is due to an abundant fibrous stroma [15]. Previous studies demonstrated that the presence of a non-obstructed vessel within the tumor (without a capsule) as well as the absence of intratumoral necrosis were particularly characteristic of CoCC [7], [13]. The mechanism of vessel penetration into a tumor was shown to have a replacing growth pattern rather than a compressive one [12]. Portal vein penetration into the tumor has been reported [12], and is commonly detected in malignant lymphoma or CCC [13]. On the other hand, the penetration of the hepatic artery into the tumor has not been previously reported. The difference between the feeding and penetrating arteries on CT is that the feeding artery appears to be involved with the tumor, and radially narrows so that it is undetectable on CT when it is in close proximity to the lesion. However, a penetrating artery persists after passing through the tumor and can be traced on CT. Hepatic artery penetration may therefore be an important finding in CoCC, and may represent a unique tumor growth pattern.
Pathological and immunohistological examinations are important for the diagnosis of CoCC. According to the WHO classification, the histologic features of CoCC include admixtures of small monotonous glands, antler-like or anastomosing patterns with abundant fibrous stroma, and cuboidal tumor cell that are smaller in size than normal hepatocytes. Immunohistochemical examination is also useful for the diagnosis of CoCC; because they were derived from HPCs, these tumor cells are positive for CD155, CD44, and EpCAM . Some studies reported that the biliary markers CK9 and CK19 were expressed in CoCCs [5]; the tumor in our case showed positivity for EpCAM, CK7, and CK19.
A list of reported patients with CoCC who underwent resection is shown in Table 1 [6], [11], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21]. CoCC exhibits less invasion to the portal vein as well as a lower number of intrahepatic metastases than CCC [8]. Therefore, patients with CoCC survived longer after surgery than those with CCC [3], [8]. Tomioku et al. reported a patient who underwent repeated hepatectomy for recurrent intrahepatic CoCC [6]; hence, patients with solitary and metachronous liver recurrence may be candidates for curative resection. In fact, curative resection is the first choice for patients with CoCC. The prognosis and recurrence rates of CoCC are also unclear, although a maximal tumor size of >40 mm was reported to be an independent risk factor for recurrence [3]. Despite receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, our patient, whose tumor had a maximum diameter of 60 mm, experienced early recurrence. The effect of chemotherapy in patients with CoCC remains unclear; further investigations are required to determine effective adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for this disease.
Table 1.
Reported clinicopathological variables of patients with CoCC following curative surgery.
| Author | Age | Sex | Etiology | CEA (ng/L) |
CA19-9 (U/mL) |
Tumor location | Maximal tumor size (mm) |
Surgery | CK7/19 | EpCAM | Postoperative therapy | Prognosis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matsuda | 70 | M | HCV | Normal | Normal | S7 | 22 | Medial and posterior segmentectomy without LD | ND/+ | (−) | ND | Alive for 30 months without recurrence |
| Kanamoto | 71 | M | HCV | Normal | Normal | Right lobe | 15 | Partial hepatectomy without LD | +/− | ND | ND | Alive for 12 months without recurrence |
| Kadono | 45 | F | (−) | Normal | Normal | S4 | 75 | Partial hepatectomy without LD | +/+ | ND | ND | Alive for 12 months without recurrence |
| Ishii | 59 | M | HBV | 53.7 | 6752 | Right lobe | 140 | Extended right lobectomy with LD | ND/+ | ND | ACT: GEM, cisplatin GEM, S-1 |
Alive for 4 months with multiple liver metastasis |
| Jung | 62 | M | Alcohol | 2.2 | 12.1 | Right lobe | 50 | Right lobectomy without LD | ND/+ | (+) | ND | ND |
| Tomioku | 59 | F | (−) | Normal | 32.1 | Right lobe | 100 | Extended right lobectomy without LD | +/+ | ND | ACT: GEM, S-1 Additional hepatectomy |
Alive for 84 months with intrahepatic recurrence |
| Yoh | 72 | M | HCV | ND | ND | S6/8 | 50 | Extended right lobectomy without LD | +/+ | ND | ND | Died after 65 days with multiple liver metastases |
| Suzumura | 45 | M | HBV | ND | ND | S7 | 23 | Posterior segmentectomy without LD | +/+ | (−) | ND | Died after 20 months with lymph node recurrence |
| Sakane | 56 | F | (−) | ND | ND | Right lobe | 16 | Partial hepatectomy without LD | +/+ | ND | ND | ND |
| Present case | 79 | F | (−) | 1.6 | 370 | S4 | 60 | Left lobectomy without LD | +/+ | (+) | ACT: S-1 GEM |
Alive for 10 months with multiple liver metastases |
Abbreviations: ACT, adjuvant chemotherapy; CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CK, cytokeratin; EpCAM, epithelial cell adhesion molecules; F, female; GEM, gemcitabine; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; LD, lymph node dissection; M, male; ND, not described.
4. Conclusion
We reported a case of CoCC in a normal liver that exhibited penetration by the hepatic artery. Multiple liver recurrences occurred even after curative surgery. The tumor size, as well as the unique growth pattern that involved hepatic artery penetration through the tumor, appeared to be risk factors for recurrence.
Conflicts of interest
None.
Funding
This study did not receive funding from any external source.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report.
Author contributions
Hiroaki Yamane was involved in writing the article; Tomoyuki Abe designed the study and was involved in writing the article; and Hironobu Amano, Tsuyoshi Kobayashi, Keiji Hanada, Shuji Yonehara, Hideki Ohdan, Masahiro Nakahara, and Toshio Noriyuki provided critical intellectual input for the described work. All authors have approved the final version of this manuscript.
Ethical approval
Onomichi general hospital.
Guarantor
Tomoyuki Abe.
References
- 1.Steiner P.E., Higginson J. Cholangiolocellular carcinoma of the liver. Cancer. 1959;12:753–759. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(195907/08)12:4<753::aid-cncr2820120420>3.0.co;2-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Shiota K., Taguchi J., Nakashima O., Nakashima M., Kojiro M. Clinicopathologic study on cholangiolocellular carcinoma. Oncol. Rep. 2001;8:263–268. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Komuta M., Spee B., Vander Borght S., De Vos R., Verslype C., Aerts R. Clinicopathological study on cholangiolocellular carcinoma suggesting hepatic progenitor cell origin. Hepatology. 2008;47:1544–1556. doi: 10.1002/hep.22238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Roskams T.A., Libbrecht L., Desmet V.J. Progenitor cells in diseased human liver. Semin. Liver Dis. 2003;23:385–396. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-815564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Akiba J., Nakashima O., Hattori S., Tanikawa K., Takenaka M., Nakayama M. Clinicopathologic analysis of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma according to the latest WHO classification. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2013;37:496–505. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31827332b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tomioku M., Yazawa N., Furukawa D., Izumi H., Mashiko T., Ozawa S. Repeated hepatectomy for recurrent intrahepatic cholangiolocellular carcinoma: report of a case. Tokai J. Exp. Clin. Med. 2016;41:92–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Murakami T., Tsurusaki M. Hypervascular benign and malignant liver tumors that require differentiation from hepatocellular carcinoma: key points of imaging diagnosis. Liver Cancer. 2014;3:85–96. doi: 10.1159/000343864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ariizumi S., Kotera Y., Katagiri S., Nakano M., Nakanuma Y., Saito A. Long-term survival of patients with cholangiolocellular carcinoma after curative hepatectomy. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2014;21(Suppl. 3):S451–S458. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3582-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Abe T., Tashiro H., Kobayashi T., Hattori M., Kuroda S., Ohdan H. Glasgow prognostic score and prognosis after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J. Surg. 2017 doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-3909-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Agha R.A., Fowler A.J., Saetta A., Barai I., Rajmohan S., Orgill D.P. The SCARE statement: consensus-based surgical case report guidelines. Int. J. Surg. 2016;34:180–186. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ishii N., Suzuki H., Tsukagoshi M., Watanabe A., Kubo N., Araki K. Giant cholangiolocellular carcinoma with early recurrence that was difficult to distinguish from cholangiocellular carcinoma: report of a case. Int. Surg. 2015;100:1111–1116. doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-14-00215.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kozaka K., Matsui O., Kobayashi S., Koda W., Minami T., Kitao A. Dynamic CT findings of cholangiolocellular carcinoma: correlation with angiography-assisted CT and histopathology. Abdom. Radiol. 2017;42:861–869. doi: 10.1007/s00261-016-0944-z. (NY) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Asayama Y., Tajima T., Okamoto D., Nishie A., Ishigami K., Ushijima Y. Imaging of cholangiolocellular carcinoma of the liver. Eur. J. Radiol. 2010;75:e120–e125. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Loyer E.M., Chin H., DuBrow R.A., David C.L., Eftekhari F., Charnsangavej C. Hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic peripheral cholangiocarcinoma: enhancement patterns with quadruple phase helical CT – a comparative study. Radiology. 1999;212:866–875. doi: 10.1148/radiology.212.3.r99se32866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kim T.K., Choi B.I., Han J.K., Jang H.J., Cho S.G., Han M.C. Peripheral cholangiocarcinoma of the liver: two-phase spiral CT findings. Radiology. 1997;204:539–543. doi: 10.1148/radiology.204.2.9240550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Matsuda M., Hara M., Suzuki T., Kono H., Fujii H. Synchronously resected double primary hepatic cancers – hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiolocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatobiliary. Pancreat. Surg. 2006;13:571–576. doi: 10.1007/s00534-006-1118-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kadono M., Kimura K., Imamura J., Saeki S., Kurata M., Honda G. A case of a large cholangiolocellular carcinoma. Clin. J. Gastroenterol. 2011;4:340–346. doi: 10.1007/s12328-011-0250-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jung W., Kim B.H. Cholangiolocellular carcinoma with satellite nodules showing intermediate differentiation. Clin. Mol. Hepatol. 2015;21:183–186. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2015.21.2.183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yoh T., Kato T., Hirohata Y., Nakamura Y., Nakayama H., Okamura R. Cholangiolocellular carcinoma with rapid progression initially showing abnormally elevated serum alfa-fetoprotein. Clin. J. Gastroenterol. 2016;9:257–260. doi: 10.1007/s12328-016-0667-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sakane M., Osuga K., Matsui T., Eguchi H., Hori M., Tomiyama N. Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma with stem cell features, cholangiolocellular subtype after inferior vena cava stent placement for a patient with Budd-Chiari syndrome. Acta Radiol. Open. 2016;5 doi: 10.1177/2058460116678277. (2058460116678277) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Suzumura K., Asano Y., Hirano T., Okada T., Uyama N., Aizawa N. Synchronous double cancers of primary hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiolocellular carcinoma: a case report. Surg. Case Rep. 2016;2:139. doi: 10.1186/s40792-016-0262-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


