Skip to main content
CEN Case Reports logoLink to CEN Case Reports
. 2014 Sep 4;4(1):81–84. doi: 10.1007/s13730-014-0144-z

A case of anaphylactoid reaction to acetate in acetate-containing bicarbonate dialysate

Taro Misaki 1,, Yumiko Suzuki 1, Yoshitaka Naito 1, Tempei Shiooka 1, Taisuke Isozaki 1
PMCID: PMC5411627  PMID: 28509276

Abstract

A 35-year-old man with end-stage kidney disease due to chronic glomerulonephritis was admitted to our hospital to start maintenance hemodialysis (HD). One hour after starting the first session of HD, he experienced general pruritus, urticaria, and dyspnea. Signs and symptoms were resolved by discontinuing HD and administrating an antihistamine drug; HD-associated anaphylactoid reactions were therefore suspected. Over the next few HD sessions, we changed the dialysis membrane, anticoagulant, HD circuit and needle, in that order, but general pruritus and urticaria again appeared within 3 h after starting each session of HD. Finally, when we changed the dialysate from acetate-containing bicarbonate dialysate to acetate-free bicarbonate dialysate, urticaria was clearly less than that seen in previous HD sessions, and subsided after discontinuation of HD. Subsequently, 20 mg of oral prednisolone (PSL) was administered 1 h before starting HD, and the patient did not experience general pruritus, urticaria, or dyspnea after starting the session. When administered acetate-containing bicarbonate dialysate after oral PSL pretreatment, the patient again experienced general pruritus, urticaria and dyspnea. Few reports have been published on the occurrence of anaphylactoid reactions during HD using acetate dialysate. We report a rare case of anaphylactoid reactions with acetate in acetate-containing bicarbonate dialysate that were reduced with the use of acetate-free bicarbonate dialysate and oral PSL pretreatment.

Keywords: Anaphylactoid reaction, Acetate-containing bicarbonate dialysate, Acetate-free bicarbonate dialysate

Introduction

Anaphylactoid reactions during hemodialysis (HD) are relatively uncommon, but can be life-threatening [1]. The major causes of such reactions are ethylene oxide (ETO), formaldehyde, polyacrylonitrile membranes with or without angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), natural rubber latex (NRL), heparins, and iron [2]. However, very few reports have described the occurrence of anaphylactoid reactions during HD using acetate dialysate [1, 3, 4]. We report a rare case of anaphylactoid reactions induced by acetate-containing bicarbonate dialysate that were reduced by using acetate-free bicarbonate dialysate and oral prednisolone (PSL) pretreatment.

Case report

A 35-year-old man with end-stage kidney disease due to chronic glomerulonephritis was admitted to Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital (Hamamatsu, Japan) in May 2012, to start maintenance hemodialysis (HD).

He had pollinosis and was allergic to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, crab, and furred animals (dogs and cats). He sometimes used antihistamines for urticaria.

After admission, maintenance HD was planned to be performed 3 times per week with a polysulfone membrane (PN-100; Nikkiso, Tokyo, Japan) using heparin sodium as an anticoagulant, and acetate-containing bicarbonate dialysate (Table 1).

Table 1.

Dialysis materials and anaphylactoid reactions in each hemodialysis with alternative use of acetate-containing and acetate-free bicarbonate dialysate

Dialyses 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th
Dialyser membrane Polysulfone PN100 PMMA BG1.3 Cellulose triacetate FB140 Cellulose triacetate FB140 Cellulose triacetate FB140 Cellulose triacetate FB140 Cellulose triacetate FB140 Cellulose triacetate FB140 Cellulose triacetate FB140
Sterilizer Autoclave Gamma ray Gamma ray Gamma ray Gamma ray Gamma ray Gamma ray Gamma ray Gamma ray
Anticoagulant Heparin Parnaparin Parnaparin Parnaparin Parnaparin Parnaparin Heparin Heparin Heparin
Hemodialysis circuit Nipro Nipro Nipro Kawasumi Kawasumi Kawasumi Nipro Nipro Nipro
Sterilizer Gamma ray Gamma ray Gamma ray Autoclave Autoclave Autoclave Gamma ray Gamma ray Gamma ray
Needle Covidien Covidien Covidien Medikit Medikit Medikit Covidien Covidien Covidien
Sterilizer Electron beam Electron beam Electron beam Electron beam Electron beam Electron beam Electron beam Electron beam Electron beam
Dialysate buffer Acetate Acetate Acetate Acetate Acetate-free Acetate-free Acetate-free Acetate Acetate-free
Pretreatmenrt of antihistamine Antihistamine Antihistamine Antihistamine Antihistamine Antihistamine Antihistamine Antihistamine Antihistamine Antihistamine
Pretreatmenrt of PSL 20 mg None None None None None PSL 20 mg PSL 20 mg PSL 20 mg PSL 20 mg
Anaphylactoid reaction Positive Positive Positive Positive Positive (weak) Negative Negative Positive Negative

One hour after starting the first session of HD, the patient experienced general pruritus, urticaria, and dyspnea. These signs and symptoms subsided after discontinuation of HD and administration of an antihistamine agent and 4 mg of betamethasone sodium phosphate.

Total serum immunoglobulin (IgE) level increased to 837.4 U/ml (normal, <360.9 U/ml), but blood eosinophil level was almost within normal limits (210/μl). Signs and symptoms suggested HD-associated anaphylactoid reactions. He had not taken any ACEIs.

Before the second HD session, pretreatment with oral antihistamine had been performed. Three hours after starting the second HD session, pruritus and urticaria appeared again, although the dialysis membrane and anticoagulant were changed to a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) membrane (BG-1.3; Toray Medical, Tokyo, Japan) and parnaparin sodium, respectively.

Three hours after starting the third HD session, the same symptoms appeared, even though the hemodialysis membrane had been changed to a cellulose triacetate membrane (FB140; Nipro Pharma, Osaka, Japan).

Next, we changed the sterilization process for the HD circuit from gamma rays (Nipro Pharma) to autoclaving (Kawasumi, Tokyo, Japan), and also changed the needles from sterilization with an electron beam (Covidien Japan, Tokyo, Japan) to a different system also using an electron beam (Medikit, Tokyo, Japan). However, 3 h after starting the fourth HD session, the same symptoms reappeared.

Drug lymphocyte stimulation testing (DLST) against heparin sodium, parnaparin sodium, polysulfone membrane (PN-100; Nikkiso), PMMA membrane (BG-1.3; Toray Medical), and the HD circuits from Nipro Pharma and Kawasumi all showed negative reactions.

Finally, we suspected the dialysate as a cause of anaphylactoid reactions, and changed the dialysate from acetate-containing bicarbonate dialysate (Kindaly AF2; Fuso, Osaka, Japan) to acetate-free bicarbonate dialysate (Carbostar; Ajinomoto, Tokyo, Japan) (Table 2). Three hours after starting the fifth HD session, urticaria was clearly less than that seen in previous HD sessions.

Table 2.

Constituents of acetate-containing and acetate-free bicarbonate dialysate

Na (mEq/l) K (mEq/l) Ca (mEq/l) Mg (mEq/l) Cl (mEq/l) Bicarbon (mEq/l) Acetate (mEq/l) Citrate (mEq/l) Glucose (mg/dl)
Acetate (−) dialysate 140 2.0 3.0 1.0 111 35 2 150
Acetate (+) dialysate 140 2.0 3.0 1.0 110 30 8 100

Thereafter, 20 mg of oral PSL was administered 1 h before each session of HD. The patient did not subsequently experience any episodes of general pruritus, urticaria, or dyspnea.

Once we re-challenged acetate-containing bicarbonate dialysate after we got informed consent from patient, because it is important whether he can use acetate-containing bicarbonate dialysate to go hemodialysis clinic. Then he experienced general pruritus, urticaria, and dyspnea again, despite pretreatment with oral PSL. We therefore identified acetate in acetate-containing bicarbonate dialysate as the major cause of his anaphylactoid reactions during HD.

Discussion

The present case demonstrated anaphylactoid reactions induced by acetate in acetate-containing bicarbonate dialysate. Various causes of anaphylactoid reactions during HD have been reported [2], including reaction to the ETO gas used to sterilize dialyzers [5], overproduction of bradykinin under treatment with ACEIs [6, 7], allergy to anticoagulants [810], endotoxin contamination of dialysate [11], and bio-incompatibility with the dialysis membrane generating anaphylatoxins such as C3a and C5a [12].

We initially suspected dialysis membranes, sterilizing materials, and anticoagulants as the most likely causes of anaphylactoid reactions. However, we could not identify the cause of anaphylactoid reactions among these, despite changing each of the components involved.

Finally, we suspected acetate in acetate-containing bicarbonate dialysate as the cause of the anaphylactoid reactions. In this case, the relationship between anaphylactoid reactions and acetate in acetate-containing bicarbonate dialysate was strongly suggested by the fact that signs and symptoms were apparent both when acetate-containing bicarbonate dialysate was used initially and when the patient was retreated with acetate-containing bicarbonate dialysate.

Use of acetate dialysate has been linked to hypotension, myocardial depression, hypoxia, lipid metabolism abnormality [13], malnutrition [14], and production of inflammatory cytokines [15]. However, anaphylactoid reactions associated with acetate dialysate have been reported in only a very limited number of cases [1, 3, 4]. Ei et al. [3] described a case with hemodialysis-induced asthmatic attacks that subsided soon after acetate-free dialysate was used. Caravaca et al. [4] reported a case of hypersensitivity reactions that were attributed to the use of either acetate dialysate or cellulose acetate membrane. Papadakis et al. [1] also reported a case of hypersensitivity reactions that were attributed to the use of acetate dialysate.

Just how acetate dialysate induces anaphylactoid reactions remains unexplained.

In most past case reports, anaphylaxis or anaphylactoid reactions have occurred within minutes after initiation of dialysis. In general, immediate allergy occurs in onset and caused by IgE-mediated activation of mast cells and basophils. However, in our case, anaphylactoid reactions occurred 1–3 h after starting dialysis. We cannot explain why anaphylactoid reactions started after such a long time. We expect another pathway exists and stimulates mast cells and basophils. Further studies are needed to clarify the role of acetate in the development of anaphylactoid reactions linked to HD.

The patient in this case suffered from various allergies, and needed to take oral steroids before dialysis even when acetate-free bicarbonate dialysate was being used. We therefore thought that although the major cause of the anaphylactoid reactions appeared to be acetate, some other factors may have been involved.

Hanada et al. [16] reported a case of hemodialysis-associated anaphylactoid reactions that responded successfully to very gradual tapering of the corticosteroid dose. Our patient also took oral corticosteroids, which proved very effective in reducing anaphylactoid reactions. In this case, attempts will be made to gradually taper oral PSL in the near future.

In summary, we encountered a rare case of anaphylactoid reactions associated with acetate in acetate-containing bicarbonate dialysate. When anaphylactoid reactions are seen with HD, the possibility of acetate-containing bicarbonate dialysate as a cause needs to be taken into consideration.

Conflict of interest

The authors state that they have no conflicts of interest (COI).

References

  • 1.Papadakis JT, Patrikarea A, Saradi S, Papakostas K, Leondi A, Kravaritis A, Vafiadis S. Hypersensitivity reactions during hemodialysis related to the use of acetate dialysate. A case report. Clin Nephrol. 1991;35(5):224–226. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ebo DG, Bosmans JL, Couttenye MM, Stevens WJ. Haemodialysis-associated anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions. Allergy. 2006;61(2):211–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2006.00982.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ei K, Hanai I, Horiuchi T, Hanai J, Gotoh H, Hirasawa Y, Gejyo F, Aizawa Y. Hemodialysis-associated asthma in a renal failure patient. Nephron. 1980;25(5):247–248. doi: 10.1159/000181848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Caravaca F, Pizarro JL, Arrobas M, Cuberro JM, Antona E, Sanchez E. Hypersensitivity reactions related to acetate dialysate and cellulose acetate membrane. Nephron. 1987;45(2):158–159. doi: 10.1159/000184101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Walter J, Taraba I. Dialysis hypersensitivity. Nephrol Dial Transplant: Suppl. 1991;3:47–49. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Akizawa T, Kinugasa E, Wakasa S, Kohjiro S, Koiwa F, Koshikawa S. Effect of dialysis membranes and ACE inhibitor on bradykinin levels during hemodialysis. Clin Nephrol. 1994;41:241–244. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tielemans C, Madhoun P, Lenaers M, Schandene L, Goldman M. Vanherweghem JL: anaphylactoid reactions during hemodialysis on AN69 membranes in patients receiving ACE inhibitors. Kidney Int. 1990;38:982–984. doi: 10.1038/ki.1990.301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ueda A, Nagase S, Morito N, Yotsumoto M, Ohba S, Hasegawa Y, Narita M, Koyama A. Anaphylactoid reaction induced by low-molecular-weight heparin in a hemodialysis patient. Nephron. 2001;87:93–94. doi: 10.1159/000045892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Maruyama H, Miyakawa Y, Gejyo F, Arakawa M. Anaphylactoid reaction induced by nafamostat mesilate in a hemodialysis patient. Nephron. 1996;74:468–469. doi: 10.1159/000189371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tholl U, Greinacher A, Overdick K, Anlauf M. Life-threatening anaphylactic reaction following parathyroidectomy in a dialysis patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1997;12:2750–2755. doi: 10.1093/ndt/12.12.2750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bigazzi R, Atti M, Baldari G. High-permeable membranes and hypersensitivity-like reactions: role of dialysis fluid contamination. Blood Purif. 1990;8:190–198. doi: 10.1159/000169966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hakim RM, Breillatt J, Lazarus M, Port F. Complement activation and hypersensitivity reactions to dialysis membranes. N Engl J Med. 1984;311:878–882. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198410043111403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Diamond SM, Henrich WL. Acetate dialysate versus bicarbonate dialysate: a continuing controversy. Am J Kidney Dis. 1987;9(1):3–11. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6386(87)80155-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Matsuyama K, Tomo T, Kadota J. Acetate-free blood purification can impact improved nutritional status in hemodialysis patients. J Artif Organs. 2011;14(2):112–119. doi: 10.1007/s10047-010-0551-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Amore A, Cirina P, Mitola S, Peruzzi L, Bonaudo R, Gianoglio B, Coppo R. Acetate intolerance is mediated by enhanced synthesis of nitric oxide by endothelial cells. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1997;8(9):1431–1436. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V891431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hanada K, Shirai S, Shibagaki Y, Kimura K. A case of hemodialysis-associated anaphylaxis or anaphylactoid reaction, which responded successfully to very gradual tapering dose of corticosteroid. Ther Apher Dial. 2011;15(5):506–507. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-9987.2011.00977.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CEN Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES