Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 3.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2016 Mar;29(2):133–137. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000231

The importance of understanding cognitive trajectories: the case of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome

Ann Swillen 1
PMCID: PMC5414032  NIHMSID: NIHMS854325  PMID: 26779858

Abstract

Purpose of review

22q11.2 deletion syndrome (DS) (velocardiofacial syndrome or DiGeorge syndrome) is the most common known contiguous gene deletion syndrome and is associated with neurodevelopmental problems and diverse neuropsychiatric disorders across the life span. In this review, we discuss the wide variability in intelligence, the developmental phenotypic transitions regarding cognitive development (intelligence) from preschool to adolescence, and the importance of understanding these cognitive trajectories in 22q11.2 DS for care/management and research.

Recent findings

Longitudinal data on the cognitive development of children and adolescents with 22q11.2 DS reveal divergent cognitive trajectories. A decline in verbal IQ precedes the onset of psychosis in 22q11.2 DS.

Summary

Understanding these cognitive trajectories is important since it can guide clinicians to develop adequate support, tailored remediation, and psychiatric care and individualized follow-up.

Keywords: 22q11.2 deletion syndrome, variability in cognitive abilities, divergent cognitive trajectories

INTRODUCTION

Chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS), a neurogenetic condition, is the most common microdeletion syndrome affecting 1 in 2,000–4,000 live births [14] and involving haploinsufficiency of ~50 genes resulting in a multisystem disorder. Detection is typically achieved (after diagnosis of one of the major features of the syndrome) by fluorescent in situ hybridization or via chromosomal microarray, or by prenatal testing. Phenotypic expression is highly variable and ranges from severe life-threatening conditions to only a few associated features. Most common medical problems include congenital heart disease (in particular conotruncal anomalies), palatal abnormalities (most frequently velopharyngeal incompetence (VPI)), immunodeficiency, hypocalcemia due to hypoparathyroidism, severe feeding/gastrointestinal differences, and subtle dysmorphic facial features [5,6]. This wide phenotypic variability and the considerable morbidity associated with 22q11.2DS poses significant challenges for both individual and population based health care management. In light of these challenges, the International 22q11.2 Consortium developed practical guidelines for managing patients with 22q11.2DS that emphasizes the multi-system nature of the condition and includes recommendations for assessment by age and at diagnosis [7,8].

Not only medical issues but also developmental/ educational and behavioral/psychiatric aspects of 22q11.2 DS are (major) concerns for most families with a child/adolescent/adult with 22q11.2 DS. Individuals with 22q11.2DS are at an increased risk for developing several psychiatric disorders; the incidence of anxiety, attention deficit, and autism spectrum disorders is increased in children with 22q11.2DS [9]. Anxiety disorders are also significantly elevated in adults [10] and schizophrenia spectrum disorders are reported in 25–30% of adults [11,12]. Given the focus of this review, we will discuss the trajectories in cognitive development from preschool to adolescence in 22q11.2 DS, and the importance of this knowledge for clinical practice and research.

COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT IN 22Q11.2 DS

One of the first and most important questions parents and caregivers of children with 22q11.2 DS ask is what the impact will be of the 22q11.2 deletion on the global cognitive development. Knowledge on the cognitive capacities are important since it is an important part of planning intervention and re-evaluating an individualized educational plan (IEP). In this respect, it is important to keep in mind that each infant/child/adolescent/adult with 22q11.2DS is unique, and that both genes and environmental factors play essential roles in shaping brain growth and cognitive development throughout life.

Infancy and early childhood (0–4 years)

Very few studies have been published on early development in 22q11.2 DS. During infancy and toddlerhood, cardiac defects, feeding difficulties, frequent infections, gross/fine motor difficulties and expressive language delays and speech problems dominate [13,14,15]. Roizen et al. [16] reported retrospective data from 88 parents (with a child with 22q11.2 DS) about developmental milestones. Compared to sibling and community control participants, expressive language and gross motor milestones were more delayed than other areas of development. Since all studies were cross-sectional and included small samples until now, there is a need for prospective, longitudinal studies on early development in 22q11.2 DS using large samples.

From preschool to adolescence (4–18 years)

From preschool age on learning difficulties and abnormal behavior become apparent. The majority of studies have focused on the intellectual abilities in children and adolescents, and very little is known on the intellectual functioning of adults with 22q11.2 DS [17, 18]. The level of intelligence in children and adolescents with 22q11.2 DS is highly variable and follows a normal distribution (similar to the intelligence quotient (IQ) distribution in the general population), but is shifted about 30 IQ points to the left [19, 20]. The average mean full scale IQ is in the mid-seventies (70–75) with about 55% having a borderline to normal intelligence (FSIQ > 70) and about 45% having a mild (to moderate) intellectual disability (ID) (FSIQ 55-70) and a minority experiencing moderate to severe intellectual disability [2125]. Although the intelligence profile is highly variable, a subgroup of children with 22q11.2 DS show -during early primary school age- a discrepancy between verbal abilities and perceptual reasoning abilities, favoring the verbal domain [18, 22, 26]. This VIQ > PIQ cognitive profile however seems to change with age: by the end of primary school age (age 10 years and older) this VIQ > PIQ profile is less common observed in children with 22q11.2 DS due to the increasing problems they have within the domain of verbal comprehension and abstract verbal reasoning [27]. In a recent cross-sectional study [28] the cognitive functions –measured by a neuropsychological test battery- of a large sample of 137 subjects (ages 8–21) were compared with the performance of youth with a developmental delay and medical comorbidities and with typically developing controls. Complex cognition, specifically language and nonverbal reasoning, was most impaired in the 22q11.2 DS group.

WIDE VARIABILITY IN COGNITIVE FUNCTIONING

The neurocognitive profile is highly variable both between individuals and during the course of development: some patients function within the limits of borderline-normal intelligence while others function in the range of moderate-severe intellectual disability (ID). Current findings indicate that the genetic architecture of ID is complex, consistent with other neurodevelopmental disorders, with an important role for rare variants with large effects [29]. In the 22q11.2 DS literature, several factors have been put forward to explain this wide variability in IQ: origin of the deletion (patients with a familial deletion have been associated with lower IQ scores as compared to de novo deletions) [19,21] genetic variation within the 22q11.2 region [30, 31], gender effect (girls have higher IQ scores that boys) [32] and environmental factors such as socioeconomic status [33] and parental IQ and siblings IQ [34]. Several other possible factors that contribute to this variability in IQ have not been systematically studied yet and therefore should be the focus of future research, for example: the size of the deletion, genes within the region (COMT, PRODH, TBX1, CRKL1, etc.), the remainder of the genome/genetic background, impact of medical problems (e.g. number of hospitalizations), personality and temperament, and risk and protective factors in the environment such as the impact of therapy/remediation/anticipatory guidance, quality of life, coping strategies in the family, availability of social network support and resources…

DIVERGENT COGNITIVE TRAJECTORIES IN 22Q11.2 DS

An optimal design for studying developmental trajectories is to combine initial cross-sectional designs with longitudinal follow-up [35]. Longitudinal studies in 22q11.2 DS have found a negative correlation between age and IQ scores, particularly a decline in VIQ, suggesting that at least some of these individuals show a gradual decline in cognitive development as they grow into adulthood [30,36]. A recent longitudinal study [37] revealed -already from primary school age on- a substantial diversity in trajectories through childhood and adolescence: a) a relative stable IQ-trajectory: a number of children showed adequate progress in their performance to keep up with the gradual increase of the level of cognitive requirements with age; b) a decrease in IQ score or a growing into deficit trajectory due to insufficient cognitive development leading to an increasing discrepancy with age-required norms, and c) an absolute decline in cognitive abilities as manifested by lower subtest raw scores for at least two subtests in a subgroup of children. A recent collaborative study by the international 22Q11 Brain Behavior Consortium (22q11.2 DS IBBC) using a large, pooled cross-sectional dataset (N= 829) including a longitudinal sub-dataset (N= 411) reported that individuals with 22q11.2 DS between 8–24 years showed an average 7-point decline in FSIQ, driven by an average 9-point decline in VIQ and an average 5.1-point decline in PIQ [38]. In the subgroup that developed psychotic symptoms, this decline was significantly steeper. Based on VIQ trajectories, those who subsequently developed a psychotic disorder and those who did not, could be distinguished already from age 11 onwards. In accordance to what is observed in general population regarding the early precursors of psychosis, a decline in verbal IQ precedes the onset of psychosis in 22q11.2 DS.

IMPLICATIONS OF IQ-VARIABILITY AND OF DIVERGENT COGNITIVE TRAJECTORIES

Given the wide IQ-variability (borderline intelligence vs. mild-moderate intellectual disability) in 22q11.2 DS, children and adolescents will follow either normal school with additional learning and educational support (starting from an IEP), or they will need special education with IEPs that are adapted to the individual needs of the child/adolescent. Secondly, given the divergent cognitive trajectories and the possible cognitive decline with age, a follow-up and re-evaluation of these abilities is necessary. Additionally, since in an important subgroup of children and adolescents a decline in IQ occurs (FSIQ, VIQ or PIQ), a continuous adaptation of the expectations and the learning environment will be necessary in order to have a good balance between the cognitive capacities of the child/adolescent and the demands of the environment [39]. In this way, anticipatory guidance and tailored remediation/intervention can be implemented at home and in school, and unnecessary stress can be prevented.

From a research perspective, given the early cognitive decline in 22q11.2DS, this microdeletion syndrome/CNV is an interesting model to investigate possible genes, genetic mechanisms and central neurotransmitter systems in the 22q11.2 region that contribute to cognitive deterioration. A nice illustration of this approach is a recent study by Evers et al. [40]. Their results suggest that a subgroup of adults with 22q11.2 DS may be affected by a neurodegenerative process affecting at least three neurotransmitter systems (serotonin, dopamine and norepinephrine), but the precise mechanism of the cognitive deterioration as seen in 22q11.2 DS, has to be elucidated.

CONCLUSION

There is a wide variability in cognitive abilities and profile in children and adolescents with 22q11.2 DS ranging from borderline intelligence to mild-moderate intellectual disability. This profile is often colored by a complex associated medical phenotype which frequently results in multiple hospitalizations beginning at an early age. Children with a parent who also has 22q11.2DS are at greater risk for a poorer long term outcome, and these families need more intense support and follow-up throughout life [39].

Educators/remedial teachers and psychologists/ psychiatrists are important members of the multidisciplinary team of professionals who provide services to a child/adolescent and adult with 22q11.2 DS.

Recent longitudinal studies on the cognitive development of children and adolescents with 22q11.2 DS reveal substantial diversity in cognitive trajectories through childhood and adolescence: a relative stable IQ trajectory over time (trajectory of delay), a ‘growing into deficit’ trajectory and a trajectory of an absolute decline in IQ, in particular VIQ. This latter trajectory precedes the onset of psychosis in 22q11.2 DS. This recent knowledge is an important finding since it can guide clinicians to develop adequate support, tailored remediation, and psychiatric care and individualized follow-up.

FUTURE RESEARCH

More longitudinal studies using large samples with longer time frames and several follow-ups (time-points) throughout the lifespan (from infancy into adulthood) will be needed. The 22q11.2 International Brain Behavior Consortium (22q11.2 IBBC) offers a unique opportunity to establish and reach these goals. In addition, further research should use more appropriate such as controls matched for age and IQ, and –if possible- medical comorbidities such as type of congenital heart defects, immunological and endocrinological profiles, neurological associations etc….

Finally, future studies should also pay attention to how individual characteristics such as medical factors, neuropsychological factors (e.g. executive functions, working memory), psychiatric comorbidities, family (parenting style, coping styles) and environmental factors (risk and protective factors, therapy/intervention, adaptive learning environment,….) might affect these trajectory patterns. Understanding what drives these diverse developmental outcomes and changes will be crucial. It is our hope that more knowledge of the developmental trajectories in 22q11.2 DS, will help to identify the profiles of clinical needs and may guide intervention and treatment decisions with the ultimate goal to optimize quality of life for all individuals.

KEYPOINTS OF THE PAPER.

  • -

    There is a wide variability in cognitive abilities in individuals with 22q11.2 DS

  • -

    Divergent cognitive trajectories occur already from primary school age on

  • -

    A decline in VIQ precedes the onset of psychosis in 22q11.2 DS

  • -

    More knowledge of the developmental trajectories in 22q11.2 DS will help to identify the profiles of clinical needs and may guide intervention and treatment decisions

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the families with children and adolescents with 22q11.2 DS who have participated in our studies over the years.

The author acknowledges grant from the National Institute of Mental Health (consortium grant U01 MH101722)

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest

None

References

  • 1.Goodship J, Cross I, LiLing J, Wren C, et al. A population study of chromosome 22q11 deletions in infancy. Arch Dis Child. 1998;79:348–51. doi: 10.1136/adc.79.4.348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tezenas Du Montcel ST, Mednizibal H, Ayme S, et al. Prevalence of 22q11 microdeletion. J Med Genet. 1996;33:719. doi: 10.1136/jmg.33.8.719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Devriendt K, Fryns JP, Mortier G, et al. The annual incidence of DiGeorge/velocardiofacial syndrome. J Med Genet. 1998;35:789–90. doi: 10.1136/jmg.35.9.789-a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Oskarsdottir S, Vujic M, Fasth A. Incidence and prevalence of the 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: a population-based study in Western Sweden. Arch Dis Child. 2004;89:148–51. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.026880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McDonald-McGinn DM, Sullivan KE. Chromosome 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome (DiGeorge syndrome/Velocardiofacial syndrome) Medicine. 2011;90(1):1–18. doi: 10.1097/MD.0b013e3182060469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Philip N, Bassett A. Cognitive, behavioural and psychiatric phenotype in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Behav Genet. 2011;41(3):403–12. doi: 10.1007/s10519-011-9468-z. Review. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bassett AS, McDonald-McGinn DM, Devriendt K, et al. Practical guidelines for managing patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. J Pediatr. 2011;159(2):332–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.02.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.*Fung WL, Butcher NJ, Costain G, et al. Practical guidelines for managing adults with 22q11 deletion syndrome. Genet Med. 2015;17(8):599–609. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.175. review This article highlights the guidelines for managing adults with 22q11.2 DS. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.**Schneider M, Debbane M, Bassett AS, et al. Psychiatric Disorders From Childhood to Adulthood in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome: Results From the International Consortium on Brain and Behavior in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome. Am J Psychiat. 2014;171:627–39. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13070864. This first IBBC 22q11 consortium paper describes psychiatric disorders from childhood to adulthood in 22q11.2 DS in the largest sample to date (N=1402) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fung A, McEvilly R, Fong J, et al. Elevated prevalence of generalized anxiety disorder in adults with 22q11.1 deletion syndrome. Am J Psychiatry. 2010;167:998–998. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09101463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Murphy KC, Jones LA, Owen MJ. High rates of schizophrenia in adults with velo-cardio-facial syndrome. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999 Oct;56(10):940–5. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.56.10.940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bassett AS, Hodgkinson K, Chow EW, et al. 22q11 deletion syndrome in adults with schizophrenia. Am J Med Genet. 1998 Jul 10;81(4):328–37. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Swillen A, Feys H, Adriaens T, et al. 2005. Early motor development in young children with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome and a conotruncal heart defect. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005;47(12):797–802. doi: 10.1017/S0012162205001696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gerdes M, Solot C, Wang PP, et al. Cognitive and behavior profile in preschool children with chromosome 22q11 deletion. Am J Med Genet. 1999 Jul 16;85(2):127–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Solot C, Gerdes M, Kirschner RE, et al. Communication issues in 22q11.2 deletion: children at risk. Genet Med. 2001 Jan-Feb;3(1):67–71. doi: 10.1097/00125817-200101000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Roizen NJ, Antshel KM, Fremont W, et al. 22q11.2 DS syndrome: developmental milestones in infants and toddlers. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2007 Apr;28(2):119–24. doi: 10.1097/01.DBP.0000267554.96081.12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Henry JC, Van Amelsvoort T, Morris, et al. 2002. An investigation of the neuropsychological profile in adults with velo-cardio-facial syndrome (VCFS) Neuropsychologia. 2002;40:471–478. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00136-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.van Amelsvoort T, Henry J, Morris R, et al. Cognitive deficits associated with schizophrenia in velo-cardio-facial syndrome. Schizophr Res. 2004 Oct 1;70(2–3):223–32. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2003.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.De Smedt B, Devriendt K, Fryns JP, et al. Intellectual abilities in a large sample of children with Velo-Cardio-Facial Syndrome: an update. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2007;51:666–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2007.00955.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Niarchou M, Zammit S, van Goozen SHM, et al. Psychopathology and cognition in children with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Brit J Psychiatry. 2014;204:46–54. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.132324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Swillen A, Devriendt K, Legius E, et al. Intelligence and psychosocial adjustment in velo-cardio-facial syndrome: a study of 37 children and adolescents with VCFS. J Med Genet. 1997;34:453–8. doi: 10.1136/jmg.34.6.453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Moss EM, Batshaw ML, Solot CB, et al. Psychoeducational profile of the 22q11 microdeletion: a complex pattern. J Pediatr. 1999 Feb;134(2):193–8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(99)70415-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Niklasson L, Rasmussen P, Oskarsdottir S, Gillberg C. Chromosome 22q11 deletion syndrome (CATCH 22): neuropsychiatric and neuropsychological aspects. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002 Jan;44(1):44–50. doi: 10.1017/s0012162201001645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Antshel KM, AbdulSabur N, Roizen N, et al. Sex differences in cognitive functioning in velo-cardio-facial syndrome (VCFS) Dev Neuropsychol. 2005;28(3):849–69. doi: 10.1207/s15326942dn2803_6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Shashi V, Keshavan MS, Howard TD, et al. Cognitive correlates of a functional COMT polymorphism in children with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Clin Genetics. 2006;69(3):234–238. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2006.00569.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Shprintzen RJ. Velo-cardio-facial syndrome: a distinctive behavioral phenotype. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2000;6(2):142–7. doi: 10.1002/1098-2779(2000)6:2<142::AID-MRDD9>3.0.CO;2-H. Review. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Campbell L, Swillen A. The cognitive spectrum in velo-cardio-facial syndrome. In: Murphy KC, Scambler PJ, editors. Velo-Cardio-Facial Syndrome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005. pp. 147–164. [Google Scholar]
  • 28*.Gur R, McDonald-McGinn DM, Tang SX, et al. 2014, Neurocognitive development in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: comparison with youth having developmental delay and medical comorbidities. Molecular Psychiatry. 2014:1–7. doi: 10.1038/mp.2013.189. This study on neurocognitive development in youth with 22q11.2 DS is the first that used youth with DD and youth with medical comorbidities as controls. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Najmabadi H, Hu H, Garshasbi M, Zemojtel T, et al. Deep sequencing reveals 50 novel genes for recessive cognitive disorders. Nature. 2011;478:57–63. doi: 10.1038/nature10423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gothelf D, Eliez S, Thompson T, et al. COMT genotype predicts longitudinal cognitive decline and psychosis in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:1500–2. doi: 10.1038/nn1572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Raux G, Bumsel E, Hecketsweiler B, et al. Involvement of hyperprolinemia in cognitive and psychiatric features of the 22q11 deletion syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2007 Jan 1;16(1):83–91. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddl443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Antshel KM, Fremont W, Kates WR. The neurocognitive phenotype in velo-cardio-facial syndrome: a developmental perspective. Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2008;14(1):43–51. doi: 10.1002/ddrr.7. Review. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Shashi V, Keshavan MS, Kaczorowski J, et al. Socioeconomic status and psychological function in children with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: implications for genetic counseling. J Genet Couns. 2010;19(5):535–44. doi: 10.1007/s10897-010-9309-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.*Olszewski AK, Radoeva PD, Fremont W, et al. Is child intelligence associated with parent and sibling intelligence in individuals with developmental disorders? An investigation in youth with 22q11.2 deletion (velo-cardio-facial) syndrome. Res Dev Disabil. 2014;35:3582–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.08.034. This article highlights that the variability in intelligence in 22q11.2 DS is partly associated with parental IQ and sibling intelligence. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Thomas MS, Annaz D, Ansari D, et al. Using developmental trajectories to understand developmental trajectories. J Speech Language and Hearing Research. 2009;52:336–358. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/07-0144). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Green T, Gothelf D, Glaser B, et al. Psychiatric Disorders and Intellectual Functioning Throughout Development in Velocardiofacial (22q11.2 Deletion) Syndrome. J Am Acad Child Psy. 2009;48:1060–8. doi: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e3181b76683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Duijff SN, Klaassen PW, de Veye HF, et al. Cognitive development in children with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Br J Psychiatry. 2012 Jun;200(6):462–8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.111.097139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38**.Vorstman JA, Breetvelt E, Duijff S, et al. A cognitive decline precedes the onset of psychosis in patients with the 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. JAMA. 2015 Feb 25; doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.2671. This second paper of the IBBC 22q11 consortium on the largest sample on cognitive functioning and psychiatric disorders in 22q11.2 DS to date, that decline in VIQ precedes psychosis in 22q11.2 DS This finding/observation is important for clinical/psychiatric follow-up and care. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39*.Swillen A, McDonald-McGinn D. Developmental trajectories in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2015 Jun;169(2):172–81. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31435. This review paper discusses the divergent developmental trajectories from preschool to adolescence in 22q11.2 DS and impact for clinical practice and research. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40*.Evers L, Curfs L, Bakker J, et al. Serotonergic, noradrenergic and dopaminergic markers are related to cognitive function in adults with 22q11 deletion syndrome. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology. 2014;17:1159–1165. doi: 10.1017/S1461145714000376. This study reports on several central neurotransmitter systems in the 22q11.2 region that contribute to cognitive deterioration. The results suggest that a subgroup of adults with 22q11.2 DS may be affected by a neurodegenerative process affecting at least three neurotransmitter systems (serotonin, dopamine and norepinephrine). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES