Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1975 Feb;55(2):312–316. doi: 10.1104/pp.55.2.312

Influence of a Ceratocystis ulmi Toxin on Water Relations of Elm (Ulmus americana)

Neal K Van Alfen a, Neil C Turner a,1
PMCID: PMC541606  PMID: 16659073

Abstract

Water-soluble glycopeptides isolated from cultures of Ceratocystis ulmi have been reported to be toxins involved in Dutch elm disease. The influence of the glycopeptides on the water relations of Ulmus americana seedlings was tested by placing cut stems in glycopeptide preparations. After 4 hours in 200 micrograms per milliliter toxin the stem conductance of the seedlings was reduced by 79% and the leaf water potential was reduced by 3 bars to that at which the seedlings wilted, the stomata closed, and transpiration decreased. Decrease in stem conductance as the mode of action of the toxin was further confirmed by forcing toxin through the stem and petiole of elm and measuring the effects on stem conductance. High molecular weight dextrans were found to mimic the action of toxin on stem and petiole conductance, and their ability to do so was found to be correlated with their molecular weight. As low as 4 micrograms of toxin or dextrans were found to measurably decrease the stem and petiole conductance of elms. Disruption of the water-conducting system of elms and other plants by small quantities of high molecular weight compounds may be a factor in diseases with wilting symptoms.

Full text

PDF
312

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. COREY R. R., STARR M. P. Colony types of Xanthomonas phaseoli. J Bacteriol. 1957 Aug;74(2):137–140. doi: 10.1128/jb.74.2.137-140.1957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Richards W. C., Takai S. Novel Technique for Isolating Microstructures Present in Shake Cultures of the Fungus Ceratocystis ulmi. Appl Microbiol. 1973 Sep;26(3):443–444. doi: 10.1128/am.26.3.443-444.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Salemink C. A., Rebel H., Kerling L. C., Tchernoff V. Phytotoxin Isolated from Liquid Cultures of Ceratocystis ulmi. Science. 1965 Jul 9;149(3680):202–203. doi: 10.1126/science.149.3680.202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Scholander P. F., Hammel H. T., Hemmingsen E. A., Bradstreet E. D. HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE AND OSMOTIC POTENTIAL IN LEAVES OF MANGROVES AND SOME OTHER PLANTS. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1964 Jul;52(1):119–125. doi: 10.1073/pnas.52.1.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Strobel G. A. Biological Activity of a Phytotoxic Glycopeptide Produced by Corynebacterium sepedonicum. Plant Physiol. 1968 Oct;43(10):1673–1688. doi: 10.1104/pp.43.10.1673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Takai S. Pathogenicity and cerato-ulmin production in Ceratocystis ulmi. Nature. 1974 Nov 8;252(5479):124–126. doi: 10.1038/252124a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Turner N. C., Begg J. E. Stomatal Behavior and Water Status of Maize, Sorghum, and Tobacco under Field Conditions: I. At High Soil Water Potential. Plant Physiol. 1973 Jan;51(1):31–36. doi: 10.1104/pp.51.1.31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Turner N. C., Parlange J. Y. Analysis of operation and calibration of a ventilated diffusion porometer. Plant Physiol. 1970 Jul;46(1):175–177. doi: 10.1104/pp.46.1.175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Turner N. C. Stomatal Behavior and Water Status of Maize, Sorghum, and Tobacco under Field Conditions: II. At Low Soil Water Potential. Plant Physiol. 1974 Mar;53(3):360–365. doi: 10.1104/pp.53.3.360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES