Skip to main content
. 2010 Aug;24(8):1694–1695. doi: 10.1210/mend.24.8.9999

Table 1.

Gene Set Enrichment Analysis reveals stronger stimulation of known E2 regulated genes in polysomes

Pathway E2 polysome vs. vehicle polysome E2 total vs. vehicle total
NES P value NES P value
ER binding (genes within 10 kb) 2.06 0.00 1.61 0.00
Stossi E2 UP signature 2.35 0.000 1.74 0.000
Frasor E2 UP signature 3.04 0.000 2.00 0.000
GenMapp
Ribosomal proteins 2.87 0.000 0.68 0.975
Proteasome 2.07 0.000 −0.80 0.754
Oxidative Phosphorylation 1.75 0.000 0.69 0.952
Glycolysis 1.65 0.023 0.51 1.000
DNA replication reactome 0.83 0.738 1.42 0.034
G1 to S Cell Cycle Reactome 0.87 0.723 1.20 0.168
ATP Synthesis 1.17 0.261 0.51 0.985
RNA Transcription Reactome 1.44 0.060 1.59 0.016
Apoptosis 1.30 0.109 1.34 0.078
Biocarta
ERK Pathway 1.80 0.003 1.25 0.163
WNT Pathway 1.55 0.044 1.51 0.037
MAPK Pathway 1.43 0.022 1.43 0.021
P38MAPK Pathway 1.17 0.209 1.82 0.004
CREB Pathway 0.99 0.462 1.58 0.025

Normalized Enrichment Scores, NES, higher than 1.4 suggests significant bias towards E2. Positive NES scores indicate bias towards E2 while negative values indicate vehicle bias. P values < 0.1 are significant. Bold indicates possible translational regulation with significant E2 stimulation in the polysome level only. Italics indicates transcriptome-level E2 stimulation but not a translational response in the polysome comparisons.