Introduction
KEY TEACHING POINTS
|
Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the second most frequent form of paroxysmal narrow complex tachycardia in the pediatric population.1, 2 A conservative approach is used for ablation in children because of anatomical limitations and risks related to a permanent pacemaker in the case of atrioventricular nodal conduction damage. Cryoablation has emerged in the first years of the millennium and propagated thanks to the minimal risk to the native conduction tissue. Many reports in the literature advocate this approach as the gold standard combining high rates of success with optimal procedure safety and minimal risks.3, 4 However, electrophysiologists rarely encounter patients in whom neither a cryoablation strategy nor a cautious radiofrequency approach in the lower positions of the triangle of Koch seem to be effective in modifying the conduction properties of the slow pathway. Even though there are articles reporting this finding in the adult population,5, 6, 7, 8, 9 there is no literature advocating this approach in the pediatric population. The aim of this article is to attempt an alternative approach in intractable cases of atrioventricular reentry tachycardia in the younger population.
Case report
A 13-year-old football player with a 1-year history of recurrent palpitations during exercise despite β-blocker therapy attended our Paediatric Arrhythmia Clinic. An initial electrophysiology study diagnosed typical slow-fast AVNRT. Despite an aggressive radiofrequency ablation procedure including lesions in the low, middle, and superior aspects of the triangle of Koch as well as in the coronary sinus, we could not induce any junctional response. After a conventional right-sided procedure, there was no modification in the tachycardia characteristics or in the slow pathway conduction (including tachycardia induction, cycle length, and slow pathway refractory period). A decision was made to attempt a left-sided procedure.
A steerable decapolar electrode catheter was placed in the coronary sinus, and the His position was again identified on the anterior septum. The transseptal puncture was performed using the usual technique under fluoroscopy guidance without complications, followed by heparin administration. A deflectable catheter with a 4-mm tip was introduced into the left atrium, and the septal aspect of the mitral valve was mapped. A balanced atrioventricular signal with multicomponent atrial electrograms and low amplitude potentials was identified in the posteroseptal aspect of the mitral annulus, 3 mm above the coronary sinus (Figure 1). This left site clearly corresponded with the usual target for a conventional right-sided procedure (Figure 2, Figure 3). At this point, a single radiofrequency application resulted in an immediate accelerated junctional response with stable retrograde ventriculoatrial conduction. This application also resulted in temperatures of 55°–60° and was continued for 60 seconds. After this ablation, AVNRT was not inducible despite aggressive atrial stimulation on isoprenaline. The procedure was terminated without complications, and the patient did not show recurrence of palpitations afterward.
Figure 1.
Intracardiac electrogram during ablation on the left septum with the catheter position as shown in Figure 2, Figure 3. Note the atrial signals at the site of success (first beat) followed by an immediate junctional acceleration beat.
Figure 2.
Catheter position at the site of success in the RAO projection. The CS decapolar catheter provides a useful landmark for transseptal access and ablation. CS = coronary sinus; RAO = right anterior oblique.
Figure 3.
Catheter position at the site of success in the LAO projection. CS = coronary sinus; LAO = left anterior oblique.
Discussion
AVNRT can be safely cured with a slow pathway ablation procedure in the inferior triangle of Koch in 95% of the cases.10 However, atrioventricular nodal tissue has a wide spectrum of anatomy variability, and this classical approach is not always effective. The evidence for this finding has to be searched in the complex characteristics of the 3-dimensional nodal “box.”
The nodal area anatomy consists of 2 main inputs from the right atrium: (1) the fast wavefront composed of transitional cells in the region extending from the compact node to the anterior aspect of the triangle of Koch and (2) the slow wavefront composed of a deeper inferoposterior extension. A third wavefront has been described that extends from the septal left atrial tissue to the compact region via the septal region and the roof of the coronary sinus.
The mechanisms that guide the development of the nodal morphological and electrical characteristics and the reason why in rare cases the left input prevails are unclear. The cases of successful left-sided AVNRT ablation procedures reported in the literature do not include young patients. Is this anisotropic conductive region still developing during the first years of life? We cannot exclude the fact that this highly complex tissue continues to evolve in the postnatal period, resulting in unusual electric extensions at a later age. Pediatric electrophysiologists know well that an early onset of AVNRT is extremely rare; the vast majority of non–pre-excited supraventricular tachycardias in the fetus and during the first years of life are due to concealed accessory pathways.11
Whatever may be the explanation of this rare phenomenon, there is 1 well-known fact: a better understanding of the peculiarities and variants of the nodal region is essential for performing successful ablation procedures with minimal risks.
References
- 1.Ko J.K., Deal B.J., Strasburger J.F., Benson D.W. Supraventricular tachycardia mechanisms and their age distribution in pediatric patients. Am J Cardiol. 1992;69:1028–1032. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90858-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Elvas L., Gursoy S., Brugada J., Andries E., Brugada P. Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: a review. Can J Cardiol. 1994;10:342–348. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hanninen M., Yeung-Lai-Wah N., Massel D., Gula L., Skanes A., Yee R., Klein G., Manlucu J., Leong-Sit P. Cryoablation versus RF ablation for AVNRT: a meta-analysis and systematic review. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24:1354–1360. doi: 10.1111/jce.12247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Santangeli P., Proietti R., Di Biase L., Bai R., Natale A. Cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014;39:111–119. doi: 10.1007/s10840-013-9842-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jais P., Haissaguerre M., Shah D.C., Costa P., Takahashi A., Barold S.S., Clémenty J. Successful radiofrequency ablation of a slow atrioventricular nodal pathway on the left posterior atrial septum. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1999;22:525–527. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00482.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Altemose G.T., Scott L.R., Miller J.M. Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia requiring ablation on the mitral annulus. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2000;11:1281. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2000.01281.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sorbera C., Cohen M., Woolf P., Kalapatapu S.R. Atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia: slow pathway ablation using the transseptal approach. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000;23:1343–1349. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb00961.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kilic A., Amasyali B., Kose S., Aytemir K., Celik T., Kursaklioglu H., Iyisoy A., Ozmen N., Yuksel C., Lenk M.K., Isik E. Atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia ablated from the atrial septum: clinical and electrophysiological characteristics and long-term follow-up results as compared to conventional right-sided ablation. Int Heart J. 2005;46:1023–1031. doi: 10.1536/ihj.46.1023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Giazitzoglou E., Korovesis S., Kokladi M., Venetsanakos I., Paxinos G., Katritsis D. Slow-pathway ablation for atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia with no risk of atrioventricular block. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2010;51:407–410. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Katritsis D.G., Giazitzoglou E., Zografos T., Ellenbogen K.A., Camm A.J. An approach to left septal slow pathway ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2011;30:73–79. doi: 10.1007/s10840-010-9527-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Killen S., Fish F. Fetal and neonatal arrhythmias. Neoreviews. 2008;9:e242–e252. [Google Scholar]



