Corrigendum: Brain Metabolic Changes in Rats following Acoustic Trauma

In the original article, the same graph was used for Figures 3A, 3E and 3I by mistake. The corrected Figure 3 appears below.

Figure 3.

OPLS-DA and S-plot analysis comparing the OPLSDA scores between sham and acoustic trauma animals in different brain regions. Left panel, OPLSDA scores plots, red dots: Sham, purple dots: Acoustic trauma; Right panel, S-plots. (A,B) AC (Predictive component: R²X = 0.194, R²Y = 0.76, Q2 = 0.45; Orthogonal component 1: R²X = 0.446; All components: R²X (cum) = 0.64); (C,D) CB (Predictive component: R²X = 0.152, R²Y = 0.973, Q2 = 0.68; Orthogonal component 1: R²X = 0.364; All components: R²X (cum) = 0.927); (E,F) IC (Predictive component: R²X = 0.293, R²Y = 0.978, Q2 = 0.702; Orthogonal component 1: R²X = 0.417; All components: R²X (cum) = 0.905); (G,H) SC (Predictive component: R²X = 0.238, R²Y = 0.791, Q2 = 0.691; Orthogonal component: R²X = 0.562; All components: R²X (cum) = 0.8); (I,J) VNC(Predictive component: R²X = 0.403, R²Y = 0.779, Q2 = 0.445; Orthogonal component: R²X = 0.389; All components: R²X (cum) = 0.792). AC, auditory cortex; CB, cerebellum; IC, inferior colliculus; CN, cochlear nucleus; VCN, vestibular nucleus complex.

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.