Abstract
The locus CDKN2A/B (9p21.3), which comprises the tumor suppressors genes CDKN2A and CDKN2B and the long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) known as ANRIL (or CDKN2B-AS), was associated with childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) susceptibility in several genome wide association studies (GWAS). However, the variants associated in the diverse studies were different. Recently, new and independent SNPs deregulating the locus function were also identified in association with ALL risk. This diversity in the results may be explained because different variants in each population could alter CDKN2A/B locus function through diverse mechanisms. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine whether the annotated risk variants in the CDKN2A/B locus affect the susceptibility of B cell precursor ALL (B-ALL) in our Spanish population and explore if other SNPs altering additional regulatory mechanisms could be also involved. We analyzed the four SNPs proposed by GWAs and two additional SNPs in miRNA binding sites in 217 pediatric patients with B-ALL and 330 healthy controls. The SNPs rs2811712, rs3731249, rs3217992 and rs2811709 were associated with B-ALL susceptibility in our Spanish population. ALL subtypes analyses showed that rs2811712 was associated with B-hyperdiploid ALL. These results provide evidence for the influence of genetic variants at CDKN2A/B locus with the risk of developing B-ALL.
Introduction
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common childhood malignancy [1, 2]. The genetic basis of ALL susceptibility is broadly supported by its association with certain congenital disorders [3] and, more recently, by genome-wide association studies (GWAS). The two first GWAS independently identified three loci associated with childhood ALL susceptibility: 10q21.2 (ARID5B), 7p12.2 (IKZF1) [4, 5] and 14q11.2 (CEBPE) [5], results widely validated [3, 6–8]. Some of these loci were associated with specific genetic subtypes of ALL, such as locus 10q21.2 (ARID5B) and B-hyperdiploid ALL [4, 5]. Subsequent GWAS discovered additional susceptibility loci at 10p12.2 (BMI1-PIP4K2A) [3], validated in some populations [9], but not in others [10], and 9p21.3 (CDKN2A/B)[11], a region that comprises the tumor suppressors genes CDKN2A and CDKN2B and a long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) known as ANRIL.
The region 9p21.3 is particularly noteworthy because independent association signals have been recently discovered at this locus in association with B cell precursor ALL (B-ALL) susceptibility. The first variant identified in children from the United Kingdom in 2010 was rs3731217 [11], which is located in intron 1 of CDKN2A. This association was replicated in several populations such as Germany, Canada [11] and France [12], but not in others like Poland [13], Hispanic [14] or Thai population [8]. In 2012, Orsi et al. [12] also associated one variant located in intron 1 of CDKN2A, rs2811709, with B-ALL in French children, a variant in low linkage disequilibrium (LD) with rs3731217 (r2<0.8). Then, in 2015, three independent studies using genotyping and imputation-based fine-mapping, pointed to rs3731249 in exon 2 of CDKN2A as the hit associated variant that conferred high risk for B-ALL in European and Hispanic children [15–17]. Finally, in 2016, Hungate et al., pointed to rs662463 in ANRIL as an independent locus associated with B-ALL susceptibility in European and African-Americans [18].
These variants could alter the locus through diverse mechanisms. The alleles of rs3731217 create two overlapping cis-acting intronic splice enhancer motifs (CCCAGG and CAGTAC) that may regulate alternative splicing of CDKN2A [18]. The SNP rs3731249 is a missense SNP in CDKN2A which produces an alanine-to-threonine change in amino-acid-sequence, resulting in reduced tumor suppressor function of p16INK4A [15]. Interestingly, this SNP is also located in the 3´UTR region of p14ARF, where it creates a binding site for miR-132-5p and miR-4642 [19] and could cause the downregulation of the locus. More than other 40 SNPs in 3´UTR region of CDKN2A and CDKN2B that disrupt or create microRNA (miRNA) binding sites have been described, but studies focused on SNPs in miRNA binding sites are almost absent. Finally, rs662463 in ANRIL regulates CDKN2B expression by disrupting a transcription factor binding site for CEBPB [18].
Therefore, although there is an obvious implication of CDKN2A/B locus in B-ALL susceptibility, the variants annotated by the different studies are different and independent. This may be due to the fact that different variants in each population could alter CDKN2A/B locus function through diverse mechanisms. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the involvement of these variants at CDKN2A/B locus in the susceptibility of B-ALL in our Spanish population and explore if SNPs in miRNA binding sites could be also involved in B-ALL risk.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
The study was approved by the local ethics committee CEIC-E (PI2014039) and was carried out according to the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants, or from their parents, prior to sample collection.
Study participants
A total of 231 European descent children diagnosed with B-ALL between 2000 and 2011 in the Pediatric Oncology Units of four Spanish hospitals (University Hospital Cruces, University Hospital Donostia, University Hospital La Paz and University Hospital Miguel Servet) and 338 unrelated healthy controls were included in this study (Table 1 and S1 Table). This is the sample size approximately needed to obtain a statistical power of 80% in a two sided χ2 test given a significance level of p = 0.05, 1.5 controls per case, a minor allele frequency (MAF) of 10% in the control group, and an Odd Ratio (OR) of approximately 2 [20].
Table 1. Patient characteristics and genetic alterations in the study population.
Patients | Controls | |
---|---|---|
No. of individuals | 231 | 338 |
Mean age ± SE, y | 4.04 ± 3.61 | 57.8 ± 28.1 |
Age range, y | 1–16 | 21–101 |
Sexa | ||
Males, n (%) | 128 (55.7) | 157 (46.4) |
Females, n (%) | 102 (44.3) | 181 (53.6) |
Genetic alterationsb | ||
Hyperdiploid | 56 (24.2) | - |
ETV6-RUNX1 | 37 (16.0) | - |
MLL | 13 (5.6) | - |
BCR-ABL | 6 (2.6) | - |
E2A-PBX1 | 6 (2.6) | - |
Hypodiploid | 2 (0.9) | - |
Other | 1 (0.4) | - |
No alteration | 95 (41.1) | - |
Not available | 21 (9.1) | - |
SE: standard error, y: years
a There is no data for one patient.
bSix patients have more than one alteration
Data were collected objectively, blinded to genotypes, from the patients’ medical files. The two most common ALL subtypes, B-lineage hyperdiploid ALL with more than 50 chromosomes (B-hyperdiploid ALL) and B-lineage ALL bearing the t(12;21)(p13;q22) translocation leading to an ETV6-RUNX1 gene fusion, were also analyzed. The other subtypes were not considered due to the low number of patients in our cohort. Sex and age data were systematically recorded (Table 1).
Selection of polymorphisms
A total of six SNPs at the locus 9p21.3 were selected (S2 Table). Selection was done based on the following criteria: “(i) four SNPs previously reported to be highly associated with ALL susceptibility in the literature. Due to design options, for some of them we selected SNPs in high LD defined using the International HapMap Project (release #24; http://hapmap.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) (The HapMap Data Coordination Center (DCC), Bethesda, MD) and Haploview software v.4.2 (http://www.broad.mit.edu/mpg/haploview/) (Broad Institute, Cambridge, USA) with an r2 threshold of 0.8. (ii) SNPs in miRNA binding sites of 3´UTR region of CDKN2A and CDKN2B with a MAF>10% identified using bioinformatics tools: Ensembl (http://www.ensembl.org/) (Welcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK), and miRNASNP (http://bioinfo.life.hust.edu.cn/miRNASNP2/index.php) (College of Life Science and Technology, HUST). Of 47 SNPs identified in the 3´UTR region that disrupt or create miRNA binding sites (S3 Table), only two had a MAF>10%.
Genotype analyses
Genomic DNA was extracted from remission peripheral blood or bone marrow using the phenol-chloroform method as previously described [21]. DNA was quantified using PicoGreen (Invitrogen Corp., Carlsbad, CA).
For each sample, 400 ng of DNA were genotyped using the GoldenGate Genotyping Assay with Veracode technology according to the published Illumina protocol. Data were analyzed with GenomeStudio software for genotype clustering and calling. Duplicate samples and CEPH trios (Coriell Cell Repository, Camden, NJ) were genotyped across the plates. For rs3731249, the genotyping analyses were performed by using PCR followed by restriction analysis with BstUI enzyme. Duplicates were included in each assay. The PCR products were visualized after electrophoresis on 3% agarose gels. Primer sequences and PCR conditions are described in detail in S4 Table.
Statistical analysis
To identify any deviation in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) for the healthy controls, a χ2 test was used. The association between genetic polymorphisms in cases and controls, as well as ALL subtypes and controls, was also evaluated using the χ2 or Fisher’s exact test. The effect sizes of the associations were estimated by the odds ratio from univariate logistic regression. The most significant test among codominant, dominant, recessive, and additive genetic models was selected. The results were adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR)[22]. In all cases, the significance level was set at 5%.
Results
Genotyping results
A total of 231 patients with B-ALL and 338 unrelated healthy controls were available for genotyping with GoldenGate Genotyping Assay. Successful genotyping was achieved for 217 patients with B-ALL and 330 controls (96.1%). Of the SNPs, 5/5 (rs2811712, rs3217992, rs2811709, rs3731222 and rs1063192) were genotyped satisfactorily (95.6%, 95.3%, 85.4%, 95.3% and 95.6%, respectively). For rs3731249, 180 patients with B-ALL and 235 controls were available for genotyping with a genotyping rate of 97.6%. All of them were in HWE in the control cohort.
Genotype association study of B-ALL
Of the 6 SNPs analyzed, we found 4 significantly associated with B-ALL risk (Table 2 and S1 Fig). From them, rs2811712 at CDKN2B displayed the most significant value under the log-additive genetic model (AA vs AG vs GG). The GG genotype showed a 1.98-fold increased risk of B-ALL (95% CI: 1.39–2.82; P = 0.0001). The second most significant association signal was found for rs3731249 at CDKN2A. In this case, the CT/TT genotypes produced a 2.61-fold increased risk of B-ALL (95% CI: 1.38–4.92; P = 0.002). We also found AA genotype of rs3217992 associated with a decreased risk of B-ALL (OR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.36–0.88; P = 0.009). Finally, rs2811709 AG/AA genotypes were associated with a 1.7-fold increased risk of B-ALL. All the SNPs remained statistically associated with B-ALL risk after FDR correction. The SNPs rs3731222 and rs1063192 were not associated with B-ALL susceptibility in our population.
Table 2. Association results of SNPs in CDKN2A/B and B-ALL.
Gene | Genotype | N (controls) | N(cases) | OR (CI 95%) | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNP | (N = 330) | (N = 217) | |||
ANRIL | AA | 264 (80.2) | 143 (66.5) | Additive | 0.0001 a |
rs2811712 | AG | 62 (18.8) | 64 (29.8) | 1.98 (1.39–2.82) | (0.0006) |
GG | 3 (0.9) | 8 (3.7) | |||
A | 590 (89.7) | 350 (81.4) | 1.98 (1.39–2.81) | 0.0001 a | |
G | 68 (10.3) | 80 (18.6) | (0.0006) | ||
CDKN2A | CC | 217 (92.7) | 142 (83) | Dominant | 0.002 a |
rs3731249 | CT | 16 (6.8) | 28 (16.4) | 2.61 (1.38–4.92) | (0.006) |
TT | 1 (0.4) | 1 (0.6) | |||
C | 450 (96.2) | 312 (91.2) | 2.4 (1.31–4.38) | 0.004 a | |
T | 18 (3.8) | 30 (8.8) | (0.012) | ||
CDKN2B, ANRIL | GG | 95 (28.9) | 72 (33.8) | Recessive | 0.009 a |
rs3217992 | AG | 153 (46.5) | 108 (50.7) | 0.56 (0.36–0.88) | (0.018) |
AA | 81 (24.6) | 33 (15.5) | |||
G | 343 (52.1) | 252 (59.2) | 0.75 (0.58–0.96) | 0.023 a | |
A | 315 (47.9) | 174 (40.8) | (0.034) | ||
CDKN2A | GG | 203 (79.6) | 145 (69.7) | Dominant | 0.014 a |
rs2811709 | AG | 49 (19.2) | 59 (28.4) | 1.7 (1.11–2.59) | (0.021) |
AA | 3 (1.2) | 4 (1.9) | |||
G | 455 (89.2) | 349 (83.9) | 1.58 (1.08–2.32) | 0.017 a | |
A | 55 (10.8) | 67 (16.1) | (0.034) | ||
CDKN2A | AA | 246 (74.8) | 165 (77.5) | Dominant | 0.47 |
rs3731222 | AG | 78 (23.7) | 44 (20.7) | 0.86 (0.57–1.29) | |
GG | 5 (1.5) | 4 (1.9) | |||
A | 570 (86.6) | 374 (87.8) | 0.9 (0.62–1.29) | 0.57 | |
G | 88 (13.4) | 52 (12.2) | |||
CDKN2B, ANRIL | TT | 125 (38.1) | 86 (39.8) | Dominant | 0.68 |
rs1063192 | CT | 162 (49.4) | 98 (45.4) | 0.93 (0.65–1.32) | |
CC | 41 (12.5) | 32 (14.8) | |||
T | 412 (62.8) | 270 (62.5) | 1.01 (0.78–1.3) | 0.91 | |
C | 244 (37.2) | 162 (37.5) |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism
a Significant after FDR correction, the p value is displayed in brackets
Genotype association study of B-ALL subtypes
When we analyzed the 6 SNPs considering B-hyperdiploid ALL and ETV-RUNX1 ALL subtype, we found association between TT genotype of rs3731249 and B-hyperdiploid ALL (OR:2.62; 95% CI:1.06–6.48; P = 0.048), AA genotype of rs3217992 with ETV6-RUNX1 ALL (OR:0.58; 95% CI:0.34–0.96; P = 0.03) and GG genotype of rs2811712 with both B-hyperdiploid ALL (OR:8.69; 95% CI:1.89–40.0; P = 0.007) and ETV6-RUNX1 ALL (OR:2.4; 95% CI:1.15–5.02; P = 0.024) (Table 3). After FDR correction, the association between rs2811712 and B-hyperdiploid ALL remained statistically significant (p = 0.042).
Table 3. Association results of SNPs in CDKN2A/B and B-hyperdiploid ALL and ETV6-RUNX1 ALL.
B-hyperdiploid ALL | ETV6-RUNX1 ALL | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gene | Genotype | N (controls) | N (cases) | OR (CI 95%) | P | N (cases) | OR (CI 95%) | P |
SNP | (N = 330) | (N = 54) | (N = 37) | |||||
ANRIL | AA | 264 (80.2) | 40 (74.1) | Recessive | 0.007a | 22 (62.9) | Dominant | 0.024 |
rs2811712 | AG | 62 (18.8) | 10 (18.5) | 8.69 (1.89–40.0) | (0.048) | 12 (34.3) | 2.4 (1.15–5.02) | |
GG | 3 (0.9) | 4 (7.4) | 1 (2.9) | |||||
A | 590 (91.2) | 90 (90.7) | 1.73 (0.98–3.05) | 0.055 | 56 (80) | 2.16 (1.14–4.1) | 0.017 | |
G | 68 (8.8) | 18 (9.3) | 14 (20) | |||||
CDKN2A | CC | 217 (92.7) | 39 (83) | Dominant | 0.048 | 28 (90.3) | Dominant | 0.64 |
rs3731249 | CT | 16 (6.8) | 8 (17) | 2.62 (1.06–6.48) | 3 (9.7) | 1.37 (0.38–4.96) | ||
TT | 1 (0.4) | 0 | 0 | |||||
C | 450 (96.2) | 86 (91.5) | 2.32 (0.98–5.51) | 0.55 | 59 (95.2) | 1.27 (0.36–4.44) | 0.70 | |
T | 18 (3.8) | 8 (8.5) | 3 (4.8) | |||||
CDKN2A | GG | 203 (79.6) | 38 (70.4) | Additive | 0.06 | 23 (67.6) | Dominant | 0.12 |
rs2811709 | AG | 49 (19.2) | 13 (24.1) | 1.72 (0.98–3.01) | 11 (32.4) | 1.87 (0.86–4.07) | ||
AA | 3 (1.2) | 3 (5.6) | 0 | |||||
G | 455 (89.2) | 89 (82.4) | 1.76 (0.99–3.11) | 0.05 | 57 (83.8) | 1.59 (0.79–3.22) | 0.19 | |
A | 55 (10.8) | 19 (17.6) | 11 (16.2) | |||||
CDKN2B, ANRIL | TT | 125 (38.1) | 23 (42.6) | Dominant | 0.53 | 12 (34.3) | Dominant | 0.65 |
rs1063192 | CT | 162 (49.4) | 24 (44.4) | 0.83 (0.46–1.49) | 17 (48.6) | 1.18 (0.57–2.46) | ||
CC | 41 (12.5) | 7 (13) | 6 (17.1) | |||||
T | 412 (62.8) | 70 (64.8) | 0.91 (0.59–1.4) | 0.68 | 41 (58.8) | 1.19 (0.72–1.97) | 0.48 | |
C | 244 (37.2) | 38 (35.2) | 29 (41.4) | |||||
CDKN2A | AA | 246 (74.8) | 41 (77.4) | Dominant | 0.68 | 27 (77.1) | Dominant | 0.75 |
rs3731222 | AG | 78 (23.7) | 12 (22.6) | 0.87 (0.44–1.73) | 7 (20) | 0.88 (0.38–2.01) | ||
GG | 5 (1.5) | 0 | 1 (2.9) | |||||
A | 570 (86.6) | 94 (88.7) | 0.82 (0.43–1.57) | 0.56 | 61 (87.1) | 0.95 (0.45–1.99) | 0.90 | |
G | 88 (13.4) | 12 (11.3) | 9 (12.9) | |||||
CDKN2B, ANRIL | GG | 95 (28.9) | 17 (31.5) | Recessive | 0.93 | 15 (44.1) | Aditive | 0.030 |
rs3217992 | AG | 153 (46.5) | 24 (44.4) | 0.97 (0.5–1.9) | 15 (44.1) | 0.58 (0.34–0.96) | ||
AA | 81 (24.6) | 13 (24.1) | 4 (11.8) | |||||
G | 343 (52.1) | 58 (53.7) | 0.93 (0.62–1.41) | 0.76 | 45 (66.2) | 0.55 (0.32–0.94) | 0.028 | |
A | 315 (47.9) | 50 (46.3) | 23 (33.8) |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism
a Significant after FDR correction, the p value is displayed in brackets
Discussion
In the current study, we analyzed 6 SNPs at the CDKN2A/B locus in 217 children with B-ALL and 330 controls in a Spanish cohort. SNPs rs2811712, rs3731249, rs3217992 and rs2811709 were associated with B-ALL susceptibility. In the subtype analysis, rs2811712 was associated with the risk of developing B-hyperdiploid ALL.
The most significant finding was the association between GG genotype of rs2811712 and the increased risk of developing B-ALL (p = 10−4). This result is in line with most of the studies [9, 11, 14, 18]. The SNP rs2811712 is in strong LD with two of the previously reported SNPs, rs17756311 (r2 = 0.83) and rs662463 (r2 = 1), both associated with B-ALL risk in European Americans [3, 18] and African Americans [18], respectively. In the subtype analysis, GG genotype of rs2811712 was also associated with B-hyperdiploid ALL after FDR correction, result that is in line with Chokkalingam et al ‘study performed in Hispanics [14]. These associations could be explained considering that rs2811712 is located in intron 1 of the lncRNA ANRIL. SNPs in lncRNAs may affect its expression or its structure by interfering with lncRNA folding or by modulating protein-lncRNA interactions [23]. ANRIL has been shown to regulate CDKN2A and CDKN2B genes. Specifically, acting in cis, ANRIL binds various Polycomb proteins resulting in histone modification of the CDKN2A/CDKN2B locus, and in turn, silencing the cluster [24]. In fact, the G allele of rs2811712 was shown to decrease CDKN2B mRNA levels [25]. Therefore, the G allele of rs2811712 in ANRIL could be involved in the downregulation of the locus, contributing to increased susceptibility to B-ALL.
The second most significant association was found for the CT/TT genotypes of rs3731249, which produced a 2.6-fold increased risk of B-ALL (P = 0.002). This association was also described recently by 3 independent studies, all of them pointing out the high impact of this variant, since it confers in all studies between two and three-fold increased risk of B-ALL susceptibility in children of European and Hispanic origin [15–17]. Rs3731249 localizes to exon 2 of CDKN2A, being shared by both p16INK4A and p14ARF, the tumor suppressors codified by CDKN2A. For the p16INK4A, the C-to-T nucleotide substitution resulted in an alanine-to-threonine change (p.A148T). There is evidence that the variant p16INK4A (p.148T) is preferentially retained in the nucleus, compromising its ability to inhibit CDK4 and CDK6 in the cytoplasm [15] and favoring proliferation, and therefore contributing to the association with ALL risk. In p14ARF, rs3731249 is in the 3´UTR region, where the risk allele creates a miRNA binding site for miR-132-5p and miR-4642 [19]. These miRNAs could downregulate p14ARF expression, and then, attenuate its function as cyclin inhibitor. Therefore, T allele of rs3731249 in CDKN2A could be involved in B-ALL through its effect on the function of both p16INK4A and p14ARF.
The third finding was the association between the AA genotype of rs3217992 and a decreased B-ALL risk. This SNP is located in a miRNA binding site in CDKN2B in which the A allele disrupts the binding for miR-138 and miR-205 [26]. The loss of binding of these miRNAs could increase the expression of the tumor suppressor CDKN2B, explaining its protective role. As far as we know, this is the first time that this SNP is associated with B-ALL risk.
Regarding rs2811709, AG/AA genotypes were associated with an increased risk of B-ALL susceptibility in our population. This SNP was also associated with B-ALL risk in two previous studies of children of European origin [11, 12]. rs2811709 is a cis-eQTL for CDKN2B, with a decreased expression of CDKN2B mRNA for the risk allele [25], which could describe the involvement of rs2811709 in B-ALL.
On the other hand, we found no association between rs3731222 and rs1063192 and B-ALL susceptibility. One of them, rs3731222, is in high LD with rs3731217 (r2 = 1), the SNP identified in the work performed by Sherborne et al. [11] and replicated in several studies [9, 12]. However, we and others could not replicate this association [8, 13]. This lack of replication could be due to differences in the variants that are involved in the disease in the different populations.
Finally, this study has some limitations that might be addressed, such as the small sample size compared to other replication studies (13, 14). However, when we calculated the sample size needed to obtain an 80% of statistical power using the software OpenEpi [20] the estimated size was similar to our cohort. Another limitation could be that the putative function of miRNA binding site disruption was predicted by in silico tools, but nowadays, the possible inaccuracy of the prediction algorithms of the databases used has to be assumed.
In conclusion, three of the variants previously proposed by the literature, rs2811712, rs3731249 and rs2811709, and a new variant, rs3217992, were associated with B-ALL susceptibility in our Spanish cohort. These results confirmed the implication of CDKN2A/B locus in the development of B-ALL since all these SNPs could act through different mechanisms that might alter the cluster. The identification of the specific causes that could lead to the development of B-ALL is clearly a worthwhile goal for prevention or early intervention of this disease.
Supporting information
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the Basque Government (IT661-13, IT989-16), UPV/EHU (UFI11/35). AGC was supported by a pre-doctoral grant from the Basque Government. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Pui CH, Evans WE. Treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(2):166–78. 10.1056/NEJMra052603 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Greaves M. Infection, immune responses and the aetiology of childhood leukaemia. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6(3):193–203. 10.1038/nrc1816 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Xu H, Yang W, Perez-Andreu V, Devidas M, Fan Y, Cheng C, et al. Novel Susceptibility Variants at 10p12.31–12.2 for Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Ethnically Diverse Populations. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Treviño LR, Yang W, French D, Hunger SP, Carroll WL, Devidas M, et al. Germline genomic variants associated with childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Genet. 2009;41(9):1001–5. 10.1038/ng.432 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Papaemmanuil E, Hosking FJ, Vijayakrishnan J, Price A, Olver B, Sheridan E, et al. Loci on 7p12.2, 10q21.2 and 14q11.2 are associated with risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Genet. 2009;41(9):1006–10. 10.1038/ng.430 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gutiérrez-Camino Á, López-López E, Martín-Guerrero I, Sánchez-Toledo J, García de Andoin N, Carboné Bañeres A, et al. Intron 3 of the ARID5B gene: a hot spot for acute lymphoblastic leukemia susceptibility. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013;139(11):1879–86. 10.1007/s00432-013-1512-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Prasad RB, Hosking FJ, Vijayakrishnan J, Papaemmanuil E, Koehler R, Greaves M, et al. Verification of the susceptibility loci on 7p12.2, 10q21.2, and 14q11.2 in precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia of childhood. Blood. 2010;115(9):1765–7. 10.1182/blood-2009-09-241513 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Vijayakrishnan J, Sherborne AL, Sawangpanich R, Hongeng S, Houlston RS, Pakakasama S. Variation at 7p12.2 and 10q21.2 influences childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia risk in the Thai population and may contribute to racial differences in leukemia incidence. Leuk Lymphoma. 2010;51(10):1870–4. 10.3109/10428194.2010.511356 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Migliorini G, Fiege B, Hosking FJ, Ma Y, Kumar R, Sherborne AL, et al. Variation at 10p12.2 and 10p14 influences risk of childhood B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and phenotype. Blood. 2013;122(19):3298–307. 10.1182/blood-2013-03-491316 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lopez-Lopez E, Gutierrez-Camino A, Martin-Guerrero I, Garcia-Orad A. Re: novel susceptibility variants at 10p12.31–12.2 for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in ethnically diverse populations. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105(19):1512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sherborne AL, Hosking FJ, Prasad RB, Kumar R, Koehler R, Vijayakrishnan J, et al. Variation in CDKN2A at 9p21.3 influences childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia risk. Nat Genet. 2010;42(6):492–4. 10.1038/ng.585 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Orsi L, Rudant J, Bonaventure A, Goujon-Bellec S, Corda E, Evans TJ, et al. Genetic polymorphisms and childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: GWAS of the ESCALE study (SFCE). Leukemia. 2012;26(12):2561–4. 10.1038/leu.2012.148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pastorczak A, Górniak P, Sherborne A, Hosking F, Trelińska J, Lejman M, et al. Role of 657del5 NBN mutation and 7p12.2 (IKZF1), 9p21 (CDKN2A), 10q21.2 (ARID5B) and 14q11.2 (CEBPE) variation and risk of childhood ALL in the Polish population. Leuk Res. 2011;35(11):1534–6. 10.1016/j.leukres.2011.07.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chokkalingam AP, Hsu LI, Metayer C, Hansen HM, Month SR, Barcellos LF, et al. Genetic variants in ARID5B and CEBPE are childhood ALL susceptibility loci in Hispanics. Cancer Causes Control. 2013;24(10):1789–95. 10.1007/s10552-013-0256-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Xu H, Zhang H, Yang W, Yadav R, Morrison AC, Qian M, et al. Inherited coding variants at the CDKN2A locus influence susceptibility to acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in children. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7553 10.1038/ncomms8553 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Walsh KM, de Smith AJ, Hansen HM, Smirnov IV, Gonseth S, Endicott AA, et al. A Heritable Missense Polymorphism in CDKN2A Confers Strong Risk of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Is Preferentially Selected during Clonal Evolution. Cancer Res. 2015;75(22):4884–94. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-1105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Vijayakrishnan J, Henrion M, Moorman AV, Fiege B, Kumar R, da Silva Filho MI, et al. The 9p21.3 risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia is explained by a rare high-impact variant in CDKN2A. Sci Rep. 2015;5:15065 10.1038/srep15065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hungate EA, Vora SR, Gamazon ER, Moriyama T, Best T, Hulur I, et al. A variant at 9p21.3 functionally implicates CDKN2B in paediatric B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia aetiology. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10635 10.1038/ncomms10635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gong J, Tong Y, Zhang HM, Wang K, Hu T, Shan G, et al. Genome-wide identification of SNPs in microRNA genes and the SNP effects on microRNA target binding and biogenesis. Hum Mutat. 2012;33(1):254–63. 10.1002/humu.21641 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sullivan KM, Dean A, Soe MM. OpenEpi: a web-based epidemiologic and statistical calculator for public health. Public Health Rep. 2009;124(3):471–4. 10.1177/003335490912400320 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sambrook J, Russell DW. Preparation and Analysis of Eukaryotic Genomic DNA Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual. 1 3rd edition ed Cold Spring Harbor, USA: CSHL Press; 2001. p. 4–12. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Royal Stat; 1995. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Boon RA, Jaé N, Holdt L, Dimmeler S. Long Noncoding RNAs: From Clinical Genetics to Therapeutic Targets? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(10):1214–26. 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.12.051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Meseure D, Vacher S, Drak Alsibai K, Nicolas A, Chemlali W, Caly M, et al. Expression of ANRIL—Polycomb Complexes—CDKN2A/B/ARF Genes in Breast Tumors: Identification of a Two-gene (EZH2/CBX7) Signature with Independent Prognostic Value. Mol Cancer Res. 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Consortium G. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. Nat Genet. 2013;45(6):580–5. 10.1038/ng.2653 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gong J, Liu C, Liu W, Wu Y, Ma Z, Chen H, et al. An update of miRNASNP database for better SNP selection by GWAS data, miRNA expression and online tools. Database (Oxford). 2015;2015:bav029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.