Abstract
The treatment of metastatic androgen-resistant prostate cancer remains a challenge. We describe a protein vector that selectively delivers synthetic dsRNA, polyinosinic/polycytidylic acid (polyIC), to prostate tumors by targeting prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA), which is overexpressed on the surface of prostate cancer cells.
The chimeric protein is built from the double stranded RNA (dsRNA) binding domain of PKR tethered to a single chain anti-PSMA antibody. When complexed with polyIC, the chimera demonstrates selective and efficient killing of prostate cancer cells. The treatment causes the targeted cancer cells to undergo apoptosis and to secrete toxic cytokines. In a bystander effect, these cytokines kill neighboring cancer cells that do not necessarily overexpress PSMA, and activate immune cells that enhance the killing effect. The strong effects of the targeted polyIC are demonstrated on both 2D cell cultures and 3D tumor spheroids.
Keywords: PSMA, polyIC, dsRNA binding domain, ScFvJ591
INTRODUCTION
Prostate cancer is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide, accounting for over 25% of new cancer cases diagnosed annually among men in the US [1]. Patients with metastatic prostate cancer are usually treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). While ADT generally achieves short-term remission, patients typically develop castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). There is a great demand for novel therapies for CRPC patients, as these patients rarely respond to existing therapies and demonstrate median survival of about 3 years [2–4].
Current targeted cancer therapies delay, but rarely prevent, tumor progression. As tumor cells are genomically unstable, they eventually acquire mutations and genetic alterations that allow them to evade the therapy and develop resistance [5–7]. The rate of killing elicited by targeted agents is too slow, allowing the tumors to adapt to the therapy [8–10]. Additionally, tumors are heterogeneous and possess a number of different subpopulations [11–13]. Targeted therapies are directed at specific subpopulations, and therefore cannot be expected to eradicate the entire tumor. We believe that an effective targeted therapy must kill the multiple sub-populations of the tumor simultaneously and rapidly, to preclude the development of resistance.
We have recently developed a new and promising strategy to develop such anti-cancer agents. Our strategy is to deliver synthetic dsRNA, polyinosine/polycytosine acid (polyIC), specifically into cancer cells. In cells, polyIC mimics dsRNA viruses, invoking anti-viral defense systems that cause cellular apoptosis and trigger an innate immune response. Thus, specific delivery of polyIC into cancer cells leads to massive killing of the targeted cancer cells, and provokes an innate immune response against neighboring, untargeted cancer cells. The rapid destruction of tumors and the concurrent use of multiple killing pathways increase treatment robustness and impede the development of drug resistance. Specific delivery of polyIC is achieved by attaching polyIC molecules to a targeting ligand, which homes to a receptor that is overexpressed on the surface of the cancer cell. Receptor overexpression provides treatment selectivity, by discriminating between cancer and non-cancer cells.
The secretion of cytokines and chemokines in response to the presence of polyIC leads to “bystander effects”, i.e. the killing of neighboring untargeted tumor cells. Thus, the treatment is potent even against heterogeneous tumors [14]. We define two types of bystander effects: (1) A direct bystander effect, whereby toxic cytokines secreted from the targeted cancer cells lead to the activation of apoptotic pathways in neighboring, untargeted cancer cells; (2) An immune-cell-mediated bystander effect, whereby chemokines secreted from targeted cancer cells recruit and activate immune cells, enhancing the killing of neighboring, untargeted cancer cells.
Metastatic CRPC typically presents a unique cell surface molecule that can be exploited for targeted therapy: prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA). PSMA is overexpressed at levels of up to 1000-fold at all Gleason scores [15, 16], while overexpression increases with tumor progression [17, 18]. Despite the heterogeneous nature of the disease, primary tumors or metastases that are completely PSMA-negative are rare [19]. While the above findings support the notion that PSMA is a highly promising therapeutic target, no PSMA-targeted therapies are currently approved for clinical use. However, a few agents are in clinical trials [20–23]. PSMA behaves like a classical receptor, exhibiting rapid internalization and recycling upon ligand binding [24]. Thus, a therapeutic entity can be coupled to a PSMA ligand and internalized into prostate cancer cells. Indeed, a variety of PSMA-targeting ligands are being investigated for tumor imaging [25–27] and for the development of PSMA-targeted therapeutic agents [28–31].
In our laboratory we have developed chemical vectors to deliver polyIC to EGFR-overexpressing glioblastoma [32], breast cancer and vulval carcinoma [14], as well as HER-2-overexpressing breast cancer [33]. The targeted polyIC proved to be extremely efficient at killing tumors in vitro and in vivo, leading in some cases to complete tumor eradication [14, 32].
Herein we present a protein alternative, rather than a chemical vector, to target PolyIC to prostate cancer. A protein vector offers multiple advantages over the use of a complex polymeric chemical vector. Since it is composed of humanized proteins, the likelihood of immune response is significantly diminished. The protein has a precise structure, defined by the recombinant gene from which it is expressed, which increases its chances of meeting the requirements of clinical development and regulatory approval processes [34]. Our protein vector, dsRB-SCP (dsRB-Arg9-ScFvJ591), is a chimeric protein that comprises: (a) a polyIC-binding moiety, consisting of two dsRNA binding domains (dsRBD) derived from human dsRNA-activated protein kinase (PKR); (b) a nine residue arginine linker (Arg9), to facilitate endosomal escape following endocytosis, in accordance with the findings of He et al.[35, 36]; (c) a specific targeting moiety, consisting of anti-PSMA single-chain antibody, ScFvJ591 [29, 37]. We show that dsRB-SCP successfully binds polyIC and elicits a powerful and selective killing effect on PSMA-overexpressing prostate cancer cells.
RESULTS
ScFvJ591 selectively targets PSMA-overexpressing prostate cancer cells and efficiently internalizes into the cells
We first tested whether the single chain antibody ScFvJ591 [29] could be used as a homing ligand, as part of a chimeric protein. We generated pGFP-Arg9-ScFvJ591, encoding GFP as a tracking marker fused to the single chain antibody against PSMA, ScFvJ591. The GFP and ScFv moieties are connected by a linker encoding an endosomal escape sequence (Figure 1A). The 56kDa recombinant protein, GFP-SCP (GFP-Arg9-ScFvJ591), was expressed in E. coli and purified in a 3-step purification process, consisting of affinity purification followed by two steps of gel filtration (Experimental Procedures).
We examined the selectivity of GFP-SCP using confocal microscopy. We incubated the chimeric protein with LNCaP cells, which overexpress PSMA, and analyzed binding after 5 hours. PC3 and MCF7 cells, which do not express PSMA, served as negative controls. The confocal images demonstrated that GFP-SCP bound to LNCaP cells and was internalized, while no binding was evident to PC3 or MCF7 cells (Figure 1B). We next compared the uptake of GFP-SCP into LNCaP and MCF7 cells using flow cytometry. The accumulation of GFP-SCP was indicated by the fluorescence shift. As expected, the observed fluorescence levels correlated with the concentration of GFP-SCP (200nM versus 400 nM) and the incubation period (30 minutes versus 60 minutes) (Figure 1C). These results suggest time-dependent and dose-dependent internalization of GFP-SCP. In contrast, in MCF7 cells, which lack PSMA, no accumulation of GFP-SCP was observed (Figure 1C).
To monitor the localization of GFP-SCP, we incubated LNCaP cells with GFP-SCP and observed them using live-cell confocal microscopy. Initially, GFP-SCP fluorescence was confined to the cell surface and no free diffusion was observed (Figure 1D). Minutes later, GFP-SCP entered the cell via endocytosis, as indicated by the appearance of small intracellular punctate structures (Figure 1D). Over time, these structures increased in number. Eventually, the fluorescence became more diffuse (Figure 1D), suggesting that the GFP might have escaped from the endosome and diffused to the cytosol. The accumulation of the GFP inside the cell increased linearly over the first 40 minutes after binding (Figure 1D). Thus, GFP-SCP was taken up quickly and selectively by PSMA-overexpressing cells.
Production of a chimeric protein to deliver polyIC selectively to PSMA-overexpressing prostate cancer cells
Once we had verified that the single chain antibody ScFvJ591 could specifically target PSMA-overexpressing cells, we designed a chimeric protein in which ScFvJ591 was fused with the two dsRNA-binding domains (dsRBD) of the human dsRNA-dependent protein kinase, PKR (Figure 2A). The 48kDa chimeric protein, dsRB-SCP (dsRB-Arg9-ScFvJ591), was expressed in E. coli, purified on nickel sepharose as a partially unfolded protein, refolded on the column, eluted and submitted to ion exchange, as described in the experimental procedures (Figure 2B).
To evaluate binding to dsRNA, dsRB-SCP was incubated with dsRNA of defined length (500 bp) and the mixture was electrophoresed on an agarose gel. The electrophoresis of dsRNA that was incubated with dsRB-SCP at physiologic pH was retarded in a dose-dependent manner, relative to the naked dsRNA control (Figure 2C), confirming that the chimeric protein bound the dsRNA. On the other hand, dsRNA that was incubated with dsRB-SCP at acidic pH migrated like naked dsRNA (Figure 2C). This indicates that the affinity of dsRB-SCP for dsRNA is low under acidic conditions, suggesting that dsRB-SCP can release its dsRNA cargo upon reaching the acidic environment of the endosome. The dsRB-SCP/polyIC complexes were visualized by cryo-transmission electron microscopy as distinct elongated structures, reminiscent of beads on a filament (Supplementary Figure 1). Similar structures were observed by Peisley et al., who looked at complexes of dsRNA and MDA5 protein [38]. These data confirm that dsRB-SCP can be used as a vector for dsRNA.
dsRB-SCP complexed with polyIC selectively induces apoptosis in PSMA-overexpressing cells
We next evaluated the killing effect of the dsRB-SCP/polyIC complex using four cell lines: LNCaP and VCaP, which overexpress PSMA, and MCF7 and PC3, which do not express PSMA. Cells that did not express PSMA were not killed by the treatment (Figure 3A). dsRB-SCP selectively delivered polyIC into the PSMA-overexpressing cells (LNCaP and VCaP), killing up to 80% of the cells (Figure 3A). The remaining 20% of LNCaP cells were deemed permanently arrested, as no regrowth was observed 250 hours after washing out the chimera (350 hours after treatment) (Figure 3B). dsRB-SCP/polyIC induced cell death by activating apoptotic pathways, as indicated by the cleavage of caspase-3 and PARP (Figure 3C). In cells treated with polyIC alone, no cleavage of caspase-3 or of PARP was detected (Figure 3C). These data show that dsRB-SCP delivers polyIC selectively into PSMA-overexpressing cells, leading to their apoptosis.
dsRB-SCP/polyIC treatment induces cytokine secretion and chemotaxis of immune cells
The presence of dsRNA inside the cell activates the production of anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic cytokines and chemokines [39]. To determine whether dsRB-SCP/polyIC can trigger similar effects we analyzed the production by LNCaP cells of three major cytokines: IP-10 and RANTES, which are both involved in the chemo-attraction of immune cells, and IFN-β, which plays a key role in the differentiation of immune cells [40]. The secretion of IP-10, RANTES and IFN-β into the medium, as measured by ELISA, was partially induced by polyIC alone, as reported previously [41]. Treatment with dsRB-SCP/polyIC led to a further 2-fold increase in the secretion of all three cytokines (Figure 4A-4C). Similarly, IFN-β expression was not affected by polyIC or dsRB-SCP alone, but treatment with dsRB-SCP/polyIC led to very strong induction of IFN-β expression, as measured by qRT-PCR (Figure 4D).
To study whether the secreted cytokines attract immune cells, we examined whether the medium from dsRB-SCP/polyIC-treated LNCaP cells induced the chemotaxis of freshly isolated PBMCs. Almost four times as many PBMCs migrated towards conditioned medium from dsRB-SCP/polyIC-treated cells as towards medium from untreated cells (Figure 4E). Thus, targeted delivery of polyIC into PSMA-overexpressing cells leads to cytokine secretion and consequent immune cell chemo-attraction.
Powerful bystander effects induced by dsRB-SCP/polyIC
We next tested whether the recruited immune cells could evoke an immune-cell-mediated bystander effect. We treated LNCaP-Luc/GFP cells, which stably express luciferase, with a low dose of dsRB-SCP/polyIC, followed by co-incubation with PBMCs. Luciferase activity served to measure the viability of the LNCaP-Luc/GFP cells. At the low doses used here, luciferase activity was barely affected when PBMCs were absent. In contrast, when PBMCs were added, the LNCaP-Luc/GFP cells were eradicated (Figure 5A). These results suggest that dsRB-SCP/polyIC induces a powerful bystander effect, mediated by immune cells among the PBMCs.
To evaluate whether dsRB-SCP/polyIC also induces a direct bystander effect, LNCaP cells were co-incubated with PC3-Luc/GFP cells, which do not express PSMA. dsRB-SCP/polyIC treatment resulted in the killing of up to 60% of the PC3-Luc/GFP cells (Figure 5B). Since PC3-Luc/GFP cells are not targeted by dsRB-SCP/polyIC (Figure 5B), we infer that the death of these cells is the result of a direct bystander effect elicited by the dsRB-SCP/polyIC-targeted LNCaP cells. The addition of human PBMCs to this co-culture system led to a significant increase in the killing rate of the PC3-Luc/GFP cells (Figure 5B), indicating that the direct and indirect bystander effects both operate under these conditions.
dsRB-SCP/polyIC destroys tumor spheroids
In vitro 3D models display some elements of the architecture of human tumors [42] and feature high resistance to anti-cancer drugs [43]. We therefore evaluated the efficacy of dsRB-SCP/polyIC in a 3D tumor spheroid model. LNCaP spheroids were generated and allowed to reach a diameter of 300-400 μm. The spheroids were then transferred to polyHEMA-coated plates and treated repeatedly with dsRB-SCP/polyIC (400 nM dsRB-SCP, 2.5 μg/ml polyIC) over the course of 5 days. By day 5, the spheroids that were treated with dsRB-SCP/polyIC began to shrink and shed dead cells, while the untreated spheroids continued to grow (Figure 6A). On day 15, the spheroids were stained with calcein AM and propidium iodide to monitor viability (Figure 6A). The dsRB-SCP/polyIC-treated spheroids demonstrated significant structural damage and contained large numbers of dead cells (Figure 6A). In contrast, the untreated spheroids and spheroids treated with only polyIC or only dsRB-SCP, maintained a typical intact structure [23], where the cells at the surface were alive and the cells at the core were necrotic, as indicated by calcein-AM versus propidium iodide staining. (Figure 6A).
To test the immune-cell-mediated bystander effect on the spheroids, we added PBMCs to treated spheroids. LNCaP-Luc/GFP spheroids were treated once with dsRB-SCP/polyIC, and 24 hours later freshly isolated PBMCs were added to the culture. Even at the lowest dose of dsRB-SCP/polyIC, spheroid disassembly was already evident 72 hours after the initiation of dsRB-SCP/polyIC treatment (48 hours after PBMC addition) (Figure 6B upper panel). At higher doses, complete spheroid destruction was observed 96 hours after the initiation of the treatment. 72 hours later only dead cells, which showed no GFP fluorescence, were evident (Figure 6B upper panel). In the absence of PBMCs (Supplementary Figure 2), dsRB-SCP/polyIC treatment resulted in visible cell death and disassembly of the spheroid but the effect was weaker than in the presence of PBMCs (Figure 6B lower panel shows endpoint at 168 hours). Thus, dsRB-SCP/polyIC has a potent effect on spheroids, and this effect is greatly magnified by the addition of immune cells.
DISCUSSION
There are currently no effective clinically approved treatment options for CRPC patients [2]. While PSMA is the target of choice for targeted treatment of prostate cancer in general and CRPC tumors in particular [44], no PSMA-targeted drugs have entered the clinic to date. Our therapy utilizes PSMA to facilitate the targeted delivery of polyIC into prostate cancer cells. PolyIC is a well-known anti-tumor immune adjuvant. However, its therapeutic window is limited due to its strong toxic side effects when delivered systemically [45]. By targeting polyIC to the tumor, systemic toxicity can be avoided [14]. Our strategy uses polyIC not only to directly kill cells that overexpress PSMA, but also to activate direct and immune-cell-mediated bystander effects, in order to eradicate heterogeneous tumors.
Our previous studies focused on the use of chemical vectors to target polyIC to EGFR- and HER2-overexpressing cancer cells [14, 33]. Proteins have several potential advantages as therapeutics over chemical compounds, as proteins function in a highly specific manner and feature consistent structures and low immunogenicity [34, 46]. These advantages, as well as recent technical advancements in the field of protein engineering [47], motivated us to develop protein-based drugs. Here, we generated a novel chimeric protein, dsRB-SCP, which can selectively deliver polyIC into PSMA-overexpressing cancer cells.
ScFvJ591 [29], the targeting moiety of our chimeric protein, was derived from the monoclonal antibody (mAb) J591, which recognizes the extracellular domain of PSMA [48]. mAb J591 has been used successfully in clinical studies. As an imaging tracer, mAb J591 linked to radionuclides 89Zr or 111I gave excellent results in the detection of bone lesions [49, 50]. mAb J591 linked to 177Lu was used in radio-immunotherapy to successfully target circulating tumor cells [20, 31]. mAb J591 was used to deliver the cytotoxic drug maytansinoid-1 (DM1) in a phase I clinical trial [21]. In all clinical applications, mAb J591 exhibited low immunogenicity. We chose to use the single-chain version of the full antibody, ScFvJ591, which consists of the variable regions of the heavy (VH) and light (VL) chains of mAb J591, joined together by a flexible peptide linker [29]. This short single-chain version is easier to incorporate than the full antibody into an engineered chimeric protein expressed in bacteria [51]. Our GFP-SCP chimera entered PSMA-overexpressing cells rapidly and selectively, showing that both the single chain ScFvJ591 and the GFP were expressed in active conformations in the context of the recombinant fusion protein. The high specificity and affinity of the ScFvJ591-containing chimeric protein are crucial for a potential therapy.
To construct a chimeric protein that would specifically bind and carry polyIC, we utilized the dsRNA binding domains (dsRBD1 and dsRBD2) isolated from the dsRNA-activated protein kinase (PKR). Previous studies showed that PKR has a high affinity for polyIC [52–54] and that isolated dsRBDs can facilitate the delivery of siRNA into cells [55]. Based on these reports we recently used the isolated dsRBDs to deliver polyIC to EGF-targeted cells successfully [56].
The expression and purification of a correctly folded, active chimeric protein is challenging. Here, we had the additional complication that the dsRB domain binds host nucleic acids [57]. We designed a purification process incorporating an unfolding and re-folding protocol, which successfully released the host nucleic acids [56]. We proved that the dsRB domain was functional using a gel mobility shift assay [58] (Figure 2C). Our purification process successfully generated purified dsRB-SCP with low batch-to-batch variations.
The immunostimulatory effect of polyIC is mainly mediated through the Toll-like Receptor3 (TLR3), which is part of the antiviral defense system. TLR3 is expressed on endosomal membranes and recognizes polyIC extracellularly [59]. Upon internalization, polyIC can escape from the endosomes into the cell cytosol, where it activates additional antiviral defense systems, including PKR, Retinoic acid-Inducible Gene I (RIG-1) and Melanoma Differentiation-Associated gene 5 (MDA5) [60]. To facilitate endosomal escape we inserted a peptide linker consisting of nine arginine residues, between the targeting and the polyIC-binding moieties. We chose the Arg9 peptide for two reasons. First, it is a synthetic derivative of HIV-I Tat protein, which is widely used as a membrane penetrating peptide. The peptide's high positive charge creates strong electrostatic interactions with the endosomal membrane, leading to its puncture [35, 36, 61]. Second, the Arg9 peptide contains a sequence that can be cleaved by furin, an endoprotease that is localized in the endosome [62]. The Arg9 sequence has been used to enable endosomal escape in the development of recombinant immunotoxins, with good results [35, 63].
dsRB-SCP was designed to bind polyIC via the dsRBD moiety, target prostate cancer cells using the ScFvJ591 moiety, and then release the polyIC cargo inside the endosome. To verify that the particles were small enough to enter the endosome (less than 200 nm, according to Rejman et al. [64]), the complex was examined using cryo-transmission electron microscopy (Supplementary Figure 1). The acidic environment of the endosome influences the electrostatic interactions between the charged residues in the binding domain, as was shown with other dsRNA binding proteins[65]. dsRB-SCP achieved high killing efficiency using low doses of polyIC (Figure 3A), which were ineffective in the absence of dsRB-SCP (Figure 3A). Paone et al. succeeded in triggering apoptosis in LNCaP cells using 10-fold higher doses of naked PolyIC [66]. dsRB-SCP/polyIC triggered apoptosis specifically in PSMA-overexpressing cells within hours after internalization (Figure 3), fulfilling the criteria for effective therapy of selective and rapid action.
In addition to launching a strong direct attack on the targeted PSMA-overexpressing cancer cells, the strategy described here invokes a holistic approach to targeted therapy. Unlike kinase inhibitors, for example, which inhibit one or a small number of specific cancer driver molecules [67, 68], our therapy induces bystander effects that: (1) activate multiple killing pathways at the same time, thus preventing targeted cells from developing resistance and, (2) kill neighboring tumor cell sub-populations, overcoming the heterogeneous nature of tumors. These pathways activate the secretion of toxic cytokines (inducing a direct bystander effect) and the adaptive immune response (inducing an indirect, immune-cell-mediated bystander effect) [60]. The bystander effects are mediated by the induction of cytokines such as IFN-β (Figure 4C-4D), and chemokines such as IP-10 and RANTES (Figure 4A-4B), known to be responsible for the attraction of monocytes and T lymphocytes [69, 70]. Indeed, medium from the treated cells successfully supported chemo-attraction of PBMCs (Figure 4E). dsRB-SCP successfully activated direct and immune-cell-mediated bystander effects, amplifying the killing of PSMA-overexpressing cells and extending the effect to neighboring PSMA-negative cancer cells (Figure 5). These in vitro findings suggest that the treatment should be effective against heterogeneous tumors, in vivo.
To better predict the clinical efficacy of dsRB-SCP/polyIC we used a tumor spheroid model. Cancer cells cultured as monolayers often show misleading sensitivity to therapeutic agents. Tumors feature cell-cell adhesion and three-dimensional shape, leading to “multi-cellular resistance” (MCR), which cannot be replicated in two-dimensional cultures [71]. Tumor cells cultured as spheroids present a multi-layer cell system that has many features of the three-dimensional tumor and therefore has greater potential to predict clinical efficacy [43, 72, 73]. Treatment of tumor spheroids with dsRB-SCP/polyIC resulted in visible structural damage (loss of integrity), probably due to the loss of adhesion between dead cells (Figure 6A). Adding immune cells to the spheroid model greatly amplified the response and accelerated the tumor disintegration time (Figure 6B). In both monolayer and spheroid cultures, the bystander effects were activated at extremely low doses of polyIC, suggesting that extensive tumor killing can be obtained in vivo, without toxic side effects.
In conclusion, we present a potent targeted therapy for metastatic prostate cancer, which leverages the antitumor effect of polyIC and delivers it specifically to cancer cells, using a novel chimeric recombinant protein vector. Our treatment demonstrates high effectiveness. It eradicates targeted and neighboring untargeted cancer cells in monolayer cultures, and rapidly and efficiently destroys tumor spheroids. It does so by activating apoptotic cancer cell death, as well as powerful direct and immune-cell-mediated bystander effects. Our treatment has two major advantages in the clinical setting. First, it can be used with low doses of polyIC, especially in patients who are not immune compromised, thus minimizing polyIC toxicity [74]. Second, tumors are heterogeneous, with only some cells overexpressing PSMA. dsRB-SCP overcomes this challenge and holds promise of substantial efficacy, because of its ability to harness the immune system against the whole tumor and not only against the targeted sub-populations.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Cloning of GFP-SCP and dsRB-SCP
Plasmids pGFP-SCP (encoding GFP linked via Arg9 to the single chain antibody ScFvJ591 against PSMA; 56 kDa; Figure 1A) and pdsRB-SCP (encoding dsRB of human PKR linked via Arg9 to ScFvJ591; 48 kDa; Figure 2A) were constructed as follows: SCP (single chain antibody against PSMA, ScFvJ591) was amplified by PCR from plasmid SFG-Pz1 [29], using primers SCP-N and SCP-C. GFP was amplified by PCR from plasmid pEGFP-N3 (Clontech), using primers GFP-N and GFP-C. dsRB was amplified by PCR from plasmid DRBM-DT-EGF [56] using primers dsRB-N and dsRB-C. To prepare the Arg9 linker (GSRRRRRRRRGRKA), oligonucleotide 9ARG1 was annealed to its complementary oligonucleotide 9ARG2. The oligonucleotides used are listed in Table 1. GFP-SCP was constructed in several stages in the bacterial expression vector pET28a (Novagen): GFP was cloned after the His6 tag of plasmid pET28a, between the NdeI and BamHI restriction sites, SCP was cloned between the HindIII and XhoI sites, and the Arg9 linker was inserted between the BamH1 and HindIII sites, to give the fusion His6-GFP-Arg9-SCP (Figure 1A and Supplementary Data). For the construction of dsRB-SCP, the GFP fragment was replaced with the dsRB sequence using restriction sites NdeI and BamHI, to give the fusion His6-dsRB-Arg9-SCP (Figure 2A and Supplementary Data). The constructs were sequenced at The Center for Genomic Technologies at The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Table 1. Oligonucleotides used for the construction of pGFP-SCP and dsRB-SCP.
Name | Sequence 5′ to 3′ |
---|---|
SCP-N | TTTACTCGAGCGGAGGTGCAGCTGCAGC |
SCP-C | TTTTGCTCAGCGCCGTTACAGGTCC AGCCATG |
GFP-N | TTTTCATATGGTGAGCAAGGGCG |
GFP-C | TAAGGATCCGCCACCGCCGCTTTT CTTGTACAGC |
dsRB-N | TTTCATATGATGGCTGGTGATC |
dsRB-C | TTAGGATCCGCCACCGCCGCTCTCCGATAAGATC TGCAG |
9ARG1 | GATCCCGTCGTCGCCGTCGTCGCCGTCGCGGCCGCAA |
9ARG2 | AGCTTTGCGGCCGCGACGGCGACGACGGCGACGACGG |
Expression of GFP-SCP and dsRB-SCP
The chimeric proteins were expressed in E. coli BL21trxB(DE3) (Novagen, Madison, WI, USA) which had been transformed with plasmid pRARE, which encodes tRNAs for rare codons. The bacteria were grown at 37°C, in 2XYT medium, supplemented with 25 μg/ml chloramphenicol, 30 μg/ml kanamycin, 100 μg/ml ampicillin, 1% glucose and 5% NPS buffer (1M KH2PO4, 1M Na2HPO4, 0.5M (NH4)2SO4). When the culture reached OD600 ∼ 0.3, 0.1% glycerol and 0.1mM L-glutamic acid were added, and the culture was moved to 42 °C, to induce the expression of E. coli chaperones and enhance protein solubility. When the culture reached O.D600∼0.9, it was cooled down on ice and transferred to 14 °C. After a 10 minute adjustment period, IPTG was added to 0.5 mmol/L, followed by incubation for 24 h at 14 °C. The bacteria were harvested and the pellet stored at -80°C until purification.
Purification of GFP-SCP and dsRB-SCP
GFP-SCP: The pellet obtained from 1.2 L of E.coli BL21trxB(DE3, pRARE, pGFP-SCP) was thawed on ice in 60ml binding buffer (Buffer A, 30mM HEPES pH 8.3, 0.5M NaCl, 10% glycerol, 10mM imidazole) supplemented with a protease inhibitor cocktail, 3mg/ml lysozyme and DNase, and lysed using a LV1 microfluidizer (Microfluidics, Newton, MA, USA). The extract was clarified by centrifugation for 30 minutes (15,000×g, 4°C), loaded onto an 8 ml nickel sepharose FF IMAC column (GE Healthcare, Basel, Switzerland), and washed with 10 column volumes (CV) of binding buffer, followed by 6 CV of 5% Buffer B (30mM HEPES pH 8.3, 0.5M NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1M imidazole), 6 CV of 10% Buffer B and 1 CV of 15% Buffer B. The protein was eluted with 60% Buffer B. Fractions containing the chimera (8 ml total) were loaded onto a 500 ml Sephacryl S-200 gel filtration column (GE Healthcare) pre-equilibrated with GF buffer (30 mM HEPES pH 8.3, 0.5 M NaCl, 10% glycerol). The fractions eluted after 0.5 CV were pooled, concentrated using Vivaspin-20 (MWCO: 30000, GE Healthcare) and loaded onto 350 ml Superdex-75. The fractions eluted after 0.5 CV were subjected to SDS–PAGE and stained with InstantBlue (Expedeon, Harston, UK). The fractions that contained highly purified chimera were pooled, concentrated using Vivaspin-20, and stored in aliquots at -80°C.
dsRB-SCP: The pellet obtained from 6 L of E.coli BL21trxB(DE3, pRARE, pdsRB-SCP) was thawed in 300 ml binding buffer A supplemented with protease inhibitors, lysozyme and DNase, lysed and clarified as above. To release bound host nucleic acids, the cleared lysate was mixed 1:1 (vol:vol) with 8 M urea. The mixture was incubated at 4 °C for 1.5 hours and then loaded onto 60 ml nickel sepharose FF column pre-equilibrated with buffer C (Buffer A supplemented with 0.5% Tween 80 and 4M urea), and washed with 12.4 CV Buffer C. To refold the protein, a linear gradient of Buffer C to Buffer D (Buffer A supplemented with 0.5% Tween 80), 10 CV, 0.8 ml/min flow was applied. The column was washed with 3 CV of 10% and 3 CV of 25% Buffer E (30 mM HEPES pH 8.3, 0.5 M NaCl, 10% glycerol, 500 mM imidazole, 0.5% Tween 80), and the protein was eluted with 100% buffer E. The fractions containing the chimera were pooled and diluted 1:1 with dilution buffer (30 mM MES pH, 10% Glycerol, 0.5% Tween). The diluted protein was clarified by centrifugation for 30 minutes (15,000×g, 4°C) and loaded onto a 66 ml Fracto-gel EMD SO3 IEX column (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). A manual step gradient (7 CV) of Buffer F (30 mM MES pH, 100 mM NaCl, 10% Glycerol, 0.001% Tween) and 25%, 27%, 30%, 37% and 38% Buffer G (30 mM HEPES pH 8.3, 2 M NaCl, 10% glycerol, 0.001% Tween 80) was applied. Samples of the eluted fractions were subjected to SDS–PAGE and stained with InstantBlue. Fractions that contained purified chimera were pooled, concentrated, and stored at -80°C as above. Judging from the InstantBlue stain (Figure 2B), the chimera was >95% pure. The yield was 3.8 mg protein from 6 L culture.
Cell lines LNCaP cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10 mM HEPES pH 7.4 and 1 mM sodium pyruvate. VCaP cells were cultured in DMEM (Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium). PC3 and DU145 cells were cultured in MEM (Minimum Essential Medium) supplemented with 1% non-essential amino acids, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 10 mM Hepes pH 7.4 and 1% MEM vitamin mixture. MCF7 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium. All tissue culture media were supplemented with penicillin (100 U/ml), streptomycin (100 mg/l) and 10% FBS (fetal bovine serum). All cell lines were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD, USA), tested and shown to be mycoplasma-free. LNCaP-Luc/GFP and PC3-Luc/GFP were generated using lentiviral vectors encoding the fusion gene luciferase-GFP (Luc/GFP) as previously described [33]. PBMCs were isolated from fresh human peripheral blood by standard Ficoll density-gradient centrifugation [14]. All cells were incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator. All cell culture reagents were purchased from Biological Industries, Bet Ha’emek, Israel.
Flow cytometry
Cells were plated onto 12-well plates at a density of 105 cells per well, grown for 40 hours and incubated with GFP-SCP at 37°C. After incubation, the cells were trypsinized, washed in PBS, re-suspended in 1 ml cold PBS and subjected to flow cytometry analysis using BD FACS ARIAIII (BD Biosciences, USA) equipped with a 488 nm laser. 10,000 cells were acquired for each treatment. The cells were gated to include only live cells and the subpopulation was analyzed for GFP levels. All data were analyzed using FlowJo software (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).
Immunocytochemistry
LNCaP, PC3 and MCF7 cells were grown for 48 hours and incubated with 25nM GFP-SCP for 5 hours at 37°C. After incubation cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, washed twice with PBS, permeabilized and stained with goat anti-GFP antibody (1:1000, ab5450, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA ), followed by incubation with DyLight 488-conjugated anti-goat secondary antibody (1:300, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA, USA). 4, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) was used to stain DNA. Stained samples were observed with a confocal microscope, FLUOVIEW FV-1000 (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
Live cell imaging
GFP-SCP localization was observed in live LNCaP cells, using time-lapse confocal microscopy (FLUOVIEW FV-1000). LNCaP cells were grown for 48 hours in 8-well μ-slides (Ibidi, GmbH, Munich, Germany). After changing the medium, 200 nM GFP-SCP was added directly to the chamber, the cells were immediately observed and subsequent images were taken every 6 minutes, for 72 minutes. The cells were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2, throughout the experiment. The images were analyzed using FLUOVIEW Viewer software (Ver.4.2).
dsRNA Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA)
500 bp long dsRNA transcribed from the control template of the MEGAscript RNAi Kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) was used to evaluate the binding of the purified protein to dsRNA. 1 μg of dsRNA was incubated for 30 minutes with increasing amounts of purified dsRB-SCP (0.5-3μg) in binding buffer (30 mM HEPES pH 8.3, 0.5 M NaCl, 10% glycerol) or in acidic buffer (0.5 M K-acetate pH5, 10% glycerol), and the mixture was electrophoresed on a 2% agarose gel. The gel was visualized by staining with ethidium bromide.
Preparation of dsRB-SCP/polyIC complex
Low molecular weight (LMW) polyIC (InvivoGen, Toulouse, France) was used for all of the experiments. To prepare dsRB-SCP/polyIC, dsRB was pre-incubated with polyIC at the concentrations indicated in the text in binding buffer (30 mM HEPES pH 8.3, 0.5 M NaCl, 10% glycerol), for 45 minutes at room temperature, before addition to the cells. For controls, PolyIC and dsRB-SCP were each pre-incubated alone for 45 minutes at room temperature in binding buffer.
Complexes of dsRB-SCP/polyIC, polyIC alone and dsRB-SCP alone, prepared as above, were dialyzed for 1.5 hours against 30mM HEPES pH8.3, 0.5M NaCl to remove the glycerol, using Slide-A-Lyzer MINI dialysis devices, 10K MWCO (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., MA, USA). For direct imaging using cryo-transmission electron microscopy (cryo-TEM), a drop (3μl) of sample was placed on a glow discharged TEM grid (300-mesh Cu grid) pre-coated with a holey carbon film (Lacey substrate, Ted Pella Ltd., Redding CA, USA). To obtain a vitrified thin film, excess sample was drained using filter paper and the grid was immediately plunged into liquid ethane pre-cooled by liquid nitrogen, using a Vitrobot Mark IV (FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA). Using a cold stage unit (Gatan model 626), the vitrified films were transferred to the electron microscope (FEI Tecnai 12 G2 TWIN, FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA) and examined at -177 °C. The images were recorded with a 4k x 4k FEI Eagle CCD camera in low dose mode and analyzed using Fiji image processing software.
Survival assay
LNCaP, VCaP, PC3 and MCF7 cells were seeded in 96-well plates in triplicate (5000 cells/well) and grown overnight. dsRB-SCP/polyIC, polyIC alone or dsRB-SCP was added to the cells, which were then incubated for another 100 hours. Survival was measured using the CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assay (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). To test whether the ∼20% of cells remaining after treatment were viable, LNCaP cells were seeded (5000 cells/well) in three 96-well plates pre-coated with poly-lysine. For each plate, treatments were repeated in triplicate wells and the cells were grown overnight. The cells were then treated with dsRB-SCP/polyIC, polyIC alone or dsRB-SCP alone. The first plate was assayed for survival after 100 hours. The medium in the second plate was changed after 100 hours and survival was assayed after 172 hours. The medium in the third plate was changed after 100 hours and again after 172 hours and survival was assayed after 344 hours.
Immunoblots
LNCaP cells were seeded in 6-well plates (106 cells/well), grown overnight and treated with dsRB-SCP/polyIC or polyIC alone at the indicated concentrations. After 7, 16 or 24 hours cells were lysed with boiling Laemmli sample buffer (10% glycerol, 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 3% SDS, and 5% 2-mercaptoethanol) and the lysates were then subjected to western blot analysis [75]. The cleavage of PARP and caspase-3 was monitored using anti-PARP (cat#95425), anti-caspase3 (cat#96625) and anti-cleaved caspase-3 (cat#96615) (all from Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA). As an internal control to normalize the amount of protein applied in each lane the blots were also incubated with anti-GAPDH (sc-25778, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz CA, USA).
Detection of secreted chemokines (IP-10 and RANTES) by ELISA
LNCaP cells were seeded in 96-well plates in triplicate and grown overnight (10,000 cells/well). Cells were then treated with dsRB-SCP/polyIC or polyIC alone at the indicated concentrations. After 48 hours the medium was collected and the concentrations of IP-10, RANTES and IFN-β were measured using commercial ELISA kits. IP-10 and RANTES were measured using PeproTech ELISA kits from PeproTech (Rocky Hill, NJ, USA) and IFN-β was measured using LumiKine hIFN-β kit (InvivoGen, Toulouse, France).
RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis and quantitative real-time PCR
LNCaP cells were seeded in 24-well plates (500,000 cells per well) and grown overnight. Cells were then treated for 4 hours with dsRB-SCP/polyIC, polyIC alone or dsRB-SCP alone at the indicated concentrations. The cells were lysed and total RNA was extracted using the EZ-10 DNA Away RNA-Miniprep Kit (Bio Basic, Toronto, Canada). Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized using the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). IFN-β gene expression levels were compared using quantitative real-time PCR and normalized to GAPDH expression using the ΔΔ CT method. The primers for IFN-β quantification were: forward: 5′ ATGACCAACAAGTGTCTCCTCC 3′ and reverse: 5′ GCTCATGGAAAGAGCTGTAGTG 3′. The primers for GAPDH quantification were forward: 5′ GAGCCACATCGCTCAGAC 3′ and reverse: 5′ CTTCTCATGGTTCACACCC 3′.
Chemotaxis of PBMCs LNCaP cells were seeded in 24-well plates pre-coated with poly-lysine (250,000 cells/well) and grown overnight. Then, the medium was replaced by low-serum medium (0.15% FBS) and the cells were treated with dsRB-SCP/polyIC at the indicated concentrations. After 48 hours conditioned medium was collected from the cells and placed in the bottom well of a 24-well Transwell system (microporous polycarbonate membrane (0.5 μm), CorningCostar Corp., Cambridge, MA, USA). Freshly isolated PBMCs (1×106) in low-serum medium (0.15% FBS) were added to the upper chamber. After 3.5 hours, medium from the lower chamber was collected and the migrated cells were quantified by FACS analysis, scatter-gating on lymphocytes.
Analysis of bystander effects in co-culture systems
In order to measure the viability of a single cell line in co-culture with other cells, we generated cells that expressed luciferase (either LNCaP-Luc/GFP or PC3-Luc/GFP).
The immune-cell-mediated bystander effect was analyzed using LNCaP-Luc/GFP cells co-cultured with PBMCs: LNCaP-Luc/GFP cells were seeded in triplicate in 96-well plates pre-coated with poly-lysine (10,000 cells/well) and grown overnight. The cells were then treated with dsRB-SCP/polyIC, polyIC alone or dsRB-SCP alone at the indicated concentrations. After 24 hours, freshly isolated PBMCs were added to the culture (1×105 per well). 48 hours later, the survival of LNCaP-Luc/GFP cells was measured based on luciferase activity using the Luciferase Assay System.
The combined direct and immune-cell-mediated bystander effect was analyzed using LNCaP cells co-cultured with PC3-Luc/GFP and PBMCs: LNCaP cells were seeded in triplicate in 96-well plates pre-coated with poly-lysine (6,000 cells/well) and grown overnight, and the cells were treated with dsRB-SCP/polyIC, polyIC alone or dsRB-SCP alone. After 16 hours PC3-Luc/GFP cells (4,000 cells/ well) were added to the culture. Eight hours later, i.e. 24 hours after treatment initiation, freshly isolated PBMCs (1×105/ well) were added to the culture. 48 hours later survival of the PC3-Luc/GFP cells was measured based on luciferase activity, using the Luciferase Assay system.
Tumor spheroid model
Tumor spheroids were generated using agar-coated plates. 96-well plates were coated with 50 μl/well agar (1.5% (wt/vol) dissolved in RPMI) as described by Friedrich, et al. [76]. LNCaP or LNCaP-Luc/GFP cells were seeded (2000 cells per well) and incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2. After 97 hours, a single spherical spheroid 300-400μm diameter had formed in each well.
To measure LNCaP spheroids following treatment with dsRB-SCP/polyIC, we transferred the spheroids individually to 96-well plates (1 spheroid/well) pre-coated with a very thin, even layer of polyHEMA (Sigma, St Louis, MI, USA) (120mg/ml dissolved in 95% ethanol). To transfer the spheroids, we first lifted each spheroid together with its 200 μl of medium into a 96U-well plate (with U-shaped wells). The plate was centrifuged for 10 minutes at 220g and the medium was replaced with 80 μl of fresh medium. The spheroid was then transferred, together with its 80 μl of medium, to the polyHEMA-coated plate. dsRB-SCP/polyIC, polyIC alone or dsRB-SCP alone were added at the indicated concentrations. Treatment continued for 5 days. On days 1, 2, 4 and 5, half of the medium in each well was removed and replaced with fresh medium containing the appropriate treatment. On Day 15, spheroids were stained with calcein AM (1:1000, c3099, Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) and 0.5μg/ml propidium iodide. Spheroids were monitored using confocal microscopy and size was measured using ImageJ software.
To analyze the immune-cell-mediated bystander effects on tumor spheroids, we treated LNCaP-Luc/GFP spheroids once, directly on the agar plate, with dsRB-SCP/polyIC, polyIC alone or dsRB-SCP alone at the indicated concentrations. After 24 hours fresh PBMCs were labeled using 1 μM CellTracker™ Violet BMQC (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. 8×104 PBMCs were added to the spheroid culture. The co-culture was monitored using confocal microscopy
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using unpaired t-test to compare the difference between two group's means. P value indicates the probability of a significant difference between two means, where P ≤ 0.05 was considered as a significant difference.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS FIGURES
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the technical assistance of Orit Berhani and Aviva Petcho, and thank Prof. Michel Sadelain for the gift of the plasmid encoding the single chain antibody.
Footnotes
GRANT SUPPORT
ISF grant no. 1556/13 (A. Levitzki), ERC Advanced Grant No. 249898 (A. Levitzki).
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
REFERENCES
- 1.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Attard G, Sarker D, Reid A, Molife R, Parker C, de Bono JS. Improving the outcome of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer through rational drug development. Br J Cancer. 2006;95:767–74. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Javidan J, Deitch AD, Shi XB, de Vere White RW. The androgen receptor and mechanisms for androgen independence in prostate cancer. Cancer Invest. 2005;23:520–28. doi: 10.1080/07357900500202721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Luo J, Beer TM, Graff JN. Treatment of Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Oncology (Williston Park) 2016;30:336–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kumaravel TS, Bristow RG. Detection of genetic instability at HER-2/neu and p53 loci in breast cancer cells sing Comet-FISH. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;91:89–93. doi: 10.1007/s10549-004-5780-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rajagopalan H, Jallepalli PV, Rago C, Velculescu VE, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Lengauer C. Inactivation of hCDC4 can cause chromosomal instability. Nature. 2004;428:77–81. doi: 10.1038/nature02313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Genetic instability in colorectal cancers. Nature. 1997;386:623–27. doi: 10.1038/386623a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gottesman MM, Fojo T, Bates SE. Multidrug resistance in cancer: role of ATP-dependent transporters. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:48–58. doi: 10.1038/nrc706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shattuck DL, Miller JK, Carraway KL, 3rd, Sweeney C. Met receptor contributes to trastuzumab resistance of Her2-overexpressing breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2008;68:1471–77. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zahreddine H, Borden KL. Mechanisms and insights into drug resistance in cancer. Front Pharmacol. 2013;4:28. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2013.00028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wyatt AW, Mo F, Wang K, McConeghy B, Brahmbhatt S, Jong L, Mitchell DM, Johnston RL, Haegert A, Li E, Liew J, Yeung J, Shrestha R, et al. Heterogeneity in the inter-tumor transcriptome of high risk prostate cancer. Genome Biol. 2014;15:426. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0426-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Andor N, Graham TA, Jansen M, Xia LC, Aktipis CA, Petritsch C, Ji HP, Maley CC. Pan-cancer analysis of the extent and consequences of intratumor heterogeneity. Nat Med. 2016;22:105–13. doi: 10.1038/nm.3984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hao JJ, Lin DC, Dinh HQ, Mayakonda A, Jiang YY, Chang C, Jiang Y, Lu CC, Shi ZZ, Xu X, Zhang Y, Cai Y, Wang JW, et al. Spatial intratumoral heterogeneity and temporal clonal evolution in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Nat Genet. 2016;48:1500–07. doi: 10.1038/ng.3683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Shir A, Ogris M, Roedl W, Wagner E, Levitzki A. EGFR-homing dsRNA activates cancer-targeted immune response and eliminates disseminated EGFR-overexpressing tumors in mice. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:1033–43. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bostwick DG, Pacelli A, Blute M, Roche P, Murphy GP. Prostate specific membrane antigen expression in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and adenocarcinoma: a study of 184 cases. Cancer. 1998;82:2256–61. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980601)82:11<2256::aid-cncr22>3.0.co;2-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Akhtar NH, Pail O, Saran A, Tyrell L, Tagawa ST. Prostate-specific membrane antigen-based therapeutics. Adv Urol. 2012;2012:973820. doi: 10.1155/2012/973820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sweat SD, Pacelli A, Murphy GP, Bostwick DG. Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression is greatest in prostate adenocarcinoma and lymph node metastases. Urology. 1998;52:637–40. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00278-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wright GL, Jr, Grob BM, Haley C, Grossman K, Newhall K, Petrylak D, Troyer J, Konchuba A, Schellhammer PF, Moriarty R. Upregulation of prostate-specific membrane antigen after androgen-deprivation therapy. Urology. 1996;48:326–34. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(96)00184-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mannweiler S, Amersdorfer P, Trajanoski S, Terrett JA, King D, Mehes G. Heterogeneity of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression in prostate carcinoma with distant metastasis. Pathol Oncol Res. 2009;15:167–72. doi: 10.1007/s12253-008-9104-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tagawa ST, Milowsky MI, Morris M, Vallabhajosula S, Christos P, Akhtar NH, Osborne J, Goldsmith SJ, Larson S, Taskar NP, Scher HI, Bander NH, Nanus DM. Phase II study of Lutetium-177-labeled anti-prostate-specific membrane antigen monoclonal antibody J591 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:5182–91. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Galsky MD, Eisenberger M, Moore-Cooper S, Kelly WK, Slovin SF, DeLaCruz A, Lee Y, Webb IJ, Scher HI. Phase I trial of the prostate-specific membrane antigen-directed immunoconjugate MLN2704 in patients with progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2147–54. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.0532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.van Leeuwen PJ, Stricker P, Hruby G, Kneebone A, Ting F, Thompson B, Nguyen Q, Ho B, Emmett L. (68) Ga-PSMA has a high detection rate of prostate cancer recurrence outside the prostatic fossa in patients being considered for salvage radiation treatment. BJU Int. 2016;117:732–39. doi: 10.1111/bju.13397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Phung YT, Barbone D, Broaddus VC, Ho M. Rapid generation of in vitro multicellular spheroids for the study of monoclonal antibody therapy. J Cancer. 2011;2:507–14. doi: 10.7150/jca.2.507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Liu H, Rajasekaran AK, Moy P, Xia Y, Kim S, Navarro V, Rahmati R, Bander NH. Constitutive and antibody-induced internalization of prostate-specific membrane antigen. Cancer Res. 1998;58:4055–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kularatne SA, Zhou Z, Yang J, Post CB, Low PS. Design, synthesis, and preclinical evaluation of prostate-specific membrane antigen targeted (99m)Tc-radioimaging agents. Mol Pharm. 2009;6:790–800. doi: 10.1021/mp9000712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Eder M, Schäfer M, Bauder-Wüst U, Hull WE, Wängler C, Mier W, Haberkorn U, Eisenhut M. 68 Ga-complex lipophilicity and the targeting property of a urea-based PSMA inhibitor for PET imaging. Bioconjug Chem. 2012;23:688–97. doi: 10.1021/bc200279b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pandit-Taskar N, O’Donoghue JA, Durack JC, Lyashchenko SK, Cheal SM, Beylergil V, Lefkowitz RA, Carrasquillo JA, Martinez DF, Fung AM, Solomon SB, Gönen M, Heller G, et al. A Phase I/II Study for Analytic Validation of 89Zr-J591 ImmunoPET as a Molecular Imaging Agent for Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:5277–85. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wolf P, Gierschner D, Bühler P, Wetterauer U, Elsässer-Beile U. A recombinant PSMA-specific single-chain immunotoxin has potent and selective toxicity against prostate cancer cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2006;55:1367–73. doi: 10.1007/s00262-006-0131-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gong MC, Latouche JB, Krause A, Heston WD, Bander NH, Sadelain M. Cancer patient T cells genetically targeted to prostate-specific membrane antigen specifically lyse prostate cancer cells and release cytokines in response to prostate-specific membrane antigen. Neoplasia. 1999;1:123–27. doi: 10.1038/sj.neo.7900018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bander NH, Milowsky MI, Nanus DM, Kostakoglu L, Vallabhajosula S, Goldsmith SJ. Phase I trial of 177lutetium-labeled J591, a monoclonal antibody to prostate-specific membrane antigen, in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:4591–601. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Vallabhajosula S, Nikolopoulou A, Jhanwar YS, Kaur G, Tagawa ST, Nanus DM, Bander NH, Goldsmith SJ. Radioimmunotherapy of Metastatic Prostate Cancer with 177Lu-DOTAhuJ591 Anti Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Specific Monoclonal Antibody. Curr Radiopharm. 2016;9:44–53. doi: 10.2174/1874471008666150313114005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Shir A, Ogris M, Wagner E, Levitzki A. EGF receptor-targeted synthetic double-stranded RNA eliminates glioblastoma, breast cancer, and adenocarcinoma tumors in mice. PLoS Med. 2006;3:e6. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zigler M, Shir A, Joubran S, Sagalov A, Klein S, Edinger N, Lau J, Yu SF, Mizraji G, Globerson Levin A, Sliwkowski MX, Levitzki A. HER2-Targeted Polyinosine/Polycytosine Therapy Inhibits Tumor Growth and Modulates the Tumor Immune Microenvironment. Cancer Immunol Res. 2016 doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-15-0203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Leader B, Baca QJ, Golan DE. Protein therapeutics: a summary and pharmacological classification. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008;7:21–39. doi: 10.1038/nrd2399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.He D, Yang H, Lin Q, Huang H. Arg9-peptide facilitates the internalization of an anti-CEA immunotoxin and potentiates its specific cytotoxicity to target cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2005;37:192–205. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2004.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wender PA, Mitchell DJ, Pattabiraman K, Pelkey ET, Steinman L, Rothbard JB. The design, synthesis, and evaluation of molecules that enable or enhance cellular uptake: peptoid molecular transporters. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:13003–08. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.24.13003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Santoro SP, Kim S, Motz GT, Alatzoglou D, Li C, Irving M, Powell DJ, Jr, Coukos G. T cells bearing a chimeric antigen receptor against prostate-specific membrane antigen mediate vascular disruption and result in tumor regression. Cancer Immunol Res. 2015;3:68–84. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-14-0192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Peisley A, Lin C, Wu B, Orme-Johnson M, Liu M, Walz T, Hur S. Cooperative assembly and dynamic disassembly of MDA5 filaments for viral dsRNA recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:21010–15. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1113651108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Der SD, Lau AS. Involvement of the double-stranded-RNA-dependent kinase PKR in interferon expression and interferon-mediated antiviral activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:8841–45. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.19.8841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kumar A, Zhang J, Yu FS. Toll-like receptor 3 agonist poly(I: C)-induced antiviral response in human corneal epithelial cells. Immunology. 2006;117:11–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2005.02258.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Galli R, Starace D, Busà R, Angelini DF, Paone A, De Cesaris P, Filippini A, Sette C, Battistini L, Ziparo E, Riccioli A. TLR stimulation of prostate tumor cells induces chemokine-mediated recruitment of specific immune cell types. J Immunol. 2010;184:6658–69. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0902401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kim JB. Three-dimensional tissue culture models in cancer biology. Semin Cancer Biol. 2005;15:365–77. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2005.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Takagi A, Watanabe M, Ishii Y, Morita J, Hirokawa Y, Matsuzaki T, Shiraishi T. Three-dimensional cellular spheroid formation provides human prostate tumor cells with tissue-like features. Anticancer Res. 2007;27:45–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Silver DA, Pellicer I, Fair WR, Heston WD, Cordon-Cardo C. Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression in normal and malignant human tissues. Clin Cancer Res. 1997;3:81–85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Krown SE, Kerr D, Stewart WE, 2nd, Field AK, Oettgen HF. Phase I trials of poly(I, C) complexes in advanced cancer. J Biol Response Mod. 1985;4:640–49. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Huang CJ, Lin H, Yang X. Industrial production of recombinant therapeutics in Escherichia coli and its recent advancements. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;39:383–99. doi: 10.1007/s10295-011-1082-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Carter PJ. Introduction to current and future protein therapeutics: a protein engineering perspective. Exp Cell Res. 2011;317:1261–69. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Liu H, Moy P, Kim S, Xia Y, Rajasekaran A, Navarro V, Knudsen B, Bander NH. Monoclonal antibodies to the extracellular domain of prostate-specific membrane antigen also react with tumor vascular endothelium. Cancer Res. 1997;57:3629–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Pandit-Taskar N, O’Donoghue JA, Durack JC, Lyashchenko SK, Cheal SM, Beylergil V, Lefkowitz RA, Carrasquillo JA, Martinez DF, Fung AM, Solomon SB, Gönen M, Heller G, et al. A Phase I/II Study for Analytic Validation of 89Zr-J591 ImmunoPET as a Molecular Imaging Agent for Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:5277–85. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Pandit-Taskar N, O’Donoghue JA, Divgi CR, Wills EA, Schwartz L, Gönen M, Smith-Jones P, Bander NH, Scher HI, Larson SM, Morris MJ. Indium 111-labeled J591 anti-PSMA antibody for vascular targeted imaging in progressive solid tumors. EJNMMI Res. 2015;5:28. doi: 10.1186/s13550-015-0104-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ahmad ZA, Yeap SK, Ali AM, Ho WY, Alitheen NB, Hamid M. scFv antibody: principles and clinical application. Clin Dev Immunol. 2012;2012:980250. doi: 10.1155/2012/980250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Tian B, Mathews MB. Functional characterization of and cooperation between the double-stranded RNA-binding motifs of the protein kinase PKR. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:9936–44. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M007328200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gunnery S, Mathews MB. RNA binding and modulation of PKR activity. Methods. 1998;15:189–98. doi: 10.1006/meth.1998.0623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Patel S, Blose JM, Sokoloski JE, Pollack L, Bevilacqua PC. Specificity of the double-stranded RNA-binding domain from the RNA-activated protein kinase PKR for double-stranded RNA: insights from thermodynamics and small-angle X-ray scattering. Biochemistry. 2012;51:9312–22. doi: 10.1021/bi300935p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Eguchi A, Meade BR, Chang YC, Fredrickson CT, Willert K, Puri N, Dowdy SF. Efficient siRNA delivery into primary cells by a peptide transduction domain-dsRNA binding domain fusion protein. Nat Biotechnol. 2009;27:567–71. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Edinger N, Lebendiker M, Klein S, Zigler M, Langut Y, Levitzki A. Targeting polyIC to EGFR over-expressing cells using a dsRNA binding protein domain tethered to EGF. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0162321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Fenner BJ, Goh W, Kwang J. Sequestration and protection of double-stranded RNA by the betanodavirus b2 protein. J Virol. 2006;80:6822–33. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00079-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Zheng X, Bevilacqua PC. Straightening of bulged RNA by the double-stranded RNA-binding domain from the protein kinase PKR. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:14162–67. doi: 10.1073/pnas.011355798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Salem ML, El-Naggar SA, Kadima A, Gillanders WE, Cole DJ. The adjuvant effects of the toll-like receptor 3 ligand polyinosinic-cytidylic acid poly (I: C) on antigen-specific CD8+ T cell responses are partially dependent on NK cells with the induction of a beneficial cytokine milieu. Vaccine. 2006;24:5119–32. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Levitzki A. Targeting the Immune System to Fight Cancer Using Chemical Receptor Homing Vectors Carrying Polyinosine/Cytosine (PolyIC) Front Oncol. 2012;2:4. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2012.00004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Futaki S, Suzuki T, Ohashi W, Yagami T, Tanaka S, Ueda K, Sugiura Y. Arginine-rich peptides. An abundant source of membrane-permeable peptides having potential as carriers for intracellular protein delivery. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:5836–40. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M007540200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Hosaka M, Nagahama M, Kim WS, Watanabe T, Hatsuzawa K, Ikemizu J, Murakami K, Nakayama K. Arg-X-Lys/Arg-Arg motif as a signal for precursor cleavage catalyzed by furin within the constitutive secretory pathway. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:12127–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Wang T, Zhao J, Ren JL, Zhang L, Wen WH, Zhang R, Qin WW, Jia LT, Yao LB, Zhang YQ, Chen SY, Yang AG. Recombinant immunoproapoptotic proteins with furin site can translocate and kill HER2-positive cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2007;67:11830–39. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Rejman J, Oberle V, Zuhorn IS, Hoekstra D. Size-dependent internalization of particles via the pathways of clathrin- and caveolae-mediated endocytosis. Biochem J. 2004;377:159–69. doi: 10.1042/BJ20031253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Koukiekolo R, Sagan SM, Pezacki JP. Effects of pH and salt concentration on the siRNA binding activity of the RNA silencing suppressor protein p19. FEBS Lett. 2007;581:3051–56. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.05.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Paone A, Starace D, Galli R, Padula F, De Cesaris P, Filippini A, Ziparo E, Riccioli A. Toll-like receptor 3 triggers apoptosis of human prostate cancer cells through a PKC-alpha-dependent mechanism. Carcinogenesis. 2008;29:1334–42. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgn149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Imai K, Takaoka A. Comparing antibody and small-molecule therapies for cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:714–27. doi: 10.1038/nrc1913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Cree IA, Charlton P. Molecular chess? Hallmarks of anti-cancer drug resistance. BMC Cancer. 2017;17:10. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2999-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Schall TJ, Bacon K, Toy KJ, Goeddel DV. Selective attraction of monocytes and T lymphocytes of the memory phenotype by cytokine RANTES. Nature. 1990;347:669–71. doi: 10.1038/347669a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Huang H, Xiang J. Synergistic effect of lymphotactin and interferon gamma-inducible protein-10 transgene expression in T-cell localization and adoptive T-cell therapy of tumors. Int J Cancer. 2004;109:817–25. doi: 10.1002/ijc.20043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Minchinton AI, Tannock IF. Drug penetration in solid tumours. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:583–92. doi: 10.1038/nrc1893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Hirschhaeuser F, Menne H, Dittfeld C, West J, Mueller-Klieser W, Kunz-Schughart LA. Multicellular tumor spheroids: an underestimated tool is catching up again. J Biotechnol. 2010;148:3–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Chambers KF, Mosaad EM, Russell PJ, Clements JA. Doran MR 3rd. 3D Cultures of prostate cancer cells cultured in a novel high-throughput culture platform are more resistant to chemotherapeutics compared to cells cultured in monolayer. PLoS One. 2014;9:e111029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Cheng YS, Xu F. Anticancer function of polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid. Cancer Biol Ther. 2010;10:1219–23. doi: 10.4161/cbt.10.12.13450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Mizrachy-Schwartz S, Cohen N, Klein S, Kravchenko-Balasha N, Levitzki A. Up-regulation of AMP-activated protein kinase in cancer cell lines is mediated through c-Src activation. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:15268–77. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.211813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Friedrich J, Seidel C, Ebner R, Kunz-Schughart LA. Spheroid-based drug screen: considerations and practical approach. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:309–24. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.