Abstract
TMPRSS2:ERG (T/E) gene fusions are present in approximately 50% of all prostate cancer (PCa) cases. The expression of fusion mRNAs from distinct T/E variants is associated with clinicopathological parameters, while the underlying molecular processes remain unclear. We characterized the molecular mechanisms and functional implications caused by doxycycline (Dox)-inducible overexpression of the frequent T/E III and VI fusion variants in LNCaP cells. Induction of T/E expression resulted in increased cellular migratory and invasive potential, and reduced proliferation and accumulation in G1 phase. T/E overexpressing cells showed epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), as demonstrated by upregulation of TGF-β and WNT pathway genes, mesenchymal markers, and increased phosphorylation of the p38 MAPK. Augmented secretion of TGF-β1 and –β2, and T/E-mediated regulation of ALK1, a member of the TGF-β receptor family, was detected. ALK1 inhibition in T/E overexpressing cells blocked p38 phosphorylation and reduced the expression of the TGF-β target genes VIM, MMP1, CDH2, and SNAI2. We found a T/E variant VI-specific induction of miR-503 associated with reduced expression of SMAD7 and CDH1. Overexpression of miR-503 led to increased levels of VIM and MMP1. Our findings indicate that TGF-β signaling is a major determinant of EMT in T/E overexpressing LNCaP cells. We provide evidence that T/E VI-specific transcriptional modulation by miR-503 accounts for differences in the activation of EMT pathway genes, promoting the aggressive phenotype of tumors expressing T/E variant VI. We suggest that ALK1-mediated TGF-β signaling is a novel oncogenic mechanism in T/E positive PCa.
Keywords: TMPRSS2:ERG fusion variants, TGF-β signaling, ALK1, EMT, prostate cancer
INTRODUCTION
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most frequently diagnosed cancer among men in Western countries and a major cause of cancer-related mortality [1, 2]. PCa is a heterogeneous disease with several molecular and clinicopathological subtypes. The TMPRSS2:ERG (T/E) gene fusion, resulting from a chromosomal rearrangement of ERG (v-ets erythroblastosis virus E26 homolog (avian)) to the androgen responsive gene TMPRSS2 (transmembrane protease, serine 2), is the most frequent somatic alteration in PCa [3], and detectable in 50% of the tumors [4]. In those cases, ERG overexpression is driven by the androgen-responsive promoter of TMPRSS2, resulting in upregulation of ERG protein and activation of downstream target genes [5]. Ninety percent of PCas overexpressing ERG harbor T/E fusions [5]. However, no consensus on the prognostic significance of T/E fusion-positive tumors has been reached so far [6, 7]. This may be due to differences in tumor characteristics and multiple T/E isoforms [6, 8, 9], which have been associated with clinicopathological parameters [10] and progression [11, 12]. The most common fusion mRNA variant III (T/E III), containing exon 1 of TMPRSS2 (1-17bp) and exons 4-11 of ERG (T1/E4), is present in 86% of fusion-positive tumors [10]. Since exon 1 of TMPRSS2 is noncoding, this mRNA is translated from an internal ATG site, resulting in a truncated ERG protein. The expression of T/E VI, resulting from fusion of exons 1-2 of TMPRSS2 to exons 4-11 of ERG (T2/E4), has been associated with aggressive disease [10]. This mRNA is translated from a start codon within TMPRSS2 exon 2 that is in frame with the ERG ORF. The resulting protein includes the first five amino acids of TMPRSS2 and lacks the first 12 amino acids of the full-length ERG protein.
Previously, we found T/E specific transcriptional upregulation of genes associated with activated TGF-β/BMP and WNT signaling in fusion-positive PCa compared to fusion-negative PCa [13]. TGF-β and WNT signaling regulate a diverse range of cellular processes related to cancer progression [14, 15] and are major inducers of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) [16]. Here, our aim was to characterize the molecular mechanisms and functional implications of T/E variant overexpression and their consequences on cellular and molecular phenotypes. We focused on the analysis of T/E III and T/E VI gene fusion variants based on their frequencies of occurrence and their association with clinical and pathological variables. We established LNCaP cells, featuring androgen-independency with high levels of androgen receptor (AR), stably overexpressing the T/E III and VI variants in an inducible promoter system (LNCaP-T/E) and examined the effects of overexpression on cellular properties and signal transduction pathways. To validate the observed transcriptional modulation upon ERG overexpression in LNCaP, the T/E-positive prostate cancer cell line NCI-H660 [17] was employed. This cell line harbors both T/E III and T/E VI fusions [17]. Complementary to the LNCaP-T/E model, ERG was silenced in NCI-H660 using an ERG-specific siRNA and mRNA levels of the targets previously measured in LNCaP-T/E clones were assessed. Overall, we found a large degree of commonality but also distinct transcriptional effects between T/E III and VI variants.
RESULTS
Characterization of T/E expressing LNCaP cells
To study the role of the T/E gene fusion variants (Figure 1A), we made use of a Flp recombinase based transfection system allowing stable and inducible expression of T/E variants III and VI in LNCaP cells. An empty expression vector served as a control. The expression of T/E variants was verified using RT-PCR (Supplementary Figure 1B). QPCR analysis after Dox-induction showed ∼50-fold and ∼150-fold upregulation of ERG in T/E III and T/E VI cells, respectively (Figure 1B). Western blot analysis confirmed the expression of ERG protein in Dox-induced LNCaP-T/E cells only (Figure 1C). In line with previous reports that ERG expression leads to downregulation of AR transcripts [18], both LNCaP-T/E III and VI cell lines showed markedly decreased AR protein after ERG overexpression (Figure 1C), indicating that the cell lines faithfully reflect the in vivo situation. Concurrent with reports that lower AR expression is associated with reduced differentiation of PCa cells [19], we noticed morphological changes, including cellular rounding, spindle-like branching, and detachment from adjacent cells (Figure 1D), which resembled a fibroblast-like morphology. These results suggested that ERG affects processes controlling the morphology of LNCaP cells.
T/E overexpression confers oncogenic properties to LNCaP cells
The impact of T/E overexpression on LNCaP cells was analyzed using proliferation, migration and invasion assays. T/E overexpressing cells showed reduced proliferation from 48 h to 96 h post induction (Figure 1E). After 72 h, a decreased number of cells in S- and G2-phase while an increased number in G1-phase was observed (Figure 1F) for both T/E III and VI variants. No apoptotic cells were detectable in the sub-G1 fractions. Thus, T/E overexpression induced cell cycle changes leading to the accumulation of cells in G1 phase and reduced cell proliferation without apoptosis. T/E expressing LNCaP cells migrated and invaded significantly faster compared to uninduced or empty vector controls (Figure 1G and 1H) and the migration rate was higher in T/E VI compared to T/E III cells (Figure 1G).
Overexpression of T/E III and VI variants reveal transcriptional programs associated with TGF-β signaling
The transcriptional programs regulated by T/E overexpression were investigated by microarray expression profiling on 48,107 genes (GEO accession GSE78032). Differentially expressed genes (> 1.5 fold change cut-off; p < 0.05) compared to empty vector control (n = 4,429; Supplementary Table 1) were selected for further analysis using the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) program. Of the 2,205 genes, which were altered in both T/E III and VI variants (T/E intersection; Supplementary Table 1), 94% showed concordant expression changes, indicating a high degree of accordance between the variants. The number of distinct genes found after T/E III or VI overexpression (T/E III only and T/E VI only) was 418 and 1,806, respectively (Supplementary Table 1).
Comparison of differential mRNA expression between LNCaP-T/E cells and T/E-positive ex vivo tumors [13] revealed 30% (37/126) overlap, including the genes Tudor Domain Containing 1 (TDRD1), Cluster of Differentiation 24 (CD24), BMP And Activin Membrane-Bound Inhibitor (BAMBI), and Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 1 (CDK1) [13]. Furthermore, transcriptional changes in T/E overexpressing cells were consistent with the expected transcriptional response to ERG overexpression based on previous findings. For example, AR and the androgen-responsive genes TMPRSS2 [5, 18], SLC45A3 [5, 18, 19], ACPP [19], and MSMB [5, 19] were downregulated, whereas genes known to be activated by ERG, e.g. PLAT [18], PLA1A [5], and MMP1 [20] were upregulated. These data indicated that our T/E expressing cell models faithfully reflected the transcriptional regulation in T/E-positive tumors and are suio study the biology of the variants.
GO analysis in IPA using the T/E intersection (n = 2,205) showed that genes associated with cell proliferation and interphase were downregulated (Supplementary Table 2), which was in agreement with the reduced proliferative ability of LNCaP-T/E cells (Figure 1E). ‘Estrogen-mediated S-phase Entry’ was identified among the top significantly enriched canonical pathways (Supplementary Table 3). This corresponded to the accumulation of the T/E overexpressing cells in G1 phase (Figure 1F). Consistent with the increased number of migrated and invaded cells found in the transwell assays (Figure 1G and 1H), genes belonging to the category ‘Cell invasion’ were primarily upregulated (Supplementary Table 2).
To study potential mechanisms regulating transcriptional changes associated with increased migration and invasion in LNCaP-T/E cells, an upstream regulator analysis was performed with the T/E intersection dataset (Supplementary Table 1). This analysis revealed transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFB1) as an upstream regulator of 284 genes that were directly associated with TGFB1 regulation (Supplementary Table 4), and indicated that TGF-β signaling plays a crucial role in T/E overexpressing cells as previously suggested by us [13]. Evidence for activated TGF-β signaling in the differentially expressed gene set (n = 4,429) was provided by upregulation of several TGF-β pathway-specific genes, e.g. bone morphogenetic protein 1 (BMP1), or downregulation of negative regulators of TGF-β signaling, such as the pseudoreceptor BAMBI (Figure 2A). Activation of noncanonical TGF-β signaling was evident by upregulation of SMAD-independent molecules involved in the ERK, JNK/p38 and PI3K/AKT pathways (Figure 2A). We also found upregulation of EMT-inducing transcription factors (SNAI2, ZEB1), mesenchymal markers (FN1, VIM, VTN) and matrix metalloproteinases (MMP1, MMP10), and downregulation of E-cadherin (CDH1) (Figure 2A), again supporting our finding that T/E expressing cells lose epithelial characteristics and acquire a mesenchymal phenotype. Of note, the upregulated genes included the type I TGF-β receptor Activin A Receptor Like Type 1 (ACVRL1, also known as ALK1) (Figure 2A), as well as the WNT receptor Frizzled 4 (FZD4) and its co-receptors LRP5 and LRP6 (Figure 2A), suggesting that these receptors might be mediators of transcriptional changes leading to EMT in T/E overexpressing cells.
Validation of the microarray data by qPCR verified the strong upregulation of ALK1 and FZD4 in both LNCaP-T/E variants (Figure 2B) as well as upregulation of EMT-inducing components and downregulation of genes negatively associated with TGF-β signaling (Figure 2B). Notably, the validation confirmed the strong upregulation of the selected EMT inducing ligands (TGFB1, 7.3-fold; TGFB2, 5.5-fold) and downstream effector genes (TCF7L2, 5.1-fold; SNAI2, 4.7-fold) in T/E VI cells, whereas CDH1 (4.3-fold) and SMAD7 (2.3-fold) were downregulated in T/E VI compared to T/E III expressing cells (Figure 2C).
Distinct intracellular signaling molecules are regulated in T/E variants
TGF-β signaling is mediated by SMAD-dependent and -independent signaling pathways involving JNK/p38 MAPK and PI3K/AKT [21, 22]. Multiplex protein quantification using Luminex technology and Western blot (Figure 3) for TGF-β signaling analysis revealed increased phosphorylation of p38 MAPK (Figure 3A and 3B), AKT (T/E III cells only; Figure 3C, 3D and 3E), JNK (Figure 3F), and SMAD1/5 (Figure 3G) upon T/E overexpression. Increased levels of p-SMAD1/5 and p-p38 were detectable 4h after T/E induction, concomitant with increasing ERG levels in T/E III and T/E VI cells. Increased phosphorylation of SMAD2 and 3 was not observed (data not shown). The increased AKT phosphorylation in T/E III, but not in T/E VI, expressing cells (Figure 3C, 3D and 3E) went along with the increasing ERG expression as confirmed by quantitative analysis showing the pAKT/AKT ratio in induced and uninduced cells, albeit this was not significant (Figure 3E). High basal levels of pAKT were observed in T/E III cells (Figure 3D). Activation of survival-associated processes corresponded to the functional annotation of the T/E gene set (Supplementary Table 2). TGF-β-mediated AKT activation has previously been proposed to overcome the growth-inhibitory effects of TGF-β in BPH1 tumorigenic sublines [23]. Taken together, these findings provided evidence for increased TGF-β signaling in both T/E variants, as well as an activated AKT dependent survival network upon T/E III overexpression, that might act together to induce EMT in this PCa cell model.
Soluble TGF-β is produced by T/E overexpressing cells
Increased TGFB1 and -2 levels in T/E overexpressing cells motivated us to test whether TGF-β is secreted to act in an autocrine manner. Active TGF-β was measured in cell-free conditioned medium using Luminex immunoassays 72 h after Dox induction. T/E III and VI overexpressing cells displayed considerably increased TGF-β1 (7-fold and 2-fold, respectively) and TGF-β2 (6-fold and 3-fold, respectively) protein compared to controls (Figure 4A). Thus, T/E overexpression induced secretion of TGF-β1 and TGF-β2. SiRNA-mediated ERG knockdown in the NCI-H660 PCa cell line carrying both T/E fusion variants III and VI [17] reduced TGFB1 mRNA levels (Figure 5A), further supporting the T/E-mediated upregulation of TGF-β ligands. Moreover, siRNA-mediated TGFB1 knockdown in T/E III and VI cells led to upregulation of the negative TGF-β regulators BAMBI (in T/E III and VI cells) and SMAD7 (only in T/E VI cells, Figure 4B and 4C), indicating that TGFB1 plays a role in T/E-induced TGF-β signaling.
ALK1 signaling regulates p38 MAPK and EMT markers
Since ALK1 mRNA was strongly upregulated in T/E overexpressing cells (40-fold in T/E III and 500-fold in T/E VI cells; Figure 2B), we analyzed this pathway in more detail. ERG knockdown in NCI-H660 cells led to reduced ALK1 mRNA levels (Figure 5A) confirming the association between ERG and ALK1 expression. Next, Dox-induced LNCaP-T/E cells were incubated with a human recombinant decoy receptor (rhALK1) [24] or the ALK1 inhibitor K02288 [25]. Disruption of ALK1 signaling using rhALK1 (Figure 5B and 5C) or K02288 (Figure 5F and 5G) resulted in reduced p38 phosphorylation. As expected [26, 27], the inhibitor of differentiation 1 (ID1), and ID2 genes were upregulated after ERG induction, but reduced after rhALK1 (Figure 5D and 5E) or K02288 (Figure 5H and 5I) treatment. These data suggested that T/E overexpression induces ALK1-signaling and supported the concept that ALK1-mediated phosphorylation of p38 confers mesenchymal transformation of PCa cells. In line with this, rhALK1-mediated inhibition of ALK1 signaling led to reduced expression of MMP1 (52% reduction) in T/E III (Figure 5D), and MMP1, VIM, and SNAI2 (39%, 22%, and 5% reduction, respectively) in T/E VI cells (Figure 5E). ALK1 inhibition by K02288 also resulted in reduced expression of MMP1 and CDH2 (35% and 61% reduction, respectively) in T/E III (Figure 5H) and MMP1, CDH2, VIM, and SNAI2 (72%, 50%, 40%, and 48% reduction, respectively) in T/E VI overexpressing cells (Figure 5I).
T/E overexpression activates β-catenin signaling in prostate cancer cells
WNT/β-catenin and TGF-β signaling pathways share key molecules (p38 MAPK, SNAI1/2, ZEB1/2 [16]) and can synergistically induce changes associated with EMT. Since we had identified an EMT transcriptional signature and upregulation of the WNT/β-catenin target genes in T/E overexpressing cells (Figure 2A–2C), we characterized signaling downstream of WNT in more detail. Overexpression of both T/E variants led to increased β-catenin signaling (Figure 6A), which was 2.4-fold higher in T/E VI compared to T/E III overexpressing cells. To test whether induction of gene expression was mediated by FZD4 upregulation, we incubated cells with rhFZD4. Disruption of FZD4-signaling showed a clear reduction of p38 phosphorylation in T/E III and T/E VI cells by Western blot (Figure 6B), and band quantification (Figure 6C). Further, we observed reduced MMP1, VIM, and CDH2 levels in T/E III and VI (Figure 6D and 6E) and additionally reduced SNAI2 in T/E VI cells (Figure 6E). These data suggest that FZD4-induced oncogenic effects of T/E overexpression are mediated by p38.
Upregulation of miR-503 in T/E VI cells promotes EMT by targeting SMAD7
We further aimed to identify determinants of the stronger activation of EMT regulating pathways genes in T/E VI expressing cells. We focused on miR-503, which was strongly upregulated in the T/E VI only (∼7-fold), but not in the T/E III only microarray dataset (Supplementary Table 1). A search for potential miR-503 targets using in silico prediction algorithms showed that miR-503 could target SMAD7 [28], which was downregulated in T/E VI, but upregulated in T/E III cells. We therefore hypothesized that miR-503 might be a candidate modulating the biological activity of the T/E VI fusion variants. To test whether miR-503 could augment EMT, we transiently overexpressed and inhibited miR-503 in T/E III and T/E VI cells using miR-503 mimics and inhibitors, respectively. Only induced T/E VI cells displayed significant upregulation of miR-503, which was further increased by simultaneous miR-503 overexpression (Figure 7A). Key EMT markers like VIM and MMP1 were upregulated in T/E-induced cells and were further increased after miR-503 overexpression (Figure 7B). Inhibition of miR-503 upon induction of T/E VI expression led to a reduction of VIM (Figure 7B). The impacts of miR-503 overexpression and inhibition on SMAD7, and CDH1 quantities as surrogate for a mesenchymal phenotype were examined by Western blot analysis. MiR-503 overexpression led to decreased SMAD7 and CDH1 expression in T/E VI cells (Figure 7C and 7D). These results suggested that T/E VI-mediated overexpression of miR-503 plays an important role in increasing EMT effectors and that miR-503 can induce invasion of T/E VI expressing cells due to its ability to downregulate CDH1. Furthermore, TGFB1 knockdown in T/E VI cells showed reduced expression of miR-503 (Figure 7E), suggesting that the expression of miR-503 is regulated by TGF-β, thereby contributing to enhanced TGF-β signaling by inhibition of SMAD7 [29]. The varying SMAD7 levels are consistent with the observed differences in TGF-β and WNT/β-catenin signaling activity between T/E III and T/E VI cells.
DISCUSSION
Previously, we reported that transcriptional changes in T/E positive tumors are associated with deregulated TGF-β/BMP and WNT signaling pathways [13]. Here, by deploying inducible T/E overexpression in LNCaP cell models, we show that overexpression of two distinct T/E variants induce common as well as unique signaling programs that are able to lead the cells into EMT. Upon T/E overexpression, the cells acquire mesenchymal, fibroblast-like morphologies [30]. On the molecular level, this is accompanied by downregulation of AR, suggesting that ERG disrupts a lineage-specific differentiation program of prostate cells [18, 19], and upregulation of EMT effector genes, like MMP1 and VIM, which are correlated with poor PCa tissue differentiation [31] and metastasis formation [32]. Furthermore, upregulated EMT-associated genes included the transcription factors ZEB1 [30] and TCF/LEF-1 [33], as well as TGFB1 and -2 [34]. We also show that T/E overexpression significantly enhances the invasion capability of LNCaP cells. These results are in agreement with the role of T/E overexpression in promoting cell invasion via induction of matrix metalloproteinase and plasminogen activator genes [3, 5, 12]. Global gene expression analysis of T/E overexpressing cells led to significantly overrepresented GO categories (proliferation and invasion), which correlated with the observed cellular phenotype. We further found many components of known signaling pathways, including JNK/p38 MAPKs, AKT and SMAD1/5, to be deregulated (Figure 8). Importantly, TGFB1 was identified as a regulator gene of T/E-induced transcriptional changes, which again supports our previous ex vivo data [13]. Increased TGF-β expression has been shown to induce a tumor-promoting phenotype [35] facilitating metastatic dissemination [36]. TGF-β/BMP signaling is well known for its role in bone remodeling and metastasis formation in breast cancer [35] and could therefore play a role in promoting PCa metastases. Bone metastasis is a common site of PCa dissemination [37], and expression of TGF-β in PCa is correlated to metastasis and survival [38]. Intriguingly, serum TGF-β concentrations are elevated in PCa patients with bone metastases [39]. Furthermore, TGF-β protein and RNA expression was higher in bone metastases compared to visceral metastases in rapid autopsy specimens of patients who died of metastatic PCa [40] and was associated with a fibroblast-like phenotype [40]. We therefore propose that T/E-induced TGF-β secretion could have autocrine effects promoting tumor progression.
The T/E variants III and VI deploy two routes of ERG-mediated oncogenic pathway activation (Figure 8). The first route is characterized by strong upregulation of the TGF-β receptor ALK1, which can be activated by various BMPs, in addition to TGF-β1 and TGF-β3 [41, 42]. Inhibition of ALK1 in our model led to reduced phosphorylation of p38, downregulation of the EMT-markers VIM, MMP1, CDH2, and SNAI2, as well as reduced expression of ID1 and ID2, for which induction by ALK1 signaling is known [43]. ALK1-induced expression of ID1 promotes tumor cell metastasis [44]. ID1 was shown to be involved in mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET) of breast cancer cells during lung colonization after having undergone TGF-β-induced EMT [45]. High levels of ALK1 protein in tumor blood vessels can serve as a prognostic marker for metastatic disease in breast cancer patients [45]. In addition, the pharmacological inhibition of ALK1 was able to prevent metastatic dissemination and lung colonization in mouse models of endocrine pancreatic and mammary carcinomas [45, 46]. The high upregulation of ALK1 in T/E expressing cells in our study was accompanied by augmented levels of TGF-β1 and TGF-β2 mRNA and protein, suggesting that autocrine TGF-β signaling mediates ALK1 pathway activation and phenotypic cellular changes in T/E cells [47, 48].
The second route of T/E-induced signaling pointed towards FZD4 receptor-mediated WNT/β-catenin signaling as an important element [49, 50]. Evidence for the role of WNT signaling was seen in the upregulation of transcription factors of the T cell factor/lymphoid enhancer family (TCF7L2, LEF1), increased β-catenin reporter activity and downregulation of the negative regulator CDH1 [51]. These effects were more profound in T/E VI, compared to T/E III, expressing cells. Importantly, FZD4 was upregulated upon T/E overexpression, and inhibition of FZD4 led to reduced phosphorylation of p38. These results confirmed reports that loss of cell adhesion and EMT were associated with FZD4-induced activation of WNT signaling [49].
Our results further suggest that variant-specific transcriptional modulation is responsible for the differences in activation of EMT regulating pathway genes. Strikingly, we observed upregulation of miR-503 exclusively in T/E VI overexpressing cells. Overexpression of miR-503 was able to repress expression of SMAD7, a known negative regulator of TGF-β and WNT/β-catenin signaling [52]. Thus, the miR-503-mediated downregulation of SMAD7 in T/E VI, but not in T/E III cells, explains T/E VI variant-specific transcription. Recently, Li et al. could show that miR-503 downregulates SMAD7 expression and thereby enhances TGF-β signaling and the metastatic capability of breast cancer cells [28]. SMAD7-mediated stabilization of β-catenin binding to E-cadherin turned out to increase cell-cell adhesion and formation of adherens junctions [53], thereby potentially blocking metastasis. Reduced expression of SMAD7 might account for the stronger increase of TGF-β signaling and β-catenin reporter activity observed in T/E VI cells. Zhu et al. showed that stimulation of fibroblasts with recombinant TGF-β results in a decreased expression of SMAD7 [54]. In agreement with previous reports in MCF-10A breast cancer cells [55], TGFB1 knockdown also decreased miR-503 expression. MiR-503-mediated repression of SMAD7 therefore appears to be a way to escape the inhibitory effect of SMAD7 on TGF-β and WNT/β-catenin signaling. Although miR-503 expression was shown to be lower in metastatic compared to non-metastatic PCa xenografts [56], and several studies reported tumor suppressor properties of miR-503 [57, 58], in the context of T/E-induced TGF-β signaling miR-503 overexpression has tumor-promoting effects.
In conclusion, our study identifies the TGF-β/BMP and WNT/β-catenin signaling pathways as molecular determinants underlying T/E-mediated EMT in PCa cells (Figure 8). We confirm that WNT/β-catenin signaling in T/E cells is mediated by FZD4 and propose that miR-503 plays a crucial role in augmenting this process. We further demonstrate that TGF-β-ALK1-p38 signaling promotes EMT in T/E expressing cells. Our findings suggest that autocrine activation of ALK1 plays a role in PCa cells. This could provide a rational basis for ALK1-blocking agents (which are currently already tested in clinical studies in various malignancies [59, 60]) to inhibit progression of ERG-positive PCa.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell lines and culturing
LNCaP (CRL-1740) and NCI-H660 (CRL-5813) cells were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). Stably transfected acceptor LNCaP cells were maintained in RPMI1640 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), supplemented with 10% of Tet System Approved FBS (tet-FBS, Clontech, Göteborg, Sweden) and 80 μg/mL hygromycin B (Thermo Fisher Scientific). NCI-H660 cells were maintained in HITES medium supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum according to the provider's instructions. All cell lines were authenticated using Multiplex Cell Authentication by Multiplexion (Heidelberg, Germany) as described recently [61]. The SNP profiles matched known profiles or were unique. The purity of cell lines was validated using the Multiplex cell Contamination Test by Multiplexion (Heidelberg, Germany) as described recently [62]. No Mycoplasma, SMRV or interspecies contamination was detected.
Generation of LNCaP cell models stably expressing T/E variants
Establishment of the LNCaP-T/E variant cell model including T/E sequences is described in the Supplementary Methods (Supplementary Figure 1A and Supplementary Figure 2). Transgene expression was induced with 50 ng/mL Dox (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany) in RPMI1640 containing 10% tet-FBS. Medium of the uninduced cells was supplemented with the respective volume of PBS only.
RNA isolation, reverse transcription and quantitative real-time PCR
Total RNA was isolated from cell lines using the miRNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and quality controlled on the 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) with RNA 6000 Nano Kit according to manufacturer's protocols. Total RNA was reverse transcribed using the RevertAid H Minus First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). HotStarTaqDNA polymerase (Qiagen) was used for RT-PCR with 50 ng of cDNA template. Relative mRNA levels were assessed by quantitative RT-PCR on the Lightcycler 480 (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) using Universal Probe Library (UPL) assays and primers listed in Supplementary Table 5. Linear expression levels were normalized to GAPDH using the 2(−ΔΔCt) method [63]. For miRNA quantification, TaqMan® Assays (hsa-miR-503, ID: 1048; RNU6B, ID: 1093, Thermo Fisher Scientific) were used according to the manufacturer's instruction.
Microarray gene expression profiling
RNA was isolated with the RNase-Free DNase Set (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. After quality control, 500 ng of total RNA with a concentration of 50 ng/μl were submitted to the DKFZ Genomics and Proteomics Core Facility (GPCF) for Illumina Whole-Genome Expression Beadchip Analysis (Human HT-12 Chip). The raw data were quantile-normalized using the Bioconductor package preprocessCore in R. The microarray data reported in this study are available from the NCBI GEO database (GSE78032). Genes showing expression fold change > 1.5 (p-value < 0.05) were considered as differentially expressed and were analyzed with Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) (see below). Genes involved in relevant biological processes obtained from microarray analysis were validated by qPCR in the same samples that were used for microarray profiling.
Luciferase reporter assay
Cells seeded in triplicate in 96-well plates at 5000 cells/well were treated with Dox and transfected with 100 ng of either wild-type TOPflash or mutant FOPflash reporter plasmid from the TCF Reporter Plasmid Kit (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) using the JetPei Polyplus transfection reagent (VWR International, Darmstadt, Germany). Firefly luciferase signals were determined 72 h after transfection using the ONE-GloTM Luciferase Assay System (Promega, Mannheim, Germany). Fold activation of WNT/β-catenin pathway was calculated by dividing wild-type TOPflash by mutant FOPflash activity.
siRNA-mediated gene knock-down
LNCaP-T/E cells were transfected with 20nM siRNA against TGFB1 (Qiagen) using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and OptiMEM® I (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Cells transfected with nonsilencing AllStars Negative Control siRNA (Qiagen) were used as controls. Cells were treated for 48 h, medium was changed, Dox-supplemented medium was added where indicated and siRNA treatment was repeated. Cells were incubated for 72 h and processed for further analysis.
NCI-H660 cells were transfected with 50nM siRNA against ERG (Qiagen) using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and OptiMEM® I (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Cells transfected with nonsilencing AllStars Negative Control siRNA (Qiagen) were used as controls. Cells were incubated for 72 h and processed for further analysis.
miRNA transfection
For transfection, cells were treated with Dox and transfected with hsa-miR-503-5p inhibitor (Exiqon, Vedbaek, Denmark) or hsa-miR-503-5p mimic (GE Healthcare, Rosersberg, Sweden) using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX transfection reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Pharmacological inhibitors
The ALK1 inhibitor K02288 (Biomol, Hamburg, Germany) was dissolved at a concentration of 100 mM in DMSO. Further dilutions of K02288 were made in PBS to reduce the final concentration of DMSO in the assay. Equal amounts of DMSO added to the cell culture medium served as negative control. RhALK1 (R&D, Wiesbaden, Germany) was dissolved in PBS at a concentration of 100μg/mL, and rhFZD4 (R&D) was dissolved in PBS at a concentration of 400 μg/mL. Here, PBS was added to the cell culture medium as a negative control. Inhibitors or control solvents were diluted in Dox-containing tet-FBS medium and added to the cells for 48h.
Cell proliferation assay
Cells were treated with Dox for 48 h and seeded into 96-well plates at 5000 cells/well in 90 μl 10% tet-FBS-containing medium in triplicate. Ten μl of the colorimetric WST-1 reagent (Roche Diagnostics) was added to the medium and incubated at 37°C at the indicated time points. Absorbance was measured one hour after addition of WST-1 reagent using a Tecan Infinite® M200 microplate reader (Tecan Group Ltd., Männedorf, Switzerland).
Migration and invasion assays
In vitro cell migration assays were performed in duplicate using 24-well transwell chambers with 8 μm pore size (Merck Millipore). Cells (5 × 105 cells/ml) were seeded in the upper chamber in 200 μl serum-free medium. 700 μl of medium supplemented with 10% FBS as chemoattractant was filled into the bottom well. After 48 h of cultivation in 5% CO2 at 37°C, migrated cells attached to the lower surface of the insert were fixed with 100% methanol on ice and stained with 0.1% Crystal Violet (Sigma- Aldrich). Migrated cells were counted in four random fields under a light microscope (10× magnification).
Invasion assays were performed analogously after coating the transwell chambers with 100 μl Matrigel (BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany) per filter.
Cell cycle analysis
Twenty-four, 48 and 72 h after Dox induction, trypsinized cells were fixed with 100% ice-cold ethanol and stained with propidium iodide (PI) solution (PBS containing 50 μg/ml PI, 0.1mg/ml RNase A, 0.05% (v/v) Triton X-100). PI staining was analyzed using a FACSCanto II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). Data was analyzed using the software Cyflogig, version 1.2.1 (CyFlo Ltd., Turku, Finland).
Cell lysis and western blot analysis
Whole-cell lysates were prepared in RIPA lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 150mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS), supplemented with 1× cOmplete Mini Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche Diagnostics) and 1× PhosSTOP Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche Diagnostics). Lysates were boiled 5 min at 95°C with 4× reducing Roti-Load protein loading buffer (Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany). Samples were separated on a mini polyacrylamide gel (Bio-Rad, Munich, Germany) and transferred to PVDF membranes using the Trans-Blot Turbo semi-dry blotting system (Bio-Rad) at 1.3A, 25V for 7–10 min. After blocking with 5% BSA in Tween-20/PBS, membranes were probed with primary antibodies prepared in blocking solution overnight at 4°C on a roller, followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody in blocking solution for 1 h at room temperature and ECL detection (Thermo Fisher Scientific) by the ChemiDoc XRS+ system (Bio-Rad). Western blotting was performed using primary antibodies against ERG (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), and SMAD7 (Abcam), AR (Santa Cruz, Dallas, Texas, USA), p-SMAD1/5, SMAD1, p-p38, p38, p-AKT, AKT, CDH1, and GAPDH (all Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) at 1:1000 dilution. Secondary antibodies used were anti-rabbit-HRP (at 1:25000 dilution; Dianova, Hamburg, Germany) and anti-mouse-HRP (at 1:10000 dilution; Cell Signaling). Quantitative analysis of protein expression relative to GAPDH was done using Image Lab software (Bio-Rad).
Luminex immunoassay
TGF-β signaling pathway components were analyzed using the Milliplex Human TGF-β signaling 6-plex (Merck Millipore) and the Milliplex Human Multi-pathway 9-plex assay (Merck Millipore). Total TGF-β protein expression in cell lysates and cell culture supernatants were measured using the Milliplex Human TGF-β 1,2,3 assay (Merck Millipore). For Luminex analysis, the cells were treated with Dox to induce ERG expression. For collection, cell lysates and supernatants were centrifuged (15 min, 4000 rpm, 4°C) after 72 h of induction. Immunoassays using Luminex® xMAP® technology were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The fluorescent reporter signals were analyzed by a Bio-Plex 200 reader (Bio-Rad).
Ingenuity pathway analysis
Functional annotation and pathway enrichment of differentially regulated genes were identified using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) software (Qiagen). IPA uses the Ingenuity knowledge base, a database of protein and gene interactions integrated from published biomedical literature and 3rd party sources. Analysis using IPA was performed between December 2015 and February 2016 (Ingenuity version 26127183). Genes showing expression fold change > 1.5 were considered as differentially expressed and included in the analysis.
Functional annotations
Gene expression changes were categorized into functional annotations of molecular and cellular mechanisms. The Ingenuity knowledge base provides a predicted direction of change for the biological function (downstream effect analysis), represented by an activation z-score, where z > 2.0 or < −2.0 is predictive for activation or reduction of the process, respectively. A p-value < 0.05 indicates a statistically significant association between a set of differentially expressed genes and a given process.
Pathway enrichment analysis
Ingenuity knowledge base provides an analysis of metabolic and cell signaling pathways that are significantly enriched in the gene expression signature. Pathway significance values were calculated based on Fisher's right tailed exact test and the –log(p-value) by IPA. Pathways meeting the threshold p-value < 0.05 were considered as significant. Using the ‘Compare’ tool, IPA identified the intersection and unique gene sets among T/E III and T/E VI versus empty vector datasets. Upstream regulator analysis can identify molecules upstream of the genes in the dataset that potentially explain the observed gene expression changes and molecular functions. It is based on prior knowledge of expected effects between transcriptional regulators and their target genes stored in the Ingenuity knowledge base.
Statistical testing
Expression differences between the induced and uninduced cells were analyzed using a paired t-test and between induced cells of T/E III and VI by an unpaired t-test. Statistical significance of t-test depicted as *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS AND METHODS FIGURES AND TABLES
Acknowledgments
We thank Sabrina Gerhardt and Simon Ogrodnik for excellent technical assistance and Jan Mollenhauer for providing access to the LNCaP clones with modified Flp-In system. We thank the DKFZ Genomics and Proteomics Core Facility for performing Illumina Whole-Genome Expression Beadchips and associated statistical analyses.
Abbreviations
- ACPP
Acid phosphatase, prostate
- AKT
AKT serine/threonine kinase 1
- ALK1
Activin receptor-like kinase 1
- AR
Androgen receptor
- BAMBI
BMP and activin membrane-bound inhibitor
- BMP
Bone morphogenetic protein
- CD24
Cluster of differentiation 24
- CDH1
E-cadherin
- CDH2
N-cadherin
- CDK1
Cyclin-dependent kinase 1
- Dox
Doxycycline
- EMT
Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition
- ERG
V-ets erythroblastosis virus E26 homolog (avian)
- ERK2
Extracellular signal-regulated kinases, alias of MAPK1
- Ev
Empty vector
- FN1
Fibronectin 1
- FZD4
Frizzled 4
- GAPDH
Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
- GO
Gene Ontology
- ID1 and 2
Inhibitor of differentiation (1 and 2)
- IPA
Ingenuity Pathway Analysis
- JNK
c-Jun N-terminal kinases
- LRP5 and 6
Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 and 6
- MAPK
Mitogen-activated protein kinase
- MET
Mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition
- miR
micro-RNA
- MMP
Matrix metalloproteinase
- MSMB
Microseminoprotein beta
- P38
alias of MAPK14, mitogen-activated protein kinase 14
- pAKT
phospho-AKT
- PCa
Prostate cancer
- PI3K
Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase
- PLA1A
Phospholipase A1 member A
- PLAT
Plasminogen activator, tissue type
- p-p38
phospho-p38
- pSMAD
phospho-SMAD
- qPCR
quantitative reverse transcription PCR
- rhALK1
recombinant decoy receptor ALK1
- rhFZD4
recombinant decoy receptor FZD4
- RT-PCR
Reverse transcription PCR
- siRNA
small interfering RNA
- SLC45A3
Solute carrier family 45 member 3
- SMAD
SMAD family protein
- SNAI2
Snail family transcriptional repressor 2
- TCF7L2
T cell factor/lymphoid enhancer 2
- TCF/LEF-1
Transcription factor/lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1
- TDRD1
Tudor domain containing 1
- T/E
TMPRSS2:ERG
- TGF-β
Transforming growth factor beta
- TGFB1 and 2
TGF-β 1 and 2
- TMPRSS2
Transmembrane protease, serine 2
- VIM
Vimentin
- VTN
Vitronectin
- WNT
Wingless-type family member
- ZEB1
Zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1
Footnotes
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
FUNDING
This project was supported through intramural funding by the German Cancer Research Center.
Authors’ contributions
LR, SMK, PA, and HS designed and directed the study. LR, ML, LAK, SMW-B, YT, and SD performed experiments and summarized results. LR and ML analyzed data. LR, PA, SMK, and HS wrote and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
REFERENCES
- 1.Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J, Rosso S, Coebergh JW, Comber H, Forman D, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:1374–1403. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.12.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:87–108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tomlins SA, Rhodes DR, Perner S, Dhanasekaran SM, Mehra R, Sun XW, Varambally S, Cao X, Tchinda J, Kuefer R, Lee C, Montie JE, Shah RB, et al. Recurrent fusion of TMPRSS2 and ETS transcription factor genes in prostate cancer. Science. 2005;310:644–648. doi: 10.1126/science.1117679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tomlins SA, Bjartell A, Chinnaiyan AM, Jenster G, Nam RK, Rubin MA, Schalken JA. ETS gene fusions in prostate cancer: from discovery to daily clinical practice. Eur Urol. 2009;56:275–286. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.04.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tomlins SA, Laxman B, Varambally S, Cao X, Yu J, Helgeson BE, Cao Q, Prensner JR, Rubin MA, Shah RB, Mehra R, Chinnaiyan AM. Role of the TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion in prostate cancer. Neoplasia. 2008;10:177–188. doi: 10.1593/neo.07822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Perner S, Demichelis F, Beroukhim R, Schmidt FH, Mosquera JM, Setlur S, Tchinda J, Tomlins SA, Hofer MD, Pienta KG, Kuefer R, Vessella R, Sun XW, et al. TMPRSS2: ERG fusion-associated deletions provide insight into the heterogeneity of prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2006;66:8337–8341. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hu Y, Dobi A, Sreenath T, Cook C, Tadase AY, Ravindranath L, Cullen J, Furusato B, Chen Y, Thangapazham RL, Mohamed A, Sun C, Sesterhenn IA, et al. Delineation of TMPRSS2-ERG splice variants in prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:4719–4725. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Linn DE, Penney KL, Bronson RT, Mucci LA, Li Z. Deletion of Interstitial Genes between TMPRSS2 and ERG Promotes Prostate Cancer Progression. Cancer Res. 2016;76:1869–1881. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-1911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Clark J, Merson S, Jhavar S, Flohr P, Edwards S, Foster CS, Eeles R, Martin FL, Phillips DH, Crundwell M, Christmas T, Thompson A, Fisher C, et al. Diversity of TMPRSS2-ERG fusion transcripts in the human prostate. Oncogene. 2007;26:2667–2673. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wang J, Cai Y, Ren C, Ittmann M. Expression of variant TMPRSS2/ERG fusion messenger RNAs is associated with aggressive prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2006;66:8347–8351. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang J, Cai Y, Shao LJ, Siddiqui J, Palanisamy N, Li R, Ren C, Ayala G, Ittmann M. Activation of NF-{kappa}B by TMPRSS2/ERG Fusion Isoforms through Toll-Like Receptor-4. Cancer Res. 2011;71:1325–1333. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wang J, Cai Y, Yu W, Ren C, Spencer DM, Ittmann M. Pleiotropic biological activities of alternatively spliced TMPRSS2/ERG fusion gene transcripts. Cancer Res. 2008;68:8516–8524. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Brase JC, Johannes M, Mannsperger H, Falth M, Metzger J, Kacprzyk LA, Andrasiuk T, Gade S, Meister M, Sirma H, Sauter G, Simon R, Schlomm T, et al. TMPRSS2-ERG -specific transcriptional modulation is associated with prostate cancer biomarkers and TGF-beta signaling. BMC cancer. 2011;11:507. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Oft M, Heider KH, Beug H. TGFbeta signaling is necessary for carcinoma cell invasiveness and metastasis. Curr Biol. 1998;8:1243–1252. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(07)00533-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Komiya Y, Habas R. Wnt signal transduction pathways. Organogenesis. 2008;4:68–75. doi: 10.4161/org.4.2.5851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lamouille S, Xu J, Derynck R. Molecular mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15:178–196. doi: 10.1038/nrm3758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mertz KD, Setlur SR, Dhanasekaran SM, Demichelis F, Perner S, Tomlins S, Tchinda J, Laxman B, Vessella RL, Beroukhim R, Lee C, Chinnaiyan AM, Rubin MA. Molecular characterization of TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion in the NCI-H660 prostate cancer cell line: a new perspective for an old model. Neoplasia. 2007;9:200–206. doi: 10.1593/neo.07103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yu J, Yu J, Mani RS, Cao Q, Brenner CJ, Cao X, Wang X, Wu L, Li J, Hu M, Gong Y, Cheng H, Laxman B, et al. An integrated network of androgen receptor, polycomb, and TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusions in prostate cancer progression. Cancer Cell. 2010;17:443–454. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.03.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sun C, Dobi A, Mohamed A, Li H, Thangapazham RL, Furusato B, Shaheduzzaman S, Tan SH, Vaidyanathan G, Whitman E, Hawksworth DJ, Chen Y, Nau M, et al. TMPRSS2-ERG fusion, a common genomic alteration in prostate cancer activates C-MYC and abrogates prostate epithelial differentiation. Oncogene. 2008;27:5348–5353. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Buttice G, Duterque-Coquillaud M, Basuyaux JP, Carrere S, Kurkinen M, Stehelin D. Erg, an Ets-family member, differentially regulates human collagenase1 (MMP1) and stromelysin1 (MMP3) gene expression by physically interacting with the Fos/Jun complex. Oncogene. 1996;13:2297–2306. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Moustakas A, Heldin CH. Non-Smad TGF-beta signals. J Cell Sci. 2005;118:3573–3584. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhang YE. Non-Smad pathways in TGF-beta signaling. Cell Res. 2009;19:128–139. doi: 10.1038/cr.2008.328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ao M, Williams K, Bhowmick NA, Hayward SW. Transforming growth factor-beta promotes invasion in tumorigenic but not in nontumorigenic human prostatic epithelial cells. Cancer Res. 2006;66:8007–8016. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-4451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Weidle UH, Schneider B, Georges G, Brinkmann U. Genetically engineered fusion proteins for treatment of cancer. Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2012;9:357–372. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sanvitale CE, Kerr G, Chaikuad A, Ramel MC, Mohedas AH, Reichert S, Wang Y, Triffitt JT, Cuny GD, Yu PB, Hill CS, Bullock AN. A new class of small molecule inhibitor of BMP signaling. PLoS One. 2013;8:e62721. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Miyazono K, Miyazawa K. Id: a target of BMP signaling. Sci STKE. 2002;2002:pe40. doi: 10.1126/stke.2002.151.pe40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wiercinska E, Wickert L, Denecke B, Said HM, Hamzavi J, Gressner AM, Thorikay M, ten Dijke P, Mertens PR, Breitkopf K, Dooley S. Id1 is a critical mediator in TGF-beta-induced transdifferentiation of rat hepatic stellate cells. Hepatology. 2006;43:1032–1041. doi: 10.1002/hep.21135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Li Y, Li W, Ying Z, Tian H, Zhu X, Li J, Li M. Metastatic heterogeneity of breast cancer cells is associated with expression of a heterogeneous TGFbeta-activating miR424–503 gene cluster. Cancer Res. 2014;74:6107–6118. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Butz H, Racz K, Hunyady L, Patocs A. Crosstalk between TGF-beta signaling and the microRNA machinery. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2012;33:382–393. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2012.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Leshem O, Madar S, Kogan-Sakin I, Kamer I, Goldstein I, Brosh R, Cohen Y, Jacob-Hirsch J, Ehrlich M, Ben-Sasson S, Goldfinger N, Loewenthal R, Gazit E, et al. TMPRSS2/ERG promotes epithelial to mesenchymal transition through the ZEB1/ZEB2 axis in a prostate cancer model. PLoS One. 2011;6:e21650. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lang SH, Hyde C, Reid IN, Hitchcock IS, Hart CA, Bryden AA, Villette JM, Stower MJ, Maitland NJ. Enhanced expression of vimentin in motile prostate cell lines and in poorly differentiated and metastatic prostate carcinoma. Prostate. 2002;52:253–263. doi: 10.1002/pros.10088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wei J, Xu G, Wu M, Zhang Y, Li Q, Liu P, Zhu T, Song A, Zhao L, Han Z, Chen G, Wang S, Meng L, et al. Overexpression of vimentin contributes to prostate cancer invasion and metastasis via src regulation. Anticancer Res. 2008;28:327–334. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Becker-Santos DD, Guo Y, Ghaffari M, Vickers ED, Lehman M, Altamirano-Dimas M, Oloumi A, Furukawa J, Sharma M, Wang Y, Dedhar S, Cox ME. Integrin-linked kinase as a target for ERG-mediated invasive properties in prostate cancer models. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33:2558–2567. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgs285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zhang Q, Helfand BT, Jang TL, Zhu LJ, Chen L, Yang XJ, Kozlowski J, Smith N, Kundu SD, Yang G, Raji AA, Javonovic B, Pins M, et al. Nuclear factor-kappaB-mediated transforming growth factor-beta-induced expression of vimentin is an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:3557–3567. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Owens P, Polikowsky H, Pickup MW, Gorska AE, Jovanovic B, Shaw AK, Novitskiy SV, Hong CC, Moses HL. Bone Morphogenetic Proteins stimulate mammary fibroblasts to promote mammary carcinoma cell invasion. PLoS One. 2013;8:e67533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yang S, Pham LK, Liao CP, Frenkel B, Reddi AH, Roy-Burman P. A novel bone morphogenetic protein signaling in heterotypic cell interactions in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2008;68:198–205. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bubendorf L, Schopfer A, Wagner U, Sauter G, Moch H, Willi N, Gasser TC, Mihatsch MJ. Metastatic patterns of prostate cancer: an autopsy study of 1,589 patients. Hum Pathol. 2000;31:578–583. doi: 10.1053/hp.2000.6698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wikstrom P, Stattin P, Franck-Lissbrant I, Damber JE, Bergh A. Transforming growth factor beta1 is associated with angiogenesis, metastasis, and poor clinical outcome in prostate cancer. Prostate. 1998;37:19–29. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0045(19980915)37:1<19::aid-pros4>3.0.co;2-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Shariat SF, Shalev M, Menesses-Diaz A, Kim IY, Kattan MW, Wheeler TM, Slawin KM. Preoperative plasma levels of transforming growth factor beta(1) (TGF-beta(1)) strongly predict progression in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:2856–2864. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.11.2856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Haider M, Zhang X, Coleman I, Ericson N, True LD, Lam HM, Brown LG, Ketchanji M, Nghiem B, Lakely B, Coleman R, Montgomery B, Lange PH, et al. Epithelial mesenchymal-like transition occurs in a subset of cells in castration resistant prostate cancer bone metastases. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2016;33:239–248. doi: 10.1007/s10585-015-9773-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Goumans MJ, Valdimarsdottir G, Itoh S, Rosendahl A, Sideras P, ten Dijke P. Balancing the activation state of the endothelium via two distinct TGF-beta type I receptors. EMBO J. 2002;21:1743–1753. doi: 10.1093/emboj/21.7.1743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.David L, Mallet C, Mazerbourg S, Feige JJ, Bailly S. Identification of BMP9 and BMP10 as functional activators of the orphan activin receptor-like kinase 1 (ALK1) in endothelial cells. Blood. 2007;109:1953–1961. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-07-034124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ota T, Fujii M, Sugizaki T, Ishii M, Miyazawa K, Aburatani H, Miyazono K. Targets of transcriptional regulation by two distinct type I receptors for transforming growth factor-beta in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. J Cell Physiol. 2002;193:299–318. doi: 10.1002/jcp.10170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Stankic M, Pavlovic S, Chin Y, Brogi E, Padua D, Norton L, Massague J, Benezra R. TGF-beta-Id1 signaling opposes Twist1 and promotes metastatic colonization via a mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition. Cell Rep. 2013;5:1228–1242. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.11.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Cunha SI, Bocci M, Lovrot J, Eleftheriou N, Roswall P, Cordero E, Lindstrom L, Bartoschek M, Haller BK, Pearsall RS, Mulivor AW, Kumar R, Larsson C, et al. Endothelial ALK1 Is a Therapeutic Target to Block Metastatic Dissemination of Breast Cancer. Cancer Res. 2015;75:2445–2456. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-3706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Mitchell D, Pobre EG, Mulivor AW, Grinberg AV, Castonguay R, Monnell TE, Solban N, Ucran JA, Pearsall RS, Underwood KW, Seehra J, Kumar R. ALK1-Fc inhibits multiple mediators of angiogenesis and suppresses tumor growth. Mol Cancer Ther. 2010;9:379–388. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-0650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Van Obberghen-Schilling E, Roche NS, Flanders KC, Sporn MB, Roberts AB. Transforming growth factor beta 1 positively regulates its own expression in normal and transformed cells. J Biol Chem. 1988;263:7741–7746. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zavadil J, Bottinger EP. TGF-beta and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transitions. Oncogene. 2005;24:5764–5774. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Gupta S, Iljin K, Sara H, Mpindi JP, Mirtti T, Vainio P, Rantala J, Alanen K, Nees M, Kallioniemi O. FZD4 as a mediator of ERG oncogene-induced WNT signaling and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in human prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2010;70:6735–6745. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-0244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wu L, Zhao JC, Kim J, Jin HJ, Wang CY, Yu J. ERG is a critical regulator of Wnt/LEF1 signaling in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2013;73:6068–6079. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Herzig M, Savarese F, Novatchkova M, Semb H, Christofori G. Tumor progression induced by the loss of E-cadherin independent of beta-catenin/Tcf-mediated Wnt signaling. Oncogene. 2007;26:2290–2298. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kavsak P, Rasmussen RK, Causing CG, Bonni S, Zhu H, Thomsen GH, Wrana JL. Smad7 binds to Smurf2 to form an E3 ubiquitin ligase that targets the TGF beta receptor for degradation. Mol Cell. 2000;6:1365–1375. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)00134-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Tang Y, Liu Z, Zhao L, Clemens TL, Cao X. Smad7 stabilizes beta-catenin binding to E-cadherin complex and promotes cell-cell adhesion. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:23956–23963. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M800351200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Zhu H, Li Y, Qu S, Luo H, Zhou Y, Wang Y, Zhao H, You Y, Xiao X, Zuo X. MicroRNA expression abnormalities in limited cutaneous scleroderma and diffuse cutaneous scleroderma. J Clin Immunol. 2012;32:514–522. doi: 10.1007/s10875-011-9647-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Llobet-Navas D, Rodriguez-Barrueco R, Castro V, Ugalde AP, Sumazin P, Jacob-Sendler D, Demircan B, Castillo-Martin M, Putcha P, Marshall N, Villagrasa P, Chan J, Sanchez-Garcia F, et al. The miR-424 (322)/503 cluster orchestrates remodeling of the epithelium in the involuting mammary gland. Genes Dev. 2014;28:765–782. doi: 10.1101/gad.237404.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Watahiki A, Wang Y, Morris J, Dennis K, O‘Dwyer HM, Gleave M, Gout PW, Wang Y. MicroRNAs associated with metastatic prostate cancer. PLoS One. 2011;6:e24950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Oneyama C, Kito Y, Asai R, Ikeda J, Yoshida T, Okuzaki D, Kokuda R, Kakumoto K, Takayama K, Inoue S, Morii E, Okada M. MiR-424/503-mediated Rictor upregulation promotes tumor progression. PLoS One. 2013;8:e80300. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Jiang X, Chen Y, Du E, Yang K, Zhang Z, Qi S, Xu Y. GATA3-driven expression of miR-503 inhibits prostate cancer progression by repressing ZNF217 expression. Cell Signal. 2016;28:1216–1224. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2016.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Vecchia L, Olivieri C, Scotti C. Activin Receptor-like kinase 1: a novel anti-angiogenesis target from TGF-beta family. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2013;13:1398–1406. doi: 10.2174/13895575113139990065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Bendell JC, Gordon MS, Hurwitz HI, Jones SF, Mendelson DS, Blobe GC, Agarwal N, Condon CH, Wilson D, Pearsall AE, Yang Y, McClure T, Attie KM, et al. Safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of dalantercept, an activin receptor-like kinase-1 ligand trap, in patients with advanced cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:480–489. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-1840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Castro F, Dirks WG, Fahnrich S, Hotz-Wagenblatt A, Pawlita M, Schmitt M. High-throughput SNP-based authentication of human cell lines. Int J Cancer. 2013;132:308–314. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Schmitt M, Pawlita M. High-throughput detection and multiplex identification of cell contaminations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:e119. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:e45. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.9.e45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.