Summary
Little is known about a possible interaction of natural killer (NK) cells with regulatory T cells (Treg) in long‐term stable kidney transplant recipients. Absolute counts of lymphocyte and Treg subsets were studied in whole blood samples of 136 long‐term stable renal transplant recipients and 52 healthy controls using eight‐colour fluorescence flow cytometry. Patients were 1946 ± 2201 days (153–10 268 days) post‐transplant and showed a serum creatinine of 1·7 ± 0·7 mg/dl. Renal transplant recipients investigated > 1·5 years post‐transplant showed higher total NK cell counts than recipients studied < 1·5 years after transplantation (P = 0·006). High NK cells were associated with high glomerular filtration rate (P = 0·002) and low serum creatinine (P = 0·005). Interestingly, high NK cells were associated with high CD4+CD25+CD127–forkhead box protein 3 (FoxP3+) Treg that co‐express the phenotype Helios+interferon (IFN)‐γ– and appear to have stable FoxP3 expression and originate from the thymus. Furthermore, high total NK cells were associated with Treg that co‐express the phenotypes interleukin (IL)−10–transforming growth factor (TGF)‐β+ (P = 0·013), CD183+CD62L– (P = 0·003), CD183+CD62+(P = 0·001), CD183–CD62L+ (P = 0·002), CD252–CD152+ (P < 0·001), CD28+human leucocyte antigen D‐related (HLA‐DR–) (P = 0·002), CD28+HLA‐DR+ (P < 0·001), CD95+CD178– (P < 0·001) and CD279–CD152+ (P < 0·001), suggesting that these activated Treg home in peripheral tissues and suppress effector cells via TGF‐β and cytotoxic T lymphocyte‐associated protein 4 (CTLA‐4). The higher numbers of NK and Treg cell counts in patients with long‐term good allograft function and the statistical association of these two lymphocyte subsets with each other suggest a direct or indirect (via DC) interaction of these cell subpopulations that contributes to good long‐term allograft acceptance. Moreover, we speculate that regulatory NK cells are formed late post‐transplant that are able to inhibit graft‐reactive effector cells.
Keywords: CD8+ lymphocytes, CTLA‐4, good long‐term renal allograft function, glomerular filtration rate, Helios+IFN‐γ– Treg, peripheral NK cells, serum creatinine, TGF‐β, Treg subsets
Introduction
The role of natural killer (NK) cells in solid organ and bone marrow transplantation remains somewhat unclear 1, 2. NK cells are thought to represent cytotoxic effector cells involved in immune responses against virus, tumour cells and allografts 3, 4, 5. Additionally, immunoregulatory NK cells with phenotype and cytokine patterns different from cytotoxic effector NK cells have been described, and are thought to be involved in successful pregnancy 4, 6, 7, 8. Biomarkers associated with tolerance following kidney transplantation are dominated by increases in peripheral B cell numbers and the expression of B cell‐related genes in blood lymphocytes, as well as defects in B cell maturation and evidence of active suppression mediated by B cells in vitro, as reviewed by Newell and Turka 9. Sagoo et al. reported that tolerant renal transplant recipients displayed an expansion of peripheral blood B and NK lymphocytes, reduced activated CD4+ T cells, a lack of donor‐specific antibodies, donor‐specific hyporesponsiveness of CD4+ T cells and a high ratio of forkhead box P3 (FoxP3) to alpha‐1,2‐mannosidase gene expression 10. In addition, biomarkers associated with tolerance following liver transplantation are related predominantly to NK cells and γδ T cells in the blood and genes related to iron homeostasis within the graft 9. Tolerant recipients display an increased proportion of NK cells and a decreased proportion of Vδ2 γδ T cells in their peripheral blood 9. An increase in the proportion of CD4+CD25+CD127–FoxP3+ T cells in the blood was also noted, albeit only 12 months following discontinuation of immunosuppression 9. Control of NK cell function by CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells was observed in several studies 11. Toll‐like receptor (TLR)−9‐engaged plasmacytoid dendritic cells (DC) represent a critical stimulus for human NK cells, and CD4+ T helper cells (Th) cells and CD4+CD25hi regulatory T cells (Treg) play an important role in modulating human NK cell responses 12. Jukes et al. reported on a bystander activation of invariant NK (iNK) T cells that occurs during conventional T cell alloresponses 13. In the setting of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, murine and human in‐vitro experiments support the assertion that Treg antagonize NK responses 2. Some studies support an augmented NK cell response in the absence of Treg, as reviewed by Verneris 2. Others reported that murine NK cells delay allograft rejection in lymphopenic hosts by down‐regulating the homeostatic proliferation of CD8+ T cells 14. In haemodialyzed and kidney transplanted patients, innate‐like and conventional T cell populations were shown to be equally compromised 15. Padroza‐Pacheco et al. reviewed the interaction between NK cells and Treg for future perspectives of immunotherapy 16.
In the present study, several Treg subsets were analysed 17, 18, 19, 20, 21. Signalling through interferon (IFN)‐γR and interleukin (IL)−12R, in combination with T cell receptor (TCR) engagement, induces strong expression of the transcription factor T‐bet, which drives the differentiation of conventional T cells to a Th1 lineage 22. Up‐regulation of the transcription factor Helios modulates and stabilizes FoxP3 expression 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30. Helios is expressed on the majority of thymus‐derived Treg (tTreg) 31; however, part of the tTreg lack Helios expression 32. Peripherally induced Treg (pTreg) do not express Helios 31, but are able to up‐regulate Helios in combination with FoxP3 during cell activation 33, 34. Thymic tTreg were shown to have stable FoxP3 expression in contrast to peripherally induced pTreg presenting FoxP3 only transiently, with the risk of reprogramming from Treg to Th1 effector cells 19, 35. McClymont et al. reported that the majority of in‐vitro‐induced IFN‐γ+ Treg did not express Helios, suggesting that they were generated extra‐thymically 36. Alternatively, they might belong to a minority of Helios– tTreg expressing FoxP3, CD39, cytotoxic T lymphocyte‐associated protein 4 (CTLA‐4), CCL3 and IFN‐γ, as published by Himmel et al. 32. Further experiments showed that tTreg can polarize towards IFN‐γ+ T cells in‐vitro by interleukin (IL)−12 conditioning, whereby they remain Helios+, suggesting that part of the thymic‐derived Treg population exhibits plasticity in cytokine production and expresses a Th1‐like phenotype 36. As shown in the blood of healthy individuals, Helios+IFN‐γ+ Treg co‐express TGF‐β but not IL‐10. Further analysis of Treg phenotypes showed that Treg co‐expressed granzyme B and perforin in‐addition, as well as Fas (CD95) and FasL (CD178), thereby affording the Treg the capacity to induce lysis and apoptosis of target cells 37. Moreover, expression of CTLA‐4 (CD152) and CD40L (CD154) imply cell–cell contact‐dependent immunosuppression by these Treg subsets. CXCR3 and CD62L expression suggests that part of these cells have the potential to enter secondary lymphoid organs as well as inflamed tissues 38, 39. These Treg exhibit Th1 characteristic properties such as IFN‐γR1 (CD119) and T‐bet expression, which means they have the potency to regulate expression as well as consumption of IFN‐γ in the cell. CD28 is involved in Treg activation and human leucocyte antigen D‐related (HLA‐DR) expression indicates activation of Treg 40.
A possible relationship or interaction of NK cells and Treg in renal transplant recipients has not been examined previously. In the present study, we looked for a possible association of NK cells with certain Treg subsets in patients with good long‐term renal allograft acceptance. If evidence for such an association could be found, it would suggest a direct or indirect (via DC) immunoregulatory interaction of these two lymphocyte subpopulations.
Methods
Healthy controls and patients
Laboratory staff served as healthy controls. All controls (n = 52) and renal transplant recipients (n = 136) gave informed consent for the tests performed within this study and the study was approved by the local ethical committee (S‐225/2014). The study was conducted in adherence to the Declaration of Helsinki. The mean age of patients was 49 ± 13 years (range = 19–76 years) and that of healthy controls was 41 ± 12 (range = 20–60) years (Table 1). Patients were 1946 ± 2201 days (range = 153–10 268 days) post‐transplant and showed a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 48 ± 20 ml/min (range = 11–111 ml/min) and a serum creatinine of 1·7 ± 0·7 mg/dl (range = 0·7–4·6 mg/dl) (Fig. 1). Blood for the tests was obtained during regular routine investigations in the out‐patient clinic. At the time of testing, the patients showed no signs of acute rejection or infection. All patients received standard immunosuppression, consisting of combinations of cyclosporin A, tacrolimus, steroids, mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine (Table 1).
Table 1.
Demographic data of patients and healthy controls
| Category | Patients, n (%) | Healthy Controls |
|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||
| Male | 91 (67%) | 26 (49%) |
| Female | 45 (33%) | 26 (51%) |
| Age, mean, years | 49 ± 13 | 41 ± 12 |
| Range, years | 19 + 76 | 20 + 60 |
| Graft no. | ||
| First | 115 (84%) | + |
| Second | 16 (12%), | + |
| Third | 5 (4%) | + |
| End‐stage renal disease | ||
| Chronic GN | 35 (26%) | + |
| Diabetes | 8 (6%) | + |
| Hypertension/ischaemic | 4 (3%) | + |
| Nephrosclerosis | 8 (6%) | + |
| Pyelonephritis | 8 (6%) | + |
| Polycystic | 24 (18%) | + |
| IGA nephropathy | 17 (13%) | + |
| Other | 32 (24%) | + |
| Clinical follow up | ||
| 5 months–1·5 years | 39 (29%) | + |
| >1·5–5 | 54 (40%) | + |
| >5–10 | 19 (14%) | + |
| >10–20 | 14 (10%) | + |
| >20 | 10 (7%) | + |
| Donor | ||
| Living | 54 (40%) | + |
| Deceased | 82 (60%) | + |
| HLA‐ABDR MM | ||
| 0 | 19 (14%) | + |
| 1 | 6 (4%) | + |
| 2 | 29 (21%) | + |
| 3 | 34 (25%) | + |
| 4 | 20 (15%) | + |
| 5 | 24 (18%) | + |
| 6 | 4 (3%) | + |
| ABO incompatible transplants | ||
| Yes | 14 (10%) | + |
| No | 122 (90%) | + |
| Serum creatinine, mg/dl | ||
| < 2 | 97 (71%) | + |
| ≥ 2 | 39 (29%) | + |
| GFR, ml/min | ||
| < 60 | 101 (74%) | + |
| ≥ 60 | 35 (26%) | + |
| Patients with | ||
| 1st investigation | 136 (100%) | + |
| 2nd investigation | 59 (43%) | + |
| 3rd investigation | 11 (8%) | + |
| Rejection | ||
| Banff Ia, Ib, II | 9 (7%) | + |
| Non‐rejected | 109 (80%) | + |
| Unknown | 18 (13%) | + |
| Immunosuppressive protocol | ||
| Steroids | 82 (60%) | + |
| Cyclosporin | 20 (15%) | + |
| Tacrolimus | 104 (76%) | + |
| MMF | 91 (67%) | + |
| AZA | 15 (11%) | + |
GN = glomerulonephritis; IgA = immunoglobulin A; HLA = human leucocyte antigen; GFR = glomerular filtration rate; MMF = mycophenolate mofetil; AZA = azathioprine.
Figure 1.

Graft function of long‐term stable kidney transplant recipients. Patients (n = 136) were 1946 ± 2201 days (153–10 268 days) post‐transplant and showed a serum creatinine of 1·7 ± 0·7 mg/dl (0·7–4·6 mg/dl).
Determination of lymphocyte subpopulations
Because the combination of phycoerythrin‐labelled CD16 and CD56 monoclonal antibody was used, peripheral blood levels of total NK cells included CD16+CD56+, CD16–CD56+ and CD16+CD56– subpopulations of NK cells 18. In detail, using four‐colour fluorescence flow cytometry CD45+CD3+CD16–CD56–CD19–, CD45+CD3–CD16+/–CD56+/–CD19–, CD45+CD3–CD16–CD56–CD19+, CD45+CD3+CD4+CD8– and CD45+CD3+CD4–CD8+ lymphocyte subsets were defined. As isotype controls served immunoglobulin (Ig)G2a/fluorescein isothiocyanate, IgG2a/phycoerythrin, IgG2a/allophycocyanin and IgG2a/peridinin–chlorophyll–protein complex antibodies. All antibodies (CD45: clone 2D1; CD3: clone SK7; CD4: clone SK3, CD8: clone SK1; CD19: clone SJ25C1; CD16: clone B73.1; CD56: clone NCAM16.2) were purchased from Becton Dickinson (BD)/Pharmingen (Heidelberg, Germany). Ten microlitres (µl) of a mixture of four different monoclonal antibodies conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate, phycoerythrin, allophycocyanin or peridinin–chlorophyll–protein complex were added to 50 µl of heparinized whole blood and incubated for 15 min at room temperature. Erythrocytes were lysed with NH4Cl for 15 min. Lymphocyte subsets were analysed using a fluorescence‐activated cell sorter (FACS)Calibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany). The flow cytometer was calibrated every day using CaliBRITE beads (BD Pharmingen) to ensure optimal counting.
Determination of different Treg subsets
Treg subsets were determined as described previously 21. The exact gate settings of the present study are depicted in Fig. 2. For analysis of determinants on the cell surface, peripheral blood leucocytes (PBL) were incubated with fluorochrome‐labelled monoclonal antibodies against CD4 (clone PRA‐4), CD25 (IL‐2R; clone M‐A251), CD28 (clone CD28‐2), CD62L (L‐selectin; clone DREG‐56), CD95 (Fas; clone DX2), CD119 (IFN‐γR; clone GIR‐208), CD127 (clone: HIL‐7R‐M21), CD152 (CTLA‐4; clone: BNI3), CD154 (CD40L; clone: TRAP1), CD178 (FasL; NOK‐1), CD252 (OX40L; clone: IK‐1), CD279 (PD‐1; clone MIH4), HLA‐DR (clone: G46‐6) and CD183 (CXCR3; clone IC6/CXCR3) (all from BD Biosciences). Intracellular determinants were stained with fluorochrome‐labelled monoclonal antibodies against FoxP3 (clone: 236A/E7), IFN‐γ (clone B27), IL‐10 (clone: JES3‐19F1), granzyme B (clone: GB11), perforin (clone: δG9), T‐bet (clone: 04‐46) (all from BD Biosciences), Helios (clone: 22F6) (eBioscience, Frankfurt, Germany) and TGF‐β1 (clone: 27232) (R&D systems, Wiesbaden, Germany). Briefly, PBL were incubated with combinations of monoclonal antibodies for 30 min as described and eight‐colour fluorescence was analysed using a FACSCanto II triple‐laser flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). When, in addition, intracellular proteins were studied, cell membranes were permeabilized using BD perm/wash buffer (BD Biosciences). At least 100 000 events were analysed in the initial forward‐/side‐scatter (FSC/SSC) dot‐plot. Total CD4+CD25+FoxP3+CD127– Treg as well as subsets of CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ CD127– Treg co‐expressing CD28, CD62L (L‐selectin), CD95 (Fas), CD119 (IFN‐γR), CD152 (CTLA‐4), CD154 (CD40L), CD178 (FasL), CD252 (OX40L), CD279 [programmed death 1 (PD‐1)], HLA‐DR, CD183 (CXCR3), IFN‐γ, IL‐10, granzyme B, perforin, T‐bet, Helios and TGF‐β1 were studied.
Figure 2.

Determination of regulatory T cell (Treg) subsets. Gates were set according to the corresponding isotype controls (isotype controls not shown). Stepwise gating strategy for Treg subset determination: first, lymphocytes gate (P1), then CD4+CD25+ peripheral blood lymphocyte (PBL) gate (P2), and finally forkhead box protein 3 (FoxP3+)CD127– gate (P3). Further CD4+CD25+FoxP3+CD127– Treg subsets (based on gate P3) were analysed using the depicted gate settings for Helios/interferon (IFN)‐γ, interleukin (IL)−10/transforming growth factor (TGF)‐β, CD183/CD62L, CD252/CD152 (CD152 intracellular), CD119/T‐bet, CD28/human leucocyte antigen D‐related (HLA‐DR), CD152/CD154 (both surfaces), perforin/granzyme B, CD95/CD178, and CD279/CD152 (CD152 intracellular). The depicted analysis is based on 100 000 events in the initial forward‐/side‐scatter (FSC/SSC) dot‐plot (P1).
Statistical analysis
For statistical analysis, PASW statistics program version 21 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA), Spearman's rank correlation and Mann–Whitney U‐tests were used. P‐values < 0·01 after Bonferroni's correction were considered significant. Simple linear regression was conducted first to determine the influence of NK cells, CD8+ and CD4+ T and CD19+ B lymphocytes on different Treg subsets in univariate analysis. Thereafter, and before running multivariate regression analysis, cell subset distributions were explored and log‐transformed when necessary to meet the criteria of this analysis. A backstep elimination model was used in which variables that produced P‐values < 0·05 were considered.
Results
Demographic data are summarized in Table 1 and the panels of lymphocyte and CD4+CD25+FoxP3+CD127– Treg subsets analysed are shown in Table 2.
Table 2.
T lymphocyte and regulatory T cell (Treg) subset counts in the blood of healthy individuals and patients
| Healthy controls (n = 52) mean ± s.d. | Patients (n = 136) mean ± s.d. | P * | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total CD45+ lymphocytes/µl | 1836 ± 496 | 1444 ± 817 | < 0·001 |
| %CD3+ | 73 ± 5·2 | 78 ± 11 | < 0·001 |
| CD3+/µl | 1345 ± 401 | 1151 ± 718 | 0·001 |
| %CD4+ | 45 ± 8·92 | 45 ± 13 | 0·611 |
| CD4+/µl | 821 ± 298 | 666 ± 420 | 0·001 |
| %CD8+ | 26 ± 7·4 | 31 ± 13 | 0·031 |
| CD8+/µl | 473 ± 201 | 461 ± 403 | 0·045 |
| % Total NK (CD16+/–CD56+/–) | 13 ± 4·3 | 13 ± 9·6 | 0·152 |
| Total NK/µl (CD16+/–CD56+/–) | 228 ± 98 | 165 ± 134 | < 0·001 |
| %CD19+ | 12 ± 4·8 | 6·8 ± 5·2 | < 0·001 |
| CD19+/µl | 223 ± 97 | 101 ± 106 | < 0·001 |
| CD4+CD25+FoxP3+CD127–/µl (Treg) | 6·3 ± 3·7 | 3·6 ± 3·4 | < 0·001 |
| IFN‐γ–Helios+ Treg/µl | 3·4 ± 2·5 | 1·6 ± 1·8 | < 0·001 |
| IFN‐γ–Helios– Treg/µl | 3·2 ± 1·8 | 2·3 ± 2·4 | < 0·001 |
| IFN‐γ+Helios+ Treg/µl | 0·19 ± 0·37 | 0·09 ± 0·18 | 0·007 |
| IFN‐γ+Helios– Treg/µl | 0·08 ± 0·18 | 0·09 ± 0·16 | 0·586 |
| IL‐10+TGF‐β– Treg/µl | 0·00 ± 0·00 | 0·01 ± 0·08 | 0·383 |
| IL‐10*TGF‐β+ Treg/µl | 0·00 ± 0·00 | 0·02 ± 0·20 | 0·165 |
| IL‐10–TGF‐β+ Treg/µl | 0·63 ± 1·0 | 0·68 ± 0·88 | 0·380 |
| CD183+CD62L– Treg/µl | 0·31 ± 0·40 | 0·27 ± 0·37 | 0·442 |
| CD183+CD62L+ Treg/µl | 2·1 ± 1·7 | 0·93 ± 1·1 | < 0·001 |
| CD183–CD62L+ Treg/µl | 3·1 ± 2·0 | 1·9 ± 2·0 | 0·001 |
| CD252+CD152– Treg/µl | 0·07 ± 0·23 | 0·07 ± 0·42 | 0·359 |
| CD252+CD152+ Treg/µl | 0·02 ± 0·12 | 0·01 ± 0·04 | 0·633 |
| CD252–CD152+ Treg/µl | 2·1 ± 1·7 | 0·92 ± 1·3 | < 0·001 |
| Perforin+granzyme B– Treg/µl | 0·04 ± 0·08 | 0·07 ± 0·21 | 0·756 |
| Perforin+granzyme B+ Treg/µl | 4·9 ± 11 | 4·3 ± 15 | 0·912 |
| Perforin–granzyme B+ Treg/µl | 2·2 ± 4·1 | 4·2 ± 11 | 0·106 |
| CD28+HLA‐DR– Treg/µl | 2·7 ± 1·7 | 1·8 ± 1·7 | < 0·001 |
| CD28+HLADR+ Treg/µl | 2·6 ± 2·4 | 1·2 ± 1·4 | < 0·001 |
| CD28–HLA‐DR+ Treg/µl | 0·12 ± 0·18 | 0·24 ± 0·52 | 0·591 |
| CD95+CD178– Treg/µl | 4·7 ± 3·2 | 2·6 ± 2·4 | < 0·001 |
| CD95+CD178+ Treg/µl | 0·01 ± 0·02 | 0·00 ± 0·02 | 0·382 |
| CD95–CD178+ Treg/µl | 0·02 ± 0·05 | 0·01 ± 0·04 | 0·353 |
| CD152+CD154– Treg/µl | 0·04 ± 0·07 | 0·06 ± 0·30 | 0·041 |
| CD152+CD154+ Treg/µl | 0·00 ± 0·00 | 0·00 ± 0·02 | 0·383 |
| CD152–CD154+ Treg/µl | 0·03 ± 0·10 | 0·00 ± 0·02 | 0·006 |
| CD119+T‐bet– Treg/µl | 0·21 ± 0·41 | 0·20 ± 0·26 | 0·816 |
| CD119+T‐bet+ Treg/µl | 0·01 ± 0·04 | 0·00 ± 0·03 | 0·512 |
| CD119–T‐bet+ Treg/µl | 0·03 ± 0·07 | 0·02 ± 0·06 | 0·210 |
| CD279+CD152– Treg/µl | 0·05 ± 0·19 | 0·06 ± 0·32 | 0·939 |
| CD279+CD152+ Treg/µl | 0·07 ± 0·14 | 0·02 ± 0·06 | < 0·001 |
| CD279–CD152+ Treg/µl | 2·0 ± 1·5 | 0·84 ± 1·1 | 0·001 |
*Mann–Whitney U ‐test: patients versus healthy individuals. All data are given as mean ± standard deviation (s.d.). P‐values < 0·01 were considered significant (Bonferroni correction). HLA‐DR = human leucocyte antigen D‐related; FoxP3 = forkhead box protein 3; IL= interleukin; IFN = interferon; TGF = transforming growth factor; NK = natural killer.
Lymphocyte and Treg subsets in patients and healthy controls
Compared to healthy controls, the patients with well‐functioning grafts showed lower relative and absolute counts of CD19+ B lymphocytes (both P < 0·001; Mann–Whitney U‐test), indicating a B lymphocyte deficiency in patients. Moreover, the patients showed decreased absolute counts of total CD45+ lymphocytes and total NK cells (both P < 0·001) and CD3+ and CD4+ T lymphocytes (both P = 0·001), but similar absolute counts of CD8+ T effector cells (P = 0·045) (Table 2). The data suggest that CD8+ T lymphocytes are decreased only marginally late post‐transplant in patients, whereas other T, B and NK cell subsets are reduced significantly compared to healthy individuals.
Compared to healthy controls, patients showed significantly decreased absolute counts of total CD4+CD25+FoxP3+CD127– Treg (P < 0·001), IFN‐γ–Helios+ P < 0·001), IFN‐γ–Helios– (P < 0·001) and IFN‐γ+Helios+ Treg (P = 0·007), whereas IFN‐γ+Helios– Treg were similar in patients and controls (P = 0·586). When additional subsets of CD4+CD25+FoxP3+CD127– Treg were analysed, patients showed lower CD183+CD62L+, CD183–CD62L+, CD252–CD152+, CD28+HLA‐DR–, CD28+HLA‐DR+, CD95+CD178– (all P < 0·001), CD152–CD154+ (P = 0·006), CD279+CD152+ (P < 0·001) and CD279–CD152+ Treg (P = 0·001) than healthy controls (Table 2). It appears that activated Treg with homing receptors for lymph nodes and receptors for B lymphocyte and DC interaction are reduced in patients, whereas other Treg subsets expressing IL‐10, TGF‐β, CD178, CD119, T‐bet, granzyme and/or perforin are present at similar levels as those found in healthy controls (P > 0·01) (Table 2).
Stability of lymphocyte and Treg subsets in patients
To study the stability of lymphocyte counts and Treg phenotypes, lymphocyte and Treg subsets were studied twice in 59 patients [interval first versus second investigation: 120 ± 47 days; mean ± standard deviation (s.d.)] and three times in 11 patients (interval second versus third investigation: 106 ± 19 days). Only CD95+CD178– (first versus second investigation: 2·6 ± 2·3/µl versus 1·9 ± 1·7/µl; P = 0·004; Wilcoxon's signed rank test) and perforin+granzyme B+ (second versus third investigation: 3·0 ± 5·3/µl versus 4·1 ± 6·7/µl; P = 0·008) absolute Treg numbers differed among the measurements (data not shown).
NK cells and time post‐transplant
When lymphocyte and Treg subsets in patients ≤ 1·5 versus > 1·5 years post‐transplant (n = 39 versus n = 97) were compared, only total NK cells were higher in patients > 1·5 years post‐transplant (124 ± 107/µl versus 181 ± 140/µl; P = 0·006; Mann–Whitney U‐test), whereas the other lymphocyte and Treg subsets were similar (data not shown). Patients ≤ 1·5 years post‐transplant were analysed after a mean follow‐up of 13 ± 3·1 months post‐transplant (range = 5–18 months) and patients >1·5 years post‐transplant after a follow‐up of 90 ± 83 months (range = 20–360 months) (Table 1).
Graft function and lymphocyte/Treg counts
Patients had a mean GFR of 48 ± 20 ml/min (± s.d.) and a mean serum creatinine of 1·7 ± 0·71 mg/dl. Both higher GFR and lower serum creatinine were associated with higher total NK and CD19+ B cells as well as higher IFN‐γ–Helios+, CD28+HLA‐DR+, CD252–CD152+ and CD183+CD62L+ Treg (all P < 0·01, Spearman's rank correlation test) (Table 3). GFR and serum creatinine were not associated with CD8+ lymphocyte counts (P = 0·147; P = 0·222).
Table 3.
Association of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) with lymphocyte and regulatory T cell (Treg) subsets in 136 transplant recipients
| GFR | Creatinine | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | P | r | P | r |
| Total NK/µl (CD16+/–56+/–) | 0·002 | 0·263 | 0·005 | −0·241 |
| CD19+/µl | < 0·001 | 0·349 | 0·001 | −0·281 |
| IFN‐γ–Helios+ Treg/µl | < 0·001 | 0·300 | < 0·001 | −0·305 |
| CD28+HLA‐DR+ Treg/µl | 0·005 | 0·242 | 0·004 | −0·249 |
| CD252–CD152+ Treg/µl | 0·007 | 0·233 | 0·004 | −0·246 |
| CD183+CD62L+ Treg/µl | < 0·001 | 0·305 | < 0·001 | −0·343 |
NK cells, CD8+ lymphocytes and total Tregs
High absolute numbers of total NK cells (P < 0·001) as well as high absolute counts of CD8+ lymphocytes (P = 0.011) were associated with CD4+CD25+CD127–FoxP3+ Treg counts (Table 4, Fig. 3). Healthy individuals lack this association. In backstep multivariate regression analysis with adjustment for the main variables CD8+ T lymphocytes and NK cells, in addition to CD19+ B and CD4+ T lymphocytes, we found that the positive association of NK cells with CD4+CD25+CD127–FoxP3+ Treg still existed (beta‐coefficient = 0·23, confidence interval (CI) = 0·07–0·4, P = 0·006), whereas the significant association between CD8+ T lymphocytes and Treg was not maintained.
Table 4.
Associations of lymphocyte and regulatory T cell (Treg) subsets in stable long‐term renal transplant recipients and healthy controls
| Healthy controls | Patients | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 52) | (n = 136) | |||||||
| CD8+/µl | Total NK/µl | CD8+/µl | Total NK/µl | |||||
| Subset/µl | r | P | r | P | r | P | r | P |
| CD45+ | 0·554 | < 0·001 | 0·433 | 0·001 | 0·749 | < 0·001 | 0·411 | < 0·001 |
| CD3+ | 0·624 | < 0·001 | 0·318 | 0·022 | 0·791 | < 0·001 | 0·223 | 0·009 |
| CD4+ | 0·167 | 0·235 | 0·253 | 0·070 | 0·483 | < 0·001 | 0·285 | 0·001 |
| CD8+ | 0·207 | 0·141 | 0·075 | 0·383 | ||||
| Total NK (CD16+/–CD56+/–) | 0·207 | 0·141 | 0·075 | 0·383 | ||||
| CD19+ | −0·025 | 0·859 | −0·035 | 0·804 | 0·403 | < 0·001 | 0·213 | 0·013 |
| Treg (CD4+CD25+CD127–FoxP3+) | −0·202 | 0·155 | −0·029 | 0·842 | 0·219 | 0·011 | 0·347 | < 0·001 |
| Helios+IFN‐γ– Treg | −0·249 | 0·078 | −0·096 | 0·503 | 0·065 | 0·453 | 0·339 | < 0·001 |
| Helios+IFN‐γ+ Treg | −0·198 | 0·164 | −0·184 | 0·197 | 0·014 | 0·870 | 0·033 | 0·703 |
| Helios–IFN‐γ+ Treg | −0·344 | 0·014 | −0·008 | 0·955 | −0·041 | 0·633 | 0·055 | 0·524 |
| IL‐10–TGF‐β+ Treg | −0·109 | 0·445 | −0·089 | 0·536 | 0·215 | 0·012 | 0·212 | 0·013 |
| CD183+CD62L– Treg | −0·110 | 0·440 | 0·172 | 0·226 | 0·181 | 0·036 | 0·254 | 0·003 |
| CD183+CD62L+ Treg | −0·115 | 0·422 | 0·107 | 0·456 | 0·164 | 0·057 | 0·295 | 0·001 |
| CD183–CD62L+ Treg | 0·019 | 0·893 | −0·037 | 0·794 | 0·188 | 0·029 | 0·263 | 0·002 |
| CD252+CD152– Treg | −0·193 | 0·174 | −0·225 | 0·112 | 0·053 | 0·542 | 0·068 | 0·433 |
| CD252+CD152+ Treg | −0·306 | 0·029 | −0·280 | 0·047 | 0·166 | 0·054 | 0·040 | 0·645 |
| CD252–CD152+ Treg | −0·224 | 0·114 | −0·006 | 0·969 | 0·134 | 0·123 | 0·421 | < 0·001 |
| Perforin+granzyme B– Treg | −0·030 | 0·836 | 0·116 | 0·419 | −0·053 | 0·543 | 0·073 | 0·399 |
| Perforin+granzyme B+ Treg | 0·054 | 0·707 | 0·175 | 0·219 | 0·383 | < 0·001 | −0·115 | 0·183 |
| Perforin– granzyme B+ Treg | 0·331 | 0·018 | −0·027 | 0·851 | 0·515 | < 0·001 | −0·186 | 0·031 |
| CD28+HLA‐DR– Treg | −0·095 | 0·508 | −0·095 | 0·508 | 0·181 | 0·036 | 0·270 | 0·002 |
| CD28+HLA‐DR+ Treg | −0·307 | 0·028 | −0·012 | 0·931 | 0·122 | 0·160 | 0·407 | < 0·001 |
| CD28–HLA‐DR+ Treg | 0·140 | 0·326 | 0·235 | 0·097 | 0·272 | 0·001 | 0·073 | 0·399 |
| CD95+CD178– Treg | −0·248 | 0·079 | −0·173 | 0·226 | 0·116 | 0·181 | 0·359 | < 0·001 |
| CD95+CD178+ Treg | −0·066 | 0·647 | 0·069 | 0·630 | 0·049 | 0·575 | 0·023 | 0·788 |
| CD95–CD178+ Treg | −0·121 | 0·397 | −0·134 | 0·349 | −0·284 | 0·001 | 0·008 | 0·926 |
| CD152+CD154– Treg | −0·044 | 0·757 | 0·148 | 0·299 | 0·019 | 0·829 | −0·006 | 0·943 |
| CD152+CD154+ Treg | 0·006 | 0·948 | −0·149 | 0·084 | ||||
| CD152–CD154+ Treg | 0·013 | 0·926 | −0·103 | 0·471 | −0·083 | 0·341 | 0·031 | 0·722 |
| CD119+T‐bet– Treg | −0·004 | 0·979 | 0·232 | 0·102 | 0·156 | 0·070 | 0·104 | 0·231 |
| CD119+T‐bet+ Treg | −0·071 | 0·619 | 0·054 | 0·705 | 0·052 | 0·553 | 0·144 | 0·097 |
| CD119–T‐bet+ Treg | 0·120 | 0·402 | −0·072 | 0·616 | 0·115 | 0·182 | −0·093 | 0·284 |
| CD279+CD152– Treg | −0·041 | 0·773 | −0·035 | 0·810 | −0·023 | 0·789 | −0·023 | 0·787 |
| CD279+CD152+ Treg | 0·027 | 0·853 | 0·359 | 0·010 | 0·112 | 0·197 | 0·148 | 0·087 |
| CD279–CD152+ Treg | −0·256 | 0·069 | −0·078 | 0·587 | 0·171 | 0·048 | 0·372 | < 0·001 |
Statistical analysis was performed using Spearman's rank correlation test. P‐values of <0·02 were marked by colours and correlations of CD8+/µl were indicated by orange and correlations of total natural killer (NK) cells/µl by yellow background. HLA‐DR = human leucocyte antigen D‐related; FoxP3 = forkhead box protein 3; IL= interleukin; IFN = interferon; TGF = transforming growth factor.
Figure 3.

Associations of total natural killer (NK) cell counts with graft outcome and regulatory T cell (Treg) subset counts in long‐term stable renal transplant recipients. Absolute counts of total NK cells were associated with glomerular filtration rate (r = 0·263; P = 0·002; Spearman's rank test) and serum creatinine (r = –0·241; P = 0·005) as well as absolute total Treg (r = 0·347; P < 0·001) and Helios+interferon (IFN)‐γ– Treg counts (r = 0·339; P < 0·001) in long‐term stable renal transplant recipients (n = 136).
NK cells, CD8+ lymphocytes and Helios+IFN‐γ– Tregs
Interestingly, absolute numbers of total NK cells were found to increase in association with Helios+IFN‐γ– Treg (P < 0·001), whereas CD8+ lymphocytes lacked this relationship with Helios+IFN‐γ– Treg (P = 0·453) (Fig. 3, Table 4). In backstep multivariate regression analysis with adjustment for CD8+ T lymphocytes and NK cells as the main variables, in addition to CD19+ B and CD4+ T lymphocytes, we found that the positive association of NK cells with Helios+IFN‐γ– Treg still existed (beta‐coefficient = 0·38, CI = 0·18–0·6, P < 0·001).
NK cells, CD8+ lymphocytes and additional Treg subsets
Total NK cells were associated with CD4+CD25+CD127–FoxP3+ Treg that co‐express the phenotypes IL‐10–TGF‐β+ (P = 0·013), CD183+CD62L– (P = 0·003), CD183+CD62L+ (P = 0·001), CD183–CD62L+ (P = 0·002), CD252–CD152+ (P < 0·001), CD28+HLA‐DR– (P = 0·002), CD28+HLA‐DR+ (P < 0·001), CD95+CD178– (P < 0·001) and CD279–CD152+ (P < 0·001) (Table 4). In backstep multivariate regression analyses with adjustment for the variables CD8+ T lymphocytes and NK cells as the main variables, in addition to CD19+ B and CD4+ T lymphocytes, we found that the positive association of NK cells with only CD183+CD62L– (beta‐coefficient = 0·38, P < 0·001), CD252–CD152+ (beta‐coefficient = 0·56, P < 0·001), CD28+HLA‐DR+ (beta‐coefficient = 0·28, P = 0·011), CD95+CD178– (beta‐coefficient = 0·27, P = 0·002) and CD279–CD152+ Treg (beta‐coefficient = 0·27, P = 0·002) still existed.
Notably, absolute numbers of CD8+ T lymphocytes were associated with perforin+granzyme B+ (P < 0·001), perforin–granzyme B+ (P < 0·001), CD95–CD178+ (P = 0·001) and CD28–HLA‐DR+ (P = 0·001) Treg, whereas total NK cells did not show these associations (P = 0·183; P = 0·031; P = 0·926; and P = 0·399, respectively) (Table 4). In backstep multivariate regression analysis with adjustment for the variables NK, CD19+ B and CD4+ T lymphocytes, we found that the positive association of CD8+ T lymphocytes with perforin–granzyme B+ Treg remained significant (beta‐coefficient = 0·91, P < 0·001).
Healthy controls showed an association of absolute NK cell counts only with CD279+CD152+ Treg (P = 0·010) (Table 4). In healthy individuals, high CD8+ lymphocytes were associated with low Helios–IFN‐γ+ (P = 0·014) and high perforin–granzyme B+ (P = 0·018) Treg.
NK cells, CD8+ lymphocytes and lymphocyte subsets
Interestingly, an association of CD8+ lymphocytes as well as total NK cells with CD19+ B lymphocytes was only found in patients (P < 0·001; P = 0·013) and so was an association with CD4+ T lymphocyte counts (P < 0·001; P = 0·001, respectively). In backstep multivariate regression analysis with adjustment for the variables NK, Treg and CD4+ T lymphocytes, we found that the significant positive association of CD8+ T lymphocytes or NK cells with CD19+ B lymphocytes was not maintained. Conversely, the significant association of CD4+ T lymphocytes with CD8+ T lymphocytes remained significant in multivariate analysis (beta‐coefficient = 0·33, P < 0·001). In healthy individuals these associations were absent (P = 0·859; P = 0·804; P = 0·235; and P = 0·070, respectively) (Table 4). The data suggest that CD8+ T lymphocyte counts are associated independently with CD4+ T lymphocyte counts in immunosuppressed patients with well‐functioning grafts.
Immunosuppressive protocol and lymphocyte/Treg counts
We studied whether treatment with certain immunosuppressive drugs was associated with certain lymphocyte and Treg counts. Patients with higher daily steroid doses also received higher azathioprine doses (r = 0·806, P = 0·009; Spearman's rank correlation test), and patients with higher tacrolimus doses tended to receive, in addition, higher mycophenolate doses (r = 0·343, P = 0·003). Interestingly, steroids (n = 82), cyclosporin (n = 20), tacrolimus (n = 104) and mycophenolate mofetil (n = 91) doses did not show significant associations with absolute numbers of T and B lymphocytes, NK cells or Treg subsets. In contrast, high azathioprine doses were associated with low absolute counts of total NK cells (n = 15; r = –0·775, P < 0·001). Interestingly, when patients with or without steroid therapy were compared, patients on steroids had higher CD28+HLA‐DR– (P = 0·005) and lower CD28–HLA‐DR+ (P = 0·002) and CD279+CD152– Treg (P = 0·008) counts than steroid‐free patients (n = 49)· The other cell subsets were similar in patients on steroid‐containing or steroid‐free immunosuppressive maintenance. Blood levels of cyclosporin (n = 20 patients), tacrolimus (n = 104) and mycophenolate mofetil (n = 44) were not associated significantly with lymphocyte and Treg subset counts.
Immunosuppressive protocol and GFR
There was no association of GFR with daily oral drug dose or blood level of immunosuppressive drugs.
Immunosuppressive drugs, lymphocyte and Treg subsets and time post‐transplant
Daily mycophenolate mofetil (r = –0·319; P = 0·002; Spearman's rank correlation test) and tacrolimus doses (r = –0·290; P = 0·003) as well as mycophenolate blood levels (r = –0·486; P = 0·001) were decreased with time post‐transplant, and CD28–HLA‐DR+ Treg counts (r = 0·300; P < 0·001) increased simultaneously.
Rejection and lymphocyte/Treg subsets
Ninety‐three patients never experienced rejection, nine had experienced a rejection Banff grade > 1 prior to testing, and 16 had experienced previous borderline rejection. All rejections were reversed and all patients had well‐functioning kidney grafts at the time of testing. Lymphocyte and Treg subsets were not significantly different in the three patient groups.
Infection and lymphocyte/Treg subsets
Patients were free of acute infection at the time of testing. Six patients had experienced viral infections and 25 bacterial infections more than 3 months prior to testing. Previous viral infection was not associated with lymphocyte and Treg subsets (P > 0·01; Mann–Whitney U‐test), whereas previous bacterial infection was associated with increased IL‐10+TGF‐β+ Treg (P < 0·001).
Discussion
In the present study, we investigated whether there is an association of NK cells with Treg subsets in peripheral blood in kidney recipients with good long‐term allograft outcome. Peripheral blood levels of total NK cells included CD16+CD56+, CD16–CD56+ and CD16+CD56– subpopulations of NK cells. Our data suggest that NK cell counts increase with time post‐transplant in patients with good graft outcome. When lymphocyte and Treg subsets in patients ≤ 1·5 versus > 1·5 years post‐transplant were compared, only total NK cells were higher in patients > 1·5 years post‐transplant, whereas the other lymphocyte and Treg subsets were similar. The long‐term NK cell increase was associated neither with daily doses of immunosuppressive drugs or blood levels of immunosuppressants nor with the occurrence of acute infection or rejection. We found evidence to suggest that NK cell counts increase independently in parallel with Treg counts, particularly Helios+IFN‐γ– thymus‐derived tTreg. This particular Treg subset co‐expresses the activation marker HLA‐DR and appears to affect effector cells functionally by release of TGF‐β or via CTLA‐4‐mediated cell interaction with DC in lymph nodes. These associations were observed in transplant patients, but not in healthy individuals. We therefore speculate that whereas healthy controls have stable NK cells counts, NK cell and Treg counts increase with time post‐transplant in patients with good graft function and direct or indirect (via DC) interaction of these cell subsets may prevent graft damage by the innate immune system. The stimulus for the NK cell increase remains unknown. Interestingly, CD8+ lymphocytes did not show a similar increase post‐transplant; these cells were associated strongly with activated HLA‐DR expressing Treg that co‐express apoptosis‐inducing substances and determinants such as perforin, granzyme B and Fas ligand. One might speculate that graft‐specific CD8+ lymphocytes were killed by cytotoxic Treg, thereby preventing increases of CD8+ effector cells and keeping post‐transplant CD8+ lymphocyte counts at a stable level. Stable levels of CD8+ effector cells were observed together with a lack of association of CD8+ lymphocytes with graft function, such as GFR and serum creatinine. Both these indicators of graft function were associated with NK cell counts; namely, high NK cells post‐transplant were associated with increased GFR and decreased serum creatinine. In other words, the data show that high NK cells are not harmful for the graft and instead are associated with good long‐term graft function. Because of the association of NK cell and Treg counts we speculate that high NK cells may play a causative role in relation to high Treg counts, and that Treg may inhibit NK cell function via an as yet‐unknown pathway. Several pathways of NK cell inhibition have been described in animal and cell culture experiments and in clinical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and these observations are compatible with our findings in renal transplant recipients.
TGF‐β‐mediated suppression of NK cell function by Treg has been observed in mice by Barao et al. 41, who demonstrated that the prior removal of host Treg cells, but not CD8+ T cells, enhanced NK cell‐mediated bone marrow rejection significantly. The inhibitory role of Treg on NK cells was confirmed in vivo with adoptive transfer studies in which transferred CD4+CD25+ cells could abrogate NK cell‐mediated hybrid resistance. Anti‐TGF‐β monoclonal antibody treatment also increased NK cell‐mediated bone marrow graft rejection, suggesting that the NK cell suppression was mediated by TGF‐β. The authors concluded that CD4+CD25+ Treg cells can inhibit NK cell function in vivo potently, and that their depletion may have therapeutic ramifications for NK cell function in bone marrow transplantation and cancer therapy 41. TGF‐β‐dependent inhibition of NK cells by Treg was also described by Ghiringhelli 42. Zhou et al. observed that in‐vitro‐induced Treg cells decreased NK cell cytotoxicity and down‐regulated dramatically the IFN‐γ secretion of NK cells responding to IL‐12 stimulation 43. Moreover, it was found that cell–cell interaction was essential for suppression of NK cell function, and that TGF‐β played a vital role in the inhibition process. These results suggest that FoxP3 expression in polyclonal CD4+ T cells can induce Treg cells and potentially inhibit NK cell function 43. Our finding of a strong association of TGF‐β‐producing Treg with NK cell numbers suggests that Treg might inhibit NK cells in renal transplant recipients directly by release of TGF‐β.
Others reported that NK T cells promoted changes in expression of negative co‐stimulatory receptors and anti‐inflammatory cytokines by Treg and other T cell subsets in an IL‐4‐dependent manner, an effect that resulted in tolerance to bone marrow and organ grafts in animals 44. Additionally, NK cells are involved both in rejection and tolerance of solid allografts, as reviewed by Benichou et al. 45. Allo‐NKs were reported to be capable of inducing systemic tolerance after haplo‐ haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) by assembling donor‐derived immature DCs to expand recipient‐derived Treg cells in the thymus 46. Our finding of a strong association of CD152+ Treg with NK cell numbers in renal transplant recipients suggests that Treg might inhibit NK cells via negative signalling to DC that (a) might inhibit NK cells by release of immunosuppressive cytokines or negative signals during cell–cell contact, or (b) might induce further Treg.
In kidney transplant patients, down‐modulation of CD16 and CD6 on CD56(dim) NK cells was observed, with significant differences between cyclosporin A‐ and tacrolimus‐treated patients 47. Tacrolimus treatment was associated with decreased CD69, HLA‐DR and increased CD94/NKG2A expression in CD56(dim) NK cells, indicating that the quality of immunosuppressive treatment impinges upon the peripheral NK cell repertoire. In‐vitro studies with peripheral blood mononuclear cells of healthy donors showed that this modulation of CD16, CD6, CD69 and HLA‐DR could also be induced experimentally. The presence of calcineurin or mTOR inhibitors had also functional consequences regarding degranulation and IFN‐γ production against K562 target cells, respectively 47. Furthermore, Bergmann et al. concluded from in‐vitro experiments that human tumour iTreg cells inhibited IL‐2‐mediated NK cell activity in the absence of target cells, whereas, surprisingly, the tumoricidal activity of NK cells was enhanced by iTreg cells 48. Gasteiger et al. reported that CD127+ NK cells expanded in an IL‐2‐dependent manner upon Treg cell depletion and were able to give rise to mature NK cells, indicating that the latter can develop through a CD25+ intermediate stage 49. Thus, Treg cells restrain the IL‐2‐dependent CD4+ T cell help for CD127+ immature NK cells. These findings highlight the adaptive control of innate lymphocyte homeostasis 49. The same authors reported that IL‐2 rapidly boosted the capacity of NK cells to engage target cells productively and enabled NK cell responses to weak stimulation 50. The results suggest that IL‐2‐dependent adaptive‐innate lymphocyte cross‐talk tunes NK cell reactivity and that Treg cells restrain NK cell cytotoxicity by limiting the availability of IL‐2 50. The IL‐2 dependence of Treg/NK cell interaction was confirmed in a murine diabetes model. Results from gene signature analyses, quantification of signal tranducer and activator of transcription (STAT)−5 phosphorylation levels, cytokine neutralization experiments, cytokine supplementation studies and evaluations of intracellular cytokine levels argue collectively for a scenario in which Treg regulate NK cell functions by controlling the bioavailability of limiting amounts of IL‐2 in the islets, generated mainly by infiltrating CD4+ T cells 51. Moreover, Jukes et al. reported that iNK T cells are not activated by allogeneic cells per se, but expand, both in‐vitro and in‐vivo, in the presence of a concomitant conventional T cell response to alloantigen that is triggered by IL‐2 13. Our finding of an association of DR+Helios IFN‐γ– Treg with NK cell numbers suggests that most of the Treg might have stable FoxP3 expression, originate from the thymus and therefore do not produce IL‐2 by themselves, and that these DR+ Treg are activated and consume IL‐2, resulting in IL‐2‐dependent inhibition of NK cells. Immunosuppressive drugs such as cyclosporin and tacrolimus that inhibit IL‐2 production in lymphocytes can therefore contribute indirectly to NK cell suppression in renal transplant recipients.
In general, the cited experiments in animals and cell cultures as well as the observations in clinical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation suggest that Treg interact directly or via DC with NK cells, with the potential to down‐regulate cytotoxic or to enhance immunoregulatory NK cell function. These observations agree with our finding that high NK cell counts are associated with high CD152+ Treg that might transform immunostimulatory DC to immunosuppressive NK cell‐inhibiting DC. TGF‐β‐producing Treg might suppress NK cells directly. Strongly activated thymical‐derived Treg might inhibit NK cells by IL‐2 consumption. Our data suggest that NK cells might interact with Treg in lymph nodes.
Moreover, we speculate that renal transplant recipients > 1·5 years post‐transplant develop an immunoregulatory NK cell type with diminished natural cytotoxicity and little IFN‐γ production upon monokine stimulation 52, similar to those immunoregulatory NK cells in the uterus that protect pregnancy 4, 53. Immunoregulatory NK cells (NKreg) have been demonstrated in vitro 54, 55, and these NKreg were able to suppress T cell responses antigen‐specifically in cell culture experiments 55. The hypothesis that late post‐transplant NKreg in combination with Treg and Breg are generated is in line with our finding of high NK, B and Treg cells in patients with good long‐term graft function and low immunosuppression, and is supported by reports of high NK, B and Treg cells in tolerant kidney and liver transplant recipients 9, 10, 56, 57. Our data suggest that induction of NK, B and Treg cells is a phenomenon late post‐transplant that is associated with good long‐term graft outcome and could be interpreted as an induction of NK, B and T lymphocytes with immunoregulatory function that might inhibit NK, B and T lymphocytes with effector function against the graft.
Conclusions
The higher numbers of peripheral NK cells late post‐transplant compared to early post‐transplant, the strong association of NK cells with Treg and the strong association of graft function with high NK, Treg and B cell counts in kidney recipients with good long‐term graft function suggest an interaction of these cell subpopulations that contributes to good long‐term allograft acceptance. Further in‐vitro studies are required to illuminate the mechanisms of NK/B/Treg cell interaction in this particular patient cohort.
Limitations of the study
We studied only statistical associations showing good stable long‐term graft function in patients with high NK, B and Treg cells. Further studies investigating phenotype and in‐vitro function of these lymphocyte subsets will clarify whether subsets with an immunoregulatory phenotype are induced, whether these subsets are able to interact with each other and whether they inhibit graft‐reactive effector cells.
Author contributions
V. D. designed the study and wrote the manuscript. G. O. made substantial contributions to conception and design as well as analysis and interpretation of data. K. T., L. Z., M. A., R. W., N. B. and C. M. have been involved in drafting the manuscript and revising it critically for important intellectual content. K. T. and M. A. were also involved in compilation and statistical analysis of the data. R. W., N. B. and C. M. treated the patients. All authors have given final approval of the version to be published.
Disclosure
The authors declare that they have no disclosures.
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge the skilful technical assistance of Marion Miltz‐Savidis, Silja Petersen‐Novag, Martina Kutsche‐Bauer, Regina Seemuth and Anja Brüchig.
References
- 1. van der Touw W, Bromberg JS. Natural killer cells and the immune response in solid organ transplantation. Am J Transplant 2010; 10:1354–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Verneris MR. Natural killer cells and regulatory T cells: how to manipulate a graft for optimal GVL. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Prog 2013; 2013:335–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Seillet C, Belz GT, Huntington ND. Development, homeostasis, and heterogeneity of NK cells and ILC1. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2015; 395:37–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Zhang J, Dunk C, Croy AB, Lye SJ. To serve and to protect: the role of decidual innate immune cells on human pregnancy. Cell Tissue Res 2016; 363:249–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Dos Santos DC, Campos EF, Saraiva Camara NO, David DS, Avancini Costa Malheiros DM. Compartment‐specific expression of natural killer cell markers in renal transplantation: immune profile in acute rejection. Transpl Int 2015; 29:443–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Bulmer JN, Lash GE. The role of uterine NK cells in normal reproduction and reproductive disorders. Adv Exp Med Biol 2015; 868:95–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Saito S, Shiozaki A, Sasaki Y, Nakashima A, Shima T, Ito M. Regulatory T cells and regulatory natural killer (NK) cells play important roles in feto–maternal tolerance. Semin Immunopathol 2007; 29:115–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Saito S, Nakashima A, Myojo‐Higuma S, Shiozaki A. The balance between cytotoxic NK cells and regulatory NK cells in human pregnancy. J Reprod Immunol 2008; 77:14–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Newell KA, Turka LA. Tolerance signatures in transplant recipients. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2015; 20:400–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Sagoo P, Perucha E, Sawitzki B et al Development of a cross‐platform biomarker signature to detect renal transplant tolerance in humans. J Clin Invest 2010; 120:1848–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Ralainirina N, Poli A, Michel T et al Control of NK cell functions by CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. J Leukoc Biol 2007; 81:144–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Romagnani C, Della Chiesa M, Kohler S et al Activation of human NK cells by plasmacytoid dendritic cells and its modulation by CD4+ T helper cells and CD4+ CD25hi T regulatory cells. Eur J Immunol 2005; 35:2452–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Jukes JP, Wood KJ, Jones ND. Bystander activation of iNKT cells occurs during conventional T‐cell alloresponses. Am J Transplant 2012; 12:590–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Zecher D, Li Q, Oberbarnscheidt MH et al NK cells delay allograft rejection in lymphopenic hosts by downregulating the homeostatic proliferation of CD8+ T cells. J Immunol 2010; 184:6649–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Baron M, Belo R, Cathelin D et al Innate‐like and conventional T cell populations from hemodialyzed and kidney transplanted patients are equally compromised. PLOS ONE 2014; 9:e105422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Pedroza‐Pacheco I, Madrigal A, Saudemont A. Interaction between natural killer cells and regulatory T cells: perspectives for immunotherapy. Cell Mol Immunol 2013; 10:222–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Daniel V, Sadeghi M, Wang H, Opelz G. CD4+CD25+Foxp3+IFN‐gamma+ human induced T regulatory cells are induced by interferon‐gamma and suppress alloresponses nonspecifically. Hum Immunol 2011; 72:699–707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Daniel V, Naujokat C, Sadeghi M et al Observational support for an immunoregulatory role of CD3+CD4+CD25+IFN‐gamma+ blood lymphocytes in kidney transplant recipients with good long‐term graft outcome. Transpl Int 2008; 21:646–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Daniel V, Wang H, Sadeghi M, Opelz G. Interferon‐gamma producing regulatory T cells as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool in organ transplantation. Int Rev Immunol 2014; 33:195–211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Daniel V, Trojan K, Opelz G. Immunosuppressive drugs affect induction of IFNγ+ Treg in vitro . Hum Immunol 2016; 77:146–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Daniel V, Trojan K, Adamek M, Opelz G. IFNgamma+ Treg in‐vivo and in‐vitro represent both activated nTreg and peripherally induced aTreg and remain phenotypically stable in‐vitro after removal of the stimulus. BMC Immunol 2015; 16:45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Amsen D, Spilianakis CG, Flavell RA. How are T(H)1 and T(H)2 effector cells made? Curr Opin Immunol 2009; 21:153–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Getnet D, Grosso JF, Goldberg MV et al A role for the transcription factor Helios in human CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells. Mol Immunol 2010; 47:1595–600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Sebastian M, Lopez‐Ocasio M, Metidji A, Rieder SA, Shevach EM, Thornton AM. Helios controls a limited subset of regulatory T cell functions. J Immunol 2016; 196:144–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Grzanka J, Leveson‐Gower D, Golab K et al FoxP3, Helios, and SATB1: roles and relationships in regulatory T cells. Int Immunopharmacol 2013; 16:343–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Zabransky DJ, Nirschl CJ, Durham NM et al Phenotypic and functional properties of Helios+ regulatory T cells. PLOS ONE 2012; 7:e34547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Elkord E, Abd Al Samid M, Chaudhary B. Helios, and not FoxP3, is the marker of activated Tregs expressing GARP/LAP. Oncotarget 2015; 6:20026–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Elkord E. Helios should not be cited as a marker of human thymus‐derived Tregs. Commentary: Helios(+) and Helios(–) cells coexist within the natural FOXP3(+) T regulatory cell subset in humans. Front Immunol 2016; 7:276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Kim HJ, Barnitz RA, Kreslavsky T et al Stable inhibitory activity of regulatory T cells requires the transcription factor Helios. Science 2015; 350:334–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Baine I, Basu S, Ames R, Sellers RS, Macian F. Helios induces epigenetic silencing of IL2 gene expression in regulatory T cells. J Immunol 2013; 190:1008–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Thornton AM, Korty PE, Tran DQ et al Expression of Helios, an Ikaros transcription factor family member, differentiates thymic‐derived from peripherally induced Foxp3+ T regulatory cells. J Immunol 2010; 184:3433–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Himmel ME, MacDonald KG, Garcia RV, Steiner TS, Levings MK. Helios+ and Helios– cells coexist within the natural FOXP3+ T regulatory cell subset in humans. J Immunol 2013; 190:2001–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Gottschalk RA, Corse E, Allison JP. Expression of Helios in peripherally induced Foxp3+ regulatory T cells. J Immunol 2012; 188:976–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Akimova T, Beier UH, Wang L, Levine MH, Hancock WW. Helios expression is a marker of T cell activation and proliferation. PLOS ONE 2011; 6:e24226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Mellor AL, Munn DH. Physiologic control of the functional status of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells. J Immunol 2011; 186:4535–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. McClymont SA, Putnam AL, Lee MR et al Plasticity of human regulatory T cells in healthy subjects and patients with type 1 diabetes. J Immunol 2011; 186:3918–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Daniel V, Sadeghi M, Wang H, Opelz G. CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+)IFNgamma(+)CD178(+) human induced Treg (iTreg) contribute to suppression of alloresponses by apoptosis of responder cells. Hum Immunol 2013; 74:151–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Koch MA, Tucker‐Heard G, Perdue NR, Killebrew JR, Urdahl KB, Campbell DJ. The transcription factor T‐bet controls regulatory T cell homeostasis and function during type 1 inflammation. Nat Immunol 2009; 10:595–602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Koch MA, Thomas KR, Perdue NR, Smigiel KS, Srivastava S, Campbell DJ. T‐bet(+) Treg cells undergo abortive Th1 cell differentiation due to impaired expression of IL‐12 receptor beta2. Immunity 2012; 37:501–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Sakaguchi S, Miyara M, Costantino CM, Hafler DA. FOXP3+ regulatory T cells in the human immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 2010; 10:490–500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Barao I, Hanash AM, Hallett W et al Suppression of natural killer cell‐mediated bone marrow cell rejection by CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:5460–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Ghiringhelli F, Menard C, Terme M et al CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells inhibit natural killer cell functions in a transforming growth factor‐beta‐dependent manner. J Exp Med 2005; 202:1075–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Zhou H, Chen L, You Y, Zou L, Zou P. Foxp3‐transduced polyclonal regulatory T cells suppress NK cell functions in a TGF‐beta dependent manner. Autoimmunity 2010; 43:299–307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Hongo D, Tang X, Dutt S, Nador RG, Strober S. Interactions between NKT cells and Tregs are required for tolerance to combined bone marrow and organ transplants. Blood 2012; 119:1581–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Benichou G, Yamada Y, Aoyama A, Madsen JC. Natural killer cells in rejection and tolerance of solid organ allografts. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2011; 16:47–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Yu J, Ren X, Yan F et al Alloreactive natural killer cells promote haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation by expansion of recipient‐derived CD4(+) CD25(+) regulatory T cells. Transplant Int 2011; 24:201–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Neudoerfl C, Mueller BJ, Blume C et al The peripheral NK cell repertoire after kidney transplantation is modulated by different immunosuppressive drugs. Front Immunol 2013; 4:46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Bergmann C, Wild CA, Narwan M, Lotfi R, Lang S, Brandau S. Human tumor‐induced and naturally occurring Treg cells differentially affect NK cells activated by either IL‐2 or target cells. Eur J Immunol 2011; 41:3564–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Gasteiger G, Hemmers S, Bos PD, Sun JC, Rudensky AY. IL‐2‐dependent adaptive control of NK cell homeostasis. J Exp Med 2013; 210:1179–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Gasteiger G, Hemmers S, Firth MA et al IL‐2‐dependent tuning of NK cell sensitivity for target cells is controlled by regulatory T cells. J Exp Med 2013; 210:1167–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Sitrin J, Ring A, Garcia KC, Benoist C, Mathis D. Regulatory T cells control NK cells in an insulitic lesion by depriving them of IL‐2. J Exp Med 2013; 210:1153–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Melsen JE, Lugthart G, Lankester AC, Schilham MW. Human circulating and tissue‐resident CD56(bright) natural killer cell populations. Front Immunol 2016; 7:262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Mori M, Bogdan A, Balassa T, Csabai T, Szekeres‐Bartho J. The decidua – the maternal bed embracing the embryo‐maintains the pregnancy. Semin Immunopathol 2016; 38:635–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Giuliani M, Giron‐Michel J, Negrini S et al Generation of a novel regulatory NK cell subset from peripheral blood CD34+ progenitors promoted by membrane‐bound IL‐15. PLOS ONE 2008; 3:e2241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Deniz G, Erten G, Kucuksezer UC et al Regulatory NK cells suppress antigen‐specific T cell responses. J Immunol 2008; 180:850–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Newell KA, Asare A, Sanz I et al Longitudinal studies of a B cell‐derived signature of tolerance in renal transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 2015; 15:2908–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Chesneau M, Michel L, Dugast E et al Tolerant kidney transplant patients produce B cells with regulatory properties. J Am Soc Nephrol 2015; 26:2588–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
