Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Plant Science logoLink to Frontiers in Plant Science
. 2017 May 11;8:711. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00711

Agronomic Trait Variations and Ploidy Differentiation of Kiwiberries in Northwest China: Implication for Breeding

Ying Zhang 1, Caihong Zhong 2, Yifei Liu 3, Qiong Zhang 2, Xiaorong Sun 4, Dawei Li 2,*
PMCID: PMC5426280  PMID: 28553297

Abstract

Polyploid plants often have higher biomass and superior crop qualities. Breeders therefore search for crop germplasm with higher ploidy levels; however, whether higher ploidy levels are associated with better performance remains unclear. Actinidia arguta and related species, whose commercialized fruit are referred to as kiwiberries, harbor a series of ploidy races in nature, offering an opportunity to determine the link between ploidy levels and agronomic traits. In the present study, we determined the ploidy levels of A. arguta var. arguta, A. arguta var. giraldii, and A. melanandra in 16 natural populations using flow cytometry, and examined 31 trait variations in fruits, leaves and flowers by field observations, microscopic examination and laboratory analyses. Our results showed that octaploid and decaploid A. arguta var. giraldii had larger dimension of leaves than tetraploid A. arguta var. arguta and A. melanandra, but their fruits were significantly smaller. In addition, A. arguta var. giraldii (8x and 10x) had higher contents of nutrients such as ascorbic acid and amino acids; however, some important agronomic traits, including the content of total sugar and total acid, were significantly lower in the octaploids and decaploids. Moreover, octaploids and decaploids did not result in greater ecological adaptability for the challenging environments and climates. In conclusion, the differentiation of ecological adaptability and traits among natural kiwiberries' cytotypes suggested that higher ploidy levels are not inevitably advantageous in plants. The findings of A. arguta and related taxa in geographical distribution and agronomic trait variations will facilitate their germplasm domestication.

Keywords: Actinidia arguta, kiwiberries, sympatric area, ploidy levels, morphological variation, fruit characters, taxonomy, breeding

Introduction

Polyploidy, or whole genome duplication, has been an important feature of evolution and diversification in flowering plants (Otto and Whitton, 2000). Recent analysis basing on genomic data inferred all extant angiosperms have descended from polyploid species and undergone one or more chromosomal duplication events (Soltis et al., 2009). Plant polyploidization, is not the sum of parental genotypes (Adams and Wendel, 2005) but rather represents rapid and substantial genome reorganization, gene fractionation, transcriptomic and epigenetic alterations, and sub- and neofunctionalization of duplicate genes (Renny-Byfield and Wendel, 2014). The genomic changes subsequently altered plant physiology, morphology, phenology, and/or ecology within only one or a few generations (Levin, 2002), in particular, improved agronomical traits in some polyploid crops (Dubcovsky and Dvorak, 2007; Leitch and Leitch, 2008).

The connections between ploidy and agronomical traits in crops, however, are more complicated than breeders thought. Polyploidization provide de facto evidence for crop improvement, for example, enhanced cold adaptability in wild tetraploid potatoes (Hijmans et al., 2007) and increased vigor or higher biomass in polyploid cotton (Wendel and Cronn, 2003), rice (Cheng et al., 2007), wheat (Uddin et al., 1992), and maize (Crow, 1998; Duvick, 2001). Other changes in crop quality, such as doubling the amount of soluble proteins in Panicum virgatum (Warner et al., 1987), increased amino acid content in sorghum (Luo et al., 1992), improved fruit quality in tomato (Kagan-Zur et al., 1991) and higher secondary metabolite levels in Cymbopogon (Lavania et al., 2012), have also been observed. But there are also several disadvantages of polyploidy, including the disrupting effects of nuclear and cell enlargement and the propensity of polyploid mitosis and meiosis to produce aneuploid cells and epigenetic instability, resulting in transgressive (non-additive) gene regulation (Comai, 2005). Similarly, the elevated ploidy level does not consistently increase body size (Lavania, 2013). Even in grain crops, induced autopolyploid significantly increases seed size, but this advantage is offset by the reduction in overall seed set (Dhawan and Lavania, 1996). Basing on the comparison between diploid and its progenies, increasing evidences fuelled speculations that genome duplications may lead to the “dead-ends” (Wagner, 1970). Here, we want to ask more: do organisms with higher ploidy levels or multi-polyploidization (e.g., octoploid or decaploid) really perform better than their ancestors; namely, “the more (chromosome), the better?”

An effective way to evaluate the connections between ploidy level and ecological adaption might be focused on naturally existing that contains a mix of cytotypes. Cytogeographical investigations, particularly in sympatric areas containing different species, have provided valuable information to interpret the ecological adaption and evolutionary patterns (e.g., mating, competition) of different cytotypes (Soltis et al., 2010; King et al., 2012; Sonnleitner et al., 2016). Kiwiberries (sometimes called baby kiwi or hardy kiwifruit), the fruit of Actinidia. arguta (Sieb. and Zucc.) Planch. ex Miq. and the related species, A. melanandra Franch. and A. hypoleuca Nakai, are widely distributed in Asia and particularly diverse in ploidy levels (2x, 4x, 6x, 8x, etc.) (Ferguson and Seal, 2008). Actinidia. arguta var. arguta is distributed throughout eastern Siberia, Korea, Japan, and much of China (Li J. et al., 2007), the closely related A. hypoleuca is native to Japan, and A. arguta var. giraldii (Diels) Vorosh. and A. melanandra are unique to China. In Japan, hexaploid and heptaploid A. arguta var. arguta are found in northern, deep-snow regions and diploid A. hypoleuca in warm Pacific hill areas, whereas tetraploid plants of A. arguta var. arguta are widely distributed throughout Japan (Kataoka et al., 2010; Asakura and Hoshino, 2016), indicating potential ecological sorting among the ploidy races of A. arguta var. arguta and A. hypoleuca. Furthermore, complex ploidy variation (4x, 6x, 8x, and 10x) was detected in a population of A. arguta var. arguta in northwest China (Li et al., 2013). However, studies of other taxa, such as A. melanandra and A. arguta var. giraldii, are lacking. In particular, the ecological adaptation and mechanisms (e.g., niche separation or reproductive isolation, Fowler and Levin, 1984; Van Dijk and Bijlsma, 1994; Suda et al., 2007; Sonnleitner et al., 2016) responsible for the spatial separation or co-existence of these taxa remain far from explicit.

Breeding to take advantage of the diversity of Actinidia taxa is a pivotal strategy to broaden the genetic basis of present kiwifruit cultivars (Ferguson, 2007; Ferguson and Huang, 2007; Datson and Ferguson, 2011). The 54 species of Actinidia (Li J. et al., 2007; Li X. et al., 2007) characterizing by complex ploidy variation (Ferguson and Huang, 2007), are particularly diverse in fruit characteristics, such as size, shape, skin hairiness, flesh color, flavor, nutrient content, time of maturation, and storage life (Ferguson and Seal, 2008). Kiwiberries appear to be the most promising for further commercialization of kiwifruit (Boyd et al., 2002) because their fruit have edible skins, colorful flesh, good flavor, and functional health components (Matich et al., 2003; Nishiyama et al., 2005, 2008). Except for some elite breeding programmes (Boyd et al., 2002; Bieniek, 2012), there have been few studies concerning the morphological characteristics, fruit quality and sensory analyses of natural resources to explore new fruit characteristics for further breeding. In particular, it is not known whether the biological features, including fruit size, quality, or disease resistance, of some genotypes with higher ploidy levels, such as octaploids and decaploids, might be enhanced as a result of polyploid advantage (Adams and Wendel, 2005; Udall and Wendel, 2006). For example, an autotetraploid of A. chinensis var. chinensis, derived from chromosome doubling, had significantly larger fruit than its diploid parent (Wu et al., 2012, 2013), and hexaploids [Actinidia chinensis var. deliciosa (A. Chev.) A. Chev.] are more resistant to Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae than diploids (A. chinensis var. chinensis) (Datson et al., 2013).

Actinidia arguta and related species, whose have considerable commercial potential, harbor abundant ploidy and morphological variation in nature, providing the opportunity to better understand the relationship between ploidy levels and adaptability or agronomic traits. In this study, we conducted a series of morphometric and cytological investigations on sympatric populations of A. arguta var. arguta, A. arguta var. giraldii, and A. melanandra to assess (1) ploidy variation, distribution patterns, and potential co-existence mechanisms; (2) morphological characteristics, fruit quality, and relationships with ploidy levels. Specifically, we discuss the classification and germplasm utilization (e.g., superior germplasm having fruit with higher nutritional advantages or red or purple flesh) of these taxa for future breeding.

Materials and methods

Study site and sample investigation

The Qinling Mountain in China is the main sympatric areas of natural kiwiberries populations, including A. arguta var. arguta, A. arguta var. giraldii, and A. melanandra (Figure 1A). From 2010 to 2015, we collected 16 natural populations across a 700-km region of the Qinling Mountain (33°21′18.42″–34°40′2.9844.138 N and 105°44′6.32″–111°41′46.86″ E; Figure 1B, Table 1). In total, 119 plants with 64 A. arguta var. arguta, 28 A. arguta var. giraldii, and 27 A. melanandra were systematically investigated over the 5-year period. To better understand the ecological adaptability of kiwiberries, the climate and environmental data were collected and analyzed from each sample site. The altitude, latitude and longitude were recorded by GPS; and the climate data (30 years, 1980–2010) were obtained from China Meteorological Data Service Centre (http://data.cma.cn/) or Local Meteorological Bureau. Here, we calculate the mean value of 30 years climate data as follows: annual cumulative sunshine hours, extreme maximum and minimum temperature, and monthly maximum and minimum temperature, humidity and precipitation.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(A) Overall geographic distribution of Actinidia arguta var. arguta (green spots), A. arguta var. giraldii (red spots), and A. melanandra (blue spots), and (B) the sympatric areas of three taxa sampled in the present study. The pie diagrams represent the proportion of A. arguta var. arguta (Green), A. arguta var. giraldii (red), and A. melanandra (blue) in each population. Population names and locations according to Table 1.

Table 1.

Ploidy and geographical distribution of Actinidia arguta var. arguta, A. arguta var. giraldii and A. melanandra in 16 populations from the Qinling Mountain, China.

Location Population code Taxon range (m) Longitude and Latitude Altitude Number of ploidy races
4x 8x 10x
Laojielin, Luanchuan County, Henan Province HNS A. arguta var. arguta 111°41′46.86″ E, 33°41′45.02″ N 1148–1152 4
A. arguta var. giraldii 1276–1512 7
Taiping, Luanchuan County, Henan Province HNT A. arguta var. arguta 111°39′30.51″ E, 33°38′37.99″ N 1005–1431 16
A. arguta var. giraldii 1005 1
Laojunshan, Luanchuan County, Henan Province HNL A. arguta var. arguta 111°38′12.24″ E, 33°45′04.02″ N 835–1111 13
Shiziping, Lushi County, Henan Province HLS A. arguta var. arguta 110°51′10.89″ E, 33°47′36.78″ N 1140–1359 7
Heilongkou, Shangluo County, Shaanxi Province SSH A. melanandra 109°38′59.01″ E, 34°04′36.01″ N 1371–1378 7
Qingyu, Lantian County, Shaanxi Province SLQ A. arguta var. arguta 109°35'17.39″ E, 34°13′34.48″ N 1185–1390 5
A. melanandra 1200 1
Gepai, Lantian County, Shaanxi Province SLG A. arguta var. arguta 109°28′50.02″ E, 33°53′09.01″ N 1406–1410 8
A. melanandra 1406–1410 6
Peiyu, Changan County, Shaanxi Province SCP A. arguta var. giraldii 108°49′56.11″ E, 33°52′38.03″ N 1545–1587 3
Hegou, Hu County, Shaanxi Province SHH A. arguta var. giraldii 108°26′54.45″ E, 33°52′11.26″ N 1215–1429 4 1
Xiliu, Hu County, Shaanxi Province SHX A. arguta var. arguta 108°23′33.56″ E, 33°48′34.11″ N 1500–1672 2
A. melanandra 1500–1550 2
A. arguta var. giraldii 1550 1
Tongche, Nongshan County, Shaanxi Province SNT A. arguta var. arguta 108°02′12.51″ E, 33°21′18.42″ N 601–696 3
Bangfang, Zhouzhi County, Shaanxi Province SZB A. melanandra 107°58′30.10″ E, 33°46′03.67″ N 1424–1701 4
A. arguta var. giraldii 1385 1
Taibai, Mei County, Shaanxi Province SMT A. arguta var. arguta 107°42′36.03″ E, 34°05′06.47″ N 1260–1300 5
A. melanandra 1260–1300 2
A. arguta var. giraldii 1285 1
Xigou, Baoji County, Shaanxi Province SBX A. arguta var. giraldii 107°04′28.71″ E, 34°40′02.98″ N 1232–1350 1 4
Maiji, Tianshui County, Gansu Province GTM A. arguta var. arguta 106°06'48.05″ E, 34°22′45.52″ N 1603 1
A. melanandra 1560–1606 2
Mayanhe, Hui County, Gansu Province GHM A. melanandra 105°44′06.32″ E, 34°05′29.13″ N 1400–1520 3
A. arguta var. giraldii 1455–1481 4
Total: 119 samples 91 17 11
Open in a new tab

Kiwiberries plants were initially classified as A. arguta var. arguta, A. arguta var. giraldii, or A. melanandra following the taxonomic treatment of Actinidia (Li J. et al., 2007), and their phenotypic traits were preliminary recorded. In addition, the fruits were harvested and stored fresh in a refrigerator for trait assessment in Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China. Voucher specimens of the leaves were made and deposited in the Herbarium of Xian Botanical Garden (XBG) for microscopic examination using an Olympus BH-2 microscope coupled with a Nikon D800 camera (Tokyo, Japan). The dormant canes were pruned to graft onto rootstocks at the kiwifruit orchard at XBG for phenological investigations, and to sprout new leaves for ploidy analysis at Wuhan Botanical Garden.

Ploidy examination

The ploidy level of each individual was determined by the flow cytometric measurement (FCM) using a flow cytometry system (Partec Cyflow Space, Germany). The new leaves of each sample were chopped and lysed in nuclear extraction buffer (solution A of High Resolution Kit, Partec, Germany) to extract the cells, followed by chromosome staining of 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. FCM was based on a linear relationship between the fluorescence signals of the unknown sample and known internal standards. In the present study, individual DNA ploidy levels were calculated after comparing the position of the fluorescence peak of the unknown sample and the internal standard Actinidia. chinensis var. chinensis “Hongyang” (2n = 2x = 58), whose chromosome number had previously been determined by counting. The detail experimental procedure followed the basic protocol of Li et al. (2010).

Trait assessment

The organic size is an important aspect of polyploids that has been associated with crop yield. A total of 8 quantitative characters including leaf length and width, petiole length, flower diameter, fruit weight, length, greater, and less diameter were qualified in 119 samples at least 3 times. The measurement was carried out between 2011 and 2015 based on the following procedures. The second and third leaves on strong stems were chosen and over 30 leaves were measured in each sample using Vernier calipers (Table 2; Table S2). The diameters of 30 flowers per sample were also determined by Vernier calipers. Thirty-five fruits were randomly selected for size and average weight determination (Figure 2).

Table 2.

Dimensional variation of leaves, flowers, and fruit among Actinidia arguta var. arguta, A. arguta var. giraldii, and A. melanandra.

Taxon (ploidy levels) Fruit Flower Leaf
Length (mm) Greater diameter (mm) Lesser diameter (mm) Weight (g) Diameter Length (mm) Width (mm) Petiole length
A. arguta var. arguta (4x) 27.44 ± 6.35a 18.68 ± 2.51b 17.09 ± 1.82b 4.85 ± 1.63b 19.30 ± 1.8a 97.17 ± 13.45b 56.22 ± 11.00b 44.74 ± 9.69b
A. arguta var. giraldii (8x and 10x) 29.49 ± 6.24a 13.64 ± 1.99a 13.26 ± 1.57a 2.92 ± 1.27a 20.00 ± 1.2a 110.07 ± 13.67c 68.85 ± 15.17c 52.91 ± 12.80c
A. melanandra (4x) 29.07 ± 4.00a 21.36 ± 3.10c 19.66 ± 2.831c 6.71 ± 1.52c 19.23 ± 1.6a 88.67 ± 14.35a 44.24 ± 9.65a 38.41 ± 11.21a
P value 0.230ns 0*** 0*** 0*** 0.113ns 0*** 0*** 0***
Open in a new tab

Values are given as the mean ± s.d. Values in rows marked with different letters are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05. (

***

P < 0.001; ns, not significant).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Natural kiwiberries (A. arguta and related species) collected from the Qinling Mountain, China. Fruits of (A–C) tetraploid A. arguta var. arguta, (G–I) tetraploid A. melanandra, (D,E) octaploid A. arguta var. giraldii (F) decaploid A. arguta var. giraldii, (J,K) elite germplasms selected from A. arguta var. giraldii.

Qualitative characteristic analysis is an important feature for yield the performance of kiwiberries. Therefore, the content of soluble solids, ascorbic acid, total sugar, total acid, and total amino acids in all samples were measured according to the National Standard Methods of China. Total acid content, expressed as percentage of citric acid, was determined after titrating to pH 8.2 ± 0.1 using 0.1 M NaOH (SAC, 2008). Soluble solids content was estimated as the mean of digital refractometer (Atago; Japan) readings taken of juice expressed from the 10 mm end caps removed from opposite ends of the fruits. Total sugar was determined by a direct titrimetric method using Fehling's reagent (SB/T 10203–1994). Ascorbic acid (vitamin C) content was estimated by titration using the colored oxidation/reduction indicator 2, 6-dichlorophenolindophenol (SAC, 1994). Total and amino acids were determined by the ninhydrin colorimetric method (Chinese standard GB/T 5009, 2003) using an automatic amino acid analyser (model 8800; Hitachi Ltd., Japan). Upon determining that, A. arguta var. giraldii had obviously higher content of total amino acids than A. arguta var. arguta and A. melanandra, the content of 17 amino acids were further measured. In addition, the fruit of 35 samples (14 samples of A. arguta var. arguta, 9 samples of A. arguta var. giraldii and 12 samples of A. melanandra) showed brilliant red-fleshed color, and their total anthocyanins were extracted by methanol/formic acid and analyzed by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) followed the method described by Comeskey et al. (2009).

Statistics

Statistical calculations were performed using IBM® SPSS® Statistics 20 software (IBM SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All data were assessed for normality and homogeneity of variance (Kolmogorov–Smirnov test) prior to further analysis to fulfill the requirements of statistical analysis of variance. Differences between the fruit, flower and leaf characters of A. arguta var. arguta, A. arguta var. giraldii, and A. melanandra were evaluated using one-way ANOVA at p ≤ 0.05 and 0.01. When ANOVA was significant, the means were discriminated using Duncan's test. Correlations between ecological and climate factors vs. cytotypes' distribution and morphological/fruit quality characters vs. ploidy levels were estimated using Pearson's correlation analysis.

Results

Cytotype variation and geographical distribution

Three DNA ploidy levels (4x, 8x, and 10x) were detected: A. arguta var. giraldii at 8x and 10x, and A. arguta var. arguta and A. melanandra at 4x. The most frequent cytotype was 4x, accounting for 76.47% of the samples studied (Table 1). Sympatric occurrence of A. arguta var. arguta (4x), A. arguta var. giraldii (8x and 10x) and A. melanandra (4x) was common in 16 sampled sites. In addition, all possible combination of cytotypes were found: 4x and 10x plants co-existed in the SZB, SMT and GHM populations; 4x and 8x plants in the HNS, HNT, and SHX populations; and 8x and 10x plants in the SHH and SBX populations.

The eco-geographical distribution of A. arguta var. giraldii, A. arguta var. arguta, and A. melanandra on multivariate vertical gradient, solar radiation, temperature, and precipitation are listed in Table S1 and depicted in Figure 1. Base on one-way ANOVA analysis, their eco-geographical distribution among three taxa had obvious difference of climate change, except for the maximum humidity (Figure 3). Of that, A. arguta var. giraldii (8x and 10x, 1,409 m asl) located at highest altitude, but it was not significantly different from A. melanandra (1,395 m). Furthermore, the individuals with higher ploidy levels (8x and 10x) did not show better adaptability for extreme temperature, higher solar radiation, lowest precipitation, and humidity. Similarity, Pearson correlation analysis demonstrated there was no significant relationship (P < 0.01) between ploidy levels and climate conditions (Table S3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

The effect of climate and environment on Actinidia arguta var. arguta, A. arguta var. giraldii and A. melanandra.

The quantitative traits of kiwiberries' fruits, leaves, and flowers

Dimensional variation of leaves, flowers, and fruits among Actinidia arguta var. arguta, A. arguta var. giraldii, and A. melanandra are listed in Table 2. Octaploid and decaploid A. arguta var. giraldii had larger leaves than tetraploid A. arguta var. arguta and A. melanandra. However, fruit sizes of tetraploid A. melanandra were larger than A. arguta var. arguta which were, in turn, larger than those of octaploid and decaploid A. arguta var. giraldii. There was no significant difference between the flower sizes (P = 0.11 > 0.05) and fruit length (P = 0.23 > 0.05) among the three taxa. Pearson's correlation analysis confirmed that, ploidy level of three taxa had a negative relationship with fruit size (−0.67 < r < −0.53; P = 0 < 0.01), but positively correlated with leaf size (0.36 < r < 0.48; P = 0 < 0.01) (Table S4).

Analysis of the traits related to flavor and nutrition are shown in Table 3. Obvious variations were detected among the three taxa. The total sugar content varied from 6.38 to 8.67 g/100 g F.W., while the total acid content varied from 0.89 to 1.17 g/100 g F.W. The soluble solids content ranged from 12.85 to 13.88, which did not show significant difference (P = 0.092 > 0.05). The highest contents of soluble solids, total sugar, and total acid content were observed in fruit of A. arguta var. arguta, while the lowest were observed in A. arguta var. giraldii.

Table 3.

Concentrations of total sugars, soluble solids, total anthocyanin, total acids, ascorbic acid, and amino acids in fruit of Actinidia arguta var. arguta, A. arguta var. giraldii, and A. melanandra collected from the Qinling Mountain, China (g/100 g fresh weight).

Species Total sugar Soluble solids content (%) Total anthocyanin Total acid Ascorbic acid Total amino acid
A. arguta var. arguta 8.66336 ± 1.5416b 13.88 ± 2.15a 1.61 ± 1.11 1.1683 ± 0.2754a 0.0518 ± 0.0186a 0.9298 ± 0.1958a
A. arguta var. giraldii 6.3786 ± 1.9987a 12.85 ± 1.91a 6.06 ± 2.18 0.8939 ± 0.1618a 0.0889 ± 0.0366b 1.6338 ± 0.3570b
A. melanandra 8.5785 ± 0.9452b 13.68 ± 2.01a 6.82 ± 2.67 1.0759 ± 0.2694b 0.07871 ± 0.016b 0.9522 ± 0.0959a
P-value 0*** 0.092ns 0.02** 0*** 0*** 0***
Open in a new tab

Values are given as the mean ± s.d. Values in rows marked with different letters are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.

**, ***

, at P < 0.01, 0.001, respectively; ns, not significant.

It is obvious that fruit of A. arguta var. giraldii contained more ascorbic acid and total amino acids than fruit from A. arguta var. arguta and A. melanandra. Ascorbic acid of three taxa varied significantly from 0.05 to 0.09 g/100 g F.W. and the total amino acids varied from 0.93 to 1.63 g/100 g F.W. In particular, the contents of 17 amino acids in octaploid and decaploid A. arguta var. giraldii were generally higher than that in other two tetraploid taxa in present study (Table 3; Figure 4). Moreover, high standard deviations (e.g., total sugar in A. arguta var. giraldii: 6. 3786 ± 1.998; Table 3) within taxa indicate high intra-variability in natural kiwiberries.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

The differentiation of 17 amino acids content among Actinidia arguta var. arguta, A. arguta var. giraldii and A. melanandra.

Morphological and phenological variation

Fruit morphology of three taxa examined was highly variable both in the shape and color. A. arguta var. arguta predominantly had green fruit, whereas the fruits of A. melanandra and A. arguta var. giraldii were red or purple in color that differed in intensity (Figure 2). The average anthocyanins contents in A. arguta var. giraldii (6.11 mg/100 g F. W.) and A. melanandra (6.82 mg/100 g F. W.) are higher than A. arguta var. arguta (1.61 mg/100 g F. W.) in studied samples. Fruit shape of A. arguta var. arguta and A. melanandra (including ovoid, round, globose, oblong, and ellipsoidal) was more variable than A. arguta var. giraldii, whose fruit was similar in length but much leaner (Table 2).

Leaf shape and texture were similar in all three taxa. There was some micro-variation in the characteristics of the lower surface of the leaves (Figure S1). First, the lower surface of A. melanandra leaves were glaucous (Figure S1B), while this covering was almost completely absent from the leaves of both A. arguta var. arguta (Figure S1A) and A. arguta var. giraldii (Figures S1C,D). Secondly, the mid-vein on the lower surface of the leaves of A. arguta var. giraldii had a curly tomentum (Figures S1C,D), which was absent or very sparse on leaves of A. arguta var. arguta and A. melanandra.

There was no significant difference between the flower morphology of the three taxa (Figure S2). The flowers typically had white to light green petals, white filaments, and dark brown or black anthers. However, there were significant differences in phenology (Figure S3). A. arguta var. arguta (4x) and A. melanandra (4x) flowered in late April, partially overlapping from 2014 to 2016, whereas A. arguta var. giraldii (8x and 10x) flowered much later in mid-May. The ploidy races (8x and 10x) of A. arguta var. giraldii did not differ significantly in flowering time.

Discussion

The ploidy variations, distribution patterns and co-existent mechanisms

High-throughput ploidy analyses based on flow cytometry have revolutionized the study of ploidy variations and cyto-geography of Actinidia species (Ollitrault-Sammarcelli et al., 1994; Yan et al., 1997; Li et al., 2010), the chromosomes of which are particularly small and numerous (e.g., decaploid, 2n = 10x = 290). Octoploids and decaploids were initially discovered in natural A. arguta var. giraldii var. giraldii, which scattered in Qinling Mountains. Tetraploid A. arguta var. giraldii var. arguta and A. melanandra are the predominant ploidy races (76.47%), consistent with previous studies in Japan (Kataoka et al., 2010) and China (Li et al., 2013). Diploid kiwiberry (A. hypoleuca) was documented in Japan (Watanabe et al., 1990; Kataoka et al., 2010) that normally localized in relatively warm Pacific regions. Surprisingly, diploid species, as ancestors of polyploid races, were absented from the distributional areas of A. arguta var. giraldii and A. melanandra. The competitive exclusion could lead to their elimination from sympatric areas by polyploid progenies, who frequently grow larger and faster, with higher yields and better resistance to disease (Fowler and Levin, 1984; Te Beest et al., 2012; Renny-Byfield and Wendel, 2014). To sum up, we cautiously concluded that natural kiwiberries (A. arguta var. giraldii and related species) has the ploidy levels as following: A. hypoleuca-2x, A. melanandra- 4x, A. arguta var. giraldii var. arguta-4x, 6x, 7x, and 8x, A. arguta var. giraldii var. giraldii −8x and 10x.

The distributional pattern in sympatric areas of A. arguta var. giraldii var. arguta, A. arguta var. giraldii var. giraldii, and A. melanandra is characterized by a high frequency of mixed-ploidy populations (56.25%). The cytotype mixture was considered to be an evolutionarily unstable pattern, likely reflecting in situ formation or frequent cytotype immigration, consistent with the minority cytotype exclusion model (Levin, 1975), resulting in the elimination of the minority cytotypes (Baack, 2005; Zozomová-Lihová et al., 2015). Recent studies, however, have shown that mixed-cytotype populations are frequent and that balancing selection is commonly observed in these populations (Burton and Husband, 1999; Keeler, 2004; Kao, 2007; Castro et al., 2012; Duchoslav et al., 2016). Theoretical studies suggest that the long-term sympatric growth of cytotypes can only be maintained when different ploidy races have strong post- or prezygotic isolation mechanisms (Levin, 1975; Rodríguez, 1996). In the present study, no obvious niche differentiation was observed within the population to balance the spatial segregation of polyploidy species. However, over the three years studied, tetraploids consistently flowered much earlier than octaploids and decaploids (Figure S3). Divergence in flowering time is a by-product of natural selection, potentially resulting in reproductive isolation to maintain the co-existence of cytotypes (Van Dijk and Bijlsma, 1994; Petit et al., 1997); in the present study, the prezygotic isolation mechanism also played an important role in the co-existence of cytotypes in the 4x and 8x (HNA and HNT) and 4x and 10x populations (SZB and GHM).

The plus, the better? higher ploidy level vs. ecological adaption and agnomical traits

Polyploids are deem to be more resistant to extreme condition (Stebbins, 1985; Brochmann et al., 2004), such as higher altitude, cold, heat, or drought stress, which lead them more easier to invasion of new habitats (Te Beest et al., 2012). For example, a systematic investigation of the allopolyploid, autopolyploid, and diploid hybrid species along an elevation gradient from sea level to 4,500 m within British Columbia, Canada, provided evidence that polyploids were disproportionately present at high elevations (Vamosi and McEwen, 2012). Previous studies within Actinidia genus have shown that hexaploid A. chinensis var. deliciosa plants in China grow at higher altitudes than both tetraploid and diploid A. chinensis var. chinensis plants (Li et al., 2010) and hexaploid A. arguta var. giraldii var. arguta plants are geographically localized in the colder regions of Japan, whereas diploid plants of the closely related A. hypoleuca are located in warmer regions (Kataoka et al., 2010). In this study, A. arguta var. giraldii var. giraldii, with higher ploidy levels (8x and 10x), were scattered in higher altitude than A. arguta var. giraldii var. argute, but the difference is no significant with tetraploid A. melanandra. In particular, the tetraploid A. melanandra could survived in more challenging climate, extreme temperature and few precipitation for instance (Figure 2). With diversified species, the tetraploid accounts for the highest proportion of ploidy races in natural kiwiberries, and successfully colonize different environments (Kataoka et al., 2010; Li et al., 2013). The adaptability of kiwiberries to harsh environments and climates, therefore, could not consistently enhance in response to the elevated ploidy levels.

The association between ploidy levels and morphological or quality characteristics is certainly complex in Actinidia genus. Studies on ploidy manipulation further confirmed that the fruit of colchicine-induced autotetraploids of A. chinensis were 50 to 60% larger than those of their diploid progenitors (Wu et al., 2012, 2013). A previous study on A. arguta var. giraldii and related species confirmed larger leaf and fruit sizes in the tetraploid and hexaploid fruit of A. arguta var. giraldii in Japan (Kataoka et al., 2010). In the present study, the leaf size was obviously larger in these individuals and positively correlated with higher ploidy levels (8x and 10x). Particularly, the nutritional ingredients of A. arguta var. giraldii var. giraldii (8x and 10x), including the amount of ascorbic acid and amino acids, were much higher than tetraploid A. arguta var. giraldii var. arguta and A. melanandra, implying that A. arguta var. giraldii var. giraldii could serve as a useful germplasm to attain rapid genetic improvement with respect to improved nutritional ingredients. However, the disadvantage of high ploidy races should be highlighted to scientists and breeders, as the fruit shape significantly varied after polyploidization of diploid A. chinensis (Wu et al., 2012). In addition, reduced flesh firmness and dry matter and less intense golden flesh color were observed in autotetraploid plants compared with parental diploid plants (Wu et al., 2013). In the present study, the fruit size of A. arguta var. giraldii var. giraldii decreased with the increasing ploidy level (8x and 10x), and some commercially important characteristics associated with fruit quality (e.g., total sugar and total acid content) was also poor on 8x and 10x plants. Therefore, the morphological and quality characteristics were not necessarily positively and linearly correlated with continuously increasing ploidy levels (Table S4). Thus, higher ploidy is not inevitably better in the Actinidia genus.

Conclusion and breeding implication

Studies of the natural resources of A. arguta var. giraldii and related species have enhanced our current understanding of ploidy variation, distributional pattern, and co-existence mechanisms of cytotypes. The establishment of a genetic diversity center of A. arguta var. giraldii and related species near Qinling Mountain, where species with abundant ploidy variations and diversified phenotypes presenting colorful fruit fresh, variable fruit shape, different fruit size, and nutritional compositions are detected (Figure 2), would be advantageous. The relationship between ploidy levels and agronomic traits, such as the polyploid advantage on a higher content of ascorbic acid and amino acids, and the disadvantages regarding ecological adaptation, fruit size, and fruit flavor, will improve our knowledge of multi-polyploidization in plants.

Substantially, the present study of new genotypes, including higher nutrient content, edible skins, colorful fruit flesh (red, purple) and new flavors, is the first step in germplasm exploration, and we expect to extend the utility of such genetic material to ultimately improve traditional kiwifruit quality, which is characterized by brown hairy skin, green flesh and acid flavor. To achieve task, symmetrical large-scale surveys, and detailed evaluations (solid soluble content, dry matter, aroma, yield, etc.) of natural germplasms planted in kiwifruit orchards are needed. Similarly, whole genome re-sequencing of A. arguta var. giraldii var. arguta, A. arguta var. giraldii var. giraldii, and A. melanandra should be conducted, although there may be particular challenges for analyzing improvement traits, reflecting the high genomic heterozygosity and inadequacies of the analytic techniques used to examine polyploidy. We anticipate that these methodological challenges will be overcome by advances in genome sequencing technologies (Faino and Thomma, 2014). Finally, other powerful approaches (e.g., CRISPR-Cas system) (Kanchiswamy et al., 2015) for the examination of kiwifruit will improve association studies examining the genotype vs. phenotype, an essential prerequisite to targeted breeding efforts.

Author contributions

DL and YZ conceived and planned the study. YZ and CZ collected the materials and measured the traits of fruit, leaf and flower. XS provided materials and data of A. arguta var. arguta of North China. DL, YL, and QZ tested the ploidy levels. DL wrote the manuscript.

Funding

This research is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project no. 31572092) and the Agricultural Public Relations Project of Shaanxi Technology Committee (Project no. 2014K01-07-02).

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Ross Ferguson for critically reading and revising the article and Lv Haiyan for assay support.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2017.00711/full#supplementary-material

Click here for additional data file. (67.5KB, pdf)
Click here for additional data file. (365.2KB, docx)

References

  1. Adams K. L., Wendel J. F. (2005). Polyploidy and genome evolution in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 8, 135–141. 10.1016/j.pbi.2005.01.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Asakura I., Hoshino Y. (2016). Distribution, ploidy levels, and fruit characteristics of three Actinidia species native to Hokkaido, Japan. Horticult. J. 85, 105–114. 10.2503/hortj.MI-082 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baack E. J. (2005). Ecological factors influencing tetraploid establishment in snow buttercups (Ranunculus adoneus, Ranunculaceae): minority cytotype exclusion and barriers to triploid formation. Am. J. Bot. 92, 1827–1835. 10.3732/ajb.92.11.1827 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bieniek A. (2012). Yield, morphology and biological value of fruits of Actinidia arguta and Actinidia purpurea and some of their hybrid cultivars grown in north-eastern Poland. Acta. Sci. Pol. Hortorum. Cultus 11, 117–130. [Google Scholar]
  5. Boyd L., McNeilage M., Macrae E., Ferguson A., Beatson R., Martin P., et al. (2002). Development and commercialization of 'baby kiwi'(Actinidia arguta Planch.), in V International Symposium on Kiwifruit (Wuhan: ). [Google Scholar]
  6. Brochmann C., Brysting A., Alsos I., Borgen L., Grundt H., Scheen A. C., et al. (2004). Polyploidy in arctic plants. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 82, 521–536. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00337.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Burton T. L., Husband B. C. (1999). Population cytotype structure in the polyploid Galax urceolata (Diapensiaceae). Heredity 82, 381–390. 10.1038/sj.hdy.6884910 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Castro S., Loureiro J., Procházka T., Münzbergová Z. (2012). Cytotype distribution at a diploid–hexaploid contact zone in Aster amellus (Asteraceae). Ann. Bot. 110, 1047–1055. 10.1093/aob/mcs177 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cheng S. H., Zhuang J. Y., Fan Y. Y., Du J. H., Cao L. Y. (2007). Progress in research and development on hybrid rice: a super-domesticate in China. Ann. Bot. 100, 959–966. 10.1093/aob/mcm121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chinese standard GB/T 5009 (2003). Chinese Standard GB/T 5009.124-2003, 2004. Inspection of Grain and Oilseeds: Method for Determination of Amino Acids in Foods. Beijing: Standards Press of China. [Google Scholar]
  11. Comai L. (2005). The advantages and disadvantages of being polyploid. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 836–846. 10.1038/nrg1711 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Comeskey D. J., Montefiori M., Edwards P. J. B., McGhie T. K. (2009). Isolation and structural identification of the anthocyanin components of red kiwifruit. Agric. Food Chem. 57, 2035–2039. 10.1021/jf803287d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Crow J. F. (1998). 90 years ago: the beginning of hybrid maize. Genetics 148, 923–928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Datson P., Ferguson A. (2011). Actinidia, in Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources, ed Kole C. (Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer; ), 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  15. Datson P., Nardozza S., Manako K., Herrick J., Martinez-Sanchez M., Curtis C., et al. (2013). Monitoring the Actinidia germplasm for resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. Actinidiae, in I International Symposium on Bacterial Canker of Kiwifruit (Mt Maunganui: ). [Google Scholar]
  16. Dhawan O., Lavania U. (1996). Enhancing the productivity of secondary metabolites via induced polyploidy: a review. Euphytica 87, 81–89. 10.1007/BF00021879 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dubcovsky J., Dvorak J. (2007). Genome plasticity a key factor in the success of polyploid wheat under domestication. Science 316, 1862–1866. 10.1126/science.1143986 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Duchoslav M., Fialová M., Jandová M. (2016). The ecological performance of tetra-, penta-and hexaploid geophyte Allium oleraceum in reciprocal transplant experiment may explain the occurrence of multiple-cytotype populations. J. Plant Ecol. rtw039 10.1093/jpe/rtw039 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Duvick D. N. (2001). Biotechnology in the 1930s: the development of hybrid maize. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2, 69–74. 10.1038/35047587 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Faino L., Thomma B. P. (2014). Get your high-quality low-cost genome sequence. Trends Plant Sci. 19, 288–291. 10.1016/j.tplants.2014.02.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ferguson A. (2007). The need for characterisation and evaluation of germplasm: kiwifruit as an example. Euphytica 154, 371–382. 10.1007/s10681-006-9188-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ferguson A., Huang H. (2007). Genetic resources of kiwifruit: domestication and breeding. Hortic. Rev. 33, 1–121. 10.1002/9780470168011.ch1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ferguson A., Seal A. (2008). Kiwifruit, in Temperate Fruit Crop Breeding, ed Hancock J. F. (Springer; ), 235–264. [Google Scholar]
  24. Fowler N. L., Levin D. A. (1984). Ecological constraints on the establishment of a novel polyploid in competition with its diploid progenitor. Am. Nat. 124, 703–711. 10.1086/284307 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hijmans R. J., Gavrilenko T., Stephenson S., Bamberg J., Salas A., Spooner D. M. (2007). Geographical and environmental range expansion through polyploidy in wild potatoes (Solanum section Petota). Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 16, 485–495. 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00308.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kagan-Zur V., Yaron-Miron D., Mizrahi Y. (1991). A study of triploid tomato fruit attributes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116, 228–231. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kanchiswamy C. N., Sargent D. J., Velasco R., Maffei M. E., Malnoy M. (2015). Looking forward to genetically edited fruit crops. Trends Biotechnol. 33, 62–64. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2014.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kao R. H. (2007). Asexuality and the coexistence of cytotypes. New Phytol. 175, 764–772. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02145.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kataoka I., Mizugami T., Kim J. G., Beppu K., Fukuda T., Sugahara S., et al. (2010). Ploidy variation of hardy kiwifruit (Actinidia arguta) resources and geographic distribution in Japan. Sci. Hortic. 124, 409–414. 10.1016/j.scienta.2010.01.016 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Keeler K. H. (2004). Impact of intraspecific polyploidy in Andropogon gerardii (Poaceae) populations. Am. Midl. Nat. 152, 63–74. 10.1674/0003-0031(2004)152[0063:IOIPIA]2.0.CO;2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. King K., Seppälä O., Neiman M. (2012). Is more better? Polyploidy and parasite resistance. Biol. Lett. 8, 598–600. 10.1098/rsbl.2011.1152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lavania U. C. (2013). Polyploidy, body size, and opportunities for genetic enhancement and fixation of heterozygosity in plants. Nucleus 56, 1–6. 10.1007/s13237-013-0075-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lavania U. C., Srivastava S., Lavania S., Basu S., Misra N. K., Mukai Y. (2012). Autopolyploidy differentially influences body size in plants, but facilitates enhanced accumulation of secondary metabolites, causing increased cytosine methylation. Plant J. 71, 539–549. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.05006.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Leitch A., Leitch I. (2008). Genomic plasticity and the diversity of polyploid plants. Science 320, 481–483. 10.1126/science.1153585 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Levin D. A. (1975). Minority cytotype exclusion in local plant populations. Taxon 24, 35–43. 10.2307/1218997 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Levin D. A. (2002). The Role of Chromosomal Change in Plant Evolution. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  37. Li D., Liu Y., Zhong C., Huang H. (2010). Morphological and cytotype variation of wild kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis complex) along an altitudinal and longitudinal gradient in central-west China. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 164, 72–83. 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2010.01073.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Li J., Li X., Soejarto D. (2007). Actinidiaceae. Flora China 12, 334–360. [Google Scholar]
  39. Li X., Li J., Soejarto D. D. (2007). New synonyms in Actinidiaceae from China. Acta Phylotaxon Sin. 45, 633–660. 10.1360/aps06061 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Li Z. Z., Man Y. P., Lan X. Y., Wang Y. C. (2013). Ploidy and phenotype variation of a natural Actnidia arguta population in the east of Daba Mountain located in a region of Shaanxi. Sci. Hortic. 161, 259–265. 10.1016/j.scienta.2013.07.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Luo Y., Yen X., Zhang G., Liang G. (1992). Agronomic traits and chromosome behavior of autotetraploid sorghums. Plant Breed. 109, 46–53. 10.1111/j.1439-0523.1992.tb00149.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Matich A. J., Young H., Allen J. M., Wang M. Y., Fielder S., McNeilage M. A., et al. (2003). Actinidia arguta: volatile compounds in fruit and flowers. Phytochemistry 63, 285–301. 10.1016/S0031-9422(03)00142-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Nishiyama I., Fukuda T., Oota T. (2005). Genotypic differences in chlorophyll, lutein, and β-carotene contents in the fruits of Actinidia species. J. Agr. Food Chem. 53, 6403–6407. 10.1021/jf050785y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Nishiyama I., Fukuda T., Shimohashi A., Oota T. (2008). Sugar and organic acid composition in the fruit juice of different Actinidia varieties. Food Sci. Technol. Res. 14, 67–73. 10.3136/fstr.14.67 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Ollitrault-Sammarcelli F., Legave J., Michaux-Ferriere N., Hirsch A. M. (1994). Use of flow cytometry for rapid determination of ploidy level in the genus Actinidia. Sci. Hortic. 57, 303–313. 10.1016/S0304-4238(94)90113-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Otto S. P., Whitton J. (2000). Polyploid incidence and evolution. Annu. Rev. Genet. 34, 401–437. 10.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Petit C., Lesbros P., Ge X., Thompson J. D. (1997). Variation in flowering phenology and selfing rate across a contact zone between diploid and tetraploid Arrhenatherum elatius (Poaceae). Heredity 79, 31–40. 10.1038/hdy.1997.120 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Renny-Byfield S., Wendel J. F. (2014). Doubling down on genomes: polyploidy and crop plants. Am. J. Bot. 101, 1711–1725. 10.3732/ajb.1400119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Rodríguez D. J. (1996). Model for the establishment of polyploidy in plants: viable but infertile hybrids, iteroparity, and demographic stochasticity. J. Theor. Biol. 3, 189–196. 10.1006/jtbi.1996.0095 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. SAC (1994). Determination of Vitamin C in Vegetables and Fruits (2. 6- dichloro-indophenol titration. Beijing: Standards Press of China. [Google Scholar]
  51. SAC (2008). Determination of Total Acid in Foods. Vol. GB/T 12456-2008, Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China. Beijing: Standards Press of China. [Google Scholar]
  52. Soltis D. E., Albert V. A., Leebens-Mack J., Bell C. D., Paterson A. H., Zheng C., et al. (2009). Polyploidy and angiosperm diversification. Am. J. Bot. 96, 336–348. 10.3732/ajb.0800079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Soltis D. E., Buggs R., Doyle J. J., Soltis P. S. (2010). What we still don't know about polyploidy. Taxon 59, 1387–1403. 10.2307/20774036 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Sonnleitner M., Hülber K., Flatscher R., García P. E., Winkler M., Suda J., et al. (2016). Ecological differentiation of diploid and polyploid cytotypes of Senecio carniolicus sensu lato (Asteraceae) is stronger in areas of sympatry. Ann. Bot. 117, 269–276. 10.1093/aob/mcv176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Stebbins G. L. (1985). Polyploidy, hybridization, and the invasion of new habitats. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 72, 824–832. 10.2307/2399224 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Suda J., Weiss-Schneeweiss H., Tribsch A., Schneeweiss G. M., Trávníček P., Schönswetter P. (2007). Complex distribution patterns of di-, tetra-, and hexaploid cytotypes in the European high mountain plant Senecio carniolicus (Asteraceae). Am. J. Bot. 94, 1391–1401. 10.3732/ajb.94.8.1391 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Te Beest M., Le Roux J. J., Richardson D. M., Brysting A. K., Suda J., Kubešová M., et al. (2012). The more the better? The role of polyploidy in facilitating plant invasions. Ann. Bot. 109, 19–45. 10.1093/aob/mcr277 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Udall J. A., Wendel J. F. (2006). Polyploidy and crop improvement. Crop Sci. 46, 3–14. 10.2135/cropsci2006.07.0489tpg [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Uddin M., Ellison F., O'brien L., Latter B. (1992). Heterosis in F1 hybrids derived from crosses of adapted Australian wheats. Crop Pasture Sci. 43, 907–919. 10.1071/AR9920907 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Vamosi J. C., McEwen J. R. (2012). Origin, elevation, and evolutionary success of hybrids and polyploids in British Columbia, Canada. Botany 91, 182–188. 10.1139/cjb-2012-0177 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. Van Dijk P., Bijlsma R. (1994). Simulations of flowering time displacement between two cytotypes that form inviable hybrids. Heredity 72, 522–535. 10.1038/hdy.1994.70 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Wagner W. (1970). Biosystematics and evolutionary noise. Taxon 19, 146–151. [Google Scholar]
  63. Warner D. A., Ku M. S., Edwards G. E. (1987). Photosynthesis, leaf anatomy, and cellular constituents in the polyploid C4 grass Panicum virgatum. Plant Physiol. 84, 461–466. 10.1104/pp.84.2.461 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Watanabe K., Takahashi B., Shirato K. (1990). Chromosome numbers in kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) and related species. J. Jpn. Soc. Food Sci. 58, 835–840. 10.2503/jjshs.58.835 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Wendel J. F., Cronn R. C. (2003). Polyploidy and the evolutionary history of cotton. Adv Agron. 78, 139–186. 10.1016/S0065-2113(02)78004-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  66. Wu J. H., Ferguson A. R., Murray B. G., Duffy A. M., Jia Y., Cheng C., et al. (2013). Fruit quality in induced polyploids of Actinidia chinensis. HortScience 48, 701–707. [Google Scholar]
  67. Wu J. H., Ferguson A. R., Murray B. G., Jia Y., Datson P. M., Zhang J. (2012). Induced polyploidy dramatically increases the size and alters the shape of fruit in Actinidia chinensis. Ann. Bot. 109, 169–179. 10.1093/aob/mcr256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Yan G., Yao J., Ferguson A., McNeilage M., Seal A., Murray B. (1997). New reports of chromosome numbers in Actinidia (Actinidiaceae). New Zeal. J. Bot. 35, 181–186. 10.1080/0028825X.1997.10414154 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Zozomová-Lihová J., Malánová-Krásná I., Vít P., Urfus T., Senko D., Svitok M., et al. (2015). Cytotype distribution patterns, ecological differentiation, and genetic structure in a diploid–tetraploid contact zone of Cardamine amara. Am. J. Bot. 102, 1380–1395. 10.3732/ajb.1500052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Click here for additional data file. (67.5KB, pdf)
Click here for additional data file. (365.2KB, docx)

Articles from Frontiers in Plant Science are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES