Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1977 Dec;60(6):850–853. doi: 10.1104/pp.60.6.850

Stomatal and Nonstomatal Regulation of Water Use in Cotton, Corn, and Sorghum 1

Robert C Ackerson a,2, Daniel R Krieg a
PMCID: PMC542732  PMID: 16660199

Abstract

Stomata of corn (Zea mays L.) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) responded to changes in leaf water potential during the vegetative growth phase. During reproductive growth, leaf resistances were minimal and stomata were no longer sensitive to bulk leaf water status even when leaf water potentials approached −27 bars. Stomata of corn, cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), and sorghum appear to respond to changes in the humidity deficit between the leaf and air and in this manner, regulated transpirational flux to some degree. Distinct differences in water transport efficiency were observed in the three species. Under nonlimiting soil water conditions, sorghum exhibited the greatest efficiency of water transport while under limiting soil moisture conditions, cotton appeared most efficient. Corn was the least efficient with respect to nonstomatal regulation of water use. Differences in drought tolerance among the three species are partially dependent on stomatal regulation of water loss, but efficiency of the water transport system may be more related to drought adaptation. This is particularly important since stomata of all three species did not respond to bulk leaf water status during a large portion of the growing season.

Full text

PDF
850

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Camacho-B S. E., Hall A. E., Kaufmann M. R. Efficiency and regulation of water transport in some woody and herbaceous species. Plant Physiol. 1974 Aug;54(2):169–172. doi: 10.1104/pp.54.2.169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hall A. E., Kaufmann M. R. Stomatal Response to Environment with Sesamum indicum. L. Plant Physiol. 1975 Mar;55(3):455–459. doi: 10.1104/pp.55.3.455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jordan W. R., Ritchie J. T. Influence of soil water stress on evaporation, root absorption, and internal water status of cotton. Plant Physiol. 1971 Dec;48(6):783–788. doi: 10.1104/pp.48.6.783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kanemasu E. T., Thurtell G. W., Tanner C. B. Design calibration and field use of a stomatal diffusion porometer. Plant Physiol. 1969 Jun;44(6):881–885. doi: 10.1104/pp.44.6.881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kaufmann M. R. Stomatal response of engelmann spruce to humidity, light, and water stress. Plant Physiol. 1976 Jun;57(6):898–901. doi: 10.1104/pp.57.6.898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Raschke K., Zeevaart J. A. Abscisic Acid Content, Transpiration, and Stomatal Conductance As Related to Leaf Age in Plants of Xanthium strumarium L. Plant Physiol. 1976 Aug;58(2):169–174. doi: 10.1104/pp.58.2.169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sanchez-Diaz M. F., Kramer P. J. Behavior of Corn and Sorghum under Water Stress and during Recovery. Plant Physiol. 1971 Nov;48(5):613–616. doi: 10.1104/pp.48.5.613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Turner N. C. Stomatal Behavior and Water Status of Maize, Sorghum, and Tobacco under Field Conditions: II. At Low Soil Water Potential. Plant Physiol. 1974 Mar;53(3):360–365. doi: 10.1104/pp.53.3.360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES