Skip to main content
NIST Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIST Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 12.
Published in final edited form as: MRS Adv. 2016 Apr 28;1(42):2867–2872. doi: 10.1557/adv.2016.289

Optical Fluorescence Microscopy for Spatially Characterizing Electron Transfer across a Solid-Liquid Interface on Heterogeneous Electrodes

Eric Choudhary 1, Jeyavel Velmurugan 2, James M Marr 2, James A Liddle 1, Veronika Szalai 1
PMCID: PMC5427636  NIHMSID: NIHMS826140  PMID: 28503329

Abstract

Heterogeneous catalytic materials and electrodes are used for (electro)chemical transformations, including those important for energy storage and utilization.1, 2 Due to the heterogeneous nature of these materials, activity measurements with sufficient spatial resolution are needed to obtain structure/activity correlations across the different surface features (exposed facets, step edges, lattice defects, grain boundaries, etc.). These measurements will help lead to an understanding of the underlying reaction mechanisms and enable engineering of more active materials. Because (electro)catalytic surfaces restructure with changing environments,1 it is important to perform measurements in operando. Sub-diffraction fluorescence microscopy is well suited for these requirements because it can operate in solution with resolution down to a few nm. We have applied sub-diffraction fluorescence microscopy to a thin cell containing an electrocatalyst and a solution containing the redox sensitive dye p-aminophenyl fluorescein to characterize reaction at the solid-liquid interface. Our chosen dye switches between a nonfluorescent reduced state and a one-electron oxidized bright state, a process that occurs at the electrode surface. This scheme is used to investigate the activity differences on the surface of polycrystalline Pt, in particular to differentiate reactivity at grain faces and grain boundaries. Ultimately, this method will be extended to study other dye systems and electrode materials.

INTRODUCTION

Background and Motivation

Catalysts are critical to supporting modern society and are used in petroleum refining, air and water pollution removal, and electron transfer reactions for energy applications including solar fuels among others.3 Amongst all types of catalysts, heterogeneous catalysts, which include nanoparticles, are an important class. Due to the intrinsic hetereogeneous nature of these materials, there are many different surface features available as binding sites for chemical species. It has long been understood that only a minority of the available surface sites are responsible for catalytic activity.4 Further, different exposed surface facets or features can have preferential catalytic activity towards one transformation over another.5, 6 In order to develop new catalysts with higher activity, it is first necessary to quantify the desired activity at the different surface features of a catalyst. This was first done by studying single crystals with known surface facets exposed.2, 7 However, single-crytals are not very accurate model systems for the dispersions of nanoparticles or heterogeneous electrodes used in practice. Ensemble scale characterization and testing of catalysts has led to structure/activity relationships,5, 6, 8, 9 although these measurements suffer from an inherent averaging of activity over all surface features/particles. Measurements have been made at the single nano-particle level and within domains of single catalyst particles to reduce the degree of ensemble averaging to smaller and smaller domains.10, 11 The challenge still remains to structually characterize and quantify catalytic activity at the single active site level on heterogeneous materials. One major challenge is due to the dynamic nature of active sites that structually rearrange during the catalytic cycle which necessitates using methods that are compatible with catalytic conditions (usually atmospheric pressure or solution phase).

Optical fluorescence microscopy is readily compatible with imaging through solution, and with sub-diffraction techniques such as photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM) and stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM), the spatial resolution can be improved by over an order of magnitude beyond the diffraction limit to under 10 nm.12 Instead of using an external stimulus to activate fluorescence as in PALM, a redox sensitive dye is used that gets activated upon electron transfer which occurs at the electrode surface. By imaging the locations of thousands of activated dyes, a spatial histogram can be built resolving the active features that can then be compared to structural characterization data from the same area. Again, because of surface reconstruction, the structural characterization has to take place under catalytic conditions. This makes vacuum techniques with high spatial resolution, such as scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) and scanning and transmission electron microscopy (SEM and TEM) unsuitable, although advancements are underway on integrating liquid cells into SEM and TEM instruments.13, 14

Platinum as Electrocatalyst

Pt is a widely used heterogeneous electrocatalyst for reactions such as the hydrogen oxidation and oxygen reduction reactions used in fuel cells. Fuel cells typically use electrodes impregnated with Pt nanoparticles where the active sites are very close together. This constraint makes using fluorescent microscopy to find active sites on nanoparticles unpractical as this would result in an ensemble average of the activity of part of or the whole particle due to the similarity between particle size and measurement resolution. To circumvent this limitation, we use annealed polycrystalline Pt electodes with grains larger than 100 nm to look for activity differences between various exposed facets, grain boundaries, defect sites, and other surface features. The activity for oxidation reactions is probed with p-aminophenyl fluorescein as the redox sensitive fluorophore. Before oxidation, the probe is non-fluorescent due to internal quenching from the aminophenyl group. Oxidation cleaves the quenching group to produce highly emissive fluorescein. By imaging the locations of many electrocatalytic turnovers, an activity map can be generated that can be correlated to a structural characterization of the same region both before and after the activity mapping. Even though the active sites can structurally rearrange at the atomic scale during catalysis, the much larger annealed Pt grains remain relatively unchanged as compared to their nanoparticle counterparts, thus making sequential characterization and correlation possible. Further, the grain boundaries can stabilize high-energy surface states predicted to be active for some catalytic transformations.15

Fluorescence Microscopy Applied to Catalysis

Sub-diffraction fluorescence microscopy relies on fitting the recorded point spread function of single emitters to a model. The localization uncertainty in this measurement is inversely proportional to the square root of the number of detected photons.16 To achieve a localization precision less than 5 nm, thousands of photons need to be detected. Although a single fluorophore can theoretically emit close to one billion photons s−1 at saturation, this rate of photon flux requires excitation powers far above the damage threshold of most samples. Commonly used experimental excitation power for single molecule microscopy is on the order of 1 kW cm−2 which corresponds to a fluorescent photon flux of approximately 10 000 photons per second. Under these conditions, the fluorophore must remain stationary for tens to hundreds of milliseconds in order to collect enough photons for accurate localization. If the fluorophore is to be imaged while bound to the active site without overlapping fluorescence from other fluorophores bound to nearby sites, this situation corresponds to a turnover frequency on the order of 10 Hz μm−2, a full 10 orders of magnitude slower than that of a diffusion limited catalytic system. Due to this fundamental mismatch between the timescales of fast catalytic systems and single-molecule fluorescent imaging systems, previous work has focused on catalysts with low inherent activity.17

A catalyst’s turnover rate is related to the binding energy of the different chemical species involved in the catalytic cycle. Inhibition of the reaction occurs when products bind too strongly; whereas weak binding results in insufficient surface coverage or insufficient reactant residence time. This behavior leads to the familiar volcano plot with the highest catalytic activity corresponding to binding energies such that the chemical species stay on the catalytic surface just long enough to react and then leave.18 Thus, in trying to study optimized (fast) catalysts with fluorescence micrscopy, the fluorophore probe must be engineered to spend an appreciable amount of time bound to or near the active site so that it can be detected.

Trapping Layer for Fluorescence Detection

To use fluorescence microscopy to characterize the active sites on a catalyst that does not bind the fluorophore strongly enough to keep its position fixed during the requisite measurment time, an additional modification can be made to the experimental setup to trap the activated fluorescent probe in the vicinity of the active site long enough to acquire an image. Such an approach has been pursued previously by covering the catalyst with a high surface area, porous silica layer that non-specifically adsorbs the fluorescent probe.17 By using a porous detection layer, the spatial resolution of the measurement is compromised because the probe can diffuse isotropically away from the active site before binding and being imaged. Thus, in order to maintain the highest spatial resolution, the porous detection layer should be as thin as possible. To address this issue, we use a detection layer based on the principles of ion-exchange chromatography in order to introduce specific, coulombic interactions between the anionic fluorescein probe and a polymer hydrogel containing cationic groups. In this system, the interaction strength can be modulated by changing the ionic strength of the electrolyte solution such that the probe has enough affinity to the stationary phase to be bound long enough to image but not so strong that charged species are excluding from reaching the electrode surface.19

EXPERIMENT

Our microfluidic measurement platform and reactor shown in Figure 1a is made by depositing thin metal films on a fused silica wafer using standard photolithography equipment. The working and counter electrodes are Pt. The reference electrode is Ag that has been anodized in hydrochloric acid to produce a Ag/AgCl reference electrode. A cationically-modified polyvinyl alcohol polymer and a low degree of cross-linking agent is coated on the working electrode to create the detection layer. The 6 mm wide microfluidic channel is enclosed with a cover glass spaced off the wafer surface with approximately 100 μm thick double sided tape, and a syringe pump is used to flow the 5 μmol L−1 p-aminophenyl fluorescein in 100 mmol L−1 phosphate buffer pH = 8.2 solution at 100 μL min−1. An inverted microscope fitted with a water immersion objective and the appropriate filters for fluorescein are used. The fluorophore excitation source is a 488 nm laser with optics to provide widefield illumination. Fluorescent photons are recorded on a scientific grade camera. A potentiostat is used to drive the three-electrode cell in the microfluidic reactor, which controls the electrocatalytic activity of the Pt working electrode. The working electrode is Pt that has been annealed in a tube furnace under H2/Ar to increase the grain size (Figure 1c). The fluorescence signal was recorded during cyclic voltammetry from −100 mV to +600 mV vs. a Ag/AgCl reference electrode while scanning at 10 mV s−1 (Figure 1d).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

a) Diagram showing the optical layout of an inversion microscope focused on a thin, microfluidic, electrochemical cell with a heterogeneous electrocatalyst as the working electrode. A solution containing a redox active dye is pumped through the cell. Initially the dye is internally quenched (blue star on right) until it undergoes a one-electron oxidation at the surface of the working electrode (green star on left). A laser is focused on the back focal plane of the objective lens to provide wide-field excitation illumination for the activated dye. The red-shifted fluorescence signal is collected by the objective lens and focused onto a camera. By collecting many fluorescent events over a period of time, a 2-D histogram can be made representing the surface activity with a spatial resolution of several nanometers. b) Close up schematic of the surface of the electrocatalyst covered with a hydrogel polymer as the detection layer. Fluorophores can penetrate this layer and reach the electrode surface to undergo oxidation. Activated fluorophores will be trapped near the active site due to interaction with the detection layer and allow for them to be imaged. c) A scanning electron micrograph of an annealed Pt film showing different grains, facets, and terraces. d) A plot of the fluorescence signal recorded from a solution containing p-aminophenyl fluorescein during cyclic potential sweeps of the Pt working electrode. The anodic scans are plotted as the green lines and cathodic scans in red. The inset shows the oxidative cleavage of the aminophenyl group from aminophenyl fluorescein to produce fluorescein.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluorescence microscopy can be a powerful measurement tool for studying catalytic systems because it is compatible with operation under catalytic solution conditions, has nanometer scale spatial resolution, and captures catalytic events with single-turnover sensitivity. Once fully optimized, our measurement platform will allow fluorescence microscopy to be applied to a much greater number of high-activity catalytic systems where the probe fluorophore would otherwise be adsorbed to the active site for too short of a time to be imaged. In addition to Pt, other heterogeneous electrocatalysts are well suited to this measurement method because an applied potential can be used to control the catalytic turnover rate such that probe molecules are activated at a low enough density to allow for individual point spread function fitting. Further, this principle can be applied to numerous additional ionic fluorescent probes for targeting other catalytic chemical transformations. More work remains to correlate catalytic activity maps with structural characterization of the underlying active sites. This knowledge will help elucidate the mechanisms through which catalysis occurs and eventually lead to the engineering and development the next generation of more active catalysts for a variety of commercial sectors.

Acknowledgments

Dr. Choudhary acknowledges support under the Cooperative Research Agreement between the University of Maryland and the National Institute of Standards and Technology Center for Nanoscale Science and Technology, Award 70NANB10H193, through the University of Maryland.

References

  • 1.Marković NM, Ross PN., Jr Surface Science Reports. 2002;45(4–6):117–229. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bard AJ. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2010;132(22):7559–7567. doi: 10.1021/ja101578m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ronge J, Bosserez T, Martel D, Nervi C, Boarino L, Taulelle F, Decher G, Bordiga S, Martens JA. Chemical Society Reviews. 2014;43(23):7963–7981. doi: 10.1039/c3cs60424a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Taylor HS. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical. Physical and Engineering Sciences. 1925;108(745):105–111. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lee SW, Chen S, Suntivich J, Sasaki K, Adzic RR, Shao-Horn Y. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 2010;1(9):1316–1320. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lee I, Morales R, Albiter MA, Zaera F. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008;105(40):15241–15246. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805691105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Joyner RW. In: Catalysis: Volume 5. Bond GC, Webb G, editors. Vol. 5. The Royal Society of Chemistry; 1982. pp. 1–47. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mostafa S, Behafarid F, Croy JR, Ono LK, Li L, Yang JC, Frenkel AI, Cuenya BR. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2010;132(44):15714–15719. doi: 10.1021/ja106679z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Vaarkamp M, Miller JT, Modica FS, Koningsberger DC. Journal of Catalysis. 1996;163(2):294–305. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sambur JB, Chen P. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry. 2014;65:395–422. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physchem-040513-103729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sambur JB, Chen T-Y, Choudhary E, Chen G, Nissen EJ, Thomas EM, Zou N, Chen P. Nature. 2016;530(7588):77–80. doi: 10.1038/nature16534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pastrana E. Nat Meth. 2011;8(1):46–46. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sutter EA, Sutter PW. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2014;136(48):16865–16870. doi: 10.1021/ja508279v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.de Jonge N, Ross FM. Nat Nano. 2011;6(11):695–704. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2011.161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Landau MV, Vidruk R, Vingurt D, Fuks D, Herskowitz M. Reviews in Chemical Engineering. 2014;30(4) [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Thompson RE, Larson DR, Webb WW. Biophysical Journal. 2002;82(5):2775–2783. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75618-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chen P, Zhou X, Andoy NM, Han K-S, Choudhary E, Zou N, Chen G, Shen H. Chemistry Society Reviews. 2014;43:1107. doi: 10.1039/c3cs60215j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nørskov JK, Rossmeisl J, Logadottir A, Lindqvist L, Kitchin JR, Bligaard T, Jónsson H. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2004;108(46):17886–17892. doi: 10.1021/jp047349j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hod I, Bury W, Gardner DM, Deria P, Roznyatovskiy V, Wasielewski MR, Farha OK, Hupp JT. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 2015;6(4):586–591. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES