Abstract
Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibition is an attractive strategy for cancer treatment. Several HSP90 inhibitors have shown promising effects in clinical oncology trials. However, little is known about HSP90 inhibition-mediated bladder cancer therapy. Here, we report a quantitative proteomic study that evaluates alterations in protein expression and histone post-translational modifications (PTMs) in bladder carcinoma in response to HSP90 inhibition. We show that 5 HSP90 inhibitors (AUY922, ganetespib, SNX2112, AT13387, and CUDC305) potently inhibited the proliferation of bladder cancer 5637 cells in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Our proteomic study quantified 518 twofold up-regulated and 811 twofold down-regulated proteins common to both AUY922 and ganetespib treatment. Bioinformatic analyses revealed that those differentially expressed proteins were involved in multiple cellular processes and enzyme-regulated signaling pathways, including chromatin modifications and cell death-associated pathways. Furthermore, quantitative proteome studies identified 14 types of PTMs with 93 marks on the core histones, including 34 novel histone marks of butyrylation, citrullination, 2-hydroxyisobutyrylation, methylation, O-GlcNAcylation, propionylation, and succinylation in AUY922- and ganetespib-treated 5637 cells. Together, this study outlines the association between proteomic changes and histone PTMs in response to HSP90 inhibitor treatment in bladder carcinoma cells, and thus intensifies the understanding of HSP90 inhibition-mediated bladder cancer therapeutics.
Introduction
Bladder cancer is the second most common genitourinary malignancy and the fourth most commonly diagnosed cancer in males in the United States1. Although there has been slow yet steady progress in the development of novel chemotherapeutic strategies for the management of advanced bladder cancer in the past two decades2–4, current chemotherapy confers only a modest survival benefit for patients with bladder cancer, with only a small number of patients achieving long-term disease control. Health care costs, which are significant for patients diagnosed with bladder cancer, are estimated to be $4 billion per year in the United States alone. From both clinical and economic perspectives, better treatment strategies are needed for these patients.
The exploration of innovative and effective cancer treatment options has resulted in a shift in the focus of drug development from cytotoxic compounds towards targeted therapeutics that act on specific molecular targets responsible for the malignant phenotype. One promising approach is the pharmacological targeting of heat shock protein 90 (HSP90)5–7. HSP90 is a molecular chaperone that plays an important role in protein folding and stability of client proteins5–7. Thus far, over 400 HSP90 client proteins have been identified (see http://www.picard.ch/downloads/Hsp90interactors.pdf.), and these client proteins are involved in a multitude of cellular processes (e.g., cell cycle control and proliferative/anti-apoptotic signaling) and many are activated in malignancy8.
HSP90 is overexpressed in many tumors, with expression levels correlating with prognosis9–11. Inhibition of HSP90 function leads to the degradation of multiple oncogenic client proteins involved in tumor progression, resulting in a loss of signal transduction, growth inhibition, anti-angiogenesis, and cell death; therefore, multiple signaling pathways are simultaneously blocked by HSP90 inhibition11, 12. Inhibition of HSP90 has resulted in significant antitumor effects in multiple cancer animal models13. It has even been demonstrated as a clinical relevant biomarker in urothelial carcinoma14. Therefore, over 19 HSP90 inhibitors have been manufactured for the treatment of cancer in recent years, and 100 clinical trials have been undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of HSP90 inhibitors in cancer patients15–19. Among the HSP90 inhibitors, AUY922 (luminespib)20, 21, ganetespib (STA9090)22, 23, SNX211224, 25, AT13387 (onalespib)26, and CUDC30527, 28 are novel, non-geldanamycin-derivative HSP90 inhibitors that have shown significant antitumor activity in a wide range of cancer cell lines, primary tumor cells, and animal cancer models6, 7, 29. Some of the preclinical activity has been observed in clinical oncology trials29, 30.
However, the effect and mechanism of HSP90 inhibitors in bladder carcinoma remains unclear. In the current study, we explored the efficacy of HSP90 inhibitors against bladder cancer. We demonstrate that AUY922, ganetespib, SNX2112, AT13387, and CUDC305 individually exerted a potent inhibitory effect on the growth and proliferation of human bladder cancer 5637 cells in a time- and dose-dependent manner. HSP90 inhibitors also had differential effects on cell survival and death between urothelial bladder carcinoma cells and human uroepithelial cells. Our quantitative proteomic analysis further revealed that both AUY922 and ganetespib independently induced dynamic changes in global protein expression including chromatin regulatory proteins, and that these alterations in protein levels were associated with 14 types of histone post-translational modifications (PTMs), suggesting a role for epigenetic modification in the antitumor activity of HSP90 inhibitors against bladder carcinoma. This study therefore expands our understanding of the role of HSP90 in bladder cancer and significantly furthers our mechanistic understanding of HSP90 inhibitor-mediated bladder cancer therapy.
Results
HSP90 inhibitors suppress cell proliferation and induce cell apoptosis in bladder cancer cells
To investigate the effect of HSP90 inhibitors (AUY922, ganetespib, SNX2112, AT13387, and CUDC305) on bladder cancer cell growth and proliferation, we chose the human epithelial bladder cancer cell line 5637, which is a commonly used cell line as a model for studying bladder carcinoma. The dose-response of HSP90 inhibitor inhibition of the growth of 5637 cell line was characterized in vitro using the MTS assay. All of the drugs (AUY922, ganetespib, SNX2112, AT13387, or CUDC305), studied at concentrations of 0.01 nM to 100 μM, caused dose-dependent inhibition of the proliferation of 5637 cells at 24, 48, or 72 h (Table 1). As shown in Fig. 1, the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of the 5 HSP90 inhibitors at 72 h ranged 0.64 to 200 nM in 5637 cells. These results indicate that these HSP90 inhibitors potently inhibit cell proliferation and induce cell toxicity in bladder cancer 5637 cells. Similar effects of the HSP90 inhibitors were observed in several other human bladder carcinoma cell lines, including RT112, RT4, T24, T24T, FLT3, SLT3, UMUC3, UMUC5, UMUC14 (data not shown), suggesting that it is a general antitumor activity for HSP90 inhibitors in human bladder cancer cells. However, 24-h treatment did not have a dramatic effect on cell viability, suggesting that extended exposure to HSP90 inhibitors is required for them to exert their activity on cell growth and death.
Table 1.
Treatment | 24 h* | 48 h* | 72 h* |
---|---|---|---|
AUY922 | 11.8 | 2.21 | 0.64 |
Ganetespib | 106 | 18.5 | 4.28 |
SNX2112 | 109 | 26.3 | 4.77 |
AT13387 | 16,500 | 9.56 | 5.16 |
CUDC305 | 10,600 | 344 | 200 |
*24-h IC50, 48-h IC50, or 72-h IC50; Unit: nmol/L.
To confirm the antitumor effect of HSP90 inhibitors in 5637 bladder cancer cells, we assessed cell viability by staining cells with live and dead cell-specific dyes using the Celigo® Image Cytometry System. Treatment with AUY922, ganetespib, SNX2112, and AT13387 significantly reduced cell survival as assessed by cell viability staining. The percentages of live cells for 5637 were 37.99, 32.27, 37.32, and 35.30% in the AUY922, ganetespib, SNX2112, and AT13387 groups, respectively, as compared with the untreated control group (Fig. 2A). Similar data for the HSP90 inhibitors were obtained from UMUC1 and UMUC3 bladder carcinoma cells via assessment of cell viability (data not shown).
However, the clinical use of HSP90 inhibitors will be linked to their safety, particularly the lack of toxicity in normal cells. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of HSP90 inhibitors on cell viability in a nontumorigenic human uroepithelial cell line, SV-HUC. The cell viability data showed that the percentages of viable cells for SV-HUC were 86.04, 78.08, 82.29, and 86.87% in the AUY922, ganetespib, SNX2112, and AT13387 groups, respectively (Fig. 2A), more than twofold higher than those for the bladder cancer cell line 5637 (p < 0.05), indicating a differential effect of the HSP90 inhibitors on cell viability between the human epithelial bladder carcinoma cell line 5637 and the human uroepithelial cell line SV-HUC. Similarly, HSP90 inhibitors had differential inhibitory activity in cell growth and death between the human bladder cancer cell lines UMUC1 and UMUC3 and the human uroepithelial cell line SV-HUC (data not shown).
To further verify the differential cytotoxic activity of HSP90 inhibitor between urothelial bladder carcinoma cells and nontumorigenic human uroepithelial cells, we performed caspase 3/7 assays measuring caspases 3 and 7 activity in apoptotic cells using the Celigo image cytometer. As seen in Fig. 2B, the percentages of apoptotic caspase 3/7 positive cells for 5637 cells were 51.53, 47.42, 54.46, and 31.66% in the AUY922, ganetespib, SNX2112, and AT13387 groups, respectively, whereas the percentages of caspase 3/7 positive cells for the control SV-HUC cells were 16.29, 18.32, 18.60, and 11.17% in the AUY922, ganetespib, SNX2112, and AT13387 groups, respectively, thus showing nearly threefold differences in percentages of caspase 3/7 positive cells between the bladder cancer cells and the control cells (p < 0.05). These results indicate that HSP90 inhibitors are much more potent at inducing apoptotic cell death in human urothelial bladder cancer 5637 cells than human uroepithelial SV-HUC cells. Similar differential effect data for triggering apoptosis by the HSP90 inhibitors were also obtained between bladder carcinoma UMUC3 cells and uroepithelial SV-HUC cells (data not shown). Since the cytotoxic activity of AUY922 and ganetespib was more potent than other HSP90 inhibitors examined in 5637 cells, we chose these HSP90 inhibitors for the following proteomic experiments.
HSP90 inhibitors stimulate dynamic changes of global protein expression in bladder carcinoma cells
To elucidate the mechanisms underlying the effect of HSP90 inhibitors on cell proliferation and cytotoxicity in bladder cancer cells, the whole cell proteome profiles of the HSP90 inhibitor-treated and -untreated 5637 cells were compared using quantitative proteomic studies. Differentially expressed proteins were identified and quantified by nanospray HPLC-MS/MS mass spectrometry. A total of 5481 non-redundant unique proteins were identified in both HSP90 inhibitor-treated and -untreated 5637 cells with 95% confidence. Of these, 4348, 4269, and 4615 were quantified in AUY922-treated, ganetespib-treated, and untreated cells, respectively. 3428 proteins were common to both HSP90 inhibitor-treated cells and -untreated cells.
Compared with the untreated control, there were 5170 differentially expressed proteins in AUY922-treated 5637 cells, including 2505 up-regulated proteins (997 ≥twofold up-regulated proteins) and 2665 down-regulated proteins (1301 ≥twofold down-regulated proteins). The fold changes ranged from 34.29 to −86.28, and 1405 of these proteins (both up- and down-regulated proteins) showed more than tenfold increased or decreased. For the ganetespib-treated 5637 cells, a total of 5187 proteins were differentially regulated; 2566 were up-regulated (1155 ≥twofold up-regulated) and 2621 down-regulated (1405 ≥twofold down-regulated). The fold changes ranged from 76.39 to −15.79, and 1524 of these proteins (both up- and down-regulated proteins) showed more than tenfold increased or decreased. 518 ≥twofold up-regulated proteins and 811 ≥twofold down-regulated proteins were common to both AUY922-treated and ganetespib-treated 5637 cells.
Functional classification of differentially expressed proteins in bladder cancer cells following HSP90 inhibitor treatment
To gain an initial understanding of the role and function of the identified proteins between the HSP90 inhibitor treated and untreated 5637 bladder cancer cells, we merged the protein datasets and used pathway software to provide a descriptive analysis. The functional correlation analysis of the differentially regulated proteins was done by database search using UniProt, Swiss-Prot, and the PANTHER classification systems (http://www.pantherdb.org). The categorization of differentially expressed proteins (≥2-fold up-regulated or down-regulated proteins) according to their molecular function and biological processes is shown in Fig. 3. These data are based on a compilation of proteins from the ganetespib-treated cell samples and are presented to demonstrate the range of molecular functions (Fig. 3A) and biological processes (Fig. 3B) represented by the identified proteins. Based on molecular function (Fig. 3A), the most general categories of ≥2-fold up-regulated proteins in ganetespib-treated cells were catalytic activity (33.8%), binding activity (29.6%), enzyme regulator activity (8.3%), structural molecule activity (7.8%), receptor activity (6.8%), transporter activity (6%), and nucleic acid binding transcription factor activity (5.5%). ≥Twofold down-regulated proteins in ganetespib-treated cells related to 12 biological processes (Fig. 3B), including metabolic process (34.7%), cellular process (22.9%), biological regulation (10.6%), localization (8.4%), cellular component organization or biogenesis (5.8%), developmental process (5%), response to stimulus (4.9%), and immune system process (3.5%).
A majority of the molecular functions and biological processes were affected in both AUY922-treated and ganetespib-treated bladder cancer cells. Although ganetespib caused more differentially expressed proteins (2560 ≥2-fold deregulation; 1155 ≥2-fold up-regulated and 1405 ≥2-fold down-regulated) than those caused by AUY922 (2298 ≥2-fold deregulation; 997 ≥2-fold up-regulated and 1301 ≥2-fold down-regulated proteins), the percentages of proteins in each category of the molecular function and biological process were similar between the ganetespib-treated (Fig. 3A and B) and AUY922-treated (data not shown) 5637 cells. We also compared the up-regulated proteins and the down-regulated proteins, and we showed that there were no significant differences for the percentages of proteins in each category of the molecular function and biological process between the AUY922-treated and ganetespib-treated 5637 cells (data not shown), suggesting that both AUY922 and ganetespib exert similar actions on functional categories in our cell model of bladder cancer.
Biological pathway analysis of differentially expressed proteins using KEGG and Ingenuity pathway analysis
Next, we performed molecular pathway analysis in order to explore which cellular signaling pathways were affected by HSP90 inhibition in bladder cancer cells. We used KEGG pathway analysis to identify the biological pathways of the proteins that were significantly differentially expressed (≥twofold up-regulated or down-regulated) in the HSP90 inhibitor-treated 5637 cells. Pathway analysis using the KEGG database by the DAVID bioinformatics resources tool showed that the down-regulated proteins were associated with multiple pathways, such as oxidative phosphorylation, cell cycle, glutathione metabolism, bladder cancer, notch signaling pathway, and all major annotated DNA metabolism pathways and nucleotide related processes, including pyrimidine and purine metabolism, RNA polymerase, spliceosome, basal transcription factors, nucleotide excision repair, and DNA replication (Table 2). We also performed the same analysis for HSP90 inhibitor up-regulated proteins, which were enriched in multiple different metabolism pathways including steroid biosynthesis, N-glycan biosynthesis, valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis, inositol phosphate metabolism, terpenoid backbone biosynthesis, pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis, and several protein degradation-related cellular processes, such as ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis, endocytosis, SNARE interactions in vesicular transport, adherens junctions, regulation of the actin cytoskeleton, the phosphatidylinositol signaling system, and the ErbB signaling pathway (Table 2).
Table 2.
Biological pathway | % | P-value |
---|---|---|
≥Twofold up-regulated proteins | ||
Steroid biosynthesis | 0.7 | 2.3 × 10−4 |
Regulation of actin cytoskeleton | 2.7 | 4.3 × 10−4 |
Ubiquitin mediated proteolysis | 2.1 | 1.1 × 10−3 |
Endocytosis | 2.2 | 1.6 × 10−3 |
Adherens junction | 1.2 | 3.8 × 10−3 |
N-Glycan biosynthesis | 0.8 | 1.4 × 10−2 |
SNARE interactions in vesicular transport | 0.8 | 1.5 × 10−2 |
Valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis | 0.4 | 2.1 × 10−2 |
Phosphatidylinositol signaling system | 1.0 | 2.3 × 10−2 |
ErbB signaling pathway | 1.1 | 2.5 × 10−2 |
Inositol phosphate metabolism | 0.8 | 3.1 × 10−2 |
Terpenoid backbone biosynthesis | 0.4 | 4.9 × 10−2 |
Pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis | 0.4 | 4.9 × 10−2 |
≥Twofold down-regulated proteins | ||
Oxidative phosphorylation | 2.5 | 1.1 × 10−8 |
Pyrimidine metabolism | 2.1 | 3.8 × 10−8 |
Purine metabolism | 2.2 | 4.6 × 10−5 |
Notch signaling pathway | 1.0 | 1.3 × 10−4 |
RNA polymerase | 0.8 | 1.9 × 10−4 |
Spliceosome | 1.8 | 2.7 × 10−4 |
Basal transcription factors | 0.6 | 2.1 × 10−2 |
Pathways in cancer | 2.7 | 2.6 × 10−2 |
Cell cycle | 1.3 | 3.4 × 10−2 |
Glutathione metabolism | 0.7 | 3.9 × 10−2 |
Nucleotide excision repair | 0.6 | 4.3 × 10−2 |
Bladder cancer | 0.6 | 4.8 × 10−2 |
DNA replication | 0.6 | 4.9 × 10−2 |
We also analyzed the differentially expressed proteins in ganetespib-treated 5637 cells using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) and showed that the primary pathways for the deregulated proteins (both ≥twofold up-regulated and down-regulated) are the protein ubiquitylation pathway, molecular transport, mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative phosphorylation, 3-phosphoinositide biosynthesis, cholesterol biosynthesis, triacylglycerol biosynthesis, actin cytoskeleton signaling, notch signaling, PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling, ErbB signaling, oxidative stress response, autophagy, nucleotide excision repair pathway, cell cycle regulation, and apoptosis signaling, which were largely consistent with the pathway analysis results using the KEGG database.
Antitumor effect of HSP90 inhibitors in bladder cancer cells is mediated via modulation of protein expression in cell death-associated signaling pathways
Given that HSP90 inhibitors have been shown to exert a variety of anticancer activities in different types of tumors and that both AUY922 and ganetespib induced cell growth inhibition and cell death in 5637 bladder cancer cells (Figs 1 and 2 and Table 1), we explored the mechanism underlying the effect of HSP90 inhibitors on cell proliferation and cytotoxicity. We performed proteomic analyses of the HSP90 inhibitor-responsive proteome for pathways involved in cell death, and identified the differentially expressed proteins related to cell death in the cell cycle, apoptosis, oxidative stress, autophagy, and DNA damage repair pathways in response to HSP90 inhibitor treatment. Table 3 shows part of the differentially expressed proteins involved in cell death in both AUY922- and ganetespib-treated 5637 cells. These include 48 proteins involved in cell cycle progression, 23 proteins associated with the apoptosis process, 41 proteins in various DNA damage repair pathways, and 16 proteins involved in reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and autophagy regulation. The functions and levels of the proteins in each pathway are listed in the table. Similar results were obtained in human urothelial bladder cancer UMUC3 cells treated with the HSP90 inhibitors (see Supplemental Table S1).
Table 3.
Accession no. | Protein description | Symbol | Protein function | Protein level (ppm) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Untreated | AUY922 | STA9090 | ||||
Regulation of Cell Cycle | ||||||
5921731 | G2/mitotic-specific cyclin-B2 | CCNB2 | Cyclin | 7.83 | 0 | 0 |
166214910 | Cyclin-C | CCNC | Cyclin | 22.01 | 0 | 0 |
1706232 | Cyclin-H | CCNH | Cyclin | 28.93 | 0 | 0 |
218511966 | Cyclin-K | CCNK | Cyclin | 37.59 | 0 | 6.13 |
74753368 | Cyclin-L1 | CCNL1 | Cyclin | 11.84 | 5.99 | 3.78 |
9296942 | Cyclin-T1 | CCNT1 | Cyclin | 12.87 | 0 | 0 |
334302921 | Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 | CDK1 | CDK | 293.60 | 169.77 | 167.49 |
116051 | Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 | CDK2 | CDK | 177.66 | 105.75 | 95.39 |
231726 | Cyclin-dependent kinase 3 | CDK3 | CDK | 132.74 | 82.66 | 69.90 |
1168867 | Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 | CDK4 | CDK | 174.73 | 62.40 | 58.64 |
4033704 | Cyclin-dependent kinase 5 | CDK5 | CDK | 170.65 | 86.34 | 109.52 |
266423 | Cyclin-dependent kinase 6 | CDK6 | CDK | 152.85 | 77.33 | 119.90 |
68067660 | Cyclin-dependent kinase 9 | CDK9 | CDK | 167.44 | 59.30 | 85.97 |
6226784 | Cyclin-dependent kinase 10 | CDK10 | CDK | 25.95 | 0 | 0 |
34978359 | Cyclin-dependent kinase 11B | CDK11B | CDK | 66.60 | 19.82 | 26.82 |
308153421 | Cyclin-dependent kinase 12 | CDK12 | CDK | 27.17 | 10.58 | 16.69 |
66774048 | Cyclin-dependent kinase 13 | CDK13 | CDK | 28.84 | 10.42 | 9.40 |
266425 | Cyclin-dependent kinase 16 | CDK16 | CDK | 81.63 | 31.77 | 28.66 |
17375734 | Cyclin-G-associated kinase | GAK | CDK | 2.38 | 2.40 | 0 |
205371737 | Anaphase-promoting complex subunit 4 | APC4 | Mitosis factor | 15.42 | 0 | 0 |
37537861 | Anaphase-promoting complex subunit 5 | APC5 | Mitosis factor | 4.13 | 0 | 0 |
294862527 | Anaphase-promoting complex subunit 7 | APC7 | Mitosis factor | 20.80 | 0 | 5.93 |
34395509 | Anaphase-promoting complex subunit 10 | APC10 | Mitosis factor | 67.34 | 0 | 0 |
37537763 | Cell division cycle protein 16 homolog | CDC16 | Mitosis factor | 20.09 | 0 | 11.46 |
254763423 | Cell division cycle protein 23 homolog | CDC23 | Mitosis factor | 15.65 | 0 | 0 |
12644198 | Cell division cycle protein 27 homolog | CDC27 | Mitosis factor | 7.56 | 0 | 0 |
52783153 | Mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint protein MAD1 | MD1L1 | Mitosis factor | 17.35 | 17.56 | 4.95 |
384872321 | Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A | CD2A2 | CDK inhibitor | 1038.10 | 2530.58 | 2611.11 |
19863257 | Cullin-1 | CUL1 | Positive regulator | 24.08 | 0 | 4.58 |
1709658 | Serine/threonine-protein kinase PLK1 | PLK1 | Positive regulator | 30.99 | 15.68 | 6.48 |
19858646 | DNA replication licensing factor MCM5 | MCM5 | Positive regulator | 67.89 | 30.05 | 62.93 |
2497824 | DNA replication licensing factor MCM6 | MCM6 | Positive regulator | 79.66 | 72.93 | 69.25 |
20981696 | DNA replication licensing factor MCM7 | MCM7 | Positive regulator | 99.62 | 78.89 | 84.01 |
76803807 | Origin recognition complex subunit 1 | ORC1 | Positive regulator | 7.23 | 3.66 | 0 |
8488999 | Origin recognition complex subunit 2 | ORC2 | Positive regulator | 16.19 | 5.46 | 0 |
8928268 | Origin recognition complex subunit 3 | ORC3 | Positive regulator | 4.38 | 0 | 4.99 |
6174924 | Origin recognition complex subunit 5 | ORC5 | Positive regulator | 21.48 | 21.73 | 16.34 |
25091097 | Double-strand-break repair protein rad21 homolog | RAD21 | Positive regulator | 167.81 | 134.84 | 129.52 |
13633914 | Mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 2 | SMAD2 | Positive regulator | 13.34 | 6.75 | 5.22 |
51338669 | Mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 3 | SMAD3 | Positive regulator | 51.29 | 29.66 | 41.80 |
135674 | Transforming growth factor β-1 | TGFB1 | Positive regulator | 23.96 | 16.16 | 0 |
132164 | Retinoblastoma-associated protein | RB | Positive regulator | 3.36 | 0 | 0 |
20455502 | Glycogen synthase kinase-3 β | GSK3B | Negative regulator | 14.83 | 15.01 | 16.92 |
1345590 | 14-3-3 protein β/α | YWHAB | Negative regulator | 468.41 | 640.51 | 606.65 |
1345593 | 14-3-3 protein η | YWHAH | Negative regulator | 215.22 | 333.06 | 375.55 |
48428721 | 14-3-3 protein γ | YWHAG | Negative regulator | 428.69 | 535.85 | 517.88 |
112690 | 14-3-3 protein θ | YWHAQ | Negative regulator | 483.03 | 565.95 | 522.11 |
52000887 | 14-3-3 protein ζ/δ | YWHAZ | Negative regulator | 699.13 | 771.74 | 696.15 |
Regulation of Apoptosis | ||||||
18202042 | Bcl-2-like protein 11 | B2L11 | Pro-apoptosis | 0 | 15.92 | 0 |
23396740 | Bcl-2-like protein 13 | B2L13 | Pro-apoptosis | 12.84 | 0 | 36.63 |
728945 | Apoptosis regulator BAX | BAX | Pro-apoptosis | 97.32 | 131.30 | 174.03 |
2493274 | Bcl-2 homologous antagonist/killer | BAK | Pro-apoptosis | 29.52 | 44.81 | 33.68 |
33860140 | Apoptosis-stimulating of p53 protein 2 | ASPP2 | Pro-apoptosis | 0 | 0 | 3.15 |
6685617 | Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 5 | MAP3K5 | Pro-apoptosis | 0 | 4.59 | 0 |
13431764 | Apoptosis-inducing factor 1, mitochondrial | AIFM1 | Pro-apoptosis | 246.76 | 259.10 | 301.42 |
74752283 | Apoptosis-inducing factor 2, mitochondrial | AIFM2 | Pro-apoptosis | 8.35 | 33.79 | 28.58 |
125987821 | Dynamin-1-like protein | DNM1L | Pro-apoptosis | 21.16 | 0 | 28.97 |
150417955 | Serine/threonine-protein phosphatase PGAM5 | PGAM5 | Necroptosis | 560.36 | 665.15 | 725.41 |
12231007 | Caspase-14 | CASPE | Caspase | 12.87 | 78.13 | 73.41 |
115612 | Calpain small subunit 1 | CPNS1 | Calpain-calcium | 81.34 | 94.07 | 79.55 |
317373596 | Calpain-2 catalytic subunit | CAN2 | Calpain-calcium | 63.03 | 71.18 | 101.52 |
33112239 | Calpain-7 | CAN7 | Calpain-calcium | 0 | 3.88 | 0 |
57012667 | Anamorsin | CPIN1 | Pro-survival | 9.98 | 0 | 11.38 |
126302556 | Calpastatin | ICAL | Pro-survival | 8.80 | 0 | 0 |
124297 | Interleukin-1α | IL1A | Pro-survival | 22.98 | 0 | 0 |
62906858 | Interleukin-1β | IL1B | Pro-survival | 46.31 | 0 | 0 |
125987833 | Interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase-like 2 | IRAK2 | Pro-survival | 14.95 | 0 | 0 |
18202671 | Myeloid differentiation primary response protein MyD88 | MYD88 | Pro-survival | 10.52 | 0 | 0 |
21542418 | Nuclear factor NF-κ-B p105 subunit | NFKB1 | Pro-survival | 9.65 | 6.51 | 3.67 |
125198 | cAMP-dependent protein kinase type II-α regulatory subunit | PRKAR2A | Pro-survival | 92.50 | 62.40 | 87.95 |
62906901 | Transcription factor p65 | RELA | Pro-survival | 16.96 | 11.43 | 12.89 |
Regulation of DNA Damage Repair | ||||||
73921676 | DNA-(apurinic or apyrimidinic site) lyase 2 | APEX2 | Base excision repair | 12.02 | 0 | 0 |
37999897 | Uracil-DNA glycosylase | UNG | Base excision repair | 29.85 | 20.13 | 22.70 |
206729922 | DNA-3-methyladenine glycosylase | MPG | Base excision repair | 20.90 | 0 | 0 |
251757259 | DNA ligase 3 | LIG3 | Base excision repair | 37.04 | 31.23 | 4.22 |
317373290 | DNA repair protein XRCC1 | XRCC1 | Base excision repair | 49.20 | 0 | 22.45 |
50401132 | Bifunctional polynucleotide phosphatase/kinase | PNKP | Base excision repair | 23.91 | 12.09 | 27.28 |
17380230 | Poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase 2 | PARP2 | Base excision repair | 26.71 | 16.21 | 24.37 |
123369 | High mobility group protein B1 | HMGB1 | Base excision repair | 506.98 | 381.08 | 214.84 |
296453081 | DNA repair protein complementing XP-C cells | XPC | Nucleotide excision repair | 3.31 | 0 | 3.78 |
12643730 | DNA damage-binding protein 1 | DDB1 | Nucleotide excision repair | 188.50 | 77.40 | 99.74 |
12230033 | DNA damage-binding protein 2 | DDB2 | Nucleotide excision repair | 29.17 | 14.76 | 33.28 |
119541 | TFIIH basal transcription factor complex helicase XPB subunit | ERCC3 | Nucleotide excision repair | 31.86 | 20.14 | 22.71 |
17380328 | General transcription factor IIH subunit 4 | GTF2H4 | Nucleotide excision repair | 74.15 | 40.92 | 30.76 |
1705722 | Cyclin-dependent kinase 7 | CDK7 | Nucleotide excision repair | 36.00 | 18.21 | 41.07 |
1706232 | Cyclin-H | CCNH | Nucleotide excision repair | 28.93 | 0 | 0 |
1708932 | CDK-activating kinase assembly factor MAT1 | MNAT1 | Nucleotide excision repair | 20.16 | 0 | 0 |
25091548 | Pre-mRNA-splicing factor SYF1 | XAB2 | Nucleotide excision repair | 87.42 | 51.60 | 45.71 |
108936013 | Cullin-4A | CUL4A | Nucleotide excision repair | 36.93 | 16.60 | 18.72 |
296439468 | Cullin-4B | CUL4B | Nucleotide excision repair | 20.47 | 0 | 7.78 |
1171032 | DNA mismatch repair protein Msh2 | MSH2 | Mismatch excision repair | 10.00 | 6.74 | 7.60 |
60392986 | DNA repair protein RAD50 | RAD50 | Homologous recombination | 71.21 | 60.04 | 67.70 |
17380137 | Double-strand break repair protein MRE11A | MRE11A | Homologous recombination | 39.59 | 4.45 | 20.07 |
74762960 | Nibrin | NBN | Homologous recombination | 41.30 | 8.35 | 18.85 |
116242745 | DNA endonuclease RBBP8 | RBBP8 | Homologous recombination | 3.47 | 3.51 | 0 |
166898077 | Crossover junction endonuclease MUS81 | MUS81 | Homologous recombination | 5.65 | 0 | 0 |
1705486 | Bloom syndrome protein | BLM | Homologous recombination | 4.40 | 0 | 5.01 |
38258929 | DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit | PRKDC | Non-homologous end-joining | 521.31 | 415.28 | 438.99 |
125731 | X-ray repair cross-complementing protein 5 | XRCC5 | Non-homologous end-joining | 582.87 | 439.11 | 495.12 |
125729 | X-ray repair cross-complementing protein 6 | XRCC6 | Non-homologous end-joining | 772.18 | 574.37 | 554.28 |
229462842 | Chromatin assembly factor 1 subunit A | CHAF1A | Chromatin structure and modification | 6.52 | 6.59 | 3.71 |
48428038 | Aprataxin | APTX | Editing and processing nuclease | 43.74 | 8.85 | 19.96 |
146325723 | E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase SHPRH | SHPRH | Ubiquitination and modification | 1.85 | 0 | 0 |
46577660 | Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 N | UBE2N | Ubiquitination and modification | 225.38 | 228.05 | 116.88 |
254763430 | 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine Triphosphatase | NUDT1 | Modulation of nucleotide pools | 15.81 | 0 | 0 |
347595814 | Deoxyuridine 5′-triphosphate nucleotidohydrolase, mitochondrial | DUT | Modulation of nucleotide pools | 49.43 | 37.51 | 14.10 |
269849759 | Cellular tumor antigen p53 | TP53 | Other related | 55.47 | 16.03 | 36.16 |
8928568 | Tumor suppressor p53-binding protein 1 | TP53BP1 | Other related | 53.70 | 6.39 | 45.04 |
68565701 | Telomere-associated protein RIF1 | RIF1 | Other related | 51.65 | 3.82 | 45.99 |
1705919 | Dual specificity protein kinase CLK2 | CLK2 | Other related | 12.48 | 6.31 | 21.36 |
55976619 | Pre-mRNA-processing factor 19 | PRPF19 | Other related | 463.44 | 331.38 | 373.65 |
ROS Generation | ||||||
134665 | Superoxide dismutase [Mn] | SODM | Antioxidant | 939.90 | 865.89 | 640.22 |
311033481 | Glutathione peroxidase 1 | GPX1 | Antioxidant | 230.12 | 232.85 | 87.51 |
269849565 | Glutathione peroxidase 8 | GPX8 | Antioxidant | 149.01 | 150.77 | 51.00 |
300680960 | Glutathione S-transferase θ-2 | GST2 | Antioxidant | 12.76 | 12.91 | 0 |
12643338 | Glutathione S-transferase κ-1 | GSTK1 | Antioxidant | 358.28 | 334.64 | 141.50 |
6016173 | Glutathione S-transferase ω-1 | GSTO1 | Antioxidant | 129.22 | 117.68 | 88.46 |
121746 | Glutathione S-transferase P | GSTP1 | Antioxidant | 177.96 | 120.04 | 67.68 |
14916998 | Glutathione reductase | GSHR | Reductase | 17.90 | 6.03 | 6.80 |
2506326 | Xanthine dehydrogenase/oxidase | XDH | Oxidase | 0 | 0 | 2.66 |
Regulation of Autophagy | ||||||
20178289 | Interferon α21 | IFNA21 | Autophagy | 0 | 0 | 18.80 |
74730233 | Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, catalytic subunit type 3 | PIK3C3 | Autophagy | 0 | 10.66 | 8.01 |
317373311 | Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase regulatory subunit β | PIK3R2 | Autophagy | 0 | 4.33 | 0 |
74762700 | Phosphoinositide 3-kinase, regulatory subunit 4 | PIK3R4 | Autophagy | 0 | 2.32 | 5.23 |
61212142 | Autophagy-related protein 3 | ATG3 | Autophagy | 0 | 10.04 | 0 |
17366828 | Autophagy-related protein 5 | ATG5 | Autophagy | 11.32 | 14.59 | 12.92 |
20140441 | Autophagy-related protein 13 | ATG13 | Autophagy | 0 | 0 | 6.87 |
ROS, reactive oxygen species.
Heat shock protein 90 inhibitor treatment alters the levels of chromatin regulatory enzymes and proteins in bladder cancer cells
Next, we quantified dynamic change in global protein abundance of the chromatin-modifying enzymes and proteins in HSP90 inhibitor-treated 5637 bladder cancer cells. Unexpectedly, we found that the protein levels of HDAC1, HDAC2, and HDAC3 in the deacetylation complexes of Mi-2/NuRD, CoREST, NcoR, SMRT, and Sin3 were all down-regulated in both AUY922- and ganetespib-treated cells. As seen in Table 4, treatment with AUY922 and ganetespib induced 2.3-fold and 1.6-fold down-regulation for HDAC1, 2.4-fold and 1.4-fold down-regulation for HDAC2, and 3.0-fold and 2.6-fold down-regulation for HDAC3, respectively. The levels of NAD-dependent protein deacetylase sirtuin-3 were also significantly reduced in response to AUY922 or ganetespib exposure (Table 4). In contrast, the levels of the lysine acetyltransferases HAT1, KAT6A, KAT7 and CREBBP were all elevated following HSP90 inhibitor induction (Table 4). In addition, the protein levels of the lysine demethylases KDM1A, KDM2A, and KDM4B for H3K4, H3K9, and H3K36 demethylation were decreased, while the levels of the lysine demethylases KDM5A and PHF2 for H3K4 and H3K9 demethylation were increased in HSP90 inhibitor-treated cells (Table 4). Furthermore, AUY922 or ganetespib up-regulated the expression of the lysine methyltransferases EHMT2, KMT2A, SUV39H1, NSD1, and EZH2 for H3K4, H3K9, H3K27, H3K36, and H4K20 methylation, but down-regulated the expression of the lysine methyltransferases SUV420H2, SETD2, and DOT1L for H3K36, H3K79, and H4K20 methylation in 5637 cells (Table 4). Interestingly, we found that the levels of 6 chromatin-remodeling proteins in the complexes of SWI/SNF and NuRD/Mi-2 were markedly altered in cells treated with both HSP90 inhibitors (Table 4). For instance, AUY922 and ganetespib caused 2.2-fold and 1.7-fold reduction for SMARCC1, 1.6-fold and 2.3-fold reduction for ACTL6A, 3.1-fold and 1.2-fold reduction for CHD3, and 3.1-fold and 2.2-fold reduction for CHD4, respectively. Finally, the levels of 2 histone-binding proteins and 18 proteins involved in transcriptional regulation were also altered in this cell model after AUY922 or ganetespib treatment. These 18 proteins include 2 proteins involved in transcription activation, 13 proteins acting as repressors or corepressors, and 3 proteins playing dual roles as activator and repressor or coactivator and corepressor in the regulation of gene expression. Similar proteomic data were obtained in UMUC3 bladder carcinoma cells treated with the HSP90 inhibitors (see Supplemental Table S2). These results suggest that the alterations in the levels of chromatin-modifying enzymes and proteins may contribute to the altered expression of proteins, including cell death associated proteins in HSP90 inhibitor-treated bladder cancer cells.
Table 4.
Accession no. | Protein description | Symbol | Complex | Protein function | Protein level (ppm) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Untreated | AUY922 | STA9090 | |||||
2498443 | Histone deacetylase 1 | HDAC1 | Mi-2/NuRD; CoREST; Sin3 | Lysine deacetylase | 374.75 | 163.45 | 235.90 |
68068066 | Histone deacetylase 2 | HDAC2 | Mi-2/NuRD; CoREST; Sin3 | Lysine deacetylase | 421.20 | 174.35 | 305.81 |
3334210 | Histone deacetylase 3 | HDAC3 | Mi-2/NuRD; NcoR/SMRT | Lysine deacetylase | 87.32 | 29.45 | 33.21 |
38258651 | NAD-dependent protein deacetylase sirtuin-3 | SIRT3 | HDAC | Lysine deacetylase | 23.42 | 15.80 | 0 |
3334209 | Histone acetyltransferase type B catalytic subunit | HAT1 | KATs | Lysine acetyltransferase | 52.03 | 67.69 | 67.84 |
215274095 | Histone acetyltransferase KAT6A | KAT6A | KATs | Lysine acetyltransferase | 1.55 | 1.57 | 5.32 |
68565854 | Histone acetyltransferase KAT7 | KAT7 | KATs | Lysine acetyltransferase | 35.68 | 36.10 | 52.34 |
116241283 | CREB-binding protein | CREBBP | KATs | Lysine acetyltransferase | 0 | 2.58 | 1.46 |
51315808 | Lysine-specific histone demethylase 1A | KDM1A | CoREST | Lysine demethylase | 32.90 | 22.19 | 20.85 |
38257795 | Lysine-specific demethylase 2A | KDM2A | KDMs | Lysine demethylase | 29.48 | 10.85 | 3.06 |
134047803 | Lysine-specific demethylase 4B | KDM4B | KDMs | Lysine demethylase | 2.84 | 0 | 0 |
215274124 | Lysine-specific demethylase 5A | KDM5A | KDMs | Lysine demethylase | 0 | 1.87 | 6.31 |
215274229 | Lysine-specific demethylase PHF2 | PHF2 | ARID5B | Lysine demethylase | 11.50 | 19.89 | 51.87 |
325511404 | Histone-lysine N-methyl-transferase EHMT1 | EHMT1 | KMTs | Lysine methyltransferase | 35.99 | 7.28 | 35.59 |
116241348 | Histone-lysine N-methyl-transferase EHMT2 | EHMT2 | KMTs | Lysine methyltransferase | 23.16 | 7.81 | 46.99 |
146345435 | Histone-lysine N-methyl-transferase 2A | KMT2A | KMTs | Lysine methyltransferase | 0.79 | 0 | 10.74 |
25091290 | Histone-lysine N-methyl-transferase SUV39H1 | SUV39H1 | KMTs | Lysine methyltransferase | 30.24 | 45.89 | 60.37 |
74727906 | Histone-lysine N-methyl-transferase SUV420H2 | SUV420H2 | KMTs | Lysine methyltransferase | 13.48 | 0 | 0 |
296452963 | Histone-lysine N-methyl-transferase SETD2 | SETD2 | KMTs | Lysine methyltransferase | 1.22 | 0 | 0 |
32469769 | Histone-lysine N-methyl-transferase NSD1 | NSD1 | KMTs | Lysine methyltransferase | 0 | 0 | 1.32 |
25090171 | Histone-lysine N-methyl-transferase DOT1L | DOT1L | KMTs | Lysine methyltransferase | 1.79 | 0 | 0 |
3334180 | Histone-lysine N-methyl-transferase EZH2 | EZH2 | PRC2/EED-EZH2 | Lysine methyltransferase | 12.52 | 8.45 | 28.58 |
209572723 | SWI/SNF complex subunit SMARCC1 | SMARCC1 | SWI/SNF | Chromatin remodeling | 191.65 | 88.41 | 115.76 |
238054318 | SWI/SNF-related matrix-associated actin-dependent regulator of chromatin subfamily D member 1 | SMARCD1 | SWI/SNF | Chromatin remodeling | 120.94 | 79.55 | 103.49 |
322510105 | SWI/SNF-related matrix-associated actin-dependent regulator of chromatin subfamily D member 2 | SMARCD2 | SWI/SNF | Chromatin remodeling | 93.84 | 77.15 | 80.30 |
23396463 | Actin-like protein 6A | ACTL6A | SWI/SNF | Chromatin remodeling | 319.42 | 198.33 | 140.81 |
88911273 | Chromodomain-helicase-DNA-binding protein 3 | CHD3 | Mi-2/NuRD | Chromatin remodeling | 28.03 | 9.45 | 23.10 |
311033360 | Chromodomain-helicase-DNA-binding protein 4 | CHD4 | Mi-2/NuRD | Chromatin remodeling | 263.87 | 85.70 | 120.80 |
1172846 | Histone-binding protein RBBP4 | RBBP4 | Mi-2/NuRD; Sin3 | Histone-binding protein | 300.44 | 163.13 | 200.65 |
2494891 | Histone-binding protein RBBP7 | RBBP7 | Mi-2/NuRD; Sin3 | Histone-binding protein | 315.09 | 185.37 | 234.10 |
226693612 | F-box-like/WD repeat-containing protein TBL1X | TBL1X | N-CoR/SMRT | Transcription activation | 10.79 | 5.46 | 12.32 |
23396874 | F-box-like/WD repeat-containing protein TBL1XR1 | TBL1XR1 | N-CoR/SMRT | Transcription activation | 66.65 | 12.26 | 41.48 |
84029319 | Transcriptional regulator Kaiso | ZBTB33 | N-CoR/SMRT | Transcriptional regulator | 9.27 | 4.69 | 0 |
226713806 | Nuclear receptor corepressor 2 | NCOR2 | N-CoR/SMRT | Corepressor | 6.17 | 0 | 0 |
6226623 | G protein pathway suppressor 2 | GPS2 | N-CoR/SMRT | Repressor | 9.52 | 0 | 0 |
74717977 | Histone deacetylase complex subunit SAP130 | SP130 | Sin3 | Repressor | 17.83 | 0 | 3.39 |
68053233 | Sin3 histone deacetylase corepressor complex component SDS3 | SDS3 | Sin3 | Corepressor | 37.98 | 0 | 21.67 |
37999759 | Paired amphipathic helix protein Sin3a | SIN3A | Sin3 | Repressor | 88.07 | 17.33 | 86.53 |
68053233 | Sin3 histone deacetylase corepressor complex component SDS3 | SUDS3 | Sin3 | Repressor | 37.98 | 0 | 21.67 |
6831678 | Histone deacetylase complex subunit SAP18 | SAP18 | Sin3 | Corepressor | 81.42 | 82.39 | 69.67 |
212276438 | Inhibitor of growth protein 1 | ING1 | Sin3 | Tumor suppressor | 14.76 | 0 | 8.42 |
74762776 | REST corepressor 1 | RCOR1 | CoREST | Corepressor | 25.85 | 0 | 0 |
6014741 | C-terminal-binding protein 1 | CTBP1 | CoREST | Corepressor | 106.17 | 21.49 | 16.15 |
50401198 | Methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 2 | MBD2 | Mi-2/NuRD | Repressor | 37.89 | 7.67 | 17.29 |
50400820 | Methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 3 | MBD3 | Mi-2/NuRD | Repressor | 10.70 | 0 | 0 |
259016275 | Metastasis-associated protein MTA1 | MTA1 | Mi-2/NuRD | Coactivator and corepressor | 174.23 | 35.26 | 69.57 |
29840793 | Metastasis-associated protein MTA2 | MTA2 | Mi-2/NuRD | Activator and repressor | 400.94 | 108.50 | 202.13 |
29840798 | Metastasis-associated protein MTA3 | MTA3 | Mi-2/NuRD | Corepressor | 110.10 | 15.92 | 11.96 |
HSP90 inhibition modulates post-translational modifications of histones in bladder carcinoma cells
Given that HSP90 inhibitors caused alterations in the levels of histone-modifying enzymes and protein expression in bladder cancer cells, and that histone modifications play essential roles in the control and regulation of gene expression, we investigated the effect of HSP90 inhibitors on histone post-translational modifications (PTMs) in 5637 cells.
To assess the impact of HSP90 inhibitors on site-specific PTMs of histones, we applied quantitative proteomics to profile histone PTMs in 5637 cells after AUY922 or ganetespib treatment, followed by protein sequence database searches for peptide identification and PTM site mapping. The diagram of Fig. 4 shows that a total of 14 different types of PTMs on the core histones were identified, including 7 recently identified histone PTM types, such as butyrylation, citrullination, O-GlcNAcylation, 2-hydroxyisobutyrylation, malonylation, propionylation, and succinylation. We also analyzed several other types of histone PTMs, including ADP-ribosylation, biotinylation, and crotonylation; however, we did not find these three types of histone PTMs in HSP90 inhibitor-treated 5637 cells (data not shown).
Furthermore, 47 PTM sites with 93 histone marks on the N-terminal tails of core histones were detected in AUY922- and ganetespib-treated 5637 cells, including 16 acetyl (ac) marks, 2 butyryl (bu) marks, 6 citrulline (ci) marks, 8 dimethyl (me2) marks, 1 2-hydroxyisobutyryl (hib) mark, 21 monomethyl (me1) marks, 1 malonyl (ma) mark, 3 O-GlcNAcyl (og) marks, 5 oxidation (ox) marks, 3 phosphoryl (ph) marks, 9 propionyl (pr) marks, 4 succinyl (su) marks, 4 trimethyl (me3) marks, and 10 ubiquityl (ub) marks (Fig. 4 and Table 5). To our knowledge, 34 of these histone marks have not been reported in any species in the past, including H2BK34ac, H4K20bu, H2AR88ci, H3R42ci, H3R116ci, H4R23ci, H4R55ci, H4R92ci, H4K20hib, H2AD90me1, H2AE91me1, H2AK119me1, H2BE93me1, H3R40me1, H3R42me1, H3R83me3, H4D24me1, H4E52me1, H4E53me1, H4R55me2, H2AS122og, H3T45og, H4T30og, H3Y41ox, H4Y51ox, H2BT96ph, H2AK118pr, H2AK119pr, H2BK46pr, H2BK108pr, H3K122pr, H4K20pr, H4K20su, and H4K79ub31–33.
Table 5.
Histone PTM type | Total histone mark | Novel histone mark |
---|---|---|
Acetylation | 16 | 1 |
Butyrylation | 2 | 1 |
Citrullination | 6 | 6 |
2-Hydroxyisobutyrylation | 1 | 1 |
Malonylation | 1 | 0 |
Mono-methylation | 21 | 9 |
Di-methylation | 8 | 1 |
Tri-methylation | 4 | 1 |
O-GlcNAcylation | 3 | 3 |
Oxidation | 5 | 2 |
Phosphorylation | 3 | 1 |
Propionylation | 9 | 6 |
Succinylation | 4 | 1 |
Ubiquitylation | 10 | 1 |
Intriguingly, we observed that PTM sites were differentially identified in core histones. For example, we only detected acetylation but not methylation on 9 histone sites (H2BK34ac, H3K9ac, H3K14ac, H3K18ac, H3K23ac, H3K56ac, H4K12ac, H4K16ac and H4K79ac), whereas only mono-methylation but not acetylation was detected on 15 histone sites (H2AD90me1, H2AE91me1, H2BK46me1, H2BE93me1, H2BK108me1, H3K36me1, H3K37me1, H3R40me1, H3R42me1, H3R83me1, H4R23me1, H4D24me1, H4K31me1, H4E52me1, and H4E53me1). Moreover, we showed that multiple PTMs were detected on single histone sites, including H2AK118, H2AK119, H2BK46, H2BK108, H3K27, H3K36, H3K37, H3Y41, H3R42, H3K56, H3K79, H3R83, H3K122, H4K20, H4R23, H4K31, H4R55, and H4K79 (Fig. 4). Representative spectra of modified histone peptides are shown in Fig. 4C–F, including the spectra for peptides of histone H4K20bu, H4R23me3, H2BK46pr, and H3K122su. In addition, some selected PTM sites identified on the core histones and the corresponding modified peptide sequences in HSP90 inhibitor-treated 5637 cells are listed in Table 6.
Table 6.
Modified histone site | Modified peptide sequence |
---|---|
Acetylation site | |
H2BK34 | _KRKRSRK(ac)ESYSIY_ |
H3K9 | _TKQTARK(ac)STGGKA_ |
H3K14 | _RKSTGGK(ac)APRKQL_ |
H3K18 | _GGKAPRK(ac)QLATKA_ |
H3K23 | _RKQLATK(ac)AARKSA_ |
H3K27 | _ATKAARK(ac)SAPATG_ |
H3K56 | _EIRRYQK(ac)STELLI_ |
H3K79 | _EIAQDFK(ac)TDLRFQ_ |
H3K122 | _RVTIMPK(ac)DIQLAR_ |
H4K12 | _GGKGLGK(ac)GGAKRH_ |
H4K16 | _LGKGGAK(ac)RHRKVL_ |
H4K20 | _GAKRHRK(ac)VLRDNI_ |
Butyrylation site | |
H4K20 | _GAKRHRK(bu)VLRDNI_ |
Citrullination site | |
H4R23 | _RHRKVLR(ci)DNIQGI_ |
H4R55 | _LIYEETR(ci)GVLKVF_ |
2-Hydroxyisobutyrylation site | |
H4K20 | _GAKRHRK(hib)VLRDNI_ |
Malonylation site | |
H3K122 | _RVTIMPK(ma)DIQLAR_ |
Mono-methylation site | |
H2AD90 | _QLAIRND(me1)EELNKL_ |
H2BK108 | _LPGELAK(me1)HAVSGG_ |
H3K27 | _ATKAARK(me1)SAPATG_ |
H3K36 | _PATGGVK(me1)KPHRYR_ |
H3K37 | _ATGGVKK(me1)PHRYRP_ |
H3R40 | _GVKKPHR(me1)YRPGTV_ |
H3R42 | _KKPHRYR(me1)PGTVAL_ |
H3K79 | _EIAQDFK(me1)TDLRFQ_ |
H3R83 | _DFKTDLR(me1)FQSSAV_ |
H3K122 | _RVTIMPK(me1)DIQLAR_ |
H4K20 | _GAKRHRK(me1)VLRDNI_ |
H4R23 | _RHRKVLR(me1)DNIQGI_ |
H4D24 | _RHRKVLRD(me1)NIQGI_ |
H4K31 | _NIQGITK(me1)PAIRRL_ |
H4E52 | _ISGLIYE(me1)ETRGVL_ |
H4E53 | _SGLIYEE(me1)TRGVLK_ |
H4D85 | _KTVTAMD(me1)VVYALK_ |
Di-methylation site | |
H3K27 | _ATKAARK(me2)SAPATG_ |
H3K36 | _PATGGVK(me2)KPHRYR_ |
H3K37 | _ATGGVKK(me2)PHRYRP_ |
H3K79 | _EIAQDFK(me2)TDLRFQ_ |
H4K20 | _GAKRHRK(me2)VLRDNI_ |
H4R55 | _LIYEETR(me2)GVLKVF_ |
Tri-methylation site | |
H3K36 | _PATGGVK(me3)KPHRYR_ |
H4K20 | _GAKRHRK(me3)VLRDNI_ |
H4R23 | _RHRKVLR(me3)DNIQGI_ |
O -GlcNAcylation site | |
H3T45 | _HRYRPGT(og)VALREI_ |
Oxidation site | |
H2BY42 | _SYSIYVY(ox)KVLKQV_ |
H3Y41 | _VKKPHRY(ox)RPGTVA_ |
H4Y51 | _RISGLIY(ox)EETRGV_ |
H4Y88 | _TAMDVVY(ox)ALKRQG_ |
Phosphorylation site | |
H2BT96 | _TSREIQT(ph)AVRLLL_ |
Propionylation site | |
H2AK95 | _NDEELNK(pr)LLGKVT_ |
H2AK118 | _QAVLLPK(pr)KTESHH_ |
H2AK119 | _AVLLPKK(pr)TESHHK_ |
H2BK46 | _YVYKVLK(pr)QVHPDT_ |
H3K56 | _EIRRYQK(pr)STELLI_ |
H3K122 | _RVTIMPK(pr)DIQLAR_ |
H4K20 | _GAKRHRK(pr)VLRDNI_ |
H4K31 | _NIQGITK(pr)PAIRRL_ |
Succinylation site | |
H3K122 | _RVTIMPK(su)DIQLAR_ |
H4K20 | _GAKRHRK(su)VLRDNI_ |
Ubiquitylation site | |
H2AK118 | _QAVLLPK(ub)KTESHH_ |
H2BK46 | _YVYKVLK(ub)QVHPDT_ |
H2BK108 | _LPGELAK(ub)HAVSGG_ |
H3K56 | _EIRRYQK(ub)STELLI_ |
H3K79 | _EIAQDFK(ub)TDLRFQ_ |
H3K122 | _RVTIMPK(ub)DIQLAR_ |
H4K31 | _NIQGITK(ub)PAIRRL_ |
H4K77 | _TYTEHAK(ub)RKTVTA_ |
H4K79 | _TEHAKRK(ub)TVTAMD_ |
To validate the histone PTM results from the quantitative HPLC/MS/MS analysis, we performed western blot analysis with sequence-specific antibodies to examine the dynamic change of histone modification sites upon HSP90 inhibitor treatment of 5637 cells. Consistent with the data obtained in the HPLC/MS/MS approach, our western blot data showed clear increases in the global acetyl-histone H3 and H4, as well as specific histone modifications including H3K18ac, H3K27ac, H3K79me1, H3K79me2, H4K12ac, and H4K20me3 following exposure to AUY922, ganetespib, and SNX2112 (Fig. 5). Similar results were also obtained in UMUC3 human bladder carcinoma cells induced with the same HSP90 inhibitors (data not shown). However, our experiment showed that the levels of H3K23ac were reduced in 5637 cells in response to AUY922 or ganetespib (data not shown). In addition, because some histone marks such as H3K4me and H4K8ac were not identified in HSP90 inhibitor-treated 5637 cells due to the fact that the peptide fragments containing these histone marks were too short to be detected by proteomics, we assessed the PTMs of H3K4 and H4K8 in our cell model systems by immunoblotting. Unexpectedly, we found marked increases in H3K4me1 and H3K4me3 in the three HSP90 inhibitor-treated 5637 cells (Fig. 5A). Interestingly, elevated levels of H3K4me2 and H4K8ac were observed only in HSP90 inhibitor-treated UMUC3 but not in 5637 cells (data not shown). Collectively, the profiles of histone PTMs in response to HSP90 inhibitor treatment indicate a marked impact of HSP90 inhibition on epigenetic modifications in bladder cancer cells.
Discussion
Although HSP90 inhibitors have been evaluated on multiple regimens in different types of tumors, there is no HSP90 inhibitor currently in clinical trial for urinary bladder cancer. In the present study, we provide evidence supporting in vitro antitumor activity of the HSP90 inhibitors AUY922, ganetespib, SNX2112, AT13387, and CUDC305 in human bladder carcinoma cells. We also showed that HSP90 inhibitors have differential cytotoxic activity between urothelial bladder cancer cells and nontumorigenic human uroepithelial cells. Further, our quantitative proteomic analysis identified 5481 proteins, among which 518 proteins were twofold up-regulated and 811 proteins were twofold down-regulated in both AUY922- and ganetespib-treated 5637 cells. The subsequent bioinformatic analysis revealed that those quantifiable proteins were mainly involved in cellular metabolism and cell death-associated processes, including cell cycle progression, apoptotic cell death, DNA damage repair, oxidative stress, and autophagy regulation (Table 3), suggesting that those proteins in these pathways are involved in HSP90 inhibitor-induced cell death in 5637 bladder carcinoma cells.
Regulation of protein abundance in the cell is mainly through transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms. Chromatin modification is one of the major epigenetic mechanisms34, 35, encompassing ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling and various histone modifications36. Chromatin modifications modulate transcription by altering the accessibility of DNA to the regulatory transcription machinery proteins, and binding of regulatory proteins (e.g., transcription factors or repressors) to the promoter sequence of a gene resulting in activation or blocking of transcription.
In the present study, we detected 14 different types of histone PTMs on the N-terminal tails of core histones in AUY922- and ganetespib-treated 5637 cells, suggesting a key role for HSP90 in modulating dynamics of multiple PTMs at N-terminal tails. Histone modification in the N-terminal region has been called the “histone code” or “epigenetic code”37, which plays a central role in chromatin remodeling and gene transcriptional regulation. Herein, 47 PTM sites with 93 histone marks were identified in HSP90 inhibitor-treated 5637 cells, and surprisingly, 34 novel histone marks detected in this study have not been reported in any species before, suggesting profound epigenetic modulation by HSP90 inhibitors in bladder cancer cells31–33. For instance, 16 acetyl marks on the N-terminal tails of core histones were detected in AUY922- and ganetespib-treated 5637 cells, most of which are significantly increased (Fig. 5). Histone acetylation relaxes chromatin condensation and exposes DNA to transcription factor binding, leading to an increase in gene expression36. Unexpectedly, we also observed that the acetylation levels of several acetyl marks were not increased (e.g., H4K8ac) or even were decreased (e.g., H3K23ac) after HSP90 inhibitor treatment, which may impact histone code-mediated epigenetic regulation of gene expression, leading to protein level changes. Moreover, in both AUY922- and ganetespib-treated 5637 cells, we identified the methylation of H3K4, H3K36, H3K79, H3K27, and H4K20. The methylation of H3K4, H3K36, and H3K79 has been shown to be involved in transcriptional activation, whereas the methylation of H3K27 and H4K20 is involved in transcriptional repression36.
In addition to histone lysine acetylation and methylation, we also detected several types of less well understood histone lysine coenzyme A-dependent acylations, including butyrylation, 2-hydroxyisobutyrylation, malonylation, propionylation, and succinylation31, 32, 38. Similar to acetylation, these acylations neutralize the positive charge of lysine, ostensibly weakening histone-DNA contacts. Although additional work is needed to ascertain the biological relevance of this extended family of histone lysine acylations, it may be that lysine acylation is a general means to facilitate DNA access for processes such as gene transcription and DNA replication and repair.
Besides histone PTMs, dynamic remodeling of chromatin by ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling enzymes/complexes is also involved in regulating gene expression. In the current study, we found that HSP90 inhibition caused alterations in expression of multiple proteins in the chromatin-remodeling complexes, such as SWI/SNF and NuRD/Mi-2, suggesting a role for chromatin remodeling in gene expression in HSP90 inhibitor-treated 5637 cells. It is well-documented that chromatin remodelers are involved in disassembly and reassembly of chromatin structures, leading to turning on or turning off gene transcription39, 40. Recent studies further suggest that chromatin-remodeling systems are universally associated with enhancers and transcriptional response elements, thereby directly participates in the transcriptional regulation of gene expression40–43. Although the mechanisms underlying the effect of HSP90 inhibitors on epigenetic modifications in bladder tumor cells are not understood, a growing body of evidence shows that pharmacological inhibition of HSP90 induces chromatin modifications indirectly through ubiquitin-dependent proteasomal degradation of chromatin-remodeling proteins and histone-modifying enzymes, hence altering the chromatin structure and histone code in cells44, 45.
Combining our data discussed above, we propose a possible mechanism by which HSP90 inhibitors cause bladder cancer cell growth arrest and cell death as shown in Fig. 6. In this model, HSP90 inhibitors selectively bind to HSP90, thereby inhibiting its chaperone function and promoting the degradation of oncogenic signaling proteins involved in tumor cell proliferation and survival. HSP90 inhibitors also modulate activation or repression of gene expression directly via regulation of several chromatin-remodeling proteins and histone-modifying enzymes45–47, or indirectly via degradation of transcriptional regulators and co-regulators, thus altering changes in the levels and activities of proteins involved in the intracellular signaling pathways of cell cycle progression, apoptotic cell death, DNA damage repair, oxidative stress, autophagy regulation, and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, which are all associated with cell death. In the proposed signaling pathways depicted here (Fig. 6), AUY922 and ganetespib induce cell cycle arrest and apoptotic cancer cell death; cell cycle blockade not only causes cancer cell growth arrest, but prolonged cell cycle arrest also triggers cell suicide, usually in the form of apoptosis. In addition, the HSP90 inhibitors increase DNA damage directly or indirectly through ROS production, which in turn promotes apoptosis. On the other hand, AUY922 and ganetespib mediate cancer cell death via inducing autophagy or indirectly via ROS-mediated cell death through autophagy. Finally, HSP90 inhibition also causes accumulation of unfolded or misfolded proteins in the ER leading to ER stress and further triggering bladder carcinoma cell apoptosis48, 49. Because HSP90 inhibitors target cell survival and cell death through multiple closely related but distinct mechanisms, they may act collaboratively or synergistically to promote the apoptotic death of bladder cancer cells through these signaling pathways and their downstream molecular events.
In conclusion, our data demonstrate that HSP90 inhibitors exhibit potent antitumor activity against bladder carcinoma cells. Moreover, HSP90 inhibitors have differential effects on cell survival and death between human urothelial bladder cancer cells and nontumorigenic human uroepithelial cells. Proteomic data analyses further revealed alterations in protein expression involved in multiple biological functions and cell death-associated pathways in AUY922- and ganetespib-treated 5637 cells. More importantly, we found that both HSP90 inhibitors induced cytotoxicity and changes of protein expression in association with enhanced histone PTMs as well as altered levels of chromatin regulatory proteins in bladder cancer cells, reinforcing the chromatin modification activity of AUY922 and ganetespib through their HSP90 inhibition function, which subsequently impacts histone code-mediated epigenetic regulation45–47. Furthermore, our study identified 34 novel histone marks, and less than 5 hundred histone marks are detected within the first 50 years of histone biology (until 2015)31, 32. Thus, identification of the 34 new histone marks in this study is a significant advance to our understanding of “histone code”37. Given the known roles of histone marks in chromatin structure and function, the newly identified histone marks are likely to possess functions in transcriptional regulation and cellular metabolism. More studies may need to focus on these PTM marks in core histones, to explore the epigenetic mechanism of HSP90 inhibitor-mediated treatment of bladder tumors. Better understanding of the epigenetics underlying the HSP90 inhibition in bladder cancer may lead to the development of new treatment strategies with HSP90 inhibitors in combination with other drugs targeted at modulating relevant cell growth and death pathways50, 51 or at inhibiting regulatory enzymes in PTMs52, 53, augmenting HSP90 inhibition-mediated bladder cancer therapeutics.
Methods
Chemicals and reagents
The CellTiter 96 Aqueous ONE Solution Cell Proliferation Assay was purchased from Promega Corp. (Madison, WI, USA). NVP-AUY922 (AUY922) (>99% purity) was from Selleckchem.com (Houston, TX, USA). Ganetespib (STA9090) (98.79% purity) and SNX2112 (98% purity) were purchased from ApexBio (Houston, TX, USA). AT13387 (>98%) was from MedChem Express (Princeton, NJ, USA), CUDC305 (>98% purity) was from AbMole BioScience (Houston, TX, USA), and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). AUY922, ganetespib, SNX2112, AT13387, and CUDC305 were dissolved in DMSO separately and stored at −20 °C. Polyclonal antibodies against histone H3, H4, H3K4me3, H3K18ac, and H4K12ac were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA). Monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies against acetyl-histone H3, acetyl-histone H4, and H3K27ac were bought from EMD Millipore Corporation (Billerica, MA, USA). Monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies against histone H3K4me1, H3K4me2, H3K23ac, H3K79me1, H3K79me2, H4K8ac, and H4K20me3 were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). Restore Western Blot Stripping Buffer was from Thermo Scientific (Rockford, IL, USA). All other reagents were from Sigma-Aldrich.
Cell culture and cell proliferation assay
The human bladder cancer cell line 5637 (HTB-9) was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). The cell line was grown in minimum essential medium (MEM), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 50 IU/ml penicillin, and 50 μg/ml streptomycin (Life Technologies; Carlsbad, CA, USA), at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2.
The anti-proliferative effects of AUY92, ganetespib, SNX2112, AT13387, and CUDC305 were assessed using an MTS (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium)-based assay (Promega), as previously described54. In brief, 5637 bladder carcinoma cells (5 × 103 cells/well) were evenly seeded in 96-well plates with 100 µl of medium for 24 h, and then treated with AUY922, ganetespib, SNX2112, AT13387, or CUDC305 at the indicated concentrations (0, 0.01 nM, 0.1 nM, 1 nM, 10 nM, 100 nM, 1 μM, 10 μM, and 100 μM) in 100 μl of medium for 24, 48, or 72 h. At the end of incubation, 20 μl of CellTiter 96 Aqueous One Solution reagent were added to each well of the assay plates containing the treated and untreated cells in 200 μl of culture medium, and the plates were incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 2 h. The optical density at 490 nm was determined using a 96-well iMarkTM Microplate Reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories; Hercules, CA, USA). Proliferation rates were calculated from the optical densities of the HSP90 inhibitor-treated cells relative to the optical density of DMSO-treated control cells with no HSP90 inhibitor exposure (control value, 100%). The half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values for AUY922, ganetespib, SNX2112, AT13387, and CUDC305 at 24, 48, and 72 h in the 5637 cell line were calculated using GraphPad Prism version 6.01 (GraphPad Software; La Jolla, CA, USA) software. IC50 was considered as the drug concentration that decreases the cell count by 50%.
Celigo cell survival assays
The 5637 and SV40-transformed human uroepithelial cells (SV-HUC) were trypsinized and placed in 96-well plates (Greiner Bio One, Monroe, NC, USA; Cat# 655090) at a concentration of 1 × 104 cells per well, and the cells were incubated overnight at 37 °C. The HSP90 inhibitors AUY922 (10 nM), ganetespib (10 nM), SNX2112 (100 nM), or AT13387 (100 nM) were added to those wells to a final volume of 200 μl per well. Cells were simultaneously stained with a mixture of calcein AM, propidium iodide, and Hoechst 33342 reagents for respective staining of live, dead, and all cells following the manufacturer’s protocol (Nexcelom Bioscience LLC, Lawrence, MA, USA; Cat# CSK-V0001-1), and cell viability was quantified with Celigo® S Imaging Cell Cytometer. Live and dead cell counts as well as the percentage of viable cells were calculated with the Celigo software program.
To assess the effect of HSP90 inhibitors on cell death via apoptosis, we measured the activity of caspases 3 and 7 in HSP90 inhibitor-induced apoptotic cells using the Celigo image cytometer. 5637 and SV-HUC cells were seeded overnight at 1 × 104 cells per well. Cells were incubated with AUY922 (10 nM), ganetespib (10 nM), SNX2112 (100 nM), or AT13387 (100 nM) for 48 h, and then stained with Nexcelom ViaStainTM Caspase 3/7 reagent (Nexcelom, Cat# CSK-V0002-1) and Hoechst 33342 (Nexcelom, Cat# CS1-0128), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Staurosporine (10 μM) was used as a positive control. Apoptotic caspase 3/7 positive cells were identified by Celigo imaging cytometry, and live and dead cell counts as well as the percentage of caspase 3/7 positive cells were calculated with the Nexcelom Celigo software.
Preparation of protein extraction, separation of proteins, and in-gel tryptic digestion
The 5637 bladder tumor cells were treated with AUY922 (100–250 nM) or ganetespib (0.5–1 μM) for 24 h, the monolayer cells were rinsed 3 times with cold PBS, and cells were then harvested. Total protein extraction from cell pellets was prepared by the following method. In brief, cell pellets were lysed in 0.4 ml lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM Na2EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1% Triton X-100, protease inhibitor cocktail pill). After cells were lysed, 50 μl of 10% SDS and 50 μl of 1 M DTT were added into the mixture followed by incubation at 95 °C for 10 min. The extraction was then sonicated and centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 10 min. Supernatants were collected and stored at −80 °C for further analysis. The protein concentration of the supernatants was determined by a BCA™ Reducing Reagent compatible assay kit (Thermo Scientific; Rockford, IL, USA).
Equal amounts of protein (130 μg) from each sample were fractioned by separation on a NuPAGE 4–12% Bis-Tris Gel (Life Technologies; Grand Island, NY, USA). Sixteen gel fractions from each lane representing one sample were treated with DTT for reduction, then iodoacetamide for alkylation, and further digested by trypsin in 25 mM NH4HCO3 solution. The digested protein was extracted, and the extracted peptides were dried and reconstituted in 20 μl of 0.1% formic acid before nanospray HPLC-MS/MS analysis was performed.
Nanospray HPLC-MS/MS analysis
Sixteen tryptic peptide fractions from one cell sample were analyzed sequentially using a Thermo Scientific Q-Exactive hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer equipped with a Thermo Dionex UltiMate 3000 RSLCnano System. Tryptic peptide samples were loaded onto a peptide trap cartridge at a flow rate of 5 μl/min. The trapped peptides were eluted onto a reversed-phase 25 cm C18 PicoFrit column (New Objective; Woburn, MA, USA) using a linear gradient of acetonitrile (3–36%) in 0.1% formic acid. The elution duration was 110 min at a flow rate of 0.3 μl/min. Eluted peptides from the PicoFrit column were ionized and sprayed into the mass spectrometer, using a Nanospray Flex Ion Source ES071 (Thermo) under the following settings: spray voltage, 1.6 kV and capillary temperature, 250 °C. The Q Exactive instrument was operated in the data dependent mode to automatically switch between full scan MS and MS/MS acquisition. Survey full scan MS spectra (m/z 300–2000) were acquired in the Orbitrap with 70,000 resolution (m/z 200) after accumulation of ions to a 3 × 106 target value based on predictive AGC from the previous full scan. Dynamic exclusion was set to 20 sec. The 12 most intense multiply-charged ions (z ≥ 2) were sequentially isolated and fragmented in the Axial Higher energy Collision-induced Dissociation (HCD) cell using normalized HCD collision energy at 25% with an AGC target 1e5 and a maxima injection time of 100 ms at 17,500 resolution.
HPLC-MS/MS data analysis
The raw MS files were analyzed using the Thermo Proteome Discoverer 1.4.1 platform (Thermo Scientific; Bremen, Germany) for peptide identification and protein assembly. For each cell sample, 16 raw MS files obtained from 16 sequential LC-MS analyses were grouped for a single database search against the Human UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot human protein sequence databases (20597 entries, 12/20/2013) based on the SEQUEST and percolator algorithms through the Proteome Discoverer 1.4.1 platform. Carbamidomethylation of cysteines was set as a fixed modification. The minimum peptide length was specified to be five amino acids. The precursor mass tolerance was set to 15 ppm, whereas fragment mass tolerance was set to 0.05 kDa. The maximum false peptide discovery rate was specified as 0.01. The resulting Proteome Discoverer Report contains all assembled proteins (a proteome profile) with peptides sequences and matched spectrum counts. Three proteome profiles were generated for the untreated control cells and two HSP90 inhibitor-treated cell samples.
Protein quantification
Protein quantification used the normalized spectral abundance factors (NSAFs) method to calculate the protein relative abundance55, 56. To describe quantitatively the relative abundance, the ppm (part per million) was chosen as the unit and the 1,000,000 ppm value was assigned to each proteome profile. A ppm value at the range of 0 to 1,000,000 ppm for each identified protein in each proteome profile was calculated based on its normalized NSAF.
The ppm was calculated as follows:
where RCN is the relative concentration of protein N in the proteome of test sample; NSAFN is the protein’s normalized spectral abundance factor; and N is the protein index.
NSAFs were calculated as follows:
where N is the protein index; SN is the number of peptide spectra matched to the protein; LN is the length of protein N (number of amino acid residues); and n is the total number of proteins in the input database (proteome profile for one cell sample). The ratio of HSP90 inhibitor treated versus untreated control was defined as 1000 if the protein was not identified in untreated control, or as 0.001 if the protein was not identified in HSP90 inhibitor-treated sample.
Signaling pathway analysis
Cell functions are executed and regulated by the proteome. The regulation of different cellular functions has been categorized into a number of pathways, such as cell cycle and apoptosis signaling pathways. To facilitate the proteomic analysis of the activation strength of a pathway, the pathway protein components, according to their functions, were designated as ligands, receptors, activating regulators, inhibitory regulators, or effectors, and their relative abundances (ppm) were summed. The protein list for all analyzed pathways and processes was obtained from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway database (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/pathway.html), and their functional annotations were manually confirmed using the UniProtKB protein database and the NCBI protein database or available publications. The Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) program (http://www.ingenuity.com) was used to extract interactive networks among the proteins. A network with a score >2 was considered valid.
Western blot analysis
The 5637 cells were exposed to AUY922 (100–250 nM), ganetespib (0.5–1 μM), or SNX2112 (0.5–1 μM) for 12–24 h. Then the cells were harvested and lysed with 200 μl of RIPA lysis buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 1.0% NP-40, 0.25% Na-deoxycholate, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM aprotinin, 1 μg/ml PMSF, leupeptin, and pepstatin. The protein concentration was quantified by BCA assay, and equal amounts of protein (30 μg) from the untreated control and treated cells were boiled for 5 min in Laemmli buffer, separated by 4–12% SDS-PAGE, and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Life Technologies). The blots were probed with primary antibodies against acetyl-histone H3, H3K4me1, H3K4me2, H3K4me3, H3K18ac, H3K23ac, H3K27ac, H3K79me1, H3K79me2, acetyl-histone H4, H4K8ac, H4K12ac, and H4K20me3, followed by secondary AP-conjugated antibodies. The blots were stripped with Restore Western Blot Stripping Buffer, and reprobed with an anti-histone H3 or anti-histone H4 antibody as a loading control. The immunoreactivity was visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (Life Technologies).
Statistical and bioinformatic analysis
All quantitative values are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD) and compared among groups using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). All analyses were performed on SPSS 18.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) for Windows. Student’s t-test was used to analyze the statistical significance of differences between untreated controls and HSP90 inhibitor-treated groups, or between HSP90 inhibitor-treated 5637 cells and HSP90 inhibitor-treated SV-HUC cells. All P values were determined using a two-sided test, and P < 0.05 was considered to indicate significance. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis were performed using DAVID bioinformatics resources tool (DAVID v6.7, the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery) with the total Homo sapiens genome information as the background. GO molecular function and biological process categories were analyzed separately. The adjusted P-value (Benjamini-Hochberg correction) cutoff is <0.05.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the U.S. National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research.
Author Contributions
Q.Q.L. conceived of the project, conducted the studies, performed cell apoptosis/proliferation assays, immunoblotting, and other experiments, carried out the analysis and interpretation of data, wrote the manuscript, and is the primary author of this paper. J.J.H. and Z.Z. performed nanospray LC-MS/MS experiment and LC-MS/MS data analysis. L.S.K., K.H., and T.S. edited the manuscript. J.B.T. and L.N. interpreted data and critically reviewed the manuscript. P.K.A. participated in the design and coordination of the study and edited the final version of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final paper.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41598-017-00143-6
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Qingdi Quentin Li, Email: liquenti@mail.nih.gov.
Jane B. Trepel, Email: trepelj@mail.nih.gov
Piyush K. Agarwal, Email: agarwalpk2@mail.nih.gov
References
- 1.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bellmunt J, Petrylak DP. New therapeutic challenges in advanced bladder cancer. Semi Oncol. 2012;39:598–607. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2012.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Weintraub MD, Li QQ, Agarwal PK. Advances in intravesical therapy for the treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (Review) Mol Clin Oncol. 2014;2:656–660. doi: 10.3892/mco.2014.314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sternberg CN, et al. International Consultation on Urologic Disease-European Association of Urology Consultation on Bladder, C. ICUD-EAU International Consultation on Bladder Cancer 2012: Chemotherapy for urothelial carcinoma-neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. Eur Urol. 2013;63:58–66. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Trepel J, Mollapour M, Giaccone G, Neckers L. Targeting the dynamic HSP90 complex in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10:537–549. doi: 10.1038/nrc2887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jhaveri K, Modi S. Ganetespib: research and clinical development. OncoTargets Ther. 2015;8:1849–1858. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S65804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jhaveri K, et al. Heat shock protein 90 inhibitors in the treatment of cancer: current status and future directions. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2014;23:611–628. doi: 10.1517/13543784.2014.902442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Richardson PG, et al. Inhibition of heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) as a therapeutic strategy for the treatment of myeloma and other cancers. Br J Haematol. 2011;152:367–379. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08360.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pick E, et al. High HSP90 expression is associated with decreased survival in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2007;67:2932–2937. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gallegos Ruiz MI, et al. Integration of gene dosage and gene expression in non-small cell lung cancer, identification of HSP90 as potential target. PLoS One. 2008;3:e0001722. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Calderwood SK, Gong J. Heat shock proteins promote cancer: it’s a protection racket. Trends Biochem Sci. 2016;41:311–323. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2016.01.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Garg G, Khandelwal A, Blagg BS. Anticancer inhibitors of Hsp90 function: beyond the usual suspects. Adv Cancer Res. 2016;129:51–88. doi: 10.1016/bs.acr.2015.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Workman P, Burrows F, Neckers L, Rosen N. Drugging the cancer chaperone HSP90: combinatorial therapeutic exploitation of oncogene addiction and tumor stress. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1113:202–216. doi: 10.1196/annals.1391.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lebret T, et al. HSP90 expression: a new predictive factor for BCG response in stage Ta-T1 grade 3 bladder tumours. Eur Urol. 2007;51:161–166. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Whitesell L, Lindquist SL. HSP90 and the chaperoning of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5:761–772. doi: 10.1038/nrc1716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kim YS, et al. Update on Hsp90 inhibitors in clinical trial. Curr Topics Med Chem. 2009;9:1479–1492. doi: 10.2174/156802609789895728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Miyata Y, Nakamoto H, Neckers L. The therapeutic target Hsp90 and cancer hallmarks. Curr Pharm Des. 2013;19:347–365. doi: 10.2174/138161213804143725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Woodford MR, et al. Impact of posttranslational modifications on the anticancer activity of Hsp90 inhibitors. Adv Cancer Res. 2016;129:31–50. doi: 10.1016/bs.acr.2015.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Neckers L, Trepel JB. Stressing the development of small molecules targeting HSP90. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:275–277. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lee KH, et al. Antitumor activity of NVP-AUY922, a novel heat shock protein 90 inhibitor, in human gastric cancer cells is mediated through proteasomal degradation of client proteins. Cancer Sci. 2011;102:1388–1395. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.01944.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Okui T, et al. Antitumor effect of novel HSP90 inhibitor NVP-AUY922 against oral squamous cell carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 2011;31:1197–1204. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wang Y, Trepel JB, Neckers LM, Giaccone G. STA-9090, a small-molecule Hsp90 inhibitor for the potential treatment of cancer. Curr Opin Investig Drugs. 2010;11:1466–1476. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Shimamura T, et al. Ganetespib (STA-9090), a nongeldanamycin HSP90 inhibitor, has potent antitumor activity in in vitro and in vivo models of non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:4973–4985. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chandarlapaty S, et al. SNX2112, a synthetic heat shock protein 90 inhibitor, has potent antitumor activity against HER kinase-dependent cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:240–248. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Okawa Y, et al. SNX-2112, a selective Hsp90 inhibitor, potently inhibits tumor cell growth, angiogenesis, and osteoclastogenesis in multiple myeloma and other hematologic tumors by abrogating signaling via Akt and ERK. Blood. 2009;113:846–855. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-04-151928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Graham B, et al. The heat shock protein 90 inhibitor, AT13387, displays a long duration of action in vitro and in vivo in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Sci. 2012;103:522–527. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.02191.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bao R, et al. CUDC-305, a novel synthetic HSP90 inhibitor with unique pharmacologic properties for cancer therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:4046–4057. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bao R, et al. Targeting heat shock protein 90 with CUDC-305 overcomes erlotinib resistance in non-small cell lung cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2009;8:3296–3306. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-0538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Solit DB, et al. Phase II trial of 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin in patients with metastatic melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:8302–8307. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Goldman JW, et al. A first in human, safety, pharmacokinetics, and clinical activity phase I study of once weekly administration of the Hsp90 inhibitor ganetespib (STA-9090) in patients with solid malignancies. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:152. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhao Y, Garcia BA. Comprehensive catalog of currently documented histone modifications. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015;7:a025064. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a025064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Huang H, Lin S, Garcia BA, Zhao Y. Quantitative proteomic analysis of histone modifications. Chem Rev. 2015;115:2376–2418. doi: 10.1021/cr500491u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Guedes S, Vitorino R, Domingues MR, Amado F, Domingues P. Glycation and oxidation of histones H2B and H1: in vitro study and characterization by mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2011;399:3529–3539. doi: 10.1007/s00216-011-4679-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hassler MR, Egger G. Epigenomics of cancer - emerging new concepts. Biochimie. 2012;94:2219–2230. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2012.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Jeronimo C, Henrique R. Epigenetic biomarkers in urological tumors: a systematic review. Cancer Lett. 2014;342:264–274. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2011.12.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bannister AJ, Kouzarides T. Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Res. 2011;21:381–395. doi: 10.1038/cr.2011.22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Strahl BD, Allis CD. The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature. 2000;403:41–45. doi: 10.1038/47412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Olsen CA. Expansion of the lysine acylation landscape. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2012;51:3755–3756. doi: 10.1002/anie.201200316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Morris SA, et al. Overlapping chromatin-remodeling systems collaborate genome wide at dynamic chromatin transitions. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2014;21:73–81. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Voss TC, Hager GL. Dynamic regulation of transcriptional states by chromatin and transcription factors. Nat Rev Genet. 2014;15:69–81. doi: 10.1038/nrg3623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Voss TC, et al. Dynamic exchange at regulatory elements during chromatin remodeling underlies assisted loading mechanism. Cell. 2011;146:544–554. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Stavreva DA, Hager GL. Chromatin structure and gene regulation: a dynamic view of enhancer function. Nucleus. 2015;6:442–448. doi: 10.1080/19491034.2015.1107689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Stavreva DA, et al. Dynamics of chromatin accessibility and long-range interactions in response to glucocorticoid pulsing. Genome Res. 2015;25:845–857. doi: 10.1101/gr.184168.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ipenberg I, Guttmann-Raviv N, Khoury HP, Kupershmit I, Ayoub N. Heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) selectively regulates the stability of KDM4B/JMJD2B histone demethylase. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:14681–14687. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C113.462770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Isaacs JS. Hsp90 as a “chaperone” of the epigenome: insights and opportunities for cancer therapy. Adv Cancer Res. 2016;129:107–140. doi: 10.1016/bs.acr.2015.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ruden DM, Lu X. Hsp90 affecting chromatin remodeling might explain transgenerational epigenetic inheritance in Drosophila. Curr Genomics. 2008;9:500–508. doi: 10.2174/138920208786241207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Maloney A, et al. Gene and protein expression profiling of human ovarian cancer cells treated with the heat shock protein 90 inhibitor 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin. Cancer Res. 2007;67:3239–3253. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zismanov V, Drucker L, Gottfried M. ER homeostasis and motility of NSCLC cell lines can be therapeutically targeted with combined Hsp90 and HDAC inhibitors. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2013;26:388–394. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2013.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Xu W, Neckers L. Gr(i)p the ER to Stress Out Melanoma. Cancer Cell. 2016;29:769–771. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2016.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Abbosh PH, McConkey DJ, Plimack ER. Targeting signaling transduction pathways in bladder cancer. Curr Oncol Rep. 2015;17:58. doi: 10.1007/s11912-015-0477-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.van Kessel KE, Zuiverloon TC, Alberts AR, Boormans JL, Zwarthoff EC. Targeted therapies in bladder cancer: an overview of in vivo research. Nat Rev Urol. 2015;12:681–694. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2015.231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.O’Rourke CJ, et al. Manipulating the epigenome for the treatment of urological malignancies. Pharmacol Ther. 2013;138:185–196. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Cancer Genome Atlas Research. Comprehensive molecular characterization of urothelial bladder carcinoma. Nature507, 315–322 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 54.Li QQ, et al. β-Elemene promotes cisplatin-induced cell death in human bladder cancer and other carcinomas. Anticancer Res. 2013;33:1421–1428. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Florens L, et al. Analyzing chromatin remodeling complexes using shotgun proteomics and normalized spectral abundance factors. Methods. 2006;40:303–311. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2006.07.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Paoletti AC, et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis of distinct mammalian Mediator complexes using normalized spectral abundance factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:18928–18933. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0606379103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.