Abstract
Canine distemper virus (CDV) exhibits lymphotropic, epitheliotropic, and neurotropic nature, and causes a severe systemic infection in susceptible animals. Initially, signaling lymphocyte activation molecule (SLAM) expressed on immune cells has been identified as a crucial cellular receptor for CDV. Currently, nectin-4 expressed in epithelia has been shown to be another receptor for CDV. Our previous study demonstrated that neurons express nectin-4 and are infected with CDV. In this study, we investigated the distribution pattern of nectin-4 in various cell types in the canine central nervous system and showed its relation to CDV infection to further clarify the pathology of disease. Histopathological, immunohistochemical and immunofluorescent analyses were done using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues of CDV-infected dogs. Dual staining of nectin-4 and CDV antigen or nectin-4 and brain cell markers was performed. Nectin-4 was detected in ependymal cells, epithelia of choroid plexus, meningeal cells, neurons, granular cells, and Purkinje’s cells. CDV antigens were detected in these nectin-4-positive cells, further suggesting contribution of nectin-4 for the CDV neurovirulence. On the other hand, astrocytes did not express nectin-4, although they were frequently infected with CDV. Since astrocytes are negative for SLAM expression, they must express an unidentified CDV receptor, which also contributes to CDV neurovirulence.
Introduction
Canine distemper virus (CDV) is a highly virulent pathogen, which threatens various animals mainly in the order Carnivora. CDV belongs to the genus Morbillivirus of the family Paramyxoviridae. The virus particles possess two types of glycoprotein spikes, haemagglutinin (H) and fusion (F) proteins, on the virus envelope. The H protein binds to a cellular receptor and the F protein mediates membrane fusion. The H and F proteins play essential roles for virus entry. They are also critical for virus spread via cell-to-cell fusion. CDV transmits by inhalation of aerosol droplets or contact with respiratory tract secretions. CDV primarily replicates in immune cells, which express a specific cellular receptor, signaling lymphocyte activation molecule (SLAM, CD150)1. By using SLAM, CDV disseminates to lymphoid organs or tissues throughout the body, inducing lymphopenia and immunosuppression2–7. Recent studies demonstrated that CDV also propagates in epithelia of respiratory, urinary and gastrointestinal tracts by using nectin-4 (also known as poliovirus receptor-like protein-4 (PVRL4)) as a receptor8. Furthermore, CDV spreads in the central nervous system (CNS), showing neurovirulence. Our previous study demonstrated that a subset of neurons is infected with CDV and that they express nectin-4, suggesting the possible role of nectin-4 for the neurovirulence of CDV8. However, contribution of nectin-4 for CDV spread in the CNS still remained to be studied, because, in addition to neurons, many types of neuronal and glial cells are infected with CDV in vivo 7, 9, 10. This study aimed to reveal the distribution pattern of nectin-4 in canine tissues, especially in the CNS and to show correlation of CDV infection with the nectin-4 expression pattern of cells.
Results
Pathologic findings
Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues of 13 CDV-infected dogs (Nos 1–13) were used. In a previous study we have isolated Asia-1 lineage CDV strains from 6 dogs (Nos 5, 6, 9–11, 13) and Asia-4 lineage CDV strains from 3 dogs (Nos 6, 8, 12) among the 13 CDV-infected dogs (Table 1)11. Histological analysis by HE staining revealed CDV-associated pathological changes in various tissues, including eosinophillic intracytoplasmic or intranuclear inclusion bodies (ICIB or INIB), lymphoid depletion, and syncytial formation. Suppurative and necrotizing inflammation was observed in tissues of several dogs, suggesting secondary bacterial infections in the animals.
Table 1.
Case | Breeda | Age | Sexb | Clinical signsc | RT-PCRd | CDV strainsf | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(months) | RS | NS | GIS | SL | |||||
No. 1 | Pug | MD | M | + | N/A | N/A | |||
No. 2 | MD | 3 | F | + | + | N/A | N/A | ||
No. 3 | CHH | MD | M | + | + | N/A | N/A | ||
No. 4 | YT | MD | F | MD | N/A | N/A | |||
No. 5 | RT | 3 | M | + | F, P, H | Asia1 | |||
No. 6 | MG | MD | F | MD | F, P | Asia4 | |||
No. 7 | POM | 2 | F | + | + | F, P, H | Asia1 | ||
No. 8 | MP | 5 years | F | + | + | F, P | Asia4 | ||
No. 9 | CHH | MD | M | MD | F, P, H | Asia1 | |||
No. 10 | GR | 2 | F | + | + | F | Asia1 | ||
No. 11 | GR | 2 | M | MD | F, P | Asia1 | |||
No. 12 | SB | 12 | M | + | + | + | + | F, P, H | Asia4 |
No. 13 | DA | 17 | F | + | + | H | Asia1 |
MD: missing data, N/A: not analyzed. aBreed: CHH: Chi huahua, YT: Yorkshire terrier, RT: Rottweiler, MG: Mongrel, POM: Pomeranian, MP: Miniature pincher, GR: Golden retriever, SB: Saint Bernard, DA: Dachshund. bSex: M: male, F: female. cClinical signs: RS: respiratory disorder, NS: neurological disorder, GIS: gastrointestinal disorder, SL: skin lesion. Data for nine dogs (Nos 5–13) were reported previously (Radtanakatikanon et al.)11. dReverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) showed specific bands targeting fusion (F), phosphoprotein (P) and hemagglutinin (H) genes (Radtanakatikanon et al.)11. fThe classified linage of nucleotide sequences of F, H, P genes were aligned with other available CDV strains in Genbank (Radtanakatikanon et al.)11.
Clinical data showed that the majority of dogs developed respiratory symptoms. Histopathological analyses revealed bronchointerstitial (Nos 2, 5–8, 11–13) and interstitial pneumonia (Nos 1, 9) with or without fibrinosuppurative inflammation. Syncytial formation was observed in bronchiolar epithelium, and both ICIB and INIB were notably seen in bronchial and bronchiolar epithelial cells. Proliferation of pulmonary alveolar macrophages was detected, and ICIB and INIB were also detected in these cells. Three out of 13 dogs (Nos 7, 12, 13) apparently developed clinical signs for gastrointestinal tract disorders (Table 1). On the other hand, the intestines in the most cases showed catarrhal enteritis and necrotic villi with infiltrative mononuclear inflammatory cells (Nos 1–2, 4–6, 8, 9, 11). ICIB was often detected in enterocytes and the lamina propria. In addition, INIB was detected in gastric glandular epithelial cells in a dog (No. 6). Lymphoid tissues or organs including spleen, lymph node, tonsil and Payer’s patch showed mild to marked lymphoid cell depletion, and INIB was detected in all lymphoid tissue samples. The urogenital lesion showed ICIB in transitional cells and epithelial cells of the renal pelvis (Nos 4, 6–8, 11). Five out of 13 dogs (Nos 2, 3, 5, 10, 12) developed clinical signs for neurological disorders (Table 1). Overtgliosis, demyelination with the presence of gitter cells, and non-suppurative polioencephalitis with mononuclear perivascular cuffing were observed in these dogs. ICIB was detected in neurons, and glia and ependymal cells.
CDV antigens were detected by IHC assay. CDV antigens were abundantly detected in various organs of all dogs (Table 2). Although analysis by HE staining showed little, if any, histopathological changes in some dogs, strong immunoreactions against CDV antigens were detected even in these dogs (Table 2). CDV positive cells were observed in both white and grey matters of each part of the brain (Table 3). CDV antigens were detected in variety of cell types in the CNS, including neurons, Purkinje’s cells, granular cells, astrocytes, ependymal cells, epithelial cells of choroid plexus, and meningeal cells (Table 3).
Table 2.
Case | Lymphoid organsa | Respiratoryb | Stomach | Intestinec | Kidneyd | UB | Otherse | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LN | SP | TS | BE | PAM | ||||||
No. 1 | NS | ++ | NS | + | ++ | NS | + | +/RP | NS | |
No. 2 | NS | ++ | NS | + | ++ | +++ | +++ | +/RP | ++ | +/KC |
No. 3 | NS | ++ | NS | + | ++ | NS | NS | ++/RP | NS | |
No. 4 | ++ | ++ | NS | ++ | ++ | NS | +++/PP | +/RP | NS | |
No. 5 | +++ | ++ | ++ | + | ++ | NS | ++ | ++/RP | ++ | |
No. 6 | ++ | +++ | ++ | +++ | ++ | +++ | +++ | ++/RP | NS | +/KC |
No. 7 | ++ | ++ | NS | ++ | + | NS | +/RP | + | ||
No. 8 | NS | +++ | NS | + | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++/RP | ++ | +/KC |
No. 9 | ++ | + | NS | +++ | ++ | − | ++ | +/RP | + | |
No. 10 | NS | |||||||||
No. 11 | NS | +++ | +++ | + | ++ | ++ | ++ | +/RP | ++ | |
No. 12 | ++ | +++ | NS | + | + | NS | NS | +/RP | NS | ++/SK |
No. 13 | NS | + | NS | + | ++ | NS | +/KC |
Immunoreactivity grading: +++ marked positive, ++ moderate positive, + slight positive, −negative. NS: no sample available. aLymphoid organs: LN: Lymph node, SP: Spleen, TS: Tonsil. bRespiratory: BE: Bronchial epithelium, PAM: Pulmonary alveolar macrophage. cIntestine: PP: Payer’s patch. dKidney: RP: Renal pelvis epithelium. eOthers: KC: Kupffer cells, SK: Skin epithelium.
Table 3.
Case | Cerebrum | Cerebellum | Mid brain | Spinal cord | Meningeal cells | Ependymal cells | Choroid plexus cells | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nu | As | Nu | As | Nu | As | Nu | As | ||||
No. 1 | − | + | − | +++ | − | + | NS | − | − | − | |
No. 2 | + | ++ | + | ++ | − | + | NS | − | − | − | |
No. 3 | − | ++ | − | +++ | − | ++ | NS | − | − | + | |
No. 4 | + | +++ | − | ++ | + | ++ | NS | − | + | − | |
No. 5 | − | + | − | + | + | + | + | + | − | ++ | − |
No. 6 | − | ++ | − | +++ | − | +++ | − | ++ | +++ | ++ | ++ |
No. 7 | + | ++ | − | − | − | + | − | − | − | + | − |
No. 8 | + | +++ | + | +++ | + | ++ | − | ++ | − | + | − |
No. 9 | − | + | − | − | − | − | − | + | − | − | − |
No. 10 | +++ | +++ | Gr | ++ | − | ++ | − | ++ | − | − | − |
No. 11 | − | + | − | − | − | + | − | + | − | ++ | |
No. 12 | − | ++ | − | + | + | − | − | − | − | − | |
No. 13 | +++ | ++ | Pu | ++ | ++ | ++ | NS | − | ++ | − |
Immunoreactivity grading: +++ marked positive, ++ moderate positive, + slight positive, − negative. NS: no sample available. aCentral nervous system: Nu: Neuron, As: Astrocyte, Gr: Granular cells, Pu: Purkinje’s cells.
Nectin-4 expression in canine tissues
Single staining by IHC revealed that gastric and intestinal glandular epithelial cells were strongly positive for nectin-4 (Fig. 1A,B). The epithelial cells of bronchi and bronchiole in the lung, and renal tubular and pelvis epithelial cells showed a moderate staining pattern for nectin-4 (Fig. 1C,D). Neurons at the corticomedullary junction of cerebrum were moderately or weakly positive for nectin-4 (Fig. 1E). Purkinje’s cells in cerebellum were also weakly positive for nectin-4 (Fig. 1F). Nectin-4 was undetectable in lymph nodes and spleen. In any nectin-4 positive cases, nectin-4 was distributed in the cytoplasm as well as the cell surface, but not in the nucleus (Fig. 1A–F).
Dual staining by IHC and IFA were performed to clarify which specific cell types in the CNS express nectin-4. In neurons NeuN was often detected together with nectin-4 (Fig. 2A–D). The nectin-4 positive rate of neurons was 58.7%. The granular layer of cerebellum was also positive for NeuN, but hardly labeled with nectin-4. Interestingly, Purkinje’s cells did not express NeuN, while they were weakly positive for nectin-4 (Fig. 2M–P). In the white matter of all sections, both NeuN and nectin-4 were only scantly visualized. Co-expression of NeuN and nectin-4 was also observed in large neurons of the mid brain and the spinal cord. By contrast, neither GFAP nor Iba-1 was co-expressed together with nectin-4 in any cell types in the CNS (Fig. 2E–H and I–L). Astrocytes were stained with GFAP but not with nectin-4 (Fig. 2E–H). The lack of nectin-4 expression in astrocytes was consistent with the previous findings by Alves et al. 12 using a primary dog brain cell culture (DBCC; mainly composed of astrocytes) and dog’s brain sections, respectively12. Microglias were stained with Iba-1 but not with nectin-4 (Fig. 2I–L). Ependymal cells and epithelial cells of the choroid plexus were negative for both neuronal (NeuN) and glial (GFAP and Iba-1) cell markers, while they expressed nectin-4 (Fig. 3S and W). These data clearly demonstrated that expression of nectin-4 is specific to neurons, Purkinje’s cells, ependymal cells, and epithelial cells of the choroid plexus and that astrocytes and microglias do not express nectin-4.
Detection of CDV antigens in nectin-4 positive cells
Dual staining by IHC and IFA were performed to show correlation between nectin-4 expression and CDV infection. Nectin-4 was ubiquitously expressed in glandular epithelial cells of stomach and intestine, and CDV antigens were strongly positive in these cells (Fig. 3A–D). Also epithelial cells of the renal tubule and renal pelvis and transitional epithelial cells of urinary bladder ubiquitously expressed nectin-4, and CDV antigens were detected in these cells (Fig. 3E–H). These patterns were similar to those observed in the respiratory organs, particularly in bronchial and bronchiolar epithelia, although the nectin-4 signal intensity in the urinary and gastrointestinal tracts was greater than that in the respiratory tract. Interestingly, one sample of the tonsillar epithelial cells obtained from case No. 11 and keratinocytes of epidermis obtained from case No. 12 demonstrated co-labeling with both nectin-4 and CDV antigens (Table 2). In the CNS, dual staining pattern of both nectin-4 and CDV antigens was often seen in neurons (Fig. 3I–L). CDV-infected Purkinje’s cells (Fig. 3M–P), ependymal cells (Fig. 3Q–T), and choroid plexus cells (Fig. 3U–X) were also shown to express nectin-4. Exceptionally, astrocytes were negative for nectin-4 expression (Fig. 2G), as Alves et al. 12 demonstrated previously12, although they were infected with CDV (Table 3).
Discussion
Although many aspects in the CDV pathogenicity have been obtained, molecular mechanisms of CDV spread in the CNS still remains unclear. SLAM is a principle receptor for CDV infection, and functions as a common receptor for morbilliviruses. Based on data of human and mouse tissues, the molecule is mainly expressed on dendritic cells, macrophages, immature thymocytes, and activated lymphocytes13–16. Interestingly, SLAM expression is up-regulated in many organs in CDV-infected dogs17, 18. Even in the epithelia of lung, stomach, intestine, and urinary tract, SLAM-positive cells are detected17, but they are likely tissue resident immune cells or infiltrated inflammatory cells. The brain is basically negative for SLAM expression, and only individual cells within blood vessel walls rarely show positive staining for SLAM17, 19. Despite the lack of SLAM expression, varieties of cell types, including neurons, Purkinje’s cells, granular cells, astrocytes, ependymal cells, epithelial cells of choroid plexus, and meningeal cells, are infected with CDV20–28. Therefore, SLAM unlikely plays a main role for the CDV spread in the CNS.
The present study confirmed our previous observations8 that nectin-4 is massively expressed in bronchial, bronchiolar, gastric and intestinal glandular epithelial cells, transitional epithelial cells, renal pelvis epithelia, epithelium of tonsil, and keratinocytes of epidermis. The expression pattern in epithelial tissues of dogs was similar to that in humans12, 29. However, our data suggested that expression pattern of nectin-4 in the CNS is greatly differ between dogs and humans. Many cell types in the CNS of dogs (neurons, granular cells, Purkinje’s cells, ependymal cells, epithelia of choroid plexus, and meningeal cells) express nectin-4, while the molecule is difficult to be detected in the human brain samples29, 30. In the previous study, we have detected nectin-4 in the dog brain and suggested that infection of neurons via nectin-4 contributes to neuropathogenicity of CDV8. The nucleotide and predicted amino acid sequences of the dog nectin-4, which has been obtained from the cerebral cortex, have been previously deposited in GenBank with the accession number AB7554298. Although a subset of neurons is infected with CDV, it would be evident that infection of other cell types in the CNS also contributes to the neurovirulence. Astrocytes are apparently a major target by CDV, although they do not express nectin-412, 19. Demyelination, a typical pathological change due to CDV infection of the brain, coincides with CDV infection of astrocytes, while CDV antigens are poorly detected in oligodendrocytes23–25, 27, 31. Previous studies21, 26 suggested that the amounts of CDV antigens and viral RNAs in the grey matter was greater than those in the white matter. On the other hand, it was also demonstrated that CDV infection of neurons in the grey matter is not as frequent and widespread as glial infection in the white matter20. In any case, it is clear that CDV infection of astrocytes via an unidentified receptor also contributes to the CDV neurovirulence. Although there were variations in the distribution pattern of CDV antigens among dogs in the present study, CDV antigens were detected in the CNS of all 13 dogs. However, neurological signs were detected only in five dogs. Since many dogs have died due to secondary bacterial infections in the respiratory tract, some dogs may have died prior to neurological sign development.
Neuronal pathway of CDV infection can be explained by two mechanisms. Firstly, CDV may enter the CNS through the choroid plexus or cerebral blood vessel by using infected mononuclear immune cells. Secondly, CDV may attack via the anterograde pathway utilizing olfactory bulb as a primarily viral target organ32. Vandevelde et al. 20 suggested that CDV enters the CNS along the central spinal fluid (CSF) pathway, because CDV antigens are often detected in the subependymal white matter, along with the ependymal cell infection. We have also observed that ependymal cells near the choroid plexus were more frequently infected with CDV than those in other regions, suggesting that CDV spread via CSF. Nectin-4 can greatly contribute to the CDV invasion into the CNS, since meningeal cells, ependymal cells, and epithelia of choroid plexus express nectin-4. However, in this study, the expression of nectin-4 in cerebral endothelial cells was not up-regulated after CDV infection which was inconsistent with the previous study in measles virus (MV) infection33. Abdullah et al. 33 observed that nectin-4 was up-regulated in MV-infected human cerebral endothelial cells in vitro. It is suggested that MV infection of brain endothelial cells allows efficient virus production and likely allows virus invasion into the brain parenchyma in immunocompromised hosts.
Our data in the present study advanced our understanding of CDV neurovirulence. However, it is still unclear how CDV infects astrocytes. Alves et al. 12 also demonstrated that CDV infects astrocytes via SLAM and nectin-4-independent pathway. They performed the immunohistological staining and showed that nectin-4 could not be detected in the white matter of cerebellar tissues12, which is consistent with our findings. Besides SLAM and nectin-4, several molecules have been shown to support CDV infection. Fujita et al. 34 showed that CDV binds to a heparin sulfate molecule, and the molecule contributes to the CDV infection. CD9, a tetraspan transmembrane protein, is involved in the process of CDV induced cell-to-cell fusion, but not in virus entry35. Other studies also suggested that chicken embryo fibroblasts and Vero cells express unidentified CDV receptors36, 37. For MV, which is closely related to CDV, neurokinin-1 is shown to act as a receptor for trans-synaptic spread between neurons38. Identification of a CDV receptor on astrocytes is a key to further strengthen our understanding of CDV neuropathology.
In conclusion, our data in the present study further suggested that nectin-4 contributes to the CDV spread in the CNS of dogs and possibly entry into the brain via CSF. In addition, our data demonstrated that another unidentified molecule on astrocytes also plays a crucial role for the CDV neurovirulence.
Methods
Retrieved canine tissues
Various formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues (brain, lung, stomach, intestine, kidney, urinary bladder, skin, lymph node) from thirteen CDV-infected dogs (Nos 1–13) were collected during submission to routine necropsy. Other two non-CDV infected dogs (Nos 14–15) were used to study the distribution of nectin-4 in a healthy condition. All dogs were retrospectively collected from Department of Veterinary Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand during 2007–2011. The 4-μm thick sections were cut and stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin (HE). The histopathological features were determined by light microscopy. The clinical symptoms of these dogs were summarized in Table 1. All experimental protocols were approved by the Chulalongkorn University Animal Care and Use Committee (No. 11310088). All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.
Single staining by immunohistochemistry (IHC)
To reveal the extent of CDV infection, the FFPE sections from infected dogs were immunohistochemically processed as described previously39. Primary antibodies used were summarized in Supplementary Table S1. Briefly, the sections were subjected to the heat-induced antigen retrieval using autoclave in citrate buffer pH 6. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked by hydrogen peroxide (3% in methanol). Following incubation with monoclonal mouse anti-CDV antibodies (against H and F proteins; MonotopeTM, Portland, ME), the EnVision polymer (Dako, Denmark) was applied. The chromogen immunoreactivity was visualized by 3′3-diaminobenzidine (DAB; Sigma, USA) in horseradish peroxidase (HRP) system and counterstained with Meyer’s hematoxylin.
To reveal the nectin-4 positive cell types in healthy dogs, non-CDV infected FFPE canine tissues were pre-treated and visualized as mentioned above. The primary and secondary antibodies were affinity-purified polyclonal goat antibody raised against the human nectin-4 (10 μg/ml dilution, R&D system, USA) and an immune-peroxidase polymer-conjugated anti-goat antibody (Histofine® simple stain MAX–PO (G); Nichirei, Japan), respectively.
Double staining by IHC
To elucidate the co-expression of CDV and nectin-4 in CDV-infected tissues, FFPE sections were pre-treated and incubated with the anti-CDV primary antibody as described in single staining by IHC. Subsequently, an immuno-alkaline-phosphatase polymer-conjugated anti-mouse antibody (Histofine® simple stain AP (MULTI); Nichirei, Japan) was utilized as a secondary antibody. Before visualization, sections were immersed in Tris Buffered Saline (TBS) and colorized by Fast red II in naphthol phostphate (Nichirei, Japan) using an alkaline phosphatase system. For nectin-4 staining, the same procedures as described in single staining by IHC were carried out.
To identify CDV infection of specific cell types in the CNS, samples from cerebrum, cerebellum, mid brain and spinal cord were pre-treated and incubated with a primary (rabbit polyclonal) antibody for one of the brain cell markers (NeuN, GFAP, and Iba-1) in appropriate dilutions (Supplementary Table S1). The universal immuno-alkaline-phosphatase polymer-conjugated anti-rabbit antibody (Histofine® simple stain AP(MULTI); Nichirei, Japan) and Fast red II in alkaline phosphatase system were subsequently applied. For CDV antigens staining, the procedures described in single staining by IHC were carried out.
Double staining of nectin-4 and a specific brain cell marker (NeuN, GFAP, or Iba-1) was done. The immunostaining procedures for nectin-4 and brain cell markers were described above.
Double staining by immunofluorescence assay (IFA)
Dual staining by IFA was further performed to reveal expression patterns of nectin-4 and CDV antigens in selected FFPE tissues (brain, lung, stomach, intestine, kidney, and urinary bladder). After antigen retrieval by heat induction, the endogenous peroxidase was blocked by blocking One reagent (NacalaiTesque, Japan). Sections were first incubated with a primary antibody against CDV antigens (Supplementary Table S1) and Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated donkey anti-mouse IgG (Invitrogen, USA) as a secondary antibody. Afterwards, nectin-4 was stained with an anti-nectin-4 antibody and Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated donkey anti-goat IgG (Invitrogen, USA). The nuclei were counterstained with 4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). The sections were covered with Vectersheild H-1500. The stained samples were observed by using the LSM 700 confocal laser scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss) and analyzed by using ZEN 2010 LSM software. The negative control was stained using healthy uninfected canine brain (Supplementary Figure S1).
To show which cell types in the CNS express nectin-4, selected CNS tissues were incubated with a primary antibody specific to one of the brain cell markers (NeuN, GFAP, or Iba-1) and Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG as a secondary antibody (Invitrogen, USA). Double staining was performed using an anti-nectin-4 antibody and Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated donkey anti-goat IgG as mentioned above.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
W. Pratakpiriya and this work were supported by grants from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, and the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, Japan. This study was partly funded by the Thailand Research Fund (TRG5780250) and Grant for Joint Funding of External Research Project, Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund and Veterinary Science Research Fund (RES_57_397_31_037), Chulalongkorn University.
Author Contributions
M.T. and R.Y. designed the study. W.P., A.P.P.T., A.R. and S.T. performed the experiments and analyses. W.P. and S.T. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. N.P. and N.T.L. provided substantial discussion. M.T. and R.Y. finalized the manuscript. All authors approved the manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41598-017-00375-6
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Somporn Techangamsuwan, Email: somporn62@hotmail.com.
Ryoji Yamaguchi, Email: a0d402u@cc.miyazaki-u.ac.jp.
References
- 1.Seki F, Ono N, Yamaguchi R, Yanagi Y. Efficient isolation of wild strains of canine distemper virus in Vero cells expressing canine SLAM (CD150) and their adaptability to Marmoset B95a cells. J Virol. 2003;77:9943–9950. doi: 10.1128/JVI.77.18.9943-9950.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kumagai K, Yamaguchi R, Uchida K, Tateyama S. Lymphoid apoptosis in acute canine distemper. J Vet Med Sci. 2004;66:175–181. doi: 10.1292/jvms.66.175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Scobesberger M, Summerfield A, Doherr MG, Zurbriggen A, Griot C. Canine distemper virus-induced depletion of uninfected lymphocytes is associated with apoptosis. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2005;104:33–44. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2004.09.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kajita M, et al. Canine distemper virus induces apoptosis through caspase-3 and -8 activation in vero cells. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. 2006;53:273–277. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0450.2006.00963.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Beineke A, Puff C, Seehusen F, Baumgärtner W. Pathogenesis and immunopathology of systemic and nervous canine distemper. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2009;127:1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2008.09.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tan B, et al. Pathogenesis and phylogenetic analyses of canine distemper virus strain ZJ7 isolate from domestic dogs in China. Virol J. 2011;8:520. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-8-520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lempp C, et al. Review: New aspects of the pathogenesis of canine distemper leukoencephalitis. Viruses. 2014;6:2571–2601. doi: 10.3390/v6072571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pratakpiriya W, et al. Nectin4 is an epithelial cell receptor for canine distemper virus and involved in neurovirulence. J Virol. 2012;86:10207–10210. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00824-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Appel MJ. Distemper pathogenesis in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1970;156:1681–1684. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.von Messling V, Milosevic D, Cattaneo R. Tropism illuminated: Lymphocyte-based pathways blazed by lethal morbillivirus through the host immune system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:14216–14221. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403597101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Radtanakatikanon A, et al. Genotypic lineages and restriction fragment length polymorphism of canine distemper virus isolation in Thailand. Vet Microbiol. 2013;166:76–83. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Alves L, et al. SLAM- and nectin-4-independent noncytolytic spread of canine distemper virus in astrocytes. J Virol. 2015;89:5724–5733. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00004-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Minagawa H, Tanaka K, Ono N, Tatsuo H, Yanagi Y. Induction of the measles virus receptor SLAM (CD150) on monocytes. J Gen Virol. 2001;82:2913–2917. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-82-12-2913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tatsuo H, Ono N, Yanagi Y. Morbilliviruses use signaling lymphocyte activation molecules (CD150) as cellular receptors. J Virol. 2001;75:5842–5850. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.13.5842-5850.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Seki F, Ono N, Yamaguchi R, Yanagi Y. Efficient isolation of wild strains of canine distemper virus in Vero cells expressing canine SLAM (CD150) and their adaptability to Marmoset B95a cells. J Virol. 2003;77:9943–9950. doi: 10.1128/JVI.77.18.9943-9950.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sidorenko SP, Clark EA. The dual-function CD150 receptor subfamily: the viral attraction. Nat Immunol. 2003;4:19–24. doi: 10.1038/ni0103-19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wenzlow N, Plattet P, Wittek R, Zurbriggen A, Grone A. Immunohistochemical demonstration of the putative canine distemper virus receptor CD150 in dogs with and without distemper. Vet Pathol. 2007;44:943–948. doi: 10.1354/vp.44-6-943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Techangamsuwan S, Puff C, Wewetzer K, Baumgärtner W. Differential expression of putative canine distemper virus receptors following in vitro infection of canine glia. J Thai Vet Med Assoc. 2009;39:432. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wyss-Fluehmann G, Zurbriggen A, Vandevelde M, Plattet P. Canine distemper virus persistence in demyelinating encephalitis by swift intracellular cell-to-cell spread in astrocytes is controlled by the viral attachment protein. Acta Neuropathol. 2010;119:617–630. doi: 10.1007/s00401-010-0644-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Vandevelde M, Zurbriggen A, Higgins RJ, Palmer D. Spread and distribution of viral antigen in nervous canine distemper. Acta Neuropathol. 1985;67:211–218. doi: 10.1007/BF00687803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kristensen B, Vandevelde M. Immunofluorescence studies of canine distemper encephalitis on paraffin-embedded tissue. Am J Vet Res. 1978;39:1017–1021. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Higgins RJ, Krakowka SG, Metzler AE, Koestner A. Primary demyelination in experimental canine distemper virus induced encephalomyelitis in gnotobiotic dogs. Sequential immunologic and morphologic findings. Acta Neuropathol. 1982;58:1–8. doi: 10.1007/BF00692691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zurbriggen A, Vandevelde M, Dumas M, Griot C, Bollo E. Oligodendroglial pathology in canine distemper virus infection in vitro. Acta Neuropathol. 1987;74:366–373. doi: 10.1007/BF00687214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mutinelli F, Vandevelde M, Griot C, Richard A. Astrocytic infection in canine distemper virus-induced demyelination. Acta Neuropathol. 1988;77:333–335. doi: 10.1007/BF00687587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Glaus T, et al. Ultrastructural and biochemical findings in brain cell cultures infected with canine distemper virus. Acta Neuropathol. 1990;80:59–67. doi: 10.1007/BF00294222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Muller CF, Fatzer RS, Beck K, Vandevelde M, Zurbriggen A. Studies on canine distemper virus persistence in the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol. 1995;89:438–445. doi: 10.1007/BF00307649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Vandevelde M, Zurbriggen A. Demyelination in canine distemper virus infection: a review. Acta Neuropathol. 2005;109:56–68. doi: 10.1007/s00401-004-0958-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Brunner JM, et al. Canine distemper virus infection of primary hippocampal cells induces increase in extracellular glutamate and neurodegeneration. J Neurochem. 2007;103:1184–1195. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04819.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Noyce RS, et al. Tumor cell marker PVRL4 (nectin 4) is an epithelial cell receptor for measles virus. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1002240. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Muhlebach MD, et al. Adherens junction protein nectin-4 is the epithelial receptor for measles virus. Nature. 2011;480:530–533. doi: 10.1038/nature10639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zurbriggen A, Schmid I, Graber HU, Vandevelde M. Oligodendroglial pathology in canine distemper. Acta Neuropathol. 1998;95:71–77. doi: 10.1007/s004010050767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Rudd PA, Cattaneo R, von Messling V. Canine distemper virus uses both the anterograde and the hematogenous pathway for neuroinvasion. J Virol. 2006;80:9361–9370. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01034-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Abdullah H, Brankin B, Brady C, Cosby SL. Wild-type measles virus infection upregulates poliovirus receptor-related 4 and causes apoptosis in brain endothelial cells by induction of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2013;72:681–696. doi: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e31829a26b6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Fujita K, et al. Host range and receptor utilization of canine distemper virus analyzed by recombinant viruses: Involvement of heparin-like molecule in CDV infection. Virology. 2007;359:324–335. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2006.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Schmid E, et al. Antibodies to CD9, a tetraspantransmembrane protein, inhibits canine distemper virus-induced cell-cell fusion but not virus-cell fusion. J Virol. 2000;74:7554–7561. doi: 10.1128/JVI.74.16.7554-7561.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Singethan K, et al. CD9-dependent regulation of Canine distemper virus-induced cell–cell fusion segregates with the extracellular domain of the haemagglutinin. J Gen Virol. 2006;87:1635–1642. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.81629-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Chen J, Liang X, Chen P. Canine distemper virus utilizes different receptors to infect chicken embryo fibroblasts and Vero cells. Virol Sin. 2011;26:139–145. doi: 10.1007/s12250-011-3176-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Makhortova NR, et al. Neurokinin-1 enables measles virus trans-synaptic spread in neurons. J Virol. 2007;362:235–244. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2007.02.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Techangamsuwan S, et al. Pathologic and molecular virologic characterization of a canine distemper outbreak in farmed civets. Vet Pathol. 2015;52:724–731. doi: 10.1177/0300985814551580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.