Abstract
The aim of the present study was to investigate the prognostic significance of the expression of transcription factors, c-Fos, c-Jun and transmembrane protein CD147, in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB). The current study investigated the clinical significance of these factors in the development, progression and survival analysis of UCB. Immunohistochemistry was employed to analyze c-Fos, c-Jun and CD147 expression in 41 UCB cases and 34 non-cancerous human bladder tissues. These results were scored in a semi-quantitative manner based on the intensity and percentage of tumor cells that presented immunoreactivity. Protein levels of CD147, c-Fos and c-Jun expression were upregulated in 22 (53.7%), 10 (24.4%) and 9 (22.0%) UCB cases, respectively. High levels of c-Jun correlated with the AJCC cancer staging manual (7th edition; P=0.038). Univariate analysis revealed that upregulated CD147 (P=0.038) or c-Jun (P=0.008) was associated with poor overall survival (OS), respectively. Further analysis revealed that either CD147-c-Fos-c-Jun co-expression (P=0.004), or CD147-c-Jun co-expression (P=0.037) and c-Fos-c-Jun co-expression (P<0.001) were associated with poor OS. Multivariate analysis suggested that either upregulation of CD147, c-Jun or c-Fos were independent risk indicators for death in UCB patients. Increased expression of c-Jun or CD147, as well as co-expression of CD147-c-Jun, c-Jun-c-Fos or CD147-c-Jun-c-Fos has prognostic significance for UCB patients. Therefore, high CD147 and c-Jun expression may serve roles in tumor progression and may be diagnostic and therapeutic targets in UCB whether alone or in combination.
Keywords: CD147, c-Jun, c-Fos, urothelial carcinoma of the bladder
Introduction
Bladder cancer is the second most common urologic malignancy amongst males (1). In 2015 in the United States, it was estimated that there were 74,000 new cases of bladder cancer and 16,000 deaths (2). Transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) or urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) account for 90% of all bladder cancer cases, and are divided in 2 variants: non-muscle invasive or muscle invasive. The non-muscle invasive form has a high rate of recurrence (50%), and it progresses to muscle invasive form in ~11% of the cases (3). Despite advances in multi-treatment approaches, including surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, the clinical outcomes of bladder cancer patients remain unsatisfactory (4,5). This is due to considerable tumor variability and heterogeneity, even within the same pathological stage. Predicting a prognosis by examining the clinicopathological characteristics remains difficult. Therefore, identification of novel prognostic factors with high sensitivity and specificity is important to evaluate the prognosis of UCB and individualize treatment strategies.
CD147 is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily. It is widely expressed in human tumors and plays a central role in the progression of many cancers by stimulating the secretion of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and cytokines (6). CD147 regulates cell proliferation, apoptosis, metastasis, differentiation and chemical drug resistance (6). In addition, recent studies have demonstrated that the level of CD147 is associated with the prognosis of patients in many cancers (6). Furthermore, CD147 is recognized as an effective therapeutic target for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (7,8) and additional cancers (9,10), and exciting clinical progress has been made in HCC treatment with CD147-directed monoclonal antibodies (11).
The activator protein-1 transcription factor, AP-1, is principally composed of homodimers of the Jun family (c-Jun, JunB and JunD), heterodimers of the members of Fos (c-Fos, FosB, Fra-1 and Fra-2) and Jun, or cAMP response element-binding protein/activating transcription factor family members (12). Homo- or hetero- forms of the AP-1 complex can activate target gene expression by binding to 12-O-Tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate-(or TPA)-responsive elements, which are also known as AP-1 sites (consensus sequence, 5-TGAG/CTCA-3), in promoter or enhancer regions (12). Evidence has demonstrated that AP-1 serves an important role in inflammation, cellular migration, metastasis and cell proliferation, apoptosis and transformation (13). More importantly, several studies have revealed that the AP-1 complex is involved in carcinogenesis of various tumor types, such as ovarian cancer, breast cancer and skin cancer. For example, c-Fos has been identified as independent predictor of decreased survival in breast cancer (14). High levels of c-Fos expression are associated with high-grade lesions and poor prognosis in osteosarcoma and endometrial carcinoma (15,16). High levels of c-Jun protein have been identified in 31% of primary and metastatic lung tumors (17). In breast cancer, activated c-Jun is expressed predominantly at the invasive front of breast cancer and is associated with proliferation and angiogenesis (18). However, there has been little research into the levels of c-Jun and c-Fos in patients with urothelial carcinoma of bladder tissues.
In the present study, the prognostic significance of c-Fos, c-Jun and CD147 expression was examined by performing immunohistochemistry with a tissue microarray of samples from 41 patients with UCB. In addition, the correlation between c-Fos, c-Jun and CD147 expression in UCB was investigated to supply more reliable judgments of the prognosis of UCB patients.
Materials and methods
Patients and tissues
A total of 41 bladder cancer tissues with histologically confirmed UCB were obtained from the Shanghai Outdo Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) from May 2007 to November 2011, and 34 para-cancer normal tissues, which were 5 cm far away from the edge of the tumor, were randomly selected as controls. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Fourth Military Medical University (Xi'an, China). Following transurethral resection and partial or radical cystectomy therapy, all patients were available for follow-up data and provided written and informed consent. Clinical pathological information was obtained from patients' operative and pathological reports, and included: Sex, age, recurrence, metastasis, invasion tumor size and growth pattern, WHO grade, TNM stage, AJCC stage and survival time.
The study population comprised 35 men (85.4%) and 6 women (14.6%), with a median age at diagnosis of 71 years (range, 44–85 years). The tumor growth type was papillary in 11 patients (26.8%) and nonpapillary in 30 patients (73.2%); low-grade tumors were observed in 3 patients (7.3%) and high-grade tumors were observed in 38 patients (92.7%). Furthermore, 6 patients (14.6%) had low-stage (Tis) tumors and 35 patients (85.4%) had high-stage tumors (T1, 6; T2, 10; T3, 15; T4a, 4; Table I). There was no recurrence or distant metastasis recorded in all cases. Among these 41 patients, 18 (43.9%) did not survive. The median follow-up period was 35 months (data not shown).
Table I.
CD147 (%) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Factor | +++(n=3) (%) | ++(n=6) (%) | +(n=13) (%) | -(n=19) (%) | P-value | |
Age (y) | ||||||
>71 (n=20) | 1 (5.0) | 2 (10.0) | 7 (35.0) | 10 (50.0) | 0.393 | |
≤71 (n=21) | 2 (9.5) | 4 (19.0) | 6 (28.6) | 9 (42.9) | ||
Sex | ||||||
Male (n=35) | 3 (8.6) | 6 (17.1) | 11 (31.4) | 15 (42.9) | 0.165 | |
Female (n=6) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 2 (33.3) | 4 (66.7) | ||
Growth pattern | ||||||
Papillary (n=11) | 0 (0) | 2 (18.2) | 5 (45.5) | 4 (36.4) | 0.964 | |
Nonpapillary (n=30) | 3 (10.0) | 4 (13.3) | 8 (26.7) | 15 (50.0) | ||
WHO grade | ||||||
Low (n=3) | 0 (0) | 1 (33.3) | 2 (66.7) | 0 (0) | 0.338 | |
High (n=38) | 3 (7.9) | 5 (13.2) | 11 (28.9) | 19 (50.0) | ||
Lymph node invasion | ||||||
Negative (n=37) | 2 (5.4) | 6 (16.2) | 10 (27.0) | 19 (51.4) | 0.136 | |
Positive (n=4) | 1 (25.0) | 0 (0) | 3 (75.0) | 0 (0) | ||
TNM stage | ||||||
Low (Tis) (n=6) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 4 (66.7) | 2 (33.3) | 0.649 | |
High (T1-T4a) (n=35) | 3 (8.6) | 6 (17.1) | 9 (25.7) | 17 (48.6) | ||
Tumor diameter | ||||||
>4 cm (n=16) | 0 (0) | 5 (31.3) | 6 (37.5) | 5 (31.3) | 0.355 | |
≤4 cm (n=25) | 3 (12.0) | 1 (4.0) | 7 (28.0) | 14 (56.0) | ||
AJCC cancer staging | ||||||
Tis (n=12) | 1 (8.3) | 1 (8.3) | 4 (33.3) | 6 (50.0) | 0.554 | |
1–2 (n=11) | 0 (0) | 2 (18.2) | 4 (36.4) | 5 (45.5) | ||
3–4 (n=18) | 2 (11.1) | 5 (27.8) | 3 (16.7) | 8 (44.4) | ||
c-Fos (%) | ||||||
Factor | +++(n=0) | ++(n=1) (%) | +(n=9) (%) | −(n=31)(%) | P-value | |
Age (y) | ||||||
>71 (n=20) | – | 0 (0) | 6 (30.0) | 14 (70.0) | 0.693 | |
≤71 (n=21) | – | 1 (4.8) | 3 (14.3) | 17 (81.0) | ||
Sex | ||||||
Male (n=35) | – | 1 (2.9) | 6 (17.1) | 28 (80.0) | 0.220 | |
Female (n=6) | – | 0 (0) | 3 (50.0) | 3 (50.0) | ||
Growth pattern | ||||||
Papillary (n=11) | – | 1 (9.1) | 1 (9.1) | 9 (81.8) | 0.973 | |
Nonpapillary (n=30) | – | 0 (0) | 8 (26.7) | 22 (73.3) | ||
WHO grade | ||||||
Low (n=3) | – | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 3 (100.0) | 0.336 | |
High (n=38) | – | 1 (2.6) | 9 (23.7) | 28 (73.7) | ||
Lymph node invasion | ||||||
Negative (n=37) | – | 1 (2.7) | 7 (18.9) | 29 (78.4) | 0.330 | |
Positive (n=4) | – | 0 (0) | 2 (50.0) | 2 (50.0) | ||
TNM stage | ||||||
Low (Tis) (n=6) | – | 1 (16.7) | 0 (0) | 5 (83.3) | 0.731 | |
High (T1-T4a) (n=35) | – | 0 (0) | 9 (25.7) | 26 (74.3) | ||
Tumor diameter | ||||||
>4 cm (n=16) | – | 1 (6.3) | 3 (18.8) | 12 (75.0) | 0.651 | |
≤4 cm (n=25) | – | 0 (0) | 6 (24.0) | 19 (76.0) | ||
AJCC cancer staging | ||||||
Tis (n=12) | – | 1 (8.3) | 2 (16.7) | 9 (75.0) | 0.552 | |
1–2 (n=11) | – | 0 (0) | 3 (27.3) | 8 (72.7) | ||
3–4 (n=18) | – | 0 (0) | 4 (22.2) | 14 (77.8) | ||
c-Jun (%) | ||||||
Factor | +++ (n=0) | ++ (n=0) | + (n=9) (%) | − (n=32) (%) | P-value | |
Age (y) | ||||||
>71 (n=20) | – | – | 2 (10.0) | 18 (90.0) | 0.130 | |
≤71 (n=21) | – | – | 7 (33.3) | 14 (66.7) | ||
Sex | ||||||
Male (n=35) | – | – | 8 (22.9) | 27 (77.1) | 1.000 | |
Female (n=6) | – | – | 1 (16.7) | 5 (83.3) | ||
Growth pattern | ||||||
Papillary (n=11) | – | – | 2 (18.2) | 9 (81.8) | 1.000 | |
Nonpapillary (n=30) | – | – | 7 (23.3) | 23 (76.7) | ||
WHO grade | ||||||
Low (n=3) | – | – | 0 (0) | 3 (100) | 1.000 | |
High (n=38) | – | – | 9 (23.7) | 29 (76.3) | ||
Lymph node invasion | ||||||
Negative (n=37) | – | – | 7 (18.9) | 30 (81.1) | 0.204 | |
Positive (n=4) | – | – | 2 (50.00) | 2 (50.0) | – | |
TNM stage | ||||||
Low (Tis) (n=6) | – | – | 2 (33.3) | 4 (66.7) | 0.597 | |
High (T1-T4a) (n=35) | – | – | 7 (20.0) | 28 (80.0) | – | |
Tumor diameter | ||||||
>4 cm (n=16) | – | – | 5 (31.3) | 11 (68.8) | 0.276 | |
≤4 cm (n=25) | – | – | 4 (16.0) | 21 (84.0) | – | |
AJCC cancer staging | ||||||
Tis (n=12) | – | – | 1 (8.3) | 11 (91.7) | 0.038 | |
1–2 (n=11) | – | – | 1 (9.1) | 10 (90.9) | – | |
3–4 (n=18) | – | – | 7 (38.9) | 11 (61.1) | – | |
– | – | – | – | – |
WHO, World Health Organization; TNM, tumor node metastasis; AJCC, the 7th American Joint Committee on Cancer; -, Negative.
Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining and evaluation
The expression of c-Jun, c-Fos and CD147 was detected by IHC staining. Briefly, 5 µm sections were cut from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. Following deparaffinization and dehydration, sections were heated in an autoclave (~120°C, 200 kPa, 2 to 6 min,) in 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for antigen retrieval, and treated with 3% H2O2 for 20 min to block the peroxidase. Sections were blocked in 5% goat serum in PBS, followed by overnight incubation at 4°C with anti-c-Jun antibody (1:100 dilution; cat. no. #9165 Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA), anti-c-Fos antibody (1:500 dilution; cat. no. #2251; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) andanti-CD147 antibody (1:167 dilution; cat. no. #201508; Cell Engineering Research Center, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China). The signal was detected with streptavidin-peroxidase staining kits (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) and DAB substrate (ZSGB-BIO., Beijing, China). All sections were then counterstained with Mayer's hematoxylin (0.1%) for 5 to 8 min at room temperature (cat. no #715012; Baso Diagnostics, Inc., Zhuhai, Guangdong, China) and then mounted.
Images were taken with an inverted microscope (CKX41; Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a digital camera under ×100 and ×400 magnification. Two pathologists evaluated the results independently, with no knowledge of clinicopathological features.
The expression of c-Jun, c-Fos and CD147 were scored in a semi-quantitative manner according both the extent and the intensity of the staining: IHC negative, absent; IHC +, faint or weak intensity in >10% of cancer cells; IHC ++, moderate intensity in >10% of cancer cells; and IHC +++, strong intensity in >10% of cancer cells.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version, 17.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The relationship between the level of three proteins (c-Fos, c-Jun and CD147) and clinicopathological features was analyzed with chi-squared statistical test (linear-by-linear association or the Fisher exact test) or Spearman correlation analysis, while overall survival (OS) analysis was carried out using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the Log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazards regression model served to identify relevant prognostic factors. All P-values were two sided and P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
The expression characteristicss of c-Jun, c-Fos and CD147 in UCB and normal tissues
A total of 9 of 41 (22.0%) UCB tissues and 1 of 34 (8.8%) para-cancer tissues presented positive staining of c-Jun, respectively. Tumor staining of c-Jun expression was observed in the nucleus staining pattern (Fig. 1), however, only negative or weak immunoreactivity of c-Jun was detected in para-cancer tissues, which indicated that positive c-Jun was more commonly expressed in human UCB than para-cancer tissues (P=0.017; Fig. 1).
Following IHC in UCB tissues, 10 of 41 cases (24.4%) presented c-Fos staining, which was strong in 1 case (2+ or higher, 2.4%), and weak in 9 cases (1+, 22.0%). The other tissues, including 31 (75.6%) UCB and 13 of 34 (38.2%) normal bladder tissues, demonstrated no staining. Tumor staining of c-Fos expression was observed in the nucleus staining pattern (Fig. 1).
CD147 immunoreaction positive (+, ++, +++) was observed in the 22 cases (53.7%) and most tumor cells with diffuse plasma membranous staining of CD147, while none of normal urothelial cells expressed CD147 (Fig. 1), which indicated that the CD147 was more common high expression in human UCB than that in para-cancer normal tissues (P<0.001; Fig. 1).
A weak inverse correlation was identified (rho=−0.310, P=0.049; Table II) existed in 41 UCB patients between c-Fos expression (negative, +, ++) and CD147 expression (negative, +, ++, +++). However, neither c-Fos expression (rho =0.233, P=0.142) nor CD147 (rho =0.024, P=0.881) expression had significant association with c-Jun expression (negative, +).
Table II.
CD147 | c-Jun | c-Fos | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Marker | rho | P-value | rho | P-value | rho | P-value |
CD147 | – | – | 0.024 | 0.881 | −0.310 | 0.049 |
c-Jun | 0.024 | 0.881 | – | – | 0.233 | 0.142 |
c-Fos | −0.310 | 0.049 | 0.233 | 0.142 | – | – |
Clinicopathological parameter relevance and survival analysis
The protein expression of c-Jun was significantly associated with AJCC cancer staging (P=0.038), while other clinicopathological factors, including age, sex, growth pattern, WHO grade, lymph nodes invasion, tumor node metastatis (TNM) stage and tumor size, had no apparent relationship with c-Jun, c-Fos or CD147 expression (Table I). Neither CD147-c-Jun co-expression (5 cases in 41 UCB patients, 12.2%), CD147-c-Fos co-expression (2 in 41 UCB patients, 5.0%), nor c-Fos-c-Jun co-expression (4 in 41 UCB patients, 9.8%) were associated with any clinicopathological parameters (Table III).
Table III.
CD147-c-Jun co-expression | |||
---|---|---|---|
Factor | Co-expression (n=5) (%) | Non-co-expression (n=36) (%) | P-value |
Age (y) | |||
>71 (n=20) | 2 (10.0) | 18 (90.0) | 1.000 |
≤71 (n=21) | 3 (14.3) | 18 (85.7) | |
Sex | |||
Male (n=35) | 5 (14.3) | 30 (85.7) | 1.000 |
Female (n=6) | 0 (0) | 6 (100) | |
Growth pattern | |||
Papillary (n=11) | 1 (9.1) | 10 (90.9) | 1.000 |
Nonpapillary (n=30) | 4 (13.3) | 26 (86.7) | |
WHO grade | |||
Low (n=3) | 0 (0) | 5 (100) | 1.000 |
High (n=38) | 5 (13.2) | 33 (86.8) | |
Lymph nodes invasion | |||
Negative (n=37) | 5 (13.5) | 32 (86.5) | 1.000 |
Positive (n=4) | 0 (0) | 4 (100) | |
TNM stage | |||
Low (Tis) (n=6) | 0 (0) | 6 (100) | 1.000 |
High (T1-T4a) (n=35) | 5 (14.3) | 30 (85.7) | |
Tumor diameter | |||
>4 cm (n=16) | 0 (0) | 16 (100) | 0.137 |
≤4 cm (n=25) | 5 (20.0) | 20 (80.0) | |
AJCC cancer staging | |||
Tis (n=12) | 0 (0) | 12 (100) | 0.068 |
1–2 (n=11) | 1 (9.1) | 10 (90.9) | |
3–4 (n=18) | 4 (22.2) | 14 (77.8) | |
CD147-c-Fos co-expression | |||
Factor | Co-expression (n=2) (%) | Non-co-expression (n=39) (%) | P-value |
Age (y) | |||
>71 (n=20) | 2 (10.0) | 18 (90.0) | 0.232 |
≤71 (n=21) | 0 (0) | 21 (100) | |
Sex | |||
Male (n=35) | 2 (5.7) | 33 (94.3) | 1.000 |
Female (n=6) | 0 (0) | 6 (100) | |
Growth pattern | |||
Papillary (n=11) | 2 (18.2) | 9 (81.8) | 0.067 |
Nonpapillary (n=30) | 0 (0) | 30 (100) | |
WHO grade | |||
Low (n=3) | 0 (0) | 3 (100) | 1.000 |
High (n=38) | 2 (5.3) | 36 (94.7) | |
Lymph nodes invasion | |||
Negative (n=37) | 2 (5.4) | 35 (94.6) | 1.000 |
Positive (n=4) | 0 (0) | 4 (100) | |
TNM stage | |||
Low (Tis) (n=6) | 0 (0) | 6 (100) | 1.000 |
High (T1-T4a) (n=35) | 2 (5.7) | 33 (94.3) | |
Tumor diameter | |||
>4 cm (n=16) | 1 (6.2) | 15 (93.8) | 1.000 |
≤4 cm (n=25) | 1 (4.0) | 24 (96.0) | |
AJCC cancer staging | |||
Tis (n=12) | 0 (0) | 12 (100) | 0.548 |
1–2 (n=11) | 1 (9.1) | 10 (90.9) | |
3–4 (n=18) | 1 (5.6) | 17 (94.4) | |
c-Fos-c-Jun co-expression | |||
Factor | Co-expression (n=4) (%) | Non-co-expression (n=37) (%) | P-value |
Age (y) | |||
>71 (n=20) | 1 (5.0) | 19 (95.0) | 0.606 |
≤71 (n=21) | 3 (14.3) | 18 (85.7) | |
Sex | |||
Male (n=35) | 3 (8.6) | 32 (91.4) | 0.483 |
Female (n=6) | 1 (16.7) | 5 (83.3) | |
Growth pattern | |||
Papillary (n=11) | 0 (0) | 11 (100) | 0.559 |
Nonpapillary (n=30) | 4 (13.3) | 26 (86.7) | |
WHO grade | |||
Low (n=3) | 0 (0) | 3 (100) | 1.000 |
High (n=38) | 4 (10.5) | 34 (89.5) | |
Lymph nodes invasion | |||
Negative (n=37) | 4 (10.8) | 33 (89.2) | 1.000 |
Positive (n=4) | 0 (0) | 4 (100) | |
TNM stage | |||
Low (Tis) (n=6) | 0 (0) | 6 (100) | 1.000 |
High (T1-T4a) (n=35) | 4 (11.4) | 31 (88.6) | |
Tumor diameter | |||
>4 cm (n=16) | 0 (0) | 16 (100) | 0.143 |
≤4 cm (n=25) | 4 (16.0) | 21 (84.0) | |
AJCC cancer staging | |||
Tis (n=12) | 1 (8.3) | 11 (91.7) | 0.383 |
1–2 (n=11) | 0 (0) | 11 (100) | |
3–4 (n=18) | 3 (16.7) | 15 (83.3) |
WHO, World Health Organization; TNM, tumor node metastasis; AJCC, the 7th American Joint Committee on Cancer.
Univariate survival analyses revealed that high CD147 expression (P=0.038), high c-Jun expression (P=0.008) and high WHO grade (P<0.001; data not shown) were associated with poor OS, whereas high c-Fos expression did not significantly correlate with poor OS for UCB (P=0.225; Fig. 2A-C). Further analysis revealed that either CD147-c-Fos-c-Jun co-expression (P=0.004) or CD147-c-Jun co-expression (P=0.037) and c-Fos-c-Jun co-expression (P<0.001) were also associated with poor OS (Fig. 2D-F). Therefore, it was considered that OS was better in patients who had c-Fos, c-Jun and CD147 all negative expression, or only one of them positive than in those who had double positive or triple positive expression (P=0.008; Fig. 2H).
Multivariate analyses (Table IV) demonstrated that high CD147 expression (hazard ratio [HR]=6.889; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.315–36.084; P=0.022), high c-Fos expression (HR=4.636; 95% CI:1.128–19.057; P=0.033), high c-Jun (HR=4.589; 95% CI:1.172–17.968; P=0.029) and even male sex (HR=0.140; 95% CI:0.027–0.732; P=0.020) were independent predictors for poor OS.
Table IV.
95% CI for HR | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Marker | Risk factor | P-value | HR | Lower | Upper |
Sex | Male | 0.020 | 0.140 | 0.027 | 0.732 |
CD147 | Positive | 0.022 | 6.889 | 1.315 | 36.084 |
c-Fos | Positive | 0.033 | 4.636 | 1.128 | 19.057 |
c-Jun | Positive | 0.029 | 4.589 | 1.172 | 17.968 |
CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.
Discussion
The present study demonstrated that increased expression of c-Jun or CD147 proteins was predictive of poor OS for UCB, although c-Fos protein was not significantly associated with OS. Furthermore, both CD147 and c-Jun positive expression, or all positive expression of c-Fos, c-Jun and CD147, served as an index of poor OS for UCB. All above indicated that overexpression of c-Jun and CD147, perhaps including c-Fos may contribute to tumor progression of UCB.
Many genetic factors have been identified as being associated with bladder cancer (19,20). However, not much is understood regarding the molecular mechanisms of its tumorigenesis and tumor progression. CD147 expressed by tumor cells stimulates peritumoral fibroblasts to produce matrix metalloproteinases, thus contributing to tumor invasion and metastasis (21). Previous studies have highlighted the pivotal role of CD147 protein in carcinogenesis and tumor progression. CD147 expression in breast carcinomas is associated with risk factors such as poor histological grade, negative hormone status, the mitotic index and tumor size (22). High CD147 immunostaining scores in hepatocellular carcinomas correlate significantly with tumor grading and tumor-node-metastasis stages (22). It is reported that CD147 is involved in a regulatory loop of miRNA and transcription factors in breast cancer invasion and metastasis (23). In gastric carcinoma, CD147 expression is positively correlated with tumor size, depth of invasion and lymphatic invasion, but not with lymph node metastasis, staging, or differentiation (24). Previous studies of the authors have demonstrated that CD147 may be involved in the progression of prostate cancer and renal cell carcinoma, and can be used as an independent prognostic factor of these cancers (21,25). However, CD147 protein expression patterns within esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and dysplastic lesions are not associated with any of these clinicopathologic factors (26). In the present study, the results indicated that CD147 was overexpressed in human bladder cancer. However, intense expression of CD147 in bladder cancer was not significantly correlated with the TNM stage, WHO grade and tumor size (Table I), which disaccorded with the results of Riethdorf et al (27). In addition, Riethdorf's study identified that the expression levels of CD147 in invasive transitional cell carcinomas of bladder were higher than those in noninvasive tumors (27). These discrepancies suggest that there are different clinical features of CD147 expression in bladder cancer cells of different patients of UCB, in consideration of all cases in the current study with no recurrence and metastasis following transurethral resection and partial or radical cystectomy therapy. It has already been demonstrated that CD147 overexpression is associated with poorer outcome and shorter survival time in patients with solid tumors (28,29). The present findings supported this hypothesis, as CD147 expression was associated with poor survival in univariate analysis (Fig. 2). Cumulatively, these results indicated that CD147 may be one of the key molecular markers to identify high risk of progression in bladder cancer, but other key molecules involved in tumor progression such as transcription factors must be identified to develop more effective therapeutic targets and to supply more reliable judgments of the prognosis of UCB patients. The study of Hagemann et al (30) demonstrated that CD147 activates multiple transcription factors, including AP-1 (c-Fos, c-Jun and FosB) and NF-κB in cardiomyocytes. The AP-1 complex consists of two elements, c-Fos and c-Jun (31). The AP-1 complex has been implicated in the transformation and progression of cancer (32). Although a few studies have discovered some alternative activities of c-Jun like anti-cancer property (33), most research suggests that c-Jun contributes to tumor initiation and increased invasiveness (18,34). In breast cancer, high expression levels of c-Jun in MCF-7 cells can result in an overall increased invasion by increased cellular motility and increased expression of MMP-9 (35). The observed phenotype for MCF-7 cells with c-Jun overexpression is similar to that observed clinically in advanced breast cancer, which had become hormone unresponsive (36). The other most common element of the AP-1 complex, c-Fos, has also been identified as independent predictor of poor survival in breast cancer (14). CD147 has been regarded as a prognostic marker for breast cancer with MMP-9 (37). It seems that there is a reason to examine the hypothesis that c-Jun and CD147, and even c-Fos, are involved in the progression of the human urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, according to the present study results and other previously-mentioned studies. However, future research should aim to elucidate the mechanism of c-Jun, c-Fos and CD147 in bladder cancer progression by enlarging sample size, and studying in in vitro and in vivo models.
The present study indicated that increased expression of the c-Jun and CD147 proteins, as well as co-expression of CD147-c-Jun, c-Jun-c-Fos, or CD147-c-Jun-c-Fos has prognostic significance for UCB patients. Therefore, high CD147 and c-Jun expression may serve roles in UCB progression and may be diagnostic and therapeutic targets in UCB whether alone or in combination.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from National Science and Technology Major Project (grant no. 2013ZX09301301) and National High Technology Research and Development Program (grant no. 2015CB553701).
References
- 1.Sharma S, Ksheersagar P, Sharma P. Diagnosis and treatment of bladder cancer. Am Fam Physician. 2009;80:717–723. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:5–29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Van Tilborg AA, Bangma CH, Zwarthoff EC. Bladder cancer biomarkers and their role in surveillance and screening. Int J Urol. 2009;16:23–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02174.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Giuliani L, Giberti C, Martorana G, Bonamini A, Natta GD, Rovida S. Results of radical cystectomy for primary bladder cancer. Retrospective study of more than 200 cases. Urology. 1985;26:243–248. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(85)90119-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pagano F, Bassi P, Galetti TP, Meneghini A, Milani C, Artibani W, Garbeglio A. Results of contemporary radical cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer: A clinicopathological study with an emphasis on the inadequacy of the tumor, nodes and metastases classification. The J Urol. 1991;145:45–50. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38244-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Xiong L, Edwards CK, III, Zhou L. The biological function and clinical utilization of CD147 in human diseases: A review of the current scientific literature. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15:17411–17441. doi: 10.3390/ijms151017411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhu S, Li Y, Zhang Y, Wang X, Gong L, Han X, Yao L, Lan M, Zhang W. Expression and clinical implications of HAb18G/CD147 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res. 2015;45:97–106. doi: 10.1111/hepr.12320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Xu J, Xu HY, Zhang Q, Song F, Jiang JL, Yang XM, Mi L, Wen N, Tian R, Wang L, et al. HAb18G/CD147 functions in invasion and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Cancer Res. 2007;5:605–614. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-06-0286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Xu XY, Lin N, Li YM, Zhi C, Shen H. Expression of HAb18G/CD147 and its localization correlate with the progression and poor prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer. Pathol Res Pract. 2013;209:345–352. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2013.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bhagirath D, Abrol N, Khan R, Sharma M, Seth A, Sharma A. Expression of CD147, BIGH3 and Stathmin and their potential role as diagnostic marker in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Clin Chim Acta. 2012;413:1641–1646. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2012.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bian H, Zheng JS, Nan G, Li R, Chen C, Hu CX, Zhang Y, Sun B, Wang XL, Cui SC, et al. Randomized trial of [131I] metuximab in treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106:239. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hess J, Angel P, Schorpp-Kistner M. AP-1 subunits: Quarrel and harmony among siblings. J Cell Sci. 2004;117:5965–5973. doi: 10.1242/jcs.01589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ye N, Ding Y, Wild C, Shen Q, Zhou J. Small molecule inhibitors targeting activator protein 1 (AP-1) J Med Chem. 2014;57:6930–6948. doi: 10.1021/jm5004733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mahner S, Baasch C, Schwarz J, Hein S, Wölber L, Jänicke F, Milde-Langosch K. C-Fos expression is a molecular predictor of progression and survival in epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2008;99:1269–1275. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bamberger AM, Milde-Langosch K, Rössing E, Goemann C, Löning T. Expression pattern of the AP-1 family in endometrial cancer: Correlations with cell cycle regulators. J Cancer Res Clin Oncology. 2001;127:545–550. doi: 10.1007/s004320100255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gamberi G, Benassi MS, Bohling T, Ragazzini P, Molendini L, Sollazzo MR, Pompetti F, Merli M, Magagnoli G, Balladelli A, Picci P. C-myc and c-fos in human osteosarcoma: Prognostic value of mRNA and protein expression. Oncology. 1998;55:556–563. doi: 10.1159/000011912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Szabo E, Riffe ME, Steinberg SM, Birrer MJ, Linnoila RI. Altered cJUN expression: An early event in human lung carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 1996;56:305–315. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Vleugel MM, Greijer AE, Bos R, van der Wall E, van Diest PJ. c-Jun activation is associated with proliferation and angiogenesis in invasive breast cancer. Human Pathol. 2006;37:668–674. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2006.01.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gromova I, Gromov P, Celis JE. bc10: A novel human bladder cancer-associated protein with a conserved genomic structure downregulated in invasive cancer. Int J Cancer. 2002;98:539–546. doi: 10.1002/ijc.10244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Moreira JM, Gromov P, Celis JE. Expression of the tumor suppressor protein 14-3-3 sigma is down-regulated in invasive transitional cell carcinomas of the urinary bladder undergoing epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2004;3:410–419. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M300134-MCP200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Han ZD, He HC, Bi XC, Qin WJ, Dai QS, Zou J, Ye YK, Liang YX, Zeng GH, Zhu G, et al. Expression and clinical significance of CD147 in genitourinary carcinomas. J Surg Res. 2010;160:260–267. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2008.11.838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhong WD, Chen QB, Ye YK, Han ZD, Bi XC, Dai QS, Liang YX, Zeng GH, Wang YS, Zhu G, et al. Extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer expression has an impact on survival in human bladder cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. 2010;34:478–482. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2010.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kong LM, Liao CG, Zhang Y, Xu J, Li Y, Huang W, Zhang Y, Bian H, Chen ZN. A regulatory loop involving miR-22, Sp1, and c-Myc modulates CD147 expression in breast cancer invasion and metastasis. Cancer Res. 2014;74:3764–3778. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-3555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zheng HC, Takahashi H, Murai Y, Cui ZG, Nomoto K, Miwa S, Tsuneyama K, Takano Y. Upregulated EMMPRIN/CD147 might contribute to growth and angiogenesis of gastric carcinoma: A good marker for local invasion and prognosis. Br J Cancer. 2006;95:1371–1378. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Liang YX, He HC, Han ZD, Bi XC, Dai QS, Ye YK, Qin WJ, Zeng GH, Zhu G, Xu CL, Zhong WD. CD147 and VEGF expression in advanced renal cell carcinoma and their prognostic value. Cancer Invest. 2009;27:788–793. doi: 10.1080/07357900802709167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ishibashi Y, Matsumoto T, Niwa M, Suzuki Y, Omura N, Hanyu N, Nakada K, Yanaga K, Yamada K, Ohkawa K, et al. CD147 and matrix metalloproteinase-2 protein expression as significant prognostic factors in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2004;101:1994–2000. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Riethdorf S, Reimers N, Assmann V, Kornfeld JW, Terracciano L, Sauter G, Pantel K. High incidence of EMMPRIN expression in human tumors. Int J Cancer. 2006;119:1800–1810. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zhong WD, Han ZD, He HC, Bi XC, Dai QS, Zhu G, Ye YK, Liang YX, Qin WJ, Zhang Z, et al. CD147, MMP-1, MMP-2 and MMP-9 protein expression as significant prognostic factors in human prostate cancer. Oncology. 2008;75:230–236. doi: 10.1159/000163852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yu W, Liu J, Xiong X, Ai Y, Wang H. Expression of MMP9 and CD147 in invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix and their implication. Pathol Res Pract. 2009;205:709–715. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2009.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hagemann T, Wilson J, Kulbe H, Li NF, Leinster DA, Charles K, Klemm F, Pukrop T, Binder C, Balkwill FR. Macrophages induce invasiveness of epithelial cancer cells via NF-kappa B and JNK. J Immunol. 2005;175:1197–1205. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.2.1197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bossis G, Malnou CE, Farras R, Andermarcher E, Hipskind R, Rodriguez M, Schmidt D, Muller S, Jariel-Encontre I, Piechaczyk M. Down-regulation of c-Fos/c-Jun AP-1 dimer activity by sumoylation. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:6964–6979. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.16.6964-6979.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ramos-Nino ME, Littenberg B. A novel combination: Ranpirnase and rosiglitazone induce a synergistic apoptotic effect by down-regulating Fra-1 and Survivin in cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2008;7:1871–1879. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-0308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yang CW, Lee YZ, Hsu HY, Wu CM, Chang HY, Chao YS, Lee SJ. c-Jun-mediated anticancer mechanisms of tylophorine. Carcinogenesis. 2013;34:1304–1314. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgt039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Eferl R, Ricci R, Kenner L, Zenz R, David JP, Rath M, Wagner EF. Liver tumor development. c-Jun antagonizes the proapoptotic activity of p53. Cell. 2003;112:181–192. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00042-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Briggs J, Chamboredon S, Castellazzi M, Kerry JA, Bos TJ. Transcriptional upregulation of SPARC, in response to c-Jun overexpression, contributes to increased motility and invasion of MCF7 breast cancer cells. Oncogene. 2002;21:7077–7091. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Smith LM, Wise SC, Hendricks DT, Sabichi AL, Bos T, Reddy P, Brown PH, Birrer MJ. cJun overexpression in MCF-7 breast cancer cells produces a tumorigenic, invasive and hormone resistant phenotype. Oncogene. 1999;18:6063–6070. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zhao S, Ma W, Zhang M, Tang D, Shi Q, Xu S, Zhang X, Liu Y, Song Y, Liu L, Zhang Q. High expression of CD147 and MMP-9 is correlated with poor prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. Med Oncol. 2013;30:335. doi: 10.1007/s12032-012-0335-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]