Predictive value of the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score for the therapeutic effects of molecular-targeted drugs on advanced renal cell carcinoma

Abstract

Inflammation is considered to be a prognostic factor for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). An inflammation-based prognostic score (modified Glasgow Prognostic Score; mGPS) is widely used for preoperative patients; however, little information is available regarding its prognostic value in patients with RCC treated with molecular-targeted drugs. A total of 32 advanced and recurrent RCC patients initially treated with molecular-targeted drugs from October, 2009 to August, 2015 were retrospectively investigated. Information on patient characteristics prior to treatment initiation and the clinical course were retrieved from clinical records. The correlation between survival and patient variables was analyzed. Survival was compared among patient groups according to the mGPS score. The median patient age was 66 years. The percentage of patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 was 87.5, and 65.6% of the RCCs were clear cell carcinomas. A Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center index of good or intermediate was determined for 75% of the patients. Sunitinib, pazopanib or sorafenib was administered to 56, 22 and 13% of the cases, respectively. An mGPS score of 0, 1 and 2 was calculated for 66, 9 and 25% of the cases, respectively. Patients in the mGPS low group (score 0) exhibited significantly better progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with patients in the mGPS high group (score 1 or 2) (median PFS, 307 vs. 70 days and median OS, 1,081 vs. 140 days, respectively). In conclusion, inflammatory status as assessed by the mGPS score was closely associated with the prognosis of RCC patients treated with molecular-targeted therapy.

Introduction

Kidney cancer accounts for ~4% of all cancers worldwide and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common type of kidney cancer (1–3). Radical nephrectomy is usually performed for advanced RCC; however, recurrence with distant metastasis occurs in >25% of the patients (4) and chemotherapy is employed for these metastatic RCC (mRCC) patients. While interleukin (IL)-2 and interferon (IFN)-α have been used for mRCC (5,6), molecular-targeted drugs, such as multi-kinase inhibitors, have been recently developed and exhibit great efficacy for mRCC, resulting in improved survival (7–9). In particular, a pivotal study that investigated sunitinib treatment demonstrated a median overall survival of 32 months for mRCC (10). The current standard therapy for mRCC is thus the first-line use of these molecular-targeted drugs.

To predict the prognosis of mRCC patients treated with IFN-γ, the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) index, which includes measurements of performance status, serum lactate dehydrogenase level, serum calcium level, hemoglobin and time interval from diagnosis to therapy, was established (11). The Heng model was proposed for predicting the prognosis of mRCC patients who were treated with anti-angiogenesis inhibitors and the parameters assayed included neutrophil and platelet counts (12,13). The appropriateness of the index used is based on the acknowledgement of the close association between the clinical course of mRCC and inflammatory status. Increased serum levels of inflammatory cytokines in RCC patients have been reported (14–16), whereas other parameters associated with inflammatory conditions include not only fever, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (17), but also neutrophil and lymphocyte counts (18–21).

Inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1β and IL-6, are known to induce systemic inflammation, alteration of systemic metabolism, atrophy of muscle and fat tissue and loss of appetite and body weight, resulting in cancer cachexia. A strong association between inflammatory status and cachexia has also been reported in cancers of the stomach, lung and pancreas (22–26).

One of the inflammation-based prognostic indices, the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS), is a simple scoring system that is calculated based on serum CRP and albumin levels and has been widely used as a predictive tool for mRCC (27–29). Since the current therapy for mRCC is monotherapy with molecular-targeted agents, determination of the association between the efficacy of these therapies and inflammatory conditions is required. However, the prognostic value of mGPS in mRCC patients treated with molecular-targeted drugs remains unclear. In the present study, we retrospectively investigated the mGPS and the therapeutic effects of molecular-targeted drugs in Japanese patients with advanced RCC in a single institution.

Patients and methods

Patients

A total of 45 RCC patients who were treated at the Department of Medical Oncology, Clinical Research Institute, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center (Fukuoka, Japan) between October, 2009 and August, 2015 were screened. Of these patients, 32 with histologically and/or radiographically confirmed advanced RCC who were treated with a molecular-targeted drug as first-line therapy were investigated. The eligibility criteria were as follows: Measurable or evaluable tumor lesions according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors guidelines, version 1.1 (https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocoldevelopment/docs/recist_guideline.pdf), confirmation of the date of death or progressive disease, and no evidence of active infection. There was no restriction regarding Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) or previous cytokine therapies. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the National Organization Kyushu Medical Center and was conducted according to the guidelines for biomedical research specified in the Declaration of Helsinki. Due to the retrospective nature of the present study, patient informed consent was not obtained.

Clinical variables assessed

Information on patient characteristics and clinical data were retrieved from medical records and retrospectively reviewed. The items surveyed in this study included age, gender, PS, primary tumor site, histopathological diagnosis, metastatic and recurrent sites, tumor status and previous renal surgery. Information regarding systemic chemotherapy included the chemotherapy regimen, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), reasons for terminating initial chemotherapy and subsequent therapies. Information associated with inflammatory conditions included the results of blood tests (white blood cells, neutrophils, lymphocytes, hemoglobin, platelets, albumin and CRP) and the mGPS. All data corresponded to the period within 7 days prior to chemotherapy initiation.

The mGPS consists of two factors, namely ther serum levels of CRP (normal range, 0.00–0.30 mg/dl) and albumin (normal range, 4.0–5.0 g/dl) (30). Patients with an increment in the CRP level (>1.0 mg/dl) and a decrease in the albumin level (<3.5 g/dl) were assigned a score of 2, those with only an increment in the CRP level (>1.0 mg/dl) were assigned a score of 1, and those with a normal serum CRP level were assigned a score of 0.

Statistical analysis

PFS was defined as the period from the initiation of therapy to the day of tumor progression or death from any cause. OS was defined as the period from initiation of therapy to the day of death from any cause. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS and OS, and the log-rank test was used to compare the two groups according to the mGPS. Correlations between survival and clinicopathological characteristics were analyzed by using Wilcoxon's test and Pearson's Chi-square test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate statistically significant differences. All the analyses were performed using SPSS software, version 21 (IBM SPSS, Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

Patient characteristics

The median age of the 32 patients was 66 years (range, 33–82 years) (Table I); 20 men (62.5%) and 12 women (37.5%) were included. In terms of histological diagnosis of the renal tumor, clear cell carcinoma was diagnosed in 21 patients (65.5%); papillary or sarcomatoid cancer was diagnosed in 5 patients (15.6%), and in 6 patients (18.8%) the type of the tumor was unknown. A total of 25 patients (78.1%) underwent surgical resection of RCC; 16 patients (50%) received prior cytokine therapies, including IFN-α and IL-2; the remaining 16 patients had received no prior treatment. An ECOG PS of 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 was observed in 15, 13, 2, 1 and 1 patients (46.9, 40.6, 6.3, 3.1 and 3.1%), respectively. Patients with a PS of 3 or 4 were considered suitable to receive chemotherapy, as their poor PS was attributed to pain from bone metastasis or bone fracture. When the MSKCC risk index was calculated, 1 (3.1%) of the patients was classed as favorable-risk, 23 (71.9%) were intermediate-risk and 8 (25.0%) were poor-risk. When risk was calculated according to the Heng risk group, 1 (3.1%) of the patients were favorable-risk, 20 (62.5%) were intermediate-risk and 11 (34.4%) were poor-risk.

Table I.

Patient characteristics (n=32).

Characteristics	N (%)
Age, years
Mean	65.4
Median (range)	66 (33.0–82.0)
Gender
Male	20 (62.5)
Female	12 (37.5)
Histological type
Clear cell carcinoma	21 (65.6)
Others	5 (15.6)
Unknown	6 (18.8)
Resection of the primary lesion
Present	25 (78.1)
Absent	7 (21.9)
Previous treatment (e.g., cytokines)
Present	16 (50.0)
Absent	16 (50.0)
ECOG performance status
0	15 (46.9)
1	13 (40.6)
2	2 (6.3)
3	1 (3.1)
4	1 (3.1)
MSKCC risk group
Favorable	1 (3.1)
Intermediate	23 (71.9)
Poor	8 (25.0)
Heng risk group
Favorable	1 (3.1)
Intermediate	20 (62.5)
Poor	11 (34.4)
WBC (/µl)
Mean	6,403.1
Median (range)	6,050 (2,100-11,900)
C-reactive protein (mg/dl)
Mean	3.26
Median (range)	0.36 (0.03–21.03)
Albumin (g/dl)
Mean	3.74
Median (range)	3.85 (2.30–4.30)
LDH (mg/dl)
Mean	264.7
Median (range)	189.5 (108.0-2,498.0)
Corrected calcium (mg/dl)
Mean	9.54
Median (range)	9.45 (8.30–12.30)
Creatinine (mg/dl)
Mean	0.94
Median (range)	0.91 (0.40–1.40)
Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio
Mean	5.02
Median (range)	3.12 (0.80–37.80)
Characteristics	N (%)
Modified GPS
0	21 (65.6)
1	3 (9.4)
2	8 (25.0)
Sequential therapy
None	5 (15.6)
Second-line	19 (59.4)
Third- or further-line	9 (28.1)
Progression-free survival (days)
Mean	258
Median (range)	212 (13.0–960.0)
Overall survival (days)
Mean	738
Median (range)	487.5 (30.0-2,137.0)

ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; MSKCC, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; WBC, white blood cell; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; GPS, Glasgow Prognostic Score.

The mean value of the serum CRP level was 3.26 mg/dl and its range was 0.03–21.15 mg/dl, indicating wide variation among patients. A total of 21 patients (65.5%) had an mGPS of 0, 3 (9.4%) had an mGPS of 1, and 8 (25.0%) had an mGPS of 2. A total of 5 patients (15.6%) did not receive subsequent therapy, 19 (59.4%) received up to second-line chemotherapy, and 9 (28.1%) received third- or further-line chemotherapy.

Efficacy

The median PFS of all patients was 212.0 days [95% confidence interval (CI): 13.0–960] and the median OS was 487.5 days (95% CI: 30.0–2,137.0).

Correlation analysis of survival and clinical factors

The correlation between survival and clinical parameters was then examined (Table II). A longer PFS and OS were significantly correlated with the MSKCC risk group, the Heng risk group and PS. Clinical parameters corresponding to inflammatory status, including neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), serum CRP level, serum albumin level and mGPS, were also significantly associated with PFS and OS. The correlation index of the mGPS was the highest (R=0.575, P=0.001) among all of the parameters examined. Receiving subsequent therapies was significantly correlated with PFS (R=0.437, P=0.012), but not with OS (R=0.273, P=0.131).

Table II.

Correlation analysis of survival and clinical factors.

Factors	Progression-free survival	Overall survival
Age	0.247 (0.173)	0.218 (0.232)
Gender	0.059 (0.747)	0.063 (0.732)
Resection of the primary lesion	0.250 (0.168)	0.323 (0.071)
MSKCC risk group	0.451 (0.010)	0.499 (0.004)
Heng risk group	0.427 (0.015)	0.556 (0.001)
Previous treatment	0.152 (0.405)	0.135 (0.460)
ECOG performance	0.523 (0.002)	0.554 (0.001)
status
WBC	0.264 (0.145)	0.261 (0.149)
NLR	0.531 (0.002)	0.533 (0.002)
C-reactive Protein	0.390 (0.027)	0.485 (0.005)
Albumin	0.427 (0.015)	0.613 (<0.0001)
mGPS	0.575 (0.001)	0.591 (<0.0001)
LDH	0.263 (0.146)	0.183 (0.315)
Corrected calcium	0.135 (0.461)	0.065 (0.722)
Creatinine	0.098 (0.592)	0.049 (0.788)
PFS	–	0.743 (<0.0001)
OS	0.743 (<0.0001)	–
Sequential therapy	0.437 (0.012)	0.273 (0.131)

Data are presented as R (P-value). Bold print indicates statistical significance. MSKCC, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; WBC, white blood cell; NLR, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio; mGPS, modified Glasgow Prognostic Score; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival.

Inflammatory conditions and therapeutic effects

Since a correlation of mGPS with survival was demonstrated, PFS and OS were further examined with regard to the mGPS (Fig. 1). The total patients were categorized into one of two groups: Patients with an mGPS of 0 were assigned to the mGPS low group, whereas those with an mGPS of 1 or 2 were assigned to the mGPS high group. The median PFS of the mGPS low group was significantly longer compared with that of the mGPS high group (307.0 vs. 70.0 days, respectively; P=0.001) based on the Kaplan-Meyer analysis. The median OS of the mGPS low group was also significantly longer compared with that of the mGPS high group (1,081.0 vs. 140.0 days, respectively; P=0.001). These data suggested that molecular-targeted drugs achieved a more favorable survival in patients of the mGPS low group, who are considered to be of low inflammatory status.

Figure 1.

Kaplan-Meier curves of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of mGPS low and mGPS high patients. PFS and OS were estimated using log-rank analysis. mGPS, modified Glasgow Prognostic Score. The vertical bars show censored cases. The numbers 70, 307, 140 and 1081 indicate the median number of days for the indicated groups.

Therapy and inflammatory conditions

In order to assess the reasons for the favorable survival of the mGPS low group, each clinical factor was compared between the two mGPS patient groups (Table III). While all the mGPS low patients had an ECOG PS of 0 or 1 (100%), only 63% of the mGPS high patients had a PS of 0 or 1 (P<0.038). An MSKCC poor risk was observed in 10% of the mGPS low patients, but in 55% of mGPS high patients (P<0.018). In terms of histological diagnosis, based on its molecular mechanisms, clear cell carcinoma is considered to be more sensitive to molecular-targeted drugs compared with tumors of other histological types. Clear cell carcinoma was observed in 86% of the mGPS low and in 45% of the mGPS high patients (P<0.05). These results suggested that mGPS high patients included a population with a poor general condition and drug resistance. Regarding initial therapy, sunitinib was administered in 57% of the mGPS low patients and in 54% of the mGPS high patients (P=0.065), suggesting no significant differences between the two groups. Although 63.6% of the mGPS high patients received initial therapy alone, only 5% of the mGPS low patients received initial therapy alone. The percentage of patients who received second-line therapy in the mGPS low and mGPS high groups was 72 and 36%, respectively, and the percentage of patients who received third- or further-line therapy was 33 and 18%, respectively (P=0.003).

Table III.

Therapy and inflammatory status of the mGPS low and high patient groups.

	mGPS low		mGPS high
Variables	n=21	(%)	n=11	(%)	P-value
ECOG PS					0.038a
0	12	57	3	27
1	9	43	4	36
2	0	0	2	18
3	0	0	1	9
4	0	0	1	9
MSKCC					0.018b
Favorable	1	4	0	0
Intermediate	18	86	5	45
Poor	2	10	6	55
Histology					0.018b
CC	18	86	5	45
pRCC	0	0	3	27
Others	3	14	3	27
Therapeutic drugs					0.0647b
Sunitinib	12	57	6	54
Sorefenib	3	14	1	5
Pazopanib	5	24	2	10
Temsirolimus	1	5	2	10
Subsequent therapyc					0.003b
None	1	5	7	64
Second-line	15	72	4	36
Third or further-line	7	33	2	18

^aWilcoxon rank sum test

^bPearson's Chi-square test

^cNone, number of patients, who completed first-line chemotherapy alone, or who are currently receiving first-line therapy; second-line, number of patients who received second-line chemotherapy, or who are currently treated with second-line chemotherapy; third- or further-line, number of patients, who received third- or further-line chemotherapy, or who are currently treated with third- or further-line chemotherapy. Based on the definition of each item, 2 patients are repeatedly counted in both the mGPS low and the mGPS high groups. mGPS, modified Glasgow Prognostic Score; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; MSKCC, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; CC, clear cell; pRCC, papillary renal cell carcinoma.

Discussion

The pathogenesis of RCC has been considered to be closely associated with inflammation. A variety of indices related to inflammation have been reported to exhibit a predictive value for RCC, including serum CRP level, platelet count, NLR (31,32), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (31,33), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (31,34), the prognostic nutritional index (31,35), GPS (29) and mGPS (27). Cytokines and their receptors, such as IL-6 and granulocyte-stimulating factor receptor 1 have also been reported as indices of inflammatory status. Serum CRP and albumin levels were found to be particularly good indicators of inflammatory status. A retrospective evaluation of 406 RCC patients indicated that the CRP/albumin ratio was valuable for the prediction of OS (31). The CRP/albumin ratio was also found to be an independent prognostic factor in hepatocellular (36) and esophageal carcinoma (37).

The present study investigated the mGPS of 32 RCC patients prior to the initial chemotherapy, and the mGPS low patients (score 0) exhibited a favorable prognosis. mGPS is also calculated using serum CRP and albumin levels. Lamb et al reported the predictive value of mGPS based on analyses of 169 RCC patients who received curative resection (27). Previous studies that assessed the predictive value of mGPS were mostly targeted towards the curability of RCC patients who had undergone curative resection. Therefore, there is little information available regarding the predictive value of the mGPS for metastatic or recurrent RCC patients who were treated with molecular-targeted agents. The present findings, indicating a positive correlation between PFS and OS of these RCC patients and their mGPS, strongly suggest a predictive value of mGPS for patients with metastatic or recurrent RCC.

The mechanisms underlying the correlation of inflammatory status with prognosis of metastatic or recurrent RCC have been considered to be as follows: First, since inflammation-associated cytokines may directly induce tumor cell growth, there may be a higher induction of RCC cell proliferation in mGPS high patients compared with that in mGPS low patients. Second, inflammation is often associated with cachexia and deterioration of the patients' general condition, resulting in insufficient administration of chemotherapy. In this study, favorable PFS with first-line chemotherapy in mGPS low patients suggested that the mGPS may be correlated with efficacy of the initial molecular-targeted therapy. One possible reason for this correlation is that the mGPS low patients may have harbored cancer cells with relatively non-aggressive characteristics (low proliferation rate, as mentioned above) that were sensitive to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The cell proliferation of clear cell carcinoma has been reported to depend on vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) signaling and is sensitive to TKIs, which inhibits the effect of VEGFR signaling (7–10). However, the serum CRP level in patients with clear cell carcinoma was found to be higher compared with that in patients with papillary cell carcinoma (38). Although the mGPS low patient group included a higher percentage of clear cell carcinoma patients than the mGPS high patient group in this study, it is not conclusive that the favorable PFS of the mGPS low patients is attributed to the high percentage of clear cell carcinoma patients. The present data also demonstrated that the mGPS low patients tended to exhibit favorable PS and MSKCC. Parameters such as PS and MSKCC are considered to reflect the patients' general status; thus, the longer PFS of the mGPS low patients may also be associated with their better general condition due to a low inflammatory status.

Additionally, the mGPS low patients exhibited longer OS compared with the mGPS high patients. This difference may be associated with the high percentage of patients who were able to receive subsequent chemotherapies. Overall survival following termination of the initial chemotherapy in the mGPS low patients was found to be significantly longer compared with that of the mGPS high patients (median OS, 1,111 days vs. 180 days, respectively; P=0.006). Although no examination of the mGPS of each patient group after termination of the initial chemotherapy was performed, this finding suggested that subsequent chemotherapy may also be effective for mGPS low patients with metastatic and recurrent RCC.

The molecular-targeted drugs that may be suitable for mGPS high patients with metastatic or recurrent RCC must be determined. For this purpose, an understanding of the regulatory mechanisms of inflammation in RCC patients is required. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor suppresses cellular growth of RCC by blocking mTOR-mediated signaling. Cytokine signaling pathways including IL-6, tumor growth factor-β and insulin-like growth factor share the common property of mTOR activation (39,40). Since inhibition of mTOR has been demonstrated to induce muscle protein wasting in cancer cachexia (41,42), it may be suggested that an mTOR inhibitor may be suitable only for mGPS low patients. However, inflammatory cytokines have been reported to suppress the production of VEGF from tumor cells and to regulate the tumor microenvironment (43). Although a direct correlation between inflammatory status and the efficacy of anti-angiogenic therapy has not been reported, molecular-targeted drugs and inflammatory cytokines may exert synergistic effects, and further investigation is required to determine the appropriate therapeutic strategy for RCC patients with a high inflammatory status.

Although the present study was performed in order to retrospectively investigate a small number of patients, superiority of PFS and OS of the mGPS low over the mGPS high patient group was observed. These results are consistent with results from curatively resected RCC patients, and the potential prognostic value of mGPS for metastatic or recurrent RCC patients treated with molecular-targeted agents may be a novel finding.

The present study strongly suggested that inflammatory status prior to the initial chemotherapy is correlated with PFS and OS. Since the possible reasons for the favorable survival of patients with low inflammatory status may include acceleration of tumor growth by inflammation and insufficient administration of chemotherapies due to inflammation, the selection of the appropriate molecular-targeted drugs should be further investigated. Inflammation-related indices, such as the mGPS, reflect the interaction between the host immune system and the tumor. The mGPS may be used not only as a predictive parameter of RCC, but also as a biomarker to monitor the actual inflammatory status in cases of future treatments by immune checkpoint inhibitors.