Abstract
Mutations in the OCRL1 gene result in the oculocerebrorenal syndrome of Lowe, with symptoms including congenital bilateral cataracts, glaucoma, renal failure, and neurological impairments. OCRL1 encodes an inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase which preferentially dephosphorylates phosphatidylinositide 4,5 bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P2). We have identified two novel mutations in two unrelated Lowe syndrome patients with congenital glaucoma. Novel deletion mutations are detected at c.739-742delAAAG in Lowe patient 1 and c.1595-1631del in Lowe patient 2. End stage glaucoma in patient 2 resulted in the enucleation of the eye, which on histology demonstrated corneal keloid, fibrous infiltration of the angle, ectropion uvea, retinal gliosis, and retinal ganglion cell loss. We measured OCRL protein levels in patient keratinocytes and found that Lowe 1 patient cells had significantly reduced OCRL protein as compared to the control keratinocytes. Genotype-phenotype correlation of OCRL1 mutations associated with congenital glaucoma revealed clustering of missense and deletion mutations in the 5-phosphatase domain and the RhoGAP-like domain. In conclusion, we report novel OCRL1 mutations in Lowe syndrome patients and the corresponding histopathologic analysis of one patient’s ocular pathology.
Introduction
The oculocerebrorenal syndrome of Lowe (Lowe syndrome, MIM #309000) is a rare X-linked recessive disease that affects multiple organ systems in male patients1. Nearly all patients are afflicted with congenital cataracts, and many have other conditions including glaucoma in 50% of patients and nystagmus in others2. Ocular manifestations can include corneal keloids and amblyopia, which severely impair vision and visual development in early childhood2. In addition to these ocular findings, Lowe syndrome also causes dysfunction in the kidney and nervous systems3, 4. Renal manifestations include low-molecular-weight proteinuria, renal tubular acidosis, hypercalciuria and aminoaciduria, which may ultimately result in renal failure5, 6. Neurologic signs consist of severe neonatal hypotonia, mental retardation, and an increased susceptibility to seizures3, 7–9. Some patients present with only one of these various phenotypes at birth, which may delay the appropriate diagnosis of the disease10. The classic triad of congenital cataracts, infantile hypotonia with intellectual disability, and proximal renal tubular dysfunction often does not present until later in life11, 12.
The defective gene OCRL1 is located on Xq26.1 and encodes an inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase; its substrates include phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P2) and phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate (PI(3,4,5)P3)13–17. Most of the disease-causing mutations are located either in the phosphatase domain or the c-terminal RhoGAP domain, which may result in the loss of protein due to the lack of expression or degradation as a consequence of misfolding leading to accumulations of phosphoinositide substrates7, 18–22. Currently there have been over 200 mutations that include frameshifts, substitutions, gross inversions, nonsense, and missense mutations, causing a variety of Lowe syndrome phenotypes which range greatly in severity23–30. In our previous study, we identified a novel missense mutation (c.1661 A > C; p. D499A) in an 8-year old male patient diagnosed with Lowe syndrome who presented with bilateral congenital glaucoma and cataracts31. In this paper, we identified two new deletion mutations in two Lowe syndrome patients with congenital glaucoma and discuss the clinical-pathologic correlation in a patient with end-stage glaucoma.
Materials and Methods
Patients and Samples
Two male patients were diagnosed with Lowe syndrome and associated congenital glaucoma at Riley Children’s Hospital, Indianapolis, IN. Patient keratinocyte cell lines were established after informed consent was obtained from the patients’ parents, in accordance with an IRB approved study by Indiana University and is compliant with HIPAA Privacy regulation. The study adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Retinal Imaging
The child’s pupils were dilated with 0.2% cyclopentolate, 0.1% phenylephrine, and 1% cyclopentolate 30 minutes prior to examination under anesthesia. Topical proparacaine (1%) was applied and an eyelid speculum was inserted. Digital images were taken with the RetCam Digital Retinal Camera (Massie Research Laboratories Inc., Pleasanton, CA) using the 130° ROP lens by a study ophthalmologist (DN). All images were stored on the hard-drive of the RetCam machine.
Keratinocyte isolation
Normal human keratinocytes (NHF588) were isolated from neonatal foreskin tissue as previously described31. Isolated keratinocytes were grown in EpiLife Complete media (Cascade Biologics, Portland, OR) supplemented with human keratinocyte growth supplement and 1000 U of penicillin-streptomycin (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN). Lowe patient keratinocytes were cultured under the same conditions.
Mutation Detection
Patient keratinocyte samples were extracted for RNA and genomic DNA isolation. Total RNA was extracted using the RNAeasy kit. Purified RNA was quantitated with the NanoDrop 2000. Reverse transcription of 2 µg total RNA was performed using SuperScript cDNA synthesis kit with random hexamers. Genomic DNA was isolated and purified using Genomic DNA mini kit. The resulting cDNA and 24 coding exons were amplified and directly sequenced using an ABI 377 DNA sequencer. Mutation assignment was based on the cDNA sequence GenBank NM_000276.3.
Immunoblot analysis
Keratinocytes lysates were subjected to 4X loading buffer. 40 µg protein were run on 10% gel and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. Membranes were blocked in 5% non-fat dried milk in PBS. Anti-OCRL and anti-beta-Actin antibodies were used to determine OCRL expression level changes in patient keratinocytes compared to control. IRDye anti-mouse and anti-rabbit (680 and 800) were diluted in concentrations described. An Odyssey Imaging system was used to analyze immunoblots.
Immunohistochemistry and Immunofluorescence
Enucleated eye sections were stained with Hematoxylin, dehydrated, cleared, and permanently mounted for image acquisition on Nikon ECLIPSE 50i microscope. Immunofluorescence was performed as previously described31. Snapshots of histology were taken using a Nikon ECLIPSE 50i microscope equipped with a 20x (numerical aperture 0.4) objective. Images were generated using an attached Rolera Bolt CMOS camera and QCapture Pro 7 software.
Structure Modeling
UCSF Chimera was used to visualize and construct OCRL protein structures and mutation sites32. The PDB accession numbers used were 4CMN (amino acids 215–560), 2QV2 (amino acids 564–901), and 3QBT (amino acids 540–678)33–35.
Results
Clinical Presentation and Histopathologic analysis
Patient 1 (Lowe 1), who has a known history of affected family members (Fig. 1A), presented at 14 days of age with no fix/follow, elevated intraocular pressure (IOP; right eye 31 mmHg, left eye 29 mmHg), corneal edema with Haab striae, and dense bilateral cataracts (Table 1). Corneal diameters were 12 mm and 11.5 mm in the right and left eyes, respectively. Lowe 1 additionally presented with proximal renal tubular acidosis, proteinuria, Dandy Walker Syndrome, congenital muscular dystrophy, developmental delays, low phosphatidylinositol bisphosphate phosphatase (0.3 mmol/min/mg protein [normal range: 2–9]) and keratinocytes with cell growth defects. The patient had multiple eye procedures, including trabeculotomy and lensectomy in both eyes. The left eye required additional surgery – including Ahmed tube shunt implantation, EDTA chelation of calcific band keratopathy, and placement of a Gundersen conjunctival flap – for IOP control and corneal decompensation. Optic nerve photos obtained by pediatric retinal digital camera (RetCam2) showed increased optic nerve cupping with shunt vessel form in the left eye (Fig. 1B). At last follow-up, only the right eye could fix and follow.
Table 1.
Patient 1 | Patient 2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Right Eye | Left Eye | Right Eye | Left Eye | |
Visual Acuity at Presentation | Unable | Unable | Blinks to light | Blinks to light |
Visual Acuity at Last Visit | Fix/Follow | No Fix/Follow | Fix/Follow | No Fix/Follow |
Presenting Intraocular Pressure | 31 mmHg | 29 mmHg | 41 mmHg | 44 mmHg |
Corneal Diameter (mm) | 12 | 11.5 | 10.5 | 10.5 |
Ocular Findings | Corneal edema with Haab striae | Central nuclear cataract both | ||
Dense cataract | Corneal edema | |||
Systemic Findings | Proximal renal tubular acidosis | Low-set ears | ||
Proteinuria | ||||
Dandy Walker | ||||
Congenital muscular dystrophy | ||||
Developmental delay |
Patient 2 (Lowe 2) presented at 2 months of age, with no known affected diagnosis of Lowe syndrome (Fig. 1C). Family history was significant for multiple lenticular flecks in both eyes of his mother and a maternal uncle with congenital cataracts, developmental delay, renal failure, and scoliosis. Vision was wince to light in both eyes but no fix or follow. The patient had elevated IOP (right eye 41 mmHg, left eye 44 mmHg), central nuclear cataracts in both eyes, and corneal edema. Corneal diameter was 10.5 mm in both eyes (Table 1). The patient was also noted to have low-set ears. The patient underwent cataract extraction in both eyes, anterior vitrectomy and pupilloplasty in the right eye, and endocyclophotocoagulation and trabeculotomy in the left eye. After trabeculotomy, the left eye developed a large hyphema and retinal detachment which required anterior chamber washout and penetrating keratoplasty. The left eye subsequently underwent placement of an Ahmed glaucoma drainage device; however due to progressive decreasing vision to no light perception and pain, the eye was enucleated for pain relief.
On histopathology of the enucleated eye, the cornea is completely opacified with extensive fibrovascular proliferation, loss of endothelial cells, and peripheral stromal neovascularization, indicating corneal ischemia (Fig. 2A). The angle of the anterior chamber is covered with dense fibrous tissue with peripheral anterior synchiae. The iris stroma is atrophic with extensive ectropion uvea (Fig. 2B,C). Ciliary body is atrophic with peripheral staphyloma under the area of Ahmed glaucoma drainage implant. Optic nerve shows atrophy and loss of axons and cupping of optic nerve head (Fig. 2D). Upon immunofluorescence staining with OCRL specific antibodies and anti-Arl13b (a small GTPase) antibodies, a marked decrease in OCRL signal was noted in the trabecular meshwork of the Lowe syndrome patient tissue, as compared to the normal human cadaveric control eye (Fig. 3).
Mutations Analysis in Lowe patients
DNA sequencing of gene OCRL1 revealed a novel deletion mutation in Lowe 1 (c.739-742delAAAG, p.Lys192Lys fsX)(Fig. 4). This 4-basepair deletion site localized in exon 8, which caused a shift of reading frame after Lys at #192 amino acid in the region between PH and 5-phosphatase domain. This deletion mutation resulted in a translational size change for OCRL protein from 901 to 200 amino acids.
We also identified another novel deletion mutation in Lowe 2 patient (c. 1595-1631del, p. Tyr477Leu fsX) (Fig. 4B). This 37-basepair mutation site localized at the tail of exon 14, which caused another reading frameshift at amino acid 477 in the 5-phosphatase domain, resulted in a truncated protein of 506 amino acids.
OCRL Protein Analysis for Lowe patients
OCRL is a multi-domain protein comprising an N-terminal pleckstrin homology (PH) domain followed by a central inositol-5-phosphatase domain, an ASPM-SPD-2-Hydin (ASH) domain, and a C-terminal, catalytically inactive RhoGAP-like domain. To test OCRL protein function in the patients’ cells, we extracted Lowe patient and normal control keratinocytes and performed immunoblot analysis. The amount of OCRL was estimated in total cell extracts using the total amount of protein for normalization. As shown in Fig. 4D, Lowe 1 patient with 4-basepair deletion mutation in the OCRL1 gene had a markedly reduced content of OCRL when compared to control. Thus the mutation in OCRL in Lowe patient 1 resulted in unstable protein and decreased wildtype expression.
Genotype-phenotype analysis for glaucoma in Lowe syndrome patients
To date, 30 OCRL1 mutations have been identified in Lowe Syndrome patients with congenital glaucoma, including the two patients identified in this paper (Table 2). These 30 mutations exhibit a variety of changes that include not only missense and nonsense, but also insertion, deletion, and gross inversion mutations which cause shifts of reading frame and result in truncated proteins. Half of these (16 mutations) occur in exons from 9 to 16, which encode the 5-phosphatase domain of OCRL protein, with most of them (11 mutations) are single base pair missense change. One third of identified (10 mutations) occur in exons from 18 to 23, which encode RhoGAP-like domain in C terminal, and most of these mutations cause truncated OCRL protein. Only two mutations occur in exons 16 and 17 coding ASH domain, and two deletion mutations occur in the 8th exon coding the linkage domain between PH and 5-phosphatase domains (Fig. 5).
Table 2.
Patient Number | Mutation Type | Exon | Nucleotide Change | Protein Change | Literature |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Deletion | 8 | c.739-742delAAAG c.741-744delAGAA | p.Lys192Lys fsX | Lowe I |
2 | Deletion | 14 | c.1595-1631del37 | p.Tyr477Leu fsX | Lowe II |
3 | Missense | 15 | c.1661A > C GAC > GCC | p.Asp499Ala | Luo 2014 |
4 | Missense | 15 | c.1736A > G CAC»CGC | p.His524Arg | Draaken 2011 |
5 | Deletion | 8 | c.797delT GTA»GAC | p.Val211Asp fsX | Hichri 2010 |
6 | Missense | 9 | c.890 T > C TTT»TCT | p.Phe242Ser | ” |
7 | Missense | 12 | c.1280 T > G GTC > GGC | p.Val372Gly | ” |
8 | Missense | 12 | c.1406 A > G CAT > CGT | p.His414Arg | ” |
9 | Missense | 13 | c.1516 G > A GAC > AAC | p.Asp451Asn | ” |
10 | Nonsense | 14 | c.1543 A > T AAA > TAA | p.Lys460X | ” |
11 | Deletion | 14 | c.1560-1561delCT GACTTC > GATC | p.Asp465Asp fsX | ” |
12 | Missense | 15 | c.1672T > C TGG > CGG | p.Trp503Arg | ” |
13 | Insertion | 16 | c.1846-1847insGACT TTC > TGACTTC | p.Phe561X | ” |
14 | Insertion | 16 | c.1857-1858insCCTT TCCTTA > TCCCCTTTTA | p.Leu565Pro fsX | ” |
15 | Missense | 17 | c.1938C > A AAC > AAA | p.Asn591Lys | ” |
16 | Insertion | 19 | c.2359-2360insC CTT > CCT | p.Leu732P fsX | ” |
17 | Deletion | 19 | c.2389-2391delGTA | p.Val742del | ” |
18 | Nonsense | 21 | c.2629 C > T CGA > TGA | p.Arg822X | ” |
19 | Missense | 22 | c.2746 + 1 G > C | Splicing defect | ” |
20 | Deletion | 23 | c.2802-2806delGACTC CAGACTCCA > CACA | p.Gln879-Thr880 > His fsX | ” |
21 | Missense | 10 | c.995 A > G CAA > CGA | p.Gln277Arg | Sethi 2008 |
22 | Deletion | 21 | c.2525-2526delTG GTGGCT > GGCT | p.Val787Gly fsX | ” |
23 | Missense | 21 | c.2567-2568 A > G | Splicing defect | ” |
24 | Deletion | 19 | c.2333-2340del8 TGGATGAA TTGGATGAAGG > TGG | p.Leu723Trp fsX | Kim 2014 |
25 | Missense | 14 | c.1619G > A CGG > CAG | p.Arg485Gln | ” |
26 | Nonsense | 21 | c.2593 C > T CGA > TGA | p.Arg810X | ” |
27 | Inversion | 21 | c. 2408-5164 inv | Gross inversion | ” |
28 | Nonsense | 12 | c.1327 C > T CAA > TAA | p.Gln388X | Kubota 1998 |
29 | Missense | 15 | c.1731C > G AGC > AGG | p.Ser522Arg | ” |
30 | Missense | 10 | c.992 T > C TTC > TCC | p.Phe276Ser | Chabaâ 2006 |
Three-dimensional structural analysis of the OCRL shows that only 4 out of the 16 mutations in the 5-phosphatase domain are in or near the active site, while only 2 of the amino acid mutation sites directly localize to the active site (Fig. 6). This suggest while the loss of 5-phosphatase activity alone not required for the glaucoma phenotype.
Discussion
While ocular phenotype of Lowe syndrome has been recognized since the initial description of the disease1, little is known of the ocular pathophysiology of cataract, glaucoma, and corneal keloid formation. We here report the identification of two novel mutations of OCRL1 in affected Lowe syndrome patients, present the corresponding histopathologic analysis of an enucleated eye, and perform a genotype-phenotype analysis of mutations resulting in congenital glaucoma in Lowe syndrome.
We identified two new deletion mutations, c.739-742delAAAG and c. 1595-1631del, in the OCRL1 gene in two unrelated patients with Lowe Syndrome. Patient 1’s deletion occurs in exon 8, just preceding the 5-phosphatase domain, which results in unstable transcribed protein and the loss of OCRL activity as demonstrated by PI(4,5)P2 activity. Patient 2’s deletion occurs within exon 14, directly affecting the 5-phosphatase domain, which would lead to incomplete transcription of the ASPM-SPD-2-Hydin (ASH) domain, and the C-terminal, catalytically inactive RhoGAP-like domain. Lowe 1 had a four base pair deletion mutation in the region between the PH and 5-phosphatase domains, causing the OCRL protein to shorten from 901 amino acids to 200 amino acids and lose its inositol 5-phosphatase domain. This frameshift mutation also caused Lowe 1 to have significantly reduced levels of OCRL in his keratinocytes as compared to controls. The deletion mutation in Lowe 2 occurred in the 5-phosphatase domain and caused a frameshift that shortened the OCRL protein to 506 amino acids. Both patients presented with bilateral congenital cataracts and elevated intraocular pressure that required a number of glaucoma surgeries.
It is recognized that the majority of OCRL1 mutations that cause Lowe syndrome are deletion and early truncation mutations, and a smaller number of mutations are missense mutations that may shed more light on the functional importance of each of the domains36. Most of the currently reported mutations for Lowe syndrome (eye, brain, and kidney) are located within the 5-phosphatase domain and the RhoGAP-like domain, whereas the mutations associated with Dent’s disease (kidney alone) are more in the N-terminal domain preceding the catalytic and C-terminal lipid binding domains36. Based on our analysis of the glaucoma associated mutations, the majority of missense mutations occur within the 5-phosphatase domain, and only 30% are found within the RhoGAP-like domain, suggesting that the enzymatic functions of 5-phosphatase are important in causing the glaucoma phenotype. However, on further structural analysis based on the location of mutated amino acids, only 4 out of 16 missense mutations were in the active site or near the core of the catalytic domain of 5-phosphatase. Further, the symptoms of the patients were not more severe than that of mutations occurring outside of the 5-phosphatase domain. This raises an important question that has been noted by several groups, namely, how important is the 5-phosphatase function in the cause of Lowe syndrome, if PI(4,5)P2 levels are high also in the Dent’s disease patient derived fibroblasts.
One of the two patients we report here does not manifest any renal phenotype. In fact, the most severe organ system involved is the eye, with advanced glaucoma leading to complete blindness and requiring removal of the eye. The pathology studies support the findings of previous Lowe syndrome eyes at autopsy, namely the corneal keloid formation, iris anomalies of ectropion uvea, ciliary body cysts, and retinal gliosis near the optic nerve37–40. The advances in cataract surgery have led to the successful removal of the lens, which in previous reports have found retained nuclei, thickened lens capsule, formation of excrescences under the lens epithelial cells37, 41, 42. This deletion mutation presented with severe ocular disease but no significant renal pathology, raising the possibility of disease-modifying genes that could be expressed in the kidney and ameliorate the loss of OCRL.
In conclusion, we here report two novel mutations in OCRL1 with severe ocular phenotypes of congenital glaucoma, with one patient requiring enucleation. Analysis of the mutations that are associated with glaucoma in Lowe syndrome showed predominant distribution of mutations within the 5-phosphatase and the RhoGAP-like domain.
Acknowledgements
We thank Drs. Timothy Corson, Michael Boulton, and John Spence for thoughtful comments during the preparation of this manuscript. This work was supported by National Institute of Health/National Eye Institute [K08-EY022058 to Y.S., R01-EY025295 to Y.S.]; Veterans Administration Merit award [CX001298 to Y.S.]; Ziegler Foundation for the Blind [to Y.S.]; Showalter Foundation [to Y.S.]; Research for Prevention of Blindness Unrestricted grant [to Glick Eye Institute]; American Glaucoma Society [Clinician Scientist Award to Y.S.]; Lowe syndrome association [to Y.S.]; and Knights Templar Eye Foundation [to Y.S.].
Author Contributions
Y.S. and E.S. designed the experiments and participated in all aspects of the project. E.S., Y.S, N.L., J.A.A., M.L., C.W., D.N., D.S., and A.G. worked on writing the paper and reviewing the manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Loi M. Lowe syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2006;1:16. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-1-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lewis, R. A., Nussbaum, R. L. & Brewer, E. D. In GeneReviews(R) (eds R. A., Pagon et al.) (University of Washington, Seattle, 1993). [PubMed]
- 3.Ramirez IB, et al. Impaired neural development in a zebrafish model for Lowe syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21:1744–1759. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Recker F, et al. Characterization of 28 novel patients expands the mutational and phenotypic spectrum of Lowe syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol. 2015;30:931–943. doi: 10.1007/s00467-014-3013-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bockenhauer D, et al. Renal phenotype in Lowe Syndrome: a selective proximal tubular dysfunction. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3:1430–1436. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00520108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tricot L, et al. End-stage renal failure in Lowe syndrome. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2003;18:1923–1925. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfg294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.McCrea HJ, et al. All known patient mutations in the ASH-RhoGAP domains of OCRL affect targeting and APPL1 binding. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;369:493–499. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.02.067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yuksel A, Karaca E, Albayram MS. Magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and facial dysmorphism in a case of Lowe syndrome with novel OCRL1 gene mutation. J Child Neurol. 2009;24:93–96. doi: 10.1177/0883073808321047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Monnier N, Satre V, Lerouge E, Berthoin F, Lunardi J. OCRL1 mutation analysis in French Lowe syndrome patients: implications for molecular diagnosis strategy and genetic counseling. Human mutation. 2000;16:157–165. doi: 10.1002/1098-1004(200008)16:2<157::AID-HUMU8>3.0.CO;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lozanovski VJ, Ristoska-Bojkovska N, Korneti P, Gucev Z, Tasic V. OCRL1 mutation in a boy with Dent disease, mild mental retardation, but without cataracts. World J Pediatr. 2011;7:280–283. doi: 10.1007/s12519-011-0312-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Liu T, Yue Z, Wang H, Tong H, Sun L. Novel mutation of OCRL1 in Lowe syndrome. Indian J Pediatr. 2015;82:89–92. doi: 10.1007/s12098-014-1581-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Schramm L, et al. Advanced renal insufficiency in a 34-year-old man with Lowe syndrome. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004;43:538–543. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2003.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Leahey AM, Charnas LR, Nussbaum RL. Nonsense mutations in the OCRL-1 gene in patients with the oculocerebrorenal syndrome of Lowe. Hum Mol Genet. 1993;2:461–463. doi: 10.1093/hmg/2.4.461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Suchy SF, Olivos-Glander IM, Nussabaum RL. Lowe syndrome, a deficiency of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate 5-phosphatase in the Golgi apparatus. Hum Mol Genet. 1995;4:2245–2250. doi: 10.1093/hmg/4.12.2245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nussbaum RL, Orrison BM, Janne PA, Charnas L, Chinault AC. Physical mapping and genomic structure of the Lowe syndrome gene OCRL1. Hum Genet. 1997;99:145–150. doi: 10.1007/s004390050329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sugimoto K, et al. A novel OCRL1 mutation in a patient with the mild phenotype of Lowe syndrome. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2014;232:163–166. doi: 10.1620/tjem.232.163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Conduit SE, Dyson JM, Mitchell CA. Inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatases; new players in the regulation of cilia and ciliopathies. FEBS Lett. 2012;586:2846–2857. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2012.07.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Olivos-Glander IM, Janne PA, Nussbaum RL. The oculocerebrorenal syndrome gene product is a 105-kD protein localized to the Golgi complex. Am J Hum Genet. 1995;57:817–823. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Satre V, et al. Characterization of a germline mosaicism in families with Lowe syndrome, and identification of seven novel mutations in the OCRL1 gene. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;65:68–76. doi: 10.1086/302443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mao Y, et al. A PH domain within OCRL bridges clathrin-mediated membrane trafficking to phosphoinositide metabolism. EMBO J. 2009;28:1831–1842. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2009.155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kubota T, et al. Identification of two novel mutations in the OCRL1 gene in Japanese families with Lowe syndrome. Clin Genet. 1998;54:199–202. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1998.tb04284.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Addis M, Loi M, Lepiani C, Cau M, Melis MA. OCRL mutation analysis in Italian patients with Lowe syndrome. Human mutation. 2004;23:524–525. doi: 10.1002/humu.9239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chabaa L, et al. [Oculo-cerebro-renal Lowe syndrome: clinical, biochemical and molecular studies in a Moroccan patient] Ann Biol Clin (Paris) 2006;64:53–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Draaken M, et al. Maternal de novo triple mosaicism for two single OCRL nucleotide substitutions (c.1736A > T, c.1736A > G) in a Lowe syndrome family. Hum Genet. 2011;129:513–519. doi: 10.1007/s00439-010-0944-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Pasternack SM, et al. A premature termination mutation in a patient with Lowe syndrome without congenital cataracts: dropping the “O” in OCRL. Klin Padiatr. 2013;225:29–33. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1321900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hichri H, et al. From Lowe syndrome to Dent disease: correlations between mutations of the OCRL1 gene and clinical and biochemical phenotypes. Human mutation. 2011;32:379–388. doi: 10.1002/humu.21391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sethi SK, et al. Mutations in OCRL1 gene in Indian children with Lowe syndrome. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2008;12:358–362. doi: 10.1007/s10157-008-0059-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Peverall J, Edkins E, Goldblatt J, Murch A. Identification of a novel deletion of the entire OCRL1 gene detected by FISH analysis in a family with Lowe syndrome. Clin Genet. 2000;58:479–482. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2000.580609.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Peces R, et al. A novel and de novo deletion in the OCRL1 gene associated with a severe form of Lowe syndrome. Int Urol Nephrol. 2013;45:1767–1771. doi: 10.1007/s11255-012-0246-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kim H-K, et al. Lowe syndrome: a single center’s experience in Korea. Korean Journal of Pediatrics. 2014;57:140–148. doi: 10.3345/kjp.2014.57.3.140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Luo N, et al. Primary cilia signaling mediates intraocular pressure sensation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2014;111:12871–12876. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1323292111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Pettersen EF, et al. UCSF Chimera–a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem. 2004;25:1605–1612. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tresaugues L, et al. Structural basis for phosphoinositide substrate recognition, catalysis, and membrane interactions in human inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatases. Structure. 2014;22:744–755. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2014.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Erdmann KS, et al. A role of the Lowe syndrome protein OCRL in early steps of the endocytic pathway. Dev Cell. 2007;13:377–390. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Pirruccello M, Swan LE, Folta-Stogniew E, De Camilli P. Recognition of the F&H motif by the Lowe syndrome protein OCRL. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2011;18:789–795. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Stenson PD, et al. Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD): 2003 update. Human mutation. 2003;21:577–581. doi: 10.1002/humu.10212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ginsberg J, Bove KE, Fogelson MH. Pathological features of the eye in the oculocerebrorenal (Lowe) syndrome. Journal of pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus. 1981;18:16–24. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-19810701-05. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Cibis GW, Tripathi RC, Tripathi BJ, Harris DJ. Corneal keloid in Lowe’s syndrome. Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill.: 1960) 1982;100:1795–1799. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1982.01030040775013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Tripathi RC, Cibis GW, Tripathi BJ. Lowe’s syndrome. Transactions of the ophthalmological societies of the United Kingdom. 1980;100:132–139. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Giangiacomo J. Ocular manifestations of hereditary renal disorders. Pediatric annals. 1977;6:126–129. doi: 10.3928/0090-4481-19770101-08. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lavin CW, McKeown CA. The oculocerebrorenal syndrome of Lowe. International ophthalmology clinics. 1993;33:179–191. doi: 10.1097/00004397-199303320-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Johnson BL, Hiles DA. Ocular pathology of Lowe’s syndrome in a female infant. Journal of pediatric ophthalmology. 1976;13:204–210. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]