Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2017 May 11;7:1736. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02048-w

Clinical experience with the artificial bone graft substitute Calcibon used following curettage of benign and low-grade malignant bone tumors

Joerg Friesenbichler 1,, Werner Maurer-Ertl 1, Marko Bergovec 1, Lukas A Holzer 1, Kathrin Ogris 1,2, Lukas Leitner 1, Andreas Leithner 1
PMCID: PMC5431777  PMID: 28496119

Abstract

Artificial bone graft substitutes, such as Calcibon, are becoming increasingly interesting as they do not cause donor site morbidity which is an advantage compared to autologous bone grafts. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and potential complications associated with the use of Calcibon. Twenty-seven patients with benign and low-grade malignant bone tumors were treated with curettage and refilling of the bony cavity. Based on the radiological classification system of Neer, these lesions only comprised Grade I lesions, describing cysts that only require curettage and filling, but no additional treatment. At a mean follow up of six months we observed radiological consolidation without resorption of the bone graft substitute. These observations were also made at a mean follow-up of 13 and 32 months, respectively. According to the classification system of Goslings and Gouma we observed six surgical complications. Summing up, Calcibon seems to be a reliable bone graft substitute with low complication rates. However, delayed resorption should be expected. Calcibon seems to be an alternative to autologous bone grafts or allografts in adequate indications.

Introduction

Benign bone tumors and low-grade malignancies are usually treated with intralesional resection or curettage. After curettage, the bone cavity can be left unfilled or it can be refilled with autologous or allogenic material1, 2. The final result should be a full bony ingrowth and a remodeling of the graft into mature bone.

A known side effect of autologous bone grafts originating from the iliac crest is donor side morbidity with risks like infection, delayed wound healing, neuro-vascular injuries, heterotopic ossification and local pain, which are the most commonly reported complication2, 3. As an alternative to autologous bone grafts, allogenic or artificial bone graft substitutes (ABGS), such as demineralized bone matrix, bone graft extenders, or bone morphogenic proteins, can be applied2, 48. However, allogenic materials have been reported to be immunogenicity and to transfer infectious diseases with complication rates for infection up to 12.2%9, 10. On the other hand, some bone void fillers in general have also been associated with higher complications rates up to 33%1, 2, 5, 8, 11.

Bone graft extenders like ceramics, salts, or synthetic products, such as polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), are often used to refill bone cavities as they provide the advantage that they are moldable and can be used to fill irregularly shaped defects. What is more, ABGS are freely available without any restrictions of access, there is no reason for disease transmission.

Calcibon (Biomet, Warsaw, IN) is a synthetic bone graft substitute with osteo-conductive properties. It belongs to the family of α-tricalcium-phosphates (α-TCP). Calcibon is a chemical composition of 62.5% α-TCP, 26.8% dicalcium phoshate dihydrate, 8.9% calcium carbonate and 1.8% precipitated hydroxyapatite. In order to liquefy this mixture, 1% disodium hydrogen phosphate dodecahydrate has to be added with an ideal liquid-to-powder ratio of 0.35 mL/g12. However, a microporosity with a pore size of less than 1 μm is only present in 30 to 40% of the resulting graft12. Following its application to the cavity and drying, Calcibon’s biomechanical properties become similar to hydroxyapatite13. Due to its ability of bio-degradation and osteoconductive features, Calcibon is eventually getting reabsorbed by osteoclasts resulting in the remodeling of this grafting material into new and healthy bone. This has also been shown for other injectable calcium phosphate cements1214. According to the manufacturer’s guidelines, the time until resorption of Calcibon depends on the area of application, as well as on the proximity to healthy and well-vascularized bone. Resorption of 22.9% of the cement volume used for kyphoplasty was observed by Maestretti et al.15 during a follow-up of more than 10 years.

The aim of this prospective, non-randomized study was to assess the efficacy of Calcibon regarding its resorption and remodeling into healthy bone following the curettage of bone tumors for a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Furthermore, complication rates were evaluated.

Results

The study group consisted of 20 female and 7 male patients. The patients’ mean age at operation was 44 years (range, 17 to 72). Ten lesions were located in the proximal or distal tibia or fibula, two in the proximal and five in the distal femur, respectively. Three bone tumors were located in the proximal humerus, one lesion in the pubic bone and six lesions in the fingers. The lesions comprised fifteen enchondromas, five low-grade chondrosarcomas (G1), three aneurysmatic bone cysts and four simple or juvenile bone cysts. According to the bone healing classification system of Neer, all lesions were graded as grade I, which indicates that curetted cysts require no further treatment. There were no grade II, III or IV lesions. However, in six cases an additional plate osteosynthesis was required for stabilization based on an intraoperative decision of the surgeon.

The mean amount of Calcibon used for refilling of the cavities was 23 ml (range, 10 to 60, Figs 1a and 2a). In the case of a low-grade chondrosarcoma located in the proximal tibia and the distal femur, and in another case of a juvenile bone cyst situated in the proximal humerus, we had to mix Calcibon with β-TCP Vitoss (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI) in order to refill the big resulting bony cavities.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(ac) X-ray of a 36 year-old male patient few days following curettage of a low-grade chondrosarcoma of the left proximal tibia. (b and c) Follow-up radiographs 7 and 13 months following index surgery showing integration but no resorption of the artificial bone graft substitute.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(ac) X-ray of a 64 year-old male patient few days following curettage of an enchondroma of the right distal femur. To enhance primary stability, a plate osteosynthesis was done. (b and c) Follow-up x-rays 5 and 11 months following index surgery showing integration but no resorption of the bone graft substitute.

The average postoperative follow-up for all patients was 26 months (range, 1 to 50). One patient was lost of follow-up one month after surgery.

At a mean follow up of six months (range, 1 to 9) we observed radiological consolidation following curettage in 23 patients. However, the ABGS Calcibon had not been resorbed by that time (Figs 1b and 2b). These observations were in line with our results obtained at 13 (range, 10 to 16, n = 19) and 32 (range, 18 to 50, n = 19) months of clinical and radiological follow-up (Figs 1c and 2c).

We observed no local recurrences during the follow-up periods indicated.

Complications

One patient developed idiopathic postoperative femoral nerve palsy following curettage of an enchondroma located in the distal femur. Thorough clinical examinations, which included MRIs of the brain and the lumbar spine, as well as examinations of peripheral nerve conduction velocities, did not yield pathological results and thus were not able to sufficiently explain the reason for this palsy.

Another patient suffered a traumatic fracture of the distal femur after falling over one month after primary surgery. This fracture required revision of the plate osteosynthesis which had been used for stabilization after curettage. Furthermore, one patient presented with delayed wound healing of the proximal fibula. Though aseptic, this complication required revision and a removal of the bone graft substitute two months after initial surgery.

In two other cases the removal of osteosynthesis plates of the proximal and the distal femur was indicated due to persistent pain nine and thirteen months following stabilization. In another patient we observed an extravasation of Calcibon in postoperative x-rays following surgery of the proximal fibula. This was of no further consequence as the patient was free of symptoms.

When being classified according to the classification system of Goslings and Gouma16 the complications described above can be summarized as follows: one patient suffered a grade 0 (no harm), another one a grade I complication, the latter referring to meaning a temporary disadvantage which does not require surgery. Four patients presented with grade II complications showing total recovery after revision. No patients suffered grade III, IV, or V complications.

Discussion

The current study demonstrates that the ABGS Calcibon shows rapid bone consolidation, incorporation and durability, combined with a low complication rate. Further advantages of Calcibon lie in the possibility of a minimal invasive, percutaneous, transcortical administration like in case of vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. This technique might also be used for be benign cystic bone lesions. The resilience of Calcibon, which is similar to hydroxyapatite and develops shortly after application and drying, theoretically allows an unrestricted postoperative mobilization, though restrictions may apply in individual cases. Overall, it can be concluded that ABGS Calcibon seems to provide a safe and effective long-term treatment option/reconstruction tool following the curettage of benign and low-grade malignant bone tumors. Its capability of resorption forms another advantage which suggests that Calcibon should be preferred as compared to PMMA, although resorption might take more than a decade which has been shown in the study of Maestretti et al.15.

One reason for delayed resorption might be the development of a membrane between bone and the ABGS but in order to prove this theory, tissue samples have to be taken what could be in the focus of further studies. Nevertheless, increasing knowledge about time till resorption could be beneficial in counseling patients and in advancing or restricting activities.

Complications directly associated with the ABGS Calcibon could not be observed in the current series. All revisions conducted were due to delayed wound healing or mechanical complications.

Depending on a surgeon’s preference, there are different approaches regarding the reconstruction of bony cavities following curettage. Refilling the curetted bone is known to enhance primary stability and acceleration of bone healing, whereas similar clinical results have been reported for unfilled defects2, 5, 8, 11, 17.

Complications and shortcomings associated with the usage of autologous and allogenic bone grafts have stimulated interests in potential alternatives, such as ABGS2, 18, 19. The use of TCP and fluid cements has yielded good and excellent results in spinal surgery which was performed for fracture stabilization, such as vertebro- or kyphoplasty15, 2022.

On the other hand, high complications rates of up to 33% have been reported for various bone graft extenders1, 2, 5, 8, 11. Pain, aseptic inflammation and formation of reactive soft tissue-cysts are amongst the most commonly reported complications1, 7, 23. Extravasated liquid or semi-liquid bone graft extenders have been discussed as most likely causes of these.

Recently, Kaczmarczyk et al.24 reported a minimally invasive treatment of cystic bone tumors with a bi-phasic, injectable ceramic bone substitute (CERAMENT, BoneSupport, Sweden) which yielded good results after one year of follow-up showing a nearly total osseous consolidation. Similar observations were made in the current series. Even though osseous consolidation was observed soon after surgery, the bone graft substitute Calcibon was not fully resorbed until the end of our follow-up period, which indicates a delayed resorption profile of this substance. Nevertheless, we did not observe any serious complications associated with this material.

Van Hoff et al.2 related a retrospective study assessing the clinical outcome of surgical management of benign bone tumours treated with ultraporous β-TCP morsels. At 6 months of follow-up 50% of the ABGS had progressed to trabeculation. One advantage of this study was the rapid resorption of the β-TCP morsels with low complication rates. On the other hand, filling irregularly shaped defects by using morsels is aggravated and compared to pastes the bone window has to be bigger with reduction of the stability of the effected bone.

One limitation of the study is the short mean follow-up period of 26 months, which was not sufficient to document a full resorption of the ABGS Calcibon. In order to illustrate this material’s resorption profile a longer follow-up period is required. Nevertheless, it could be shown, that there was a low complication rate by using this bone void filler. In line with our findings, Van Lieshout et al.13 and Maestretti et al.15 related resorption of Calcibon to require more than 10 years after spinal surgery.

Like in other series reporting the experiences and the clinical results of bone graft extenders, statistical analysis is lacking, which is another limitation. Furthermore, the study population was too small and too heterogeneous, therefore, the data could not be analyzed sufficiently.

In conclusion, this is the first series reporting Calcibon as bone void filler following curettage of benign and low grade malignant bone tumors. This ABGS seems to be a reliable solution for defect management with low complication rates. However, it seems to require a longer period of time until resorption which has also been shown in case of spinal surgery previously. In summary, we think that Calcibon can be recommended as an alternative to autologous bone grafts or allografts in suitable indications.

Methods

Between June 2013 and February 2015, we treated 27 patients with benign and low-grade malignant bone tumours with curettage and refilling of the bony cavities using the artificial bone graft substitute Calcibon. Patients with high-grade malignancies were excluded. Clinical follow-ups and two-planar x-rays were performed 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and one year after surgery. All operations were performed by experienced orthopaedic tumor surgeons (AL, WME, MB).

After surgical exposure of the affected bone, an osseous window was created through which the lesion could be accessed. Curettage was performed under radiographic control using a c-arm. The curetted tissue was sent for histopathologic examination. Calcibon was prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions, injected into the void and allowed to dry for several minutes. If possible the osseous lid was re-apposed and the layers of the wound were closed.

Time required for osseous consolidation, local recurrence rates, and complications were evaluated. Complications were evaluated according to the classification system of Goslings and Gouma16 as follows: 0 (no harm), 1 (temporary disadvantage, no reoperation), 2 (recovery after reoperation), 3 (permanent damage/disability), 4 (death), and 5 (unclear as a result of untimely death).

Osseous consolidation was classified according to the modified Neer score24, 25.

Ethical approval and informed consent

The study was a nonregistered single-center investigation and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Graz (EK 29-015 ex 16/17). All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Author Contributions

J.F. and L.A.H. wrote the manuscript text, J.F., W.M.E., M.B. and L.L. collected the data, K.O. and A.L. prepared the figures, all authors were involved in the outpatient care. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Friesenbichler J, et al. Adverse reactions of artificial bone graft substitutes: lessons learned from using tricalcium phosphate geneX(R) Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:976–982. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3305-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Van Hoff C, et al. Effectiveness of ultraporous beta-tricalcium phosphate (vitoss) as bone graft substitute for cavitary defects in benign and low-grade malignant bone tumors. Am J Orthop. 2012;41:20–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kurz LT, Garfin SR, Booth RE., Jr. Harvesting autogenous iliac bone grafts. A review of complications and techniques. Spine. 1989;14:1324–1331. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198912000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Evaniew N, et al. Use of a calcium sulfate-calcium phosphate synthetic bone graft composite in the surgical management of primary bone tumors. Orthopedics. 2013;36:216–222. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20130122-25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kelly CM, Wilkins RM. Treatment of benign bone lesions with an injectable calcium sulfate-based bone graft substitute. Orthopedics. 2004;27:131–135. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-20040102-11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Liu B, Lun DX. Current Application of beta-tricalcium Phosphate Composites in Orthopaedics. Orthop Surg. 2012;4:139–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1757-7861.2012.00189.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Saadoun, S., Macdonald, C., Bell, B. A. & Papadopoulos, M. C. Dangers of bone graft substitutes: lessons from using GeneX. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 82, 3, doi:jnnp.2010.232371 [pii] 10.1136/jnnp.2010.232371 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 8.Younger EM, Chapman MW. Morbidity at bone graft donor sites. Journal of orthopaedic trauma. 1989;3:192–195. doi: 10.1097/00005131-198909000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tomford WW, Starkweather RJ, Goldman MH. A study of the clinical incidence of infection in the use of banked allograft bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63:244–248. doi: 10.2106/00004623-198163020-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sutherland AG, Raafat A, Yates P, Hutchison JD. Infection associated with the use of allograft bone from the north east Scotland Bone Bank. J Hosp Infect. 1997;35:215–222. doi: 10.1016/S0195-6701(97)90209-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Johnson LJ, Clayer M. Aqueous calcium sulphate as bone graft for voids following open curettage of bone tumours. ANZ journal of surgery. 2013;83:564–570. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06175.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Link DP, van den Dolder J, Wolke JG, Jansen JA. The cytocompatibility and early osteogenic characteristics of an injectable calcium phosphate cement. Tissue Eng. 2007;13:493–500. doi: 10.1089/ten.2006.0015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Van Lieshout EM, Van Kralingen GH, El-Massoudi Y, Weinans H, Patka P. Microstructure and biomechanical characteristics of bone substitutes for trauma and orthopaedic surgery. BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2011;12:34. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ooms EM, Wolke JG, van der Waerden JP, Jansen JA. Trabecular bone response to injectable calcium phosphate (Ca-P) cement. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;61:9–18. doi: 10.1002/jbm.10029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Maestretti G, et al. A prospective study of percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty with calcium phosphate cement in traumatic vertebral fractures: 10-year results. Eur Spine J. 2014;23:1354–1360. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3206-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Goslings JC, Gouma DJ. What is a surgical complication? World J Surg. 2008;32:952–952. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9563-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Prosser, G. H., Baloch, K. G., Tillman, R. M., Carter, S. R. & Grimer, R. J. Does curettage without adjuvant therapy provide low recurrence rates in giant-cell tumors of bone? Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 211–218 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 18.Nicholas, R. W. & Lange, T. A. Granular tricalcium phosphate grafting of cavitary lesions in human bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 197–203 (1994). [PubMed]
  • 19.Yang HL, et al. Bone healing response to a synthetic calcium sulfate/beta-tricalcium phosphate graft material in a sheep vertebral body defect model. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2012;100:1911–1921. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.32758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hillmeier J, et al. [The evaluation of balloonkyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures. An interdisciplinary concept] Orthopade. 2004;33:893–904. doi: 10.1007/s00132-004-0669-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hillmeier J, et al. [Balloon kyphoplasty of vertebral compression fractures with a new calcium phosphate cement] Orthopade. 2004;33:31–39. doi: 10.1007/s00132-003-0578-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kasperk C, et al. Treatment of painful vertebral fractures by kyphoplasty in patients with primary osteoporosis: a prospective nonrandomized controlled study. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20:604–612. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.041203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Welkerling H, Raith J, Kastner N, Marschall C, Windhager R. Painful soft-tissue reaction to injectable Norian SRS calcium phosphate cement after curettage of enchondromas. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:238–239. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.85B2.13255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kaczmarczyk J, Sowinski P, Goch M, Katulska K. Complete twelve month bone remodeling with a bi-phasic injectable bone substitute in benign bone tumors: a prospective pilot study. BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2015;16:369. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0828-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cho HS, et al. Minimal invasive surgery for unicameral bone cyst using demineralized bone matrix: a case series. BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2012;13:134. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES