Abstract
Porous monoliths of MoO3 nanoplates were synthesized from ammonium molybdate (AHM) by freeze-casting and subsequent thermal treatment from 300 to 600 °C. Pure orthorhombic MoO3 phase was obtained at thermal treatment temperature of 400 °C and above. MoO3 monoliths thermally treated at 400 °C displayed bimodal pore structure, including large pore channels replicating the ice crystals and small pores from MoO3 sheets stacking. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images revealed that the average thicknesses of MoO3 sheet were 50 and 300 nm in porous monoliths thermally treated at 400 °C. The photocatalytic performance of MoO3 was evaluated through degradation of methylene blue (MB) under visible light radiation and MoO3 synthesized at 400 °C exhibited strong adsorption performance and best photocatalytic activity for photodegradation of MB of 99.7% under visible illumination for 60 min. MoO3 photocatalyst displayed promising cyclic performance, and the decolorization efficiency of MB solution was 98.1% after four cycles.
Introduction
Transition metal oxide semiconductors (TMOs)1, 2 are viable materials due their electronic band structures, physical properties and stability in demanding chemical environments, and therefore have been used in different applications such as gas sensors, resonators and high-efficiency catalysts3–6. TMOs, such as TiO2, WO3, MoO3 and CeO2, are photocatalysts7–9 and decompose organic pollutant, such as phenol10, methyl orange11, rhodamine B12 and methylene13 MoO3 is a n-type semiconductor and exists in three main crystal structures: orthorhombic (α-MoO3), monoclinic (β-MoO3) and hexagonal (h-MoO3)14–16. Particularly, α-MoO3 has been considered as a potential photocatalyst material in terms of its anisotropic layered structure17, where highly asymmetrical [MoO6] octahedrons assemble into a bilayer in such a manner that certain octahedrons share four corners to form a plane, further combining with another plane by sharing octahedral edges along the [001] direction and all the bilayers stack up along the [010] direction with weak van der Waals forces18–20. Compared with the bulk counterpart, significantly large surface area and high aspect ratio could be expected in the 1D nanostructure21.
Numerous methods have been developed to synthesize MoO3, such as magnetron sputtering22, chemical precipitation23, hydrothermal synthesis24, electrocatalytic oxidation25, 26 and physical vapor deposition27. Sara Alizadeh et al.28 synthesized MoO3 through a facile salt method using NH4NO3 as a molten salt. X. S. Yuan et al.29 synthesized MoO3 · 0.5H2O via a room-temperature aqueous chemical method. Zhang et al.30 synthesized 2D MoO3 nanosheets by liquid exfoliation method. Though various morphologies of MoO3 have been synthesized, the synthesis processes were complex and not in environmental protection. In recent years, freeze-drying has been explored as a unique route to produce novel porous materials. Freeze-drying using water offers advantages such as water is an environment-friendly solvent and the use of ice crystals as porogens is green and sustainable. Moreover, the growth speed and orientation of the ice crystals can be controlled to obtain unidirectional porous scaffolds. More importantly, by changing variables during freezing, it is possible to produce materials with a variety of pore morphologies and nanostructures31.
In this study, hierarchically porous monoliths of α-MoO3 nanoplates of high purity were synthesized through the combination of the freeze-drying and thermal treatment, and the phase composition and microstructure were investigated. The photocatalytic activity of the monoliths was evaluated through the degradation of MB under visible radiation. The results showed that the as-synthesized MoO3 exhibited high-efficiency catalytic as well as adsorption performance, and the decomposition efficiency of 30 mg/L MB was 98.8% under illumination for 30 min, which was far superior to the decomposition efficiencies reported in literature.
Results and Discussion
Phase analysis and morphology observation
X-ray diffraction patterns (XRD) of porous ammonium molybdate (AHM) after thermal treatment between 300 and 600 °C in Fig. 1 shows the formation of α-MoO3. Porous AHM, thermally treated at 300 °C shows the presence of h-MoO3 diffraction peaks at the 2θ of 9.69°, 19.45° and 29.355° in addition to diffraction peaks of α-MoO3. Porous AHM thermally treated at 400 °C shows that all the diffraction peaks of the synthesized products correspond to only α-MoO3. On increase in thermal treatment temperature of porous AHM to 500 and 600 °C, the intensities of (020), (040) and (060) diffraction peaks increased (Fig. 1). It suggests that the α-MoO3 crystals grow preferentially along (0k0) direction with increase of thermal treatment temperature. The average crystallite sizes of α-MoO3 obtained at different thermal treatment temperature are estimated by using Scherrer’s equation (L = 0.89λ/β cos θ)32 and are shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
Thermal treatment temperature (°C) | 300 | 400 | 500 | 600 |
Average crystallite thickness (nm) | 27.8 | 45.4 | >100 | >100 |
Figure 2 shows the morphology of as-synthesized α-MoO3 treated at different temperatures. MoO3 synthesized at 300 °C is composed of foam-like cellular structure (Fig. 2a). At low thermal treatment temperature, the α-MoO3 crystals show lower crystallinity and do not show rod-like or sheet-like morphology typical of α-MoO3 33. On increase of thermal treatment temperature to 400 °C, bimodal pore structure is visible (Fig. 2b) including large porous channels replicating from ice sublimation and small pores originating from stacking of α-MoO3 nanosheets. As shown in Fig. 2c, when the thermal treatment temperature is further raised to 500 °C, α-MoO3 sheets show typical crystalline morphology with the average sheet thickness of 300 nm. However, when the thermal treatment temperature increased to 600 °C, α-MoO3 morphology changed greatly (Fig. 2d). It can be clearly seen that α-MoO3 powder present a belt-like structure with an average thickness of 2 μm and a length of about 25 μm. This morphology evolved because of the growth of α-MoO3 crystal along both a axis and b axis. SEM results confirm that the synthesis temperature has a significant impact on the morphologies of α-MoO3. Figure 3 shows the energy dispersive spectrum (EDS) and elemental mapping of porous MoO3 synthesized at 400 °C and demonstrate the homogeneous distribution of Mo and O elements.
Transmission electron micrographs (TEM) of the MoO3 single crystals in Fig. 4 show that α-MoO3 nanoplates synthesized at 300 °C have irregular morphology with an average diameter of 200 nm and thickness between 20 and 40 nm. Similarly, α-MoO3 synthesized at 400 °C (Fig. 4b) exhibited plate thickness of about 50 nm. When the temperature rises to 500 °C, the crystals further grow to an average thickness of 300 nm (Fig. 4c). However, α-MoO3 nanoplates change to nanorods at the thermal treatment temperature of 600 °C (Fig. 4d). The nanorods are 7 μm long. TEM results further confirm that synthesis temperature has a significant impact on the crystal size and morphology of α-MoO3.
FT-IR analysis
Figure 5 shows the surface functional groups of α-MoO3 products determined with FT-IR. The strong band at 996 cm−1 is associated with the Mo=O stretching vibration, which is an indicator for the layered orthorhombic MoO3 phase. The band at 867 cm−1 is associated with the Mo-O-Mo stretching. The band at 595 cm−1 is the result of the Mo3O single bond. Furthermore, the MoO3 synthesized at 300 and 400 °C shows small difference with 500 and 600 °C, for instance, the band at 1622 and 3528 cm−1 were attributed to the stretching of O-H groups of adsorbed water on surface of MoO3 synthesized at 300 °C. It suggests that the AHM was not completely decomposed at 300 °C, which is consistent with the XRD results.
The texture properties of porous MoO3
MoO3 porous structure was determined with N2 adsorption/desorption method at 77 K. The adsorption isotherms are classified as type IV-isotherms according to Brunauer-Deming-Deming-Teller (BDDT) classification (Fig. 6a). It induces that the porous structure of the monolith contains mesopores and macropores. The mesopore size distribution is illustrated in the corresponding pore size distribution in Fig. 6b. The BET surface area, pore volume and BJH desorption average pore size of monoliths synthesized at different thermal treatment temperatures are summarized in Table 2. It shows that MoO3 synthesized at 400 °C has the highest BET surface area of 25.62 m2/g and a total pore volume of 0.13 cm3/g. In comparison, MoO3 synthesized at 500 and 600 °C has low BET surface area and pore volume. It suggests that with increase of sintering temperature the MoO3 grains grow to micron size and results in reduction in pore volume and BET surface area.
Table 2.
Sintering Temperature (°C) | BET surface area (m 2 /g) | Pore volume (cm 3 /g) | Pore size (nm) |
---|---|---|---|
300 | 22.20 | 0.09 | 15.86 |
400 | 25.62 | 0.13 | 20.76 |
500 | 8.95 | 0.04 | 19.60 |
600 | 10.63 | 0.07 | 21.90 |
XPS analysis
To further study the composition and chemical state, MoO3 synthesized at 400 °C was analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis. Figure 7a shows that the peaks in the spectra were assigned to Mo, O, and C. The C element results from the adventitious hydrocarbon from XPS instrument itself 34. No other impurities were found. The binding energies in the XPS analysis were obtained by referencing the C 1s signal at 284.5 eV. Figure 7b shows two peaks located at 232.8 eV and 236 eV can be indexed to the Mo 3d1/2 and Mo 3d3/2 signals, respectively, which can be assigned to Mo6+ valence state. The O 1s spectra of the sample were provided in Fig. 7c. The intense peak centered at 530.8 eV was attributed to O2− anions. In addition, the binding energy at 531.6 eV belongs to hydroxyl or water molecules that are absorbed on the surface of the sample35.
UV-Vis spectra analysis
Figure 8a shows the UV-Vis spectra collected from MoO3 prepared at different temperatures. When the preparation temperature was lower than 500 °C the absorbance of MoO3 for UV-light was increased and the absorption edge shows red shift which could be due to the grain growth and gradually increased particle size of MoO3. The band gaps of the samples were calculated using the Kubelka-Munk method36.
1 |
where C is a frequency-independent constant and α is the adsorption coefficient. The intercept from the extrapolation of the linear portion of the (αhv)1/2 ~ hv plot gives the band gap37 and is shown in Fig. 8b. The estimated band gap energy of the MoO3 synthesized at 300, 400, 500 and 600 °C were calculated to be 3.40, 2.85, 2.78 and 3.75 eV respectively.
PL analysis
Figure 9 shows the photoluminescence spectra of the porous MoO3 in the wavelength range between 400 and 800 nm under the excitation of 325 nm at room temperature. Two peaks at 440 nm and 481 nm in the emission spectrum is observed, corresponding to the recombination between the conduction bands and the valence bands. The increase of PL intensity corresponds to fast recombination of electron-hole pairs, indicating decrease of photocatalytic activity. In addition, an extra weak emission at 713 nm is observed when the temperature higher than 500 °C. The result shows the existence of a IB between the conduction bands and the valence bands. The existence of IB also led to recombination of electron-hole pairs and reduced the photocatalytic performance38. The relative positions among the CB, VB, and IB, as well as the two emissions are schematically shown in the inset of Fig. 9.
Adsorption and photocatalytic properties of the samples
The adsorption of contaminates molecules is a prerequisite for good photocatalytic activity39. Figure 10a shows the variation of the methyl blue (MB) concentration during its adsorption. It can be seen that the porous MoO3 established adsorption-desorption equilibrium in 30 min. In addition, the adsorption amounts of the catalysts decreased as the thermal treatment temperature increases. Figure 10b shows the photocatalytic activity of the as-synthesized MoO3. The as-synthesized MoO3 at 300 °C has the best adsorption performance and faded rate reached 98.4% after stirred for 30 min in the dark. MoO3 synthesized at 400 °C also has a high adsorption performance with decolorization efficiency of 53.1% under dark for 30 min and the rapid degradation efficiency with decolorization efficiency of 95.0%, 98.4% and 99.2% under visible illumination for 20, 30 and 60 min, respectively, which is higher than standard photocatalyst of TiO2 (P25). The stability of MoO3 was investigated for four cycles (Fig. 10c), and MoO3 synthesized at 400 °C remained active across several reaction cycles with decolorization efficiency of 98.1%, but the degradation efficiency of MoO3 synthesized at 300 °C decreased sharply in fourth cycle with decolorization efficiency of 64.6%. The kinetic studies of MB on MoO3 are calculated by using the pseudo-first-order kinetics model40 shown in Table 3.
2 |
Where k is the degradation rate, C 0 is the initial concentration of MB, and C t is the concentration of MB at reaction time t and MoO3 synthesized at 400 °C has the fastest reaction rate (k = 0.147 min−1). The presence of the hierarchically porous structure increases the surface area and enhances the surface adsorption of water and hydroxyl groups. Water and hydroxyl groups can react with the photo-induced holes on the surface of the catalyst to produce hydroxyl radicals, which is a strong oxidizing agent to degrade organic compounds and therefore improves the photocatalytic activity. MoO3 synthesized at 400 °C showed excellent photocatalytic performance and could potentially be used for photodegradation of pollutants under visible-light radiation.
Table 3.
Sintering Temperature (°C) | 300 | 400 | 500 | 600 |
k (min−1) | 0.112 | 0.147 | 0.051 | 0.036 |
In order to study the mechanism of the photodegradation, the corresponding effective scavengers were added to the reaction, namely isopropyl alcohol (IPA), triethanolamine (TEOA) and benzoquinone (BQ), respectively. IPA was employed to trap ·OH, TEOA scavenges h+ and BQ scavenges O2 ·− 41. As shown in Fig. 10d, the addition of IPA could induce the depression effect on the photodegradation of MB solution. Therefore, we can conclude that hydroxyl radicals were the main active species in the reaction systems.
Mechanism of the photocatalytic process
According to the results of the above, we propose a possible photocatalytic mechanism of porous MoO3, which is illustrated in Fig. 11. The conduction band and valence band potentials of the semiconductor were calculated by the following equation42:
3 |
4 |
where X is the absolute electronegativity of the semiconductor, which was defined as the geometric average of the absolute electronegativity of the constituent atoms, Ee is the energy of free electrons on the hydrogen scale (ca. 4.5 eV), and Eg is the band gap energy of the semiconductor43, 44.
Therefore, the conduction and valence band positions of MoO3 synthesized at 400 °C were calculated to be 0.47 eV and 3.32 eV, respectively. When MoO3 particles are irradiated with visible light photogenerated electrons-hole pair formed and photons can migrate to the catalyst surface and initiate redox reactions with the adsorbed H2O or -OH generating hydroxyl radicals (·OH)45. The major reaction steps in this photocatalytic mechanism are summarized as follows:
Conclusions
High purity orthorhombic MoO3 was successfully synthesized by freeze-drying and subsequent thermal treatment. The thermal treatment temperature had great impact on the the morphologies and photocatalytic activity of orthorhombic MoO3. MoO3 synthesized at 400 °C had bimodal pore structure and the band gap was calculated to be 2.85 eV. The photocatalytic performance of the as-synthesized MoO3 monitored through photodegradation of MB under visible radiation. Compared with other temperatures, the MoO3 synthesized at 400 °C exhibited an excellent photodegradation activity and recyclability. The decolorization efficiency increased to 99.2% in 60 min, and the decolorization efficiency still could reach to 98.1% after four cycles.
Experimental
Materials
The chemical reagents were analytical grade and were used without further purification. Methylene blue (Aladdin Industrial Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), Ammonium molybdate (AR, Tianjin Chemical Reagent Factory Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China), Polyvinyl Alcohol (86–89% hydrolyzed AR, Alfa Aesar Co., Ltd., United States).
Preparation of porous MoO3
First, 2.5 g Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA) was dissolved in 50.0 mL of deionized water. 1.0 g AHM was dissolved in 10.0 mL of PVA solution under heating at 80 °C in water bath. When the AHM completely dissolved, solution was poured into mould and kept for 12 h at −15 °C. Then freeze-drying was carried out at 8 Pa and −50 °C for 24 h. The freeze-dried compacts were subsequently heated in a muffle furnace at 300 °C, 400 °C, 500 °C and 600 °C for 3 h with a heating rate of 1 °C/min in air. These steps can be best seen in Fig. 12.
Characterization of MoO3
The crystal structure of MoO3 powder was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Bruker D8 advance, Germany) with a Cu-K α radiation source and settings of 30 mA and 40 KV at a scanning rate of 0.1 sec/step in the range from 5° to 70°. The surface morphology of the MoO3 powder was characterized by scanning election microscopy operated (SEM, Quanta 250, USA). The microstructure of the MoO3 powder was characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, FEI Tecnai G2 F20, USA). The presence of surface functional groups on the MoO3 crystals were evaluated with Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR, Bruker vertex 80 V, Germany) analysis from 400 to 4000 cm−1. The Brunaner-Emmett-Teller (BET) specific surface areas of the powders were analyzed by nitrogen adsorption (JW-BK122W, China). The composition of the MoO3 was analysis by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, ESCALAB 250Xi, USA). The transmittance and reflectance spectra of the films were recorded using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Lambda 750s, USA) in the spectral range 300–800 nm. Photoluminescence spectra of the samples were recorded using a Fluoscence spectrophotometer (VARIAN 3000, USA).
Photocatalytic properties characterization
Methylene blue (MB) was chosen as the representative organic pollutant to evaluate photocatalytic performance. The adsorption properties were performed in this study. 30 mg of photocatalyst powder was added to a 50 mL MB aqueous solution (30 mg/L) in the dark. During the adsorption, exactly 5 mL of suspension were taken from the reactor at given time intervals. A 150 W halogen lamp with a controlled voltage of 220 V was used as the energy source for photocatalysis. The distance between the surface of solution and the lamp was approximately 15 cm. Each 0.05 g of the as-synthesized MoO3 was dispersed in 100 mL of 30 mg/L MB solutions and stirred for 30 min in the dark to establish absorption-desorption equilibrium before testing. At periodic time intervals, 5 mL aliquots were sampled and ultimately centrifuged to extract particles. The percentage degradation of the dye was calculated via the following equation:
5 |
Where C 0 is initial absorbance of the dry solution before degradation, and C t is absorbance of the dye solution at time t 10.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51574241) and the bilateral project of NSFC-STINT (51611130064), and Program for Innovation Research Team of China University of Mining and Technology (2015QN004). Farid Akhtar acknowledges Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (SSF) for Infrastructure Fellowship Grant No. RIF14-0083.
Author Contributions
P.F. designed this work, L.Y. performed experiments and analyzed date, Z.W. and X.J. supervised this research. F.A. provided helpful suggestions for analysis, manuscript writing and revisions. All of the authors commented on the manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Georg A, Georg A, Krasovec U. Photoelectrochromic window with Pt catalyst. Thin Solid Films. 2006;502:246–251. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.07.291. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ghicov A, Yamamoto M, Schmuki P. Lattice widening in niobium-doped TiO2 nanotubes: efficient ion intercalation and swift electrochromic contrast. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2008;47:7934–7937. doi: 10.1002/anie.200802598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yang YL, Shen Y, Li Z. The dual-wavelength excitation photochromic behavior of organic induced MoO3 powders synthesized via a hydrothermal route. Powder Technol. 2015;279:233–239. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2015.04.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wang L, et al. Rapid microwave-assisted hydrothermal synthesis of one-dimensional MoO3 nanobelts. Mater. Lett. 2016;164:623–626. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2015.11.076. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Liu YL, et al. Hydrothermal synthesis of h-MoO3 microrods and their gas sensing properties to ethanol. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015;359:114–119. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.10.071. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Arfaoui A, et al. Structural, morphological, gas sensing and photocatalytic characterization of MoO3 and WO3 thin films prepared by the thermal vacuum evaporation technique. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015;357:1089–1096. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.09.124. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Santos E, de B, Sigoli FA, Mazali IO. Structural evolution in crystalline MoO3 nanoparticles with tunable size. J. Solid State Chem. 2012;190:80–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2012.02.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chiang TH, Ho PY, Chiu SY, Chao AC. Synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic activity of MoO3 particles utilizing different polyol monomers under visible light irradiation. J. Alloy. Compd. 2015;651:106–113. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.08.091. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wen JQ, et al. Photocatalysis fundamentals and surface modification of TiO2 nanomaterials. Chinese J. Catal. 2015;36:2049–2070. doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(15)60999-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Suarez-Quezada M, et al. Photodegradation of phenol using reconstructed Ce doped Zn/Al layered double hydroxides as photocatalysts. Catal. Today. 2016;271:213–219. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2016.01.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gyori Z, Konya Z, Kukovecz A. Visible light activation photocatalytic performance of PbSe quantum dot sensitized TiO2 Nanowires. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2015;179:583–588. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.05.056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Carevic M, et al. Structural, optical and photodegradation properties of pure and Fe-doped titania nanoparticles probed using simulated Solar light. Ceram. Int. 2016;42:1521–1529. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.09.100. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Moafi HF, Shojaie AF, Zanjanchi MA. The comparison of photocatalytic activity of synthesized TiO2 and ZrO2 nanosize onto wool fibers. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010;13:4310–4316. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.02.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gaigneaux EM, Fukui K, Twasawa Y. Morphology of crystalline α-MoO3 thin films spin-coated on Si (100) Thin Solid Films. 2000;374:49–58. doi: 10.1016/S0040-6090(00)01196-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lin SY, et al. Electrochromic properties of MoO3 thin films derived by a sol-gel process. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2010;53:51–58. doi: 10.1007/s10971-009-2055-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Manivel A, et al. Synthesis of MoO3 nanoparticles for azo dye degradation by catalytic ozonation. Mater. Res. Bull. 2015;62:184–191. doi: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2014.11.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Xia YC, Wu CS, Zhao N, Zhang YH. Spongy MoO3 hierarchical nanostructures for excellent performance ethanol sensor. Mater. Lett. 2016;171:117–120. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2015.12.159. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cui ZM, Yuan WY, Li CM. Template-mediated growth of microsphere, microbelt and nanorod alpha-MoO3 structures and their high pseudo-capacitances. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2013;1:12926–12931. doi: 10.1039/c3ta12688a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Li YQ, Liu TM, Li TM, Peng XH. Hydrothermal fabrication of controlled morphologies of MoO3 with CTAB: Structure and growth. Mater. Lett. 2015;140:48–50. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.10.153. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Li TM, Zang W, Zhang YY, Hussain S. Nanobelt-assembled nest-like MoO3 hierarchical structure: Hydrothermal synthesis and gas-sensing properties. Mater. Lett. 2015;160:476–479. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2015.08.031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cheng L, Shao MW, Wang XH, Hu HB. Single-Crystalline Molybdenum Trioxide Nanoribbons: Photocatalytic, Photoconductive, and Electrochemical Properties. Chem. Eur. J. 2009;15:2310–2316. doi: 10.1002/chem.200802182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ma Y, Zhang X, Yang M, Qi YX. Controlled growth of MoO3 nanorods on transparent conducting substrates. Mater. Lett. 2014;136:146–149. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.07.143. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chithambararaj A, Sanjini NS, Velmathi S, Chandra BA. Preparation of h-MoO3 and alpha-MoO3 nanocrystals: comparative study on photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue under visible light irradiation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013;15:14761–14769. doi: 10.1039/c3cp51796a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Schuh K, et al. Systematic study on the influence of the morphology of α-MoO3 in the selective oxidation of propylene. J. Solid State Chem. 2015;228:42–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2015.04.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhang HL, et al. 3D Pt/MoO3 nanocatalysts fabricated for effective electrocatalytic oxidation of alcohol. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015;356:294–300. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.082. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Szkodaa M, Trzcinski K, Siuzdakb K, Lisowska-Oleksiak A. Photocatalytical properties of maze-like MoO3 microstructures prepared by anodization of Mo plate. Electrochim. Acta. 2017;228:139–145. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.01.064. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sharma RK, Reddy GB. Effect of substrate temperature on the characteristics of α-MoO3 hierarchical 3D microspheres prepared by facile PVD process. J. Alloy. Compound. 2014;598:177–183. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.01.238. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Alizadeh S, Hassanzadeh-Tabrizi SA. MoO3 fibers and belts: Molten salt synthesis, characterization and optical properties. Ceram. Int. 2015;41:10839–10843. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.05.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yuan XS, et al. Room-temperature synthesis and solar photocatalytic performance of MoO3 · 0.5H2O nanorods. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015;357:968–974. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.071. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zhang HJ, Gao LJ, Gong YJ. Exfoliated MoO3 nanosheets for high-capacity lithium storage. Electrochem. Commun. 2015;52:67–70. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2015.01.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Qian L, Zhang HF. Controlled freezing and freeze drying: a versatile route for porous and micro-/nano-structured materials. J. Chem. Technol. Biot. 2011;86:172–184. doi: 10.1002/jctb.2495. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Parra MR, Haque FZ. Aqueous chemical route synthesis and the effect of calcination temperature on the structural and optical properties of ZnO nanoparticles. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2014;3:363–369. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2014.07.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yang QD, et al. Low Temperature Sonochemical Synthesis of Morphology Variable MoO3 Nanostructures for Performance Enhanced Lithium Ion Battery Applications. Electrochim. Acta. 2015;185:83–89. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.10.099. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bai SL, et al. Improvement of TiO2 photocatalytic properties under visible light by WO3/TiO2 and MoO3/TiO2 composites. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015;338:61–68. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.02.103. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wang JZ, et al. An efficient MoO3 catalyst for in-practical degradation of dye wastewater under room conditions. Catal. Commun. 2017;92:100–104. doi: 10.1016/j.catcom.2017.01.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chuai HY, et al. Characterization of V2O5/MoO3 composite photocatalysts prepared via electrospinning and their photodegradation activity for dimethyl phthalate. Chinese J. Catal. 2015;36:2194–2202. doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(15)61002-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Yang HB, et al. Photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue by MoO3 modified TiO2 under visible light. Chinese J. Catal. 2014;35:140–147. doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(12)60731-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chen CZ, Li Y, Tang XD. Evidence of oxygen vacancy and possible intermediate gap state in layered α-MoO3 single-crystal nanobelts. Physica B. 2016;481:192–196. doi: 10.1016/j.physb.2015.11.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wu FJ, et al. Enhanced photocatalytic degradation and adsorption of methylene blue via TiO2 nanocrystals supported on graphene-like bamboo charcoal. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015;358:425–435. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.161. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kamalakkannan J, Chandraboss VL, Karthikeyan B, Senthilvelan S. Synthesis of InMoO3-TiO2 nanocomposite - photocatalysis of genotoxic dye multiapplication study. Ceram. Int. 2016;42:10197–10208. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.03.138. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Madhusudan P, et al. One-pot template-free synthesis of porous CdMoO4 microspheres and their enhanced photocatalytic activity. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016;387:202–213. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.06.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Li X, Yu JG, Jaroniec M. Hierarchical photocatalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016;45:2603–2636. doi: 10.1039/C5CS00838G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Li X, et al. Engineering heterogeneous semiconductors for solar water splitting. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2015;3:2485–2534. doi: 10.1039/C4TA04461D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Xiang QJ, Yu JG, Wong PK. Quantitative characterization of hydroxyl radicals produced by various photocatalysts. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2011;357:163–167. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.01.093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ishibashi K, Fujishima A, Watanabe T, Hashimoto K. Detection of active oxidative species in TiO2 photocatalysis using the fluorescence technique. Electrochem. Commun. 2000;2:207–210. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2481(00)00006-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]