Skip to main content
Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry logoLink to Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry
. 2017 May 4;13:817–824. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.13.82

A practical and efficient approach to imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-fused isoquinolines through the post-GBB transformation strategy

Taofeng Shao 1, Zhiming Gong 1, Tianyi Su 1, Wei Hao 1, Chao Che 1,
Editor: David Spring
PMCID: PMC5433183  PMID: 28546839

Abstract

Diversity-oriented synthesis of the biologically intriguing imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-fused isoquinoline systems from readily available starting materials was achieved through the Groebke–Blackburn–Bienaymé reaction followed by a gold-catalyzed cyclization strategy. The synthetic approach is characterized by mild reaction conditions and a broad substrate scope, allowing for the rapid construction of structurally complex and diverse heterocycles in moderate to good yields.

Keywords: Groebke–Blackburn–Bienaymé reaction; imidazo[1,2-a]pyridines; isoquinolines; multicomponent reaction; Ugi reaction

Introduction

Imidazo[1,2-a]pyridines have been reported to display a wide range of biological activities [15], and these skeletons are found in various clinical drugs such as zolpidem (I), alpidem (II), and olprinone (III), which were approved for the treatment of insomnia, anxiety and acute heart failure, respectively (Figure 1) [6]. Furthermore, the isoquinoline motif represents a privileged medicinal skeleton widely found in a number of natural alkaloids and pharmaceutically active compounds [7]. Some of them exhibit diversified biological properties, including anti-inflammatory [8], antibacterial [9], antiviral [10], and antitumor activities [11]. For example, the natural alkaloids berberine (IV) and narciclasine (V) possess antiplasmodial and antiviral activity, respectively [1213]. Indotecan (VI) and its analog idimitecan (VII) were identified as topoisomerase I inhibitors, and were promoted into phase I clinical trials [14].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Representative bioactive imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine and isoquinoline-containing derivatives.

Multicomponent reactions (MCRs) [1519], comprising three or more components, provide straightforward approaches to a wide range of heterocycles through the formation of various bonds in a one-pot process. These reactions not only greatly accelerate chemical syntheses [20], but also allow access to diverse chemical structures [21] from readily accessible building blocks. In the past decades, considerable efforts have been made towards the development of new MCRs and their application to the diversity-oriented synthesis of biologically relevant molecules for drug discovery [2227].

The Ugi reaction [28], an elegant pioneer of a multicomponent reaction, represents a powerful synthetic tool to assemble versatile peptide-like compounds. It has found many applications in the facile synthesis of natural products and biologically interesting molecules [2930]. Although the Ugi-4CR generates linear α-acylamino-amides, a wide range of heterocycles are accessible through the combination with other transformations (post-transformation strategy) [31]. For example, the Ugi/Diels–Alder process leads to the formation of benzofurans and indoles [32] as well as to structurally complex polycyclic ring systems [33]; an Ugi/aza-Wittig process allowed for the synthesis of 2,5-disubstituted 1,3,4-oxadiazoles [34]; the Ugi/Pictet–Spengler sequence provided a rapid and efficient approach to polycyclic natural product-like alkaloids [35]. Accordingly, the combination of the Ugi reaction with other transformations proved to be powerful strategies for the efficient synthesis of novel heterocycles. In 1998, the Groebke–Blackburn–Bienaymé (GBB) reaction, an Ugi-3CR variant was discovered by three groups independently [3638]. The GBB reaction of an amidine, an aldehyde and an isocyanide proceeds through the isocyanide-involving formal [4 + 1] cycloaddition [39] affording the biologically important imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine scaffold. Due to the atom and step economy, high efficiency and intriguing biological profiles of the products, the GBB reaction has attracted broad attention in the field of organic synthesis [4042]. In order to expand the structural diversity of GBB products, further investigation of GBB-based synthetic strategies remains highly desirable.

In continuation of our research on the development of MCR strategies for the rapid library synthesis of biologically interesting heterocycles [4347], we were interested in a practical synthetic strategy towards imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-fused isoquinoline systems. We believe that this type of polycyclic systems may have interesting biological profiles [48]. Herein, we report our recent efforts on the development of a post-GBB transformation strategy for the concise synthesis of diverse imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-fused isoquinoline systems.

Results and Discussion

From a design perspective, we envisioned that the imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-fused isoquinoline 6a [4950] could be constructed through a GBB reaction/cyclization strategy (Scheme 1). The intermediate GBB product 4a could be constructed starting from 2-ethynylbenzaldehyde (2a) through an imine formation/formal [4 + 1] cycloaddition/[1,3]-H shift. The so obtained GBB product imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine 4a bearing an amino group and an acetylene unit may then undergo a sequential 6-exo-dig cyclization/retro-ene reaction to form the desired imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-fused isoquinoline 6a. The cyclization reaction could be realized with the aid of silver or gold catalysts [5152].

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

GBB-based MCR strategy for the imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-fused isoquinoline derivatives.

With this idea in mind, we commenced our studies by investigating the GBB reaction of 2-aminopyridine (1a), 2-ethynylbenzaldehyde (2a) and tert-butylisocyanide (3). The GBB reaction proceeded smoothly in MeOH in the presence of catalytic PTSA or HClO4 at room temperature to afford imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine 4a in 90% yield, and the cyclized product 6a was not detected under these mild conditions. Subsequent heating of 4a in refluxing 1,4-dioxane or toluene failed to deliver the expected product 6a, even under acidic or basic conditions.

Then, we turned to Ag and Au catalysts and investigated the metal-catalyzed intramolecular cyclization reaction of 4a and the results are collected in Table 1. First, we investigated AgOTf as the catalyst, which afforded the cyclized product 6a in 12% yield in refluxing CH2Cl2 in the presence of 10 mol % of catalyst. The yield was increased to 45% when replacing CH2Cl2 with CHCl3, whereas only a trace amount of the desired product was obtained in refluxing CH3CN or 1,4-dioxane (Table 1, entries 1–4). It revealed that the solvent plays a key role in this cyclization reaction. For comparison, we tested also AgSbF6 as the catalyst and it was found to be less effective than AgOTf (Table 1, entry 5). To improve the reaction efficiency, we next evaluated the cyclization reaction in refluxing CHCl3 in the presence of a range of Au catalysts. Although almost no reaction took place with Au(PPh3)Cl as the catalyst, the use of Au(PPh3)NTf2 resulted in a satisfactory yield (70%) of the product (Table 1, entries 6–9). Motivated by this result, other Au catalysts were further surveyed, and Au(JohnPhos)Cl was found to be the most efficient, delivering 6a in 78% yield (Table 1, entries 10–14). Next, the effect of the solvent on the reaction was tested and replacement of CHCl3 with CH3CN led to a slightly enhanced yield (83%) (Table 1, entries 15 and 16). Additionally, in refluxing CH3CN no other Au catalysts afforded better results than Au(JohnPhos)Cl (Table 1, entries 17 and 18). Overall, the optimal conditions for the cyclization reaction are as follows: Au(JohnPhos)Cl (10 mol %), CH3CN, reflux, 24 h.

Table 1.

Optimization of the cyclization reaction conditions.a

graphic file with name Beilstein_J_Org_Chem-13-817-i001.jpg

Entry Catalyst Solvent Yieldb (%)

1 AgOTf CH2Cl2 12
2 AgOTf CHCl3 45
3 AgOTf CH3CN trace
4 AgOTf dioxane trace
5 AgSbF6 CHCl3 38
6 Au(PPh3)Cl CHCl3 trace
7 Au(PPh3)OTf CHCl3 42
8 Au(PPh3)SbF6 CHCl3 21
9 Au(PPh3)NTf2 CHCl3 70
10 Au2(dppe) (SbF6)2 CHCl3 51
11 Au2(binap)( SbF6)2 CHCl3 53
12 Au(JohnPhos)Cl CHCl3 78
13 Au(JohnPhos)OTf CHCl3 42
14 Au(JohnPhos)SbF6 CHCl3 74
15 Au(JohnPhos)Cl CH3CN 83
16 Au(JohnPhos)Cl dioxane 49
17 Au2(dppe) Cl2 CH3CN 34
18 Au2(binap)Cl2 CH3CN 42

aGeneral conditions: substrate 4a (0.2 mmol), catalyst (10 mol %), solvent (2 mL) at reflux temperature for 24 h. bIsolated yield.

With the optimal conditions at hand, we then set out to explore the reaction scope for the library generation of structurally diverse imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-fused isoquinolines and the results are collected in Table 2. Initially, several GBB adducts 4 were synthesized through GBB reaction of amidines 1, substituted 2-ethynylbenzaldehydes 2 and tert-butylisocyanide (3). Indeed, the acetylene group in the aldehyde component had no obvious steric effect on the efficiency of the GBB reaction affording the GBB product in good to excellent yields in most cases. On the other hand, the substituent ortho to the amino group in the amidine component had a negative effect on the GBB reaction efficiency due to steric hindrance (Table 2, entries 6, 11, 13 and 17).

Table 2.

Substrate scope for the syntheses of compounds 4 and 6.a

Entry Starting materials GBB product 4 Yieldb (%) Cyclized product 6 Yieldb (%)

1 graphic file with name Beilstein_J_Org_Chem-13-817-i002.jpg Inline graphic
4b
94 Inline graphic
6b
72
2 graphic file with name Beilstein_J_Org_Chem-13-817-i005.jpg Inline graphic
4c
80 Inline graphic
6c
75
3 graphic file with name Beilstein_J_Org_Chem-13-817-i008.jpg Inline graphic
4d
62 Inline graphic
6d
61
4 graphic file with name Beilstein_J_Org_Chem-13-817-i011.jpg Inline graphic
4e
96 Inline graphic
6e
63
5 graphic file with name Beilstein_J_Org_Chem-13-817-i014.jpg Inline graphic
4f
89 Inline graphic
6f
78
6 graphic file with name Beilstein_J_Org_Chem-13-817-i017.jpg Inline graphic
4g
61 Inline graphic
6g
80
7 graphic file with name Beilstein_J_Org_Chem-13-817-i020.jpg Inline graphic
4h
85 Inline graphic
6h
56
8 graphic file with name Beilstein_J_Org_Chem-13-817-i023.jpg Inline graphic
4i
88 Inline graphic
6i
58
9 graphic file with name Beilstein_J_Org_Chem-13-817-i026.jpg Inline graphic
4j
64 Inline graphic
6j
78
10 graphic file with name Beilstein_J_Org_Chem-13-817-i029.jpg Inline graphic
4k
75 Inline graphic
6k
87
11 graphic file with name Beilstein_J_Org_Chem-13-817-i032.jpg Inline graphic
4l
49 Inline graphic
6l
79
12 graphic file with name Beilstein_J_Org_Chem-13-817-i035.jpg Inline graphic
4m
71 Inline graphic
6m
48
13 graphic file with name Beilstein_J_Org_Chem-13-817-i038.jpg Inline graphic
4n
47 Inline graphic
6n
55
14 graphic file with name Beilstein_J_Org_Chem-13-817-i041.jpg Inline graphic
4o
54 Inline graphic
6o
62
15 graphic file with name Beilstein_J_Org_Chem-13-817-i044.jpg Inline graphic
4p
95 Inline graphic
6p
63
16 graphic file with name Beilstein_J_Org_Chem-13-817-i047.jpg Inline graphic
4q
74 Inline graphic
6q
58
17 graphic file with name Beilstein_J_Org_Chem-13-817-i050.jpg Inline graphic
4r
43 Inline graphic
6r
67
18 graphic file with name Beilstein_J_Org_Chem-13-817-i053.jpg Inline graphic
4s
57 Inline graphic
6s
59

aGBB reaction conditions: 1 (0.5 mmol), 2 (0.5 mmol), 3 (0.6 mmol), MeOH (1 mL); PTSA (5%), room temperature, 12h; annulation conditions: substrate 4 (0.2 mmol), Au(JohnPhos)Cl (10 mol %), CH3CN (2 mL) at reflux temperature for 24 h. bIsolated yields.

Then, the newly generated GBB adducts 4bs were exposed to the established cyclization conditions to deliver the corresponding imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-fused isoquinolines 6bs in moderate to good yields, and their structures were unambiguously confirmed by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and HRMS analysis. Various functionalities related to the amidine and aldehyde components, including electron-donating methoxy and methyl groups or electron-withdrawing halides, were well tolerated. Generally, the substitution pattern of the amidine moiety had little effect on the Au-catalyzed annulation reaction, whereas neutral or electron-donating groups on the aldehyde moiety gave a higher yield in comparison with the electron-withdrawing halides. Notably, bromo-substituted substrates were also tolerated the reaction conditions, allowing for the further manipulation through various cross-coupling reaction (Table 2, entry 9).

Conclusion

In conclusion, we have developed a practical and efficient synthetic approach to structurally diverse imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-fused isoquinolines with moderate to good yields through the GBB multicomponent reaction/Au-catalyzed cyclization strategy. The described method provides a new tool for a rapid compound library generation from readily accessible starting materials. Further, the protocol tolerates a broad substrate scope, which will make it attractive for the application in parallel synthesis and combinatorial chemistry.

Experimental

Typical procedure for the GBB multicomponent reaction. To a solution of 2-aminopyridine (1a, 0.5 mmol), 2-ethynylbenzaldehyde (2a, 0.5 mmol), and tert-butylisocyanide (3, 0.6 mmol) in 1 mL of methanol were added p-toluenesulfonic acid (4.7 mg, 0.025 mmol) and the reaction mixture was stirred at rt for 12 h. The mixture was diluted with 15 mL of dichloromethane and washed successively with water (10 mL), saturated NaHCO3 solution (10 mL) and brine (10 mL). After drying over anhydrous Na2SO4, the mixture was concentrated under vacuum and the resulting residue was purified by flash chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 8:1) to afford GBB adduct 4a (90% yield).

Typical procedure for the Au-catalyzed cyclization reaction. To a solution of the GBB adduct 4 (0.2 mmol) in 2 mL of acetonitrile was added Au(JohnPhos)Cl (0.02 mmol) and the resulting mixture was stirred under inert atmosphere at reflux temperature for 24 h. Then, the solvent was removed under vacuum and the residue purified by flash chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate 5:1) to afford the desired product 6.

Supporting Information

File 1

Characterization data for all compounds and copies of NMR spectra for compounds 6as.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Shenzhen Basic Research Project (Grants No. JCYJ20140417144423193, and JSGG20140717102922014), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21102006) and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (Grant No. 2014A030312004) for financial support.

References

  • 1.Tantry S J, Markad S D, Shinde V, Bhat J, Balakrishnan G, Gupta A K, Ambady A, Raichurkar A, Kedari C, Sharma S, et al. J Med Chem. 2017;60:1379–1399. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Shukla N M, Salunke D B, Yoo E, Mutz C A, Balakrishna R, David S A. Bioorg Med Chem. 2012;20:5850–5863. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2012.07.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hamdouchi C, de Blas J, del Prado M, Gruber J, Heinz B A, Vance L. J Med Chem. 1999;42:50–59. doi: 10.1021/jm9810405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Frett B, McConnell N, Smith C C, Wang Y, Shah N P, Li H-y. Eur J Med Chem. 2015;94:123–131. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.02.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bode M L, Gravestock D, Moleele S S, van der Westhuyzen C W, Pelly S C, Steenkamp P A, Hoppe H C, Khan T, Nkabinde L A. Bioorg Med Chem. 2011;19:4227–4237. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2011.05.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Enguehard-Gueiffier C, Gueiffier A. Mini-Rev Med Chem. 2007;7:888–899. doi: 10.2174/138955707781662645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bentley K W. Nat Prod Rep. 1998;15:341–362. doi: 10.1039/a815341y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Charpiot B, Bitsch F, Buchheit K-H, Channez P, Mazzoni L, Mueller T, Vachier I, Naef R. Bioorg Med Chem. 2001;9:1793–1805. doi: 10.1016/S0968-0896(01)00077-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kim S-H, Shin D-S, Oh M-N, Chung S-C, Lee J-S, Oh K-B. Biosci, Biotechnol, Biochem. 2004;68:421–424. doi: 10.1271/bbb.68.421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kartsev V G. Med Chem Res. 2004;13:325–336. doi: 10.1007/s00044-004-0038-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chaniyara R, Kapuriya N, Dong H, Lee P-C, Suman S, Marvania B, Chou T-C, Lee T-C, Kakadiya R, Shah A, et al. Bioorg Med Chem. 2011;19:275–286. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2010.11.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wright C W, Marshall S J, Russell P F, Anderson M M, Phillipson J D, Kirby G C, Warhurst D C, Schiff P L., Jr J Nat Prod. 2000;63:1638–1640. doi: 10.1021/np000144r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gabrielsen B, Monath T P, Huggins J W, Kefauver D F, Pettit G R, Groszek G, Hollingshead M, Kirsi J J, Shannon W M, Schubert E M, et al. J Nat Prod. 1992;55:1569–1581. doi: 10.1021/np50089a003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Peterson K E, Cinelli M A, Morrell A E, Mehta A, Dexheimer T S, Agama K, Antony S, Pommier Y, Cushman M. J Med Chem. 2011;54:4937–4953. doi: 10.1021/jm101338z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dömling A, Ugi I. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2000;39:3168–3210. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20000915)39:18<3168::AID-ANIE3168>3.0.CO;2-U. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dömling A. Chem Rev. 2006;106:17–89. doi: 10.1021/cr0505728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhu J, Bienaymé H, editors. Multicomponent Reactions. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Koopmanschap G, Ruijter E, Orru R V A. Beilstein J Org Chem. 2014;10:544–598. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.10.50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rotstein B H, Zaretsky S, Rai V, Yudin A K. Chem Rev. 2014;114:8323–8359. doi: 10.1021/cr400615v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bienaymé H, Hulme C, Oddon G, Schmitt P. Chem – Eur J. 2000;6:3321–3329. doi: 10.1002/1521-3765(20000915)6:18<3321::AID-CHEM3321>3.0.CO;2-A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wess J, Urmann M, Sickenberger B. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2001;40:3341–3350. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20010917)40:18<3341::AID-ANIE3341>3.0.CO;2-D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Koszytkowska-Stawińska M, Buchowicz W. Beilstein J Org Chem. 2014;10:1706–1732. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.10.179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Haji M. Beilstein J Org Chem. 2016;12:1269–1301. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.12.121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hulme C, Ayaz M, Martinez-Ariza G, Medda F, Shaw A. Recent Advances in Multicomponent Reaction Chemistry: Applications in Small Molecule Drug Discovery. In: Czechtizky W, Hamley P, editors. Small Molecule Medicinal Chemistry: Strategies and Technologies. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH; 2015. pp. 145–187. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dömling A, Wang W, Wang K. Chem Rev. 2012;112:3083–3135. doi: 10.1021/cr100233r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Akritopoulou-Zanze I. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2008;12:324–331. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2008.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Weber L. Curr Med Chem. 2002;9:2085–2093. doi: 10.2174/0929867023368719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ugi I, Steinbrückner C. Angew Chem. 1960;72:267–268. doi: 10.1002/ange.19600720709. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Touré B B, Hall D G. Chem Rev. 2009;109:4439–4486. doi: 10.1021/cr800296p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bauer S M, Armstrong R W. J Am Chem Soc. 1999;121:6355–6366. doi: 10.1021/ja9811243. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhu J. Eur J Org Chem. 2003:1133–1144. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.200390167. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lu K, Luo T, Xiang Z, You Z, Fathi R, Chen J, Yang Z. J Comb Chem. 2005;7:958–967. doi: 10.1021/cc050099b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lee D, Sello J K, Schreiber S L. Org Lett. 2000;2:709–712. doi: 10.1021/ol005574n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ramazani A, Rezaei A. Org Lett. 2010;12:2852–2855. doi: 10.1021/ol100931q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wang W, Ollio S, Herdtweck E, Dömling A. J Org Chem. 2011;76:637–644. doi: 10.1021/jo102058s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Groebke K, Weber L, Mehlin F. Synlett. 1998:661–663. doi: 10.1055/s-1998-1721. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Blackburn C, Cuan B, Fleming P, Shiosaki K, Tsai S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998;39:3635–3638. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4039(98)00653-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bienaymé H, Bouzid K. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 1998;37:2234–2237. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19980904)37:16<2234::AID-ANIE2234>3.0.CO;2-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kruithof A, Ruijter E, Orru R V A. Chem – Asian J. 2015;10:508–520. doi: 10.1002/asia.201403207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hulme C, Lee Y-S. Mol Diversity. 2008;12:No. 1. doi: 10.1007/s11030-008-9072-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Devi N, Rawal R K, Singh V. Tetrahedron. 2015;71:183–232. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2014.10.032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Shaaban B, Abdel-Wahab B F. Mol Diversity. 2016;20:233–254. doi: 10.1007/s11030-015-9602-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Che C, Xiang J, Wang G-X, Fathi R, Quan J-M, Yang Z. J Comb Chem. 2007;9:982–989. doi: 10.1021/cc070058a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Che C, Li S, Jiang X, Quan J, Lin S, Yang Z. Org Lett. 2010;12:4682–4685. doi: 10.1021/ol1020477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Che C, Li S, Yu Z, Li F, Xin S, Zhou L, Lin S, Yang Z. ACS Comb Sci. 2013;15:202–207. doi: 10.1021/co400001h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Che C, Yang B, Jiang X, Shao T, Yu Z, Tao C, Li S, Lin S. J Org Chem. 2014;79:436–440. doi: 10.1021/jo4024792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Yang B, Tao C, Shao T, Gong J, Che C. Beilstein J Org Chem. 2016;12:1487–1492. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.12.145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Xiang J, Yang H, Che C, Zou H, Yang H, Wei Y, Quan J, Zhang H, Yang Z, Lin S. PLoS One. 2009;4:e4361. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Guchhait S K, Chaudhary V, Madaan C. Org Biomol Chem. 2012;10:9271–9277. doi: 10.1039/c2ob26733k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Chavignon O, Raihane M, Deplat P, Chabard J L, Gueiffier A, Blache Y, Dauphin G, Teulade J C. Heterocycles. 1995;41:2019–2026. doi: 10.3987/COM-95-7126. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Miaskiewicz S, Gaillard B, Kern N, Weibel J-M, Pale P, Blanc A. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2016;55:9088–9092. doi: 10.1002/anie.201604329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mirabdolbaghi R, Dudding T. Org Lett. 2015;17:1930–1933. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b00617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

File 1

Characterization data for all compounds and copies of NMR spectra for compounds 6as.


Articles from Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry are provided here courtesy of Beilstein-Institut

RESOURCES