Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1979 Nov;64(5):749–753. doi: 10.1104/pp.64.5.749

Photosynthate Partitioning into Starch in Soybean Leaves

I. Effects of Photoperiod versus Photosynthetic Period Duration

N Jerry Chatterton 1, John E Silvius 1
PMCID: PMC543353  PMID: 16661047

Abstract

Photosynthesis, photosynthate partitioning into foliar starch, and translocation were investigated in soybean plants (Glycine max (L.) Merr. cv. Amsoy 71), grown under different photoperiods and photosynthetic periods to determine the controls of leaf starch accumulation. Starch accumulation rates in soybean leaves were inversely related to the length of the daily photosynthetic period under which the plants were grown. Photosynthetic period and not photoperiod per se appears to be the important factor. Plants grown in a 14-hour photosynthetic period partitioned approximately 60% of the daily foliar accumulation into starch whereas 7-hour plants partitioned about 90% of their daily foliar accumulation into starch. The difference in starch accumulation resulted from a change in photosynthate partitioning between starch and leaf residual dry weight. Residual dry weight is defined as leaf dry weight minus the weight of total nonstructural carbohydrates. Differences in photosynthate partitioning into starch were also associated with changes in photosynthetic and translocation rates, as well as with leaf and whole plant morphology. It is concluded that leaf starch accumulation is a programmed process and not simply the result of a limitation in translocation.

Full text

PDF
749

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Clauss H., Mortimer D. C., Gorham P. R. Time-course Study of Translocation of Products of Photosynthesis in Soybean Plants. Plant Physiol. 1964 Mar;39(2):269–273. doi: 10.1104/pp.39.2.269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Heldt H. W., Chon C. J., Maronde D. Role of orthophosphate and other factors in the regulation of starch formation in leaves and isolated chloroplasts. Plant Physiol. 1977 Jun;59(6):1146–1155. doi: 10.1104/pp.59.6.1146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Silvius J. E., Kremer D. F., Lee D. R. Carbon assimilation and translocation in soybean leaves at different stages of development. Plant Physiol. 1978 Jul;62(1):54–58. doi: 10.1104/pp.62.1.54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Thorne J. H., Koller H. R. Influence of assimilate demand on photosynthesis, diffusive resistances, translocation, and carbohydrate levels of soybean leaves. Plant Physiol. 1974 Aug;54(2):201–207. doi: 10.1104/pp.54.2.201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Upmeyer D. J., Koller H. R. Diurnal trends in net photosynthetic rate and carbohydrate levels of soybean leaves. Plant Physiol. 1973 May;51(5):871–874. doi: 10.1104/pp.51.5.871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES