Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 2005 Jan;187(2):554–566. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.2.554-566.2005

Staphylococcus aureus Serves as an Iron Source for Pseudomonas aeruginosa during In Vivo Coculture

Lauren M Mashburn 1,2, Amy M Jett 2, Darrin R Akins 2, Marvin Whiteley 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC543556  PMID: 15629927

Abstract

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a gram-negative opportunistic human pathogen often infecting the lungs of individuals with the heritable disease cystic fibrosis and the peritoneum of individuals undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Often these infections are not caused by colonization with P. aeruginosa alone but instead by a consortium of pathogenic bacteria. Little is known about growth and persistence of P. aeruginosa in vivo, and less is known about the impact of coinfecting bacteria on P. aeruginosa pathogenesis and physiology. In this study, a rat dialysis membrane peritoneal model was used to evaluate the in vivo transcriptome of P. aeruginosa in monoculture and in coculture with Staphylococcus aureus. Monoculture results indicate that approximately 5% of all P. aeruginosa genes are differentially regulated during growth in vivo compared to in vitro controls. Included in this analysis are genes important for iron acquisition and growth in low-oxygen environments. The presence of S. aureus caused decreased transcription of P. aeruginosa iron-regulated genes during in vivo coculture, indicating that the presence of S. aureus increases usable iron for P. aeruginosa in this environment. We propose a model where P. aeruginosa lyses S. aureus and uses released iron for growth in low-iron environments.


Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a gram-negative opportunistic human pathogen commonly found in water and soil. P. aeruginosa causes a number of chronic and acute infections and is noted for its inherent resistance to many clinically relevant antibiotics. Two of the most common infections caused by P. aeruginosa are chronic colonization of the lungs of individuals with the genetic disease cystic fibrosis (CF) (19) and peritonitis in individuals undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) (25). The lungs of CF patients are commonly colonized before the age of 8, and most individuals maintain these infections throughout their lifetimes. High infection rates are also associated with CAPD, which is often used to treat end-stage renal disease.

P. aeruginosa physiology and gene expression during in vivo growth is largely unknown. Using in vivo expression technology (IVET), Wang et al. identified 19 P. aeruginosa genes inducible during growth in a neutropenic mouse (40). Although that study identified several new genes important for virulence in P. aeruginosa, it did not provide a comprehensive analysis of in vivo gene expression. Two recent studies using Pasteurella multocida and Borrelia burgdorferi have provided a more comprehensive view of in vivo bacterial gene expression by using DNA microarrays (3, 4, 33). These studies illustrate that a significant number of genes (2 to 8% of all the genes in the genomes) are differentially regulated in vivo, suggesting that the in vivo environment is distinct from normal in vitro culture conditions.

Although evaluation of the transcriptomes of in vivo-grown bacteria provides a snapshot of transcription under monoculture growth conditions, it is clear that many infections are not simply the result of colonization by one bacterium but rather the pathogenic contributions of several bacteria (10, 19, 20, 22, 46). Such is the case for P. aeruginosa infections, particularly in the CF lung, which often consist of a consortium of pathogenic bacteria, including Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae (19, 23). As with most bacteria, studies of P. aeruginosa pathogenesis have primarily focused on monoculture infections; consequently, little is known about interspecies interactions in polymicrobial infections. Although bacterium-bacterium interactions in vivo will be affected by numerous factors both spatial and temporal, it is possible that in some circumstances interspecies interactions may affect the course of disease.

To provide a more comprehensive analysis of P. aeruginosa gene expression in vivo, we used Affymetrix GeneChips to examine the transcriptome of P. aeruginosa growing as a monoculture and in coculture with S. aureus in the rat peritoneum. Our studies indicate that approximately 5% of all P. aeruginosa genes are differentially regulated during monoculture growth within the peritoneum compared to in vitro conditions. These results indicate that the peritoneum is a low-oxygen, iron-limited environment, and the presence of S. aureus increases usable iron for P. aeruginosa in vivo. We propose a model where P. aeruginosa lyses S. aureus during coculture and gains access to sequestered iron. Our data suggest that P. aeruginosa pathogenesis and physiology are influenced by the presence of S. aureus, thereby implicating the importance of studying interspecies interactions to understand P. aeruginosa pathogenesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains, plasmids, and media.

P. aeruginosa strain UCBPP-PA14 (30) and S. aureus strain MN8 (35) were used in these studies. P. aeruginosa PA14-LM1 containing a Tn5 insertion in pqsA was obtained from a publicly available transposon database (http://pga.mgh.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/pa14/mutants/retrieve.cgi). Bacteria were grown in morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS) minimal medium containing 50 mM MOPS (pH 7.2), 93 mM NH4Cl, 43 mM NaCl, 2 mM KH2PO4, 1 mM MgSO4, 3.5 μM FeSO4, and 20 mM glucose or 20 mM sodium succinate as the sole source of carbon and energy. For in vitro growth of S. aureus, 0.5% yeast extract and 0.5% Casamino Acids were added to the MOPS medium. For low-iron medium, MOPS minimal medium without added FeSO4 and containing 20 mM sodium succinate was chelexed two times overnight at 4°C using Chelex 100 (10 g/liter; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.). For differential isolation of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus in coculture, pseudomonas isolation agar and Baird Parker agar were used, respectively (Remel, Lenexa, Kans.). Brain heart infusion (BHI; Difco, Detroit, Mich.) agar was used for coculture on petri plates.

Dialysis membrane chambers.

Spectra/Por (Spectrum Medical Industries Inc., Los Angeles, Calif.) dialysis tubing with a molecular mass exclusion of molecules larger than 8,000 Da was rinsed in sterile water for 5 min and then boiled for 20 min in sterile water containing 1 mM EDTA. The bags were then rinsed with sterile water for 10 min, transferred to MOPS minimal medium to cool, and tied at one end using strict aseptic technique. Each bag was then filled with 10 ml of MOPS minimal medium containing either 2,000 P. aeruginosa cells/ml or a binary culture of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus each at 1,000 cells/ml. Stationary-phase cultures of MOPS medium-grown P. aeruginosa and S. aureus cells were the source of inocula for these experiments. After inoculation, the dialysis bags were tied at the other end, and excess tubing was removed from the ends of the dialysis bag. Four- to 6-week-old Sprague-Dawley rats (Sprague-Dawley Inc., Indianapolis, Ind.) were anesthetized by subcutaneous injection with a mixture of ketamine (50 mg/ml), xylazine (5 mg/ml), and acepromazine (1 mg/ml) at a dose of 1 ml/kg of body weight. The inoculated dialysis bags were then implanted into the rat's peritoneal cavity as outlined previously (1). At the desired time, the dialysis bags were explanted from the rats and rinsed with sterile MOPS minimal medium, and bacteria were removed using a sterile syringe.

Analysis of global gene expression using Affymetrix GeneChips.

Dialysis bags containing P. aeruginosa or P. aeruginosa-S. aureus cocultures were explanted from the rats at 18 h (optical density at 600 nm [OD600] = 0.3 to 0.4). In vivo-grown bacteria were removed from the dialysis bags by using a sterile syringe and mixed 1:1 with the RNA-stabilizing agent RNALater (Ambion, Austin, Tex.). To serve as an in vitro comparison, P. aeruginosa was grown aerobically in MOPS minimal medium containing either 20 mM glucose or 20 mM succinate to an OD600 of 0.4 and mixed 1:1 with RNALater. DNA-free RNA was isolated from in vitro- and in vivo-grown P. aeruginosa as outlined elsewhere, except for cocultures of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus, where the lysozyme-lysostaphin treatment was omitted (36). RNA integrity was monitored by gel electrophoresis of glyoxylated samples. Preparation of labeled cDNA and processing of the P. aeruginosa GeneChip arrays was performed as previously described (36). Washing, staining, and scanning of the GeneChips were performed by the University of Iowa DNA Core Facility using an Affymetrix fluidics station. GeneChips were performed in duplicate or triplicate for each culture condition. Data were analyzed using Microarray Suite software, and only genes exhibiting regulation levels of fivefold or greater are reported. Verification of GeneChip data was performed with semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) using Superscript II (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.) as described previously (31). PA2426 (pvdS), PA2247 (bkdA1), and PA1717 (pscD) were confirmed using PA1802 (clpX) as the constitutively expressed control.

Lysis of S. aureus.

Lysis of S. aureus on petri plates was performed by thoroughly swabbing a BHI plate with an overnight culture of S. aureus diluted to an OD600 of 0.1. After drying, 5 μl of an overnight culture of P. aeruginosa was spotted onto the petri plate, dried, and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Plates were imaged using an Alpha-Innotech documentation system.

P. aeruginosa growth yields.

For growth yield experiments using S. aureus as a source of iron, overnight bacterial cultures were centrifuged at 5,000 × g for 5 min and washed (three times) in chelexed MOPS minimal succinate medium. P. aeruginosa and S. aureus were then resuspended in chelexed MOPS minimal succinate medium (no added FeSO4) to an OD600 of 2.0 and 100, respectively. P. aeruginosa was then mixed 1:1 with S. aureus or chelexed MOPS minimal succinate medium (as a no-iron control). A sterile 25-mm polycarbonate membrane was placed onto a chelexed MOPS minimal succinate plate solidified with 1% agarose and allowed to dry. Five-microliter aliquots of these mixtures were placed onto the polycarbonate membrane, allowed to dry, and incubated at 37°C for 24 h (12). Membranes were resuspended in 1 ml MOPS minimal medium, and serial dilutions were performed. Viable bacteria were quantitated using pseudomonas isolation agar and Baird Parker agar plates. S. aureus does not grow on MOPS minimal succinate medium due to amino acid auxotrophy. To examine if P. aeruginosa could use lysed S. aureus as a source of iron, S. aureus (1 ml of OD600 = 100) was mechanically lysed by bead beating for 30 min in a Biospec Products minibead beater as outlined by the manufacturer (Biospec Products, Bartlesville, Okla.) with 0.1-mm beads. After filter sterilization, chelexed minimal succinate agarose plates containing mechanically lysed S. aureus (1/14 dilution) were used to grow P. aeruginosa as outlined above. To ensure the chelexed succinate plates were iron limited, P. aeruginosa was also grown with 10 μM FeSO4 added to the solidified medium.

RESULTS

Monitoring growth of P. aeruginosa in vivo.

The opportunistic human pathogen P. aeruginosa primarily causes infections in individuals with compromised immune systems. These infections often occur in the lungs of individuals with the heritable disease CF (19) and the peritoneum of individuals undergoing CAPD (25). Although a number of in vivo models exist to study P. aeruginosa lung and peritoneal pathogenesis (14, 29, 43-45), most of these models do not possess the versatility to perform genome-scale gene expression studies and study multispecies consortia. To begin to understand in vivo gene expression, we grew P. aeruginosa in a dialysis membrane chamber (DMC) implanted into the peritoneal cavity of a rat (1). In this in vivo model, P. aeruginosa undergoes a typical planktonic growth curve with a doubling time similar to that of in vitro glucose-grown bacteria (approximately 50 min in the DMC and 40 min in glucose minimal medium) (Fig. 1). Final bacterial densities achieved by P. aeruginosa in the DMC were greater than 1010 bacteria. Although the DMC model does not allow direct interactions with host cells, P. aeruginosa is growing on peritoneal contents; thus, we will refer to this model as an in vivo batch culture model.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Growth of P. aeruginosa in vitro in MOPS minimal medium with 20 mM glucose (▪) and in vivo in the DMC in the rat (▴). Representative growth curves are shown. Maximum doubling times were approximately 40 min in vitro and 50 min in vivo.

Identification and classification of P. aeruginosa genes differentially expressed in the peritoneum.

Although most laboratory experiments evaluating bacterial gene expression are conducted in vitro, in vivo growth conditions are difficult to mimic in the laboratory. To begin to understand the physiology of in vivo-grown P. aeruginosa, we performed transcriptome analyses of DMC-grown and in vitro-grown P. aeruginosa using Affymetrix GeneChips. As in vitro comparisons, P. aeruginosa was grown in MOPS minimal medium containing 20 mM glucose or 20 mM sodium succinate as the sole source of carbon and energy. To eliminate carbon source-specific genes from our analysis, only genes differentially expressed in vivo compared to glucose- and succinate-grown bacteria are reported.

Bacteria were harvested for GeneChip analysis at mid-logarithmic phase (OD600 = 0.3 to 0.5) under both in vitro and in vivo conditions, and gene expression profiles were compared using Affymetrix Microarray Suite software. On average, 71% of the gene-specific tiles present on the Affymetrix GeneChip hybridized at levels sufficient for statistical analysis; thus, we were able to compare expression profiles of approximately 4,000 genes. A total of 316 genes (approximately 5% of all P. aeruginosa genes) were differentially regulated at least fivefold during growth of P. aeruginosa in vivo compared to the in vitro controls. Of these genes, the majority were up-regulated (238 genes), while a smaller number were repressed (78 genes). As validation of our GeneChip results, we observed similar regulation patterns for PA2426 (pvdS), PA2247 (bkdA1), and PA1717 (pscD) using semiquantitaive RT-PCR (Fig. 2 and data not shown).

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Lysis of S. aureus is necessary for iron acquisition by P. aeruginosa during coculture. (A) A BHI petri plate was swabbed with a confluent lawn of S. aureus, and 5 μl of an overnight culture of wild-type P. aeruginosa PA14 and P. aeruginosa PA14-LM1 containing a Tn5 insertion in pqsA were spotted on the plate and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. A zone of clearing (indicating lysis of S. aureus) is visible around the wild-type P. aeruginosa colony. Similar lysis results were also observed in test tube coculture experiments (data not shown). Although not shown here, approximately 20% of the time P. aeruginosa PA14-LM1 produces a small zone of lysis in this assay. (B) Semiquantitative RT-PCR analysis of the low-iron-inducible gene pvdS and the constitutively expressed clpX gene (42). P. aeruginosa was grown in vitro in glucose minimal medium containing excess FeSO4 (3.5 μM) or in vivo as a monoculture or in coculture with S. aureus. P. aeruginosa PA14-LM1, which is unable to lyse S. aureus but possesses no observed growth defects under iron-limited conditions, was also grown in vivo in coculture with S. aureus.

Genes in the sequenced P. aeruginosa genome are grouped into a number of classes based on functionality (www.pseudomonas.com). Classification of our in vivo-regulated genes revealed that most of these genes (33%) are of unknown function (Table 1). This is not surprising, given the observation that 45% of the 5,570 predicted P. aeruginosa genes have little homology to known proteins (37). The remaining genes are included in several classes, some of which possess distinct patterns of regulation. Most of the classes primarily include genes which are induced during in vivo growth, while all the genes in one group (bacteriophage/transposon) were repressed (Table 1). One of the most striking features of these data is that 29 transcriptional activators were induced during growth in vivo, indicating specific responses to the peritoneal environment. Only one gene involved in motility and attachment was differentially regulated during in vivo growth, indicating that these processes are quite similar with regard to transcription during in vitro and in vivo growth. Although no genes involved in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) biosynthesis were differentially expressed, it should be noted that most of the genes involved in O-antigen biosynthesis did not hybridize at levels sufficient for analysis. This is not surprising given the fact that we are not using the sequenced P. aeruginosa PAO1 strain, and O-antigen genes are highly divergent among P. aeruginosa strains (32).

TABLE 1.

Classes of in vivo-induced genes

Functional classa No. activatedb No. repressedb
Adaptation, protection 10 2
Amino acid biosynthesis and metabolism 17 6
Biosynthesis of cofactors 7 3
Carbon compound catabolism 3 2
Cell wall-LPS 1 0
Central intermediary metabolism 4 1
Chaperones and heat shock protein 2 0
Energy metabolism 25 6
Membrane proteins 2 0
Motility and attachment 1 0
Nucleotide biosynthesis and metabolism 1 0
Protein-secretion-export apparatus 4 0
Putative enzymes 15 2
Related to phage, transposon, plasmid 0 11
Secreted factors 2 0
Transcriptional regulators 29 2
Translation, posttranslational modification, degradation 1 0
Transport of small molecules 32 18
Two-component regulatory systems 3 0
Hypothetical proteins 65 19
Unknown (conserved hypothetical) 14 6
a

Functional classes are from the P. aeruginosa genome website (www.pseudomonas.com).

b

Genes that were activated or repressed in the DMC at least fivefold compared to cells grown in vitro in MOPS medium.

Correlation of GeneChip and IVET data.

Using IVET and a neutropenic mouse model, Wang et al. identified 19 genes induced during growth of P. aeruginosa in vivo (40). An examination of our in vivo-regulated genes indicated that of these 19 IVET genes, 6 did not hybridize at levels sufficient for GeneChip analysis, 10 were not differentially regulated, 2 were induced over fivefold in our DMC model (Table 2), and 1 was induced threefold in the DMC (PA4115). The two IVET genes induced over fivefold in our DMC model, np20 (PA5499) and fptA (PA4221), have been partially characterized in P. aeruginosa (2, 39, 40). The np20 gene was up-regulated approximately sixfold in the DMC and encodes a polypeptide with homology to a number of transcriptional regulators. The np20 locus is important for pathogenesis of P. aeruginosa (40). The fptA gene encodes a receptor for the siderophore pyochelin (discussed below) and is up-regulated approximately 81-fold in the DMC model (2).

TABLE 2.

P. aeruginosa genes differentially regulated during in vivo growth

ORFa Gene Homology or functiona Fold regulationb
0149 Probable sigma-70 factor 7
0171 Hypothetical protein −8
0200 Hypothetical protein 7
0280 cysA Sulfate transport protein −11
0281 cysW Sulfate transport protein −17
0282 cysT Sulfate transport protein −11
0283 sbp Sulfate-binding protein precursor −15
0284 Hypothetical protein −17
0440* Probable oxidoreductase 7
0466 Hypothetical protein −7
0509* nirN Probablec-type cytochrome 7
0510 Probable uroporphyrin III c-methyltransferase 13
0511* nirJ Heme d1 biosynthesis protein 7
0512 Conserved hypothetical protein 8
0513 Probable transcriptional regulator 8
0514* nirL Heme d1 biosynthesis protein 11
0515 Probable transcriptional regulator 9
0516* nirF Heme d1 biosynthesis protein 8
0517* nirC Probablec-type cytochrome precursor 11
0518* nirM Cytochromec551 precursor 12
0519* nirS Nitrate reductase precursor 15
0521 Probable cytochrome c oxidase subunit 6
0523* norC Nitric oxide reductase subunit C 32
0524* norB Nitric oxide reductase subunit B 68
0525* Probable denitrification protein 15
0587 Conserved hypothetical protein 5
0613 Hypothetical protein −5
0614 Hypothetical protein −5
0617 Probable bacteriophage protein −10
0621 Conserved hypothetical protein −5
0622 Probable bacteriophage protein −8
0627 Conserved hypothetical protein −5
0629 Conserved hypothetical protein −7
0631 Hypothetical protein −6
0632 Hypothetical protein −7
0633 Hypothetical protein −8
0635 Hypothetical protein −11
0636 Hypothetical protein −8
0639 Conserved hypothetical protein −9
0641 Probable bacteriophage protein −19
0674 Hypothetical protein 25
0675 Probable sigma-70 factor 5
0713 Hypothetical protein 26
0714 Hypothetical protein 24
0781 Hypothetical protein 18
0782 putA Proline dehydrogenase 8
0865 hpd 4-Hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase 5
0872 phhA Phenylalanine-4-hydroxylase 31
0910 Hypothetical protein −18
0911 Hypothetical protein −6
0921 Hypothetical protein −6
0984 Colicin immunity protein 7
1123 Hypothetical protein 5
1178 oprH Outer membrane protein H1 precursor −17
1179 phoP Two-component response regulator −5
1195 Hypothetical protein 6
1196 Probable transcriptional regulator 5
1382 Probable type II secretion system protein 12
1414 Hypothetical protein 5
1516 Hypothetical protein 5
1537 Probable short-chain dehydrogenase 6
1540 Conserved hypothetical protein 7
1541 Probable drug efflux transporter 8
1552 Probable cytochrome c −12
1553 Probable cytochrome c oxidase subunit −13
1554 Probable cytochrome oxidase subunit −5
1673 Hypothetical protein 5
1742 Probable amidotransferase 7
1746 Hypothetical protein 9
1837 Hypothetical protein −13
1838 cysI Sulfite reductase −10
1871 lasA LasA protease precursor 6
1887 Hypothetical protein 11
1888 Hypothetical protein 10
1892 Hypothetical protein −9
1894 Hypothetical protein −9
1895 Hypothetical protein −10
1896 Hypothetical protein −9
1897 Hypothetical protein −35
1911 Probable transmembrane sensor 6
1912 Probable sigma-70 factor 7
1922 Probable TonB-dependent receptor 11
1924 Hypothetical protein 9
1925 Hypothetical protein 8
1999 Probable CoA transferase, subunit A 35
2000 Probable CoA transferase, subunit B 44
2001 atoB Acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase 13
2003 bdhA 3-Hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase 6
2004 Conserved hypothetical protein 8
2016 Probable transcriptional regulator 5
2114 Probable MFS transporter −7
2202 Probable amino acid permease −7
2204 Probable binding protein component of ABC transporter −10
2223 Hypothetical protein 6
2247 bkdA1 2-Oxoisovalerate dehydrogenase (alpha subunit) 38
2248 BkdA2 2-Oxoisovalerate dehydrogenase (beta subunit) 14
2249 bkdB Branched-chain alpha-keto acid dehydrogenase (lipoamide component) 15
2250 lpdV Lipoamide dehydrogenase (−Val) 9
2466 Probable TonB-dependent receptor 5
2534 Probable transcriptional regulator 5
2567 Hypothetical protein 5
2648 nuoM NADH dehydrogenase I chain −5
2686 pfeR Two-component response regulator 6
2687 pfeS Two-component sensor 5
2753 Hypothetical protein 7
2807 Hypothetical protein −19
2825 Probable transcriptional regulator 5
2826 Probable glutathione peroxidase 5
2929 Hypothetical protein 5
2931 Probable transcriptional regulator 19
2932 morB Morphinone reductase 71
2933 Probable MFS transporter 31
2934 Probable hydrolase 16
2945 Conserved hypothetical protein −6
3038 Probable porin −6
3118 leuB 3-Isopropylmalate dehydrogenase −5
3120 leuD 3-Isopropylmalate dehydratase small subunit −6
3121 leuC 3-Isopropylmalate dehydratase large subunit −6
3126 ibpA Heat shock protein 7
3188 Probable permease of ABC sugar transporter −382
3189 Probable permease of ABC sugar transporter −79
3195 gapA Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase −6
3249 Probable transcriptional regulator 5
3309 Conserved hypothetical protein 6
3313 Hypothetical protein −5
3391* nosR Regulatory protein 54
3392* nosZ Nitrous oxide reductase precursor 25
3393* nosD NosD protein 11
3394* nosF NosF protein 16
3395* nosY NosY protein 8
3396* nosL NosL protein 8
3404 Probable secretion protein 7
3405 hasE Metalloprotease secretion protein 32
3406 hasD Transport protein 16
3415 Probable dihydrolipoamide acetyltransferase 9
3416 Probable pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component, beta chain 36
3417 Probable pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component, alpha subunit 7
3418 ldh Leucine dehydrogenase 8
3441 Probable molybdopterin-binding protein −12
3442 Probable ATP-binding component of ABC transporter −21
3443 Probable permease of ABC transporter −43
3444 Conserved hypothetical protein −161
3445 Conserved hypothetical protein −62
3446 Conserved hypothetical protein −19
3450 Probable antioxidant protein −8
3516 Probable lyase −5
3581 glpF Glycerol uptake facilitator protein 9
3582 glpK Glycerol kinase 6
3584 glpD Glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase 44
3598 Conserved hypothetical protein 7
3600 Conserved hypothetical protein 139
3601 Conserved hypothetical protein 83
3719 Hypothetical protein 21
3720 Hypothetical protein 30
3721 Probable transcriptional regulator 5
3837 Probable permease of ABC transporter −5
3862 Hypothetical protein 6
3870 moaA1 Molybdopterin biosynthetic protein 7
3871 Probable peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase 7
3872* narI Respiratory nitrate reductase gamma chain 9
3873* narJ Respiratory nitrate reductase delta chain 11
3874* narH Respiratory nitrate reductase beta chain 24
3875* narG Respiratory nitrate reductase alpha chain 19
3876* narK2 Nitrite extrusion protein 2 10
3877* narK1 Nitrite extrusion protein 1 6
3914 moeA1 Molybdenum cofactor biosynthetic protein 7
3915 moaB1 Molybdopterin biosynthetic protein 5
3922 Conserved hypothetical protein −6
3931 Conserved hypothetical protein −16
3933 Probable choline transporter 10
3935 tauD Taurine dioxygenase −16
3936 Probable permease of ABC taurine transporter −35
3937 Probable ATP-binding component of ABC taurine transporter −25
3938 Probable periplasmic taurine-binding protein precursor −21
4063 Hypothetical protein 15
4064 Probable ATP-binding component of ABC transporter 7
4065 Hypothetical protein 5
4156 Probable TonB-dependent receptor 10
4160 fepD Ferric enterobactin transport protein 5
4167 Probable oxidoreductase 13
4168 Probable TonB-dependent receptor 17
4181 Hypothetical protein 16
4182 Hypothetical protein 10
4197 Probable two-component sensor 10
4288 Probable transcriptional regulator 8
4333 Probable fumarase −5
4364 Hypothetical protein 113
4365 Probable transporter 54
4442 cysN ATP sulfurylase GTP-binding subunit, APS kinase −22
4443 cysD ATP sulfurylase small subunit −10
4577 Hypothetical protein 5
4588 gdhA Glutamate dehydrogenase −6
4610 Hypothetical protein 9
4621 Probable oxidoreductase 5
4657 Hypothetical protein 5
4738 Conserved hypothetical protein −6
4739 Conserved hypothetical protein −9
4834 Hypothetical protein 18
4835 Hypothetical protein 16
4836 Hypothetical protein 32
4837 Probable outer membrane protein 38
4838 Hypothetical protein 7
5024 Conserved hypothetical protein −13
5027 Hypothetical protein 5
5088 Hypothetical protein 7
5100 hutU Urocanase 7
5102 Hypothetical protein −8
5106 Conserved hypothetical protein 6
5170 arcD Arginine-ornithine antiporter 11
5171 arcA Arginine deiminase 9
5172 arcB Ornithine carbamoyltransferase, catabolic 10
5173 arcC Carbamate kinase 6
5302 dadX Catabolic alanine racemase 6
5303 Conserved hypothetical protein 9
5304 dadA d-Amino acid dehydrogenase, small subunit 9
5351 Rubredoxin −5
5372 betA Choline dehydrogenase 12
5373 betB Betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase 12
5374 betI Transcriptional regulator 11
5427 adhA Alcohol dehydrogenase 6
5446 Hypothetical protein 13
5475 Hypothetical protein 5
5481 Hypothetical protein −7
5482 Hypothetical protein −8
5499 np20 Transcriptional regulator 6
5500 znuC Zinc transport protein 6
5532 Hypothetical protein 8
5534 Hypothetical protein 13
5535 Conserved hypothetical protein 15
5536 Conserved hypothetical protein 52
5538 amiA N-Acetylmuramoyl-l-alanine amidase 28
5539 Hypothetical protein 8
5540 Hypothetical protein 17
5541 Probable dihydroorotase 11
a

From the P. aeruginosa genome website, www.pseudomonas.com. Genes involved in anaerobic metabolism (*), transport and metabolism of amino acids (†), or identified previously using IVET (‡) are listed in bold.

b

Fold change in P. aeruginosa mRNA level when grown in vivo in the DMC compared to that in bacteria grown in glucose minimal medium in vitro. Positive numbers represent induction, and negative numbers indicate repression in the DMC. All genes listed were also >5- fold regulated when DMC-grown and succinate-grown P. aeruginosa cultures were compared.

Iron acquisition in vivo.

Most bacteria require iron for growth, and acquisition of iron is a significant challenge in most in vivo environments where little free iron exists. P. aeruginosa and many other bacteria produce high-affinity iron chelators called siderophores to acquire iron in vivo (7). These extracellular chelators are able to scavenge iron from in vivo sources and deliver it to the bacterium. P. aeruginosa produces two well-studied siderophores, pyoverdine and pyochelin, and the genes important for their syntheses are induced in low-iron environments (7). Ochsner et al. recently reported a transcriptome analysis of P. aeruginosa grown in vitro under low- and high-iron conditions (28). Of the 113 genes which were induced at least fivefold in this study, under low-iron conditions, 82 were also induced at least fivefold in our DMC model (Table 3). Included within these in vivo-induced genes were genes involved in synthesis and binding of pyoverdine and pyochelin, as well as multiple genes important for heme uptake (Table 3). Heme may serve as a source of iron in vivo, and the hasAp gene involved in heme utilization was the most highly induced in vivo gene (over 2,000-fold induction).

TABLE 3.

Expression of P. aeruginosa iron-regulated genes during monoculture and coculture growth in vivo

ORFa Gene Homology or functiona Fold regulationb
In vivo vs in vitro Coculture vs monoculture
0471 Probable transmembrane sensor 7 −17
0472 Probable sigma-70 factor 8 −34
0500 bioB Biotin synthase −9 NC
0672 Hypothetical protein 44 −44
0707 toxR Transcriptional regulator 6 −4
1245 Hypothetical protein 5 −3
1300 Probable sigma-70 factor 35 −37
1301 Probable transmembrane sensor 13 −12
2033 Hypothetical protein 20 −23
2034 Hypothetical protein 20 −16
2384 Hypothetical protein 41 −46
2385 Probable acylase 34 −30
2386 pvdA l-Ornithine N5-oxygenase 85 −74
2389 Conserved hypothetical protein 9 −9
2390 Probable ATP-binding/permease fusion ABC transporter 7 −8
2391 Probable outer membrane protein 5 −7
2392 Hypothetical protein 18 −12
2393 Probable dipeptidase precursor 53 −127
2394 Probable aminotransferase 57 −60
2395 Hypothetical protein 13 −38
2396 Hypothetical protein 13 −7
2397 pvdE Pyoverdine biosynthesis protein 44 −25
2398 fpvA Ferripyoverdine receptor 30 −86
2399 pvdD Pyoverdine synthetase 40 −23
2400 Probable nonribosomal peptide synthetase 94 −28
2401 Probable nonribosomal peptide synthetase 94 −40
2402 Probable nonribosomal peptide synthetase 46 −28
2403 Hypothetical protein 58 −22
2404 Hypothetical protein 43 −39
2405 Hypothetical protein 43 −37
2406 Hypothetical protein 24 −21
2407 Probable adhesion protein 14 −18
2408 Probable ATP-binding component of ABC transporter 38 −11
2411 Probable thioesterase 84 −111
2412 Conserved hypothetical protein 197 −203
2413 Probable class III aminotransferase 51 −136
2424 Probable nonribosomal peptide synthetase 112 −53
2425 Probable thioesterase 44 −51
2426 pvdS Sigma factor 66 −117
2427 Hypothetical protein 14 −8
2451 Hypothetical protein 9 −9
2452 Hypothetical protein 73 −110
2467 Probable transmembrane sensor 5 −8
2468 Probable sigma-70 factor 6 −13
3407 hasAp Heme acquisition protein 2,180 −724
3408 hasR Heme acquisition protein 74 −74
3409 Probable transmembrane sensor 9 −7
3410 Probable sigma-70 factor 14 −18
3530 Conserved hypothetical protein 9 −39
3899 Probable sigma-70 factor 17 −26
3900 Probable transmembrane sensor 7 −11
3901 fecA Fe(III) dicitrate transport protein 9 −10
4158 fepC Ferric enterobactin transport protein 13 −13
4218 Probable transporter 40 −22
4219 Hypothetical protein 109 −66
4220 Hypothetical protein 288 −48
4221 fptA Fe(III) pyochelin receptor precursor 81 −92
4222 Probable ATP-binding component of ABC transporter 34 −13
4223 Probable ATP-binding component of ABC transporter 26 −15
4224 Hypothetical protein 58 −34
4225 pchF Pyochelin synthetase 52 −65
4226 pchE Dihydroaeruginoic acid synthetase 53 −46
4227 pchR Transcriptional regulator 21 −76
4228 pchD Pyochelin biosynthesis protein 74 −66
4229 pchC Pyochelin biosynthesis protein 99 −163
4230 pchB Salicylate biosynthesis protein 126 −118
4231 pchA Salicylate biosynthesis isochorismate synthetase 122 −89
4359 Conserved hypothetical protein 5 −10
4467 Hypothetical protein 21 −10
4468 sodM Superoxide dismutase 40 −48>
4469 Hypothetical protein 48 −53
4470 fumC1 Fumarate hydratase 60 −106
4471 Hypothetical protein 100 −131
4570 Hypothetical protein 37 −25
4708 Hypothetical protein 9 −6
4709 Probable hemin degrading factor 9 −8
4710 Probable outer membrane hemin receptor 19 −30
4895 Probable transmembrane sensor 12 −13
4896 Probable sigma-70 factor 14 −25
4973 thiC Thiamin biosynthesis protein −14 NC
5312 Probable aldehyde dehydrogenase 6 NC
5313 Probable pyridoxal-dependent aminotransferase 7 NC
a

From the P. aeruginosa genome website, www.pseudomonas.com.

b

Regulation of P. aeruginosa iron-regulated genes (28) as determined by Affymetrix GeneChip analysis. Two conditions were compared: monoculture growth in vivo versus monoculture in vitro growth in glucose minimal medium with added FeSO4 (positive numbers represent induction in vivo); and in vivo coculture growth versus in vivo monoculture growth (positive numbers represent induction during coculture growth). NC, no change.

Oxygen levels in the peritoneum.

P. aeruginosa grows anaerobically by using nitrate and its reduced derivatives as terminal electron acceptors. If nitrate is not present, arginine may be metabolized fermentatively by P. aeruginosa (38). The genes encoding proteins critical for anaerobic nitrate and arginine metabolism are positively regulated under low-oxygen conditions (34). An examination of our in vivo GeneChip data indicates that several P. aeruginosa operons involved in utilization of nitrate, nitrite, nitric oxide, nitrous oxide, and arginine were highly up-regulated during in vivo growth compared to aerobic glucose-grown cells (Table 2). Thus, we hypothesize that P. aeruginosa would possess the enzymatic capabilities of anaerobically grown bacteria, including the ability to reduce nitrate via the nitrate reductase enzyme. An evaluation of the nitrate reductase activity of in vivo-grown P. aeruginosa revealed that in vivo-grown P. aeruginosa was capable of reducing exogenously added nitrate to levels below detection (data not shown).

P. aeruginosa physiology and metabolism in vivo.

To cause more than a transient infection, P. aeruginosa must survive and grow within the host environment. However, the growth environment within the host is not well understood, other than the observation that P. aeruginosa mutants unable to synthesize purine precursors grow poorly in mouse models (40). Thus, it is critical to understand the growth environment of P. aeruginosa in vivo. Our in vitro conditions required P. aeruginosa to metabolize glucose or succinate as the sole carbon source and synthesize all essential metabolic precursors de novo. Under these in vitro conditions as our GeneChip control, our data indicate that genes encoding proteins involved in transport and metabolism of amino acids, particularly aromatic (PA0865 and PA0872) and branched-chain (PA2247 to PA2250) amino acids, are highly induced during growth in the DMC (Table 2). These data suggest that P. aeruginosa is using amino acids as a carbon source in the peritoneum.

Growth of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus cocultures in vitro and in vivo.

It is clear that a number of bacterial infections are not simply the result of colonization by one microorganism, but of the pathogenic contributions of several organisms (13, 46). Such is the case with chronic lung infections and peritoneal infections in patients undergoing dialysis, where multispecies consortia, often including P. aeruginosa and S. aureus (10, 19, 20, 22, 46), are associated with disease. Although these bacteria may reside in the same pathogenic environment, essentially nothing is known about if or how they interact in vivo. To begin to understand the interactions between P. aeruginosa and S. aureus in vivo, these bacteria were grown in monoculture and in coculture in the DMC model. When grown in monoculture, S. aureus possesses a faster doubling time than P. aeruginosa in the DMC (30 min for S. aureus versus 50 min for P. aeruginosa). When P. aeruginosa and S. aureus are started at identical densities and grown in the DMC model, P. aeruginosa grows similar to that under monoculture conditions, reaching densities of 5 × 108 bacteria/ml after 15 to 18 h. S. aureus reaches slightly lower growth yields at this time during coculture in the DMC (4 × 109 bacteria/ml) compared to monoculture growth (1010 bacteria/ml).

Gene expression of P. aeruginosa cocultured in vivo with S. aureus.

To determine the impact of S. aureus on P. aeruginosa physiology during growth in the peritoneum, we isolated RNA from P. aeruginosa grown in vivo with S. aureus. As mentioned above, P. aeruginosa reaches similar densities after 15 to 18 h in the DMC when growing as a monoculture or in coculture with S. aureus; thus, we sampled bacteria for RNA isolation at these time points under both conditions. To enrich for P. aeruginosa RNA during isolation, S. aureus lysis was prevented by omitting the lysozyme-lysostaphin treatment. If any contaminating S. aureus RNA were present, it would likely not cross-hybridize because of the significant differences in the GC content of these bacteria and the built-in mismatch controls on the Affymetrix GeneChips.

We compared the transcriptomes of P. aeruginosa grown in vivo in monoculture to those of P. aeruginosa grown in coculture with S. aureus in vivo. A total of 178 genes were differentially expressed at least fivefold during in vivo growth with S. aureus, with the majority of these genes (131) repressed in the coculture situation. One of the most striking features of these data is the fact that over 95% (78 of 82) of the genes repressed during in vivo growth with S. aureus are regulated by iron availability (Table 3). This includes genes involved in pyoverdine and pyochelin biosynthesis and suggests that P. aeruginosa growing in coculture with S. aureus perceives its environment as high in iron, in contrast to the monoculture in vivo situation, where the perceived environment is low in iron (Table 3). In fact, no differences in iron-regulated genes were observed when the transcriptomes of high-iron, in vitro-grown P. aeruginosa were compared to those of P. aeruginosa grown in vivo with S. aureus (data not shown). This suggests that the presence of S. aureus must locally concentrate useful iron for P. aeruginosa or increase the concentration of free iron in the peritoneum. The former is likely, since the molecular weight exclusion of the dialysis membranes prevents diffusion of most S. aureus toxins and most in vivo iron is chelated by transferrin or lactoferrin.

Lysis of S. aureus is required for iron acquisition.

Given the observation that P. aeruginosa lyses several bacteria, including S. aureus (11, 17, 26), we hypothesized that the increased iron levels perceived by P. aeruginosa during in vivo coculture may be partially explained by S. aureus lysis and subsequent release of intracellular iron. To test this hypothesis, we cocultured S. aureus in vivo with P. aeruginosa PA14 and P. aeruginosa PA14-LM1, which contains a Tn5 insertion in pqsA and exhibits reduced lysis of S. aureus (Fig. 2A). The pqsA gene is involved in biosynthesis of several quinolone molecules in P. aeruginosa important for cell-cell signaling and lysis of S. aureus but possesses no known involvement in regulation of low-iron-inducible genes (data not shown). We used the low-iron-inducible gene pvdS as a marker gene for iron limitation and evaluated transcript levels of pvdS in these cocultures using RT-PCR. As expected from our GeneChip data, the wild-type PA14 perceives the in vivo environment as high in iron when cocultured with S. aureus (low levels of pvdS transcript), while PA14-LM1 perceives its environment as low in iron (high levels of pvdS mRNA) in coculture (Fig. 2B).

P. aeruginosa can use S. aureus as an iron source.

These data suggest that P. aeruginosa can use S. aureus as an iron source. If this were true, P. aeruginosa should grow to higher densities in iron-limited media when grown in coculture with S. aureus or when grown in the presence of lysed S. aureus cells. To test this hypothesis, we grew P. aeruginosa PA14 in iron-replete medium in vitro as a monoculture, as a monoculture in the presence of mechanically lysed S. aureus, and in coculture with viable S. aureus. Final P. aeruginosa growth yields showed that the wild-type strain grew to higher densities when grown in coculture with S. aureus or in the presence of S. aureus lysate (Fig. 3), indicating that viable and lysed S. aureus can be used as a source of iron by wild-type P. aeruginosa. To assess if lysis is required for acquisition of iron from viable S. aureus cells, we grew P. aeruginosa PA14-LM1 in the presence and absence of viable and lysed S. aureus (Fig. 3). Growth of PA14-LM1 in the presence of lysed S. aureus greatly increased the growth yields over monoculture growth, indicating that this mutant can use lysed S. aureus as an iron source. However, significantly increased growth yields were not observed for PA14-LM1 when cocultured with viable S. aureus, suggesting that the inability of PA14-LM1 to effectively lyse S. aureus impairs its growth under low-iron coculture conditions.

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Growth yields of wild-type P. aeruginosa and P. aeruginosa PA14-LM1 grown in iron-limited MOPS minimal medium (see Materials and Methods) as a monoculture, with 10 μM FeSO4, in coculture with S. aureus, and with the addition of mechanically lysed S. aureus. Data are expressed as (the ratio of P. aeruginosa cell yield in the presence of the addition)/(monoculture cell yields with no addition) (numbers >1 indicate increased cell yield during growth with the indicated addition). For the two no-addition controls, the ratio was calculated by pair-wise comparisons of four individual replicates. S. aureus does not grow in this minimal medium due to amino acid auxotrophy. Less than 103 S. aureus cells were present in PA14-S. aureus coculture colonies at the time of sampling, while >109 remained in the PA14-LM1-S. aureus cocultures. Error bars represent the standard deviation for three to four experimental repeats.

DISCUSSION

The goal of this study was to examine gene expression of P. aeruginosa during in vivo growth in order to better understand the physiology of this bacterium during infection. We used a rat DMC model in conjunction with DNA microarrays to identify P. aeruginosa genes differentially regulated during growth in vivo as a monoculture and in coculture with S. aureus. This model involves growing P. aeruginosa in a dialysis bag implanted in the peritoneum of the rat. The DMC model does not allow direct interactions with host molecules larger than 8 kDa, including host cells; thus, genes differentially regulated by such interactions will not be detected. However, this model makes microarray and proteomic approaches viable and is easily manipulated to observe interactions between bacteria in an in vivo growth environment. P. aeruginosa grows well in the DMC, with a doubling time of less than 1 h and reaching final bacterial densities of over 1010 bacteria, illustrating that the peritoneum is a high-nutrient growth environment.

To identify in vivo-specific genes, we compared the transcriptome of in vivo-grown P. aeruginosa to bacteria grown in vitro in MOPS minimal medium with glucose or succinate as the sole source of carbon and energy. These carbon sources were chosen for comparison since most P. aeruginosa metabolic studies have focused on growth using these substrates. By comparing our in vivo transcriptome results to two in vitro growth conditions, we were able to decrease the number of in vivo-regulated genes by 30 to 40% compared to single in vitro growth conditions. We believe this analysis effectively eliminated many carbon source-specific genes from our analysis. It should be noted that both of our in vitro growth conditions require P. aeruginosa to synthesize all anabolic precursors de novo, thus allowing us to make predictions about the nutritional environment of the peritoneum. Our data indicate that amino acids are likely a substrate for growth in the peritoneum, since genes involved in catabolism and transport of branched-chain and aromatic amino acids are induced during growth in the DMC (Table 2). Although further studies are necessary to determine the specific growth substrates, we feel the DMC model provides an easily manipulatable preliminary model for these studies. Metabolic genes identified as important for growth in the DMC can then be tested in more relevant animal systems.

Our transcriptome analysis of in vivo monocultures did not show activation of most of the P. aeruginosa genes identified by Wang et al. as in vivo-induced by IVET (Tables 2 and 3). There are a number of reasons to account for this difference, the most obvious being the differences in the mouse models used. Wang et al. used a neutropenic mouse model and harvested bacteria from the mouse liver, whereas our peritoneal model is a much simpler in vivo batch growth model. Our study also used glucose- or succinate-grown P. aeruginosa as an in vitro control, whereas Wang et al. used a common complex medium for IVET library construction. Regardless of the differences in the studies, it is an important observation that three genes were common between the studies. Of these three genes, much is known about the FptA pyochelin receptor, which is important for iron acquisition in low-iron environments. Much less is known about np20, other than it is induced in vivo and is important for production of the extracellular virulence factor pyocyanin, and nothing is known about the third gene (PA4115), which was only induced threefold during growth in the peritoneum. Our data in combination with the previous IVET analysis indicate that these three genes are members of a core set of genes inducible during in vivo growth in at least two disparate animal models. The np20 gene is the most intriguing, given its homology with a number of transcriptional regulators. Further study of these genes should provide clues to the in vivo environment and potentially identify processes important for in vivo growth and pathogenesis.

Our transcriptome analysis of in vivo P. aeruginosa monocultures revealed that the peritoneal environment is low in iron (Table 3). These data are not surprising and coincide with a number of studies evaluating bacterial growth in vivo (21, 24, 40). It is interesting that the in vitro response of P. aeruginosa to low iron reported by Ochsner et al. (28) is remarkably similar to our in vivo results, indicating that in vitro studies evaluating the response to low iron are applicable to understanding in vivo growth and pathogenesis. It should be noted that although our data indicate that the peritoneal environment is low in free iron, we do not believe that iron is severely limiting growth, since P. aeruginosa grows near its maximum doubling rate in the rat (50-min doubling time). Thus, it appears that although low in free iron, as expected P. aeruginosa is well adapted to growth in the peritoneum.

Our transcriptome data also indicate that the peritoneum is low in oxygen, since many genes known to be regulated by anaerobiosis were highly induced during growth in vivo (Table 2). Based on the fast growth rate of P. aeruginosa in the DMC, it is likely that sufficient levels of oxygen and/or nitrate are available in the peritoneum for growth, since the maximum doubling time anaerobically in vitro using arginine is approximately 5 h (data not shown). Nitrate is present within the peritoneum, as we detected low micromolar levels of nitrate from an uninoculated DMC chamber (data not shown). Anaerobic growth in the peritoneum is relevant to pathogenesis, given the recent evidence that the ability of P. aeruginosa to form antibiotic-resistant biofilms is enhanced in low-oxygen environments (18). Many P. aeruginosa infections, including those in the CF lung and in the peritoneum, are a consequence of biofilm formation (8, 9, 18). The observation that P. aeruginosa growing in the peritoneum perceives its environment as low in oxygen enhances the importance of this model to pathogenic studies, including biofilm studies. Although in this study we focused on planktonic bacteria, we have preliminary evidence that P. aeruginosa readily forms antibiotic-resistant biofilms on catheter tubing placed in the DMC (data not shown).

The most interesting observation from this study is that wild-type P. aeruginosa perceives its environment as high in iron when grown with S. aureus in the DMC. Our data suggest that the change in iron perception by P. aeruginosa during coculture with S. aureus is dependent on lysis of S. aureus, since P. aeruginosa PA14-LM1, which is unaffected in iron acquisition or growth in vivo but cannot effectively lyse S. aureus (Fig. 2A), perceives its environment as low in iron during coculture growth with S. aureus (Fig. 2B). This would not be surprising, since P. aeruginosa produces several extracellular antimicrobial molecules (many controlled by the pqsA-E operon) known to be important for lysis of S. aureus (11, 17, 26, 27). The DMC coculture experiments were also supported by in vitro data, which showed that growth yields of P. aeruginosa were increased in iron-limited media when grown in coculture with S. aureus (Fig. 3). This again was dependent on lysis of S. aureus, since growth yields of PA14-LM1 were not increased in coculture. This deficiency in growth by PA14-LM1 cannot be explained by competition with S. aureus for iron, since S. aureus is auxotrophic and will not grow in the minimal succinate medium used in these experiments. We believe these data together suggest that P. aeruginosa lyses S. aureus and can use it as an iron source.

S. aureus is capable of undergoing autolysis during in vitro growth (5, 6, 15, 16). Our data do not distinguish whether P. aeruginosa is causing direct lysis of S. aureus or inducing autolysis; however, our results with P. aeruginosa PA14-LM1 indicate that P. aeruginosa-independent autolysis by S. aureus is most likely not the primary mechanism of iron acquisition during coculture. We are currently dissecting the specific mechanism(s) of S. aureus lysis, and our preliminary work and the work of others indicate that it is most likely multifactorial (11, 26). Lysis of S. aureus by P. aeruginosa is not unique to the laboratory strains used in this study. Our laboratory P. aeruginosa strain exhibited visible lysis of seven S. aureus strains tested, and 24 of 29 (83%) P. aeruginosa CF lung isolates tested produced visible lysis of our laboratory S. aureus strain (data not shown).

Although lysis appears to be important for iron acquisition during coculture in vitro and in vivo, the source of the iron is unknown. Our experiments indicate that P. aeruginosa can use mechanically lysed S. aureus as a source of iron, and it is likely that iron-containing proteins released from the lysed S. aureus cells serve as the source of iron. The DMC dialysis membrane will prevent diffusion of proteins larger than 8,000 Da, which may act to concentrate iron-containing proteins; thus, we cannot be certain whether iron acquisition through S. aureus lysis is important for P. aeruginosa in vivo. However, it is clear that the physiology of P. aeruginosa with regard to iron availability is dramatically altered during coculture growth with S. aureus in the DMC. Iron acquisition through siderophore biosynthesis and response is an energy-intensive process; thus, increasing local iron levels through lysis of S. aureus during growth in low-iron environments, such as those encountered in vivo, might be beneficial. We do not believe our data are limited to P. aeruginosa-S. aureus interactions. P. aeruginosa also lyses several other gram-positive pathogens, including S. pneumoniae and Bacillus anthracis (data not shown), which it may also encounter during infection.

Although we have shown that P. aeruginosa may obtain iron through lysis of S. aureus, our results do not preclude other mechanisms of iron acquisition during coculture. P. aeruginosa may also obtain iron by binding and uptake of siderophores produced by other bacteria. A recent study of cocultures of P. aeruginosa and Burkholderia cepacia indicated that P. aeruginosa specifically responds to the presence of B. cepacia siderophores during coculture (41). It is likely that the mechanistic details of iron acquisition will vary depending on the constituents of the coculture, but our results indicate that antagonistic interactions between species may help define community structure. Spatial and temporal factors will also affect these interactions, and it is likely that P. aeruginosa iron acquisition through S. aureus lysis will only be important when these bacteria are in very close proximity, such as in multispecies biofilms.

Our transcriptome analysis provides a more comprehensive view of in vivo gene expression of P. aeruginosa. Our data suggest that the peritoneum is a low-oxygen, iron-limited environment with sufficient nutrients to support large numbers of P. aeruginosa. Our studies verified three previously described in vivo-induced P. aeruginosa genes and identified a large number of other genes differentially expressed during growth in the peritoneum. Our data also provide a genomic analysis of a common pathogenic coculture and indicate that the physiology of P. aeruginosa in vivo is drastically altered in regards to iron availability during coculture with S. aureus. These results may have significant ramifications for in vivo growth of P. aeruginosa in polymicrobial communities and underscore the need for analysis of multispecies infections. Although we focused on iron acquisition in this study, it is plausible that other nutrients or cofactors may be obtained through competitive interactions. It is likely that the benefits of such interactions are not confined to pathogenesis but instead reflect processes important for survival and growth in many polymicrobial environments.

Acknowledgments

We thank the MGH-Parabiosys: NHLBI Program for Genomic Applications, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass. (http://pga.mgh.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/pa14/mutants/retrieve.cgi) for the pqsA mutant and S. Jin for IVET sequences.

This work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (1P20RR15564-01 to D.R.A. and M.W.).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Akins, D. R., K. W. Bourell, M. J. Caimano, M. V. Norgard, and J. D. Radolf. 1998. A new animal model for studying Lyme disease spirochetes in a mammalian host-adapted state. J. Clin. Investig. 101:2240-2250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ankenbauer, R. G., and H. N. Quan. 1994. FptA, the Fe(III)-pyochelin receptor of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a phenolate siderophore receptor homologous to hydroxamate siderophore receptors. J. Bacteriol. 176:307-319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Boyce, J. D., I. Wilkie, M. Harper, M. L. Paustian, V. Kapur, and B. Adler. 2002. Genomic scale analysis of Pasteurella multocida gene expression during growth within the natural chicken host. Infect. Immun. 70:6871-6879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brooks, C. S., P. S. Hefty, S. E. Jolliff, and D. R. Akins. 2003. Global analysis of Borrelia burgdorferi genes regulated by mammalian host-specific signals. Infect. Immun. 71:3371-3383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Brunskill, E. W., and K. W. Bayles. 1996. Identification and molecular characterization of a putative regulatory locus that affects autolysis in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 178:611-618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Brunskill, E. W., B. L. de Jonge, and K. W. Bayles. 1997. The Staphylococcus aureus scdA gene: a novel locus that affects cell division and morphogenesis. Microbiol. 143:2877-2882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Budzikiewicz, H. 2001. Siderophores of the human pathogenic fluorescent pseudomonads. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 1:1-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Costerton, J. W., Z. Lewandowski, D. E. Caldwell, D. R. Korber, and H. M. Lappin-Scott. 1995. Microbial biofilms. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 49:711-745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Costerton, J. W., P. S. Stewart, and E. P. Greenberg. 1999. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science 284:1318-1322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. 1999. Cystic fibrosis patient registry annual data report. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, Bethesda, Md.
  • 11.Deziel, E., F. Lepine, S. Milot, J. He, M. N. Mindrinos, R. G. Tompkins, and L. G. Rahme. 2004. Analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa 4-hydroxy-2-alkylquinolines (HAQs) reveals a role for 4-hydroxy-2-heptylquinoline in cell-to-cell communication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:1339-1344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dodds, M. G., K. J. Grobe, and P. S. Stewart. 2000. Modeling biofilm antimicrobial resistance. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 68:456-465. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Domann, E., G. Hong, C. Imirzalioglu, S. Turschner, J. Kuhle, C. Watzel, T. Hain, H. Hossain, and T. Chakraborty. 2003. Culture-independent identification of pathogenic bacteria and polymicrobial infections in the genitourinary tract of renal transplant recipients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:5500-5510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Findon, G., and T. Miller. 1995. Bacterial peritonitis in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: effect of dialysis on host defense mechanisms. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 26:765-773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fujimoto, D. F., and K. W. Bayles. 1998. Opposing roles of the Staphylococcus aureus virulence regulators, Agr and Sar, in Triton X-100- and penicillin-induced autolysis. J. Bacteriol. 180:3724-3726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Groicher, K. H., B. A. Firek, D. F. Fujimoto, and K. W. Bayles. 2000. The Staphylococcus aureus lrgAB operon modulates murein hydrolase activity and penicillin tolerance. J. Bacteriol. 182:1794-1801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Haba, E., A. Pinazo, O. Jauregui, M. J. Espuny, M. R. Infante, and A. Manresa. 2003. Physicochemical characterization and antimicrobial properties of rhamnolipids produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa 47T2 NCBIM 40044. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 81:316-322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hassett, D. J. , J. Cuppoletti, B. Trapnell, S. V. Lymar, J. J. Rowe, S. S. Yoon, G. M. Hilliard, K. Parvatiyar, M. C. Kamani, D. J. Wozniak, S. H. Hwang, T. R. McDermott, and U. A. Ochsner. 2002. Anaerobic metabolism and quorum sensing by Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms in chronically infected cystic fibrosis airways: rethinking antibiotic treatment strategies and drug targets. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 54:1425-1443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hoiby, N. 1998. Pseudomonas in cystic fibrosis: past, present, and future. Cystic Fibrosis Trust, Kent, United Kingdom.
  • 20.Holley, J. L., J. Bernardini, and B. Piraino. 1992. Polymicrobial peritonitis in patients on continuous peritoneal dialysis. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 19:162-166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Janakiraman, A., and J. M. Slauch. 2000. The putative iron transport system SitABCD encoded on SPI1 is required for full virulence of Salmonella typhimurium. Mol. Microbiol. 35:1146-1155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kiernan, L., F. O. Finkelstein, A. S. Kliger, N. Gorban-Brennan, P. Juergensen, A. Mooraki, and E. Brown. 1995. Outcome of polymicrobial peritonitis in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 25:461-464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kolak, M., F. Karpati, H. J. Monstein, and J. Jonasson. 2003. Molecular typing of the bacterial flora in sputum of cystic fibrosis patients. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 293:309-317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kosorok, M. R., L. Zeng, S. E. West, M. J. Rock, M. L. Splaingard, A. Laxova, C. G. Green, J. Collins, and P. M. Farrell. 2001. Acceleration of lung disease in children with cystic fibrosis after Pseudomonas aeruginosa acquisition. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 32:277-287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lo, C. Y., W. L. Chu, K. M. Wan, S. Y. Ng, W. L. Lee, M. F. Chu, S. W. Cheng, and W. K. Lo. 1998. Pseudomonas exit-site infections in CAPD patients: evolution and outcome of treatment. Perit. Dial. Int. 18:637-640. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Machan, Z. A., G. W. Taylor, T. L. Pitt, P. J. Cole, and R. Wilson. 1992. 2-Heptyl-4-hydroxyquinoline N-oxide, an antistaphylococcal agent produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 30:615-623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Morse, S. A., B. V. Jones, and P. G. Lysko. 1980. Pyocin inhibition of Neisseria gonorrhoeae: mechanism of action. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 18:416-423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ochsner, U. A., P. J. Wilderman, A. I. Vasil, and M. L. Vasil. 2002. GeneChip expression analysis of the iron starvation response in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: identification of novel pyoverdine biosynthesis genes. Mol. Microbiol. 45:1277-1287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Pedersen, S. S., G. H. Shand, B. L. Hansen, and G. N. Hansen. 1990. Induction of experimental chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infection with P. aeruginosa entrapped in alginate microspheres. APMIS 98:203-211. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rahme, L. G., E. J. Stevens, S. F. Wolfort, J. Shao, R. G. Tompkins, and F. M. Ausubel. 1995. Common virulence factors for bacterial pathogenicity in plants and animals. Science 268:1899-1902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ramsey, M. M., and M. Whiteley. 2004. Pseudomonas aeruginosa attachment and biofilm development in dynamic environments. Mol. Microbiol. 53:1075-1088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Raymond, C. K., E. H. Sims, A. Kas, D. H. Spencer, T. V. Kutyavin, R. G. Ivey, Y. Zhou, R. Kaul, J. B. Clendenning, and M. V. Olson. 2002. Genetic variation at the O-antigen biosynthetic locus in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 184:3614-3622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Revel, A. T., A. M. Talaat, and M. V. Norgard. 2002. DNA microarray analysis of differential gene expression in Borrelia burgdorferi, the Lyme disease spirochete. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:1562-1567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sawers, R. G. 1991. Identification and molecular characterization of a transcriptional regulator from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 exhibiting structural and functional similarity to the FNR protein of Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 5:1469-1481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Schlievert, P. M., and D. A. Blomster. 1983. Production of staphylococcal pyrogenic exotoxin type C: influence of physical and chemical factors. J. Infect. Dis. 147:236-242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Schuster, M., C. P. Lostroh, T. Ogi, and E. P. Greenberg. 2003. Identification, timing, and signal specificity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-controlled genes: a transcriptome analysis. J. Bacteriol. 185:2066-2079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Stover, C. K., X. Q. Pham, A. L. Erwin, S. D. Mizoguchi, P. Warrener, M. J. Hickey, F. S. Brinkman, W. O. Hufnagle, D. J. Kowalik, M. Lagrou, R. L. Garber, L. Goltry, E. Tolentino, S. Westbrock-Wadman, Y. Yuan, L. L. Brody, S. N. Coulter, K. R. Folger, A. Kas, K. Larbig, R. Lim, K. Smith, D. Spencer, G. K. Wong, Z. Wu, and I. T. Paulsen. 2000. Complete genome sequence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA01, an opportunistic pathogen. Nature 406:959-964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Vander Wauven, C., A. Pierard, M. Kley-Raymann, and D. Haas. 1984. Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutants affected in anaerobic growth on arginine: evidence for a four-gene cluster encoding the arginine deiminase pathway. J. Bacteriol. 160:928-934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wang, J. , S. Lory, R. Ramphal, and S. Jin. 1996. Isolation and characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa genes inducible by respiratory mucus derived from cystic fibrosis patients. Mol. Microbiol. 22:1005-1012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wang, J. , A. Mushegian, S. Lory, and S. Jin. 1996. Large-scale isolation of candidate virulence genes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by in vivo selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:10434-10439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Weaver, V. B., and R. Kolter. 2004. Burkholderia spp. alter Pseudomonas aeruginosa physiology through iron sequestration. J. Bacteriol. 186:2376-2384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wolfgang, M. C., J. Jyot, A. L. Goodman, R. Ramphal, and S. Lory. 2004. Pseudomonas aeruginosa regulates flagellin expression as part of a global response to airway fluid from cystic fibrosis patients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:6664-6668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Yanagihara, K., K. Tomono, Y. Imamura, Y. Kaneko, M. Kuroki, T. Sawai, Y. Miyazaki, Y. Hirakata, H. Mukae, J. Kadota, and S. Kohno. 2002. Effect of clarithromycin on chronic respiratory infection caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa with biofilm formation in an experimental murine model. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 49:867-870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yanagihara, K., K. Tomono, T. Sawai, Y. Hirakata, J. Kadota, H. Koga, T. Tashiro, and S. Kohno. 1997. Effect of clarithromycin on lymphocytes in chronic respiratory Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 155:337-342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Yanagihara, K., K. Tomono, T. Sawai, M. Kuroki, Y. Kaneko, H. Ohno, Y. Higashiyama, Y. Miyazaki, Y. Hirakata, S. Maesaki, J. Kadota, T. Tashiro, and S. Kohno. 2000. Combination therapy for chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa respiratory infection associated with biofilm formation. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 46:69-72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Yinnon, A. M., D. Gabay, D. Raveh, Y. Schlesinger, I. Slotki, D. Attias, and B. Rudensky. 1999. Comparison of peritoneal fluid culture results from adults and children undergoing CAPD. Perit. Dial. Int. 19:51-55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES