Skip to main content
International Journal of Physiology, Pathophysiology and Pharmacology logoLink to International Journal of Physiology, Pathophysiology and Pharmacology
. 2017 Apr 15;9(2):28–34.

Effects of low-dose acetazolamide on exercise performance in simulated altitude

Ernst Elisabeth 1, Gatterer Hannes 1, Burtscher Johannes 2, Faulhaber Martin 1, Pocecco Elena 1, Burtscher Martin 1
PMCID: PMC5435670  PMID: 28533889

Abstract

Preventive effects of acetazolamide (ACZ) on acute mountain sickness (AMS) are well established but effects on exercise performance at high altitude or in hypoxia have been less considered and are still inconsistent. We hypothesized that low-dose ACZ would not impair exercise performance at simulated high altitude. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the interaction between low-dose ACZ and exercise performance in normobaric hypoxia. Sixteen subjects (8 males and 8 females) were randomly assigned either to receive low-dose ACZ (3×125 mg in 36 hours) or placebo. Incremental cycle spiro-ergometry was performed before and after drug treatment in normobaric hypoxia (inspired fraction of oxygen, FiO2 = 13.5%; equivalent to about 4000 m). Whereas maximal power output and submaximal exercise responses did not change differently from pre- to post-treatment between ACZ and placebo, absolute and relative VO2max values and maximal oxygen pulse were slightly decreased in hypoxia after ACZ pre-treatment. ANOVA results suggest that aerobic capacity in males might be more affected by ACZ pre-treatment than in females. In conclusion, the presented findings may be of practical importance, possibly more meaningful for female mountaineers, because low-dose ACZ (125 mg bd) was shown to prevent AMS development with similar effectiveness as higher doses. This means that low-dose ACZ would prevent both, AMS development and a pronounced reduction in exercise performance.

Keywords: Acetazolamide, hypoxia, exercise performance, sex

Introduction

A gradual ascent to high altitude represents the most promising strategy for optimal acclimatization [1]. However, in certain cases, i.e. inevitable rapid ascent or considerable susceptibility to develop high altitude illness, acetazolamide (ACZ) is the drug of choice for prevention [2,3]. The ACZ dose used for prevention has been discussed inconsistently ranging between 250 mg and 1 g per day [2,4-6]. For instance, Kayser and colleagues demonstrated that rising daily doses from 250 to 500 and 750 mg resulted in increasing reduction of acute mountain sickness (AMS) by 45, 50 and 55% [7]. ACZ acts via inhibition of carbonic anhydrase (CA), an enzyme located particularly in erythrocytes, pulmonary tissues, the brain and the kidneys [3]. The CA inhibition in the proximal renal tubuli induces diuresis by depressing the proximal tubular bicarbonate reabsorption and the distal tubular H+ secretion resulting in metabolic acidosis, hyperventilation and improved arterial partial pressure of oxygen [3,8-11]. Whereas the preventive effects of ACZ on AMS are well established, effects on exercise performance at high altitude or in hypoxia have been less considered and are still conflicting. Some studies report impaired performance with ACZ [12-16], and others found no or even beneficial effects [17-20]. It seems likely that higher ACZ doses are more effective in preventing AMS but cause more adverse effects likely including impairment of exercise performance. However, even low ACZ doses (125 mg bd) can effectively prevent AMS [3], but data regarding its effects on exercise performance are lacking. We hypothesized that low-dose ACZ would not impair exercise performance when acutely exposed to simulated high altitude. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the interaction between low-dose ACZ and exercise performance in normobaric hypoxia.

Methods

Subjects

Sixteen voluntary young and healthy subjects (8 men and 8 women; age 26.7±2.3 years) not acclimatized to altitude above 1000 m were recruited. Exclusion criteria were any acute or chronic illness or known susceptibility to severe AMS. Both, purely sedentary subjects or competitive athletes have been excluded. The study has been approved by the local Ethics Committee. All subjects provided written informed consent prior to their participation.

Study design and protocol

This randomized controlled double-blind study was conducted at the Department of Sport Science, Medical Section, of the University of Innsbruck, Austria. After gender stratification subjects were randomly assigned either to receive low-dose ACZ (ACZ group; n = 8; 4 males and 4 females) or the control group receiving placebo (CG; n = 8; 4 males and 4 females). After clinical routine examination followed by a 30 min rest, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (pre) was performed in normobaric hypoxia (simulated altitude of about 4000 m; inspired fraction of oxygen, FiO2 = 13.5%). About 6 hours later participants started with ACZ intake (3×125 mg within 36 hours) and the control group took placebos (identical in appearance) during the same time period. 48 hours after the first exercise test the same test was repeated in simulated altitude (post). Subjects were advised not to perform intense physical activity at least 2 days before the first exercise test as well as during ACZ and placebo treatment, not to have a heavy meal at least 2 hours before exercise testing but were free to drink ad libitum.

Baseline characteristics

Physical routine examination and the recording of medical history, physical activity, smoking and dietary habits were followed by the assessment of anthropometric data (body mass, height), resting heart rate, systemic blood pressure, ECG, oxygen saturation (SpO2), lung function (FEVC, FEV1), red (haemoglobin, haematocrit) and white blood cell counts (Table 1).

Table 1.

Physiological measurements pre- and post-drug intake in normoxia

ACZ group (n = 8) CG (n = 8) ANOVA time x treatment ANOVA* time x treatment x gender

Pre Post Pre Post
Body mass and resting cardiorespiratory parameters
    Body mass [kg] 66.6±10.9 66.0±11.0 67.9±10.8 67.8±10.5 n.s. n.s.
    HRrest [b/min] 77.9±13.0 77.4±11.9 66.4±13.9 72.5±11.6 n.s. n.s.
    BPsysRest [mmHg] 137.6±15.4 130.6±14.9 141.9±16.9 129.5±19.8 n.s. n.s.
    BPdiaRest [mmHg] 83.1±11.2 83.1±6.1 86.8±9.1 81.9±8.9 n.s. n.s.
    SpO2 [%] 97.6±0.7 97.5±0.9 97.5±0.5 97.4±0.7 n.s. n.s.
Haematological parameters
    Erythrocytes [106/µl] 5.2±1.2 4.9±0.5 4.7±0.5 4.7±0.4 n.s. n.s.
    Leukocytes [103/µl] 7.6±2.7 7.4±2.5 5.3±1.2 5.6±1.3 n.s. n.s.
    Hematocrit [%] 46.2±7.3 48.2±4.7 46.6±4.6 45.1±4.8 .08 n.s.
    Haemoglobin [g/dl] 14.6±1.2 14.9±1.7 14.0±1.1 13.7±1.1 n.s. n.s.
Pulmonary function testing
    FEVC [l] 5.3±1.0 5.5±0.9 5.3±1.0 5.5±1.0 n.s. n.s.
    FEV1 [l] 4.3±0.7 4.5±0.7 4.2±0.8 4.3±0.8 n.s. n.s.

Data are mean values ± SD. P-values in italics indicate a trend toward significance (< 0.1 but > 0.05).

*

mixed design ANOVA has been used.

ACZ, acetazolamide; CG, control group; HR, heart rate; BPsys, BPdia, systolic and diastolic blood pressure; SpO2, oxygen saturation; FEVC, forced expiratory vital capacity; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in the 1st sec.

Exercise testing

Participants performed a graded exercise test to exhaustion on a cycle ergometer (Ergoselect 100, Ergoline®, Bitz, Germany). The starting work load was set at 50 watts and was increased by 50 watts every 3 minutes. During the test, heart rate (HR) was registered continuously whereas blood pressure, oxygen saturation measured by finger pulse oximetry (SpO2) and rating of perceived exertion (RPE, Borg) were determined at the end of each stage. Gas exchange variables, including the rate of ventilation (VE), oxygen uptake (VO2) and carbon dioxide output (VCO2) were recorded breath by breath with a portable gas analyser (Oxycon Mobile; CareFusion, Germany). The test was considered maximal when 3 of the following criteria were fulfilled: VO2 plateau at peak exercise, respiratory exchange ratio (VCO2/VO2) > 1.10, peak HR reaching at least 90% of the theoretical maximal HR predicted for age and gender, an indication of maximal exhaustion by the participant. Maximal power output (Pmax) was defined as the last completed work rate plus the fraction of time spent in the final uncompleted work rate multiplied by 50 watts. VO2max was calculated as the mean of all VO2 values measured within the last 30 s of the test. The ventilator threshold (VT) was defined as the point of a nonlinear increase in VE in combination with an increasing equivalent for oxygen (VE/VO2) without a concomitant increase in the ventilatory equivalent of CO2 (VE/VCO2). Furthermore, at the end of every stage blood lactate concentration ([La]) was measured (Biosen 5040, EKF, Germany) from capillary blood samples drawn from the earlobe.

Statistics

Descriptive statistics are presented as means ± standard deviations (SD). After testing normality mixed-design ANOVA (time x treatment x sex) was used to evaluate treatment and sex effects/interactions. Main outcome measures (Pmax, VO2max, maximal oxygen pulse) are reported separately for males and females of both groups and paired t-tests were used for the evaluation of pre-post changes within groups. Significance was accepted at P < 0.05. Data analyses were conducted with the use of the SPSS statistical software package.

Results

Study participants completed all measurements. Altitude exposure in the hypoxic chamber was well tolerated by the participants except for one subject who collapsed after the ergometer cycle test in the hypoxic chamber for a few seconds but without any further adverse consequences. No side effects including paresthesias and/or altered taste have been reported during or post ACZ intake.

Changes of body mass, resting cardiopulmonary and haematological parameters from pre- to post-treatment with ACZ or placebo did not differ between groups (Table 1). Only haematocrit tended to increase after ACZ compared to placebo without differences between sexes. Absolute and relative VO2max values and maximal oxygen pulse decreased and VE/VO2 tended to increase in hypoxia after ACZ pre-treatment compared to placebo (Table 2). Maximal power output and submaximal exercise responses did not change differently from pre- to post-treatment between ACZ and placebo. ANOVA results suggest a significant sex-effect of ACZ treatment on VO2max (and maximal oxygen pulse) (Table 2). Thus, maximal performance data are reported separately for males and females of both groups (Table 3). Significant within-group changes from pre to post were only found for absolute and relative VO2max values in males of the ACZ group however, changes from pre to post did not reach significance between sexes (P = 0.8); (Table 3; Figure 1). No treatment-dependent sex differences were observed for submaximal exercise performance.

Table 2.

Maximal and submaximal exercise responses pre- and post-drug intake in hypoxia

ACZ group (n = 8) CG (n = 8) ANOVA time x treatment ANOVA* time x treatment x gender

Pre Post Pre Post
Maximal responses
    Pmax [watts] 225.0±46.3 209.4±37.6 240.6±62.6 218.8±63.7 n.s. n.s.
    Prel [watts/kg] 3.4±0.3 3.2±0.4 3.5±0.5 3.2±0.6 n.s. n.s.
    VO2max [ml/min] 2,587±647 2,395±530 2,619±629 2,647±720 .031 < 0.01
    VO2max [ml/min/kg] 38.5±4.7 36.1±3.9 38.2±4.2 38.6±6.1 .047 0.02
    SpO2 [%] at VO2max 70.0±5.5 71.0±5.9 69.0±7.4 69.4±5.1 n.s. n.s.
    HRmax [b/min] 181±7.1 179.6±8.3 178.3±11.1 178.6±13.6 n.s. n.s.
    O2Pulsemax [ml/beat] 14.3±3.6 13.4±3.0 14.7±3.3 14.8±4.0 .045 0.02
    VEmax [l/min] 117.9±36.0 120.4±29.9 129.8±38.5 128.5±41.6 n.s. n.s.
    VE/VO2 at VO2max 43.3±4.2 48.2±5.0 47.0±5.5 46.0±6.4 .06 .08
    Lamax [mmol/l] 8.9±3.1 8.2±2.1 7.9±3.1 8.2±3.7 n.s. n.s.
    BPsysmax [mmHg] 224.1±10.2 214.3±11.8 217.9±9.6 217.3±20.4 n.s. n.s
    BPdiamax [mmHg] 86.6±8.6 78.3±10.6 87.8±7.7 79.4±10.9 n.s. n.s.
    RPE (Borg 0-20) 19 (18.3-19.8) 19.1 (19-19.8) 19.1 (19-19.8) 19 (18.3-20) n.s. n.s.
Submaximal responses
    VO2 at VT [ml/min] 1,894±488 1,696±465 2,010±592 1,946±665 n.s. n.s.
    VE at VT [l/min] 65.9±19.2 64.5±19.9 69.0±22.3 63.5±20.4 n.s. n.s.
    HR at VT [b/min] 157.4±14.5 149.0±14.8 151.5±11.5 148.1±14.4 n.s. n.s.
    O2Pulse at VT [ml/beat] 12.2±3.4 11.4±3.0 13.2±3.5 13.1±4.2 n.s. n.s.

Data are mean values ± SD. P-values in italics indicate a trend toward significance (< 0.1 but > 0.05).

*

mixed design ANOVA has been used.

ACZ, acetazolamide; CG, control group; P, power; VO2, oxygen uptake; SpO2, oxygen saturation; HR, heart rate; VE, minute ventilation; La, blood lactate; BPsys, BPdia, systolic and diastolic blood pressure; RPE, rating of perceived exertion; VT, ventilatory threshold.

Table 3.

Sec-specific changes of maximal performance parameters from pre- to post-treatment

ACZ group CG


Males (n = 4) Females (n = 4) Males (n = 4) Females (n = 4)


Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post
Pmax [watts] 262.5±25.0 237.5±25.0 187.5±25.0 181.3±23.9 293.8±31.5 275.0±20.4 187.5±25.0 162.5±25.0
Prel [watts/kg] 3.5±0.3 3.1±0.4 3.3±0.4 3.2±0.4 3.8±0.4 3.6±0.3 3.2±0.3 2.8±0.6
VO2max [ml/min] 3,113.3±358.0 2,814.3±265.0* 2,061.5±332.4 1,975.8±340.1 3,157.8±302.2 3,261.5±388.9 2,079.5±237.2 2,032.8±225.9
VO2max [ml/min/kg] 40.9±3.6 37.2±3.1* 36.0±4.7 35.1±4.8 40.8±3.8 42.5±4.5 35.6±3.2 34.8±5.3
O2Pulsemax [ml/beat] 17.2±1.7 15.8±0.8 11.5±2.3 10.9±2.2 17.5±1.9 18.0±3.0 11.9±1.1 11.6±0.6

Data are mean values ± SD. ACZ, acetazolamide; CG, control group; P, power; VO2, oxygen uptake.

*

indicates significant differences between pre and post; changes from pre to post did not differ between sexes of the ACZ group.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Individual changes of maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) in males and females from pre- to post-treatment with acetazolamide (ACZ) or placebo.

Discussion

The main findings of the present study are that pre-treatment with low-dose (3×125 mg within 36 hours) ACZ slightly affected maximal aerobic capacity but not maximal power output or submaximal exercise responses. To our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating low-dose ACZ effects on exercise performance in hypoxia.

It has been suggested that ACZ doses of 7-12 mg/kg as used for instance in the study by Garske et al. may inhibit CA in red blood cells and tissue [13] likely resulting in inefficient CO2 transport during exercise [11-13]. In contrast, participants of the present study showed slightly reduced aerobic capacity at an ACZ dose even below 5 mg/kg. This observation seems to be particularly true for males since females had relatively higher ACZ doses due to their lower body mass. Studies demonstrating compromised exercise performance in acute hypoxia mostly included only male subjects [13-16] or a large proportion of males [12] therefore, at least partly supporting our findings. These studies however, used higher ACZ doses. The tendency of a larger VO2max reduction in males may be simply due to their higher baseline VO2max and/or because they are more sensitive to the performance limiting effect of ACZ than females. Differences in ACZ sensitivity are also supported by the tendency of increased VE/VO2 in men with ACZ probably linked to more distinct peripheral and/or central chemoreceptor stimulation [18]. On the other hand however, sex-dependent performance differences could also result from benefits of ACZ intake in women. Karnik and colleagues suggested that women in comparison to men have a significantly increased cerebral vasodilatory capacity after ACZ [21]. This might help to maintain cerebral oxygenation and aerobic exercise performance [22] thereby compensating for negative ACZ effects, e.g. arising from the impairment of metabolic processes involved in muscle contraction [18]. Furthermore, decreased plasma volume and maximal stroke volume resulting from enhanced diuresis might also contribute to the reduced VO2max and maximal oxygen pulse observed in the present study. However, this mechanism is rather unlikely because ACZ treatment did not cause sex-dependent different changes in body mass or haematocrit. Although there was a small decrease in the aerobic capacity after low-dose ACZ, maximal power and submaximal exercise responses remained unaffected. Thus, the presented findings may be of practical importance, possibly more meaningful for female mountaineers, because low-dose ACZ (125 mg bd, a dose less than 5 mg/kg) was found to prevent AMS development with similar effectiveness as 375 mg bd, in males and females as well [4]. This means that low-dose ACZ would prevent both, AMS development and a pronounced reduction in exercise performance. Since submaximal exercise and maximal power output were not affected by low-dose ACZ, especially mountaineers and athletes susceptible to AMS should benefit from ACZ pre-treatment.

Limitations

Of course, the small size of sub-samples may represent an important limitation when interpreting potential sex-differences. However, with regard to the effects of ACZ versus placebo we are convinced of a sufficient study power (based on data provided by Garske et al. [13]). Nevertheless, these findings may only be valid for the specific conditions of the present study (young and healthy subjects; graded exercise in acute hypoxia equivalent to about 4000 m).

In conclusion, low-dose ACZ (125 mg bd) did not affect maximal power output and submaximal exercise performance but compromised slightly maximal aerobic exercise capacity during acute exposure to normobaric hypoxia. Further studies are necessary to evaluate whether women are actually less affected by ACZ pre-treatment than men.

Disclosure of conflict of interest

None.

References

  • 1.Basnyat B, Murdoch DR. High-altitude illness. Lancet. 2003;361:1967–1974. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13591-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Imray C, Wright A, Subudhi A, Roach R. Acute mountain sickness: pathophysiology, prevention, and treatment. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2010;52:467–484. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2010.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Basnyat B, Gertsch JH, Johnson EW, Castro-Marin F, Inoue Y, Yeh C. Efficacy of low-dose acetazolamide (125 mg BID) for the prophylaxis of acute mountain sickness: a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. High Alt Med Biol. 2003;4:45–52. doi: 10.1089/152702903321488979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Basnyat B, Gertsch JH, Holck PS, Johnson EW, Luks AM, Donham BP, Fleischman RJ, Gowder DW, Hawksworth JS, Jensen BT, Kleiman RJ, Loveridge AH, Lundeen EB, Newman SL, Noboa JA, Miegs DP, O’Beirne KA, Philpot KB, Schultz MN, Valente MC, Wiebers MR, Swenson ER. Acetazolamide 125 mg BD is not significantly different from 375 mg BD in the prevention of acute mountain sickness: the prophylactic acetazolamide dosage comparison for efficacy (PACE) trial. High Alt Med Biol. 2006;7:17–27. doi: 10.1089/ham.2006.7.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Carlsten C, Swenson ER, Ruoss S. A doseresponse study of acetazolamide for acute mountain sickness prophylaxis in vacationing tourists at 12,000 feet (3630 m) High Alt Med Biol. 2004;5:33–39. doi: 10.1089/152702904322963672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wright A, Brearey S, Imray C. High hopes at high altitudes: pharmacotherapy for acute mountain sickness and high-altitude cerebral and pulmonary oedema. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2008;9:119–127. doi: 10.1517/14656566.9.1.119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kayser B, Dumont L, Lysakowski C, Combescure C, Haller G, Tramèr MR. Reappraisal of acetazolamide for the prevention of acute mountain sickness: a systematic review and metaanalysis. High Alt Med Biol. 2012;13:82–92. doi: 10.1089/ham.2011.1084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Swenson ER, Teppema LJ. Prevention of acute mountain sickness by acetazolamide: as yet an unfinished story. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2007;102:1305–1307. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01407.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hackett PH, Roach RC. High-altitude illness. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:107–114. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200107123450206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Höhne C, Pickerodt PA, Francis RC, Boemke W, Swenson ER. Pulmonary vasodilation by acetazolamide during hypoxia is unrelated to carbonic anhydrase inhibition. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2007;292:L178–184. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00205.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Swenson ER. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors and ventilation: a complex interplay of stimulation and suppression. Eur Respir J. 1998;12:1242–1247. doi: 10.1183/09031936.98.12061242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bradwell AR, Myers SD, Beazley M, Ashdown K, Harris NG, Bradwell SB, Goodhart J, Imray CH, Wimalasena Y, Edsell ME, Pattinson KT, Wright AD, Harris SJ Birmingham Medical Research Expeditionary Society. Exercise limitation of acetazolamide at altitude (3459 m) Wilderness Environ Med. 2014;25:272–277. doi: 10.1016/j.wem.2014.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Garske LA, Brown MG, Morrison SC. Acetazolamide reduces exercise capacity and increases leg fatigue under hypoxic conditions. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2003;94:991–996. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00746.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hackett PH, Schoene RB, Winslow RM, Peters RM, West JB. Acetazolamide and exercise in sojourners to 6,300 meters--a preliminary study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1985;17:593–597. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Stager JM, Tucker A, Cordain L, Engebretsen BJ, Brechue WF, Matulich CC. Normoxic and acute hypoxic exercise tolerance in man following acetazolamide. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1990;22:178–184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.McLellan T, Jacobs I, Lewis W. Acute altitude exposure and altered acid-base states. II. Effects on exercise performance and muscle and blood lactate. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1988;57:445–451. doi: 10.1007/BF00417991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Faoro V, Huez S, Giltaire S, Pavelescu A, van Osta A, Moraine JJ, Guenard H, Martinot JB, Naeije R. Effects of acetazolamide on aerobic exercise capacity and pulmonary hemodynamics at high altitudes. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2007;103:1161–1165. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00180.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fulco CS, Muza SR, Ditzler D, Lammi E, Lewis SF, Cymerman A. Effect of acetazolamide on leg endurance exercise at sea level and simulated altitude. Clin Sci (Lond) 2006;110:683–692. doi: 10.1042/CS20050233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jonk AM, van den Berg IP, Olfert IM, Wray DW, Arai T, Hopkins SR, Wagner PD. Effect of acetazolamide on pulmonary and muscle gas exchange during normoxic and hypoxic exercise. J Physiol. 2007;579:909–921. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.120949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Schoene RB, Bates PW, Larson EB, Pierson DJ. Effect of acetazolamide on normoxic and hypoxic exercise in humans at sea level. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1983;55:1772–1776. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1983.55.6.1772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Karnik R, Valentin A, Winkler WB, Khaffaf N, Donath P, Slany J. Sex-related differences in acetazolamide-induced cerebral vasomotor reactivity. Stroke. 1996;27:56–58. doi: 10.1161/01.str.27.1.56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fan JL, Kayser B. Fatigue and exhaustion in hypoxia: The role of cerebral oxygenation. High Alt Med Biol. 2016;17:72–84. doi: 10.1089/ham.2016.0034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Physiology, Pathophysiology and Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of e-Century Publishing Corporation

RESOURCES