Skip to main content
The Application of Clinical Genetics logoLink to The Application of Clinical Genetics
. 2017 May 11;10:27–35. doi: 10.2147/TACG.S127531

Mutation analysis of β-thalassemia in East-Western Indian population: a recent molecular approach

Parth S Shah 1, Nidhi D Shah 2, Hari Shankar P Ray 3, Nikunj B Khatri 3, Ketan K Vaghasia 3, Rutvik J Raval 4, Sandip C Shah 3,, Mandava V Rao 5
PMCID: PMC5436775  PMID: 28546763

Abstract

Background

β-Thalassemia is the most prevalent genetic disorder in India. Its traits and coinheritance vary from mild to severe conditions, resulting in thalassemia minor, intermediate, and major, depending upon many factors.

Purpose

The objective of this study was to identify the incidence of β-thalassemia traits, their coinheritance, and mutations, as well as to support the patients already diagnosed with β-thalassemia in East-Western Indian population for better management.

Patients and methods

Seventy-five referral cases for β-thalassemia were analyzed for various β-thalassemia traits, heterozygosity, and homozygosity conditions. Blood phenotypic parameters using cell counter and capillary electrophoresis were investigated. Analyses of eight common mutations of thalassemia in India were carried out using polymerase chain reaction-amplification refractory mutation system, end point polymerase chain reaction, and DNA sequencing methods.

Results

Of these (75) referral cases from East-Western Indian region, 68 were positive for β-thalassemia (90.67%). The majority of case types were of β-thalassemia minor (49, 65.33%), followed by HbE traits (6, 8.0%) and β-thalassemia major, including heterozygous and homozygous (5, 6.66%; 4, 5.33%) types and then HbE homozygous (2, 2.66%), as well as one each of the HbE/β-thalassemia and HbD/β-thalassemia (1, 1.34%) combination. Mutation analysis also revealed that the highest frequency of mutation was c.92+5G>C (41, 60.29%) followed by deletion 619bp (9, 13.23%) and c.79G>A (8, 11.76%) in our study group. Five cases (nos. 24, 27, 33, 58, and 71) exhibited coinheritance between β0+ (2), β0/β D (1), and c.124_127delTTCT/β+ or β0(2) affecting the Rajasthani and Gujarati populations in our study of the Western region of India.

Conclusion

We strongly recommend these Western populations for genetic screening before adopting reproductive technologies and interracial marital relations.

Keywords: β-thalassemia traits, coinheritance, hematogram, capillary electrophoresis, PCR-ARMS, DNA sequencing, mutation analysis, East-Western India

Introduction

β-Thalassemia is one of the hemoglobinopathies belonging to a class of genetic disorders. It occurs due to mutation in β-gene of autosomal chromosome 11.1 The incidence of β-thalassemia trait in India is 3.3% with 1%–7% of couples being affected annually.2 Approximately 300 mutations would occur in this type, affecting β-chain globin synthesis. If the synthesis of two β-chains is absent (β00), the person has β-thalassemia major (Cooley’s anemia). This condition follows severe microcytic and hyochromic anemia. The person requires lifelong transfusion. β-Thalassemia minor is asymptomatic and results in microcytosis and mild anemia and HbA2 level increases, designated as β+/β or β0/β. Usually thalassemia intermedia is a condition between the major and minor forms depending on the severity of the anemic condition (β++/or β0+) among other cases.3,4 Others are HbE trait, HbE homozygous, HbD/β-thalassemia, and HbE/β-thalassemia hemoglobinopathies. The latter one, HbE/β-thalassemia, is maximum in Thailand.5 The gene mutation takes place in another one of β-gene only in addition to β-thalassemia minor/allele (β0/β or β+/β), leading to coin-heritance. In India, such coexisting HbE/β-thalassemia and HbD/β-thalassemia are less debated and occur in some parts of India, Pakistan, and Iran.6,7 Recently, a report was published in Eastern Indian population about the status of thalassemia and hemoglobinopathies and suggested that more such studies are necessary in other regions of India.8 Prevalence of common hemoglobinopathies in Gujarati population was documented by Patel et al9 in screening programs, where β-thalassemia minor cases were maximum comparatively. Hence, we report β-thalassemia, HbE, HbD traits, and their coinheritance as well as the mutation analysis of β-thalassemia distribution in East-Western Indian population using electrophoresis, polymerase chain reaction-amplification refractory mutation system (PCR-ARMS), end point PCR, and gene sequencing technology in our study.

Patients and methods

Patient selection

Blood samples of 75 referral cases of both sexes varying in age from 6 months to 38 years were collected from Gujarat (17), Rajasthan (40), Maharashtra (7), Assam (3), and West Bengal (6) in India for β-thalassemia testing after duly filling the patient consent form in our Supratech Micropath Research Institute, Ahmedabad. These patients were referred at random. This project was approved by Human Ethical Committee (HEC) of Gujarat University, Ahmedabad (GU/HEC-001/15), in 2015 for investigation.

Hematological analysis and DNA extraction

Hematogram report was carried out on CELL DYN RUBY automated cell counter. Hemoglobin (Hb) levels were estimated by Sebia Capillary 2 Flex piercing electrophoresis. The DNA was extracted from 2 mL of EDTA blood using PerkinElmer Prepito DNA Blood 250 Kit automatic machine. The kit was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted genomic DNA was used as a template and was kept at 4°C until further use after routine DNA check.

Amplification, purification, and cycle sequencing

The primers were synthesized from the Eurofins, India. The amplification reaction was performed in Veriti Thermal Cycler. The PCR products were loaded on a 2.5% agarose gel, and the amplicons were visualized under ultraviolet transillumination after staining with ethidium bromide. PCR product cleanup using USB ExoSAP-IT kit (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and cycle sequencing using BigDye Termi-natorV3.1 cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) were used for further mutation identification.

Mutation analysis

The β-globin gene mutations were first characterized using two sets of allele-specific PCR-ARMS to detect eight common mutations in India including c.92+5G>C, deletion 619 bp, c.79G>A (p.E27K), c.47G>A (p.Trp16Ter), c.364G>C (p.E122Q), c.27_28insG, c.51delC, and c.124_127delTTCT. Unknown β-thalassemia genes were further characterized by direct DNA sequencing using 3500 Genetic Analyzer Applied Biosystems (ABI) for all coding regions and exon–intron boundaries to detect uncommon point mutations and small rearrangements in the β-globin gene. The c.92+5G>C mutation was detected by Sanger sequencing and PCR-ARMS, and deletion 619 bp was done by end point PCR (gel electrophoresis). Other mutations were analyzed only by Sanger sequencer. The data were analyzed using CodonCode Aligner v5.0.2 (CodonCode Corporation, Centerville, MA, USA) and Mutation Surveyor v5.0 (Softgenetics, State College, PA, USA). Mean and percentage were calculated wherever necessary.

Results

β-Thalassemia and other traits

Referral cases of 75 at our Supratech Micropath Research Institute, Ahmedabad, from 2015 to 2016 were analyzed for β-thalassemia and other traits based on Hb levels blood indices and mutation analysis from different parts of India. The affected (68) contributed 90.67% of the referral cases. High percentage (65.33%) had β-thalassemia followed by HbE trait (8%) and β-thalassemia major (heterozygous 6.66%; homozygous 5.33%). Others were HbE homozygous (2.66%), HbE/β-thalassemia, and HbD/β-thalassemia contributed only 1.34% each. Thus, 49 cases (65.33%) had β-thalassemia minor followed by HbE trait (8%) and β-thalassemia major (compound heterozygous 6.66% and homozygous 5.33%). Two were HbE homozygous (2.66%) and HbE/β-thalassemia and HbD/β-thalassemia contributed only 1.34% each. These hemoglobinopathies are well supported by increased levels of mean HbA2 (08.66%) with decreased mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular volume values, and altered mean HbD (1.25%), HbF (7.21%), and HbE (2.73%) levels, measured by capillary electrophoresis (Tables 1 and 2 and Figure 1).

Table 1.

Classification of thalassemia traits in our study

Nos Types of thalassemia traits Characteristics Cases Percentage
1 β-thalassemia minor Increased HbA2 with ↓ MCV and ↑ RDW 49 65.33
2 HbE trait ↑ HbA2/E, HbF, and ↓ HbA and ↑ RDW 6 8.00
3 β-thalassemia major (compound heterozygous) ↑ HbA2 with ↓ MCV, ↑ HbF, and ↑ RDW 5 6.66
4 β-thalassemia major (homozygous) ↑ HbA2 with ↓ MCV,↑ HbF, and ↑ RDW 4 5.33
5 HbE homozygous ↑ HbA2/E, HbF, and ↓ HbA and ↑ RDW 2 2.66
6 Combination of HbE/β-thalassemia ↑ HbA2/E, HbF, and ↓ HbA and ↑ RDW 1 1.34
7 Combination of Hb-D/β-thalassemia ↑ HbAD, HbA2, and HbF ↑ (sometimes) and ↑ RDW 1 1.34

Notes: Total cases 75; affected cases 68 (90.67%).

Abbreviations: ↑, increase; ↓, decrease; Hb, hemoglobin; HbF, fetal hemoglobin; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; RDW, red blood cell distribution width.

Table 2.

Sex wise distribution of Hb variants and mutations in our study

Nos Age, years Sex HbA (%) MCV (fL) MCH (pg) RDW (%) HbA2 (%) HbE (%) HbF (%) HbD (%) Mutations Genotype Inference/clinical report Technique(s)
1 24 Female 94.30 75.00 24.00 14.60 5.00 0.0 0.70 c.92+5G>C B+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
2 27 Male 94.50 67.00 18.20 17.00 4.70 0.0 0.80 c.47G>A (p.Trp16Ter) B0 β-thalassemia minor SS
3 25 Female 93.95 69.50 20.80 17.10 5.40 0.0 0.65 c.92+5G>C B+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
4 28 Male 93.75 75.50 18.40 41.30 5.40 0.0 0.85 c.92+5G>C B+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
5 25 Female 94.61 69.00 21.00 17.80 4.80 0.0 0.59 c.92+5G>C B+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
6 5 Female 65.65 69.90 18.50 15.10 33.60 0.0 0.75 c.92+5G>C B++ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
7 28 Male 94.35 68.00 21.00 18.00 4.70 0.95 c.92+5G>C B+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
8 28 Female 93.40 76.40 23.80 15.60 5.40 1.20 c.92+5G>C B+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
9 30 Male 92.50 75.00 22.40 14.70 6.60 0.90 Not detected* β/β Normal SS and GE
10 25 Female 93.95 74.90 18.60 15.00 5.00 1.05 c.92+5G>C B+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
11 30 Male 96.80 79.90 28.00 14.00 2.60 0.60 Not detected β/β Normal SS and GE
12 33 Female 66.50 71.00 27.90 14.60 22.96 9.84 0.70 c.79G>A (p.Glu27Lys) βE HbE trait SS
13 33 Male 92.80 70.10 20.90 16.90 6.60 0.60 c.47G>A (p.Trp16Ter) β0 β-thalassemia minor SS
14 20 Female 94.55 68.60 18.50 16.20 4.70 0.75 c.92+5G>C β+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
15 28 Male 94.00 76.30 19.40 17.40 5.20 0.80 c.92+5G>C β+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
16 6 Male 87.50 67.00 18.10 19.40 2.20 10.30 c.92+5G>C β++ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
17 26 Female 93.80 68.50 19.40 16.20 5.70 0.50 619 bp deletion β0 β-thalassemia minor GE
18 28 Male 95.20 68.30 20.80 15.50 4.60 0.20 c.92+5G>C β+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
19 1 Female 94.90 70.20 19.20 16.90 2.70 2.40 c.92+5G>C β+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
20 29 Male 17.90 67.50 18.40 16.30 68.90 12.70 0.50 c.79G>A (p.E27K) βE HbE trait SS
21 24 Female 66.15 69.00 27.80 14.50 23.52 10.08 0.25 c.79G>A (p.Glu27Lys) βE HbE trait SS
22 31 Male 94.35 74.20 21.00 16.40 5.20 0.45 c.92+5G>C β+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
23 27 Female 93.45 67.00 22.80 17.70 5.90 0.65 c.92+5G>C β+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
24 1 Male 6.70 69.20 21.40 38.20 3.30 90.0 c.47G>A (p.Trp16Ter) and c.92+5G>C β0/β+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
25 30 Male 95.55 73.90 21.50 15.90 4.20 0.25 c.47G>A (p.Trp16Ter) β0/β β-thalassemia minor SS
26 35 Female 93.70 69.50 20.80 17.20 5.70 0.60 c.92+5G>C β+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
27 5 Male 4.00 66.90 18.50 15.90 58.80 25.80 11.40 c.79G>A (p.Glu27Lys) and c.92+5G>C β0/β+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
28 30 Female 93.20 68.00 22.30 16.60 6.20 0.60 c.92+5G>C β+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
29 32 Female 2.90 67.30 18.20 17.00 61.80 28.20 7.10 c.79G>A (p.Glu27Lys) β E/β HbE trait SS
30 4 Male 4.00 69.50 21.60 37.50 1.10 94.90 c.51delC β0/β β-thalassemia minor SS
31 26 Female 93.50 66.40 21.70 18.20 5.90 0.60 c.27_28insG β0/β β-thalassemia minor SS
32 2 Female 1.40 65.30 18.40 16.70 2.20 96.40 c.27_28insG β00 β-thalassemia minor SS
33 27 Male 1.55 75.30 22.80 16.30 3.80 0.25 94.40 c.27_28insG and c.364G>C (p.E122Q) β0D HbD/β-thalassemia SS
34 27 Female 96.10 70.30 21.90 17.20 3.60 0.30 619 bp deletion β0/β β-thalassemia minor GE
35 30 Male 95.40 68.50 21.20 17.70 4.10 0.50 619 bp deletion β0/β β-thalassemia minor GE
36 27 Female 94.75 62.20 20.40 16.80 4.80 0.45 c.92+5G>C β+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
37 30 Male 93.65 64.20 19.60 15.70 5.80 0.55 c.92+5G>C β+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
38 23 Female 93.45 69.80 22.50 14.70 6.20 0.35 c.47G>A β0/β β-thalassemia minor SS
39 26 Male 97.10 75.90 24.50 13.40 2.80 0.10 Not detected β/β Normal SS and GE
40 29 Female 94.95 68.90 22.30 16.90 4.80 0.25 92+5G>C β+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
41 31 Male 96.10 69.30 20.50 15.70 3.90 0.00 92+5G>C β+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
42 5 Female 94.75 69.70 22.40 15.80 5.00 0.25 92+5G>C β++ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
43 8 Female 80.00 68.50 21.60 16.80 14.00 6.00 0.00 c.79G>A β E HbE trait SS
44 31 Female 94.27 64.20 19.50 15.80 5.28 0.45 c.92+5G>C β+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
45 33 Male 93.00 69.40 20.40 17.80 6.60 0.40 c.92+5G>C β+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
46 4 Female 3.70 67.00 19.20 15.50 1.60 94.70 c.92+5G>C β+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
47 33 Female 94.40 69.50 20.70 17.60 5.40 0.20 619 bp deletion β0/β β-thalassemia minor GE
48 35 Male 94.50 64.10 19.70 16.90 5.20 0.30 619 bp deletion β0/β β-thalassemia minor GE
49 30 Female 95.60 63.10 19.90 16.00 4.20 0.20 c.92+5G>C β+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
50 32 Male 94.80 70.00 20.10 15.80 4.80 0.40 c.92+5G>C β+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
51 26 Female 94.40 68.90 19.40 17.10 4.90 0.70 c.92+5G>C β+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
52 26 Male 94.65 69.90 20.30 17.60 4.80 0.55 c.92+5G>C β+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
53 ½ Female 94.70 68.10 18.90 17.90 2.40 2.90 c.92+5G>C β+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
54 35 Female 91.10 69.50 20.80 17.00 8.20 0.70 Not detected* SS and GE
55 38 Male 91.50 63.10 19.50 16.00 7.90 0.60 Not detected* SS and GE
56 4 Female 94.50 75.00 23.10 14.00 5.00 0.50 Not detected* SS and GE
57 5 Female 93.30 75.60 25.00 14.10 6.10 0.60 Not detected* SS and GE
58 22 Female 93.80 69.00 21.40 38.20 5.80 0.40 c.124_127delTTCT** and c.92+5 G>C **+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
59 26 Male 94.30 63.20 19.50 16.10 5.20 0.50 c.92+5G>C β+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
60 29 Female 93.55 67.40 19.10 17.80 6.10 0.35 619 bp deletion β0/β β-thalassemia minor GE
61 30 Female 93.95 69.10 21.80 17.80 5.50 0.55 619 bp deletion β0/β β-thalassemia minor GE
62 28 Female 94.00 69.00 21.40 38.20 5.40 0.60 619 bp deletion β0/β β-thalassemia minor GE
63 30 Male 93.60 69.40 20.70 17.00 5.90 0.50 c.27_28insG β0/β β-thalassemia minor SS
64 27 Female 94.40 69.00 21.80 17.40 5.20 0.40 c.92+5G>C β+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
65 30 Male 94.30 67.10 18.20 19.10 5.00 0.70 c.27_28insG β0/β β-thalassemia minor SS
66 24 Male 93.20 69.00 21.70 17.80 6.10 0.70 619 bp deletion β0/β β-thalassemia minor GE
67 26 Male 91.75 62.40 19.90 18.20 7.90 0.35 c.92+5G>C β+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
68 26 Female 94.35 68.90 20.90 17.60 4.90 0.75 c.92+5G>C β+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
69 23 Male 93.80 73.90 20.10 14.60 5.50 0.70 c.92+5G>C β+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
70 27 Female 94.40 74.30 19.30 15.90 5.00 0.60 c.92+5G>C β+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
71 24 Male 0.0 72.90 21.00 14.50 3.40 96.60 c.51_51delC and c.124_127delTTCT** β0/** β-thalassemia minor SS
72 26 Male 94.20 68.40 21.00 14.00 5.20 0.60 c.92+5G>C β+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS
73 27 Female 69.80 74.20 20.30 14.40 20.73 8.97 0.50 c.79G>A (p.E27K) βE HbE trait SS
74 28 Male 68.40 70.20 21.80 16.90 21.70 9.30 0.60 c.79G>A (p.E27K) βE HbE trait SS
75 27 Male 95.40 64.20 20.10 16.40 3.90 0.70 c.92+5G>C β+ β-thalassemia minor SS and PCR-ARMS

Notes: Total cases: 75; age range (1/2 to 38 years). Case nos: 24, 27, 33, 58, and 71 had double mutations (compound heterozygous). Mean HbA = 81.37 (96.8%–97.8%), mean MCV = 69.53 (83–100 fL), mean MCH = 20.92 (27–32 pg), mean RDW = 17.85 (11.5%–14.5%), mean HbA2 = 8.66 (2%–3.5%), mean HbE = 2.73% (absent), HbD = 1.25% (absent), and HbF = 7.21 (0.0%–1.0%). Figures in parentheses indicate normal range/values.

*

Large deletion and duplication are not identified in our study.

**

Genotype novel.

Abbreviations: GE, gel electrophoresis; Hb, hemoglobin; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; PCR-ARMS, polymerase chain reaction-amplification refractory mutation system; RDW, red blood cell distribution width; SS, Sanger sequencing.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Percentage (%) distribution of β-thalassemia traits.

Mutation analysis

We have analyzed conventional mutations of eight in Indian population using PCR-ARMS and end point PCR allayed with using Codon code Aligner V6.0.2 and mutation survey 5.0 software for exact specific mutation nomenclature from 68 affected cases. The data showed that c.92+5 G>C was higher (41, 60.29%), followed by nine cases of deletion 619 bp (13.23%), eight cases of c.79G>A (p.E27K) (11.76%), and five cases each of c.27_28insG (7.35%) and c.47G>A (p.Trp16Ter) (7.35%) with two cases each of c.124_127delTTCT (2.94%) and c.51delC (2.94%) and one case each of c.364G>C (p.E122Q) and c.47G>A (p.Trp16Ter) (1.47%), respectively, with no sex difference as female and male ratio was (1:1.13) (Table 3). Deletion 619 bp was only detected by gel electrophoresis, and c.92+5G>C was identified using PCR-ARMS and also gene sequencing as that of others (Figure 2A–G). In Rajasthan and Gujarat, where more are accumulated (40 and 17) respectively, in both cases, the most frequent mutation is c.92+G>C (26 and 10) followed by 619 bp (3 and 4) and 619 bp deletions (Table 3 and Figure 3).

Table 3.

Percentage of mutation types in our thalassemic cases (68) of different regions

Nos Mutation types Mutation nos (73)* Male (34) Female (39) Mutation percentage Region (state) wise mutation
1 c.92+5G>C 41 18 23 60.29 Rajasthan 26, Gujarat 10, West Bengal 3, Maharashtra 2
2 619 bp deletion 9 3 6 13.23 Gujarat 4, Rajasthan 3, Maharashtra 2
3 c.79G>A (p.E27K) 8 4 4 11.76 Assam 3, Rajasthan 2, Maharashtra 1, West Bengal 2
4 c.47G>A (p.Trp16Ter) 5 4 1 7.35 Gujarat 2, Rajasthan 2, Maharashtra 1
5 c.364G>C (p.E122Q) 1 1 0 1.47 Rajasthan 1
6 c.27_28insG 5 2 3 7.35 Rajasthan 2, Gujarat 1, Maharashtra 1, West Bengal 1
7 c.51delC 2 2 0 1.47 Rajasthan 2
8 c.124_127delTTCT 2 0 2 1.47 Rajasthan 2

Notes: State/region wise mutations: Rajasthan: 40, Gujarat: 17, Maharashtra: 7 (Western India: 40 + 17 + 07 = 64), West Bengal: 6, Assam: 3 (Eastern India: 06 + 03 = 09).

*

Five with compound heterozygous (double mutations); M:F = 1:1.13 (32/36 = 68).

Abbreviations: F, female; M, male.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Seven common mutations identified by direct DNA sequencing.

Notes: (A) c.92+5G>C, (B) c.79G>A (p.E27K), (C) c.47G>A (p.Trp16 Ter), (D) c.364G>C (p.E122Q), (E) c.27_28insG, (F) c.51delC, and (G) c.124_127delTTCT. Nucleotide colors: A = green, T = red, G = black, and C = blue.

Abbreviations: S, G/C; R, G/A; K, G/T; M, C/A; Y, C/T.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Region wise percentage distribution of mutations in β-thalassemia and numbers in parentheses indicate cases.

Discussion

β-Thalassemia is one of the heterozygous inheritable disorders in India. It causes reduced or absence of β-chain synthesis of Hb. Its variants in addition to carrier identification and prenatal analysis are necessary for its management and to avoid marriages between carrier of mutated genes including consanguineous types.4,1012 Hence, from 75 referral cases of Western and Eastern India, the blood was collected to identify various traits and mutations accurately using electrophoretic and molecular diagnostic techniques in our laboratory including coinheritance with β-thalassemia. Of the total referral patients, 68 cases were affected having 90.67% in this study. Of these, 65.33% of β-thalassemia traits (49) were detected followed by HbE trait and β-thalassemia major with HbE homozygous and their HbE/β-thalassemia and HbD/β-thalassemia coinherited cases depending on altered Hb, MCH, red blood cell distribution width, and MCV values. It indicated that β-thalassemia cases (carriers) are maximum followed by others and support the data of previous workers in India.1316 Similarly, Hb patterns were measured and presented in the study of Mondal and Mandal,8 who obtained few cases of HbE, HbD traits, and β-thalassemia major comparatively. This could be due to changing lifestyles, environmental and genetic factors, and coinheritance of HbE, HbD, and/or α-thalassemia with β-thalassemia carriers.17,18 Further, these factors may also be the cause of β-thalassemia major with heterozygosity/homozygosity who are less in number requiring blood transfusion. Similarly, coinheritance of HbE/β-thalassemia and HbD/β-thalassemia and HbE homozygous cases were also reduced in number in our report. HbE trait had six cases having less severity of clinical condition. However, Olivieri et al17 mentioned that these conditions may vary from severe to mild depending upon genetic and environmental factors, and such patients are also less frequent to support our data. We detected one each of HbD/β-thalassemia and HbE/β-thalassemia cases in addition to HbE patients with variable phenotypic indices expressing mild heterozygous state.1922 These patients may require transfusion in severe condition only, due to coinheritance of the disease.23

Further, we extended our investigation on molecular analysis of mutations of β-thalassemia and systematically using latest molecular biology tools such as PCR-ARMS, end point PCR, and Sanger Gene Sequencing. Data revealed 92+5 G>C (IVS-1–5) is the maximum in cases (60.29%), of Rajasthan and Gujarat followed by deletion 619 bp and is conformed with others documented earlier in Gujarat, Maharashtra, and Rajasthan.2,9,12,15,2426 But Hassan et al,27 from Thailand, found cd26 (A–G) HbE and cd41/42 (−TTCT) were higher in their studies. Thong et al28 presented cd41/42 (−TTCT) and IVS-2 654 (C–T) were maximum in Chinese population. Similarly, second highest mutation was 619 bp in (9, 13.23%) this study similar to that of other studies in Western India conducted by Sheth et al,10 Grow et al,13 Colah et al,29 and Nigam et al.16 The third largest mutation in our study was c.79G>A (p.E27K) followed by c.47G>A (p.Trp16Ter) and c.27_28insG different from other investigators,2 followed by other mutations, ie, c.51delC, c.124_127delTTCT(novel), and c.364G>C (p.E122Q). The incidence of these mutations does not seem to be related to sex, as our sex ratio was 1:1.13 (M:F). The variation in occurrence of these mutations is related to regional, ethical, migration, interracial marriages, study plan, and other factors as mentioned by others.12,29,30

Conclusion

Our study showed that 68 cases were affected by β-thalassemia in our referral cases (75), from East-Western Indian region. β-Thalassemia carriers were 49 (65.33%) followed by HbE trait and β-thalassemia major with heterozygous and homozygous condition using hematological profiles. Detection of molecular analysis of mutations using PCR-ARMS, end point PCR, and gene sequencing methods revealed c.92+5G>C mutation exhibited higher incidence (26+10+2) followed by deletion 619 bp (3+4+2) in Rajasthan, Gujarat, and Maharashtra (Western India) as compared to West Bengal and Assam (3:0; 0:0) of Eastern India, respectively. This requires further elucidation. The variation in incidence of these mutations is dependent on ethnic diversity, migration, genetic factors, and other lifestyles. We, hence, recommend the mass screening, Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques, genetic counseling, transfusion programs and clinical management made available to these populations before adopting assisted reproductive and preimplantation technologies in India.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to all the staff including Clinicians of Supratech Micropath Laboratory, Ahmedabad, for their continuous assistance in this work. Parth S Shah, Nidhi D Shah, and Sandip C Shah are son, daughter-in-law, and father, respectively, who run this research institute.

Footnotes

Author contributions

Parth S Shah and Nidhi D Shah have contributed to writing results and discussion in the manuscript preparation when they visit India. Hari P Ray, Nikunj B Khatri, Ketan K Vaghasia, and Rutvik J Raval are involved in collection of blood from the patients after duly filled consent forms, blood analysis, DNA extraction, DNA sequencing, PCR-ARMS, end point PCR, and data analysis of 75 patients. Dr Sandip C Shah and Dr Mandava V Rao have contributed to preparation of reports after finalization of the results and preparation of the manuscript finally for submission to the journal. All authors contributed toward data analysis, drafting and critically revising the paper and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  • 1.Weatherall DJ, Clegg JB. Inherited haemoglobin disorders: an increasing global health problem. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(8):704–712. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ansari MI, Patel NG. Characterization of β-thalassemia mutations from north Maharashtra region. J Pharm Biol Sci. 2015;10(3):13–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cooley TB, Lee P. A series of cases of splenomegaly in children with anemia and peculiar bone changes. Trans Am Pediatr Soc. 1925;37:29–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rao MV, Shah SR, Patel AP. β-thalassemia. In: Gupta PD, Srivastava LM, editors. Essentials of Inborn Metabolic and Genetic Disorders. Chennai: Pug Publication Pvt Ltd; 2015. pp. 169–179. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Boonyawat B, Monsereenusorn C, Traivaree C. Molecular analysis of beta-globin gene mutations among thai beta-thalassemia children: results from a single center study. Appl Clin Genet. 2014;7:253–258. doi: 10.2147/TACG.S73058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Taghavi BM, Karimipoor M, Amirian A, et al. Co-inheritance of hemoglobin D and B-thalassemia trait in three Iranian families: clinical relevance. Arch Iran Med. 2011;14(1):61–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Abolghasemi H, Amid A, Zeinali S, et al. Thalassemia in Iran: epidemiology, prevention and management. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2007;29(4):233–238. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0b013e3180437e02. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mondal SK, Mandal S. Prevalence of thalassemia and hemoglobinopathy in eastern India: a 10-year high-performance liquid chromatography study of 119,336 cases. Asian J Transfus Sci. 2016;10(1):105–110. doi: 10.4103/0973-6247.175424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Patel AP, Naik MR, Shah NM, Sharma NP, Parmar PH. Prevalence of common hemoglobinopathies in Gujarat: an analysis of a large population screening program. Natl J Comm Med. 2012;3(1):112–116. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sheth JJ, Sheth FJ, Pandya P, et al. Beta thalassaemia mutations in western India. Ind J Pediatr. 2008;6:567–570. doi: 10.1007/s12098-008-0109-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mishra AK, Tiwari A. Screening and molecular characterization of β-thalassaemia mutations in parents and siblings of β-thalassaemia major patients. Ind J Basic Appl Medl Res. 2014;5(2):481–486. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cao A, Galanello R. Beta-thalassemia. Genet Med. 2010;12(2):61–76. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181cd68ed. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Grow K, Vashist M, Abrol P, Sharma S, Yadav R. Beta thalassemia in India: current status and the challenges ahead. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2014;6(4):28–33. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Balgir RS. The burden of haemoglobinopathies in India and the challenges ahead. Curr Sci. 2000;79(11):1536–1547. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Satpute SB, Bankar MP, Momin AA. The prevalence of β-thalassemia mutations in south western Maharashtra. Ind J Clin Biochem. 2012;27(4):389–393. doi: 10.1007/s12291-012-0230-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nigam N, Munshi M, Patel M, Soni A. Distribution of beta thalassemia mutation and its correlation with alpha thalassemia in Gujarati families. Int J Hum Genet. 2003;3(4):221–224. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Olivieri NF, Pakbaz Z, Vichinsky E. Hb E/beta-thalassaemia: a common & clinically diverse disorder Indian. J Med Res. 2011;134(4):522–531. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Colah R, Gorashekar A, Phanasgaonkar S, et al. Epidemiology of beta thalassemia in western India: mapping the frequencies & mutations in subversion of Maharashtra and Gujarat. Br J Haematol. 2010;149(5):739–747. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08131.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Burtis CA, Ashwood ER, Bruns DE. Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics. 5th ed. India: Elsevier; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Williamson MA, Snyder LM. Wallach’s Interpretation of Diagnostic Tests. 9th ed. New York, NY: Lippincott Pub; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Theodoridou S, Alemayechou M, Perperidou P, Sinopoulou C, Karafoulidou T, Kiriakopoulou G. Compound heterozygosity for Hb D-Punjab/b-thalassemia and blood donation: case report. Turk J Hematol. 2009;26(2):100–101. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rahimi Z, Akramipour R, Korani S, Nagel RL. Hb D-Punjab [beta 121 (GH4) Glu→Gln]/beta0-thalassemia [IVSII.1(G→A)] in two cases from an Iranian family: first report. Am J Hematol. 2006;81(4):302–303. doi: 10.1002/ajh.20537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Menzel S, Garner C, Gut I, et al. A QTL influencing F cell production maps to a gene encoding a zinc-finger protein on chromosome 2p15. Nat Genet. 2007;39(10):1197–1199. doi: 10.1038/ng2108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Panja A, Ghosh TK, Basu A. Genetics of thalassemia in Indian population. J Community Nutr Health. 2012;1(1):39–46. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bhukhanvala DS, Italia K, Sawant P, Colah R, Ghosh K, Gupte SC. Molecular characterization of β-thalassemia in four communities in South Gujarat-codon 30 (G→A) a predominant mutation in the Kachhiya Patel community. Ann Hematol. 2013;92(11):1473–1476. doi: 10.1007/s00277-013-1777-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Colah RB, Gorakshakar AC, Nadkarni AH. Invasive & noninvasive approaches for prenatal diagnosis of haemoglobinopathies: experiences from India. Ind J Med Res. 2011;134(4):552–560. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hassan S, Ahmad R, Zakaria Z, Zulkafli Z, Abdullah WZ. Detection of β-globin gene mutations among β-thalassaemia carriers and patients in Malaysia: application of multiplex amplification refractory mutation system–polymerase chain reaction. Malays J Med Sci. 2013;20(1):13–20. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Thong MK, Tan JA, Tan KL, Yap SF. Characterisation of beta-globin gene mutation in Malaysian children: a strategy for the control of beta-thalassemia in a develop country. J Trop Pediatr. 2005;51(6):328–333. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmi052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Colah R, Gorakshakar A, Nadkarni A, et al. Regional heterogeneity of beta-thalassemia mutations in the multi ethnic Indian population. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2009;42(3):241–246. doi: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2008.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nadkarni AH, Nair SB, Italia KY, et al. Molecular diversity of hemoglobin H disease in India. Am J Clin Pathol. 2010;133(3):491–494. doi: 10.1309/AJCP70ORBRURVSJM. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Application of Clinical Genetics are provided here courtesy of Dove Press

RESOURCES