Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2017 May 18;2017(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s13660-017-1391-2

On bounds involving k-Appell’s hypergeometric functions

Muhammad Uzair Awan 1,, Muhammad Aslam Noor 2,3, Marcela V Mihai 4, Khalida Inayat Noor 3
PMCID: PMC5437151  PMID: 28596696

Abstract

In this paper, we derive a new extension of Hermite-Hadamard’s inequality via k-Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals. Two new k-fractional integral identities are also derived. Then, using these identities as an auxiliary result, we obtain some new k-fractional bounds which involve k-Appell’s hypergeometric functions. These bounds can be viewed as new k-fractional estimations of trapezoidal and mid-point type inequalities. These results are obtained for the functions which have the harmonic convexity property. We also discuss some special cases which can be deduced from the main results of the paper.

Keywords: convex functions, harmonic convex functions, k-fractional, k-Appell’s hypergeometric functions, inequalities

Introduction and preliminaries

Convexity theory has played a pivotal role through its numerous applications in different fields of pure and applied sciences. In the past few years several new generalizations and extensions of classical convexity have been proposed in the literature, see [112]. Shi et al. [11] introduced the notion of harmonic convex sets as follows.

Definition 1.1

[11]

A set ΩR+ is said to be a harmonically convex set if

xytx+(1t)yΩ,x,yΩ,t[0,1].

Iscan [8] introduced the class of harmonic convex functions. The natural domain of harmonic convex functions is harmonic convex sets. Noor et al. [10] extended the definition of harmonic convex functions and defined a new generalization, which is called harmonic h-convex functions.

Definition 1.2

[10]

Let h:[0,1]JR be a real function. A function f:ΩR+R is said to be a harmonically h-convex function if

f(xytx+(1t)y)h(1t)f(x)+h(t)f(y),x,yI,t(0,1). 1.1

Remark 1.3

Note that, if h(t)=t,ts,ts,t1 and t=1, then the definition of harmonic h-convex functions reduces to the definitions of harmonic convex, harmonic s-convex, harmonic s-Godunova-Levin convex, harmonic Godunova-Levin and harmonic P-functions, respectively. Thus it is worth to mention here that the class of harmonic h-convex functions is quite unifying one as it naturally includes several other classes of harmonic convex functions.

Convexity theory has also a strong relationship with theory of inequalities, and resultantly many inequalities have been obtained via convex functions, see [6, 1315]. Interested readers may find the importance of generalized convexity to variational inequalities and multiple objective optimization in [1620]. One of the most extensively studied inequalities is Hermite-Hadamard’s inequality. This inequality was proved by Hermite and Hadamard independently. It provides a necessary and sufficient condition for a function to be convex. Dragomir et al. [6] has written a nice monograph on Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities. Interested readers may find very interesting and useful details about these inequalities in this monograph. Khattri [21] discussed some very interesting applications of Hermite-Hadamard’s inequality. Recently fractional calculus has attracted many researchers and thus become a powerful tool in many branches of mathematics. For some recent investigations in fractional calculus, see [22]. The classical form of Riemann-Liouville integrals is defined as follows.

Definition 1.4

[22]

Let fL1[a,b]. Then the Riemann-Liouville integrals Ja+αf and Jbαf of order α>0 with a0 are defined by

Ja+αf(x)=1Γ(α)ax(xt)α1f(t)dt,x>a, 1.2

and

Jbαf(x)=1Γ(α)xb(tx)α1f(t)dt,x<b, 1.3

where

Γ(α)=0etxα1dx,

is the well-known gamma function.

Sarikaya et al. [23] obtained Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities via Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals. Diaz et al. [24] introduced the generalized k-gamma function as

Γk(x)=limnn!kn(nk)xk1(x)n,k,k>0,xCkZ. 1.4

Γk is one parameter deformation of the classical gamma function as ΓkΓ when k1. Γk is based on the repeated appearance of the expression of

ϕ(ϕ+k)(ϕ+2k)(ϕ+3k)(ϕ+(n1)k).

This above statement is a function of the variable ϕ and is denoted by (ϕ)n,k. It is known as Pochhammer k-symbol, which reduces to classical Pochhammer symbol (ϕ)n by taking k=1. The integral of Γk is given by

Γk(x)=0tx1etkkdt,(x)>0. 1.5

It is evident from (1.5) that

Γk(x)=kxk1Γ(xk).

Diaz et al. [24] also defined a k-beta function as

βk(x,y)=Γk(x)Γk(y)Γk(x+y),(x)>0,(y)>0. 1.6

The integral form of a k-beta function is given by

βk(x,y)=1k01txk1(1t)xk1dt. 1.7

From (1.5) and (1.7) one can have

βk(x,y)=1kβ(xk,yk).

Using these definitions of k-gamma and k-beta functions, Mubeen et al. [25] introduced the k-Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of the type

Jαkf(x)=1kΓk(α)0x(xt)αk1f(t)dt,α>0,x>0,k>0. 1.8

It is obvious that when k1, the above definition reduces to classical Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals.

Sarikaya et al. [26] introduced the notion of k-Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals and discussed some of its interesting applications with respect to inequalities.

To be more precise, let f be piecewise continuous on I=(0,) and integrable on any finite subinterval of I=[0,]. Then, for t>0, we consider the k-Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of f of order α

Jaαkf(x)=1kΓk(α)ax(xt)αk1f(t)dt,x>a,k>0.

For more details, see [26]. Note that when k1, k-Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals become classical Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals. It is worth mentioning here that the notion of k-Riemann-Liouville fractional integral is the significant generalization of all above Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals. We would like to emphasize that for k1 the properties of k-Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals are quite different from those of classical Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals. Due to these facts, the k-Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals have important applications in several branches of pure and applied sciences, see [24, 26, 27].

The integral representation of k-Appell’s series F1,k, where k>0, is

F1,k=Γk(c)kΓk(a)Γk(ca)01tak1(1t)cak1(1kz1t)b1k(1kz2t)b2kdt.

For some more details, see [27].

Some new auxiliary results

In this section, we derive some new k-fractional identities which will serve as auxiliary results for the developments of our next results.

Lemma 2.1

Let f:I{0}R be differentiable on I such that fL[a,b], where a,bI with a<b, then

Tf(a,b;α,k;g)=ab(ba)201[tαk(1t)αk][ta+(1t)b]2f(abta+(1t)b)dt,

where

Tf(a,b;α,k;g)=f(a)+f(b)2Γk(α+k)2(abba)αk[kJ1b+α(fg)(1a)+kJ1aα(fg)(1b)].

Proof

It suffices to show that

Tf(a,b;α,k;g)=ab(ba)201[tαk(1t)αk][ta+(1t)b]2f(abta+(1t)b)dt=K1+K2. 2.1

Now integrating by parts yields

K1=ab(ba)201tαk[ta+(1t)b]2f(abta+(1t)b)dt=12[f(b)kΓk(α+k)k(abba)αk1kΓk(α)1b1a(1ax)αk1f(1x)dx]=f(b)2Γk(α+k)2(abba)αkkJ1b+α(fg)(1a). 2.2

Similarly

K2=ab(ba)201(1t)αk[ta+(1t)b]2f(abta+(1t)b)dt=f(a)2Γk(α+k)2(abba)αkkJ1aα(fg)(1b). 2.3

Combining (2.1), (2.2) and (2.3) completes the proof. □

Lemma 2.2

Under the assumptions of Lemma 2.1 and k=1, we have

Tf(a,b;α,1;g)=ab(ba)201tα(1t)α[ta+(1t)b]2f(abta+(1t)b)dt,

where

Tf(a,b;α,1;g)=f(a)+f(b)2Γ(α+1)2(abba)α[J1b+α(fg)(1a)+J1aα(fg)(1b)].

This is due to Iscan [8].

Lemma 2.3

Let f:I{0}R be differentiable on I such that fL[a,b], where a,bI with a<b, then

Mf(a,b;α,k;g)=12i=13Ii=12[ab(ba)0121[ta+(1t)b]2f(abta+(1t)b)dtab(ba)1211[ta+(1t)b]2f(abta+(1t)b)dtab(ba)01[(1t)αktαk]1[ta+(1t)b]2f(abta+(1t)b)dt],

where

Mf(a,b;α,k;g)=f(2aba+b)Γk(α+1)2(abba)αk{kJ1bα(fg)(1a)+kJ1a+α(fg)(1b)}.

Proof

Calculate I1, I2 and I3 as follows:

I1=ab(ba)0121[ta+(1t)b]2f(abta+(1t)b)dt=f(2aba+b)f(a). 2.4

Now

I2=ab(ba)1211[ta+(1t)b]2f(abta+(1t)b)dt=f(2aba+b)f(b). 2.5

Also

I3=ab(ba)01[(1t)αktαk]1[ta+(1t)b]2f(abta+(1t)b)dt=01[(1t)αktαk]df(abta+(1t)b)=01(1t)αkdf(abta+(1t)b)+01tαkdf(abta+(1t)b)=II+III. 2.6

Now consider

II=01(1t)αkdf(abta+(1t)b)=f(a)αk01(1t)αk1f(abta+(1t)b)dt.

Now suppose u=abta+(1t)b, then

II=f(a)αk(abba)αkab(1u1b)αk11u2f(u)du.

Again suppose u=1t, then

II=f(a)Γk(α+k)(abba)αkkJ1bα(fg)(1a). 2.7

Similarly

III=f(b)Γk(α+k)(abba)αkkJ1a+α(fg)(1b). 2.8

Using (2.7) and (2.8) in (2.6) and then adding the resultant with (2.4) and (2.5) completes the proof. □

Lemma 2.4

Under the assumptions of Lemma 2.3, if k1, we have

Mf(a,b;α,1;g)=12i=13Ii=12[ab(ba)0121[ta+(1t)b]2f(abta+(1t)b)dtab(ba)1211[ta+(1t)b]2f(abta+(1t)b)dtab(ba)01[(1t)αtα]1[ta+(1t)b]2f(abta+(1t)b)dt],

where

Mf(a,b;α,1;g)=f(2aba+b)Γ(α+1)2(abba)αk{J1bα(fg)(1a)+J1a+α(fg)(1b)}.

This result is due to Set et al. [28].

Results and discussions

In this section, we derive some new k-fractional integral inequalities.

Theorem 3.1

Let f:I{0}R be a harmonically h-convex function where a,bI with a<b. If fL[a,b], then, for h(12)0, we have

kαh(12)f(2aba+b)(abba)αkkΓk(α){kJ1aα(fg)(1b)+kJ1b+α(fg)(1a)}[f(a)+f(b)]01tαk1[h(1t)+h(t)]dt.

Proof

Since f is a harmonically h-convex function, so we have

f(2ab(1t)a+tb)h(12)[f(abta+(1t)b)+f(ab(1t)a+tb)].

Multiplying both sides of the above inequality by tαk1 and integrating it with respect to t on [0,1], we have

kαf(2aba+b)=f(2aba+b)01tαk1dth(12)[01tαk1f(abta+(1t)b)dt+01tαk1f(ab(1t)a+tb)dt]=h(12)(abba)αk{1b1a(x1b)αk1f(1x)dx+1b1a(1ax)αk1f(1x)dx}=h(12)(abba)αkkΓk(α){kJ1aα(fg)(1b)+kJ1b+α(fg)(1a)}.

This implies

kαh(12)f(2aba+b)(abba)αkkΓk(α){kJ1aα(fg)(1b)+kJ1b+α(fg)(1a)}. 3.1

Now

f(abta+(1t)b)h(1t)f(a)+h(t)f(b),f(ab(1t)a+tb)h(t)f(a)+h(1t)f(b).

Adding the above two inequalities and multiplying both sides by tαk1, we have

tαk1f(abta+(1t)b)+tαk1f(ab(1t)a+tb)tαk1[h(1t)+h(t)][f(a)+f(b)].

Integrating the above inequality with respect to t on [0,1], we have

(abba)αkkΓk(α){kJ1aα(fg)(1b)+kJ1b+α(fg)(1a)}[f(a)+f(b)]01tαk1[h(1t)+h(t)]dt. 3.2

Summing inequalities (3.1) and (3.2) completes the proof. □

We now discuss some special cases of Theorem 3.1.

I. If h(t)=t in Theorem 3.1, then we have the following new result.

Corollary 3.2

Let f:I{0}R be a harmonically convex function, where a,bI with a<b. If fL[a,b], then we have

2kαf(2aba+b)(abba)αkkΓk(α){kJ1aα(fg)(1b)+kJ1b+α(fg)(1a)}k[f(a)+f(b)]α.

II. If h(t)=ts in Theorem 3.1, then we have the following new result.

Corollary 3.3

Let f:I{0}R be a harmonically s-convex function, where a,bI with a<b. If fL[a,b], then we have

2skαf(2aba+b)(abba)αkkΓk(α){kJ1aα(fg)(1b)+kJ1b+α(fg)(1a)}[f(a)+f(b)](kBk(α,k(s+1))kα+ks).

III. If h(t)=ts in Theorem 3.1, then we have the following new result.

Corollary 3.4

Let f:I{0}R be a harmonically s-Godunova-Levin convex function, where a,bI with a<b. If fL[a,b], then, for α>ks, we have

k2sαf(2aba+b)(abba)αkkΓk(α){kJ1aα(fg)(1b)+kJ1b+α(fg)(1a)}[f(a)+f(b)](kBk(α,k(1s))kαks).

IV. If h(t)=1 in Theorem 3.1, then we have the following new result.

Corollary 3.5

Let f:I{0}R be a harmonic P-function, where a,bI with a<b. If fL[a,b], then we have

kαf(2aba+b)(abba)αkkΓk(α){kJ1aα(fg)(1b)+kJ1b+α(fg)(1a)}2k[f(a)+f(b)]α.

Now using the auxiliary results, we derive some trapezoidal and mid-point type inequalities.

Theorem 3.6

Assume that f:[0,1]R is a differentiable function such that |f|q is a harmonic convex function on [0,1]. Then

|Tf(a,b;α,k;g)|ab(ba)2I11qJ1q,

where

I=01|tαk(1t)αk|[ta+(1t)b]2dt=1b2(I112α/kI2+I3I4),

with

I1=kF1,k(k,α,2k,2k;12k,ba2bk);I2=kBk(α+k,1)F1,k(α+k,0,2k,α+k+1;0,ba2bk);I3=kBk(α+k,1)F1,k(α+k,0,2k,α+k+1;0,babk);I4=kBk(k,α+k)F1,k(k,0,2k,α+2k;0,babk),

and

J=01|tαk(1t)αk|[ta+(1t)b]2|f(abta+(1t)b)|qdt1b2[|f(a)|q(J112α/kJ2+J5J7)+|f(b)|q(12J312α/k+1J4+J6J8)],

with

J1=kBk(k,k)F1,k(k,αk,2k,2k;12k,ba2bk);J2=kBk(α+k,k)F1,k(α+k,k,2k,α+2k;12k,ba2bk);J3=kBk(2k,k)F1,k(2k,α,2k,3k;12k,ba2bk);J4=kBk(α+2k,k)F1,k(α+2k,0,2k,α+3k;0,ba2bk);J5=kBk(α+k,2k)F1,k(α+k,0,2k,α+3k;0,babk);J6=kBk(α+2k,k)F1,k(α+2k,0,2k,α+3k;0,babk);J7=kBk(k,α+2k)F1,k(k,0,2k,α+3k;0,babk);J8=kBk(2k,α+k)F1,k(2k,0,2k,α+3k;0,babk).

Proof

From Lemma 2.1, using the property of modulus and the power-mean inequality, we have

|Tf(a,b;α,k;g)|=|ab(ba)201[tαk(1t)αk][ta+(1t)b]2f(abta+(1t)b)dt|ab(ba)201|tαk(1t)αk|[ta+(1t)b]2|f(abta+(1t)b)|dtab(ba)2I11qJ1q,

where

I=01|tαk(1t)αk|[ta+(1t)b]2dt=201/2(1t)αktαk[ta+(1t)b]2dt+01tαk(1t)αk[ta+(1t)b]2dt=1b2[I1(12)αkI2+I3I4], 3.3

with

I1=01(1u2)αk(1ba2bu)2du=kF1,k(k,α,2k,2k;12k,ba2bk);I2=01uαk(1ba2bu)2duI2=kBk(α+k,1)F1,k(α+k,0,2k,α+k+1;0,ba2bk);I3=01tαk(1babt)2dtI3==kBk(α+k,1)F1,k(α+k,0,2k,α+k+1;0,babk);I4=01(1t)αk(1babt)2dt=kBk(k,α+k)F1,k(k,0,2k,α+2k;0,babk),

and using the harmonic convexity of |f|q, we have

J=01|tαk(1t)αk|[ta+(1t)b]2|f(abta+(1t)b)|qdt01|tαk(1t)αk|[ta+(1t)b]2[(1t)|f(a)|q+t|f(b)|q]dt=201/2(1t)αktαk[ta+(1t)b]2[(1t)|f(a)|q+t|f(b)|q]dt+01tαk(1t)αk[ta+(1t)b]2[(1t)|f(a)|q+t|f(b)|q]dt=01(1u2)αk(u2)αk[u2a+(1u2)b]2[(1u2)|f(a)|q+u2|f(b)|q]du+01tαk(1t)αk[ta+(1t)b]2[(1t)|f(a)|q+t|f(b)|q]dt=1b2[|f(a)|q(J112α/kJ2+J5J7)+|f(b)|q(12J312α/k+1J4+J6J8)], 3.4

with

J1=01(112u)αk+1(1ba2bu)2du=kBk(k,k)F1,k(k,αk,2k,2k;12k,ba2bk);J2=01uαk(112u)(1ba2bu)2duJ2=kBk(α+k,k)F1,k(α+k,k,2k,α+2k;12k,ba2bk);J3=01u(112u)αk(1ba2bu)2du=kBk(2k,k)F1,k(2k,α,2k,3k;12k,ba2bk);J4=01uαk+1(1ba2bu)2du=kBk(α+2k,k)F1,k(α+2k,0,2k,α+3k;0,ba2bk);J5=01tαk(1t)(1babt)2dt=kBk(α+k,2k)F1,k(α+k,0,2k,α+3k;0,babk);J6=01tαk+1(1babt)2dt=kBk(α+2k,k)F1,k(α+2k,0,2k,α+3k;0,babk);J7=01(1t)αk+1(1babt)2dt=kBk(k,α+2k)F1,k(k,0,2k,α+3k;0,babk);J8=01t(1t)αk(1babt)2dt=kBk(2k,α+k)F1,k(2k,0,2k,α+3k;0,babk),

and the proof is complete. □

Theorem 3.7

Assume that f:[0,1]R is a differentiable function such that |f|q is a harmonic convex function on [0,1]. Then

|Mf(a,b;α,k;g)|ab(ba)2(I11/qJ1/q+K11/qL1/q+M11/qN1/q),

where I is given by (3.3) , J is given by (3.4),

K=ab2(a+b),L|f(a)|q2b2kBk(k,k)F1,k(k,k,2k,2k;12k,ba2bk)L+|f(b)|q4b2kBk(2k,k)F1,k(2k,0,2k,3k;0,ba2bk),M=1b(a+b)

and

N|f(a)|q2b2[F1,k(k,0,2k,3k;0,babk)F1,k(k,k,2k,2k;12k,ba2bk)]+|f(b)|q2b2[F1,k(2k,0,2k,3k;0,babk)14F1,k(2k,0,2k,3k;0,babk)].

Proof

From Lemma 2.3, using the property of modulus and the power-mean inequality, we have

|Mf(a,b;α,k;g)|ab(ba)2[01|(1t)αktαk|[ta+(1t)b]2|f(abta+(1t)b)|dt+0121[ta+(1t)b]2|f(abta+(1t)b)|dt+1211[ta+(1t)b]2|f(abta+(1t)b)|dt]ab(ba)2(I11/qJ1/q+K11/qL1/q+M11/qN1/q),

where

K=0121[ta+(1t)b]2dt=ab2(a+b),

and

L=0121[ta+(1t)b]2[|f(abta+(1t)b)|]qdt0121[ta+(1t)b]2[(1t)|f(a)|q+t|f(b)|q]dt,

and using the change of variables, we have

L12b2|f(a)|q01(112u)(1uba2b)2duL+14b2|f(b)|q01u(1uba2b)2duL=|f(a)|q2b2kBk(k,k)F1,k(k,k,2k,2k;12k,ba2bk)L+|f(b)|q4b2kBk(2k,k)F1,k(2k,0,2k,3k;0,ba2bk),M=1211[ta+(1t)b]2dt=1b(a+b),

and

N=1211[ta+(1t)b]2[|f(abta+(1t)b)|]qdt=011[ta+(1t)b]2[|f(abta+(1t)b)|]qdt0121[ta+(1t)b]2[|f(abta+(1t)b)|]qdt1b201(1tbab)2[(1t)|f(a)|q+t|f(b)|q]dt1b2012(1tbab)2[(1t)|f(a)|q+t|f(b)|q]dt=|f(a)|qb2[01(1t)(1tbab)2dt012(1t)(1tbab)2dt]+|f(b)|qb2[01t(1tbab)2dt012t(1tbab)2dt]=|f(a)|q2b2[F1,k(k,0,2k,3k;0,babk)F1,k(k,k,2k,2k;12k,babk)]+|f(b)|q2b2[F1,k(2k,0,2k,3k;0,babk)14F1,k(2k,0,2k,3k;0,ba2bk)].

This completes the proof. □

Conclusion

A new refinement of Hermite-Hadamard’s inequality via k-Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals is obtained. We have derived two new k-fractional integral identities. Utilizing these identities, we have derived some new k-fractional bounds which involve k-Appell’s hypergeometric functions via the functions which have the harmonic convexity property. It is expected that the ideas and techniques of this article may be useful for future research.

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions. Authors are pleased to acknowledge the support of Distinguished Scientist Fellowship Program (DSFP), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Footnotes

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

MUA, MAN, MVM and KIN worked jointly. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Muhammad Uzair Awan, Email: awan.uzair@gmail.com.

Muhammad Aslam Noor, Email: noormaslam@ksu.edu.sa.

Marcela V Mihai, Email: marcelamihai58@yahoo.com.

Khalida Inayat Noor, Email: khalidanoor@hotmail.com.

References

  • 1.Breckner WW. Stetigkeitsaussagen für eine Klasse verallgemeinerter konvexer funktionen in topologischen linearen Raumen. Pupl. Inst. Math. 1978;23:13–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cristescu G, Lupsa L. Non-connected Convexities and Applications. Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cristescu G, Noor MA, Awan MU. Bounds of the second degree cumulative frontier gaps of functions with generalized convexity. Carpath. J. Math. 2015;31(2):173–180. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Dragomir, SS: Inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type for h-convex functions on linear spaces. RGMIA Res. Rep. Coll., Article ID 72 (2013)
  • 5.Dragomir SS, Pečarić J, Persson LE. Some inequalities of Hadamard type. Soochow J. Math. 1995;21:335–341. [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Dragomir, SS, Pearce, CEM: Selected Topics on Hermite-Hadamard Inequalities and Applications. Victoria University Australia (2000)
  • 7. Godunova, EK, Levin, VI: Neravenstva dlja funkcii sirokogo klassa, soderzascego vypuklye, monotonnye i nekotorye drugie vidy funkii. Vycislitel. Mat. i. Fiz. Mezvuzov. Sb. Nauc. Trudov, MGPI, Moskva., 138-142 (1985) (in Russian)
  • 8.Iscan I. Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for harmonically convex functions. Hacet. J. Math. Stat. 2014;43(6):935–942. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Noor MA, Noor KI, Awan MU. Integral inequalities for coordinated harmonically convex functions. Complex Var. Elliptic Equ. 2015;60(6):776–786. doi: 10.1080/17476933.2014.976814. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Noor MA, Noor KI, Awan MU, Costache S. Some integral inequalities for harmonically h-convex functions. UPB Sci. Bull., Series A. 2015;77(1):5–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shi H-N, Zhang J. Some new judgement theorems of Schur geometric and Schur harmonic convexities for a class of symmetric functions. J. Inequal. Appl. 2013;2013 doi: 10.1186/1029-242X-2013-527. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Varočanec S. On h-convexity. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2007;326:303–311. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.02.086. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Iscan I. Hermite-Hadamard and Simpson-like type inequalities for differentiable harmonically convex functions. J. Math. 2014;2014 doi: 10.1155/2014/346305. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mihai MV, Noor MA, Noor KI, Awan MU. Some integral inequalities for h-convex functions involving hypergeometric functions. Appl. Math. Comput. 2015;252(1):257–262. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2014.12.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Park J. Hermite-Hadamard-like and Simpson-like type inequalities for harmonically convex functions. Int. J. Math. Anal. 2014;8(27):1321–1337. doi: 10.12988/ijma.2014.45136. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Antczak T, Pitea A. Parametric approach to multitime multiobjective fractional variational problems under (F,ρ)-convexity. Optim. Control Appl. Methods. 2016;37(5):831–847. doi: 10.1002/oca.2192. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pitea A, Antczak T. Proper efficiency and duality for a new class of nonconvex multitime multiobjective variational problems. J. Inequal. Appl. 2014;2014 doi: 10.1186/1029-242X-2014-333. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pitea A, Postolache M. Duality theorems for a new class of multitime multiobjective variational problems. J. Glob. Optim. 2012;54(1):47–58. doi: 10.1007/s10898-011-9740-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pitea A, Postolache M. Minimization of vectors of curvilinear functionals on the second order jet bundle. Necessary conditions. Optim. Lett. 2012;6(3):459–470. doi: 10.1007/s11590-010-0272-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pitea A, Postolache M. Minimization of vectors of curvilinear functionals on the second order jet bundle. Sufficient efficiency conditions. Optim. Lett. 2012;6(8):1657–1669. doi: 10.1007/s11590-011-0357-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Khattri SK. Three proofs of the inequality e<(1+1n)n+0.5. Am. Math. Mon. 2010;117(3):273–277. doi: 10.4169/000298910x480126. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kilbas A, Srivastava HM, Trujillo JJ. Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sarikaya MZ, Set E, Yaldiz H, Basak N. Hermite-Hadamard’s inequalities for fractional integrals and related fractional inequalities. Math. Comput. Model. 2013;57:2403–2407. doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2011.12.048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Diaz R. On hypergeometric functions and Pochhammer k-symbol. Divulg. Mat. 2007;2:179–192. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mubeen S, Habibullah GM. k-fractional integrals and applications. Int. J. Contemp. Math. Sci. 2012;7(2):89–94. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sarikaya MZ, Karaca A. On the k-Riemann-Liouville fractional integral and applications. Int. J. Math. Stat. 2014;1(3):33–43. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mubeen S, Iqbal S, Rahman G. Contiguous function relations and an integral representation for Appell k-series F1,k. Inter. J. Math. Research. 2015;4(2):53–63. doi: 10.18488/journal.24/2015.4.2/24.2.53.63. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Set E, Iscan I, Zehir F. On some new inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type involving harmonically convex functions via fractional integrals. Konuralp J. Math. 2015;3(1):42–55. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Inequalities and Applications are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES