Skip to main content
Plant Signaling & Behavior logoLink to Plant Signaling & Behavior
. 2017 Mar 24;12(4):e1307494. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2017.1307494

Polymorphic responses of Medicago truncatula accessions to potassium deprivation

Kevin Garcia a, Jean-Michel Ané a,b,
PMCID: PMC5437819  PMID: 28340327

ABSTRACT

Potassium (K+) is an essential macronutrient for plants and the most abundant cation in cells. Due to variable K+ availability in the environment, plants must be able to adjust their developmental, physiological and transcriptional responses. The plant development to K+ deprivation was not well studied in legumes thus far. We recently described the first adaptation mechanisms of the model legume Medicago truncatula Jemalong A17 to long-term K+ deprivation and analyzed these responses in the context of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Here we report polymorphic growth variations of two genetically very different accessions of M. truncatula to K+-limiting conditions, Jemalong A17, and the Tunisian accession Tn11.1. The faster adaptation of Tn11.1 than A17 to K+ shortage might be due to its greater adaptation to saline soils. Examining in a more systematic way the developmental adaptation of various M. truncatula accessions to K+ deprivation will provide a better understanding of how legume evolved to cope with this stressful condition.

KEYWORDS: Development, legumes, Medicago truncatula, potassium, reactive oxygen species


Potassium (K+) supply for crops is becoming an emerging issue in agriculture due to the constant increase of K+-deprived soils.1 Because this cation is involved in many growth and developmental processes,2,3 plants evolved various strategies to cope with K+ deprivation, including developmental adjustments, the expression of high-affinity transporters, and associations with beneficial microbes.4,5 Exploring natural variation of low K+ responses will help to understand, manage and possibly optimize these strategies for sustainable agricultural practices.6 Legumes are important crops for food and feed due to their high protein content, but also due to their ability to enrich soils with nitrogen. Studies investigating the adaptation of legumes to K+ deficient conditions are still limited. Also, although well characterized in Arabidopsis, the developmental adaptations to K+ deprivation and the genotypic variations of these responses are still unknown in legumes.7-10 In a recent study, we started filling this gap by describing for the first time the physiological and transcriptional adaptations of the model legume Medicago truncatula Jemalong A17 to long-term K+ deprivation, and by evaluating how the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis modulates these responses.11

In this report, we describe the shoot and root development of two genetically different accessions of M. truncatula and quantified the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by their roots in response to short-term K+ deprivation. Jemalong A17 and Tunisian Tn11.1 accessions were acid-scarified, surface sterilized and grown on K+-sufficient (3.75 mM) or K+-free (0.00 mM) solid Long Ashton medium for 2 weeks. Shoot and root fresh weights, and the number of lateral roots were determined for each accession (Fig. 1). Both accessions displayed a significant reduction of shoot fresh weight under K+-free condition (Fig. 1A). However, only Tn11.1 displayed a root phenotype to short-term K+ deprivation: a reduced root fresh weight (Fig. 1B), and a higher number of lateral roots per plant were observed at low K+ (Fig. 1C). ROS production was also examined in roots using carboxy-H2DFFDA as described in Garcia et al.11 Both accessions produced significantly more ROS when K+ was removed from the medium (Fig. 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Developmental response of A17 and Tn11.1 Medicago truncatula accessions under potassium deprivation. After 2 weeks of culture on agar medium supplemented (+K, 3.75 mM of K+) or not (-K, 0.00 mM of K+) with K+, shoot (A), and root (B) fresh weights, and the number of lateral roots (C) were determined. n = 34 (**: P < 0.01).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production of A17 and Tn11.1 Medicago truncatula accessions under potassium deprivation. After 2 weeks of culture on agar medium supplemented (+K, 3.75 mM of K+) or not (-K, 0.00 mM of K+) with K+, the ROS production was visualized in the roots after incubation with carboxyH2DFFDA as described by Garcia et al..11 Quantified data from root tip images taken from 7–8 plants per condition. (*: P < 0.05; **: P < 0.01).

These data revealed that A17 and Tn11.1 did not respond similarly to K+ deprivation. Indeed, Tn11.1 plants were able to modify their root architecture much more rapidly than A17 to cope efficiently with K+ deprivation, particularly by increasing the number of lateral roots. Interestingly, Tn11.1 belongs to a Tunisian population of M. truncatula well adapted to saline soils.12 This trait could explain why Tn11.1 adapted faster to K+ stress in our experiment. Indeed, because K+ and sodium (Na+) ions are physicochemically very similar, low K+ availability often enhances the uptake of Na+ by roots.13 Although Na+ can be moderately taken up by plants, it rapidly reaches toxic levels and inhibits enzymatic reactions that normally require K+, resulting in deleterious and irreversible effects.14 As a consequence, it is likely that the better tolerance of Tn11.1 to elevated Na+ conditions might offer a more efficient and rapid adaptation to K+ deprivation than with A17. It is also worth mentioning that the weight of A17 roots did not change during this short period of complete K+ removal, whereas we observed a reduction of root biomass when plants were grown for 6-weeks under the low K+ regime.11 Although it is very hard to compare both experiments due to important technical differences, the developmental effect of K+ deprivation on A17 roots might be detectable only after a more prolonged stress period, suggesting a slower adaptive behavior of this accession than Tn11.1 to K+ deprivation again.

Describing these polymorphic responses to K+ deprivation between two genetically distinct M. truncatula accessions paves the way for developing genome-wide association studies involving larger populations. Linking these phenotypical traits to genetic variations will help to decipher the molecular responses of M. truncatula to low K+ condition, and optimize the varietal selection of legumes to face with nutrient limitations. Moreover, investigating the impact of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis on physiological and transcriptional responses to K+ deprivation in various M. truncatula accessions will allow understanding how the genetic background of the host affects the mycorrhiza-dependent K+ acquisition. These studies might also be accompanied by computational cell biology simulations of the arbuscular mycorrhizal system to pinpoint the contributions of the different entities.15

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Funding

K.G. was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF-IOS#1331098) to J.M.A.

References

  • 1.Zörb C, Senbayram M, Peiter E. Potassium in agriculture - status and perspectives. J Plant Physiol 2014; 171:656-69; PMID:24140002; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jplph.2013.08.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wang Y, Wu WH. Potassium transport and signaling in higher plants. Ann Rev Plant Biol 2013; 64:451-76; PMID:23330792; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Anschütz U, Becker D, Shabala S. Going beyond nutrition: regulation of potassium homeostasis as a common denominator of plant adaptive responses to environment. J Plant Physiol 2014; 171:670-87; PMID:24635902; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jplph.2014.01.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Schachtman DP, Shin R. Nutrient sensing and signaling: NPKS. Ann Rev Plant Biol 2007; 58:47-69; PMID:17067284; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1146/annurev.arplant.58.032806.103750 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Garcia K, Zimmermann SD. The role of mycorrhizal associations in plant potassium nutrition. Front Plant Sci 2014; 5:1-9; PMID:25101097; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3389/fpls.2014.00337 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shin R. Strategies for improving potassium use efficiency in plants. Mol Cells 2014; 37:575-84; PMID:24938230; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.14348/molcells.2014.0141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Armengaud P, Breitling R, Amtmann A. The potassium-dependent transcriptome of Arabidopsis reveals a prominent role of jasmonic acid in nutrient signaling. Plant Physiol 2004; 136:2556-76; PMID:15347784; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1104/pp.104.046482 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shin R, Schachtman DP. Hydrogen peroxide mediates plant root cell response to nutrient deprivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101:8827-32; PMID:15173595; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.0401707101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Alemán F, Nieves-Cordones M, Martínez V, Rubio F. Root K+ acquisition in plants: the Arabidopsis thaliana model. Plant Cell Physiol 2011; 52:1603-12; PMID:21771865; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/pcp/pcr096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kellermeier F, Chardon F, Amtmann A. Natural variation of Arabidopsis root architecture reveals complementing adaptive strategies to potassium starvation. Plant Physiol 2013; 161:1421-32; PMID:23329148; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1104/pp.112.211144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Garcia K, Chasman D, Roy S, Ané JM. Physiological responses and gene co-expression network of mycorrhizal roots under K+ deprivation. Plant Physiol 2017; 173(3):1811-23; PMID:28159827; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1104/pp.16.01959 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Friesen ML, von Wettberg EJB, Badri M, Moriuchi KS, Barhoumi F, Chang PL, Cuellar-Ortiz S, Cordeiro MA, Vu WT, Arraouadi S, et al.. The ecological genomic basis of salinity adaptation in Tunisian Medicago truncatula. BMC Genomics 2014; 15:1160; PMID:25534372; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Benito B, Haro R, Amtmann A, Cuin TA, Dreyer I. The twins K+ and Na+ in plants. J Plant Physiol 2014; 171:723-31; PMID:24810769; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jplph.2013.10.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Maathuis FJM, Ahmad I, Patishtan J. Regulation of Na+ fluxes in plants. Front Plant Sci 2014; 5:467; PMID:25278946; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3389/fpls.2014.00467 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Schott S, Valdebenito B, Bustos D, Gomez-Porras JL, Sharma T, Dreyer I. Cooperation through competition-dynamics and microeconomics of a minimal nutrient trade system in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Front Plant Sci 2016; 7:912; PMID:27446142; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3389/fpls.2016.00912 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Signaling & Behavior are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES