Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1990 Aug;87(15):5749–5753. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.15.5749

Female copying increases the variance in male mating success.

M J Wade 1, S G Pruett-Jones 1
PMCID: PMC54405  PMID: 2377613

Abstract

Theoretical models of sexual selection assume that females choose males independently of the actions and choice of other individual females. Variance in male mating success in promiscuous species is thus interpreted as a result of phenotypic differences among males which females perceive and to which they respond. Here we show that, if some females copy the behavior of other females in choosing mates, the variance in male mating success and therefore the opportunity for sexual selection is greatly increased. Copying behavior is most likely in non-resource-based harem and lek mating systems but may occur in polygynous, territorial systems as well. It can be shown that copying behavior by females is an adaptive alternative to random choice whenever there is a cost to mate choice. We develop a statistical means of estimating the degree of female copying in natural populations where it occurs.

Full text

PDF
5749

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. CROW J. F. Some possibilities for measuring selection intensities in man. Hum Biol. 1958 Feb;30(1):1–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Clutton-Brock T. H., Hiraiwa-Hasegawa M., Robertson A. Mate choice on fallow deer leks. Nature. 1989 Aug 10;340(6233):463–465. doi: 10.1038/340463a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kiester A. R., Slatkin M. A strategy of movement and resource utilization. Theor Popul Biol. 1974 Aug;6(1):1–20. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(74)90028-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lande R. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jun;78(6):3721–3725. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.6.3721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lill A. Social organization and space utilization in the lek-forming white-bearded manakin, M. manacus trinitatis Hartert. Z Tierpsychol. 1974;36:513–530. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1974.tb02136.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Payne R. B., Payne K. Social organization and mating success in local song populations of village indigobirds, Vidua chalybeata. Z Tierpsychol. 1977 Oct;45(2):113–173. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1977.tb02115.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pomiankowski A. The costs of choice in sexual selection. J Theor Biol. 1987 Sep 21;128(2):195–218. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(87)80169-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES