ERRATUM
Volume 30, no. 4, p. 1004–1017, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00640-09. Page 1007, Fig. 1D: The anti-F1 control immunoblot was inadvertently duplicated. The correct anti-F1 blot from the original experiment is shown below. This is the monomeric form of mitochondrial F1F0 ATPase (complex V) as a loading control.
Page 1007, Fig. 1E: The anti-F1 immunoblot was inadvertently a duplicate of the control blot in Fig. 5A. Therefore, we redid the Fig. 1E study using the original samples from 2009. The resulting images are shown below.
Page 1008, Fig. 2C, lanes 5 and 6: The anti-F1 immunoblot was a duplicate of the blot in Fig. 1D. The original samples were rerun, and the correct anti-Myc and anti-F1 blots are shown below.
Page 1011, Fig. 5A, lanes 3 and 4: The anti-F1 blot was a duplicate of the control in Fig. 1E, as mentioned above. We reran the original samples, and the correct anti-Myc and anti-F1 blots for Coa1-Myc samples from wild-type (WT) and cox10Δ cells are shown below.
We regret these errors, but they do not affect the interpretation of the experiments and the conclusions of the study.