Skip to main content
Journal of Experimental Botany logoLink to Journal of Experimental Botany
. 2017 Feb 1;68(5):1213–1224. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw496

Cold acclimation alters DNA methylation patterns and confers tolerance to heat and increases growth rate in Brassica rapa

Tongkun Liu 1, Ying Li 1, Weike Duan 1, Feiyi Huang 1, Xilin Hou 1,*,
PMCID: PMC5441862  PMID: 28158841

Highlight

Changes in DNA methylation contribute to cross-adaptation in cold-acclimated Brassica rapa, which has elevated organic acids and increased photosynthesis, and confers tolerance to heat and enhances growth rate.

Keywords: Brassica rapa, cold acclimation, DNA methylation, heat tolerance, organic acids, photosynthesis.

Abstract

Epigenetic modifications are implicated in plant adaptations to abiotic stresses. Exposure of plants to one stress can induce resistance to other stresses, a process termed cross-adaptation, which is not well understood. In this study, we aimed to unravel the epigenetic basis of elevated heat-tolerance in cold-acclimated Brassica rapa by conducting a genome-wide DNA methylation analysis of leaves from control (CK) and cold-acclimated (CA) plants. We found that both methylation and demethylation occurred during cold acclimation. Two significantly altered pathways, malate dehydrogenase activity and carbon fixation, and 1562 differentially methylated genes, including BramMDH1, BraKAT2, BraSHM4, and Bra4CL2, were identified in CA plants. Genetic validation and treatment of B. rapa with 5-aza-2-deoxycytidine (Aza) suggested that promoter demethylation of four candidate genes increased their transcriptional activities. Physiological analysis suggested that elevated heat-tolerance and high growth rate were closely related to increases in organic acids and photosynthesis, respectively. Functional analyses demonstrated that the candidate gene BramMDH1 (mMDH: mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase) directly enhances organic acids and photosynthesis to increase heat-tolerance and growth rate in Arabidopsis. However, Aza-treated B. rapa, which also has elevated BramMDH1 levels, did not exhibit enhanced heat-tolerance. We therefore suggest that DNA demethylation alone is not sufficient to increase heat-tolerance. This study demonstrates that altered DNA methylation contributes to cross-adaptation.

Introduction

Exposure of plants to a moderate stress can induce resistance to other stresses, a phenomenon termed cross-adaptation. This is an aspect of environmental physiology that has not been explored extensively. Low temperature is a major environmental stress that seriously compromises plant development, distribution, and productivity. Many plants exhibit increased freezing tolerance upon exposure to low, non-freezing temperatures, a process known as cold acclimation. This is a complex process that involves many changes, ranging from changes in gene expression to those in physiological, biochemical, and metabolic processes (Chinnusamy et al., 2007; Hua, 2009; Medina et al., 2011; Knight and Knight, 2012; Shi et al., 2015). These include changes in SFR6 and CBF gene expression (Fowler and Thomashow, 2002; Knight et al., 2009; Jia et al., 2016; Zhao et al., 2016), photosynthesis (Allen and Ort, 2001), and the stability of membranes and the cytoskeleton (Nishida and Murata, 1996; Thalhammer and Hincha, 2014), as well as metabolic adjustments including the production of hormones (Barrero-Gil et al., 2016) and organic acids (Nagler et al., 2015). During cold acclimation, the suppression of photosynthesis and photosynthetic gene expression is removed in Arabidopsis leaves (Strand et al., 1997). Cold acclimation also increases cytoplasmic volume, accompanying increases in the activities of enzymes in the Calvin cycle and in the sucrose biosynthesis pathway (Strand et al., 1999). In addition, elevated levels of organic acids (alpha-ketoglutarate, fumarate, malate, and citrate) have been detected in cold-acclimated Arabidopsis (Nagler et al., 2015; Dyson et al., 2016). However, the mechanisms by which plants sense low temperatures and subsequently adjust photosynthesis and metabolism remain to be determined.

Interestingly, after cold acclimation, plants can exhibit increased resistance not only to freezing but also to heat stress (Palta et al., 1981; Fu et al., 1998). For example, in winter rye, cold acclimation increases plant heat tolerance; this is not attributable to elevated heat-shock proteins, which are not induced by cold acclimation and therefore are not involved in the increased heat tolerance observed. However, a number of heat-stable proteins, sugars, and long-chain carbohydrate polymers accumulate during the cold acclimation process and may play roles in increased heat tolerance as well as freezing tolerance (Fu et al., 1998). In potato, 15 d at 5/2 °C day/night increased both heat- and freezing-stress resistance in Solanum commersonii and other species capable of cold acclimation (Palta et al., 1981). However, there is limited understanding of the molecular and biochemical mechanisms that confer enhanced heat tolerance in cold-acclimated plants.

Epigenetic regulation can play an important role in plant adaptation to abiotic stresses (Chinnusamy and Zhu, 2009). For instance, drought-induced expression of stress-responsive genes is associated with an increase in H3K4 trimethylation and H3K9 acetylation in Arabidopsis (Kim et al., 2008). In tobacco, aluminum, paraquat, salt, and cold stresses have been found to induce DNA demethylation in the coding sequence of the NtGPDL gene (Choi and Sano, 2007). In addition, previous experiments have shown that cold acclimation can change DNA methylation levels in Cannabis sativa (Mayer et al., 2015). Alterations in DNA methylation in Celtis bungeana have also been found to occur over periods of chilling and freezing (Song et al., 2015). All of these results indicate that epigenetic changes, such as DNA methylation or demethylation, may occur in cold-acclimated plants.

In plant genomes, DNA methylation can occur either symmetrically at cytosines in both CG and CHG (H = A, T, or C) contexts or asymmetrically in a CHH context (Vanyushin and Ashapkin, 2011). Methylated DNA immunoprecipitation sequencing (MeDIP-seq) is a cost-effective method for studying whole-genome DNA methylation based on immunoprecipitation. The MeDIP-seq approach employs an antibody against 5-methylcytosine or methyl-binding domain proteins to capture methylated DNA, which is subsequently subjected to next-generation sequencing (Zhao et al., 2014). Bok choy (also known as pak choi), which is a variety of Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa ssp. chinensis L.) without heads, is an important vegetable in the middle and lower Yangtze region of China and in other Asian countries (http://nhccbase.njau.edu.cn/website/). In our previous research, we found that cold-acclimated bok choy also displayed increased heat tolerance and a high growth rate. To better understand the molecular and biochemical mechanisms of cross-adaptation that confer enhanced heat tolerance to cold-acclimated bok choy, in this study we characterized genome-wide DNA methylation patterns in control and cold-acclimated bok choy leaves using MeDIP-seq. Genetic validation and treatment with the DNA methylation inhibitor 5-aza-2-deoxycytidine (Aza) were used to study the causal link between changes in DNA methylation and gene expression on the one hand and physiological changes on the other hand. Physiological and molecular analyses were used to obtain a thorough understanding of the regulation of cross-adaptation. In addition, the function of the candidate gene BramMDH1 is further discussed.

Materials and methods

Plant material and growth conditions

‘NHCC004’ is a cold-acclimated bok choy (B. rapa ssp. chinensis L.) cultivar and was used for the experiments. Plants were grown in pots containing a soil:vermiculite mixture (3:1) in the greenhouse of Nanjing Agricultural University in China, and the controlled-environment growth chamber maintained cycles of 16 h of light (approximately 300 μmol photons m–2 s–1) at 23 °C and 8 h of dark at 18 °C. For cold acclimation (CA) treatment, 40-d-old plants were transferred for an additional 2 weeks to a 4 °C growth cabinet under a 16-h day-length at 150 μmol photons m–2 s–1, then transferred back to greenhouse conditions for 1 week of recovery. For the control (CK) treatment, 40-d-old plants were transferred to a low-light (150 μmol photons m–2 s–1) chamber for 3 d at 16 h/23 °C light, 8 h/18 °C dark, then transferred back to greenhouse conditions for 1 week of recovery. After treatment, the third fully expanded leaf from the top of the plant was collected, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C for subsequent analysis.

For 5-aza-2-deoxycytidine (Aza) treatment, B. rapa seeds were germinated on Linsmaier and Skoog (LS) medium (Caisson Labs) plates containing 20 μM Aza (Sigma-Aldrich) and were grown for 15 d before measurement.

DNA preparation and MeDIP-seq

DNA from leaves of CK and CA plants was isolated using a Universal Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (TaKaRa, Japan). About 50 ng per sample of purified DNA was then sent to the Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China) for MeDIP-seq analysis by Illumina HiSeq 2000 (Illumina Inc., CA, USA). Data filtering included removing adapter sequences, contamination, and low-quality reads from among the raw reads. All 49-bp clean reads were mapped to the B. rapa genome [downloaded from the Brassica database (BRAD) version 1.5; http://brassicadb.org/brad/]. Only unique alignments with no more than two mismatches were considered for further analysis by SOAP2.21 (http://soap.genomics.org.cn). Whole-genome peak scanning was based on a defined analysis model using MACS 1.4.0 (http://liulab.dfci.harvard.edu/MACS/) with a cut-off P-value of 1 × 10–4 to exclude false-positive peaks or noise. Peaks of CK and CA samples were merged as candidate differentially methylated regions (DMRs) using MACS 1.4.0 (P-value ≤0.01 and at least a 2-fold change in sequence counts). For each candidate DMR, the number of reads for each sample was calculated. Then, numbers of reads were assessed with chi-square statistics and false-discovery rate (FDR) statistics to identify true DMRs. Methylated regions were deemed significantly differentially methylated across CK and CA samples with a P-value <0.05, FDR <0.05, and at least a 2-fold change in sequence counts. Genes that were significantly differentially methylated (DMGs) were used for gene ontology (GO) analysis and KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) pathway analysis.

Bisulfite sequencing PCR (BSP) analysis

Genomic bisulfite sequencing was performed to confirm DNA methylation levels. Genomic DNA was extracted from CK and CA cells using a Universal Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Takara, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and 500 ng genomic DNA was treated with sodium bisulfite using the EZ DNA Methylation-Gold Kit (Zymo Research, Orange, CA, USA). Primers, which were designed using the MethPrimer program (http://www.urogene.org/cgi-bin/methprimer/methprimer.cgi), are shown in Supplementary Table S1 at JXB online. Then, the BSP products were cloned into a pMD19-T simple vector (Takara, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For each line and each gene, ten positive clones were randomly selected for subsequent sequencing. After this, the amplicon sequence data were aligned to the B. rapa reference genome, and the extent of methylation (methylation level) was calculated by dividing all CpGs analyzed by the total number of methylated CpGs detected.

Analysis of gene expression

Leaf samples (500 mg) were ground in liquid nitrogen. RNA extraction and first-strand cDNA synthesis were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions using the Qiagen RNeasy Kit and SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). Data were collected at 72 °C in each cycle, and the expression levels of genes were calculated with iQ5 optical system software version 2.0 using BraGAPDH (Bra016729) as the reference gene. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis included three biological replicates. RT-PCR primer sequences are shown in Supplementary Table S1. Products of qPCR were sequenced for accuracy.

Gas exchange parameters

The net photosynthetic rate (PN) and dark respiration rate (Rd) of the fully expanded leaves (the third leaves from the top of the plant) were measured using a portable photosynthesis system (LI-6400, LI-COR Inc., USA). Leaf temperatures were maintained at 23 °C. Relative humidity in the assimilation chamber was maintained at 60–70%, the external CO2 concentration was maintained at 400 ± 10 μmol mol–1, and the light intensity was maintained at 1000 μmol photons m–2 s–1.

Chlorophyll content, biomass, and organic acids measurements

Leaf chlorophyll (Chl) content was measured using a hand-held Chl meter (SPAD-502Plus, Minolta Corp., Spectrum Technologies, Inc.). The measurement points were randomly selected on the third fully developed leaves from the top of the plant, and three points were selected on each leaf (Richardson et al., 2002).

For biomass analysis, leaves from the plant were harvested. The dry weight (DW) was determined after drying the leaves at 80 °C for 2 d.

For organic acids analysis, a 0.5-g leaf sample was collected and frozen in liquid nitrogen for organic acid extraction as described previously (Johnson et al., 1996). The organic acids content was measured according to the method of Tesfaye et al. (2001) in 25 μl of extraction sample. All analyses included three independent replicates.

Generation of transgenic Arabidopsis

To generate the minigene constructs (pBramMDH1:HA-BramMDH1, pBraKAT2:HA-BraKAT2, pBraSHM4:HA-BraSHM4, and pBra4CL2:HA-Bra4CL2) we first cloned the full-length cDNA into the pENTR/D-TOPO vector (Invitrogen) to make the gene fusion in-frame with the HA sequence (primer sequences are shown in Supplementary Table S1). Then, the BramMDH1 (A06: 662305–664304), BraKAT2 (A05: 5994734–5996733), BraSHM4 (A04: 5303170–5305169), and Bra4CL2 (A05: 17253035–17255034) promoter regions (primer sequences are shown in Supplementary Table S1) were cloned into the pENTR 5′-TOPO vector (Invitrogen). After the sequences were verified, both the HA cDNA and the gene promoter were transferred into the R4pGWB501 vector using multiple Gateway reactions to generate the pBramMDH1:HA-BramMDH1, pBraKAT2:HA-BraKAT2, pBraSHM4:HA-BraSHM4, and pBra4CL2:HA-Bra4CL2 binary vectors. These constructs were introduced into Arabidopsis (Col-0 and met1) plants using Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation (strain ABI) with the floral dip method (Clough and Bent, 1998). Primary transformants (seedlings) were screened on Linsmaier and Skoog (LS) medium (Caisson) supplemented with 10 μg mL–1 hygromycin (Sigma-Aldrich). Stable transgenic plants (T3) were used in the study.

To generate the 35S:HA-BramMDH1/Col-0 lines, the full-length sequence of BramMDH1 was inserted into the pEarleyGate201 vector with HA tag by Gateway LR recombination (Invitrogen). This construct was used to transform A. tumefaciens strain ABI and then Arabidopsis plants (Col-0) using Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation via floral dip. Transgenic lines were selected on LS plates containing 16 μg mL–1 Basta. A T3 line was used for further analysis.

Accession numbers

Brassica rapa accession numbers used in this study are from the Brassica database (http://brassicadb.org/brad/).

Results

Global mapping of DNA methylation

In total, 51 020 408 clean reads were acquired from the MeDIP-seq analysis of the CK and CA samples. Over 76% of the CK reads were mapped, and 30% of the CK reads were uniquely mapped to the B. rapa genome, while for the CA samples, 79% and 32% of reads were mapped and uniquely mapped, respectively (Table 1). Uniquely mapped reads were detected on all chromosomes (see Supplementary Fig. S1). When identifying global DNA methylation patterns, the number of methylated peaks detected by MeDIP-seq is important (Hu et al., 2013). We obtained 19 001 and 19 589 methylated peaks in the CK and CA samples, respectively, covering approximately 10.19% and 10.47%, respectively, of the B. rapa genome (Supplementary Table S2).

Table 1.

Summary of MeDIP-seq Illumina data mapped to the Brassica rapa genome

Sample Total reads Mapped reads Mapping rate (%) Unique mapped read Unique mapping rate (%)
CK 51 020 408 39 271 101 76.97 15 721 494 30.81
CA 51 020 408 40 477 918 79.34 16 694 860 32.72

Different genomic regions exhibited different methylation patterns. The majority of reads were mapped to CpG islands, followed by reads that mapped to the 2 kb region upstream of genes (upstream2k) (Fig. 1A, B). A depletion of, or increase in, reads was often observed within the gene coding sequences in the CA samples. In contrast, a gradual decrease in reads occurred across the upstream2k region (Fig. 1C). The distribution of reads on the genome (recorded in a 1000-bp window) had a peak at 20–25 CpG in both samples (see Supplementary Fig. S2A, B). However, the distribution of peaks in the window was maximum at 15–20 CpG in both samples (Supplementary Fig. S2C, D). The distributions revealed that most of the reads and peaks tended to be in the regions with low numbers of CpG. More interestingly, reads distributed in satellites only appeared in the CA samples, although only low numbers were detected (Supplementary Fig. S2E, F).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Distribution of uniquely mapped reads across different genomic regions. (A, B) Distribution of reads among CpG islands in CK (A) and CA (B). The x-axis shows the different gene regions and the y-axis shows the percentage of uniquely mapped reads. (C) Distribution of reads for the 2-kb region upstream of the transcription start site (TSS), the gene from the TSS to the transcription termination site (TTS), and the 2-kb region downstream of the TTS. DNA methylation was highest around the gene itself. (D, E) Distribution of DNA methylation peaks in different genomic regions in CK (D) and CA (E). The majority of peaks were present in the upstream2k region, followed by the downstream2k region, whereas the CDS and intron had fewer peaks. The x-axis shows the different genomic regions and the y-axis shows the number of peaks.

Methylation peaks, referred to as methyl-cytosine-enriched regions, are important for the identification of global DNA methylation patterns (Hu et al., 2013). In our study, peaks were most prevalent in the upstream2k regions in both the CK and CA samples (31.65% and 31.01%, respectively), followed by those within the region 2 kb downstream (downstream2k) of the transcription termination site (TTS) and coding DNA sequence (CDS) of the transcription start site (TSS); introns exhibited relatively fewer peaks (Fig. 1D, E). Methylation of CpG islands in the promoter and CDS regions is known to be involved in the regulation of gene expression, and these regions are reported to be hypomethylated in the vertebrate genome (Jones, 2012).

A comparison of DMRs revealed a total 29 624 between the CK and CA samples (see Supplementary Table S3). Next, we identified genes containing DMRs in both groups, resulting in a total of 1562 DMGs in the CA samples. These included 626 that were differentially methylated in the upstream2k (282 genes with decreased methylation, 344 genes with increased methylation), 275 in the CDS (133 genes with decreased methylation, 142 genes with increased methylation), 209 in the intron (99 genes with decreased methylation, 110 genes with increased methylation), and 452 in the downstream2k (196 genes with decreased methylation, 256 genes with increased methylation). More genes were up-methylated (n = 852) than down-methylated (n = 710) in CA plants compared to those in CK plants (Fig. 2A, Table 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Differentially methylated genes between CK and CA plants. (A) Distribution of differentially methylated genes (DMGs) across different genomic regions. The number of differentially methylated genes is given in Table 2. (B) Validation of MeDIP-seq data by bisulfite sequencing (BSP). Two highly methylated regions obtained from MeDIP-seq data were randomly selected for verification by BSP. The left y-axis left shows the extent of methylation calculated by dividing all of the CpGs analyzed by the total number of methylated CpGs detected, and the right y-axis shows the methylation level (read number) according to MeDIP-seq data. (C) mRNA expression of genes that exhibited down-methylation in the upstream2k between CK and CA plants. All significantly differentially methylated genes in upstream2k between CK and CA are down-methylated (see GO and KEGG results, P<0.05, Supplementary Tables S4–S7). From the 39 genes with differential methylation in upstream2k between CK and CA, we found only nine genes showing significantly different expression (five low-expression in CA are shown in the top row and four high-expression in CA are shown in bottom row). Vertical bars represent the standard deviation (SD) of the mean of three biological replicates. (D) Schematic drawing of the minigenes used in Arabidopsis transformation. (E) qRT-PCR analysis of transcript abundances of BramMDH1, BraKAT2, BraSHM4, and Bra4CL2 minigenes in wild-type and met1 Arabidopsis. Vertical bars represent the SD of the mean of three biological replicates. (F) DNA methylation levels of BramMDH1, BraKAT2, BraSHM4, and Bra4CL2 minigenes in wild-type and met1 Arabidopsis.

Table 2.

Numbers of differentially methylated genes across different gene regions

CA/CK upstream2k CDS Intron downstream2k
Down 282 133 99 196
Up 344 142 110 256

Biological features of genes that exhibit differential methylation

The 1562 DMGs identified between the CK and CA samples were assigned to terms in the Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) databases. Using the DAVID program (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/), we performed GO analysis. GO assignments revealed that genes with increased methylation in the CA samples were significantly involved in abscisic acid glucosyltransferase activity (terms for downstream2k, P<0.05, Supplementary Table S4). Genes with decreased methylation were strongly enriched in two categories: GTPase activity and L-malate dehydrogenase activity (terms for upstream2k, P<0.05, Supplementary Table S5). To determine the significant pathways involved in differential methylation, we used the KEGG pathway database to predict putative functions. Genes with increased methylation in the CA samples were significantly enriched in two pathways: protein export (terms for downstream2k, P<0.05, Supplementary Table S6) and homologous recombination (terms for introns, P<0.05, Supplementary Table S6). Genes with decreased methylation were related to five pathways, namely phagosome, citrate cycle (TCA cycle), carbon fixation in photosynthetic organisms, biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, and pyruvate metabolism (terms for upstream2k, P<0.05, Supplementary Table S7). Genes with methylation peaks in both the promoter and CDS regions were considered to be methylated genes (Song et al., 2015). The functional classification of DMGs revealed that malate dehydrogenase activity and carbon fixation were down-methylated in the upstream2k regions of the CA samples compare to those of the CK samples (Supplementary Tables S4–S7).

To validate the MeDIP-seq data, two regions (Bra031307, up-methylation in downstream2k, Chr A5: 16 837 978–16 839 977; Bra039662, down-methylation in upstream2k, Chr A6: 662 305–664 304) were selected for bisulfite sequencing. The results obtained for the two gene regions were in accordance with the MeDIP-seq results (Fig. 2B).

To determine whether DNA methylation affects gene expression, we selected all 39 genes with differential methylation in the upstream2k and performed qPCR in CK and CA plants (gene lists are shown in the GO and KEGG results, P<0.05, Supplementary Tables S4–S7). A total of nine DMGs exhibited differential expression patterns between CK and CA plants: four were up-regulated and five were down-regulated in CA plants (Fig. 2C). The remaining genes exhibited no significant difference in expression between the samples (data not shown). The qPCR results indicated that promoter methylation does not necessarily affect expression. These data highlight the importance of the down-methylation of BramMDH1 (Bra039662), BraKAT2 (Bra005522), BraSHM4 (Bra032749), and Bra4CL2 (Bra031266) during cold acclimation.

Genetic validation reveals that DNA methylation affects gene expression

Methylation levels in promoter regions generally correlate with gene expression levels (Zilberman et al., 2007). The maintenance of DNA methylation requires the DNA methyltransferase MET1 (methyl transferase 1), as well as the SWI/SNF2-like chromatin-remodeling protein DDM1 (decrease in DNA methylation 1) (Jeddeloh et al., 1999). Since mutants in the B. rapa background were unavailable, to confirm that the changes in DNA methylation had caused the changes in gene expression in BramMDH1, BraKAT2, BraSHM4, and Bra4CL2, we transformed the minigenes (Fig. 2D) pBramMDH1:HA-BramMDH1, pBraKAT2:HA-BraKAT2, pBraSHM4:HA-BraSHM4, and pBra4CL2:HA-Bra4CL2 into wild-type (WT) Arabidopsis and into a met1 mutant defective in DNA methylation. We first determined whether the expression levels of the minigenes were altered in the met1 mutant. Indeed, minigene expression levels were significantly higher in the met1 mutant than in the WT (Fig. 2E). Then, to demonstrate an association between DNA methylation and transcriptional expression, we determined the promoter methylation levels of the minigenes in the WT and mutant lines. BSP results showed that the methylation levels of minigenes were generally higher in the WT than in the met1 mutant (Fig. 2F). Together, these results suggest that DNA methylation of promoter regions is responsible for the altered expression of BramMDH1, BraKAT2, BraSHM4, and Bra4CL2.

Cold-acclimated B. rapa shows enhanced heat tolerance and increased biomass

Heat stress is a major abiotic factor limiting the growth of temperate plant species in many areas during summer months, and it may present a major challenge as global warming continues. Interestingly, when we planted CK and CA plants in the field, we found that the CA plants exhibited higher growth rates compared to those of CK plants in the summer (Fig. 3A). To confirm that the CA plants had elevated heat tolerances, CK and CA plants were grown continuously in controlled environment chambers at 40/35 °C for 12 h and then transferred to 23/18 °C conditions for 1 week of recovery. CA plants indeed displayed enhanced heat tolerance (Fig. 3B). Next, electrolyte leakage (EL) and malonaldehyde (MDA) content were measured in leaves of CK and CA plants. CA leaves exhibited significantly lower EL and MDA values compared with those of CK leaves (Fig. 3C, D), indicating that CA plants have enhanced heat tolerance compared to that of CK plants.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Cold-acclimated Brassica rapa shows elevated heat tolerance and high growth rate. Relative growth (A), heat tolerance (B), levels of electrolyte leakage (EL) (C), and malonaldehyde (MDA) contents (D) of CA and CK plants. (E) mRNA expression of the heat-shock protein gene BraHsp101 (Bra015922) in CK and CA plants. (F) Chlorophyll contents in CA and CK leaves. (G) Dry weight of CA and CK leaves. (H, I) Organic acid contents in leaves from CK and CA plants. (J) Net photosynthesis (PN) and (K) dark respiration (Rd) values in CA and CK plants. Error bars show the standard deviation (n = 3). (This figure is available in colour at JXB online).

Heat-stress factors (Hsf) and heat-shock proteins (Hsp) are central control proteins in the heat-stress response (Schöffl et al., 1998). HsfA2 is a major Hsf (Nishizawa et al., 2006; Schramm et al., 2006) in the plant heat stress response. In the HSF-HSP-HSBP1 pathway, HsfA1a triggers the heat-stress response by inducing HsfA1b and HsfA2 expression, which induces the expression of various Hsp proteins. Hsp70, Hsp101, and sHsp participate in the repair of damaged proteins (Qu et al., 2013). To further study the mechanisms of enhanced heat tolerance in the CA plants, we analyzed the transcript levels of BraHsfA2 (Bra000557), BraHsp70 (Bra006027), and BraHsp101 (Bra015922) in CK and CA plants by qPCR. CA plants exhibited a small increase in BraHsp101 mRNA, but this was not statistically significant (Fig. 3E). Transcript levels of BraHsfA2 and BraHsp70 did not appear to be affected by cold acclimation (data not shown). These results demonstrate that enhanced heat tolerance in CA plants is not caused by higher expression of Hsf and Hsp proteins.

In CA plants, a high growth rate was observed (Fig. 3A), so we measured chlorophyll content and biomass in CA leaves. CA leaves exhibited a small increase in chlorophyll content, but this was not significant (Fig. 3F). However, the DW of CA leaves was markedly elevated (Fig. 3G). Together with the functional classification of DMGs, which revealed that carbon fixation genes were differentially methylated in CA plants (see Supplementary Tables S4–S7), these results suggest that CA plants may exhibit enhanced photosynthesis or assimilation abilities, which serve to increase plant biomass.

Cold-acclimated plants exhibit increases in organic acids and photosynthesis

Heat stress induces changes in various metabolites, such as organic acids, amino acids, and carbohydrates, which have important functions in photosynthesis and respiration (Merewitz et al., 2012). Primary metabolic profiling has revealed that organic acids are affected by heat treatment in citrus (Yun et al., 2013). Citric acid, as a vital organic acid, has been reported to be closely related to aluminum poisoning (Tesfaye et al., 2001; Ma and Furukawa, 2003), iron stress (Shlizerman et al., 2007), heavy metal stress tolerance (Gao et al., 2010), and salinity stress (Sun and Hong, 2011). Exogenous citric acid improves heat stress tolerance in tall fescue (Hu et al., 2016). To investigate if the enhanced heat tolerance of CA plants was linked to an increase in organic acids, we measured the organic acid contents of the leaves of CK and CA plants. Leaves from CA plants showed increased organic acid concentrations compared with those of leaves from CK plants (Fig. 3H, I). Citrate, oxalate, and malate accumulation in CA leaves were about 2-fold higher than in CK plants, while succinate and acetate were not significantly different between CA and CK leaves. These findings suggest that the elevated organic acids in CA plants may contribute to enhanced heat resistance.

As already mentioned, CA plants had higher growth rates and biomass (Fig. 3A, G). To confirm that the higher growth rate in CA plants and higher levels of photosynthesis or assimilation were linked, we measured the PN and Rd values of the fully expanded leaves in CA and CK plants. PN was 25% higher in CA leaves than in CK leaves (Fig. 3J), while Rd in CA leaves was nearly half of that in CK leaves (Fig. 3K). Therefore, the high PN and low Rd of CA leaves enhances net photosynthesis, which plays a critical role in the net growth rate of the plants.

DNA methylation inhibitor promotes growth but not heat tolerance in B. rapa

MeDIP-seq data showed that cold acclimation induced both up- and down-regulation of methylation. However, all four candidate genes experienced promoter demethylation during cold acclimation. We sought to determine whether this DNA demethylation was the main reason for the increased heat tolerance and higher growth rate of CA plants. To further investigate whether DNA demethylation affected the expression of BramMDH1, BraKAT2, BraSHM4, and Bra4CL2 and the physiological phenotype of B. rapa, plants were treated with Aza, a commonly used DNA methylation inhibitor (Goffin and Eisenhauer, 2002; Zhong et al., 2013). The methylation and expression levels of the four candidate genes were measured by BSP and qPCR. As expected, Aza treatment led to decreased DNA methylation levels in the candidate genes (Fig. 4A). Compared to untreated plants, Aza treatment led to enhanced transcription of BramMDH1, BraKAT2, BraSHM4, and Bra4CL2 (Fig. 4B). Together with MeDIP-seq data and genetic validation, therefore, we can conclude that the altered expression patterns of the genes can be attributed to the lower levels of DNA methylation.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Effects of DNA methyltransferase inhibitor (5-aza-2-deoxycytidine, Aza) on Brassica rapa seedlings. (A) DNA methylation levels of BramMDH1, BraKAT2, BraSHM4, and Bra4CL2 in untreated (CK) and Aza-treated seedlings. (B) qRT-PCR analysis of transcript abundances of BramMDH1, BraKAT2, BraSHM4, and Bra4CL2 in untreated and Aza-treated seedlings. (C) Dry weight of leaves from untreated and Aza-treated seedlings. (D) Survival rates of untreated and Aza-treated seedlings after heat shock. (E) Organic acid contents in untreated and Aza-treated seedlings. Error bars show the standard deviation of the mean of three biological replicates.

In addition, the heat tolerances and growth rates of untreated and Aza-treated B. rapa were assessed by measuring seedling survival rates and DW, respectively, after heat stress. Aza treatment led to increased biomass in B. rapa (Fig. 4C). However, no significant difference in survival rate was observed after heat shock of untreated and Aza-treated B. rapa (Fig. 4D). Since we had observed that an increase in organic acids in CA plants may contribute to their enhanced heat resistance, we hypothesized that there would be no increase in organic acids in Aza-treated B. rapa. As expected, organic acids were not elevated in Aza-treated B. rapa compared with levels in untreated plants (Fig. 4E). As Aza is a DNA methylation inhibitor, these results suggest that DNA demethylation alone is not sufficient to increase plant heat tolerance.

Over-expression of BramMDH1 in Arabidopsis leads to increased heat tolerance and growth rate

Among the four candidate genes, only BramMDH1 is reported to be associated with organic acids, leaf respiration, plant growth, and aluminum tolerance (Journet et al., 1981; Tesfaye et al., 2001; Tomaz et al., 2010). To confirm that BramMDH1 was causally linked to increased heat tolerance and growth rate, we produced transgenic Arabidopsis expressing BramMDH1 cDNA under the control of the constitutive cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter. Levels of BramMDH1 mRNA were analyzed in selected transgenic and WT plants by qPCR. The 35S::BramMDH1 transgenic Arabidopsis exhibited up to a 5-fold increase in BramMDH1 transcription compared with that of the WT (see Supplementary Fig. S3). Next, we investigated whether overexpression of BramMDH1 led to increased heat tolerance and growth rate. As expected, 35S::BramMDH1 exhibited enhanced heat tolerance and biomass (Fig. 5A, B). Survival rate after heat shock at 40 °C for 1 h was 3-fold higher in 35S::BramMDH1 than in the WT (Fig. 5A). In addition, 35S::BramMDH1 had lower EL and MDA values than those of the WT after heat stress (Fig. 5C, D). Moreover, the DW of 35S::BramMDH1 was also elevated (Fig. 5B). Consistent with enhanced heat tolerance and higher growth rate, significant increases in organic acids (Fig. 5E, F) and PN (Fig. 5G) and a decrease in Rd (Fig. 5H) were observed in 35S::BramMDH1. Together with the above results, these findings suggest that BramMDH1 plays an important role in enhanced heat tolerance and growth rate.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Over-expression of BramMDH1 in Arabidopsis results in increased heat tolerance and higher growth rate. (A) Survival rate of 35S::BramMDH1 (OX) and wild-type (WT) Arabidopsis after heat shock. (B) Dry weight, (C) electrolyte leakage (EL) levels, and (D) malonaldehyde (MDA) contents of 35S::BramMDH1 (OX) and WT Arabidopsis. (E, F) Organic acid contents in leaves of 35S::BramMDH1 and WT Arabidopsis. (G) Net photosynthesis (PN) and (H) dark respiration (Rd) in 35S::BramMDH1 and WT Arabidopsis. Error bars show the standard deviation (n = 3).

Like 35S::BramMDH1, cold-acclimated B. rapa exhibited elevated BramMDH1 transcription, which was able to increase plant heat tolerance. However, Aza-treated B. rapa, which also exhibited high BramMDH1 expression (Fig. 4B), showed no significant increase in heat tolerance (Fig. 4D) and no elevation in organic acids (Fig. 4E). Both cold-acclimated and Aza-treated Brassica rapa had a high level of transcription of BramMDH1 that positively contributed to plants heat tolerance. But only cold-acclimated Brassica rapa had elevated heat tolerance. Therefore, as both methylation and demethylation were found in CA plants, we speculate that DNA methylation acts to suppress the expression of negative genes for organic acids and that it is also needed to increase heat tolerance in CA plants.

Discussion

Previously, many reports have demonstrated that cold acclimation acts to increase cold tolerance in many organisms, such as Arabidopsis (Wanner and Junttila, 1999; Thomashow, 1999), tomato (Barrero-Gil et al., 2016), rice (Ahamed et al., 2012), wheat (Hurry et al., 1995), Chorispora bungeana (Song et al., 2015), C. sativa (Mayer et al., 2015), and Drosophila melanogaster (MacMillan et al., 2016). Interestingly, we observed that cold-acclimated bok choy cabbage also exhibited enhanced heat tolerance and higher growth rate (Fig. 3A, B). Exposure of plants to a moderate stress can induce resistance to other stresses in a process called cross-adaptation, which has been demonstrated for several stress combinations (Sabehat et al., 1998; Bowler and Fluhr, 2000). For example, heat-shock treatment can not only improve plants’ thermotolerance but also increase their tolerance to other stresses, such as chilling (Collins et al., 1995; Sabehat et al., 1996; Kadyrzhanova et al., 1998), salinity (Kuznetsov et al., 1993), drought (Kuznetsov et al., 1999), and metal ion stress (Orzech and Burke, 1988; Neumann et al., 1994).

Epigenetic regulation plays an important role in plant adaptation to abiotic stresses (Chinnusamy and Zhu, 2009). Therefore, to investigate the molecular and biochemical mechanisms of cross-adaptation that confer elevated heat tolerance in cold-acclimated bok choy, we performed a comprehensive analysis of DNA methylation changes in leaves from control (CK) and cold-acclimated (CA) plants. Our analysis identified 29 624 regions and 1562 unique genes (852 genes with increased methylation, 710 genes with decreased methylation) that exhibit differential DNA methylation in CA plants compared to levels in CK plants (Fig. 2A; Table 2; Supplementary Table S3). These results indicate that both DNA methylation and demethylation occur during cold acclimation. Similar results were found in recent studies in C. sativa (Mayer et al., 2015) and C. bungeana (Song et al., 2015). Our methylome data show that cold acclimation induces both up- and down-regulation of methylation, suggesting a complex regulation of methylation involving various methylating and possibly demethylating agents. In summary, our experiments clearly demonstrate a significant role of changes in DNA methylation in cold acclimation.

Genes with differential methylation of both the promoter and gene regions were considered as DMGs (Hu et al., 2013). We found that nearly 60% of DMGs exhibited differential methylation levels in the upstream2k and CDS regions in CA plants (Fig. 2A; Table 2). After GO and KEGG functional classification of DMGs from the upstream2k and CDS regions, we identified significant enrichment of DMGs in CA plants in pathways linked to GTPase and L-malate dehydrogenase activity (down-methylation in upstream2k, P<0.05, Supplementary Table S5), phagosome, citrate cycle (TCA cycle), carbon fixation in photosynthetic organisms, biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, and pyruvate metabolism (down-methylation in upstream2k, P<0.05, Supplementary Table S7). Overall, our DNA methylation profiles revealed that malate dehydrogenase activity and carbon fixation were significantly affected in CA plants. Hypermethylation of certain genomic regions may lead to suppressed transcription (Bird, 2007). In contrast, hypomethylation may lead to increased transcription. By combining genetic validation (Fig. 2E, F) and DNA methylation inhibitor data (Fig. 4A, B), we identified four candidate genes (BramMDH1, BraKAT2, BraSHM4, and Bra4CL2) that exhibited decreased DNA methylation in promoter regions and increased gene expression in CA plants.

Leaf EL and MDA levels are generally used to assess the extent of membrane damage caused by environmental stress (Cen et al., 2016; Hu et al., 2016). To further validate the enhanced heat tolerance in CA plants, we detected EL and MDA levels in leaves of CK and CA plants after heat stress. Consistent with the elevated heat tolerance in CA plants (Fig. 3B), CA leaves exhibited lower EL and MDA values compared with those in CK leaves (Fig. 3C, D). Next, to identify factors that may contribute to enhanced heat tolerance in CA plants, we tested if there were significant associations between elevated heat tolerance and the expression levels of Hsf and Hsp genes, which are involved in resistance to heat stress in plants (Schöffl et al., 1998). Unexpectedly, we found no significant increases in the expression of Hsf and Hsp genes in CA plants compared with CK levels (Fig. 3E). This result indicated that enhanced heat tolerance in CA plants was not caused by elevated expression of Hsf and Hsp proteins, which is consistent with a previous report (Fu et al., 1998). Many studies have suggested that organic acids are closely associated with abiotic stresses, such as aluminum poisoning (Ma and Furukawa, 2003), iron stress (Shlizerman et al., 2007), heavy metal stress tolerance (Gao et al., 2010), and salinity stress (Sun and Hong, 2011). We therefore tested for an association between elevated heat tolerance and organic acid content in CA plants. Indeed, significant accumulation of citrate, oxalate, and malate were observed in CA leaves (Fig. 3H, I), suggesting that an increase in organic acids in CA plants may contribute to enhanced heat resistance.

We observed a higher growth rate in CA plants. Additionally, DMGs were significantly enriched in malate dehydrogenase activity and carbon fixation in CA plants, pathways which have also been identified as associated with cold acclimation in Arabidopsis (Stitt and Hurry, 2002). Similarly, the primary components of photosynthesis, including thylakoid electron transport and the carbon reduction cycle, are affected by cold temperatures in many species, including tomato (Martin et al., 1981), maize (Kingston-Smith et al., 1997), and cucumber (Choi et al., 1994). Moreover, following long-term cold-hardening of winter and spring cultivars of wheat and rape, winter cultivars had higher net assimilation rates and higher photosynthetic rates than the corresponding spring cultivars (Hurry et al., 1995). Therefore, to identify factors that may contribute to high growth rates in cold-acclimated bok choy, we measured the chlorophyll content, PN, and Rd, which play critical roles in photosynthesis and carbon fixation. We found no significant differences in chlorophyll content between CK and CA leaves (Fig. 3F). However, consistent with the fact that the CA plants have a higher growth rate, an increase in PN and decrease in Rd were observed in CA leaves compared with values in CK leaves (Fig. 3J, K). These results indicate that enhanced photosynthesis in CA plants may contribute to their higher growth rate.

CA plants exhibited elevated organic acids and enhanced photosynthesis, which may contribute to increased heat tolerance and higher growth rate, respectively. We therefore sought to determine whether any of the four candidate genes were responsible for the elevated organic acids and enhanced photosynthesis. Recent studies have shown that mMDH1 in Arabidopsis plays an important role in plant growth rate, respiration, and photosynthesis. The slow-growing mmdh1mmdh2 double-mutant exhibits an elevated leaf respiration rate. Complementation of mmdh1mmdh2 with mMDH cDNA suppressed the respiration rate and increased plant growth (Tomaz et al., 2010). In addition, overexpression of malate dehydrogenase in transgenic alfalfa enhances organic acid synthesis and confers tolerance to aluminum (Tesfaye et al., 2001). In CA plants, we found promoter demethylation led to elevated BramMDH1 expression. However, it was still unclear whether the elevated expression of BramMDH1 in CA plants had a direct effect on enhanced heat tolerance and/or growth rate. To determine the role of BramMDH1 in heat tolerance, we overexpressed BramMDH1 in Arabidopsis. After heat stress, 35S::BramMDH1 exhibited a higher survival rate and lower EL and MDA values when compared with those of the WT (Fig. 5A, C, D). In addition, elevated levels of organic acids were found in leaves from 35S::BramMDH1 plants compared with levels in controls (Fig. 5E, F). Moreover, 35S::BramMDH1 displayed increased PN (Fig. 5G) and decreased Rd (Fig. 5H) values, consistent with the higher DW (Fig. 5B) of 35S::BramMDH1 plants. These experimental results are in agreement with our bok choy data, where CA plants showed enhanced heat tolerance and higher growth rate in parallel with increased expression and reduced DNA methylation of BramMDH1. Hence, our functional data support an active role of the candidate gene BramMDH1 in enhanced heat tolerance and higher growth rate in cold-acclimated bok choy.

In our study, CA plants exhibited high BramMDH1 expression due to promoter demethylation. Moreover, 35S::BramMDH1 showed enhanced heat tolerance and a higher growth rate. Surprisingly, Aza-treated B. rapa, which also exhibits high BramMDH1 expression, demonstrated no significant increase in heat tolerance compared with that of untreated B. rapa (Fig. 4D). Moreover, organic acids, which were elevated in CA and 35S::BramMDH1 plants, were not elevated in Aza-treated B. rapa (Fig. 4E). Aza is a specific inhibitor of DNA methylation (Goffin and Eisenhauer, 2002; Zhong et al., 2013). In cold-acclimated B. rapa, however, some genes experienced increased methylation while some experienced reduced methylation. Therefore, we suggest that DNA methylation also plays an important role in increasing heat tolerance in CA plants. Likewise, in honeybee caste determination, both up- and down-methylation in the brains of workers and the queen have been detected (Lyko et al., 2010), which cannot be explained by only the up-regulation of Dnmts in one of the castes. Together, our experimental and MeDIP-seq data support a model where enhanced heat tolerance and higher growth rate in CA plants are attributed to elevated organic acids and enhanced photosynthesis, respectively. These changes are associated with DNA methylation and demethylation during cold acclimation. Our findings may aid in developing a deeper understanding of cross-adaptation in plants.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Data

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31330067; 31301782), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China (BK20130673), China Postdoctoral Science Special Foundation (2015T80561), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2014M550294), and Opening Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement (ZW2014006).

References

  1. Ahamed A, Murai-Hatano M, Ishikawa-Sakurai J, Hayashi H, Kawamura Y, Uemura M. 2012. Cold stress-induced acclimation in rice is mediated by root-specific aquaporins. Plant & Cell Physiology 53, 1445–1456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen DJ, Ort DR. 2001. Impacts of chilling temperatures on photosynthesis in warm-climate plants. Trends in Plant Science 6, 36–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barrero-Gil J, Huertas R, Rambla JL, Granell A, Salinas J. 2016. Tomato plants increase their tolerance to low temperature in a chilling acclimation process entailing comprehensive transcriptional and metabolic adjustments. Plant, Cell & Environment 39, 2303–2318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bird A. 2007. Perceptions of epigenetics. Nature 447, 396–398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bowler C, Fluhr R. 2000. The role of calcium and activated oxygens as signals for controlling cross-tolerance. Trends in Plant Science 5, 241–246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cen H, Ye W, Liu Y, Li D, Wang K, Zhang W. 2016. Overexpression of a chimeric gene, osdst-srdx, improved salt tolerance of perennial ryegrass. Scientific Reports 6, 27320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chinnusamy V, Zhu J, Zhu JK. 2007. Cold stress regulation of gene expression in plants. Trends in Plant Science 12, 444–451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chinnusamy V, Zhu JK. 2009. Epigenetic regulation of stress responses in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 12, 133–139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Choi CS, Sano H. 2007. Abiotic-stress induces demethylation and transcriptional activation of a gene encoding a glycerophosphodiesterase-like protein in tobacco plants. Molecular Genetics and Genomics 277, 589–600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Choi SM, Jeong SW, Jeong WJ, Kwon SY, Chow WS, Park YI. 1994. The site of photoinhibition in leaves of Cucumis sativus L. at low temperatures is photosystem I, not photosystem II. Planta 193, 300–306. [Google Scholar]
  11. Clough SJ, Bent AF. 1998. Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal 16, 735–743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Collins G, Nie XL, Saltveit ME. 1995. Heat shock proteins and chilling sensitivity of mung bean hypocotyls. Journal of Experimental Botany 46, 795–802. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dyson BC, Miller MA, Feil R, Rattray N, Bowsher CG, Goodacre R, Lunn JE, Johnson GN. 2016. FUM2, a cytosolic fumarase, is essential for acclimation to low temperature in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiology 172, 118–127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fowler S, Thomashow MF. 2002. Arabidopsis transcriptome profiling indicates that multiple regulatory pathways are activated during cold acclimation in addition to the CBF cold response pathway. The Plant cell 14, 1675–1690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fu P, Wilen RW, Robertson AJ, Low NH, Tyler RT, Gusta LV. 1998. Heat tolerance of cold acclimated puma winter rye seedlings and the effect of a heat shock on freezing tolerance. Plant and Cell Physiology 39, 942–949. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gao Y, Miao C, Mao L, Zhou P, Jin Z, Shi W. 2010. Improvement of phytoextraction and antioxidative defense in Solanum nigrum L. under cadmium stress by application of cadmium-resistant strain and citric acid. Journal of Hazardous Materials 181, 771–777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Goffin J, Eisenhauer E. 2002. DNA methyltransferase inhibitors-state of the art. Annals of Oncology 13, 1699–1716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hu L, Zhang Z, Xiang Z, Yang Z. 2016. Exogenous application of citric acid ameliorates the adverse effect of heat stress in tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum). Frontiers in Plant Science 7, 179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hu Y, Xu H, Li Z, Zheng X, Jia X, Nie Q, Zhang X. 2013. Comparison of the genome-wide DNA methylation profiles between fast-growing and slow-growing broilers. PLoS ONE 8, e56411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hua J. 2009. From freezing to scorching, transcriptional responses to temperature variations in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 12, 568–573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hurry VM, Strand A, Tobiaeson M, Gardestrom P, Oquist G. 1995. Cold hardening of spring and winter wheat and rape results in differential effects on growth, carbon metabolism, and carbohydrate content. Plant Physiology 109, 697–706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jeddeloh JA, Stokes TL, Richards EJ. 1999. Maintenance of genomic methylation requires a SWI2/SNF2-like protein. Nature Genetics 22, 94–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jia Y, Ding Y, Shi Y, Zhang X, Gong Z, Yang S. 2016. The cbfs triple mutants reveal the essential functions of CBFs in cold acclimation and allow the definition of CBF regulons in Arabidopsis. New Phytologist 212, 345–353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Johnson JF, Allan DL, Vance CP, Weiblen G. 1996. Root carbon dioxide fixation by phosphorus-deficient Lupinus albus (contribution to organic acid exudation by proteoid roots). Plant Physiology 112, 19–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Jones PA. 2012. Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond. Nature Reviews Genetics 13, 484–492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Journet EP, Neuburger M, Douce R. 1981. Role of glutamate-oxaloacetate transaminase and malate dehydrogenase in the regeneration of NAD for glycine oxidation by spinach leaf mitochondria. Plant Physiology 67, 467–469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kadyrzhanova DK, Vlachonasios KE, Ververidis P, Dilley DR. 1998. Molecular cloning of a novel heat induced/chilling tolerance related cDNA in tomato fruit by use of mRNA differential display. Plant Molecular Biology 36, 885–895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kim JM, To TK, Ishida J, et al. 2008. Alterations of lysine modifications on the histone H3 N-tail under drought stress conditions in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant & Cell Physiology 49, 1580–1588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kingston-Smith AH, Harbinson J, Williams J, Foyer CH. 1997. Effect of chilling on carbon assimilation, enzyme activation, and photosynthetic electron transport in the absence of photoinhibition in maize leaves. Plant Physiology 114, 1039–1046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Knight H, Mugford SG, Ulker B, Gao D, Thorlby G, Knight MR. 2009. Identification of SFR6, a key component in cold acclimation acting post-translationally on CBF function. The Plant Journal 58, 97–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Knight MR, Knight H. 2012. Low-temperature perception leading to gene expression and cold tolerance in higher plants. The New Phytologist 195, 737–751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kuznetsov VV, Rakutin VY, Borisova NN, Rotschupkin BV. 1993. Why does heat shock increase salt resistance in cotton plants? Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 31, 181–188. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kuznetsov VV, Rakutin VY, Zholkevich VN. 1999. Effect of preliminary heat-shock treatment on accumulation of osmolytes and drought resistance in cotton plants during water deficiency. Physiologia Plantarum 107, 399–406. [Google Scholar]
  34. Lyko F, Foret S, Kucharski R, Wolf S, Falckenhayn C, Maleszka R. 2010. The honey bee epigenomes: differential methylation of brain DNA in queens and workers. PLoS Biology 8, e1000506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ma JF, Furukawa J. 2003. Recent progress in the research of external Al detoxification in higher plants: a minireview. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry 97, 46–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. MacMillan HA, Knee JM, Dennis AB, Udaka H, Marshall KE, Merritt TJ, Sinclair BJ. 2016. Cold acclimation wholly reorganizes the Drosophila melanogaster transcriptome and metabolome. Scientific Reports 6, 28999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Martin B, Ort DR, Boyer JS. 1981. Impairment of photosynthesis by chilling-temperatures in tomato. Plant Physiology 68, 329–334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Mayer BF, Ali-Benali MA, Demone J, Bertrand A, Charron JB. 2015. Cold acclimation induces distinctive changes in the chromatin state and transcript levels of COR genes in Cannabis sativa varieties with contrasting cold acclimation capacities. Physiologia Plantarum 155, 281–295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Medina J, Catalá R, Salinas J. 2011. The CBFs: three Arabidopsis transcription factors to cold acclimate. Plant Science 180, 3–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Merewitz EB, Du H, Yu W, Liu Y, Gianfagna T, Huang B. 2012. Elevated cytokinin content in ipt transgenic creeping bentgrass promotes drought tolerance through regulating metabolite accumulation. Journal of Experimental Botany 63, 1315–1328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Nagler M, Nukarinen E, Weckwerth W, Nägele T. 2015. Integrative molecular profiling indicates a central role of transitory starch breakdown in establishing a stable C/N homeostasis during cold acclimation in two natural accessions of Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biology 15, 284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Neumann D, Lichtenberger O, Tschiersh K, Nover L. 1994. Heat shock proteins induce heavy-metal tolerance in higher plants. Planta 194, 360–367. [Google Scholar]
  43. Nishida I, Murata N. 1996. Chilling sensitivity in plants and cyanobacteria: The crucial contribution of membrane lipids. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 47, 541–568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Nishizawa A, Yabuta Y, Yoshida E, Maruta T, Yoshimura K, Shigeoka S. 2006. Arabidopsis heat shock transcription factor A2 as a key regulator in response to several types of environmental stress. The Plant Journal 48, 535–547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Orzech KA, Burke JJ. 1988. Heat shock and the protection against metal toxicity in wheat leaves. Plant Cell, & Environment 11, 711–714. [Google Scholar]
  46. Palta JP, Chen HH, Li PH. 1981. Relationship between heat and frost resistance of tuber-bearing Solanum species: effect of cold acclimation on heat resistance. Botanical Gazette 142, 311–315. [Google Scholar]
  47. Qu AL, Ding YF, Jiang Q, Zhu C. 2013. Molecular mechanisms of the plant heat stress response. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 432, 203–207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Richardson AD, Duigan SP, Berlyn GP. 2002. An evaluation of noninvasive methods to estimate foliar chlorophyll content. New Phytologist 153, 185–194. [Google Scholar]
  49. Sabehat A, Weiss D, Lurie S. 1996. The correlation between heat-shock protein accumulation and persistence and chilling tolerance in tomato fruit. Plant Physiology 110, 531–537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Sabehat A, Weiss D, Lurie S. 1998. Heat-shock proteins and cross-tolerance in plants. Physiologia Plantarum 103, 437–441. [Google Scholar]
  51. Schöffl F, Prändl R, Reindl A. 1998. Regulation of the heat-shock response. Plant Physiology 117, 1135–1141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Schramm F, Ganguli A, Kiehlmann E, Englich G, Walch D, von Koskull-Döring P. 2006. The heat stress transcription factor HsfA2 serves as a regulatory amplifier of a subset of genes in the heat stress response in Arabidopsis. Plant Molecular Biology 60, 759–772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Shi Y, Ding Y, Yang S. 2015. Cold signal transduction and its interplay with phytohormones during cold acclimation. Plant & Cell Physiology 56, 7–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Shlizerman L, Marsh K, Blumwald E, Sadka A. 2007. Iron-shortage-induced increase in citric acid content and reduction of cytosolic aconitase activity in Citrus fruit vesicles and calli. Physiologia Plantarum 131, 72–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Song Y, Liu L, Feng Y, Wei Y, Yue X, He W, Zhang H, An L. 2015. Chilling- and freezing-induced alterations in cytosine methylation and its association with the cold tolerance of an alpine subnival plant, Chorispora bungeana. PLoS ONE 10, e0135485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Stitt M, Hurry V. 2002. A plant for all seasons: alterations in photosynthetic carbon metabolism during cold acclimation in Arabidopsis. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 5, 199–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Strand A, Hurry V, Gustafsson P, Gardeström P. 1997. Development of Arabidopsis thaliana leaves at low temperatures releases the suppression of photosynthesis and photosynthetic gene expression despite the accumulation of soluble carbohydrates. The Plant Journal 12, 605–614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Strand A, Hurry V, Henkes S, Huner N, Gustafsson P, Gardeström P, Stitt M. 1999. Acclimation of Arabidopsis leaves developing at low temperatures. Increasing cytoplasmic volume accompanies increased activities of enzymes in the Calvin cycle and in the sucrose-biosynthesis pathway. Plant Physiology 119, 1387–1398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Sun YL, Hong SK. 2011. Effects of citric acid as an important component of the responses to saline and alkaline stress in the halophyte Leymus chinensis (Trin.). Plant Growth Regulation 64, 129–139. [Google Scholar]
  60. Tesfaye M, Temple SJ, Allan DL, Vance CP, Samac DA. 2001. Overexpression of malate dehydrogenase in transgenic alfalfa enhances organic acid synthesis and confers tolerance to aluminum. Plant Physiology 127, 1836–1844. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Thalhammer A, Hincha DK. 2014. A mechanistic model of COR15 protein function in plant freezing tolerance: integration of structural and functional characteristics. Plant Signaling & Behavior 9, e977722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Thomashow MF. 1999. PLANT COLD ACCLIMATION: Freezing tolerance genes and regulatory mechanisms. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 50, 571–599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Tomaz T, Bagard M, Pracharoenwattana I, Lindén P, Lee CP, Carroll AJ. 2010. Mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase lowers leaf respiration and alters photorespiration and plant growth in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 154, 1143–1157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Vanyushin BF, Ashapkin VV. 2011. DNA methylation in higher plants: past, present and future. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1809, 360–368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Wanner LA, Junttila O. 1999. Cold-induced freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 120, 391–400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Yun Z, Gao H, Liu P, et al. 2013. Comparative proteomic and metabolomic profiling of citrus fruit with enhancement of disease resistance by postharvest heat treatment. BMC Plant Biology 13, 44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Zhao C, Zhang Z, Xie S, Si T, Li Y, Zhu JK. 2016. Mutational evidence for the critical role of CBF genes in cold acclimation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 171, 2744–2759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Zhao MT, Whyte JJ, Hopkins GM, Kirk MD, Prather RS. 2014. Methylated DNA immunoprecipitation and high-throughput sequencing (MeDIP-seq) using low amounts of genomic DNA. Cellular Reprogramming 16, 175–184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Zhong S, Fei Z, Chen YR, et al. 2013. Single-base resolution methylomes of tomato fruit development reveal epigenome modifications associated with ripening. Nature Biotechnology 31, 154–159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Zilberman D, Gehring M, Tran RK, Ballinger T, Henikoff S. 2007. Genome-wide analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana DNA methylation uncovers an interdependence between methylation and transcription. Nature Genetics 39, 61–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data

Articles from Journal of Experimental Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES