Skip to main content
PMC home page
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2017 Feb 17;101(11):4791–4798. doi: 10.1007/s00253-017-8185-9

Fungi-based treatment of brewery wastewater—biomass production and nutrient reduction

M Hultberg 1,✉, H Bodin 2
PMCID: PMC5442259  PMID: 28213731

Abstract

The beer-brewing process produces high amounts of nutrient-rich wastewater, and the increasing number of microbreweries worldwide has created a need for innovative solutions to deal with this waste. In the present study, fungal biomass production and the removal of organic carbon, phosphorus and nitrogen from synthetic brewery wastewater were studied. Different filamentous fungi with a record of safe use were screened for growth, and Trametes versicolor, Pleurotus ostreatus and Trichoderma harzianum were selected for further work. The highest biomass production, 1.78 ± 0.31 g L−1 of dry weight, was observed when P. ostreatus was used for the treatment, while T. harzianum demonstrated the best capability for removing nutrients. The maximum reduction of chemical oxygen demand, 89% of the initial value, was observed with this species. In the removal of total nitrogen and phosphorus, no significant difference was observed between the species, while removal of ammonium varied between the strains. The maximum reduction of ammonium, 66.1% of the initial value, was also found in the T. harzianum treatment. It can be concluded that all treatments provided significant reductions in all water-quality parameters after 3 days of growth and that the utilisation of filamentous fungi to treat brewery wastewater, linked to a deliberate strategy to use the biomass produced, has future potential in a bio-based society.

Keywords: Filamentous fungi, Microbrewery, Nutrient recycling, Pleurotus ostreatus, Trichoderma harzianum, Water quality

Introduction

Beer is the fifth most consumed beverage in the world, and the beer-brewing industry constitutes an important economic segment in many countries around the world (Fillaudeau et al. 2006; Simate et al. 2011). In recent years, the interest in small-scale brewing has also grown due to a rise in the appeal of locally produced food and beverages (Maier 2013), generally as a result of an increase in the environmental consciousness of individual consumers (Schnell and Reese 2003).

The brewing process consumes large quantities of water and generates 3–10 L of wastewater per 1 L of beer produced (Simate et al. 2011; Olajire 2012; Seluy and Isla 2014). This wastewater typically contains very high levels of organic carbon and phosphorus, and nitrogen levels similar to or higher than those found in raw domestic wastewater (Hang et al. 1975; Brewers of Europe 2002; Rao et al. 2007; Simate et al. 2011). However, compared to municipal sewage, brewery wastewater contains high-quality nutrients, but not problematic pollutants such as pharmaceuticals and enteric pathogens.

For microbreweries, wastewater volumes range from 18 to 3000 m3 per day, depending on the size of the microbrewery (Tucker 2007; Yang and Li 2002). Currently, microbreweries may discharge 90% of their wastewater directly into municipal sewer systems (Shao et al. 2008) or to the surrounding environment in countries with less developed wastewater treatment systems (Yang and Li 2002; Simate et al. 2011), often without prior on-site treatment. Discharge of brewery wastewater into municipal sewer systems can create odour and corrosion management issues and also increase greenhouse gas emissions from such systems (Sudarjanto et al. 2011). The discharge will also evidently increase the load of biodegradable organic carbon and nutrients to municipal wastewater treatment plants, and problems related to the discharge of brewery wastewater have been observed in several wastewater treatment plants in Sweden (IVL 2002). For large-scale breweries with existing wastewater treatment on-site, conventional treatment methods have been anaerobic reactors (UASB) and/or activated sludge systems (Zheng et al. 2015; Simate et al. 2011). These treatment systems generally do not lead to recycling of important nutrients in the waste, but instead produce relatively large quantities of low-value sludge and create disposal problems (Simate et al. 2011; Shao et al. 2008). Also, the use of microalgae for treatment of brewery wastewater has been investigated (Mata et al. 2012). However, the constraints are microalgal harvest (Uduman et al. 2010) and the risk for low transmittance of light due to particles in the brewery wastewater.

The nutritional composition of brewery wastewater suggests that it could be a suitable medium for cultivation of heterotrophic microorganisms such as fungi. In fact, submerged cultivation of fungi is a biotechnology that has been explored in the past, where liquid medium is inoculated with spores or mycelium from certain fungi. Simultaneous cultivation of fungal biomass and waste treatment, such as the high removal of organic carbon in brewery wastes, has also been reported using this technique (Shannon and Stevenson 1975; Hang et al. 1975). However, in the last three decades, submerged cultivation of fungal biomass has received less attention, despite the use of filamentous fungi for wastewater treatment being identified as an interesting area with benefits such as development of a biorefinary concept and easy harvest (Sankaran et al. 2010).

The fungal biomass produced during treatment of brewery wastewater could also be of interest for several applications. There is an urgent need to identify new feed resources that could increase the supply of protein and thus the sustainability in animal production (Poppi and McLennan 2010). Fungal biomass is rich in protein and fibres, and thus the cultivation of edible fungi in brewery wastewater in a controlled process may produce biomass that is useful as animal feed. Furthermore, certain fungi contain high amounts of biopolymers, such as chitin (40–45% of dry weight biomass), which make them appropriate as ingredients in biomaterial (Kumirska et al. 2010; Kuktaite et al. 2011; Dhillon et al. 2016). Another option is to use the cultivated fungal biomass in the treatment of polluted water, both due to the production of enzymes such as laccase for certain fungal species and because it has been reported that fungal biomass can replace high-cost activated carbon as a biosorbent (Parenti et al. 2013; Dhillon et al. 2016).

In this study, the main focus was on biomass production and the removal of organic carbon, phosphorus and nitrogen from brewery wastewater through submerged fungal cultivation using different species of fungi. From a longer-term perspective and considering large-scale in situ treatment, it is important to use non-harmful fungal species in order to avoid secondary health or environmental problems (Chanda et al. 2016). The fungal species tested in the present study are therefore either edible or have a long record of safe use.

Material and methods

Microorganisms

The fungal species used in the experiments were Agaricus bisporus M7215, Pleurotus ostreatus ATCC® 44309™ and M2140, Lentinula edodes M3782, Trichoderma harzianum CBS 226.95 and Trametes versicolor M9912. The species A. bisporus, P. ostreatus and L. edodes were selected for the experiments since they are well-known edible mushrooms. T. versicolor was included since it is an edible, however considered unpalatable, and fast-growing species with biotechnological and pharmaceutical application (Damle and Shukla 2010). T. harzianum was included since this species has a long record of large-scale use in agriculture (Vinalea et al. 2008). The strains were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Mycelium BVBA, Belgium (M) and the CBS Fungal Biodiversity Centre in The Netherlands (CBS). Long-term storage of all strains was carried out at room temperature on malt agar (MA), amended with streptomycin in a concentration of 100 μg mL−1 in order to avoid bacterial contamination. For fungal inoculum production, all strains (with the exception of A. bisporus) were propagated on plates containing 20 mL potato dextrose agar (PDA) for 10 days at 27 °C. A. bisporus was cultivated in the same conditions for 20 days since it grew more slowly compared to the other fungi. Circular slants (diameter 15 mm) from the PDA plates were used as fungal inoculum in all the experiments.

Brewery wastewater

Synthetic brewery wastewater (SBW), mimicking the composition of the total effluent from a brewery (Enitan et al. 2015), was prepared according to Mata et al. (2012) and used in the experiments. The composition of the SBW was 1 g L−1 malt extract, 0.5 g L−1 yeast extract, 0.15 g L−1 peptone, 0.86 L−1 maltose, 0.22 g L−1 (NH4)2SO4, 0.08 g L−1 NaH2PO4 and 0.14 g L−1 Na2HPO4. After autoclavation, the SBW was cooled and 2 mL of ethanol (96%) was added per litre. The prepared SBW had a pH of 6.6 ± 0.04. The initial values of chemical oxygen demand (COD), total nitrogen (TN), ammonium-nitrogen (NH4 +-N) and phosphate-phosphorus (PO4 3−-P) are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Initial concentrations of the water-quality parameters chemical oxygen demand (COD), total nitrogen (TN), ammonium-nitrogen (NH4 +-N) and phosphate-phosphorus (PO4 3−-P) in the synthetic brewery wastewater (SBW)

Parameter Concentrationa
COD 5567 ± 106
Total nitrogen 111 ± 8.2
Ammonium-nitrogen 53.0 ± 6.4
Phosphate-phosphorus (PO4 3−-P) 62.6 ± 4.1
Open in a new tab

All values are in mg L−1

aMean ± SD (standard deviation)

Experimental set-up

Experiments were performed as batch reactors in 100 mL Erlenmeyer glass flasks on a horizontal orbital shaker (VWR, Advanced 5000 shaker, Radnor, PA, USA) at 150 rpm at 27 °C. Each reactor contained 35 mL SBW. The dry weight of the inoculum (mycelium and PDA) was determined for each strain by drying slants at 60 °C until constant weight.

The first experimental set-up comprised of six treatments: (1) A. bisporus M7215, (2) P. ostreatus ATCC® 44,309™, (3) P. ostreatus M2140, (4) L. edodes M3782, (5) T. harzianum CBS 226.95 and (6) T. versicolor M9912. In the first experiment, samples were taken after 7 days of growth in order to determine fungal biomass production. Three of the included fungi that had the highest biomass production in this experiment were selected for the second experimental set-up (P. ostreatus M2140, T. harzianum CBS 226.95, T. versicolor M9912). During the second experimental set-up, samples were taken on days 0, 3, 6, 10 and 13 to estimate biomass production and nutrient removal over time. In these two experiments, one slant of fungal inoculum was added to each reactor.

In the third experimental set-up, a mixed culture of P. ostreatus M2140 and T. harzianum CBS 226.95 was compared to single cultures of P. ostreatus M2140 and T. harzianum CBS 226.95, respectively. Two slants of fungal inoculum were added to each reactor in the third experimental set-up, which was conducted for 8 days.

Analysis

Fungal biomass production

Fungal biomass was collected by filtration through a nylon filter (mesh size 100 μm) and washed twice with an equal amount of distilled water. Before and after filtration, the filters were dried in an oven at 60 °C until constant weight in order to determine the total dry weight of the fungal biomass collected. To determine the fungal biomass produced, the dry weight of the inoculum was subtracted from the total dry weight for each fungus at the end of the experiment in the first experimental set-up.

Nutrient analysis

Concentrations of TN, NH4 +-N, PO4 3−-P and COD were determined in the SBW before and after treatment when the fungal biomass had been removed from the SBW by filtration. All SBW samples were frozen until analysis. Concentration of TN was determined with Hach Lange LCK 338 (ISO 1997) and the concentration of NH4 +-N was determined with Hach Lange LCK 303 (ISO 1984). Phosphate-phosphorus was determined with Hach Lange LCK 350 (ISO 2004). In order to study the effect of the treatments on organic carbon, COD was determined using Hach Lange LCK 014 (ISO 1989).

Statistics

In each experiment, each treatment was carried out in triplicate. Each experiment was repeated once. Mean values and standard deviations are reported. Data were analysed by analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05 (Minitab, version 16, State College, PA, USA).

Results

Biomass production

P. ostreatus M2140, T. harzianum CBS 226.95 and T. versicolor M9912 showed the highest biomass production after 7 days of growth in SBW (Fig. 1) and these were therefore selected for the second experiment. No significant differences in magnitude of biomass production were observed between these strains. P. ostreatus ATCC® 44,309™ showed a significantly lower biomass production after 7 days (0.60 ± 0.10 g L−1) compared to P. ostreatus M2140 (0.90 ± 0.02 g L−1). Very low or no biomass production was recorded for A. bisporus M7215 and L. edodes M3782 after 7 days of growth in SBW (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Produced biomass after 7 days of submerged growth in synthetic brewery wastewater

When biomass production over time was monitored (Fig. 2), no significant differences were observed on days 3 and 6 between the strains used. On day 10, the maximum biomass yield was noted (1.78 ± 0.31 g L−1) and was linked to P. ostreatus M2140. This biomass was significantly higher compared to the one for T. versicolor M9912 and T. harzianum CBS 226.95 on day 10. No increase in biomass was recorded between days 10 and 13 for P. ostreatus M2140 and T. versicolor M9912, while T. harzianum CBS 226.95 continued to increase. As a consequence of this, no significant differences were observed between P. ostreatus M2140 and T. harzianum CBS 226.95 on day 13. When a mixed culture of P. ostreatus M2140 and T. harzianum CBS 226.95 was inoculated in SBW, the biomass produced was significantly lower compared to when pure cultures were applied (Table 2). The single culture of P. ostreatus M2140 yielded the maximum biomass (0.96 ± 0.10 g L−1), which was significantly higher than the other two treatments (Table 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Biomass production over time for P. ostreatus, T. versicolor and T. harzianum, respectively during submerged growth in synthetic brewery wastewater

Table 2.

Produced biomass (mg dry weight L−1) in synthetic brewery wastewater (SBW) after an eight-day growth period of P. ostreatus (PO), T. harzianum (TH) and PO + TH, respectively. Final concentrations (mg L−1) of chemical oxygen demand (COD), total nitrogen (TN), ammonium-nitrogen (NH4 +-N) and phosphate-phosphorus (PO4 3−-P) in the SBW are also shown

Treatment Produced biomass COD TN NH4 +-N PO4 3−-P
P. ostreatus (PO) 955 ± 111a* 3065 ± 285a 54.2 ± 5.5a 42.8 ± 5.2a 54.2 ± 5.5a
T. harzianum (TH) 695 ± 44b 1221 ± 48b 53.1 ± 1.2a 17.6 ± 1.1b 53.1 ± 1.2a
PO + TH 426 ± 15c 1288 ± 104b 55.5 ± 2.2a 24.9 ± 4.3b 55.5 ± 2.2a
Open in a new tab

*Values within columns followed by different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05, Tukey’s test)

Nutrient reduction

Concentrations of all water-quality parameters (COD, TN, NH4 +-N and PO4 3−-P) were significantly lower in all treatments on day 3 when compared to initial concentrations on day 0 (Fig. 3d).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

a Concentration of COD remaining in synthetic brewery wastewater after treatment over time by P. ostreatus, T. versicolor and T. harzianum, b concentration of total nitrogen remaining in synthetic brewery wastewater after treatment over time by P. ostreatus, T. versicolor and T. harzianum. c Concentration of NH4 +-N remaining in synthetic brewery wastewater after treatment over time by P. ostreatus, T. versicolor and T. harzianum. d Concentration of PO4 3−-P remaining in synthetic brewery wastewater after treatment over time by P. ostreatus, T. versicolor and T. harzianum. e Variation of pH in synthetic brewery wastewater after treatment over time by P. ostreatus, T. versicolor and T. harzianum

All treatments resulted in a decreasing trend of COD concentrations over time (Fig. 3). On days 10 and 13, the remaining COD concentrations in the SBW were significantly lower when T. harzianum CBS 226.95 was applied compared to T. versicolor M9912 and P. ostreatus M2140. The maximum reduction of COD was 89.0% and was obtained on day 13 for T. harzianum CBS 226.95, while it was 67.1 and 62.9% for T. versicolor M9912 and P. ostreatus M2140, respectively.

For TN, there was no further decrease in concentration after day 3 and there was no significant difference between the treatments (Fig. 3b). Maximum reduction of TN was found in the T. harzianum CBS 226.95 treatment on day 6, corresponding to 53.9%. On day 13, the reduction of total nitrogen was 48.4% for P. ostreatus M2140, 43.0% for T. versicolor M9912 and 52.5% for T. harzianum CBS 226.95 when compared to the initial value. When NH4 +-N was measured, the three treatments displayed similar concentrations on day 3; however, they differed significantly on day 6 (Fig. 3c). For P. ostreatus M2140, the NH4 +-N concentration increased, while it was unaffected in the T. versicolor M9912 treatment and continued to decrease in the T. harzianum CBS 226.95 treatment during this period. The maximum reduction of NH4 +-N was found in the T. harzianum CBS 226.95 treatment, 66.1%, on day 6. There was no significant difference between the treatments as regards NH4 +-N concentration at day 13 (Fig. 3c).

Also, for PO4 3−-P there was no further decrease in concentration after day 3 and there was no significant difference between the treatments on days 3, 6 or 10 (Fig. 3d). The maximum reduction of PO4 3−-P was detected on day 10 in the P. ostreatus M2140 treatment (44.3%). On day 13, the reduction of PO4 3−-P was 44.0% for P. ostreatus M2140 and 39.5% for T. harzianum CBS 226.95, which were significantly higher than T. versicolor M9912 whose reduction value was 28.3%.

When treatment of the SBW with the dual culture (P. ostreatus M2140 and T. harzianum CBS 226.95) was compared to treatment with the single cultures (P. ostreatus M2140 and T. harzianum CBS 226.95, respectively), no significant differences were observed between treatments with regard to the remaining concentrations of TN and PO4 3−-P in the SBW. However, the remaining concentrations of COD and NH4 +-N were significantly lower in the SBW treated with T. harzianum CBS 226.95, either single or dual culture, compared to the single culture with P. ostreatus M2140 (Table 2).

Effect on pH

Initial pH in the SBW significantly decreased with treatments of T. versicolor M9912 or T. harzianum CBS 226.95, 4.2 ± 0.3 and 4.4 ± 0.5, respectively, while the treatment with P. ostreatus M2140 displayed no significant effects on initial pH, 6.4 ± 0.4. Generally, there was no significant difference between pH in the T. versicolor M9912 or T. harzianum CBS 226.95 treatments, while P. ostreatus M2140 had significantly higher pH throughout the study (Fig. 3e).

Discussion

The variation in biomass production between the different fungal strains reported in the present study demonstrates the different nutritional needs and adaptation capacities of these organisms. In all three experimental set-ups, P. ostreatus was observed to have the highest capacity for biomass production (Fig. 1; Fig. 2; Table 2), which is in line with the notion of this species being fast growing and easily cultivated (Cohen et al. 2002).

In a previous study focusing on liquid brewery waste, higher values of biomass production for P. ostreatus, ranging between 3 and 20 g dry weight biomass L−1, have been reported (Shannon and Stevenson 1975). However, in the cited study the selected brewery wastes contained 10–30 times more COD compared to the levels in the present study and their higher biomass yield is likely to be associated to the higher content of carbon available for fungal growth. This explanation possibly also applies to T. harzianum, which grew well in the present study (Fig. 1; Fig. 2). Nevertheless, biomass levels were almost five times lower compared to the maximum biomass value reported by Zhang et al. (2008). In their study, T. harzianum had grown for 24 h in winery wastewater with COD values that were two to four times higher compared to the levels in the present study. Thus, the higher T. harzianum biomass obtained by Zhang et al. (2008) could also partly be explained by the higher COD values.

As mentioned above, COD concentration is an important parameter which influences the amount of biomass produced. In the brewing process, wastewater is produced in different steps and the chemical composition of the effluent from the different processes varies (Simate et al. 2011). In the present study, the COD values in the SBW corresponds well with COD levels found in combined wastewater from different brewery processes and washings (Enitan et al. 2015). It is likely that higher fungal biomass production is possible working with selected waste streams such as effluents from fermentation process and filtering. In fact, considering first-order kinetics which is commonly used to evaluate and design wastewater treatments systems, nutrient removal is a direct function of nutrient concentration, i.e. higher nutrient concentration would result in higher nutrient removal rates and higher biomass production (Henze et al. 2002). Thus, a profitable solution for breweries that would decrease the techno-economic limitations of small-scale production of fungal biomass could be to keep wastewater from different brewing processes separated and apply optimized treatment for each specific wastewater stream. Consequently, by avoiding dilution of brewery wastewater both more efficient wastewater treatment and higher fungal biomass production could be achieved.

The Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management (HaV, Havs- och vattenmyndigheten 2016) states that 90% of the organic amount in the wastewater must be removed to adhere to current regulations for small-scale wastewater treatment systems. Despite producing a lower or similar biomass compared to the other fungal strains tested (Fig. 2), T. harzianum clearly displayed a superior ability over the other strains to reduce COD (Fig. 3). T. harzianum also seemed to be the driving force in achieving low COD levels, even in dual cultures (Table 2).Thus the capacity of T. harzianum to provide COD reductions of 79–89%, observed in the present study, shows a promising future application for small wastewater treatment systems, such as those at microbreweries. In the abovementioned study by Zhang et al. (2008), a COD reduction in the order of 86–91% was reported for T. viride, which further supports the interest of this genus in this regard. A high capacity for reduction of COD has also been demonstrated for T. versicolor and Singh (2006) reported 90% COD reduction by this species in anaerobically digested plant waste. In the present study, similar biomass production was observed between T. harzianum and T. versicolor; however as previously mentioned, a significantly higher reduction of COD was observed by T. harzianum.

No significant difference between the treatments was found for TN (Fig. 3b). Nevertheless, T. harzianum was the only fungus reaching more that 50% TN reduction, which is the legal measure set by the Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management (HaV, Havs- och vattenmyndigheten 2016) for TN removal by small-scale wastewater treatment systems. When the effect of the fungal treatments on NH4 +-N was investigated, variations between the species were observed and the highest reduction was obtained by T. harzianum (Fig. 3c). However, all treatments exhibited increasing concentrations of NH4 +-N over time, which was most likely due to mineralisation in the medium. As demonstrated in Fig. 4, the lower pH levels were associated with higher reductions in NH4+-N, which is in agreement with NH4 + being transported into the fungal cell as ammonia (NH3), leaving the hydrogen ion in the medium. Since the solubility/insolubility of many pollutants in wastewater is dependent on pH, this parameter may play an important role in the fungal treatment of different waste streams (Singh 2006). Finding optimum combinations of pH levels in the waste with the right fungal strain could hold the key to fine tuning the fungal treatment.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

Correlation between NH4 +-N reduction (%) and pH measured in synthetic brewery wastewater after treatment over time by P. ostreatus and T. harzianum, respectively

The different treatments showed no significant difference in their capacity to remove PO4 3−-P from the SBW (Fig. 3d). Generally, the minimum COD-to-phosphorus ratio (COD:P) in biological phosphorus treatment systems is 35 g COD per g phosphorus. Also, in order to stimulate luxury uptake of wastewater phosphorus by bacteria, supplementation with short-chain organics is necessary and costly. In the present study, the COD/phosphorus ratio had a decreasing trend over time for all strains, i.e. less organic matter was needed to attain the reductions of PO4 3−-P. Most striking was the decreasing COD/phosphorus ratio in the T. harzianum treatment from 90 on day 3 to 16 on day 13. This suggests that T. harzianum has a higher adaptation capacity compared to P. ostreatus and T. versicolor for an increase in carbon uptake, while keeping reduction of TN and PO4 3−-P at a relatively stable level. Guest and Smith (2007) reported a low COD/phosphorus ratio of 5 when different fungi were used to treat domestic wastewater. The cited study reported reductions of PO4 3-P in the range of those reported in the present study: 28.3–44%. Interestingly, a positive relationship between fungal cellular P content and increasing organic nitrogen in wastewater have been reported (Ye et al. 2015). Thus, fungi can display increasing P removal when applied to different waste streams. Consequently, in future applications, phosphorus reduction by fungi may play an important role in wastewater treatment systems, especially in systems where there is limited ability to provide the addition of appropriate organic matter in order to stimulate luxury uptake of phosphorus (Guest and Smith 2007).

According to Singh (2006), mixed fungal cultures can improve assimilation of nutrients and yield higher amounts of biomass. In the present study, a mixed culture of the main biomass-producing species, P. ostreatus, and the main COD-reducing species, T. harzianum, was tested. However, using dual fungal cultures had no advantages in the present study and in fact the dual culture had significantly lower biomass compared to the single cultures (Table 2). Furthermore, effects on water-quality parameters were not improved when using dual fungal cultures. Instead, using the single culture of T. harzianum in the SBW provided the most advantageous and cost-effective treatment method to achieve low levels of all the tested parameters.

In the present study very low growth was recorded for the edible species A. bisporus and L. edodes. Both species have been reported to grow under submerged conditions, and the strain A. bisporus MSU-2 has previously been reported to grow well in brewery waste liquor, reaching a biomass of 3–11 g L−1 (Shannon and Stevenson 1975; Tsivileva et al. 2010). Conversely, in the present study no biomass production was observed with A. bisporus (Fig. 1). Since many fungal traits such as nutrient uptake from different sources are strain specific (Singh 2006), the low biomass production might be explained by strain variation. Due to the low growth of these species, the only edible species that showed a capability for growth in the SBW was P. ostreatus. Neither T. harzianum nor T. versicolor are considered food sources, however both species are used on a large scale for various purposes. T. versicolor is a well-known laccase producer with possible biotechnological and pharmaceutical applications, and the main application of T. harzianum is as a biocontrol agent (Vinalea et al. 2008; Damle and Shukla 2010). Due to its high capability for reducing COD, the results from the present study suggest that T. harzianum is an interesting species to develop for brewery wastewater treatment. The produced biomass may then have biotechnological applications, e.g. in the production of enzymes or as ingredients in biomaterials.

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support given by the Ångpanneföreningens Research Foundation through grant number 15-430.

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

This study was funded by Ångpanneföreningens Research Foundation (Grant 15-430).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Brewers of Europe (2002) Guidance note for establishing BAT in the brewing industry. CBMC Brussels: Brewers of Europe. Europe, Brussels, Belgium
  2. Chanda A, Gummadidala PM, Gomaa OM. Mycoremediation with mycotoxin producers: a critical perspective. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;100:17–29. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-7032-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cohen R, Persky L, Hadar Y. Biotechnological applications and potential of wood-degrading mushrooms of the genus Pleurotus. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002;58:582–594. doi: 10.1007/s00253-002-0930-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Damle AJ, Shukla SR. Production of laccase from Coriolus versicolor and its application in dye decolorization in combination with UV/H2O2 technique. Clean Soil, Air, Water. 2010;38:663–669. [Google Scholar]
  5. Dhillon GS, Rosine GML, Kaur S, Hedge K, Brar SK, Drogui P, Verma M. Novel biomaterials from citric acid fermentation as biosorbents for removal of metals from waste chromated copper arsenate wood leachates. Int Biodeter Biodegr. 2016 [Google Scholar]
  6. Enitan AM, Adeyemo J, Kumari SFM, Bux F. Characterization of brewery wastewater composition. Int J Environ Chem Ecol Geol Geophys Eng. 2015;9:1073–1076. [Google Scholar]
  7. Fillaudeau L, Blanpain-Avet P, Daufin G. Water, wastewater and waste management in brewing industries. J Clean Prod. 2006;14:463–471. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.01.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Guest RK, Smith DW. Isolation and screening of fungi to determine potential for ammonia nitrogen treatment in wastewater. J Environ Engin Sci. 2007;6:209–217. doi: 10.1139/s06-050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hang YD, Splittstoesser DF, Woodams EE. Utilization of brewery spent grain liquor by Aspergillus niger. Appl Microbiol. 1975;30:879–888. doi: 10.1128/am.30.5.879-880.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HaV (Havs- och vattenmyndigheten) 2016. Havs- och vattenmyndighetens författningssamling, HVMFS 2016:17. < https://www.havochvatten.se/hav/vagledning--lagar/foreskrifter/register-avlopp/sma-avloppsanordningar-for-hushallsspillvatten-hvmfs-201617.html> (in Swedish)
  11. Henze M, Harremöes P, la Cour JJ, Arvin E. Wastewater treatment: biological and chemical processer. Third. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heideberg GmbH; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  12. ISO . Water quality—determination of ammonium—Part 1: manual spectrometric method (ISO 7150–1) Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 1984. [Google Scholar]
  13. ISO . Water quality—determination of the chemical oxygen demand (ISO 6060) Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 1989. [Google Scholar]
  14. ISO . Water quality—determination of nitrogen—Part 1: method using oxidative digestion with peroxodisulfate (ISO 11905-1) Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  15. ISO . Water quality—determination of phosphorus—ammonium molybdate spectrometric method (ISO 6878) Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  16. IVL (2002) Driftaspekter på kommunala avloppsreningsverk och bryggerier. IVL Svenska Miljöinstitutet AB, Stockholm. IVL Rapport/report B 1494. (in Swedish)
  17. Kuktaite R, Plivelic TS, Cerenius Y, Hedenqvist MS, Gallstedt M, Marttila S, Ignell R, Popineau Y, Tranquet O, Shewry P, Johansson E. Structure and morphology of wheat gluten films: from polymeric protein aggregates toward superstructure arrangements. Biomacromolecules. 2011;12:1438–1448. doi: 10.1021/bm200009h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kumirska J, Czerwicka M, Kaczynski Z, Bychowska A, Brzozowski K, Thoeming J, Stepnowski P. Application of spectroscopic methods for structural analysis of chitin and chitosan. Mar Drugs. 2010;8:1567–1636. doi: 10.3390/md8051567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Maier T. Selected aspect of the microbreweries boom. Agris On-Line Papers in Economics & Informatics. 2013;5:135–142. [Google Scholar]
  20. Mata TM, Melo AC, Simões M, Caetano NS. Parametric study of a brewery effluent treatment by microalgae Scenedesmus obliquus. Biores Technol. 2012;107:151–158. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.12.109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Olajire AA. The brewing industry and environmental challenges. J Clean Prod. 2012 [Google Scholar]
  22. Parenti A, Muguerza E, Iroz AR, Omarini A, Conde E, Alfaro M, Castanera R, Santoyo F, Ramirez L, Pisabarro AG. Induction of laccase activity in the white rot fungus Pleurotus ostreatus using water polluted with wheat straw extracts. Biores Technol. 2013;133:142–149. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Poppi DP, McLennan SR. Nutritional research to meet future challenges. Animal Prod Sci. 2010;50:329–338. doi: 10.1071/AN09230. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rao AG, Reddy TSK, Prakash SS, Vanajakshi J, Joseph J, Sarma PN. pH regulation of alkaline wastewater with carbon dioxid: a case study of treatment of brewery wastewater in UASB reactor coupled with absorber. Biores Technol. 2007;43:2131–2136. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sankaran S, Khanal SK, Jasti N, Jin B, Pometto AL, III, Van Leeuwen JH. Use of filamentous fungi for wastewater treatment and production of high value fungal byproducts: a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technology. 2010;40:400–449. doi: 10.1080/10643380802278943. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Schnell SM, Reese JF. Microbreweries as tools of local identity. J Cultural Geography. 2003;21:45–69. doi: 10.1080/08873630309478266. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Seluy LG, Isla MA. A process to treat high-strength brewery wastewater via ethanol recovery and vinasse fermentation. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2014;53:17043–17050. doi: 10.1021/ie500438j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Shannon JL, Stevenson KE. Growth of fungi and BOD reduction in selected brewery wastes. J Food Sci. 1975;40:826–829. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1975.tb00567.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Shao X, Peng D, Teng Z, Ju X. Treatment of brewery wastewater using anaerobic sequencing batch reactor (ASBR) Biores Technol. 2008;99:3182–3186. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.05.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Simate GS, Cluett J, Iyuke SE, Musapatika ET, Ndlovu S, Walubita LF, Alvarez AE. The treatment of brewery waste for reuse: state of the art. Desalination. 2011;273:235–247. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.02.035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Singh V. Mycoremediation: fungal bioremediation. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc.; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sudarjanto G, Sharma KR, Gutierrez O, Yuan Z. A laboratory assessment of the impact of brewery wastewater discharge on sulfide and methane production in a sewer. Water Sci Technol. 2011;64:1614–1619. doi: 10.2166/wst.2011.733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Tsivileva OM, Pankratov AN, Valentina EN. Extracellular protein production and morphogenesis of Lentinula edodes in submerged culture. Mycol Prog. 2010;9:157–167. doi: 10.1007/s11557-009-0614-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Tucker MF. Becoming a zero emissions brewery. Biocycle. 2007;48:29–32. [Google Scholar]
  35. Uduman N, Qi Y, Danquah MK, Forde GM, Hoadley A. Dewatering of microalgal cultures: a major bottleneck to algae-based fuels. J Renew Sustain Energy. 2010;2:012701. doi: 10.1063/1.3294480. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Vinalea F, Sivasithamparamb K, Ghisalbertic EL, Marraa R, Wooa SL, Loritoa M. Trichoderma–plant–pathogen interactions. Soil Biol Biochem. 2008;40:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.07.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Yang YG, Li WM (2002) Strategy for cleaner production in microbrewery. Conference Proceedings—Joint 2002 CSCE/ASCE International Conference on Environmental Engineering - An International Perspective on Environmental Engineering; Niagara Falls, Ont.; Canada; 21 July-24 July. School of Engineering, University of Guelph, Montréal, Canada. p 583
  38. Ye YL, Gan J, Hu B. Screening of phosphorus-accumulating fungi and their potential for phosphorus removal from waste streams. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2015;177:1127–1136. doi: 10.1007/s12010-015-1801-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhang ZY, Jin B, Bai ZH, Wang XY. Production of fungal biomass protein using microfungi from winery wastewater treatment. Biores Technol. 2008;99:3871–3876. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.10.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Zheng TL, Li P, Wang QH, Li XS, Ai HY, Gan KM, Sharavsambuu A. Pilot-scale experiments on brewery wastewater treatment and sludge reduction based on food chain predation. Desalin Water Treat. 2015;55:1142–1151. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES