Abstract
Objective
Telomere shortening occurs as an early event in pancreatic tumorigenesis and genetic variants at the telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) gene region have been associated with pancreatic cancer risk. However, it is unknown whether prediagnostic leukocyte telomere length is associated with subsequent risk of pancreatic cancer.
Design
We measured prediagnostic leukocyte telomere length in 386 pancreatic cancer cases and 896 matched controls from five prospective U.S. cohorts. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using conditional logistic regression. Matching factors included year of birth, cohort (which also matches on sex), smoking status, fasting status, and month/year of blood collection. We additionally examined single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at the TERT region in relation to pancreatic cancer risk and leukocyte telomere length, using logistic and linear regression, respectively.
Results
Shorter prediagnostic leukocyte telomere length was associated with higher risk of pancreatic cancer (comparing extreme quintiles of telomere length, OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.07–2.78; Ptrend=0.048). Results remained unchanged after adjustment for diabetes, body-mass index, and physical activity. Three SNPs at TERT (linkage disequilibrium r2<0.25) were associated with pancreatic cancer risk, including rs401681 (per minor allele OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.12–1.59; P=0.002), rs2736100 (per minor allele OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.13–1.63; P=0.001), and rs2736098 (per minor allele OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63–0.90; P=0.002). The minor allele for rs401681 was associated with shorter telomere length (P=0.023).
Conclusion
Prediagnostic leukocyte telomere length and genetic variants at the TERT gene region were associated with risk of pancreatic cancer.
Keywords: telomere length, pancreatic cancer, TERT, prospective cohort study
INTRODUCTION
Pancreatic cancer is the third-leading cause of cancer death in the United States.[1] The large number of deaths from pancreatic cancer is due in part to late diagnosis, with more than 80% of patients presenting with advanced, incurable disease.[2] To facilitate early detection, it is critical to identify those individuals at increased risk.[3] Nevertheless, known predisposing factors for pancreatic cancer, including obesity, diabetes, smoking, and chronic pancreatitis, are inadequate to meaningfully risk stratify the general population.[4]
Telomeres are DNA repeats at the ends of chromosomes with a critical role in maintaining genomic stability.[5] Human telomeres shorten with each cell division, and the rate of shortening across individuals is influenced by genetic and environmental factors.[6, 7] Interestingly, telomere shortening occurs as an early event in pancreatic tumorigenesis.[8, 9] The TERT gene at chromosome 5p15.33 encodes the catalytic subunit of telomerase reverse transcriptase, a component of the protein and RNA complex that maintains telomere ends. Recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified inherited genetic variation at the telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) gene region associated with risk of developing pancreatic cancer[10, 11] and several other malignancies.[12, 13] Nevertheless, the mechanisms by which common variants at the TERT gene region impact development of sporadic pancreatic cancer are unknown, and the role of leukocyte telomere length as a predictive marker for pancreatic cancer has not been extensively studied.[14, 15]
We examined prediagnostic leukocyte telomere length and subsequent risk of pancreatic cancer in five prospective U.S. cohorts with up to 26 years of follow-up since blood collection. We additionally investigated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at the TERT gene region and their relationship to leukocyte telomere length and pancreatic cancer risk.
METHODS
Study Participants
Pancreatic cancer cases and controls were included from five U.S. prospective cohorts. Briefly, the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) enrolled 121,700 female nurses aged 30–55 years in 1976. The Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS) enrolled 51,529 male health professionals aged 40–75 years in 1986. The Physicians’ Health Study I (PHS) is a randomized clinical trial of aspirin and β-carotene and enrolled 22,071 healthy male physicians aged 40–84 years in 1982. After the randomized trial ended, participants were followed as an observational cohort. The Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study (WHI-OS) enrolled 93,676 postmenopausal women aged 50–79 years between 1994 and 1998. The Women’s Health Study (WHS) is a randomized clinical trial of low-dose aspirin and vitamin E and enrolled 39,876 healthy female health professionals aged ≥45 years between 1992 and 1995. The trial was completed in 2004 and participants were followed as an observational cohort.
Blood samples were collected from 32,826 women in NHS from 1989–1990, 18,225 men in HPFS from 1993–1995, 14,916 men in PHS from 1982–1984, 93,676 women in WHI-OS from 1994–1998, and 28,345 women in WHS from 1992–1995. Individual characteristics and habits were obtained from baseline questionnaires in PHS, WHI-OS, and WHS and from questionnaires preceding blood draw in NHS and HPFS. This study was approved by the Human Research Committee at the Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, and participants provided informed consent.
Pancreatic Cancer Cases and Controls
We included pancreatic adenocarcinoma cases diagnosed through 2008 with available blood samples and no prior history of cancer, except non-melanoma skin cancer. Incident cases were identified by self-report or during follow-up of a participant’s death. Medical records of the cases were reviewed by study physicians blinded to exposure data. Eligible controls were cohort participants who provided a blood sample and were alive and free of cancer at the date of the case’s diagnosis. We randomly selected up to 3 controls for each case, matching on year of birth, prospective cohort (which matched on sex), smoking status (never, past, current), fasting status at blood collection (<8 hours, ≥8 hours), and month/year of blood collection.
The nested case-control set consisted of 472 pancreatic cancer cases and 1071 controls. Because telomere dynamics may differ across races/ethnicities [16, 17] and SNPs at the TERT gene region were identified in individuals of European descent,[10, 11] non-White subjects were excluded, resulting in 456 cases and 1035 matched controls. To minimize the influence of subclinical malignancy on leukocyte telomere length, we excluded case-control sets in which the pancreatic cancer case was diagnosed within 2 years of blood collection, resulting in 386 pancreatic cancer cases and 896 matched controls for analysis.
Prediagnostic Leukocyte Telomere Length Measurement
Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes using QIAmp (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA) 96-spin blood protocol. PicoGreen quantitation of genomic DNA was performed using Molecular Devices 96-well spectrophotometer. The ratio of telomere repeat copy number to a single gene copy number (T/S) was determined by modified, high-throughput [18] quantitative real-time PCR telomere assay [19] run Applied Biosystems 7900HT Sequence Detection System (Foster City, CA). Triplicate reactions were performed. Leukocyte relative telomere length is reported as exponentiated sample T/S ratio corrected for a reference sample. Telomere and single-gene assay coefficients of variation (CVs) for triplicates were 0.6% and 0.5%, respectively. CVs for the exponentiated T/S ratio were 12.9%.
SNP Selection and Genotyping
We genotyped four SNPs at the TERT gene region previously associated with cancer risk, including rs401681 (pancreatic cancer),[11] rs2736100 (glioma and lung cancer),[20, 21] rs402710 (lung cancer),[20] and rs2853676 (glioma).[21] DNA was extracted centrally from archived buffy coat samples with QIAGEN QIAmp and whole genome amplified with GE Healthcare Genomiphi. All genotyping was performed at Partners HealthCare Center for Personalized Genetic Medicine using a custom-designed Illumina Golden Gate genotyping assay. Replicate samples included for quality control (N=44 sample groups) had mean genotype concordance of 97.2% across the four SNPs. No SNPs deviated from Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium at P<0.01.
In addition, 644 pancreatic cancer cases and 1171 controls from the five cohorts were included in recent GWAS of pancreatic cancer (PanScan studies).[10, 11, 22] From these studies, we obtained SNP genotypes for our cohort participants to mark the six independent risk loci at TERT identified in a recent, large, multi-cancer analysis.[23] Genotyping and imputation methods in the PanScan studies have been described previously.[10] Among these subjects, 290 cases and 232 controls were included in the nested case-control study of telomere length. Supplementary Table 1 summarizes numbers of cases and controls with leukocyte telomere length, locally genotyped SNPs, and SNPs genotyped in PanScan.
Statistical Analysis
To standardize telomere length values, we calculated z scores (standard deviations from the mean) of log-transformed telomere length within each cohort. Participants were categorized into quintiles based on the z score distributions among all controls. To compute odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), we used conditional logistic regression. In multivariable models, we adjusted for history of diabetes (yes, no), body mass index (BMI, <18.5, 18.5–24.9, 25–29.9, ≥30 kg/m2), and physical activity (quartiles). P-values for trend were calculated by the Wald test of a score variable that contained median values of quintiles. Because two previous studies suggested a nonlinear relation between telomere length and pancreatic cancer risk,[14, 24] we tested nonlinearity using restricted cubic spline regression.[25] We conducted stratified analyses by sex, age at blood draw (<63, ≥63 years; median), smoking status (never, ever), and time between blood collection and cancer diagnosis (<6.7, ≥6.7 years; median). Tests for interaction were performed by the Wald test of cross-product terms.
Associations between SNPs at TERT and pancreatic cancer risk were examined by assigning a value of 0, 1, or 2 according to a participant’s number of minor alleles and including this genotype as a continuous variable (additive model) in logistic regression models. For analysis of SNPs in the nested case-control study, conditional logistic regression models were adjusted for the aforementioned covariates. For analyses of SNPs using PanScan genotypes in which no case-control matching was present, unconditional logistic regression models were adjusted for age and cohort. The association of SNPs with telomere length was assessed using linear regression, with models adjusted for age, case-control status, prospective cohort (also adjusts for sex), smoking status, history of diabetes, BMI, and physical activity using an additive genetic model. All analyses were performed with SAS 9.3 statistical package. All P-values were two-sided.
RESULTS
The median time from collection of DNA to cancer diagnosis was 6.7 years in cases. As expected, individuals with shorter telomere length were older and more likely to be current smokers (Table 1, characteristics among controls). The Spearman correlation coefficient between leukocyte telomere length and age was −0.14 (P<0.0001) among controls. Supplementary Table 2 showed the characteristics of pancreatic cancer cases and matched controls in each cohort.
Table 1.
Characteristic | Quintiles of leukocyte telomere length, z score
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q5 (longest) | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 (shortest) | |
No. of controls | 179 | 180 | 179 | 178 | 180 |
Age, years, mean (SD) | 61.1(8.3) | 61.1(8.5) | 61.9(9.1) | 63.8(9.2) | 64.1(8.6) |
Men, % | 35.8 | 35.2 | 35.7 | 35.2 | 34.6 |
Height, inches, mean (SD) | 66.5(3.5) | 66.2(3.8) | 66.7(3.9) | 66.5(3.7) | 66.7(3.8) |
Body mass index, kg/m2, mean (SD) | 25.7(4.8) | 26.1(4.6) | 25.6(4.2) | 25.1(3.7) | 25.6(4.0) |
Physical activity, MET-hr/week, mean (SD) | 20.5(21.3) | 21.5(23.9) | 20.2(26.3) | 20.5(29.4) | 18.0(22.6) |
Smoking status, % | |||||
Never | 43 | 49.6 | 42.1 | 40.3 | 42.2 |
Past | 43.6 | 37.1 | 44.7 | 47.2 | 39 |
Current | 13.4 | 13.3 | 13.2 | 12.5 | 18.8 |
History of diabetes mellitus, % | 4.4 | 4.2 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 5.4 |
Regular multivitamin use, % | 43 | 41.8 | 45.2 | 32.2 | 38.4 |
Alcohol (≥1 drink/day), % | 22.4 | 22.8 | 23.4 | 19.3 | 23.6 |
All variables were age- and study-standardized except age.
We observed a statistically significant inverse association between prediagnostic leukocyte telomere length and risk of pancreatic cancer (Table 2). Compared to the highest quintile of telomere length z score, individuals in quintiles four to one had multivariable ORs (95% CIs) of 1.35 (0.90–2.04), 1.23 (0.79–1.93), 1.27 (0.79–2.02), and 1.72 (1.07–2.78), respectively (Ptrend=0.048). Adjustment for history of diabetes, BMI, and physical activity did not materially alter the results (Table 2). Restricted cubic spline curve analysis was consistent with a linear relationship of telomere length and pancreatic cancer risk (Pnonlinearity>0.05). No statistically significant heterogeneity was observed across the five cohorts (Pheterogeneity=0.24). No statistically significant interaction was observed by sex, age at blood collection, smoking status, or time between blood collection and cancer diagnosis (all Pinteraction≥0.32).
Table 2.
Quintiles of leukocyte telomere length, z score
|
P-value, trend* |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q5 (longest) | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 (shortest) | ||
No. of cases | 64 | 84 | 72 | 71 | 95 | |
No. of controls | 179 | 180 | 179 | 178 | 180 | |
OR (95% CI)† | 1.0 | 1.35 (0.90–2.04) |
1.23 (0.79–1.93) |
1.27 (0.79–2.02) |
1.72 (1.07–2.78) |
0.048 |
OR (95% CI)‡ | 1.0 | 1.29 (0.85–1.96) |
1.20 (0.76–1.89) |
1.27 (0.80–2.04) |
1.67 (1.03–2.72) |
0.056 |
Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval
P-value for trend calculated by the Wald test of a score variable containing median values of quintiles.
Conditional logistic regression model conditioned on matching factors: year of birth, prospective cohort (HPFS, NHS, PHS, WHI-OS, WHS, which also matches on sex), smoking status (never, past, current), fasting status at blood collection (<8 hours, ≥8 hours), and month/year of blood collection.
Conditional logistic regression model conditioned on matching factors and adjusted for history of diabetes mellitus (yes, no), body-mass index (<18.5, 18.5–24.9, 25–29.9, ≥30 kg/m2), and physical activity (quartiles).
We genotyped four SNPs at the TERT gene region, including rs401681 that was associated with pancreatic cancer risk in the PanScan II GWAS [11] and three SNPs identified in GWAS of lung cancer and glioma,[20, 21] rs2736100, rs402710, and rs2853676. Two of these SNPs, rs401681 and rs2736100, were associated with pancreatic cancer risk in our nested case-control study at a Bonferroni-corrected P-value threshold of 0.0125 (0.05/4 SNPs) (Table 3). The per minor allele ORs were 1.33 (95% CI, 1.12–1.59) for rs401681 and 1.36 (95% CI, 1.13–1.63) for rs2736100. The PanScan III study identified a second independent locus at TERT marked by rs2736098,[10] and further studies have suggested multiple independent risk loci for cancer in this genomic region.[23, 26, 27, 28] Based on the six independent risk loci identified at TERT in a large multi-cancer analysis by Wang et al.,[23] we obtained PanScan genotypes marking these loci for cases and controls from our five cohorts. A SNP at one of the six loci was associated with pancreatic cancer risk to P<0.008 (0.05/6 SNPs), rs2736098 (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63–0.90; Table 4). A second SNP was nominally significant, rs451360 (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.00–1.43); this SNP is known from fine-mapping analyses to mark the same risk locus as rs401681.[23]
Table 3.
SNP | LD† r2 |
Major allele |
Minor allele |
Participants
|
MAF
|
Per minor allele OR (95% CI)* |
P-value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cases | Controls | Cases | Controls | ||||||
rs401681 | – | G | A | 362 | 846 | 0.47 | 0.40 | 1.33 (1.12–1.59) | 0.002 |
rs2736100 | 0.01 | C | A | 363 | 845 | 0.55 | 0.48 | 1.36 (1.13–1.63) | 0.001 |
rs402710 | 0.59 | G | A | 360 | 847 | 0.37 | 0.33 | 1.20 (1.00–1.44) | 0.047 |
rs2853676 | 0.007 | G | A | 363 | 841 | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.94 (0.76–1.15) | 0.540 |
Abbreviations: LD, linkage disequilibrium; MAF, minor allele frequency; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism
Conditional logistic regression model conditioned on matching factors (year of birth, prospective cohort, smoking status, fasting status, and month/year of blood draw) and adjusted for history of diabetes mellitus (yes, no), body-mass index (<18.5, 18.5–24.9, 25–29.9, ≥30 kg/m2) and physical activity (quartiles). OR reflects the odds ratio per minor allele in an additive genetic model.
Linkage disequilibrium of SNPs with rs401681 based on 1000G CEU data
Table 4.
Risk region |
SNP | Major allele |
Minor allele |
Participants
|
MAF
|
Per minor allele OR (95% CI)* |
P-value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cases | Controls | Cases | Controls | ||||||
1 | rs7726159 | C | A | 644 | 1171 | 0.33 | 0.34 | 0.97 (0.81–1.16) | 0.741 |
2 | rs451360 | C | A | 644 | 1171 | 0.24 | 0.22 | 1.20 (1.00–1.43) | 0.044 |
3 | rs2853677 | A | G | 644 | 1171 | 0.40 | 0.41 | 0.92 (0.79–1.08) | 0.320 |
4 | rs2736098 | C | T | 644 | 1171 | 0.23 | 0.28 | 0.75 (0.63–0.90) | 0.002 |
5 | rs13172201 | T | C | 644 | 1171 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 1.02 (0.84–1.25) | 0.808 |
6 | rs10069690 | C | T | 644 | 1171 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 1.00 (0.83–1.21) | 0.996 |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; MAF, minor allele frequency; OR, odds ratio; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism
Unconditional logistic regression model adjusted for age (continuous) and prospective cohort (HPFS, NHS, PHS, WHI-OS, WHS). OR reflects the odds ratio per minor allele in an additive genetic model.
We next evaluated the association of the three SNPs related to pancreatic cancer risk with leukocyte telomere length (Table 5). rs401681 was statistically significantly associated with leukocyte telomere length in linear regression models (P=0.023), although power was limited for rs2736098 due to modest overlap between the nested case-control and PanScan populations and lower minor allele frequency. For rs401681, the minor allele was associated with both shorter telomere length (Table 5) and increased risk of pancreatic cancer (Table 3).
Table 5.
SNP | Major allele |
Minor allele |
Subjects | β- value* |
SE | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
rs401681 | G | A | 1208 | −0.09 | 0.04 | 0.023 |
rs2736100 | C | A | 1208 | −0.04 | 0.04 | 0.394 |
rs2736098 | C | T | 522 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.519 |
Abbreviations: SE, standard error; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism
Linear regression model per SNP minor allele adjusted for age (continuous), case-control status, prospective cohort (HPFS, NHS, PHS, WHI-OS, WHS, also adjusts for sex), smoking status (never, past, current), history of diabetes mellitus (yes, no), body-mass index (<18.5, 18.5–24.9, 25–29.9, ≥30 kg/m2), and physical activity (quartiles) using an additive genetic model.
DISCUSSION
In this large prospective study of five U.S. cohorts, shorter prediagnostic leukocyte telomere length was associated with higher risk of developing pancreatic cancer, independent of known predisposing factors. Three SNPs at the TERT gene region were also associated with pancreatic cancer risk, including two SNPs identified in the PanScan genome-wide association studies.[10, 11] In our five cohorts, the minor allele of rs401681 was associated with both shorter leukocyte telomere length and higher risk of pancreatic cancer. In aggregate, these data implicate telomere maintenance in the development of pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, they support further investigation of non-invasive testing of telomere biology as a component of pancreatic cancer risk stratification strategies.
Large studies and meta-analyses have assessed the association of peripheral leukocyte telomere length and overall cancer risk, with inconsistent results.[29, 30, 31, 32] Initial studies suggested that shorter telomere length was associated with increased cancer risk and mortality, while others have suggested only an association of shorter telomere length with worse cancer survival.[32, 33] These inconsistencies may result from differences in study design and assay performance and the potential impact of confounding factors.[34] The kinetics of telomere loss appear to vary by timing of measurement before cancer diagnosis [35] and treatment after diagnosis,[36] impairing the ability to combine data from studies with different designs. In the current study, all blood samples were collected prospectively, >2 years prior to diagnosis, and before any cancer-directed treatments, limiting the impact of these factors on our results. Pooling data across studies and laboratories can be complex, due to methodological differences in measuring telomere length.[37] In the current study, all samples were analyzed together in the same laboratory, using the same analytic protocol. Confounding by exposures such as smoking and obesity may affect associations. We included multiple potential confounding factors in our multivariable-adjusted models, noting little change in our results. Notably, recent studies have constructed genetic scores based on the number of inherited telomere-shortening alleles and noted associations with cancer risk, suggesting an independent effect of telomere length on cancer risk.[38, 39, 40, 41]
Previous smaller studies focused on leukocyte telomere length and pancreatic cancer risk have yielded inconsistent results. In a hospital-based case-control study, shorter telomere length was associated with higher risk for pancreatic cancer across most of the distribution of length.[24] However, the temporality of this relationship could not be established due to the retrospective study design, with blood samples collected at the time of cancer diagnosis. A prospective study of 193 pancreatic cancer cases in the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention (ATBC) Study found that longer telomere length was associated with higher pancreatic cancer risk among individuals diagnosed within the first five years of blood collection.[15] However, this study was conducted among male smokers in Finland, limiting generalizability of the results. A prospective study in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) suggested no overall association of leukocyte telomere length and pancreatic cancer risk.[14] Secondary analyses suggested modest increases in risk for individuals with both short and long telomere length.
Telomere shortening is known to be present at the early stages of pancreatic tumorigenesis.[9, 42] When telomeres shorten to a critical length, the DNA damage response triggers senescence or apoptosis.[5] In preneoplastic cells, if protective mechanisms such as the p53 tumor-suppressor are inactive, the cell continues to proliferate and telomeres become extremely short, ultimately causing chromosomal instability and invasive malignancy.[5] Thus, telomere length in tissues may be important in determining whether preneoplastic lesions progress to invasive disease. Whether telomere length measured in white blood cells reflects telomere length in the pancreas is unknown. However, prior studies have indicated that telomere shortening proceeds at similar rates across human somatic tissues [43] and may be influenced by both genetic and environmental factors.[6, 7]
The TERT gene encodes the catalytic subunit of telomerase reverse transcriptase, a component of the protein and RNA complex that maintains telomere ends. SNPs at chromosome 5p15.33, adjacent to or within the TERT gene, are associated with development of multiple malignancies.[26, 44] Previously, the PanScan studies observed altered pancreatic cancer risk in association with two independent loci at the TERT gene region marked by rs401681 [11] and rs2736098.[10] In the present study, we observed similar associations of pancreatic cancer risk with these two SNPs, and also noted an association of a third SNP (rs2736100) in low LD with the others. Of these SNPs, rs401681 was also associated with leukocyte telomere length, such that the minor allele at rs401681 was associated with higher pancreatic cancer risk and shorter telomere length. Similarly, multiple independent variants have been identified at the TERT gene region related to breast and ovarian cancer risk, with a subset of these variants also associated with leukocyte telomere length.[26] Similar to our results related to pancreatic cancer, the minor allele at the locus represented by rs2736098 was associated with longer telomeres and lower risk of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Furthermore, the A allele at rs2736100 was associated with shorter telomere length in a prior GWAS [45] and with increased pancreatic cancer risk in the current study. In aggregate, these data suggest that SNPs at the TERT gene region might be associated with shorter telomere length and higher risk of pancreatic cancer.
Strengths of the present study include the prospective design, large sample size for studies of pancreatic cancer, and long, nearly complete follow-up. The exclusion of cases diagnosed within 2 years of blood draw further minimized potential bias due to reverse causation. The multi-dimensional data from the five cohorts provided a unique opportunity to conduct integrative analyses of leukocyte telomere length, SNPs at the TERT gene region, and pancreatic cancer risk. The extensive covariate data from these cohorts also allowed for rigorous control of potential confounding and evaluation of effect modification.
A limitation of our study was an inability to assess risk related to telomere attrition rate, as we were only able to measure telomere length at one point in time. However, most prospective studies have evaluated outcomes related to a one-time telomere length measurement, and whether longitudinal measurement will better predict cancer risk is unknown. We cannot be certain that leukocyte telomere length reflects telomere length in pancreatic tissue. However, telomere length is highly synchronized in fetal tissues [46] and among white blood cells, umbilical artery cells, and skin cells at birth,[17, 47, 48] and inter-individual variation in telomere length far exceeds variation between different tissues from the same individual.[17, 48] A recent study also showed that the rate of telomere shortening was similar across leukocytes, skin, skeletal muscle, and subcutaneous fat,[43] suggesting that blood serves as an adequate proxy for peripheral tissues. Although the blood samples were collected from different cohorts, it is unlikely that differences in blood collection affected the quality of the genomic DNA because genomic DNA is coiled around histones and very stable when housed in intact nuclei of cells, even when frozen. Furthermore, the effect of potential differences in the handling of biological materials between studies would likely be mitigated because the T/S ratios from each study were normalized using Z-scores, which ranks each participant in each study by telomere length based on their respective distributions. Finally, our study population consisted only of White participants, so we were not able to examine other ethnic groups.
In conclusion, in this large study of five prospective cohorts, we found that shorter leukocyte telomere length and genetic variants at the TERT gene locus were associated with higher subsequent risk of pancreatic cancer. Overall, these data support a role for telomere maintenance in development of pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, they suggest that further investigation of non-invasive testing related to telomere biology may have potential as a component of pancreatic cancer risk stratification strategies.
Supplementary Material
Summary Box.
What is already known about this subject
Telomere shortening occurs as an early event in pancreatic tumorigenesis and genetic variants at the telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) gene region have been associated with pancreatic cancer risk.
However, the mechanisms by which common variants at the TERT gene region impact development of sporadic pancreatic cancer are unknown, and the role of leukocyte telomere length as a predictive marker for pancreatic cancer has not been extensively studied.
What are the new findings
We found that shorter prediagnostic leukocyte telomere length was associated with increased risk of pancreatic cancer.
Three SNPs at the TERT gene region were associated with pancreatic cancer risk, including rs401681, rs2736100, and rs2736098.
Interestingly, the minor allele for rs401681 was associated with shorter telomere length and increased risk of pancreatic cancer.
How might it impact on clinical practice in the foreseeable future?
The findings from this study, along with data from previous tumor tissue and genetic studies, strongly implicate telomere maintenance in the development of pancreatic cancer.
These findings strongly support further investigation of non-invasive testing of telomere biology as a component of pancreatic cancer risk stratification strategies.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the participants and staff of the Nurses’ Health Study, Health Professionals Follow-up Study, Physicians’ Health Study, Women’s Health Initiative and Women’s Health Study, for their contributions as well as the following state cancer registries for their help: AL, AZ, AR, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, ID, IL, IN, IA, KY, LA, ME, MD, MA, MI, NE, NH, NJ, NY, NC, ND, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, TN, TX, VA, WA, WY. The authors assume full responsibility for analyses and interpretation of these data.
Funding/Support:
NHS is supported by NIH grants UM1 CA186107, P01 CA87969, and R01 CA49449. HPFS is supported by NIH grant UM1 CA167552. PHS is supported by NIH grants CA 97193, CA 34944, CA 40360, HL 26490, and HL 34595. The WHI program is funded by the NIH through contracts N01WH22110, 24152, 32100–2, 32105–6, 32108–9, 32111–13, 32115, 32118–32119, 32122, 42107–26, 42129–32, and 44221. WHS is supported by NIH grants CA047988, HL043851, and HL080467.
Additional support from KL2/Catalyst Medical Research Investigator Training award (an appointed KL2 award) from Harvard Catalyst | The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, NIH KL2 TR001100) to YB; from the Robert T. and Judith B. Hale Fund for Pancreatic Cancer, Perry S. Levy Fund for Gastrointestinal Cancer Research, Pappas Family Research Fund for Pancreatic Cancer, NIH R01 CA124908, and NIH P50 CA127003 to CSF; NIH R35 CA197735 to SO; and from Department of Defense CA130288, Lustgarten Foundation, NIH/NCI K07 CA140790, the Noble Effort Fund, the Peter R. Leavitt Family Fund, and Promises for Purple to BMW.
Role of the Sponsor: The sponsors did not participate in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.
Abbreviations
- ATBC
Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention
- BMI
body mass index
- CV
coefficient of variation
- CI
confidence interval
- EPIC
European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition
- GWAS
genome-wide association studies
- HPFS
Health Professionals Follow-up Study
- LD
linkage disequilibrium
- MAF
minor allele frequency
- NHS
Nurses’ Health Study
- OR
odds ratio
- PHS
Physicians’ Health Study I
- SNP
single nucleotide polymorphism
- TERT
telomerase reverse transcriptase
- WHI-OS
Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study
- WHS
Women’s Health Study
Footnotes
Author Contributions:
Dr. Bao had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Study concept and design: Bao, Wolpin
Acquisition of data: Kraft, Buring, Cochrane, Gaziano, Manson, Rohan, Sesso, Stampfer, Fuchs, De Vivo, Amundadottir, Wolpin
Analysis and interpretation of data: Bao, Prescott, Yuan, Zhang, Kraft, Babic, Morales-Oyarvide, Qian, Buring, Cochrane, Gaziano, Giovannucci, Manson, Ng, Ogino, Rohan, Sesso, Stampfer, Fuchs, De Vivo, Amundadottir, Wolpin
Drafting of the manuscript: Bao, Wolpin
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Bao, Prescott, Yuan, Zhang, Kraft, Babic, Morales-Oyarvide, Qian, Buring, Cochrane, Gaziano, Giovannucci, Manson, Ng, Ogino, Rohan, Sesso, Stampfer, Fuchs, De Vivo, Amundadottir, Wolpin
Statistical analysis: Bao
Obtained funding: Fuchs, Wolpin
Administrative, technical, or material support: Prescott, Yuan, Zhang
Study supervision: Wolpin
No conflicts of interest exist.
References
- 1.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Vincent A, Herman J, Schulick R, Hruban RH, Goggins M. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet. 2011;378:607–20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62307-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lennon AM, Wolfgang CL, Canto MI, Klein AP, Herman JM, Goggins M, et al. The early detection of pancreatic cancer: what will it take to diagnose and treat curable pancreatic neoplasia? Cancer Res. 2014;74:3381–9. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Klein AP, Lindstrom S, Mendelsohn JB, Steplowski E, Arslan AA, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, et al. An absolute risk model to identify individuals at elevated risk for pancreatic cancer in the general population. PLoS One. 2013;8:e72311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Stewart SA, Weinberg RA. Telomeres: cancer to human aging. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2006;22:531–57. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.22.010305.104518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Slagboom PE, Droog S, Boomsma DI. Genetic determination of telomere size in humans: a twin study of three age groups. Am J Hum Genet. 1994;55:876–82. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Valdes AM, Andrew T, Gardner JP, Kimura M, Oelsner E, Cherkas LF, et al. Obesity, cigarette smoking, and telomere length in women. Lancet. 2005;366:662–4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66630-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hezel AF, Kimmelman AC, Stanger BZ, Bardeesy N, Depinho RA. Genetics and biology of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Genes Dev. 2006;20:1218–49. doi: 10.1101/gad.1415606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.van Heek NT, Meeker AK, Kern SE, Yeo CJ, Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL, et al. Telomere shortening is nearly universal in pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Pathol. 2002;161:1541–7. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64432-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wolpin BM, Rizzato C, Kraft P, Kooperberg C, Petersen GM, Wang Z, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies multiple susceptibility loci for pancreatic cancer. Nat Genet. 2014;46:994–1000. doi: 10.1038/ng.3052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Petersen GM, Amundadottir L, Fuchs CS, Kraft P, Stolzenberg-Solomon RZ, Jacobs KB, et al. A genome-wide association study identifies pancreatic cancer susceptibility loci on chromosomes 13q22.1, 1q32.1 and 5p15. 33. Nat Genet. 2010;42:224–8. doi: 10.1038/ng.522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rafnar T, Sulem P, Stacey SN, Geller F, Gudmundsson J, Sigurdsson A, et al. Sequence variants at the TERT-CLPTM1L locus associate with many cancer types. Nat Genet. 2009;41:221–7. doi: 10.1038/ng.296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mocellin S, Verdi D, Pooley KA, Landi MT, Egan KM, Baird DM, et al. Telomerase reverse transcriptase locus polymorphisms and cancer risk: a field synopsis and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104:840–54. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Campa D, Mergarten B, De Vivo I, Boutron-Ruault MC, Racine A, Severi G, et al. Leukocyte telomere length in relation to pancreatic cancer risk: a prospective study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23:2447–54. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lynch SM, Major JM, Cawthon R, Weinstein SJ, Virtamo J, Lan Q, et al. A prospective analysis of telomere length and pancreatic cancer in the alpha-tocopherol beta-carotene cancer (ATBC) prevention study. Int J Cancer. 2013 doi: 10.1002/ijc.28272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Diez Roux AV, Ranjit N, Jenny NS, Shea S, Cushman M, Fitzpatrick A, et al. Race/ethnicity and telomere length in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Aging Cell. 2009;8:251–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2009.00470.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hunt SC, Chen W, Gardner JP, Kimura M, Srinivasan SR, Eckfeldt JH, et al. Leukocyte telomeres are longer in African Americans than in whites: the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Family Heart Study and the Bogalusa Heart Study. Aging Cell. 2008;7:451–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2008.00397.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wang H, Chen H, Gao X, McGrath M, Deer D, De Vivo I, et al. Telomere length and risk of Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2008;23:302–5. doi: 10.1002/mds.21867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cawthon RM. Telomere measurement by quantitative PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:e47. doi: 10.1093/nar/30.10.e47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.McKay JD, Hung RJ, Gaborieau V, Boffetta P, Chabrier A, Byrnes G, et al. Lung cancer susceptibility locus at 5p15. 33. Nat Genet. 2008;40:1404–6. doi: 10.1038/ng.254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Shete S, Hosking FJ, Robertson LB, Dobbins SE, Sanson M, Malmer B, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies five susceptibility loci for glioma. Nat Genet. 2009;41:899–904. doi: 10.1038/ng.407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Amundadottir L, Kraft P, Stolzenberg-Solomon RZ, Fuchs CS, Petersen GM, Arslan AA, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies variants in the ABO locus associated with susceptibility to pancreatic cancer. Nat Genet. 2009;41:986–90. doi: 10.1038/ng.429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wang Z, Zhu B, Zhang M, Parikh H, Jia J, Chung CC, et al. Imputation and subset-based association analysis across different cancer types identifies multiple independent risk loci in the TERT-CLPTM1L region on chromosome 5p15. 33. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23:6616–33. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Skinner HG, Gangnon RE, Litzelman K, Johnson RA, Chari ST, Petersen GM, et al. Telomere length and pancreatic cancer: a case-control study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012;21:2095–100. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Durrleman S, Simon R. Flexible regression models with cubic splines. Stat Med. 1989;8:551–61. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780080504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bojesen SE, Pooley KA, Johnatty SE, Beesley J, Michailidou K, Tyrer JP, et al. Multiple independent variants at the TERT locus are associated with telomere length and risks of breast and ovarian cancer. Nat Genet. 2013;45:371–84. 84e1–2. doi: 10.1038/ng.2566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kote-Jarai Z, Saunders EJ, Leongamornlert DA, Tymrakiewicz M, Dadaev T, Jugurnauth-Little S, et al. Fine-mapping identifies multiple prostate cancer risk loci at 5p15, one of which associates with TERT expression. Hum Mol Genet. 2013;22:2520–8. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Campa D, Rizzato C, Stolzenberg-Solomon R, Pacetti P, Vodicka P, Cleary SP, et al. TERT gene harbors multiple variants associated with pancreatic cancer susceptibility. Int J Cancer. 2015;137:2175–83. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Willeit P, Willeit J, Mayr A, Weger S, Oberhollenzer F, Brandstatter A, et al. Telomere length and risk of incident cancer and cancer mortality. JAMA. 2010;304:69–75. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ma H, Zhou Z, Wei S, Liu Z, Pooley KA, Dunning AM, et al. Shortened telomere length is associated with increased risk of cancer: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2011;6:e20466. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wentzensen IM, Mirabello L, Pfeiffer RM, Savage SA. The association of telomere length and cancer: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:1238–50. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Weischer M, Nordestgaard BG, Cawthon RM, Freiberg JJ, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Bojesen SE. Short telomere length, cancer survival, and cancer risk in 47102 individuals. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105:459–68. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zhang C, Chen X, Li L, Zhou Y, Wang C, Hou S. The Association between Telomere Length and Cancer Prognosis: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0133174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Savage SA, Gadalla SM, Chanock SJ. The long and short of telomeres and cancer association studies. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105:448–9. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hou L, Joyce BT, Gao T, Liu L, Zheng Y, Penedo FJ, et al. Blood Telomere Length Attrition and Cancer Development in the Normative Aging Study Cohort. EBioMedicine. 2015;2:591–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.04.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Benitez-Buelga C, Sanchez-Barroso L, Gallardo M, Apellaniz-Ruiz M, Inglada-Perez L, Yanowski K, et al. Impact of chemotherapy on telomere length in sporadic and familial breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;149:385–94. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-3246-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Martin-Ruiz CM, Baird D, Roger L, Boukamp P, Krunic D, Cawthon R, et al. Reproducibility of telomere length assessment: an international collaborative study. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44:1673–83. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Iles MM, Bishop DT, Taylor JC, Hayward NK, Brossard M, Cust AE, et al. The effect on melanoma risk of genes previously associated with telomere length. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106 doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Rode L, Nordestgaard BG, Bojesen SE. Peripheral blood leukocyte telomere length and mortality among 64,637 individuals from the general population. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107:djv074. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zhang C, Doherty JA, Burgess S, Hung RJ, Lindstrom S, Kraft P, et al. Genetic determinants of telomere length and risk of common cancers: a Mendelian randomization study. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24:5356–66. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddv252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Machiela MJ, Lan Q, Slager SL, Vermeulen RC, Teras LR, Camp NJ, et al. Genetically predicted longer telomere length is associated with increased risk of B-cell lymphoma subtypes. Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25:1663–76. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddw027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Matsuda Y, Ishiwata T, Izumiyama-Shimomura N, Hamayasu H, Fujiwara M, Tomita K, et al. Gradual telomere shortening and increasing chromosomal instability among PanIN grades and normal ductal epithelia with and without cancer in the pancreas. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0117575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Daniali L, Benetos A, Susser E, Kark JD, Labat C, Kimura M, et al. Telomeres shorten at equivalent rates in somatic tissues of adults. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1597. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Walsh KM, Codd V, Smirnov IV, Rice T, Decker PA, Hansen HM, et al. Variants near TERT and TERC influencing telomere length are associated with high-grade glioma risk. Nat Genet. 2014;46:731–5. doi: 10.1038/ng.3004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Codd V, Nelson CP, Albrecht E, Mangino M, Deelen J, Buxton JL, et al. Identification of seven loci affecting mean telomere length and their association with disease. Nat Genet. 2013;45:422–7. 7e1–2. doi: 10.1038/ng.2528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Youngren K, Jeanclos E, Aviv H, Kimura M, Stock J, Hanna M, et al. Synchrony in telomere length of the human fetus. Hum Genet. 1998;102:640–3. doi: 10.1007/s004390050755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kimura M, Gazitt Y, Cao X, Zhao X, Lansdorp PM, Aviv A. Synchrony of telomere length among hematopoietic cells. Exp Hematol. 2010;38:854–9. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2010.06.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Okuda K, Bardeguez A, Gardner JP, Rodriguez P, Ganesh V, Kimura M, et al. Telomere length in the newborn. Pediatr Res. 2002;52:377–81. doi: 10.1203/00006450-200209000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.