Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 26.
Published in final edited form as: J Perinatol. 2017 Jan 26;37(6):641–644. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.274

Association of in utero magnesium exposure and spontaneous intestinal perforations in extremely low birth weight infants

L Corbin Downey 1, C Michael Cotten 2, Christoph P Hornik 2, Matthew M Laughon 3, Veeral N Tolia 4, Reese H Clark 5, P Brian Smith 2
PMCID: PMC5446291  NIHMSID: NIHMS832204  PMID: 28125094

Abstract

Objective

Determine whether antenatal exposure to magnesium is associated with spontaneous intestinal perforation in extremely low birth weight infants (≤1000 g).

Study Design

We identified all extremely low birth weight infants admitted to one of 323 neonatal intensive care units from 2007 to 2013. We used multivariable conditional logistic regression to compare outcomes in the first 21 days after birth between infants exposed and unexposed to magnesium in utero.

Results

Of the 28,035 infants, 11,789 (42%) were exposed to antenatal magnesium. There was no difference in the risk of spontaneous intestinal perforation, odds ratio=1.08 (95% confidence interval; 0.91–1.29), between infants exposed and unexposed to antenatal magnesium. Mortality in the first 21 days after birth was lower in the magnesium exposed infants, odds ratio=0.76 (0.70–0.83).

Conclusion

Antenatal magnesium exposure in extremely low birth weight infants was not associated with increased risk of spontaneous intestinal perforation.

Keywords: neonate, safety, antenatal

INTRODUCTION

Antenatal magnesium (AM) has several uses including seizure prophylaxis for mothers with preeclampsia, tocolysis, and, most recently, neuroprophylaxis for premature infants.(17) AM is beneficial in stopping the progression from preeclampsia to eclampsia.(7) The evidence is inconclusive in regards to its use for tocolysis, with a systematic review concluding no benefit in preventing premature birth.(6) Over the past several years, there has been a growing body of evidence to suggest that AM is effective in improving neurologic outcomes in premature infants.(3, 5, 8)

Magnesium acts as an enzyme cofactor and is involved in the function of the ATPase sodium-potassium pump. Magnesium is also a central nervous system depressant and inhibits peripheral neuromuscular transmissions, impairing intestinal tract motility and function. Data are mixed on the effect of AM on the gastrointestinal system. A delay in first stool has been observed in premature infants exposed to AM for maternal preeclampsia in some studies(9), though not in others.(1012) AM has not been shown to affect neonatal intestinal blood flow,(13) meconium plug syndrome,(14) or necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC).(3, 5) However, the relationship between magnesium and spontaneous intestinal perforations (SIPs) has not been widely investigated.

At our institution, we observed an increased risk of SIPs in premature infants following the initiation of AM administration for neuroprophylaxis.(15) Here, we evaluated a large multicenter cohort to determine if AM exposure was associated with SIP or death in extremely low birth weight infants (ELBW, ≤1000 g birth weight).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Study Design and Setting

We used a database derived from electronic medical records generated by clinicians on all infants cared for by the Pediatrix Medical Group in 323 neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in North America. Data on multiple aspects of care were entered into a shared electronic medical record to generate admission, daily progress notes, and discharge summaries. Information regarding maternal history, demographics, medications, laboratory results, diagnoses, and procedures was then transferred to the Pediatrix Clinical Data Warehouse for quality improvement and research purposes. [9] We included 28,035 ELBW infants discharged between 1997 and 2013. We excluded outborn infants and those with severe congenital anomalies. The study was approved by the Duke University Institutional Review Board.

Definitions and Participants

We defined AM exposure as an infant with AM exposure for any reason prior to delivery. The primary outcome was defined as the occurrence of a SIP in the first 21 days after birth. Secondary outcomes included the diagnoses of surgical or medical NEC, death, grade 3 or 4 intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), and the combined outcome of SIP, NEC, or death in the first 21 days after birth. We defined postnatal exposure to hydrocortisone or indomethacin/ibuprofen as either exposure prior to an outcome, or exposure in the first 21 days after birth if an infant did not experience an outcome. Given that the diagnoses of SIP and surgical NEC sometimes overlap, an infant who was diagnosed with both had the episode classified as surgical NEC. Likewise, if an infant had both medical NEC and surgical NEC diagnoses, the episode was classified as surgical NEC.

Statistical Methods

The unit of observation for this analysis was the infant. We compared demographic distributions among infants with and without AM exposure using Fisher’s exact test. We used conditional logistic regression conditioned on site to account for the clustered nature of the data to evaluate the association between AM exposure and the outcomes of SIP, NEC, death, IVH or the combined outcome of SIP, NEC or death. All models were adjusted for gestational age at birth, multiple gestation, antenatal steroid exposure, antenatal antibiotic exposure, prolonged rupture of membranes, small for gestational age, gender, postnatal hydrocortisone exposure, postnatal indomethacin exposure, and year. STATA 14 (College Station, TX) was used to perform the statistical analysis. For inquiries into the availability of the code please contact the corresponding author. A p<0.05 was considered statistically significant for all tests.

RESULTS

Of 28,035 ELBW infants admitted to the NICU during the study period, 11,789 (42%) were exposed to AM (Table 1). Demographic characteristics were similar between those exposed and unexposed to AM, except for the administration of antenatal steroids (94% in AM group versus 70% in unexposed group) and antenatal antibiotics (55% in AM group versus 35% unexposed group [Table 1]). The median birth weight for infants exposed and not exposed to AM was 775 g (25th, 75th%tile; 650, 890) and 767 g (630, 890). The median gestational age for infants exposed to AM was 26 weeks (25th, 75th%tile; 25, 27) and not exposed to AM was 26 weeks (24, 27). Use of AM increased over time; 28% of ELBW infants were exposed to AM in 2007, and 56% of ELBW infants were exposed in 2013.

Table 1.

Demographics

Magnesium exposed(%)
N=11,789
Unexposed (%)
N=16,246
Gestation (weeks)
 < 26    5165 (44%)    7346 (45%)
 26–28    5400 (46%)    6781 (42%)
 ≥ 29    1224 (10%)    2109 (13%)
Birth weight (g)
 ≤ 750    5374 (46%)    7683 (47%)
 751–1000    6415 (54%)    8563 (53%)
Race/Ethnicity
 White    4902 (42%)    6442 (40%)
 Black    3892 (33%)    5187 (32%)
 Hispanic    2011 (17%)    3151 (19%)
 Other      647 (5%)      845 (5%)
Multiple gestation    2072 (18%)    2576 (16%)
Male    5802 (49%)    8080 (50%)
PROM    1579 (13%)    2467 (15%)
Antenatal steroids 11,098 (94%) 11,336 (70%)
Antenatal antibiotics    6451 (55%)    5697 (35%)
Postnatal hydrocortisone      888 (8%)    1374 (8%)
Postnatal indomethacin    2369 (20%)    3045 (19%)

PROM: prolonged rupture of membranes

There were a total of 710 infants with SIPs, 340/11,789 (2.9 %) in the AM exposed and 370/16,246 (2.3%) in the unexposed group. Of the 710 infants with SIPs, 73% were ≤ 26 weeks gestational age. There was no significant difference in the adjusted odds of SIPs between infants exposed and unexposed to AM, odds ratio =1.08 (95% confidence interval; 0.91–1.29). Given recent concerns about misclassification of subjects with both SIP and surgical NEC diagnoses, we performed an additional analysis where all infants with both diagnoses were classified as a case of SIP.(16) This yielded similar results with an odds ratio of 1.05 (95% confidence interval; 0.89–1.50). Results were similar when adjusted analyses was repeated after excluding infants with unknown survival status at hospital discharge, odds ratio=0.98 (0.80–1.19). There were a total of 3887 infant deaths in the first 21 days after birth and infants exposed to AM had lower mortality, odds ratio=0.76 (0.70–0.83) (Table 2). There was no difference in medical NEC, surgical NEC, or IVH between the 2 groups.

Table 2.

Outcomes in the magnesium exposed and unexposed group *p<0.05

Magnesium
N=11,789
No Magnesium
N=16,246
Adjusted OR**
(95% CI)
SIP   340 (2.9%)   370 (2.3%) 1.08 (0.91, 1.29)
Death 1338 (11.4%) 2549 (15.7%) 0.76 (0.70, 0.83)*
Surgical NEC   143 (1.2%)   253 (1.6%) 0.84 (0.66, 1.05)
Medical NEC   191 (1.6%)   270 (1.7%) 1.11 (0.89, 1.37)
Death, NEC, or SIP 1882 (16.0%) 3248 (20.0%) 0.84 (0.77, 0.90)*
IVH (Grade 3 or 4) 1219 (10.3%) 1889 (11.6%) 0.97 (0.88, 1.06)

CI: confidence interval; IVH: intraventricular hemorrhage; NEC: necrotizing enterocolitis; SIP: Spontaneous intestinal perforation; OR: odds ratio

**

adjusted for site, gestational age at birth, multiple gestation, antenatal steroid exposure, antenatal antibiotic exposure, prolonged rupture of membranes, small for gestational age, sex, discharge year, postnatal hydrocortisone exposure, and postnatal indomethacin exposure

DISCUSSION

Current obstetrical practice is to use AM for seizure prophylaxis in preeclampsia, tocolysis, and most recently, neuroprophylaxis for mothers at imminent risk of premature delivery. With this new indication, increasing numbers of premature infants are exposed to AM. At our institution we noticed an increase in SIP in ELBW infants after the initiation of magnesium for neuroprophylaxis, a complication that, to our knowledge, has not been described in the literature.(15) In the present study, 11,789 of 28,035 (42%) ELBW infants were exposed to AM. We did not observe an association between AM exposure and SIPs in ELBW infants.

SIP is recognized as an entity separate from NEC. The pathophysiology of SIP is not fully understood; possible causes include decreased gastrointestinal perfusion, thinning of the intestinal lining, and administration of certain medications such as steroids or indomethacin.(17) SIP is most common in ELBW infants, with an incidence ranging from 2.2% to 8.4%.(1820) At our institution, we examined the risk of SIP before and after initiation of routine AM neuroprophylaxis protocol, after noting a cluster of perforations among our ELBW infants. Prior to the AM neuroprophylaxis protocol, 51% of the ELBW infants were exposed to AM compared to 78% after its implementation. The incidence of SIPs in ELBWs increased from 12% to 30% (p=0.09) with the implementation of AM use for neuroprophylaxis.(15) This observation led us to conduct this multicenter retrospective study evaluating the association between SIP and AM exposure across the Pediatrix network. The incidence of SIP in this cohort (2.5%) was on the lower side of the range reported in the literature (1820) and we found no difference in the adjusted risk of SIP between infants exposed and unexposed. Uncontrolled or unknown causes of SIP may explain the different results between these cohorts.

Unlike SIP, NEC has been a commonly reported outcome in trials investigating the use of AM magnesium for neuroprophylaxis. Several randomized control trials showed no significant difference in the incidence of NEC between placebo and AM treatment groups.(3, 5, 8) Our findings are consistent with these previous studies, showing no increase in NEC. However, when interpreting these data, there is the possibility that some infants with NEC were transferred to other centers for more specialized or surgical care prior to their NEC diagnosis, which may decrease the total number of NEC cases in this cohort.

IVH may increase the risk of cerebral palsy,(2124) which could influence the neuroprotective effect of magnesium. Previous reports showed no difference in IVH in infants exposed to AM versus those unexposed.(3, 5, 8, 25, 26) This study supports the previous literature with no significant difference in IVH between the two groups.

The initial randomized controlled study to evaluate the use of AM to decrease cerebral palsy was stopped prior to completion due to an increase in total pediatric deaths in the group exposed to high doses of magnesium (greater than 50 grams) (risk difference 15.2%; 95% CI 4.4–26.0, p=0.01).(27) However, none of the 3 completed randomized controlled studies had a significant increase in deaths.(3, 5, 8) It should be noted that these 4 studies all used different magnesium doses, with the study that ended prematurely using some of the highest doses.(3, 5, 8, 27) In our study, we saw a decrease in death in the first 21 days after birth in the exposure group (5.7% versus 8.2%, p<0.05). This finding should be interpreted with caution, as we do not have any data on dosing, timing, or indication for AM treatment. Additionally, 9.9% of our cohort had missing death data. Further investigation is required to better define the relationship between AM exposure, death, and dosing.

This is the largest study to report on the use of AM in ELBW infants, and the only one to our knowledge to examine the association of AM with SIPs. Strengths of this study include population diversity from academic and community institutions, ability to adjust for multiple potential confounders, and a contemporary study period. Our results are generalizable to young infants admitted to a NICU following AM exposure.

This study has several limitations including its retrospective design, the inability to determine the indication for AM administration, the total dose administered, magnesium levels of the mother and infants, and timing of the magnesium administration in relation to birth. There may be differences in outcomes depending on indication. For example, infants born to mothers receiving AM for seizure prophylaxis often have placental insufficiency and growth retardation. This may alter their risk of SIP compared to infants exposed to AM for neuroprophylaxis. Another limitation is the lack of data once an infant is transferred to another hospital outside of the Pediatrix network. Outcomes such as SIP, NEC, or death may be missed on these infants. Therefore, the results need to be interpreted with caution.

In this large multicenter study we observed no significant difference in SIP, NEC, or IVH between those infants exposed to AM and those unexposed. We did report a significant decrease in death in the first 21 days after birth, though that data had a large amount of missing data. Future investigations should prospectively investigate the role of AM on SIPs, and examine the role of AM dosing on infant outcomes.

Acknowledgments

C.P.H. receives salary support for research from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001117).

M.L. is supported by the U.S. government for his work in pediatric and neonatal clinical pharmacology (HHSN267200700051C [Principal Investigator: Benjamin]); National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K23 HD068497); and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R34 HL124038).

P.B.S. receives salary support for research from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the NIH (1R21HD080606-01A1 and UL1TR001117), the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HHSN275201000003I and 1R01-HD081044-01), and the Food and Drug Administration (1R18-FD005292-01); he also receives research support from Cempra Pharmaceuticals (subaward to HHS0100201300009C) and industry for neonatal and pediatric drug development (www.dcri.duke.edu/research/coi.jsp).

Role of study sponsors: Sponsors had no involvement in the study design; the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; the writing of the report; nor the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Abbreviations

AM

Antenatal magnesium

ELBW

Extremely low birth weight

IVH

Intraventricular hemorrhage

NEC

Necrotizing enterocolitis

NICU

Neonatal intensive care unit

SIP

Spontaneous intestinal perforation

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest

All other authors reported no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Pryde PG, Mittendorf R. Contemporary usage of obstetric magnesium sulfate: indication, contraindication, and relevance of dose. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Sep;114(3):669–73. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b43b0e. Epub 2009/08/25. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jazayeri A, Jazayeri MK, Sutkin G. Tocolysis does not improve neonatal outcome in patients with preterm rupture of membranes. Am J Perinatol. 2003 May;20(4):189–93. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-40606. Epub 2003/07/23. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rouse DJ, Hirtz DG, Thom E, Varner MW, Spong CY, Mercer BM, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of magnesium sulfate for the prevention of cerebral palsy. N Engl J Med. 2008 Aug 28;359(9):895–905. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0801187. Epub 2008/08/30. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ramsey PS, Rouse DJ. Magnesium sulfate as a tocolytic agent. Semin Perinatol. 2001 Aug;25(4):236–47. doi: 10.1053/sper.2001.27546. Epub 2001/09/20. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Doyle LW, Haslam RR. Effect of magnesium sulfate given for neuroprotection before preterm birth: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003 Nov 26;290(20):2669–76. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.20.2669. Epub 2003/12/04. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Doyle LW. Magnesium sulphate for preventing preterm birth in threatened preterm labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(4):CD001060. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001060. Epub 2003/01/10. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Duley L, Gulmezoglu AM, Henderson-Smart DJ, Chou D. Magnesium sulphate and other anticonvulsants for women with pre-eclampsia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(11):CD000025. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000025.pub2. Epub 2010/11/12. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Marret S, Marpeau L, Follet-Bouhamed C, Cambonie G, Astruc D, Delaporte B, et al. Effect of magnesium sulphate on mortality and neurologic morbidity of the very-preterm newborn (of less than 33 weeks) with two-year neurological outcome: results of the prospective PREMAG trial. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2008 Mar;36(3):278–88. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2008.01.012. Epub 2008/03/14. Effet du sulfate de magnesium sur la mortalite et la morbidite neurologique chez le premature de moins de 33 semaines, avec recul a deux ans: resultats de l’essai prospectif multicentrique contre placebo PREMAG. fre. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Brazy JE, Grimm JK, Little VA. Neonatal manifestations of severe maternal hypertension occurring before the thirty-sixth week of pregnancy. J Pediatr. 1982 Feb;100(2):265–71. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(82)80653-7. Epub 1982/02/01. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jhaveri MK, Kumar SP. Passage of the first stool in very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 1987 Jun;79(6):1005–7. Epub 1987/06/01. eng. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kumar SL, Dhanireddy R. Time of first stool in premature infants: effect of gestational age and illness severity. J Pediatr. 1995 Dec;127(6):971–4. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(95)70041-2. Epub 1995/12/01. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Verma A, Dhanireddy R. Time of first stool in extremely low birth weight (< or = 1000 grams) infants. J Pediatr. 1993 Apr;122(4):626–9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)83550-4. Epub 1993/04/01. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Havranek T, Ashmeade TL, Afanador M, Carver JD. Effects of maternal magnesium sulfate administration on intestinal blood flow velocity in preterm neonates. Neonatology. 2011;100(1):44–9. doi: 10.1159/000319049. Epub 2011/01/08. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cooney DR, Rosevear W, Grosfeld JL. Maternal and postnatal hypermagnesemia and the meconium plug syndrome. J Pediatr Surg. 1976 Apr;11(2):167–72. doi: 10.1016/0022-3468(76)90281-5. Epub 1976/04/01. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rattray BN, Kraus DM, Drinker LR, Goldberg RN, Tanaka DT, Cotten CM. Antenatal magnesium sulfate and spontaneous intestinal perforation in infants less than 25 weeks gestation. J Perinatol. 2014 Nov;34(11):819–22. doi: 10.1038/jp.2014.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gordon PV, Clark R, Swanson JR, Spitzer A. Can a national dataset generate a nomogram for necrotizing enterocolitis onset? J Perinatol. 2014 Oct;34(10):732–5. doi: 10.1038/jp.2014.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Donahue L. Spontaneous intestinal perforation. Neonatal Netw. 2007 Sep-Oct;26(5):335–51. doi: 10.1891/0730-0832.26.5.335. Epub 2007/10/12. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kawase Y, Ishii T, Arai H, Uga N. Gastrointestinal perforation in very low-birthweight infants. Pediatr Int. 2006 Dec;48(6):599–603. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-200X.2006.02282.x. Epub 2006/12/16. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Attridge JT, Herman AC, Gurka MJ, Griffin MP, McGahren ED, Gordon PV. Discharge outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants with spontaneous intestinal perforations. J Perinatol. 2006 Jan 1;26(1):49–54. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211407. Epub 2005/12/02. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shah TA, Meinzen-Derr J, Gratton T, Steichen J, Donovan EF, Yolton K, et al. Hospital and neurodevelopmental outcomes of extremely low-birth-weight infants with necrotizing enterocolitis and spontaneous intestinal perforation. J Perinatol. 2011 Dec 8; doi: 10.1038/jp.2011.176. Epub 2011/12/14. Eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Payne AH, Hintz SR, Hibbs AM, Walsh MC, Vohr BR, Bann CM, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of extremely low-gestational-age neonates with low-grade periventricular-intraventricular hemorrhage. JAMA Pediatr. 2013 May 1;167(5):451–9. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.866. Epub 2013/03/06. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Beaino G, Khoshnood B, Kaminski M, Pierrat V, Marret S, Matis J, et al. Predictors of cerebral palsy in very preterm infants: the EPIPAGE prospective population-based cohort study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010 Jun;52(6):e119–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2010.03612.x. Epub 2010/02/19. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.O’Shea TM, Allred EN, Kuban KC, Hirtz D, Specter B, Durfee S, et al. Intraventricular hemorrhage and developmental outcomes at 24 months of age in extremely preterm infants. J Child Neurol. 2012 Jan;27(1):22–9. doi: 10.1177/0883073811424462. Epub 2012/01/11. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Vermeulen GM, Bruinse HW, de Vries LS. Perinatal risk factors for adverse neurodevelopmental outcome after spontaneous preterm birth. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001 Dec 1;99(2):207–12. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(01)00383-9. Epub 2002/01/15. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Basu SK, Chickajajur V, Lopez V, Bhutada A, Pagala M, Rastogi S. Immediate clinical outcomes in preterm neonates receiving antenatal magnesium for neuroprotection. J Perinat Med. 2011 Aug 11; doi: 10.1515/JPM.2011.094. Epub 2011/08/13. Eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Elimian A, Verma R, Ogburn P, Wiencek V, Spitzer A, Quirk JG. Magnesium sulfate and neonatal outcomes of preterm neonates. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2002 Aug;12(2):118–22. doi: 10.1080/jmf.12.2.118.122. Epub 2002/11/08. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mittendorf R, Covert R, Boman J, Khoshnood B, Lee KS, Siegler M. Is tocolytic magnesium sulphate associated with increased total paediatric mortality? Lancet. 1997 Nov 22;350(9090):1517–8. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)24047-x. Epub 1997/12/06. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES